Com o conhecimento adquirido ao longo deste trabalho, oportunidades de trabalhos futuros também foram observadas, que serão apresentados a seguir:
1. Estudos específicos podem ser realizados, focando apenas em gerar alterações no modelo de negócio atual, valendo-se de ações estratégicas, bem como, trabalhos que explorem a criação de modelos de negócios novos em um ambiente de exploração, também serão importantes.
2. Estudos que explorem a aplicação da sistemática proposta em organizações com carac- terísticas diferentes do contexto empreendedor apresentado. Evidentemente, fora deste contexto podem ser encontradas barreiras como inércia organizacional e superação da lógica atual do modelo de negócios. Neste sentido, pode ser analisado de que forma tais barreiras impedem o desenvolvimento do procedimento.
e scrum. Tal fato pode auxiliar empresas a se adaptarem mais facilmente ao contexto de inovações em modelos de negócio, por simplesmente estarem integrados já sendo utilizados nas mesmas. Mesmo assim, seria interessante realizar estudos que propusessem outras abordagens a serem integradas à sistemática proposta. Como exemplo, seria possível integrar outros métodos de gestão de desempenho, ou outros métodos de gestão de projetos.
REFERÊNCIAS
ACHTENHAGEN, L.; MELIN, L.; NALDI, L. Dynamics of business models – strategizing, critical capabilities and activities for sustained value creation. Long Range Planning, v. 46, n. 6, p. 427 – 442, 2013. ISSN 0024-6301. Managing Business Models for Innovation, Strategic Change and Value Creation. Disponível em:<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0024630113000198>. Acesso em: 10 de fev. 2014.
ADAMS, R.; BESSANT, J.; PHELPS, R. Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, v. 8, n. 1, p. 21–47, 2006. ISSN 1468-2370. Disponível em:<http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00119.x>. Acesso em: 10 de fev. 2014.
AL-MAGHRABY, R. Project management frameworks: comparative analysis. In: IPMA 2010 World Congress, Istanbul, Turkey. [S.l.: s.n.], 2010.
ALAVI, M.; LEIDNER, D. E. Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota, v. 25, n. 1, p. 107–136, 2001. ISSN 02767783. Disponível em:<http://www.jstor.org/stable/3250961>. Acesso em: 8 de out. 2016.
ALMEIDA, J. F. C. R. Blockbuster-the fall of a giant. Dissertação (Mestrado) — Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisboa, 2011.
AMIT, R.; ZOTT, C. Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., v. 22, n. 6-7, p. 493–520, 2001. ISSN 1097-0266. Disponível em:<http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/smj.187>. Acesso em: 10 de dez. 2015.
APPLEHANS, W.; GLOBE, A.; LAUGERO, G. Managing knowledge: a practical web-based approach. Addison-Wesley, 1999. (Addison-Wesley information technology series). Disponível em:<https://books.google.com.br/books?id=iM\_aAAAAMAAJ>. Acesso em: 17 de jun. 2013. BADEN-FULLER, C.; HAEFLIGER, S. Business models and technological innovation. Long Range Planning, v. 46, n. 6, p. 419 – 426, 2013. ISSN 0024-6301. Managing Business Models for Innovation, Strategic Change and Value Creation. Disponível em:<http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0024630113000691>. Acesso em: 15 de jan. 2014.
BADEN-FULLER, C.; MORGAN, M. S. Business models as models. Long Range Planning, v. 43, n. 2, p. 156 – 171, 2010. ISSN 0024-6301. Business Models. Disponível em: <http: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024630110000117>. Acesso em: 8 de out. 2016. BAREGHEH, A.; ROWLEY, J.; SAMBROOK, S. Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, v. 47, n. 8, p. 1323–1339, 2009.
BATOCCHIO, A.; MINATOGAWA, V. F.; ANHOLON, R. Proposal for a method for business model performance assessment: toward an experimentation tool for business model innovation. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, v. 12, n. 1, p. 61–70, 2017. ISSN 0718-2724. Disponível em:<http://www.jotmi.org/index.php/GT/article/view/2138>. Acesso em: 8 de out. 2017.
BECERRA-FERNANDEZ, R. S. I. Organizational knowledge management: A contingency perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, Routledge, v. 18, n. 1, p. 23–55, 2001. BHATT, G. D. Organizing knowledge in the knowledge development cycle. Journal of knowledge management, MCB UP Ltd, v. 4, n. 1, p. 15–26, 2000.
BIAGIO, L.; BATOCCHIO, A. Plano de negócios: estratégia para micro e pequenas empresas. [S.l.]: Manole, 2005. ISBN 9788520416815.
BITITCI, U. et al. Web enabled performance measurement systems: Management implications. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, v. 22, n. 11, p. 1273–1287, 2002.
BLANK, S. The Four Steps to the Epiphany: Successful Strategies for Products that Win. [S.l.]: Cafepress.com, 2007. ISBN 9780976470700.
BOTELHO, L. L. R.; CUNHA, C. C. de A.; MACEDO, M. O método da revisão integrativa nos estudos organizacionais. Gestão e sociedade, v. 5, n. 11, p. 121–136, 2011.
BOUÇAS, C. Mercado de acessórios deve movimentar US$ 527 bilhões em 2015.
Valor econômico, 2015. Disponível em: <http://www.valor.com.br/empresas/4145974/
mercado-de-acessorios-deve-movimentar-us-527-bilhoes-em-2015>. Acesso em: 19 de mar.
2016.
BOUNCKEN, R. B.; FREDRICH, V. Business model innovation in alliances: Successful confi- gurations. Journal of Business Research, v. 69, n. 9, p. 3584 – 3590, 2016. ISSN 0148-2963. Dis- ponível em:<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296316000175>. Acesso em: 10 de dez. 2015.
BOUNCKEN, R. B.; LEHMANN, C.; FELLNHOFER, K. The role of entrepreneurial orientation and modularity for business model innovation in service companies. Inter- national Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, v. 8, n. 3, p. 237–260, 2016. Disponí- vel em:<https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84987653333&doi=10.1504% 2fIJEV.2016.078973&partnerID=40&md5=830c6e57ac745fefb977207fcb54f4e9>. Acesso em: 8 de out. 2017.
BRANNON, D. L.; WIKLUND, J. An analysis of business models: Firm characteristics, innova- tion and performance. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, Jordan Whitney Enterprises, Inc, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1, 2016.
BRASIL. Lei no12.441, de 11 de julho de 2011. altera a lei no10.406, de 10 de janeiro de 2002 (código civil), para permitir a constituição de empresa individual de responsabilidade limitada. Código Civil, Poder Executivo, Brasılia, DF, 11 jul. 2011. Art. 980-A.
BRAUDE, E.; BERNSTEIN, M. Software Engineering: Modern Approaches, Second Edition. [S.l.]: John Wiley, 2016. ISBN 9781478633037.
BRENNER, W.; UEBERNICKEL, F.; ABRELL, T. Design thinking as mindset, process, and to- olbox. In: BRENNER, W.; UEBERNICKEL, F. (Ed.). Design Thinking for Innovation: Research and Practice. [S.l.]: Springer International Publishing, 2016. p. 3–21. ISBN 978-3-319-26100-3.
BRYMAN, A. Research Methods and Organization Studies (Contemporary Social Research). [S.l.]: Routledge, 1989. ISBN 0415084040.
BUCHERER, E.; EISERT, U.; GASSMANN, O. Towards systematic business model innova- tion: Lessons from product innovation management. Creativity and Innovation Management, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, v. 21, n. 2, p. 183–198, 2012. ISSN 1467-8691.
BURMEISTER, C.; LUETTGENS, D.; PILLER, F. T. Business Model Innovation for Industrie 4.0: Why the ’Industrial Internet’ Mandates a New Perspective on Innovation. [S.l.], 2016. RWTH-TIM Working Paper. Disponível em:<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=2571033>. Acesso em: 8 de out. 2017.
CAMPAGNOLO, D.; CAMUFFO, A. The concept of modularity in management studies: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, v. 12, n. 3, p. 259–283, 2010. ISSN 1468-2370.
CARLUCCI, D.; MARR, B.; SCHIUMA, G. The knowledge value chain: how intellectual capital impacts on business performance. International Journal of Technology Management, Inderscience Publishers, v. 27, n. 6-7, p. 575–590, 2004.
CARR, A. Blockbuster Bankruptcy: a decade of decline. Fast Company, 2012. Disponível em: <https://www.fastcompany.com/1690654/blockbuster-bankruptcy-decade-decline>. Acesso em: 17 de jun. 2013.
CASADESUS-MASANELL, R.; RICART, J. E. From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, v. 43, n. 2, p. 195 – 215, 2010. ISSN 0024-6301. Business Mo- dels. Disponível em:<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024630110000051>. Acesso em: 15 de jan. 2014.
CASADESUS-MASANELL, R.; ZHU, F. Business model innovation and competitive imitation: The case of sponsor-based business models. Strategic Management Journal, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, v. 34, n. 4, p. 464–482, 2013. ISSN 1097-0266.
CAVALCANTE, S.; KESTING, P.; ULHøI, J. Business model dynamics and innovation: (re)establishing the missing linkages. Management Decision, v. 49, n. 8, p. 1327–1342, 2011. CERTO, S.; PETER, J. Administração estratégica. [S.l.]: PRENTICE HALL BRASIL, 2005. ISBN 9788576050254.
CHECKLAND, P.; HOLWELL, S. Action research: Its nature and validity. Systemic Practice and Action Research, v. 11, n. 1, p. 9–21, Feb 1998. ISSN 1573-9295.
CHEN, E. L.; KATILA, R. Rival interpretations of balancing exploration and exploitation: simultaneous or sequential. Handbook of technology and innovation management, John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, p. 197–214, 2008.
CHESBROUGH, H. Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plan- ning, v. 43, n. 2, p. 354 – 363, 2010. ISSN 0024-6301. Business Models. Disponível em: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024630109000569>. Acesso em: 17 de jun.
CHESBROUGH, H.; ROSENBLOOM, R. S. The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from xerox corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and corporate change, Oxford University Press, v. 11, n. 3, p. 529–555, 2002. Acesso em: 17 de jun. 2013.
CHESBROUGH, H. W. Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Manage- ment Review, v. 48, n. 2, p. 22–28, Winter 2007. Disponível em:<https://search.proquest.com/ docview/224969217?accountid=8113>.
CHIARONI, D.; CHIESA, V.; FRATTINI, F. The open innovation journey: How firms dyna- mically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm. Technovation, v. 31, n. 1, p. 34 – 43, 2011. ISSN 0166-4972. Open Innovation - ISPIM Selected Papers. Disponível em: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497209001400>. Acesso em: 3 de jul.
2016.
CHIZZOTTI, A. Pesquisa qualitativa em ciências humanas e sociais. [S.l.]: Vozes, 2006. ISBN 9788532633903.
CHOU, S.-W.; HE, M.-Y. Knowledge management: The distinctive roles of knowledge assets in facilitating knowledge creation. Journal of Information Science, Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA, v. 30, n. 2, p. 146–164, 2004.
CHRISTENSEN, C. M.; BARTMAN, T.; BEVER, D. van. The hard truth about business model innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, v. 58, n. 1, p. 31–40, Fall 2016. Disponível em: <https://search.proquest.com/docview/1832180944?accountid=8113>. Acesso em: 8 de out.
2017.
CLARKE, T.; ROLLO, C. Corporate initiatives in knowledge management. Education + Training, v. 43, n. 4/5, p. 206–214, 2001.
COGHLAN, D.; BRANNICK, T. Doing action research in your own organization. terceira. London: Sage, 2010.
COHEN, L.; MANION, L.; MORRISON, K. Research Methods in Education. [S.l.]: Taylor & Francis, 2017. ISBN 9781315456515.
COLTMAN, T. et al. E-business: revolution, evolution, or hype? California Management Review, SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, v. 44, n. 1, p. 57–86, 2001.
COOPER, B.; VLASKOVITS, P. The Entrepreneur’s Guide to Customer Development: A "cheat Sheet"to the Four Steps to the Epiphany. [S.l.]: Cooper-Vlaskovits, 2010. ISBN 9780982743607. COUGHLAN, P.; COGHLAN, D. Action research for operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 22, n. 2, p. 220–240, 2002.
DASILVA, C. M.; TRKMAN, P. Business model: What it is and what it is not. Long Range Planning, v. 47, n. 6, p. 379 – 389, 2014. ISSN 0024-6301. Disponível em: <http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024630113000502>. Acesso em: 10 de dez. 2015. DAVENPORT, T. Reengenharia de processo: como inovar na empresa através da tecnologia da informação. [S.l.]: Campus, 1994. ISBN 9788570018748.
DENZIN, N. K.; LINCOLN, Y. S. Planejamento da Pesquisa Qualitativa: teorias e abordagens. segunda. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2006.
DESHPANDE, R. "paradigms lost": On theory and method in research in marketing. Journal of Marketing, American Marketing Association, v. 47, n. 4, p. 101–110, 1983. ISSN 00222429. Disponível em:<http://www.jstor.org/stable/1251403>. Acesso em: 19 de mar. 2016.
DICK, B.; STRINGER, E.; HUXHAM, C. Theory in action research. Action Research, v. 7, n. 1, p. 5–12, 2009.
DODGSON, M.; GANN, D.; SALTER, A. The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of procter & gamble. R&D Management, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, v. 36, n. 3, p. 333–346, 2006. ISSN 1467-9310.
DOZ, Y. L.; KOSONEN, M. Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelera- ting business model renewal. Long Range Planning, v. 43, n. 2, p. 370 – 382, 2010. ISSN 0024-6301. Business Models. Disponível em:<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0024630109000570>. Acesso em: 15 de jan. 2014.
DRAGOS, S. M. Why google analytics cannot be used for educational web content. In: 2011 7th International Conference on Next Generation Web Services Practices. [S.l.: s.n.], 2011. p. 113–118.
DRUCKER, P. The theory of the business. Harvard Business Review, 1994. Disponível em: <https://hbr.org/1994/09/the-theory-of-the-business>. Acesso em: 17 de jun. 2013.
DUBOSSON-TORBAY, M.; OSTERWALDER, A.; PIGNEUR, Y. E-business model design, classification, and measurements. Thunderbird International Business Review, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., v. 44, n. 1, p. 5–23, 2002. ISSN 1520-6874.
DYBÅ, T.; DINGSØYR, T. Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, v. 50, n. 9, p. 833 – 859, 2008. ISSN 0950- 5849. Disponível em:<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584908000256>. Acesso em: 15 de jan. 2014.
EDEN, C.; HUXHAM, C. Action research for management research. British Journal of Manage- ment, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, v. 7, n. 1, p. 75–86, 1996. ISSN 1467-8551.
EHRENHARD, M. et al. Unlocking how start-ups create business value with mobile applications: Development of an app-enabled business innovation cycle. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 115, p. 26 – 36, 2017. ISSN 0040-1625. Disponível em:<http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S004016251630292X>. Acesso em: 10 de fev. 2018.
EICHEN, S. F. von den; FREILING, J.; MATZLER, K. Why business model innovations fail. Journal of Business Strategy, v. 36, n. 6, p. 29–38, 2015.
EPPLER, M. J.; HOFFMANN, F. Strategies for business model innovation: Challenges and visual solutions for strategic business model innovation. In: . Strategy and Communication for Innovation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. p. 3–14. ISBN 978-3-642- 41479-4.
EUCHNER, J.; GANGULY, A. Business model innovation in practice. Research-Technology Management, Routledge, v. 57, n. 6, p. 33–39, 2014. Disponível em:<https://www.tandfonline. com/doi/abs/10.5437/08956308X5706013>. Acesso em: 3 de jul. 2016.
FONTANA, R. M. et al. Management ambidexterity: A clue for maturing in agile software development. In: LASSENIUS, C.; DINGSØYR, T.; PAASIVAARA, M. (Ed.). Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. p. 199–204. ISBN 978-3-319-18612-2.
FOSS, N. J.; SAEBI, T. Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go? Journal of Management, v. 43, n. 1, p. 200–227, 2017. FRANCO, M. A. S. Pedagogia da pesquisa-ação. Educação e pesquisa, SciELO Brasil, v. 31, n. 3, 2005.
FRANKENBERGER, K. et al. The 4i-framework of business model innovation: A structured view on process phases and challenges. International Journal of Product Development, v. 18, n. 3-4, p. 249–273, 2013.
GAMBARDELLA, A.; MCGAHAN, A. M. Business-model innovation: General purpose tech- nologies and their implications for industry structure. Long Range Planning, v. 43, n. 2, p. 262 – 271, 2010. ISSN 0024-6301. Business Models. Disponível em:<http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0024630109000594>. Acesso em: 10 de jul. 2012.
GÄRTNER, C.; SCHÖN, O. Modularizing business models: between strategic flexibility and path dependence. Journal of Strategy and Management, v. 9, n. 1, p. 39–57, 2016. ISSN 1755-425X. GEORGE, G.; BOCK, A. J. The business model in practice and its implications for entrepre- neurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Blackwell Publishing Inc, v. 35, n. 1, p. 83–111, 2011. ISSN 1540-6520.
GERHARDT, T. E.; SILVEIRA, D. T. Métodos de pesquisa. [S.l.]: Plageder, 2009.
GIBSON, C.; BIRKINSHAW, J. Building ambidexterity into an organization topic: Leadership and organizational studies. Reprint 45408, n. 4, p. 47–55, 2004.
GIL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 5o. ed. São Paulo: Editora Atlas, 2010. GOLDENBERG, M. A arte de pesquisar. [S.l.]: Record, 2011. ISBN 9788501096807.
GONZALEZ, R. V. D.; MARTINS, M. F. O Processo de Gestão do Conhecimento: uma pesquisa teórico-conceitual. Gestão e Produção, scielo, v. 24, p. 248 – 265, 06 2017. ISSN 0104-530X. Disponível em:<http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid= S0104-530X2017000200248&nrm=iso>. Acesso em: 3 de dez. 2017.
GRONUM, S.; STEEN, J.; VERREYNNE, M.-L. Business model design and innovation: Unloc- king the performance benefits of innovation. Australian Journal of Management, v. 41, n. 3, p. 585–605, 2016.
GROVER, V.; PURVIS, R. L.; SEGARS, A. H. Exploring ambidextrous innovation tenden- cies in the adoption of telecommunications technologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, v. 54, n. 2, p. 268–285, May 2007. ISSN 0018-9391.
GUBA, E.; LINCOLN, Y. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: DENZIN, N.; LINCOLN, Y. (Ed.). Handbook of QualitativeResearch. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 1994. p. 105–117.
GUDIKSEN, S. Business model design games: Rules and procedures to challenge assumptions and elicit surprises. Creativity and Innovation Management, v. 24, n. 2, p. 307–322, 2015. ISSN 1467-8691.
GUERINI, M.; STRAPPARAVA, C.; STOCK, O. Evaluation metrics for persuasive nlp with google adwords. In: CHAIR), N. C. C. et al. (Ed.). Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10). Valletta, Malta: European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 2010. ISBN 2-9517408-6-7.
GUPTA, A. K.; SMITH, K. G.; SHALLEY, C. E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of management journal, Academy of Management, v. 49, n. 4, p. 693–706, 2006.
GUSTAVSEN, B. Action research, practical challenges and the formation of theory. Action Research, v. 6, n. 4, p. 421–437, 2008.
HAI, G.; JING, Z.; JINTONG, T. The role of top managers’ human and social capital in business model innovation. Chinese Management Studies, v. 7, n. 3, p. 447–469, 2013. ISSN 1750-614X. HALL, R. Organizações: estruturas, processos e resultados. [S.l.]: PRENTICE HALL BRASIL, 2004. ISBN 9788587918765.
HAMEL, G.; VÄLIKANGAS, L. The quest for resilience. Harvard business review, v. 81, n. 9, p. 52–63, 2003.
HAMERMESH, R. G.; MARSHALL, P. W.; PIRMOHAMED, T. Note on business model analysis for the entrepreneur. [S.l.]: Harvard Business School, 2005.
HAMMER, M.; CHAMPY, J. Reengenharia: revolucionando a empresa em função dos cli- entes, da concorrencia e das grandes mudanças da gerencia. [S.l.]: Campus, 1994. ISBN 9788570018489.
HAO-CHEN, H. et al. Overcoming organizational inertia to strengthen business model innovation: An open innovation perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management, v. 26, n. 6, p. 977–1002, 2013. ISSN 0953-4814.
HEALY, M.; PERRY, C. Comprehensive criteria to judge validity and reliability of qualitative research within the realism paradigm. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, v. 3, n. 3, p. 118–126, 2000.
HEFFNER, J. L. et al. Overcoming recruitment challenges of web-based interventions for tobacco use: the case of web-based acceptance and commitment therapy for smoking cessation. Addictive behaviors, Elsevier, v. 38, n. 10, p. 2473–2476, 2013. Disponível em:<https://www.
HERBES, C. et al. Responding to policy change: New business models for renewable energy cooperatives – barriers perceived by cooperatives’ members. Energy Policy, v. 109, p. 82–95, 2017.
HERR, K.; ANDERSON, G. L. The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. [S.l.]: Sage publications, 2014.
HOCK, M.; CLAUSS, T.; SCHULZ, E. The impact of organizational culture on a firm’s capability to innovate the business model. R&D Management, v. 46, n. 3, p. 433–450, 2016. ISSN 1467- 9310.
HOUAISS, A. Dicionário Houaiss da Língua Portuguesa. [S.l.]: Editora Objetiva, 2001. HUNG, S.-C.; LAI, J.-Y. When innovations meet chaos: Analyzing the technology development of printers in 1976–2012. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, v. 42, p. 31 – 45, 2016. ISSN 0923-4748. Disponível em:<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0923474816300911>. Acesso em: 9 de abr. 2017.
JENSEN, A. Is doing two things at once doing neither? exploring the role of firm ambidexterity on innovation speed (summary). Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, v. 34, n. 9, p. 3, 2014. JOHNSON, M. Seizing the White Space: Business Model Innovation for Growth and Renewal. [S.l.]: Harvard Business Press, 2010. (Economia e discipline aziendali). ISBN 9781422124819. KAPLAN, R.; NORTON, D. A estratégia em ação: balanced scorecard. [S.l.]: ELSEVIER EDITORA, 1997. ISBN 9788535201499.
KAPLAN, R.; NORTON, D. Mapas estratégicos: convertendo ativos intangíveis em resultados tangíveis. [S.l.]: Elsevier, 2004. ISBN 9788535212686.
KARLSSON, N. P. E. et al. Success factors for agricultural biogas production in sweden: A case study of business model innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 142, p. 2925–2934, 2017. KESTING, P.; GÜNZEL-JENSEN, F. Smes and new ventures need business model sophistication. Business Horizons, v. 58, n. 3, p. 285 – 293, 2015. ISSN 0007-6813. Disponível em: <http: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681315000038>. Acesso em: 19 de mar. 2016. KHANAGHA, S.; VOLBERDA, H.; OSHRI, I. Business model renewal and ambidexterity: structural alteration and strategy formation process during transition to a cloud business model. R&D Management, v. 44, n. 3, p. 322–340, 2014. ISSN 1467-9310.
KIJL, B.; BOERSMA, D. Developing a business model engineering and experimentation tool-the quest for scalable’lollapalooza confluence patterns’. In: AMCIS. [S.l.: s.n.], 2010. p. 567. KLANG, D.; WALLNöFER, M.; HACKLIN, F. The business model paradox: A systematic review and exploration of antecedents. International Journal of Management Reviews, v. 16, n. 4, p. 454–478, 2014. ISSN 1468-2370.
KOERICH, M. S. et al. Pesquisa-ação: ferramenta metodológica para a pesquisa qualitativa. Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem, v. 11, n. 3, p. 717–23, 2009.
KWON, J.-Y.; PHILLIPS, J. C.; CURRIE, L. M. Appreciating the persona paradox: lessons from participatory design sessions with hiv+ gay men. In: Nursing Informatics. [S.l.: s.n.], 2014. p. 133–139.
LAKATOS, E. M.; MARCONI, M. d. A. Fundamentos de metodologia cientifica. 5o. ed. Sao Paulo: Editora Atlas, 2003.
LAMBERT, S. C. The importance of classification to business model research. Journal of Business Models, Aalborg Universitet, v. 3, n. 1, p. 49, 2015.
LAUDIEN, S. M.; DAXBöCK, B. Business model innovation processes of average market players: a qualitative-empirical analysis. R and D Management, v. 47, n. 3, p. 420–430, 2017. ISSN 1467-9310.
LAWSON, B. et al. Knowledge sharing in interorganizational product development teams: The effect of formal and informal socialization mechanisms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Wiley Online Library, v. 26, n. 2, p. 156–172, 2009.
LEE, S. M.; HONG, S. An enterprise-wide knowledge management system infrastructure. Industrial Management & Data Systems, v. 102, n. 1, p. 17–25, 2002.
LEWIN, K. Resolving social conflicts. [S.l.]: Harper And Row; New York, 1945.
LIKER, J.; HOSEUS, M. Toyota Culture: The Heart and Soul of the Toyota Way. [S.l.]: McGraw- Hill Education, 2008. ISBN 9780071712576.
LINDGARDT, Z. et al. Business model innovation: When the game gets tough, change the
game. In: . Own the Future. [S.l.]: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2012. p. 291–298. ISBN
9781119204084.
LINTON, J. D. De-babelizing the language of innovation. Technovation, v. 29, n. 11, p. 729 – 737, 2009. ISSN 0166-4972. Disponível em:<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0166497209000595>. Acesso em: 14 de mai. 2016.
LIST, D. Action research cycles for multiple futures perspectives. Futures, v. 38, n. 6, p. 673 – 684, 2006. ISSN 0016-3287. Futures studies and action research. Disponível em:<http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328705001710>. Acesso em: 25 de ago. 2016. MAGNIER-WATANABE, R.; SENOO, D. Organizational characteristics as prescriptive factors of knowledge management initiatives. Journal of knowledge management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, v. 12, n. 1, p. 21–36, 2008.
MAGRETTA, J. Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review, 2002.
MAHADEVAN, B. Business models for internet-based e-commerce: An anatomy. California Management Review, v. 42, n. 4, p. 55–69, 2000.
MANGAN, J.; LALWANI, C.; GARDNER, B. Combining quantitative and qualitative methodo- logies in logistics research. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Manage- ment, v. 34, n. 7, p. 565–578, 2004.
MARKIDES, C. C. Business model innovation: What can the ambidexterity literature teach us? The Academy of Management Perspectives, Academy of Management, v. 27, n. 4, p. 313–323, 2013.
MARTINS, L. L.; RINDOVA, V. P.; GREENBAUM, B. E. Unlocking the hidden value of concepts: A cognitive approach to business model innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, v. 9, n. 1, p. 99–117, 2015. ISSN 1932-443X.
MATZLER, K. et al. Business model innovation: coffee triumphs for nespresso. Journal of Business Strategy, v. 34, n. 2, p. 30–37, 2013.
MAURYA, A. Running Lean: Iterate from Plan A to a Plan That Works. [S.l.]: O’Reilly Media, Incorporated, 2012. (Lean (O’Reilly)). ISBN 9781449305178.
MCGRATH, R. G. Business models: A discovery driven approach. Long Range Planning, v. 43, n. 2, p. 247 – 261, 2010. ISSN 0024-6301. Business Models. Disponível em: <http: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024630109000508>. Acesso em: 17 de jun. 2013. MELLO, C. H. P. et al. Pesquisa-ação na engenharia de produção: proposta de estruturação para sua condução. Production, SciELO Brasil, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1–13, 2012.
MENDES, K. D. S.; SILVEIRA, R. C. d. C. P.; GALVãO, C. M. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto e Contexto - Enfermagem, scielo, v. 17, p. 758 – 764, 12 2008. ISSN 0104-0707. Disponível em:<http://www. scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-07072008000400018&nrm=iso>. Acesso em: 18 de jul. 2012.
MENEGUETI, M. et al. Dimensionamento de pessoal de enfermagem nos serviços hospitalares: revisão integrativa da literatura. Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem, v. 15, n. 2, p. 551–63, 2013. ISSN 1518-1944. Disponível em:<https://www.revistas.ufg.br/fen/article/view/18559>. Acesso em: 23 de set. 2015.
MEZGER, F. Toward a capability-based conceptualization of business model innovation: insights