• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. bras. ortop. vol.52 número1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. bras. ortop. vol.52 número1"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texto

(1)

rev bras ortop.2017;52(1):115–118

SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ORTOPEDIA E TRAUMATOLOGIA

w w w . r b o . o r g . b r

Technical

Note

Modified

axillary

radiograph

of

the

shoulder:

a

new

position

Luís

Filipe

Senna

a,∗

,

Rodrigo

Pires

e

Albuquerque

b

aHospitalEstadualAdãoPereiraNunes,Servic¸odeOrtopediaeTraumatologia,DuquedeCaxias,RJ,Brazil

bUniversidadeFederalFluminense,Servic¸odeOrtopediaeTraumatologia,Niterói,RJ,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received18December2015 Accepted28January2016 Availableonline9December2016

Keywords: Shoulder

Shoulderdislocation Shoulderjoint Radiography

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Obtainingaxillaryradiographsoftheshoulderinacutetraumaisnotalwaysfeasible.The authorspresentanewmodificationofthisradiographicview,inordertoassesstheanatomic relationshipbetweenthehumeralheadandtheglenoidcavity.Theincidenceisperformed withthepatientsittingonX-raytable,withtheaffectedlimbsupportedthereon.Theauthors describethecaseofa28-year-oldmalewhosufferedananteriorglenohumeral disloca-tionthatwasclearlyevidencedbythismodifiedradiograph.Theconcentricrelationship betweenthehumeralheadandtheglenoidcavitywasalsoeasilyconfirmedbyobtaining suchradiographafterthereductionmaneuver.

©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditora Ltda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Modificac¸ão

da

incidência

radiográfica

axilar

para

o

ombro:

uma

nova

posic¸ão

Palavras-chave: Ombro

Luxac¸ãodoombro Articulac¸ãodoombro Radiografia

r

e

s

u

m

o

Aobtenc¸ãoderadiografiasemperfilaxilardoombroemsituac¸ãodetraumaagudonem sempreétarefafácil.Osautoresapresentamumamodificac¸ãoinéditadessaincidência radiográfica,comoobjetivodeavaliararelac¸ãoanatômicadacabec¸aumeralcoma cavi-dadeglenoide.Aincidênciaémedidacomopacientesentadosobreamesadeexamesde raiosX,comomembroacometidoapoiadosobreela.Osautoresdescrevemocasodeum pacientede28anosquesofreuumepisódiodeluxac¸ãoglenoumeralanteriorquefoi clara-menteevidenciadapelaradiografiamodificada.Arelac¸ãodeconcentricidadeentreacabec¸a umeraleacavidadeglenoidefoifacilmenteconfirmadapelaobtenc¸ãodareferidaincidência radiográficaobtidaapósamanobradereduc¸ão.

©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublicadoporElsevierEditora Ltda.Este ´eumartigoOpenAccesssobumalicenc¸aCCBY-NC-ND(http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

StudyconductedatHospitalMunicipalDr.NelsondeSáEarp,Petrópolis,RiodeJaneiro,RJ,Brazil,andatHospitalEstadualAdãoPereira Nunes,DuquedeCaxias,RJ,Brazil.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:lfsenna@yahoo.com.br(L.F.Senna). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2016.12.001

(2)

116

rev bras ortop.2017;52(1):115–118

Introduction

Thereisageneralrecommendationforthecareoforthopedic traumapatients,whichistoobtainatleasttworadiographic viewsinorthogonalplanesforproperevaluationofthe trau-matized limb or joint.1 In the case of the shoulder joint, suchrecommendationisparticularly valuable,asfailure to obtainX-raysinorthogonalplanes,especiallyfailuretoobtain axillaryradiographs,isconsidered tobethemaincause of misdiagnosisinglenohumeraldislocations.2Radiographsin anteroposterior,lateralscapula,andaxillaryviewsareknown astheshouldertraumaseries3andmustbeperformedonall patientswithtraumaofsuchjoint.Theaxillaryviewwasfirst describedin1915byLawrenceapudJensenandRockwood,4 and can bedone withthe patient standing or sitting. Ide-ally,itisnecessarytopositiontheshoulderinapproximately 70◦–90ofabductiontoobtainthisradiograph.Inpatientswith mildtrauma, this degreeofabductionisfeasible; however, forpatients withmoreseveretrauma, andespeciallythose withglenohumeraljointdislocation,itisextremelydifficult toobtaintheaxialimage,becausepainandjointincongruity greatlylimittheabductioncapacityofthejoint.Thus, modi-ficationsintheclassicalaxillaryviewhavebeenproposed.5,6 TheviewdescribedbyBloomandObata5isperhapsthebest knownmethod,asitallowsforanaxillaryradiography with-outremovingthepatient’sarmfromthesling–whichwould inprinciplebemorecomfortable.Nonetheless, theauthors havefoundthis viewtobedifficulttoobtain, especiallyin the elderly, since it requires leaning the trunk posteriorly withthepatientstanding;maintainingbalanceisdifficultand limbpositioningishindered.TheviewdescribedbyCleaves6 requirestheuseofacurvedchassis,whichisnotwidely avail-able.Facedwiththesedifficulties,theauthorsidentifiedthe needtodevelopamodificationoftheLawrencetechniquein apositionthatwasmorecomfortableforthepatientand eas-iertoreproduce.Thepatient’spositioningfortheradiograph was namedthe Sennaposition, inreference tothe author andcreatorofthetechnique.Theincidencedescribedbelow aimstoshow,inaxialprojection,therelationshipbetweenthe humeralheadandglenoidcavity.

Technique

Toobtainthepresentmodificationoftheaxillaryradiograph, the patientis requiredtosit withthe feet hanging onthe radiographic table. Then, the patient is requested to posi-tiontheopenhandoftheaffectedsideonthetable.Onlya smalldegreeofabductionisrequired.Theabductionangle formedbetweenthemedialaspectofthearmandthelateral chestshould beapproximately 30◦. TheX-raysare pointed totheglenohumeraljoint,perpendiculartothetable,60cm fromtheshoulder.Thechassiswithradiographicfilmis pos-itioned on thetable, directly underthe shadowformed by the shoulder contour, with its anterior border just behind thegreater trochanter ofthefemur(Fig. 1). Itisimportant tonotethatthepatient’sbodyshouldslightlylean approxi-mately10◦totheaffectedside.Thetrunkshouldalsobetilted backandthepatientshouldbeaskedtotrytoaccentuatethe

Fig.1–Schematicillustrationrepresentingthefrontal(A) andsuperiorview(B)ofthepatientandthechassis positioning,aswellastheincidenceangleofX-raysforthe modifiedaxillaryradiograph.

thoracickyphosis.Interestingly,thislateralinclinationofthe trunk, withaccentuationofthe thoracickyphosis, is natu-rallyadoptedbymostpatientssufferingfromglenohumeral dislocationwhenseated,whichmakestheexameasierand lesspainfulforthepatientasitrespectsthenaturalantalgic position.

Case

report

(3)

rev bras ortop.2017;52(1):115–118

117

Fig.2–Frontal(A)andlateral(B)photographsofthepatient fortheradiographicSennaposition.

reportedseverepainatanymanipulationoftheaffectedlimb. Theneurovascularexaminationoftheupperlimbswas unal-tered.Giventhe suspecteddislocationoftheglenohumeral joint,twoX-raysoftheleft shoulder,inorthogonalplanes, werenecessary.Inadditiontotheanteroposterior radiogra-phy, a modified axillary view (in the Senna position) was alsoobtained(Fig.2).Thelatterclearlyevidencedananterior glenohumeraldislocation.Thepatientunderwentsuccessful closedreductionthroughtractionandcountertraction.After reduction,anewradiographinSennapositionwasobtained,

Fig.3–Radiographsbeforereduction(A)andafterreduction (B)oftheglenohumeraldislocationofthepatientinFig.2.

whichconfirmedtheconcentricjointreduction(Fig.3).The patientwasthenimmobilizedwithaVelpeaushouldersling andreferredtooutpatienttreatment.

Final

remarks

The present modified axillary incidence was shown to be easytoperform,withminimaldiscomforttothepatient.The obtainedimagesclearlyevidenced theanatomical relation-shipbetweenthehumeralheadandglenoidcavityinanaxial view,andallowedforthesafeassessmentofglenohumeral dislocationanditsreduction.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

(4)

118

rev bras ortop.2017;52(1):115–118

2.RoweC,ZarinsB.Chronicunreduceddislocationofthe shoulder.JBoneJtSurgAm.1982;64(4):494–505. 3.NeerCS2nd.Displacedproximalhumeralfractures.I.

Classificationandevaluation.JBoneJtSurgAm. 1970;52(6):1077–89.

4.JensenKL,RockwoodCAJr.Radiographicevaluationof shoulderproblems.In:RockwoodCAJr,MatsenFA3rd,Wirth

MA,LippittSB,editors.Theshoulder.Philadelphia:Saunders Elsevier;2004.p.188.

5.BloomMH,ObataWG.Diagnosisofposteriordislocationofthe shoulderwithuseofVelpeauaxillaryandangle-up

roentgenographicviews.JBoneJtSurgAm.1967;49(5):943–9. 6.CleavesEN.Anewfilmholderforroentgenexaminationsof

Imagem

Fig. 1 – Schematic illustration representing the frontal (A) and superior view (B) of the patient and the chassis positioning, as well as the incidence angle of X-rays for the modified axillary radiograph.
Fig. 2 – Frontal (A) and lateral (B) photographs of the patient for the radiographic Senna position.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Devido a esses benefícios o Método Pilates pode contribuir para mudanças na maneira como seus praticantes percebem sua imagem corporal, sendo esta entendida como a representação

This is because they allegedly involve more patients and a higher number of patients with triple-vessel disease, more patients with a proximal left anterior descending

Dessa forma, infere-se que, apesar de haver o conhecimento por parte dos entrevistados de que o Cadastro Único é uma ferramenta valiosa que permitiria conhecer

Although such patients present chronic respiratory disease, it is less severe than that seen in patients with early-onset CF, and the incidence of infection

Desta forma, este trabalho teve como objetivo caracterizar m´ eis provenientes de diversas regi˜ oes do estado da Bahia com o prop´ osito de inferir sobre o frescor e avaliar a

 A Comunicação Institucional, também chamada de Comunicação Empresarial, na essência, busca projetar uma imagem favorável junto aos seus públicos, contudo, não está tão

Due to this lack of consensus about imaging evalua- tion of children and adolescents with mild head trauma, in the present study we aimed to identify which pediatric patients

This study is a pioneer in the evaluation of patients by liver elastography in screening program for liver transplantation with severe liver disease patients, with higher