LIMITAÇÕES DA PESQUISA E SUGESTÕES DE TRABALHOS FUTUROS

O presente estudou limitou-se a propor um novo método multicritério e a sua aplicação em um estudo de caso, com o intuito de apresentar o seu mérito em relação ao método FRIM, em situações em que é necessário discriminar as alternativas contidas dentro do Intervalo de Referência Ideal, considerando a estrutura de preferência do tomador de decisão

Desta forma, como recomendações para trabalhos futuros é possível realizar novas análises considerando cenários diversos, maior ou menor amplitude do Intervalo de Referência Ideal e alcance, maior ou menor número de alternativas e critérios, pesos distintos entre os critérios, entre outros, a partir de uma análise de sensibilidade. Provar matematicamente a aplicabilidade do método WRIM, de tal modo que possa-se assegurar a consistência dos seus

resultados para quaisquer problema de decisão multicritério. Bem como, a sua aplicação em outros estudos de casos.

REFERÊNCIAS

AFSHARI, A.; MOJAHED, M.; YUSUFF, R. M. Simple additive weighting approach to personnel selection problem. , v. 1, n. 5, p. 511, 2010. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, v. 1, n. 5, p. 511, 2010.

AGREBI, M.; ABED, M.; OMRI, M. N. ELECTRE I Based Relevance Decision- Makers Feedback to the Location Selection of Distribution Centers. Journal of Advanced Transportation, v. 2017, p. 1–10, 2017.

AIRES, R. F. D. F. Reversão de ordem no método similarity to ideal solution - TOPSIS. [s.l.] Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Norte, 2017.

AISSAOUI, N. .; HAOUARI, M. .; HASSINI, E. Supplier selection and order lot sizing modeling: A review. Computers and Operations Research, v. 34, p. 3516–3540, 2007.

ALMEIDA, A. T. D. O Conhecimento e o Uso de Métodos Multicritério de Apoio a Decisão. Editora Un ed. Recife: UFPE, 2011.

ANDRÉ FELIPE CORRÊA. Fazer ou Comprar: proposta de uma estrutura para o processo decisório e aplicação de métodos de decisão multicritério. [s.l.] Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos da Universidade de São Paulo, 2017.

APPOLINÁRIO, F. Metodologia da ciência – filosofia e prática da pesquisa. São Paulo: Editora: [s.n.].

ASIF, Z.; CHEN, Z. An Integrated Multicriteria Decision Analysis System for Reducing Air Emissions from Mining Process. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 2019.

AUNG, T. S.; LUAN, S.; XU, Q. Application of multi-criteria-decision approach for the analysis of medical waste management systems in Myanmar. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 222, p. 733–745, 2019.

BEHERA, D. K.; SARKAR, A. A TOPSIS-Based Multi-Criteria Approach to Faculty Recruitment: A Case Study. Applied Mechanics and Materials, v. 415, n. May, p. 741–744, 2013.

BEHZADIAN, M. et al. A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 39, n. 17, p. 13051–13069, 2012.

BEJARI, H.; DAYA, A. Selection of chromite processing plant site using the fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Proceedings of the 24th International Mining Congress of Turkey,

IMCET 2015, n. May, p. 1229–1235, 2015.

BELL, D.; RAIFFA, H., &; TVERSKY, A. Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

BELTON, V.; STEWART, T. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Boston: Kluwer Academic, 2002.

BERTRAND, J. W. .; FRANSOO, J. C. Modelling and simulation: operations management research methodologies using quantitative modeling. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 22, n. 2, p. 241–264, 2002.

BRANS, J. P.; VINCKE, P. A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: (The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making). Management Science, v. 31, p. 647–656, 1985.

BRASIL. INSTRUÇÃO NORMATIVA No 76, DE 26 DE NOVEMBRO DE 2018.

DIÁRIO OFICIAL DA UNIÃO. Anais...2018Disponível em:

<https://www.in.gov.br/materia/-/asset_publisher/Kujrw0TZC2Mb/content/id/52750137/do1- 2018-11-30-instrucao-normativa-n-76-de-26-de-novembro-de-2018-52749894IN 76>

BUCKLEY, J. J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, v. 17, n. 3, p. 233–247, 1985.

BYSTRZANOWSKA, M. et al. Selection of derivatisation agents for chlorophenols determination with multicriteria decision analysis. Microchemical Journal, v. 145, n. November 2018, p. 664–671, 2019.

CABLES, E. H.; LAMATA, M. T.; VERDEGAY, J. L. Uncertainty Management with Fuzzy and Rough Sets. [s.l.] Springer International Publishing, 2019. v. 377

CABLES, E.; LAMATA, M. T.; VERDEGAY, J. L. RIM-reference ideal method in multicriteria decision making. Information Sciences, v. 337–338, p. 1–10, 2016.

CABLES, E.; LAMATA, M. T.; VERDEGAY, J. L. FRIM—Fuzzy Reference Ideal Method in Multicriteria Decision Making. Soft Computing Applications for Group Decision- making and Consensus Modeling, v. 357, 2018a.

CABLES, E.; LAMATA, M.; VERDEGAY, J. The Reference Ideal Method and the Pythagorean fuzzy numbers. v. 1, p. 31–40, 2018b.

CAINTA, L. D. Extent of use of qualitative and quantitative management techniques in administrative and academic decision-making among elementary and high school principals.

E- International Scientific Research Journal, v. 2, n. 3, p. 220–229, 2010.

CAMBAZOĞLU, S. et al. Geothermal resource assessment of the Gediz Graben utilizing TOPSIS methodology. Geothermics, v. 80, n. January, p. 92–102, 2019.

CHAI, J. .; LIU, J. N. K. .; NGAI, E. W. T. Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 40, n. 10, p. 3872–3885, 2013.

CHAI, N. et al. A Multicriteria Approach for Modeling Small Enterprise Credit Rating: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, v. 55, n. 11, p. 2523–2543, 2019.

CHAVES, M. C. D. C.; JÚNIOR, G. . et al. ELECTRE II multicriteria method to evaluate Formula 1 world championship drivers. Production, v. 20, n. 1, p. 102–113, 2010.

CHEN, C. T. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, v. 114, n. 1, p. 1–9, 2000.

CHEN, C. T.; LIN, C. T.; HUANG, S. F. A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 102, n. 2, p. 289–301, 2006.

DE BOER, L. .; WEGEN, L. VAN DER; TELGEN, J. Outranking methods in support of supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, v. 4, n. 2–3, p. 109– 118, 1998.

EDWARDS, W.; BARRON, F. H. SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, v. 60, p. 306–325, 1996.

FANTINATO, M. Métodos de Pesquisa.

FIGUEIRA, J.; GRECO, S.; EHRGOTT, M. Multiple criteria decision analysis. [s.l.] Springer’s International series, 2005.

FRENCH, S. Decision Theory: An introduction to the Mathematics of Rationality. Chichester: Mathematics and its aplications, 1986.

FÜLÖP, J. Introduction to Decision Making Methods. Operations Research, p. 1–15, 2001.

GALGALI, V. S.; VAIDYA, G. A.; RAMACHANDRAN, M. Selection of distributed generation system using multicriteriadecision making fuzzy TOPSIS optimization. 2016 5th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization,

ICRITO 2016: Trends and Future Directions, n. May, p. 86–89, 2016.

GAO, T. et al. Study of the Competitiveness of Quanzhou Port on the Belt and Road in China Based on a Fuzzy-AHP and ELECTRE III Model. Sustainability, v. 10, n. 4, p. 1–16, 2018.

GARCÍA-CASCALES, M. S.; LAMATA, M. T. On rank reversal and TOPSIS method. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, v. 56, n. 5–6, p. 123–132, 2012.

GARG, N.; VISHESH; MAJI, S. Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach in Selection of Optimal Noise Barrier for Traffic Noise Abatement. Archives of Acoustics, v. 40, n. 4, p. 453–467, 2015.

GENEROWICZ, A. Assessment of waste management technology using BATNEEC options, technology quality method and multi-criteria analysis. Journal of Enviromental Management, v. 92, n. 4, p. 21, 2011.

GIGOVÍC, L. et al. Application of GIS-Interval Rough AHP Methodology for Flood Hazard Mapping in. Water, v. 9, n. 6, p. 1–26, 2017.

GOMES, L. F. A. M. .; GOMES, C. F. S. Tomada de decisão gerencial: enfoque multicritério. São Paulo: Atlas, 2014.

HANINE, M. et al. Decision making under uncertainty using PEES–fuzzy AHP–fuzzy TOPSIS methodology for landfill location selection. Environment Systems and Decisions, v. 36, n. 4, p. 351–367, 2016.

HANSSON, S. Decision Theory: A Brief Introduction. 1. ed. Uppsala: Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Stockholm, 1994.

HARRISON, M. et al. A TOPSIS method for vehicle route selection in seaports-A real case analysis of a container terminal in North West Europe. ICTIS 2015 - 3rd International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety, Proceedings, n. May, p. 599–606, 2015.

HE, Y.; JUNG, H. A Voting TOPSIS Approach for Determining the Priorities of Areas Damaged in Disasters. Sustainability, v. 10, n. 5, p. 1–16, 2018.

HUANG, I. B. .; KEISLER, J.; LINKOV, I. Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Science of the Total Environment, v. 409, n. 19, p. 3578–3594, 2011.

HWANG, C. L.; YOON, K. Multiple attributes decision-making methods and applications. Heidelberg: Springer, 1981.

JAISWAL, A. K. et al. Geospatial multi-criteria decision based site suitability analysis for solid waste disposal using topsis algorithm. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, v. 4, n. 5, p. 431–438, 2018.

JAYASOORIYA, V. M. et al. Multi Criteria Decision Making in Selecting Stormwater Management Green Infrastructure for Industrial areas Part 2: A Case Study with TOPSIS. Water Resources Management, v. 32, n. 13, p. 4297–4312, 2018.

JONES, M. H. Las decisiones del ejecutivo. Eduardo Lobaton [tradução]. [s.l.] México, 1964.

JULIANO, Í. J. Análise de decisão multicritério baseada em teoria da utilidade : uma aplicação na priorização de produtos. [s.l.] Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2017. KAHRAMAN, C. Fuzzy multicriteria decision making: theory and applications with recent developments. Turkey: Springer Science, 2008.

KAISA MIETTINEN. Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Boston: Kluwer’s Internacional series, 1999.

KAUFMANN, A.; GUPTA, M. M. 1991. Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications. Van Nostrand Rein- hold, New York. 2. ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1991.

LAMPUGNANI, C. et al. QUALIDADE DO LEITE CRU REFRIGERADO E CARACTERÍSTICAS DA PRODUÇÃO LEITEIRA NA MESORREGIÃO OESTE PARANAENSE, BRASIL. Rev. Inst. Laticínios Cândido Toste, v. 70, n. 6, p. 301–315, 2015.

LEITÃO, S. P. Capacidade decisória em decisões não-estruturadas: uma proposta. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 27, n. 4, p. 21–35, 1993.

LI, Z. et al. An improved approach for water quality evaluation : TOPSIS-based informative weighting and ranking ( TIWR ) approach. Ecological Indicators, v. 89, n. February, p. 356–364, 2018.

LIAO, H. et al. Green Logistic Provider Selection with a Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Thermodynamic Method Integrating Cumulative Prospect Theory and PROMETHEE. Sustainability, v. 10, n. 4, p. 1–16, 2018.

LIMA JUNIOR, F. R.; CARPINETTI, L. C. R. A multicriteria approach based on Fuzzy-QFD for choosing criteria for supplier selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering, v. 101, p. 269–285, 2016.

linguistic assessment. Applied Soft Computing, v. 21, p. 453–461, 2014.

LU, C. et al. Equipment Selection by using Fuzzy TOPSIS Method Equipment Selection by using Fuzzy TOPSIS Method. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 13, n. 6, p. 1–16, 2016.

MARDANI, A. et al. Using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making approaches for evaluating energy saving technologies and solutions in five star hotels: A new hierarchical framework. Energy, v. 117, n. May, p. 131–148, 2016.

MARQUES, R. F. et al. Uma análise sobre fatores subjetivos que influenciam os processos decisórios nas organizações. [s.l.] Universidade Católica de Brasília, 2019.

MARTIN PETERSON. An Introduction to Decision Theory. Cambridge ed. [s.l.] Cambridge University Press, 2013.

MEDINA-SALAS, L. DE; CASTILLO-GONZ, E.; RAFAEL, M. Analysis of Economical and Environmental Costs for the Selection of Municipal Solid Waste Treatment and Disposal Scenarios through Multicriteria Analysis ( ELECTRE Method ). sustainability, v. 9, n. 11, p. 1–8, 2017.

MENDOZA, G. A. .; MARTINS, H. Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. Forest Ecology and Management, v. 230, n. 3, p. 1–22, 2006.

MESHRAM, I. I.; BOIROJU, N. K.; KODALI, V. Ranking of districts in Andhra Pradesh using women and children nutrition and health indicators by topsis method. Indian Journal of Community Health, v. 29, n. 4, p. 350–356, 2017.

NAJAFABADI, R. M. et al. Identification of natural hazards and classification of urban areas by TOPSIS model (case study: Bandar Abbas city, Iran). Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, v. 7, n. 1, p. 85–100, 2016.

NIKKHAH, A. et al. Application of analytic hierarchy process to develop a weighting scheme for life cycle assessment of agricultural production. Science of the Total Environment, v. 665, p. 538–545, 2019.

OSHIRO, S.; CRNKOVIC, L.; SANTOS, F. C. A. O desafio de integrar cultura organizacional e a gestão da produção. RAU - Revista de Administração da UNIMEP, v. 3, n. 2, p. 26, 2015.

OSTOVARE, M.; SHAHRAKI, M. R. Evaluation of hotel websites using the multicriteria analysis of PROMETHEE and GAIA: Evidence from the five-star hotels of

Mashhad. Tourism Management Perspectives, v. 30, n. August 2018, p. 107–116, 2019. PELEGRINA, G. D.; DUARTE, L. T.; ROMANO, J. M. T. Application of independent component analysis and TOPSIS to deal with dependent criteria in multicriteria decision problems. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 122, p. 262–280, 2019.

PEREIRA, M. J. L. B.; FONSECA, J. G. M. Faces da decisão: as mudanças de paradigmas e o poder da decisão. São Paulo ed. São Paulo: Makron Books, 1997.

PETERS, C. N.; BAROUD, H.; HORNBERGER, G. M. Multicriteria Decision Analysis of Drinking Water Source Selection in Southwestern Bangladesh. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, v. 145, n. 4, p. 05019004, 2019.

PHONPHOTON, N.; PHARINO, C. Multi-criteria decision analysis to mitigate the impact of municipal solid waste management services during floods. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 146, n. March, p. 106–113, 2019.

PRODANOV, C. C.; FREITAS, E. C. DE. Metodologia do Trabalho Científico: Métodos e Técnicas da Pesquisa e do Trabalho Acadêmico. 2o _{ed. Novo Hamburgo: [s.n.].}

PUNYS, P. et al. A multi-criteria analysis for siting surface-flow constructed wetlands in tile-drained agricultural catchments: The case of Lithuania. Agricultural Water Management, v. 213, n. November 2018, p. 1036–1046, 2019.

QARADAGHI, M.; DEASON, J. P. Analysis of MCDM methods output coherence in oil and gas portfolio prioritization. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, v. 8, n. 2, p. 617–640, 2018.

RAHIMDEL, M. J.; KARAMOOZIAN, M. Fuzzy TOPSIS method to primary crusher selection for Golegohar Iron Mine (Iran). Journal of Central South University, v. 21, n. 11, p. 4352–4359, 2014.

REGINA, S. et al. Innovation in the product development process and performance of firm : An experience of value co-creation based on incorporation of technological innovations by the 3D modeling and additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, v. 62, p. 452–457, 2017.

RHEINGANTZ, P. Lógica fuzzy e variáveis lingüísticas aplicadas na avaliação de desempenho de edifícios de escritório. Ambiente Construído, p. 41–55, 2002.

ROGHANIAN, E.; SHEYKHAN, A.; SAYYAD ABENDANKASHI, E. An application of fuzzy TOPSIS to improve the process of supply chain management in the food industries: A case study of protein products manufacturing company. Decision Science Letters, n. May, p. 17–26, 2013.

ROSSONI, C. F. DECISÃO MULTICRITÉRIO - Uma pesquisa experimental para avaliação da percepção dos gestores de MPE acerca do modelo de tomada de decisão multicritério T-ODA quanto a sua aplicabilidade. p. 1–238, 2011.

ROY, B. Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples. RAIRO - Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle, v. 2, p. 57–75, 1968.

ROY, B.; BOUYSSOU, D. Aide multicritereh la decision: methodes et cas. Economica. Edition Ec ed. [s.l: s.n.].

ROY, B.; GIARD, V. E. Méthodologie multicritère d’aide à la décision. Editions E ed. [s.l: s.n.].

STRANTZALI, E. et al. “A decision support approach for evaluating liquefied natural gas supply options: Implementation on Greek case study”. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 222, p. 414–423, 2019.

TAHA, H. A. Pesquisa Operacional: uma visão geral. 8. ed. São Paulo: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008.

THOMAS L. SAATY. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: USA, 1980.

TURRIONI, J. B.; MELLO, C. H. P. Metodologia de pesquisa em engenharia de produção. Universidade Federal de Itajubá - UNIFEI, p. 191, 2012.

WANG, X.; TRIANTAPHYLLOU, E. Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods. Omega, v. 36, n. 1, p. 45–63, 2008.

WANG, Z. et al. Sustainable desalination process selection: Decision support framework under hybrid information. Desalination, v. 465, n. January, p. 44–57, 2019.

WIBOWO, S.; GRANDHI, S. Fuzzy Multicriteria Analysis for Performance Evaluation of Internet-of-Things-Based Supply Chains. Symmetry, v. 10, n. 11, p. 603, 2018.

WU, D. et al. An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model and AHP Weighting Uncertainty Analysis for Sustainability Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Units. sustainability, v. 10, n. 4, p. 1–27, 2018.

YIN, R. Estudo de caso. Planejamento e métodos. 2a edição ed. Porto Alegre/RS: [s.n.]. v. 2

ZAABAR, I.; BEAUREGARD, Y.; PAQUET, M. Using Multicriteria Decision Making Methods to Manage Systems Obsolescence. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, v. 2019- Decem, p. 803–807, 2019.

ZADEH, L. A. Fuzzy Sets *. Information and Control, v. 8, p. 338–353, 1965. ZIMMERMAN, H. J. Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications. 4. ed. [s.l.] Groups, 1992.