• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Human-Computer Interaction Dept of Information Technology Uppsala University

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Share "Human-Computer Interaction Dept of Information Technology Uppsala University"

Copied!
29
0
0

Texto

(1)

Humans in complex dynamic systems Situation awareness, automation and

the GMOC model – 2, examples

Human-Computer Interaction Dept of Information Technology Uppsala University

Bengt Sandblad

http://www.it.uu.se/research/hci

(2)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

Dept of Information Technology |Human-Computer Interaction |http://www.it.uu.se/research/hci/

Agenda

 Summary

 A model of human control (GMOC)

 Situation awareness

 Automation problems

 How to develop usable operator

systems? An example.

(3)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s Operators need

 To be in “full control”, i.e. have a high situation awareness

 This means to fulfil all requirements based on the GMOC model

 This often means show much and dynamic information

 “to little information will result in

cognitive overload”

(4)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

Dept of Information Technology |Human-Computer Interaction |http://www.it.uu.se/research/hci/

(5)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

Automation problems

 Automation:

 Mechanical or electronic replacement of

human labour (physical or mental).

(6)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

Dept of Information Technology |Human-Computer Interaction |http://www.it.uu.se/research/hci/

Problems with automation

 Automation surprises (hinders SA)

 Difficulties to predict...

 The irony of automation

 No help when it is most needed…

 Allocation of functions (human vs.

machine)

 MABA-MABA analysis

 Authority dilemmas (e.g. in aviation)

(7)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s “Autonomy”

 The problems with autonomous automatic systems (autopilots)

 The automatic systems does exactly what it is told to do (non-autonomous)

 The automatic system has its own

plans (autonomous) – this can cause severe problems!

 Example – operators turn the

automatic system off (“irony of a”).

(8)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

Dept of Information Technology |Human-Computer Interaction |http://www.it.uu.se/research/hci/

OR....

(9)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s An example

 Train traffic control

 From today’s system to something

new and better.

(10)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

Dept of Information Technology |Human-Computer Interaction |http://www.it.uu.se/research/hci/

A traffic control centre

(11)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

The time-distance graph

(12)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

Dept of Information Technology |Human-Computer Interaction |http://www.it.uu.se/research/hci/

The graph

(13)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

Communication and

cooperation

(14)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

Dept of Information Technology |Human-Computer Interaction |http://www.it.uu.se/research/hci/

A complex organisation

(15)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

Today’s control system

Train Traffic Process

Control System Remote Blocking

Train Dispatcher

Time-Distance Graph on paper

Automatic Traffic Control System

Auto

.

Auto

.

Information Systems Information

Systems Information

Systems

A complex environment

-Drivers

-………..

(16)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

Dept of Information Technology |Human-Computer Interaction |http://www.it.uu.se/research/hci/

The problems..…

 Lack of overview

 Many separated information systems

 Focus on control of the technical infrastructure, not on the traffic

 Conflicts and disturbances are detected too late

 Lack of precision in data

 Observability problems, data missing

 Controllability problems, timing of actions

 Complexity induced by autonomous automatic functions

 Time consuming communication with train drivers

Dispatchers lack efficient support when this is

most needed!!

(17)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

A new control strategy

 Traffic control through real-time re-planning of a traffic plan

 Automatic execution of the continuously updated traffic plan

 A complete plan from start to stop

 Possibilities to optimize better

 Manual execution when necessary

 Automatic functions are made predictable

 Can not change track usage or train order

 Improved communication between trains and

control centres, train drivers are made aware of

the plan

(18)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

Dept of Information Technology |Human-Computer Interaction |http://www.it.uu.se/research/hci/

Real-Time Data Base

Traffic Plan Process Status

Train Traffic Process

Re-Planner role

Executor role Train

Traffic Controllers

Executor function

Manual Automatic

Operator-Process Interface Decision Support

System/plan verification

Time-Distance diagram Track diagram

The new control strategy

A complex

environment

-Drivers

-………..

(19)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s The new user interface

 Presents dynamic traffic data

 the operator is always “in full control”

 supports “situation awareness”

 Supports planning tasks

 Supports early detection of conflicts

 Shows possible solutions

 Integrated information presentation

(20)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

Dept of Information Technology |Human-Computer Interaction |http://www.it.uu.se/research/hci/

tisd a g 13 oktob er

-10

-6 -10

-1 -1

2310

-6

7 80 7 7 80 8

7 90 6 7 80 8 7 90 8

7 806 7 90 7 79 06

7 80 9 7 808

7 90 9 7909

7905 27 0 5

2 20 9 560

2281

2204 956

2281

2204

430 560

820

2283

1 6102

16102

16104

16104 91

2 70 4 2708

2607

2 60 7 2 60 7

2706

78 07 790

7 780

9

79 05 270

7

270 5

2 20 9

2 20 4

2 209 2 281 2 28 1

2 281

2 209

2 209 4 30 5 60

2 20 4

2 281

2 283

91

5 60 8 20 9 56

2 20 9 2209

2204

56 0

820 91

2281

26 07

-1

2 70 7 2 70 9 2709

2 68 3 260 8

2683

2 70 4 2 60 9

2609

430 UPPspår 16 min 06:17 - 06:33 Gustafsson 0709-1234566

NEDspår YTTER 11 min kvar klart 06:11 Byström 0709-1234569

UPPspår 19 min 06:22 - 06:41 Hytter 0709-1234568 NEDspår 6 min

06:40 - 06:46 Sjöström 0709-1234567

UPPspår 15 min 10:14 - 10:29

2 70 5 2 70 4 1 61 04 1 61 02 2 31 0

1 6104

2 20 9

2 70 5 2 70 4

2 31 0 1 61 02

1 61 04 2 20 9

7 90 5

79 08

1 61 04 +21 61 02 2 31 0 2 31 0

-1

2

2 70 5 2 60 7 2 20 9

7 80 7 7 90 5

NY

4 30

U

U

2 70 7

1 61 04 2 70 4 -4

7 90 5

4 30

2 70 4

S äy E by

N ol a My n S kb y

N v k S ol H el S o

C s t

K n U

Mr R s

H gv U pv

K my U dl

K e R

2 60 7 7 80 6

2 20 9

Ui 4 30

Ni NY UY

N U

.30

.20 .40

.10 .50

.30

06.00.00

07.00 07.00

06.00

5

3

4

5 4

4 5 7 0 6

1 1 1 1 1

3 4

2 2 2

3

1 2

1 2

1 2

3 2 1

2 1

3 3 3 3

4 4 4

1

3 2

2

2 7

4

3 1

2

-1

7 90 5

-1

2 70 5 2 20 9 -3

2 60 8

2 70 8 2 60 8

2 70 6 2 706 2 70 9

2 609 2 60 9 2 70 9

2 60 8

2 70 6

2 70 4

S äy E by

N ol a My n S kb y

N v k S ol H el S o

C s t

K n U

Mr R s

H gv U pv

K my U dl

K e R

-10

130 100 2 20 9 -3

2/3 V Ax

RST1 RC6 -4

-3 -2 -0 SS 40 70 130 06.08

06.44

.46 .58

356 m 480 ton

6.56 km fr. Cst

V Ax 13 36

130 3.9 132

+226 1 61 02

-9 -5 -3 -0 SS 40 70 130 06.02

06.10

.34 .40

679 m 1886 ton

49.47 km fr. Cst Gt1 RC2

5 5 5 5 5 5 5

2 2

2 2

2

2 2 2 2

2 2 2 2 2

2 2

2 2 2

2 2

2 2 2

2 2 2 2 2

2 2 2 2 2

2 2 2

2 2

2 2

2 2 2

2 2 2

2

1 1

1 1

1 1

1

1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1

1 1 1 1

1 1

1

1 1

1 1 1

1 1 1

3 3

3 3

3

3

3 3

3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3

3 3 3

3 3

3

3 3

4

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

4 4 4 4

4

4 4 4 4 4 4

4 4 4

4 4 4

4

4

4

1

1 5 6

7

7

7

7

7 5 5

2

6 6 1

Track Diagram

line, station, track, train;

track usage, train routes, actual position; track work Time-Distance diagram

(re-planning tool)

Actual Plan:

Time Table Track Usage

Prediction Deviation

Conflict detection

Plan verification and test

Linear distance scale, correlated graphics Future

Present Time

History, time distance graph

Present Past

Time Train

information

(21)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

Prototype environment at Uppsala University

Operator environment The interface is

generated by projectors

Image and sound is

recorded during ..for later analysis.. ..together with a software-

recording of the user

(22)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

Dept of Information Technology |Human-Computer Interaction |http://www.it.uu.se/research/hci/

History

Track structure Planning view

Time-distance graph

Present time

(23)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

Detection of conflicts

Station track conflict

Line track conflict

(24)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

Dept of Information Technology |Human-Computer Interaction |http://www.it.uu.se/research/hci/

Re-planning in the graph

Re-planning is made directly in the graph

Departure time and track usage can be changed

Planned graph

for selected train

Available tracks

Track usage

(25)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

(26)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

Dept of Information Technology |Human-Computer Interaction |http://www.it.uu.se/research/hci/

K (Lp)

N r N r

(Sö ö ) Jn

N U

N1 Nedspår U 1 U ppspår

0 8 :0 0 :0 0 :1 0 :2 0 :4 0 :5 0 :1 0 :1 0 :1 0

:2 0 :2 0 :2 0

:4 0 :4 0 :4 0

:5 0 :5 0 :5 0

:4 0 :5 0

0 7 :3 0 0 8 :3 0 0 9 :3 0 1 0 :3 0 11 :3 0

0 9 :0 0 1 0 :0 0 11 :0 0

2 5 1 4 3 6

07:30 07:30

07:40 07:50

08:00 08:00

11:30

11:00

10:30

10:00

09:30

09:00

08:30

08:00 11:30

11:00

10:30

10:00

09:30

09:00

08:30

Jn V h d N k K o n K K Å b y N r

O xd H lö L re T b a S sa E b g Jå r Å b a G tå [Å b y] S tö S m t

V h d N k K o n S tö S m t Å b y

H lö L re T b a S sa E b g Jå r Å b a G tå [Å b y]

(L p ) (H p b g ) (F le )

S ö ö

J ä rn a Va g n h ä ra d N y k ö p in g C K o lm å rd e n [Å b y ] Å b y

(L p ) (H p b g ) (F le )

S ö ö

N ed N ed N ed

K a trin e h o lm C

e lö s u n d H ö lö L ä s trin g e Ty s tb e rg a S jö s a E n s ta b e rg a J ö n å k e r Å lb e rg a G e tå S trå n g s jö S im o n s to rp N o rrk ö p in g C

222

222 8116

220 8819

219

219 5

2 3

1

3 2

1

1 2

1 2 3

3

2 2

3

2

3

3 3

2 222

222

2 21 2

0-0 0-0 8-2 18-5 31-4 37-6 49-8 56-8 65-2 72-7 82-0 96-7 103-1 108-5 133-9 145-1 159-3 174-4 182-2

8,2 10,3 12,9 6,2 12,2 7,0 8,4 7,5 9,3 14,7 6,4 5,4 11,2 14,2 15,1 7,8

5

3 2 3

AEF-Tågvägsorder 53 1

6 29

529

429

457

427

625

525 229

229

225 -24

225 -36

225 -23 6419

221

221

221 8827

8827

8827 230

476 6 22 4 72 4 54 422 45 8 426 628 4 28 630

8107 Ö-nr

8107 Ö-num mer

523

523

8111

8111

525

525

8119

8119

529

529

43523 Gt *

43523 Gt *

xxx 425 625 427

XXX 457 429 629

8729 8731 8733

8719 8723 98713 8725 8727 225

8721 76421 ned

8735 8737 8739 8741 6443

225 -30 68226 -16

-45 62 8

426 526

458

424 524

422 522

476 622

400 452 420

425 256 427 4 57 4 29 629

472 8

6416 68226 -20

6416

6416 (6417)

(6418)

(N ks) (N ks)

) )

68226 -18 230 230

8828

8828

522 522

8120 8120

43564

43564 524

524

526 526

8128 8128

528 528

8116 622 472 454 XXX

XXX

XXX XXX 458 426 628 428 630

8712 8714 8716 76422 upp 8722 8724 8726 8728 8730 8732 5422

222 -3 222 -1

-16 O B 2021

O B 2628 N 1 N edspår

A-arbete

Vut (A)

ID : Tsm : : Position:

:

Spärrfärd:

::

Tid:

Arbete:

O B 3027 Fredin 0708-83 4832

Kolm ården Station Spår 2

138 - 142 09:30 - 10:52

A-a

ID : Tsm : : Position:

:

Spärrfärd:

::

Tid:

Arbete:

O B 2628

0708-83 4864 Sim onstorp - Åby

Levander

Linje N 1 N edspår

08:05 - 08:55

A-a

ID : Förare:

: Position:

:

Spärrfärd:

::

Arbete:

Tid:

O B 2021 Kuoppa 0708-83 6852

Enstaberga - Jönåker

Vft Vagnuttagning för trasport Linje

10:46 - 11:35 Vft

O B 3027 Spår 2 A-aSpår 2

ID :

: Position:

:

Spärrfärd:

::

Arbete:

Tid:

O B 1832

0708-83 9124 Kolm ården - G etå

Vut (A) Linje

A-a 07:47 - 08:10 H w argård Tsm :

N o te rin g a r

OB 1833 07:47-07:57OB 1834

07:50-08:10OB 1835 07:50-08:10OB 1836

07:50-08:10

2

Alla klara kl:

O B 1832 A-a

A-a

OB 1832 07:47-08:10

22 5 11:08

11:56 11:56

08:03 -3 119 km /h 08:03 -3 11:30

11:00

10:30

10:00

09:30

09:00

08:30 X

X

1

3

3

3

1 X

Nks

2

3

1

2 1

5

2

5

1

5

3

48826 Ö-nr 48826 Ö-nummer

651 m 641 663 70

70 8828

9326 43523 1 2 3 T32 Åby stlv59

> >

> >

>

222 -6 68226 -17

10 km 5 0

B lu e Tra v e l 0 7 0 6 - 6 5 1 9 4 2 F ö 0 7 0 6 - 4 3 2 7 4 8 O p 4 7 2 m

7 8 6 to n R s t

R c 6 2 2 2

S S 4 0 7 0 1 3 0 G re e n L in e Ö -n u m m e r: h ö jd , b re d d ,

b ro m s ta l, e tc .

a x e la v s tå n d , 7 6 0 m 1 2 8 6 to n

8 1 0 7 0 7 0 6 - 6 5 8 4 2 3 F ö

G t R c 6 R c 6 -9 -5 -3 -0 S S 4 0 7 0 1 3 0 9 0

-4 -3 -2 -0 1 3 0

G tå N ks

3 2

3 2

2 1

3 2

2 1

6 5 4

2 1

3 2

2 1

3 2

1 2

3

2 1

2 1

3 2 1 8107 6416

8116 222

221

U1 Uppspår N1 Nedspår

N1 A-arbete

3 2 11

12 1

1

87

1 6

6

6 15 15c

15b

15

16

17 D

F

5 4

1

E A

B

C 2

21

10 14

13

20 20

9

18

19

New traffic

plan

(27)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

STEG, an operational test system

 A ”sharp” implementation in order to test and evaluate the concepts in a real traffic control centre.

 To obtain knowledge for decisions about future national control

systems (STRATEG).

 Developed in close collaboration between researchers, the rail

administration and developers.

(28)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

Dept of Information Technology |Human-Computer Interaction |http://www.it.uu.se/research/hci/

The test traffic area

(29)

Hu m an s i n co m pl ex sy st em s

The workplace

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Experimental Industrial Psychology: Human-Computer-Interaction, European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology, Münster  Schimanski, S.. 2009: Einfluss von