• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Is early virological response as predictive of the hepatitis C treatment response in dialysis patients as in non-uremic patients?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "Is early virological response as predictive of the hepatitis C treatment response in dialysis patients as in non-uremic patients?"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texto

(1)

Is

early

virological

response

as

predictive

of

the

hepatitis

C

treatment

response

in

dialysis

patients

as

in

non-uremic

patients?

Patricia

da

Silva

Fucuta

Pereira

*

,

Silvia

Naomi

de

Oliveira

Uehara,

Renata

de

Mello

Perez,

Ana

Cristina

Amaral

Feldner,

Isaura

Cunha

de

Melo,

Ivonete

Sandra

de

Souza

e

Silva,

Antonio

Eduardo

Benedito

Silva,

Maria

Lucia

Gomes

Ferraz

DivisionofGastroenterology,HepatitisSection,FederalUniversityofSa˜oPaulo,Sa˜oPaulo,Brazil

1. Introduction

Although the adoption of universalprecaution methods has reduced the transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) among hemodialysis patients,1 the prevalence of this infection has

remained high in these patients compared to the general population.TheprevalenceofHCVinfectionalsovariesaccording to geographic region; the rates are less than 5% in northern Europeancountries,2approximately8%intheUSA,3andashighas

70%inSaudiArabia.4Inaddition,theprevalenceofthisinfection

varieswidelybetweendialysiscentersinthesamecountry. InBrazil,theBrazilianSocietyofNephrologyhasconductedan annualcensusofpatientsondialysistherapysincethebeginningof thiscentury.Datafromthe2010census,recentlyreported,5show

that340ofthe638activedialysiscentersansweredthesurvey questionsandinformationwasobtainedfor49077patientsofthe 92091 estimated total number of patients on dialysis in the country.TheprevalenceofHCVinfectionamongdialysisunitswas

5.8%,andfortunatelyithasbeendeclining–theprevalencewas 19.9%in1999.6

The treatment of HCV in patients under renal replacement therapyisofcriticalimportance.TheimpactofchronichepatitisC infectionin these patients is high, as recent observationshave documentedagreaterprobabilityofdeathduetolivercirrhosis, hepatocarcinoma,andcardiovasculardiseaseindialysispatients infected withHCVcompared touninfected subjects.7,8

Further-more,alargecohortstudythatcomparedthefrequencyofcancer amongdialysispatientstothatofthegeneralpopulationfounda higheroverallriskforcancerinthesepatients,whichincludedthe riskoflivercancerattributabletoexposuretohepatitisBandC viruses.9Severepost-transplantcomplicationsof HCVinfection,

suchasglomerulopathies,lossofrenalgrafts,10,11andareduced

10- and 20-year survival rate,12,13 have been demonstrated in

HCV-positive kidney transplanted patients. In addition, kidney transplantedpatientswithhepatitisCshowedhighermorbidity and mortality due toliver diseasethan didimmunocompetent patientswithhepatitisC.14

Asthepost-transplantadministrationof interferon(IFN)has been associated with the risk of renal graft loss,15–17 its

administrationisgenerallynotrecommended.18Instead,allefforts

shouldbemadetoeradicatetheinfectionbeforerenaltransplant.

InternationalJournalofInfectiousDiseases17(2013)e50–e53

ARTICLE INFO

Articlehistory: Received30April2012

Receivedinrevisedform23August2012 Accepted3September2012

CorrespondingEditor:MarkHolodniy, California,USA

Keywords: Dialysis HepatitisC HCVRNA Interferon Predictivevalue

SUMMARY

Objective:TheaimofthepresentstudywastodeterminewhetherhepatitisCvirus(HCV)RNApresentat week12isagoodpredictoroftheresponsetointerferon(IFN)monotherapyinhemodialysispatients withhepatitisC.

Methods:HemodialysispatientswithhepatitisCwhoweretreatedbetween1997and2008withIFN monotherapyfor48weekswithoutdosereductionwereincluded.ThepredictivevalueofHCVRNAat week12forachievingasustainedvirologicalresponse(SVR)wasdetermined.

Results:Fortypatients(meanage479years;75%malesand80%withgenotype1)wereincluded.Septal fibrosisorcirrhosiswasobservedin38%ofthesepatients.Twelve(30%)ofthe40patientsachievedSVR.HCV RNAwasundetectableatweek12in68%.ThepositivepredictivevalueofHCVRNAatweek12was45%and thenegativepredictivevaluewas100%.

Conclusions: ThepresenceofHCVRNA atweek 12had ahighnegativepredictivevalueforSVRin hemodialysispatientswithchronichepatitisCtreatedwithIFNfor48weeks.Therefore,ifHCVRNAis detectedatweek12,treatment shouldbediscontinued dueto thelowprobability ofasustained response.

ß2012InternationalSocietyforInfectiousDiseases.PublishedbyElsevierLtd.Allrightsreserved.

*Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+551731216965.

E-mailaddress:[email protected](P.d.S.FucutaPereira).

ContentslistsavailableatSciVerseScienceDirect

International

Journal

of

Infectious

Diseases

j o urn a l hom e pa ge : ww w. e l s e v i e r. c om/ l o ca t e / i j i d

1201-9712/$36.00–seefrontmatterß2012InternationalSocietyforInfectiousDiseases.PublishedbyElsevierLtd.Allrightsreserved.

(2)

Accordingtoarecentmeta-analysis,19theestimatedsustained

virologicalresponse(SVR;i.e.,nodetectableHCVRNAat24weeks after cessation of therapy) rate for hemodialysispatients who received conventional IFN monotherapy was 39%, which was greater than that estimated for immunocompetent patients. However,thelowtoleranceofthesepatientstoIFNmayleadto high rates of treatment discontinuation.20 Despite the large

number of studiesevaluating thepredictivevalue of HCVRNA duringtheearlystagesoftreatment(weeks4to12)forasustained responseinnon-uremicpatients,21,22thisparameterhasnotbeen

establishedinhemodialysispatients.Thisanalysiswouldbeuseful becauseofthelowtoleranceofthesepatientstotreatment.

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the predictive value of HCV RNA at week 12 in dialysis patients treatedwithconventionalIFNfor48weeks.

2. Methods

2.1. Patients

Aretrospectivestudywasconductedonhemodialysispatients withchronichepatitisC(anti-HCVreactiveandHCVRNA-positive) whowereattendedattheHepatitisUnitoftheFederalUniversity of Sa˜o Paulo between 1997 and 2008. Patients treated with conventionalIFN monotherapyfor48 weeksand whohadHCV RNAtestsatweek12oftreatmentandatweek24post-treatment wereselectedforthisstudy.

PatientsinfectedwithHIV and/orhepatitisBvirusandthose previously treated for hepatitis C or who had their treatment discontinuedwereexcluded.

Thestudywasapprovedbythelocalethicscommitteeandwas conductedinaccordancewiththeDeclarationofHelsinki.

2.2. VariablesanalyzedanddeterminationofHCVRNA

Thefollowingvariableswereanalyzed:gender,age,etiologyof chronicrenaldisease,typeofdialysis,historyofkidney transplan-tation,timeon dialysis,estimatedduration ofinfection,alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, stage of hepatic fibrosis, HCV genotype,andthepresenceofHCVRNAatweek12oftreatment and at week 24 post-treatment. The duration of infection was estimatedbasedonthefirstyearofdialysisortheyearofthefirst bloodtransfusionifbefore1992.

The HCV RNA content of stored serum samples (freezer temperature 208C)wasdeterminedbyqualitative PCR(Cobas Amplicor HCV Test, Roche Diagnostic Systems, USA) using a detectionlimitof50IU/ml.TheHCVgenotypewasdeterminedby sequencingofthe50-untranslatedregion.23

2.3. Therapeuticregimen

Treatment was indicated for patients whose liver biopsies showedinterfacehepatitisand/orthepresenceofstage2fibrosis, accordingtotheMetavirclassification.24Thetherapeuticregimen

consisted of conventional IFN alpha-2a or IFN alpha-2b (3000000IU,threetimes perweek)for48 weeks,which inall caseswasadministeredfollowingdialysissessions.

2.4. Evaluationofvirologicalresponse

Anearlyvirological response(EVR) toantiviral treatment is usuallydefinedaspartial(pEVR)whena 100-folddecreasein viralloadoccursatweek12,andascomplete(cEVR)whenHCV RNAatweek12isundetectable.InthepresentstudytheEVRwas evaluated by qualitative HCV RNA level at week 12 (cEVR). QualitativedeterminationofHCVRNA24weeksaftertherapywas

used for analysis of SVR. Per-protocol analysis was used to determinetheresponserate.

2.5. Statisticalanalysis

Adescriptiveanalysisofthevariablesofinterestwasperformed and the association between variables was determined. When indicated,categoricalvariableswerecomparedusingFisher’sexact test. Thepositive andnegativepredictivevalues ofHCVRNAat week12forSVRwerecalculated.Alevelofsignificanceof<0.05

wasused.PASW18.0software(SPSS,Inc.,Chicago,IL,USA)was usedforthestatisticalanalysis.

3. Results

Atotalof113patientsweretreatedduringthestudyperiodand 40 ofthesefulfilledtheinclusioncriteria.Theother73patients were excluded from the study due to an early interruption/ abandonment of treatment or a dose reduction in 31 patients (42%),theabsenceofserumforanalysisatweek12in24patients (33%),andthepresenceofHBVco-infectionin18patients(25%). Therewasnodifferencebetweenexcludedandincludedpatients regarding age, time on dialysis, stage of fibrosis, or genotype distribution.

The meanage ofthe40 patients included inthe studywas 479years,andthemajorityofpatientsweremale(75%).Thetime ondialysisrangedfrom1to19years(medianof6years),andthe main causeofknown chronicrenal disease wassystemic arterial hypertension.

AccordingtotheMetavirclassificationforthestagingofhepatic fibrosisonbiopsy,itwasabsentin5%ofpatients(stage0),57% patientshadstage1,15%hadstage2,13%hadstage3,and10%had stage4.Thepretreatmentepidemiological,clinical,andlaboratory characteristicsofthepatientsareshowninTable1.

3.1. HCVRNAatweek12andthesustainedvirologicalresponse

HCVRNAwasundetectableatweek12in27patients(68%),and theoverallSVRratewas30%(12/40).AccordingtoHCVgenotyping performedin26patients,SVRwas24%ingenotype1,andtheonly

Table1

Baselinedemographicandclinicalcharacteristicsofthestudypatients(n=40)

Characteristics

Age,years,meanSD 479

Malegender,n(%) 30(75)

Hemodialysis/peritonealdialysis,n 38/2 Timeondialysis,years,median(IQR) 6(4–7) Previouskidneytransplant,n(%) 11(28) Etiologyofkidneydisease,n(%)

Hypertension 14(35)

Glomerulonephritis 3(8)

Diabetesmellitus 2(5)

Other/unknown 21(52)

DurationofHCVinfection,years,median(IQR) 8(6–14) HCVgenotype,n(%)

Type1 21(80)

Type2 1(4)

Type3 2(8)

Type4 1(4)

Type5 1(4)

Liverhistology,n(%)

Bridgingfibrosisorcirrhosis 15(38)

ALT(ULN),median(IQR) 1.02(0.62–1.63)

Hemoglobin(g/dl),meanSD 121.5

Plateletcount(109/l) 183.02572.318

ALT,alanineaminotransferase;HCV,hepatitisCvirus;IQR,interquartilerange;SD, standarddeviation;ULN,upperlimitofnormal.

(3)

five patients with genotype non-1 were non-responders (one genotype2,twogenotype3,onegenotype4,andonegenotype5). Forty-fivepercentofpatientswithnegativeHCVRNAatweek 12achievedSVR.However,noneofthepatientswithdetectable HCVRNAatweek12hadSVR(p=0.004),asshowninFigure1.Thus thecEVRhad a negative predictivevalue (NPV)of 100% and a positivepredictivevalue(PPV)of45%.

4. Discussion

This study showedthat detectable HCV RNAat week 12 of treatmenthadahighNPV(100%)forSVRindialysispatientswith chronichepatitisCgiven conventionalIFN monotherapy for 48 weeks.HCVRNAwasevaluatedqualitativelyatweek12,asthisis theconventionalstrategyusedtoevaluatetheearlyresponseto IFNmonotherapy.25ThisanalysisisimportantbecausehepatitisC

dialysis patients require a special therapeutic approach. The consequencesofchronicHCVinfectioninthispopulation,which include decreased survival during the post-transplant period, enforce the need to eradicate the virus. However, prolonged therapycancauseseveresideeffectsandcannegativelyimpactthe stabilityofthesepatients.

ThelowtoleranceofpatientswithrenalfailuretohepatitisC treatmenthasbeen establishedand maybedue tothegreater bioavailability of the drug or associations with co-morbid-ities.20,26–28InthestudybyRochaetal.,20mildtomoderateside

effectsofIFN therapy wereobservedin almostallpatients and includedflu-likesymptoms,bonemarrowsuppression,diarrhea, depression, dermatological alterations such as hair loss and itching,infections,andhypothyroidism.Furthermore,severeside effectsthatresultedinthediscontinuationoftreatmentwereseen in24%ofthepatients.Severesideeffectswerealsothecauseof earlytreatment interruption in 19 of 37 hemodialysis patients treatedwithconventionalIFNtherapy.26

Thesixmeta-analysesregardingtheefficacyandtoleranceof IFNtreatmentindialysispatientswithchronichepatitisCconfirm thelowtoleranceofthispopulation.Inearly2000,twoofthese studies29,30demonstratedahighrateoftreatmentdiscontinuation

duetosideeffects(30%and17%,respectively).Thesedatawere later confirmedby further meta-analyses conductedby Fabrizi etal.19andGordonetal.31thatreporteddropoutratesof19%and

26%,respectively.Inthemostrecentmeta-analysesbyAlavianand Tabatabaei32andFabrizietal.,33thereweredropoutratesof29.7%

and23%,respectively,followingpeginterferontherapy.

DespitemajoradvancesinthetreatmentofchronichepatitisC in thelast decade, approximately a half of immunocompetent patientsdonotachievesustainedeliminationoftheviruswiththe current recommended therapeutic regimen (peginterferon and ribavirin).34Furthermore,this proportionisevengreater(about

60%)amongdialysispatientsgivenpegylatedorconventionalIFN monotherapy.19

The factors associated with a positive response to antiviral treatmenthavebeenextensivelystudiedinpatientswithnormal renalfunctionandincludeHCVgenotype,stageofhepaticfibrosis, race, presence of steatosis/insulin resistance,35–39 treatment

compliance,ribavirindose,40,41andviralkinetics.35

Overthelastdecade,studieshaveestablishedtheprobabilityof aresponsetoIFNtreatmentaccordingtothekineticsoftheHCV RNA level during therapy. For example, patients who did not achieveanEVRdidnotachieveSVRin97%and100%ofcases,21,22

whichconferredahighnegativepredictivevaluetothepresenceof HCV RNAat week 12. Theresultsfrom thesestudiesfavor the discontinuationoftreatmentinpatientswhodonotachieveEVRat week12oftreatment.

Inregardsofhemodialysispatients,Gordonetal.31showedthat

patientswithlowerratesofbridgingfibrosisorcirrhosis,lower serumbaselineHCVRNAlevels,andinfectionswithgenotype non-1tendedtoachievehigherSVRrates,althoughthesefindingsdid not reach statistical significance. However, that study included onlybaselinevariablesanddidnotallowfortheinterruptionof treatment in patients with a lower likelihood of response. Therefore, theidentificationof HCV RNAduring treatment is a highlyattractivetoolfortheearlyidentificationofpatientswitha lowerprobabilityof response.Furthermore, thiswould indicate whentherapyshouldbeinterruptedinthispopulationinwhich thetolerancetotreatmentissignificantlylower.

Studieson thekineticsofHCV RNAasa predictorof SVRin dialysispatientsarescarceandhaveinvolvedsmallnumbersof patients. Inaddition,many studiesarenotcomparable because theyhaveevaluateddifferenttreatmentregimensandHCVRNAat different periods. Furthermore, these studies have included patientswithdosereductionsand/orearlytreatmentinterruption, whichcanimpairtheanalysisoftherelationshipbetween viral kinetics and SVR. Liu et al.42 reported treatment failure in all

patients who did not achieve a rapid virological response (undetectable HCV RNAat week 4 oftreatment). In that study thepatientsreceivedconventionalorpegylatedIFNmonotherapy for 24 weeks.In anotherstudy that evaluated37 hemodialysis patients,26 conventional IFN monotherapy for 48 weeks was

ineffectiveatinducingSVRinpatients whohaddetectableHCV RNAinthesecondmonthoftreatment.Finally,astudyofonly12 patientsshowedthattheSVRratewasinfluencedbytheclearance of virus within the first 2 months of treatment.43 Although

insufficient to draw definitive conclusions, all these studies suggestthat HCVRNAkineticshavea highpredictivevaluefor SVR.Arecentmeta-analysisbyGordonetal.44supportsthesedata,

asanassociationbetweenSVRandviralnegativityanytimeinthe first3monthsoftreatmentwasdemonstrated.

ThepresentstudyevaluatedthepredictivevalueofHCVRNAat week12ofconventionalIFNtreatmentin40dialysispatients.This groupofpatientswascarefullyselectedfrom113dialysispatients treatedforhepatitisCandincludedonlypatientstreatedfor48 weekswithoutdosereduction.Therefore,this studycontributes data towardsthis unresolved issue.As weobserved anNPV of 100%,thesedatashowthatthelackofcEVRisastrongindicatorfor thefailureofIFNtherapyindialysispatients.

Allpatientsreceived48weeksoftreatmentirrespectiveofHCV genotyping.Therelationship between HCVgenotypeand treat-mentresponse inthis specialpopulation hasnotyetbeenwell established. In 2008 the Kidney Disease Improving Global

Figure1.Sustainedvirologicalresponse(SVR)ratesaccordingtoHCVRNAatweek 12ofantiviraltreatmentwithinterferon(IFN).

(4)

Outcomes (KDIGO) working group published guidelines with recommendations for the length of therapy based on HCV genotype (48 weeks for genotypes 1 and 4, and 24 weeks for genotypes2and3)thatweremadebyextrapolatingdatafromthe generalpopulation;45howevertheserecommendationswerenot

basedonrandomizedclinicaltrials.Inthiscontextitisalsovery importanttoevaluatethepredictivevalueofHCVRNAduringvery earlyweeksoftreatmentforpatientswithHCVreceivingantiviral therapyfor24weeksonly.

Theresultsofthisstudyaremeaningfulduetothelargenumber of co-morbidities and the high rate of potentially severe side effects of IFN treatment in this group of patients. Furthermore determiningstoppingrulesforhemodialysispatientsisextremely importantforkidneytransplantcandidatesbecause transplanta-tionisdelayedduringIFNtreatment.Inconclusion,interruptionof treatment should be indicated for hemodialysis patients with chronichepatitisConconventionalIFNmonotherapywhodonot achieveacEVR,duetothelowprobabilityofaresponseafter48 weeks.

Conflictofinterest:Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictofinterest.

References

1.JadoulM,CornuC,vanYperseledeStrihouC.Universalprecautionsprevent hepatitisCvirustransmission:a54monthfollow-upoftheBelgianMulticenter Study.TheUniversitairesCliniquesSt-Luc(UCL)CollaborativeGroup.KidneyInt 1998;53:1022–5.

2.JadoulM,PoignetJL,GeddesC,LocatelliF,MedinC,KrajewskaM,etal.The changingepidemiologyofhepatitisCvirus(HCV)infectioninhaemodialysis: Europeanmulticentrestudy.NephrolDialTransplant2004;19:904–9. 3.FinelliL,MillerJT,TokarsJI,AlterMJ,ArduinoMJ.Nationalsurveillanceof

dialysis-associateddiseasesintheUnitedStates,2002.SeminDial2005;18:52–61. 4.HuraibS,al-RashedR,AldreesA,AljefryM,ArifM,al-FalehFA.Highprevalence

ofandriskfactorsforhepatitisCinhaemodialysispatientsinSaudiArabia:a needfornewdialysisstrategies.NephrolDialTransplant1995;10:470–4. 5.SessoRC,LopesAA,ThomeFS,LugonJR,SantosDR.2010reportoftheBrazilian

DialysisCensus.JBrasNefrol2011;33:442–7.

6.SociedadeBrasileiradeNefrologia.CensoBrasileirodedia´lise.BrazilianSociety ofNephrology;1999.Availableat:http://www.nefrologiaonline.com.br/Censo/ censo99.asp(accessedAugust2012).

7.NakayamaE,AkibaT,MarumoF,SatoC.Prognosisofanti-hepatitisCvirus antibody-positivepatientsonregularhemodialysistherapy.JAmSocNephrol 2000;11:1896–902.

8.Kalantar-ZadehK,McAllisterCJ,MillerLG.Clinicalcharacteristicsandmortality in hepatitis C-positive haemodialysis patients:a population based study. NephrolDialTransplant2005;20:1662–9.

9.MaisonneuveP,AgodoaL,GellertR,StewartJH,BucciantiG,LowenfelsAB,etal. Cancerinpatientsondialysisforend-stagerenaldisease:aninternational collaborativestudy.Lancet1999;354:93–9.

10.CruzadoJM,CarreraM,TorrasJ,GrinyoJM,HepatitisC.virusinfectionandde novoglomerularlesionsinrenalallografts.AmJTransplant2001;1:171–8. 11.MahmoudIM,ElhabashiAF,ElsawyE,El-HusseiniAA,ShehaGE,SobhMA.The

impactofhepatitisCvirusviremiaonrenalgraftandpatientsurvival:a9-year prospectivestudy.AmJKidneyDis2004;43:131–9.

12.MathurinP,MouquetC,PoynardT,SyllaC,BenaliaH,FretzC,etal.Impactof hepatitisBandCvirusonkidneytransplantationoutcome.Hepatology1999;29: 257–63.

13.HanafusaT,IchikawaY,KishikawaH,KyoM,FukunishiT,KokadoY,etal. RetrospectivestudyontheimpactofhepatitisCvirusinfectiononkidney transplantpatientsover20years.Transplantation1998;66:471–6.

14.ZylberbergH,NalpasB,CarnotF,SkhiriH,FontaineH,LegendreC,etal.Severe evolutionofchronichepatitisCinrenaltransplantation:acasecontrolstudy. NephrolDialTransplant2002;17:129–33.

15.RostaingL,ModestoA,BaronE,CisterneJM,ChabannierMH,DurandD.Acute renalfailureinkidneytransplantpatientstreatedwithinterferonalpha2bfor chronichepatitisC.NephronClinPract1996;74:512–6.

16.TokumotoT,TanabeK,IshikawaN,SimizuT,OshimaT,NoguchiS,etal.Effectof interferon-alfatreatmentinrenaltransplantrecipientswithchronichepatitis C.TransplantProc1998;30:3270–2.

17.HanafusaT,IchikawaY,YazawaK,KishikawaH,FukunishiT,KanaiT,etal. HepatitisCvirusinfectioninkidneytransplantationandapilotstudyofthe effectsofinterferon-alphatherapy.TransplantProc1998;30:122–4. 18.GhanyMG,StraderDB,ThomasDL,SeeffLB. Diagnosis,management,and

treatmentofhepatitisC:anupdate.Hepatology2009;49:1335–74. 19.FabriziF, Dixit V, MessaP,Martin P. Interferonmonotherapy ofchronic

hepatitisCindialysispatients:meta-analysisofclinicaltrials.JViralHepat 2008;15:79–88.

20.RochaCM,PerezRM,FerreiraAP,Carvalho-FilhoRJ,PaceFH,SilvaIS,etal. Efficacyandtoleranceofinterferon-alphainthetreatmentofchronichepatitis Cin end-stagerenal disease patientsonhemodialysis. Liver Int2006;26: 305–10.

21.DavisGL,WongJB,McHutchisonJG,MannsMP,HarveyJ,AlbrechtJ.Early virologicresponsetotreatmentwithpeginterferonalfa-2bplusribavirinin patientswithchronichepatitisC.Hepatology2003;38:645–52.

22.FriedMW,ShiffmanML,ReddyKR,SmithC,MarinosG,GoncalesJrFL,etal. Peginterferonalfa-2aplusribavirinforchronichepatitisCvirusinfection.N EnglJMed2002;347:975–82.

23.PerezRM,FerrazML,FigueiredoMS,ContadoD,KoideS,FerreiraAP,etal. UnexpecteddistributionofhepatitisCvirusgenotypesinpatientson hemodi-alysisandkidneytransplantrecipients.JMedVirol2003;69:489–94. 24.BedossaP,PoynardT.Analgorithmforthegradingofactivity inchronic

hepatitis C. The METAVIRCooperative Study Group. Hepatology1996;24: 289–93.

25.NationalInstitutesofHealthConsensusDevelopmentConferencePanel State-ment:ManagementofhepatitisC.Hepatology1997;26(Suppl1):2S–10S. 26.DegosF,PolS,ChaixML,LaffitteV,BuffetC,BernardPH,etal.Thetoleranceand

efficacyofinterferon-alphainhaemodialysispatientswithHCVinfection:a multicentre,prospectivestudy.NephrolDialTransplant2001;16:1017–23. 27.UchiharaM,IzumiN,SakaiY,YauchiT,MiyakeS,SakaiT,etal.Interferon

therapyforchronichepatitisCinhemodialysispatients:increasedserumlevels ofinterferon.NephronClinPract1998;80:51–6.

28.Rostaing L, ChatelutE,Payen JL, IzopetJ, ThalamasC, Ton-ThatH,etal. PharmacokineticsofalphaIFN-2binchronichepatitisCviruspatients under-goingchronichemodialysisorwithnormalrenalfunction:clinicalimplications. JAmSocNephrol1998;9:2344–8.

29.RussoMW,GoldsweigCD,JacobsonIM,BrownJrRS.Interferonmonotherapy fordialysispatientswithchronichepatitisC:ananalysisoftheliteratureon efficacyandsafety.AmJGastroenterol2003;98:1610–5.

30.FabriziF,DulaiG,DixitV,BunnapradistS,MartinP.Meta-analysis:interferon forthetreatmentofchronichepatitisCindialysispatients.AlimentPharmacol Ther2003;18:1071–81.

31.GordonCE,UhligK,LauJ,SchmidCH,LeveyAS,WongJB.Interferontreatment inhemodialysispatientswithchronichepatitisCvirusinfection:asystematic reviewoftheliteratureandmeta-analysisoftreatmentefficacyandharms.AmJ KidneyDis2008;51:263–77.

32.AlavianSM,TabatabaeiSV.Meta-analysisoffactorsassociatedwithsustained viralresponseinpatientsonhemodialysistreatedwithstandardorpegylated interferonforhepatitisCinfection.IranJKidneyDis2010;4:181–94. 33.FabriziF,DixitV,MessaP,MartinP.Pegylatedinterferonmonotherapyof

chronichepatitisCindialysispatients:meta-analysisofclinicaltrials.JMed Virol2010;82:768–75.

34.HeathcoteEJ.Antiviraltherapy:chronichepatitisC.JViralHepat2007;14(Suppl 1):82–8.

35.MannsMP,McHutchisonJG,GordonSC,RustgiVK,ShiffmanM,ReindollarR, etal.Peginterferonalfa-2bplusribavirincomparedwithinterferonalfa-2bplus ribavirinforinitialtreatmentofchronichepatitisC:arandomisedtrial.Lancet 2001;358:958–65.

36.MuirAJ,BornsteinJD,KillenbergPG.Peginterferonalfa-2bandribavirinforthe treatmentofchronichepatitisCinblacksandnon-Hispanicwhites.NEnglJMed 2004;350:2265–71.

37.ConjeevaramHS,FriedMW,JeffersLJ,TerraultNA,Wiley-LucasTE,AfdhalN, etal.PeginterferonandribavirintreatmentinAfricanAmericanandCaucasian AmericanpatientswithhepatitisCgenotype1.Gastroenterology2006;131: 470–7.

38.Romero-Gomez M,Del MarViloria M,AndradeRJ, Salmeron J, Diago M, Fernandez-RodriguezCM,etal.Insulinresistanceimpairssustainedresponse ratetopeginterferonplusribavirininchronichepatitisCpatients. Gastroenter-ology2005;128:636–41.

39.PoustchiH,NegroF,HuiJ,CuaIH,BrandtLR,KenchJG,etal.Insulinresistance andresponsetotherapyinpatientsinfectedwithchronichepatitisCvirus genotypes2and3.JHepatol2008;48:28–34.

40.ReddyKR,ShiffmanML,MorganTR,ZeuzemS,HadziyannisS,HamzehFM,etal. ImpactofribavirindosereductionsinhepatitisCvirusgenotype1patients completingpeginterferonalfa-2a/ribavirintreatment.ClinGastroenterol Hepa-tol2007;5:124–9.

41.DusheikoG,NelsonD,ReddyKR.Ribavirinconsiderationsintreatment opti-mization.AntivirTher2008;13(Suppl1):23–30.

42.LiuCH,LiangCC,LinJW,ChenSI,TsaiHB,ChangCS,etal.Pegylatedinterferon alpha-2a versus standard interferon alpha-2a fortreatment-naivedialysis patientswithchronichepatitisC:arandomisedstudy.Gut2008;57:525–30. 43.HanrotelC, ToupanceO,LavaudS,ThiefinG,BrodardV,IngrandD,etal.

Virological and histological responses to one yearalpha-interferon-2a in hemodialyzedpatientswithchronichepatitisC.NephronClinPract2001;88: 120–6.

44. GordonCE,UhligK,LauJ,SchmidCH,LeveyAS,WongJB.Interferonfor hepatitisCvirusinhemodialysis—anindividualpatientmeta-analysisof factorsassociatedwithsustainedvirologicalresponse.ClinJAmSocNephrol 2009;4:1449–58.

45.KidneyDiseaseImprovingGlobalOutcomes.KDIGOclinicalpracticeguidelines fortheprevention,diagnosis,evaluation,andtreatmentofhepatitisCinchronic kidneydisease.KidneyInt2008;73:S1–99.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

O índice de vulnerabilidade socioambiental à desertificação (IVSD) foi desenvolvido em um sistema de informações geográficas utilizando dados ambientais e socioeconômicos, tais

Conclusion - In the evaluated patients the presence of liver steatosis did not inluence the sustained virological response of patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the IL28B gene polymorphism (rs12979860) and other variables could predict the outcome of antiviral thera- py in a cohort

A reduced response to interferon therapy has been described in individuals with chronic hepatitis C and serological markers of a resolved HBV infection (HBsAg

Background and aim: The durability of the sustained virologic response (SVR) in patients with chronic hepatitis C after treatment and the ideal follow-up time for these

Analysis of variable values associated to results of fibrosis (Improved and Not improved) in paired biopsies, taken before and after chronic hepatitis C treatment in

Since the first attempts at treatment of HCV infection in HIV-positive patients, a small percentage of patients presenting a sustained virological response at the end of the

Conclusion: The results of the present study demonstrate that, in patients with chronic hepatitis C, ultrasonography has limitations in the characterization of