ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION
Laparoscopyisadiagnosticandthera-peutic technique used with increasing frequencybygynecologists,digestivetract surgeons,urologistsandgeneralsurgeons. Generally, it is a safe and effective proce-dure,withassociatedmorbidityoflessthan 4%,1 and it is well tolerated by patients. Laparoscopy has many advantages over conventional surgery, but it is not free of problems. Although infrequent, there have been reports of different iatrogenic lesionsthatmayoccurduringlaparoscopy. Vascular injuries are of great importance not only because they are responsible for problems of medical litigation,2 but also becauseoftheirsignificantmorbidityand consequent mortality.3-13 In fact, they are the second most common cause of death duringlaparoscopy.1
Gynecological laparoscopy has certain particular characteristics: 1) a high number of indications (diagnostic, sterilization and therapeutic),andhenceagreatertheoretical possibilityforcomplications;2)itiscarried outonthelowerabdominalregion,inazone closetotheiliacvessels;3)itisoftencarried outonyoungwomen,and4)itisgenerally carriedoutbyprofessionalswithlittleorno traininginvascularrepair.
Withregardtoiatrogenicvascularinjuries andgynecologicallaparoscopy,therearemany referencesintheliteratureintheformofstud-iesinspecificcountries,3-9reviews3,5,10-12and casereports.3-13However,onlyafewreports includethepointsofviewofthevascularsur-geonsinvolvedinsuchinterventions.10,11,13,14 Itwasthislatteraspectthatpromptedusto undertakethepresentstudy.
In this report, we review the experi-enceoftwovascularsurgeonsinrelationto suchinjuries,withananalysisofcasesthat theyhavebeeninvolvedin.Also,wemake
recommendationsaccordingtoourpointof viewasvascularsurgeons,soastohelpin preventingthesepotentiallylife-threatening complications.
CASES Theclinicalrecordsandoperativereports offivepatientswhosustainedinjuriestothe iliacvesselsduringelectivelaparoscopicsur-geryoveraten-yearperiodwerereviewedfor thisanalysis.Eachpatientwasanalyzedwith regardtoage,anatomicallocationofthevas-cularinjury,mechanismofinjury,riskfactors, blood loss, type of surgical repair, outcome andfollow-up.
During the period between 1993 and 2003, five patients with seven iatrogenic iliac vessel injuries during gynecologi-cal therapeutic laparoscopic surgery were treatedattheUnionMemorialHospitalof Baltimore,Maryland,USA(threepatients) and the University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca,Spain(twopatients).Allofthe cases occurred during the first five years (1993-1997).Theirmeanagewas30.8years (range:23-42).Thelesionswerelocatedin theleftexternaliliacartery(onecase),the right common iliac artery (two cases) and concomitantly in the right common iliac artery and vein (two cases). One patient alsohadapoint-likeperforationofthesmall bowel.Theonlylesiontotheleftvascularaxis occurredduringlaparoscopicdissectionina patientwithahistoryofpreviouslaparoscopy (four years earlier) and total hysterectomy plusadnexectomyduetoendometriosisand metropathicuterus(threeyearspreviously): thispatienthadintra-abdominaladherences. Alllesionstotherightvascularaxisoccurred whenintroducingthefirsttrocar.Oneofthe patientsinparticularwasasthenic,whilethe othershadnobackgroundsorclinicaldata ofinterest(Table1).
UPD
A
TING AR
TICLE
MarcelloBarbosaBarros
FranciscoS.Lozano
LuisQueral
Vascularinjuriesduring
gynecologicallaparoscopy
–thevascularsurgeon’sadvice
VascularSurgeryDepartmentsoftheUniversityHospitalofSalamanca,
Spain,andtheUnionMemorialHospital,Baltimore,UnitedStates
CONTEXT:Iatrogenicvascularproblemsdueto laparoscopyareawellrecognizedproblemand leadtosignificantrepercussions.Inthiscontext, a ten-year review of cases topic is presented, basedonexperiencegainedwhileheadingtwo importantvascularsurgeryservices.
CASES: Fivepatientswithvascularinjuriesdur-ingelectivelaparoscopyaredescribed.These patients presented with seven lesions of iliac vessels. All cases were evaluated immediately andrequiredlaparotomy,provisionalhemostasis andurgentattendancebyavascularsurgeon. Direct suturing was performed in three cases. Oneaortoiliacbypassandoneilioiliacreversed venousgraftweremade.Venouslesionswere sutured. One case of a point-like perforation ofthesmallbowelwasfound.Therewereno deathsandnocomplicationsduringthepostop-erativeperiod.
DISCUSSION: Important points on this subject aremade,andadviceisgiven.Thereneedsto beimmediaterecognitionofthevascularinjury, andexpertrepairbyavascularsurgeonisrec-ommended,inordertosignificantlyreducethe degreeofcomplications.
KEYWORDS: Vascularinjury.Laparoscopy.Gy-necologicalsurgery.VascularSurgery.
39
In all cases, immediate recognition of massivehemorrhagingmadeitnecessaryto performlaparotomyandmanualcompres-sion of the abdominal aorta, and to call for an urgent intervention by a vascular surgeon.Inthreecases,directsuturingwas performed;inanother,anaortoiliacbypass was made (using polytetrafluoroethylene, PTFE); and in the last case, an ilioiliac reversedvenousgraftwasinterposed.The twovenouslesionsweresutured.Thepoint-likeperforationofthesmallbowelwasalso sutured. The mean hemorrhage volume was3.2liters.
Allpatientssurvivedandtherewereno complicationsduringthepostoperativepe-riod.Thepatientsweredischargedbetween the 9th and 14th days after the operation. None showed any resulting consequence duringthefollow-upperiod,whichlastedsix totenyears.Noneofthepatientsreported intermittentclaudication,heavinessorlimb edema.Atthesametime,noninvasivestud-ies (duplex imaging) consistently revealed thepermeabilityoftherepairsmade,with no images suggestive of pseudoaneurysm (Table1).Nonetheless,twoofthepatients insistedontakinglegalaction.
DISCUSSION Inadditiontonon-hospitalcausesof vascular lesions (trauma, violence, etc), intraoperativeiatrogenicvascularinjuries areanimportantcauseforconcern.Their diagnosisandtreatmentformpartofthe vascular surgeon’s duties.These kinds of iatrogenicinjuriesarisefromconventional (open) surgery, endovascular techniques (angioplasty, stenting etc) and, naturally, endoscopy.Inthissense,thesurgeonfaces differentlesions,anddifferentetiological agents and mechanisms are involved. In thislight,wewillfocusonendoscopicle-sions.Theseareconsideredtobeimportant potential causes of morbidity and even death,ifnottreatedappropriatelyandat therighttime.Inparticular,gynecological
laparoscopyisafieldinwhichsuchcom-plications are usually a cause for great concernandfear.
Theincidenceofvascularinjuriesdur-inggynecologicallaparoscopyisfortunately verylow.Studiesinspecificcountrieshave reported an incidence of 0.1 cases per thousand procedures.4,8This frequency is lowerthanwhathasbeenrecordedforother lesions(intestinal,urethralorbladder).7,9,15 In addition, this percentage does not dif-ferfromwhathasbeenreportedforopen gynecologicalsurgery3,4orforgeneraland digestivetractlaparoscopy.15-17
Althoughitisuncommonevenforvas-cularsurgeonstohavetotreatsuchlesions, there needs to be an awareness of their existence,theproblemsinvolved,andthe wayinwhichtheyarebestmanaged,since thesearepotentiallylife-threateningsitua- tions.Inareviewofthelistof408trocar-relatedmajorvascularinjuriesnotifiedto theFoodandDrugAdministration(FDA) by the medical device industry, between 1993andtheendof1996,itwasobserved that26deathsoccurred,thusrepresenting amortalityrateof6.37%forvascularlapa-roscopic injuries.18 A more recent report foundatotaloffourdeathsfrom37major vascularinjuriesoftheaorta,venacavaand iliacvessels,thusrepresentingamortality rateof10.81%.19
Failures in vascular repairs have also beendescribed,whichcomplicatetheim-mediate postoperative period with acute ischemiaorvenousthrombosis.Ultimately, there may be arterial or venous conse- quencesintheformofintermittentclau-dication or venous edema, in that order. Nonetheless,onlyafewpublications3,5,11,13 provideinformationwithrespecttothese extremes;ourfivepatientsdidnotsuffer frompostoperativecomplicationsorcon-sequences,asassessedbydupleximaging afterameanfollow-upperiodoftenyears. Also,asintwoofourcases,insuchsitua-tionsitisnotuncommonforproblemsof
medical litigation to occur, in which the vascularsurgeonisalsoinvolved.1,2,20
The terminal aorta and iliac vessels arethemostcommonsitesforinjuries,as reported in the literature. An associated between arterial and venous lesions, as seenintwocasesinthepresentstudy,was foundin10%ofthecasesintheliterature, overall.5,10,12,21,22
The mechanism responsible for the injuryisintimatelyrelatedtothelaparo-scopic technique and instruments used. The setup protocol (pneumoperitoneal needleorumbilicaltrocar)isthemostcom-moncausativeagentforvascularinjury,as happenedinourcases,5-7,10-12,16,21although other mechanisms have been reported, relatingtotheoperativeprocedure.3,4,7,11,20 Indeed, the most common mechanism is arterial or venous injury leading to rap-idly recognizable hemorrhage, although later hemorrhaging cannot be ruled out. This would initially be contained by the pneumoperitoneumandtheTrendelenburg position,orbyaretroperitonealhematoma, andmayonlybecomeapparenthoursafter thelaparoscopy.4,11,22,23Finally,therehave alsobeenreportsofvascularinjuriesthat wentunnoticedatthetimetheyoccurred andthatwereonlydiscoveredmonthsafter the laparoscopy, in the form of pseudoa-neurysms11 or arteriovenous fistulas. We have not found any, but they do remain apossibility.
In the light of the above, nearly all publications have reported (and discussed) differentguidelinesandpreventivemeasures, mainlyfocusingonthoserelatedtotheactual laparoscopictechnique.1-13,16,23-29Despitethis, thetherapeuticaspects,especiallyinrelation tovasculartherapy,arenotusuallyaddressed indepth.11,13,14
Initially, the key therapeutic role is played by the gynecologist who performs the laparoscopy. The gynecologist must recognizeanyinjuryearlyonandcarryout provisional, rapid and efficient hemostasis
Case Hospital Patient’s
age Riskfactors Locationofiliacarteriallesion lesionsOther Mechanism loss(liters)Blood Operation Outcome Follow-up*
1 UMH 27 None Rightcommon None Trocar/introduction 3.2 Suture Survived Nosequelae 2 UMH 23 None Rightcommon RCIV Trocar/introduction 3.4 Suture Survived Nosequelae 3 UMH 33 None Rightcommon RCIV Trocar/introduction 3.1 Suture Survived Nosequelae 4 UHS 42 Adherences Leftexternal None Dissection 2.4 Venousgraft Survived Nosequelae 5 UHS 29 Thinness Rightcommon§ PIP† Trocar/introduction 4.0 PTFEgraft Survived Nosequelae
UMH=UnionMemorialHospital,Baltimore,Maryland,USA;UHS=UniversityHospitalofSalamanca,Spain.RCIV=rightcommoniliacvein;PIP=point-likeintestinalperforation;PTFE= polytetrafluoroethylene.*6-10years.§Ataorticbifurcation†Suture.
Table1.Iliacarterialandvenousinjuriesduetogynecologicallaparoscopyinfivepatientsoperatedbetween1993and 2003intwohospitals
40
(manual,ratherthanwithclamps).Areview of the literature has highlighted this point since,ifthediagnosisoftheinjuryismade late,themortalitymayreachupto33%.11 Inallourcases,thesebasicprincipleswere fulfilledsatisfactorily.
Although small hemorrhages can be controlled laparoscopically,4,5,20,24 injuries ofthelargevessels(aorta,venacavaoriliac vessels) require immediate performance of laparotomytoundertakeproximalvascular control, because of the profuse bleeding that occurs.The fastest and best approach is a median laparotomy.The Pfannenstiel laparotomy, although practiced by many gynecologists,isnotrecommendedbecause ithinderslatervascularrepair.Oneofour patientsunderwentthistypeofabdominal openingandthishadtobeconvertedtofull medianlaparotomy.
Surgery of vascular traumas involves a method, tactics and technique that gy-necologists are not usually familiar with. Apart from certain exceptional cases, it is besttocallforaspecialistinvascularsurgery fromtheverystart,afterahemorrhagehas beendetected;ourcasesaregoodexamples of this. According to Chapron et al.,5 the vascular surgeon is not always consulted (71.4%ofthecases).
The ideal situation is to perform a completevascularrepair,sinceitiscounter-productivetoligatethecommonorexternal iliac arteries or veins. Usually, the arterial
lesion will allow an arteriorrhaphy to be performed,usinginterruptedmonofilament suturessoastoavoidstenosis.3,10-13Inlesions wherethisisnotpossible,becauseitwould inducestenosisinthearteriallumen,theuse of patch angioplasty (venous or synthetic) isindicated.10,11,21Onafewoccasions,itis possibletosectiontheartery,trimitsedges, andperformanastomosisofthetwoends.11,21 Finally,whenthearteriallesionisverylarge and/or it is desired to perform an arterial resection(casesofintimalflap),theimplan-tation of autologous or synthetic grafts is necessarytoachievearterialcontinuity,either byinterposingthegraftorintheformofa bypass.3,10,11Thesewerepreciselythecasesof ourpatientswhorequiredgrafts.
Insituationsofcontamination,theuse of synthetic material should be avoided. Another technical detail that we consider importantisthepracticeofarterialthrom- bectomyusingaFogartyprobe,withclean-ingofthearteriallumenusingheparinized salineserum,incasesinwhichthemanual hemostasis (together with instrumental clamping)hasbeenveryprolonged.Insuch situations,intravascularcoagulationoccurs distallytotheclampsite,sincesuchpatients are not usually receiving anticoagulant therapy,ashappensinconventionaldirect arterialsurgery.Ourtwomostseverecases requiredthrombectomy.
Whereverpossible,venousligationshould beavoided,althoughitisreferredtoinsome
publications.10,13Itisbettertorepairavein (venorrhaphy),evenattheriskofsubsequent thrombosis,thantoligateit.Aligatedvein can never be recanalized and will therefore always lead to a greater degree of venous insufficiency. Sometimes, to expose an iliac veinappropriately,itisnecessarytotransectits homonymousarteryfirst,andthenrepairboth theveinandtheartery.Weusedthistechnical maneuverinoneofourpatients.
Finally,twoaspectsofpostoperativesur-veillancedeservecomment:1)theprevention ofthrombosisintheiliacvein(eventhough thisisnotaffecteddirectly),sinceinthistype ofsituationmanyspecificthrombogenicfac-torsareinvolved(contiguitytothetrauma, hypovolemiaetc)thatareassociatedwithother general factors typical of the postoperative period;and2)theneedforexhaustivefollow-upovertheshort,mediumandlong-term,so astoruleoutconsequencesarisingfromthe surgeryitselforunnoticedlesions.
In all cases, efficient interdisciplinary liaison between the gynecologist and the vascular surgeon is recommended, so that thesevereproblemsthatmayarisefromiat-rogenicvascularinjuriesduringgynecologic laparoscopycanbeminimized.Althoughthis isnotgenerallytherule,thepresenceandhelp ofavascularsurgeon,whendealingwithan iatrogenicvascularinjury,mayoftenincrease the chances of better solutions, since this canassistinmanagingthelesionsinamore familiarandeffectiveway.
1. DixonM,CarrilloEH.Iliacvascularinjuriesduringelective laparoscopicsurgery.SurgEndosc.1999;13(12):1230-3. 2.
SoutoulJH,PierreF.Lesrisquesmédico-légauxdelacoelios-copie.Analysede32dossiersdecomplicactions.[Medicolegal risks of celioscopy. Analysis of 32 cases of complications] J GynecolObstetBiolReprod(Paris).1988;17(4):439-51. 3. BergqvistD,BergqvistA.Vascularinjuriesduringgynecologic
surgery.ActaObstetGynecolScand.1987;66(1):19-23. 4. ChapronC,QuerleuD,MageG,etal.Complicationsdela
coeliochirurgiegynécologique.Etudemulticentriqueàpartirde 7,604coelioscopies.[Complicationsofgynecologiclaparoscopy. Multicentricstudyof7,604laparoscopies].JGynecolObstet BiolReprod(Paris).1992;21(2):207-13.
5. ChapronCM,PierreF,LacroixS,QuerleuD,LansacJ,Dubuis-sonJB.Majorvascularinjuriesduringgynecologiclaparoscopy. JAmCollSurg.1997;185(5):461-5.
6. MarretH,PierreF,ChapronC,PerrotinF,BodyG,LansacJ. Complicationsdelacoelioscopieoccasionnéesparlestrocards. EtudepréliminairedanslecadreduRegistrenationaldelaSociété Françaised’EndoscopieGynécologique(SFEG).[Complications oflaparoscopycausedbytrocars.Preliminarystudyfromthena-tionalregistryoftheFrenchSocietyofGynecologicEndoscopy]. JGynecolObstetBiolReprod(Paris).1997;26(4):405-12. 7. Härkki-SirénP,KurkiT.Anationwideanalysisoflaparoscopic
complications.ObstetGynecol.1997;89(1):108-12. 8. Härkki-SirénP,SjöbergJ,MäkinenJ,etal.Finnishnational
registeroflaparoscopichysterectomies:areviewandcomplica-tionsof1165operations.AmJObstetGynecol.1997;176(1 Pt1):118-22.
9. Härkki-Sirén P, Sjöberg J, KurkiT. Major complications of laparoscopy: a follow-up Finnish study. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94(1):94-8.
10. BaadsgaardSE,BilleS,EgebladK.Majorvascularinjuryduring gynecologiclaparoscopy.Reportofacaseandreviewofpub-lishedcases.ActaObstetGynecolScand.1989;68(3):283-5. 11. NordestgaardAG,BodilyKC,OsborneRW,ButtorffJD.Major
vascularinjuriesduringlaparoscopicprocedures.AmJSurg. 1995;169(5):543-5.
12. GeersJ,HoldenC.Majorvascularinjuryasacomplicationof laparoscopicsurgery:areportofthreecasesandreviewofthe literature.AmSurg.1996;62(5):377-9.
13. WitzM,LehmannJM.Majorvascularinjuryduringlaparos-copy.BrJSurg.1997;84(6):800.
14. NehlerMR,TaylorLM,PorterJM.Iatrogenicvasculartrauma. SeminVascSurg.1998;11(4):283-93.
15. Munro MG. Laparoscopic access: complications, tech-nologies, and techniques. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;14(4):365-74.
REFERENCES
41
AUTHORS INFORMATION
Marcello Barbosa Barros, MD. Vascular Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Salamanca, University of Sala-manca, SalaSala-manca, Spain. Sponsored by Fundación Carolina(Spain).
Francisco S. Lozano, PhD, FACS. Head of Section of the VascularSurgeryUnitandProfessorofSurgery,University HospitalofSalamanca,Spain.
Luis Queral, PhD, FACS.Co-director, Maryland Vascular Institute,UnionMemorialHospital,Baltimore,USA.
Addressforcorrespondence:
MarcelloB.Barros,MD
DepartamentodeCirugía—FacultaddeMedicina CallePeñuelasdeSanBlas22-24—2oB–E-37007 Salamanca,Spain
Tel.(+34)923.26.85.47—Fax.(+34) 923.29.45.58
E-mail:[email protected]
Copyright©2005,AssociaçãoPaulistadeMedicina
RESUMO
Lesõesvascularesemlaparoscopiaginecológica—recomendaçõesdacirurgiavascular
CONTEXTO:Iatrogeniasvascularesnaslaparoscopiassãoumproblemabemreconhecidoepodemlevar aimportantesrepercussões.Nestecontexto,sãoapresentadasimportantesinformaçõessobreotemae descriçãodecasosduranteadireçãodedoisimportantesserviçosdecirurgiavascular,abrangendouma experiênciade10anos.
CASOS:Sãodescritoscincocasosdelesãovasculardurantelaparoscopiaeletiva,dentreosquaissetelesões devasosilíacos.Todosforamdiagnosticadosimediatamenteenecessitaramdelaparotomia,hemostasia provisóriaeintervençãodeurgênciaporumcirurgiãovascular.Emtrêscasosfoirealizadasuturadireta. Realizou-seumbypassaorto-ilíacoeumenxertoilíaco-ilíacocomsafenainvertida.Aslesõesvenosasforam suturadas.Umcasodelesãopuntiformeemintestinodelgadofoiencontrado.Nãohouvemortalidadeou complicaçõesnoperiodopós-operatório.
DISCUSSÃO:Importantesconsideraçõeseconselhosarespeitodotemasãoapresentados.Devehaver reconhecimentoimediatodalesãovascularecombinadoaoreparovascularespecializadoérecomendado parareduzirsignificativamenteograudecomplicações.
PALAVRAS-CHAVE:Lesãovascular.Laparoscopia.Cirurgiaginecológica.Cirurgiavascular. 16. Saville LE, Woods MS. Laparoscopy and major
ret-roperitoneal vascular injuries (MRVI). Surg Endosc. 1995;9(10):1096-100.
17. Schäfer M, Lauper M, Krähenbühl L. A nation’s experience of bleeding complications during laparoscopy. Am J Surg. 2000;180(1):73-7.
18. Bhoyrul S, Vierra MA, Nezhat CR, KrummelTM, Way LW.Trocarinjuriesinlaparoscopicsurgery.JAmCollSurg. 2001;192(6):677-83.
19. Sharp HT, Dodson MK, Draper ML, Watts DA, Dou-cette RC, Hurd WW. Complications associated with optical-access laparoscopic trocars. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(4):553-5
20. NezhatCR,ChildersJ,BorhanS.MajorVesselInjuryDuring AdvancedLaparoscopicSurgery.JAmAssocGynecolLaparosc. 1996;3(4,Supplement):S33.
21. FruhwirthJ,LangPF.IatrogeneGefässläsionenbeilaparosko-pischen Eingriffen in der Gynäkologie. [Iatrogenic vascular lesionsinlaparoscopicinterventionsingynecology].Zentralbl Gynakol.1997;119(6):265-8.
22. LeronE,PiuraB,OhanaE,MazorM.Delayedrecognitionof majorvascularinjuryduringlaparoscopy.EurJObstetGynecol ReprodBiol.1998;79(1):91-3.
23. Seidman DS, Nasserbakht F, Nezhat F, Nezhat C. Delayed recognitionofiliacarteryinjuryduringlaparoscopicsurgery. SurgEndosc.1996;10(11):1099-101.
24. CharvolinJY,QuerleuD,LanvinD,CossonM,DubecqF. Réparation coeliochirurgicale des complications opératoires delacoelioscopieengynécologie.ExpériencedupavillonPaul GellédeRoubaixde1992à1995.[Laparoscopicsurgicalrepair ofsurgicalcomplicationoflaparoscopyingynecology.Experi-encesatthePaulGelledeRubaixCenterfrom1992to1995. JGynecolObstetBiolReprod(Paris).1997;26(6):585-9. 25. Mirhashemi R, Harlow BL, Ginsburg ES, Signorello LB,
Berkowitz R, Feldman S. Predicting risk of complications with gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92(3):327-31.
26. Lin P, Grow DR. Complications of laparoscopy. Strategies for prevention and cure. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1999;26(1):23-38.
27. BonjerHJ,HazebroekEJ,KazemierG,GiuffridaMC,MeijerWS, LangeJF.Openversusclosedestablishmentofpneumoperito-neuminlaparoscopicsurgery.BrJSurg.1997;84(5):599-602. 28. WoolcottR.Thesafetyoflaparoscopyperformedbydirecttrocar
insertionandcarbondioxideinsufflationundervision.AustN ZJObstetGynaecol.1997;37(2):216-9.
29. HanneyRM,CarmaltHL,MerrettN,TaitN.Vascularinjuries duringlaparoscopyassociatedwiththeHassontechnique.JAm CollSurg.1999;188(3):337-8.
Sourcesoffunding:None
Conflictofinterest:None
Dateoffirstsubmission:February16,2004
Lastreceived:May17,2004
Accepted:November22,2004