• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Features of microelement maintenance in rat's brain tissues at experimental hypoxia of different degree.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "Features of microelement maintenance in rat's brain tissues at experimental hypoxia of different degree."

Copied!
7
0
0

Texto

(1)

__________________________________________________________________________________ • 2011 • V • №2

84

. .

:

-, ,

, -.

Наді шла: 18.05.2011

Пр нята: 20.06.2011

[616.831:612.233:577.128]:616-092.9

Ч

Щ

Ь

. ( , , ,

, ),

-.

( , ,

, , ).

-є 1,5-10 . є 2,5 . є , , є 1,2 .

, - , – 27,65 %, – 25,84%, –

16,43%,

-. є

-, є .

. – 2011. – . V, № 2. – . 84-90.

© . . , 2011.

Tarasova I.V. Features of microelement maintenance in rat's brain tissues at experimental hypoxia of different de-gree.

Summary. Features of microelement maintenance (iron, zinc, copper, manganese, and cobalt), conditionally toxic chrome and toxic lead were studied in newborn rat's brain tissues at experimental hypoxia of different degree. Tissues of newborn rat’s brain are characterized by high level of saturation and considerable dynamism of microelement maintenance. Till the end of the first week of life, the maintenance of these microelements decreases in 1,5 – 10 times. The level of the toxic lead decreases more than in 2,5 times. The hypoxia of easy degree of newborn rats invokes reduction cobalt level 3 times, iron level 2 times, manganese – on 27,65 %, chrome – on 25,84%,zinc – on 16,43%. It means that considerable deficiency and disbalance of microelement maintenance rat's brain tissues. The heavy degree of hypoxia is characterized by further increase of deficiency and disbalance of microelements.

Key words: hypoxia, microelements, newborn rats, brain.

є

-, є

,

( . ., 2007; . .,

2005; . . ., 2006).

є

, , ,

-є 60 - 86% ( . .

., 2006; .І., 2007).

-, ,

-, ,

-,

,

( Є.Є., 2005; Volpe J.J., 2001). ,

( )

.

,

-є .

.

-.

( , ,

, , ),

.

60

(2)

__________________________________________________________________________________ • 2011 • V • №2

85

-.

«Є

,

-» ( , 1986), «

»,

( , 2001),

(2000).

,

І

. . .

( . ., 1987).

1012

2

,

525 . .,

є 110

. .

.

10-12

2

380 . .,

є 80 .

.

12

(30 ).

(30 )

.

0,001 ,

450 ,

(Sunderman F.W. et al., 2001).

(2 )

( . ., 2007)

’є 10

(Butala S.J., 2006).

115- 1

.

( )

(Zareba S. et al., 2005).

-.

.

/ .

-S-SPECTR.

STATISTICA 7.0 MS Excel

XP.

( . .

., 2003; . ., 2004).

є ’

-,

-.

(

-)

( . . .,

2000).

– 571,5±1,15 / .

-є ,

( . 1).

58,33±1,09 / .

, ,

-є (r=-0,28 – )

(r=0,12 – r=-0,07 –

). ,

-’є ,

.

є

-, .

– 261,66±8,64 / .

є 36,64% ( ≤0,05) –

165,67±1,23 / . 1

– 50,00±0,65

/ – 47,67±0,81 / .

-’є

.

,

є

є

(r=0,54)

(r=0,49) –

(r=-0,84).

-'

(r=-0,58).

, .

(3)

__________________________________________________________________________________ • 2011 • V • №2

86

є

-.

,

є 58,33%.

є

є 21,67%

19,45%.

.

1

( / )

Fe Cu Zn Cr Co Mn Pb

-571,5±1,15 6,26±0,11 158,5±0,7 76,40±0,91 2,76± 0,23 5,68±0,73 1,17± 0,21

7- 58,33±1,05 3,43±0,04 109,1±0,9 13,96±0,27 3,26±0,31 4,03±0,11 0,44± 0,09

,

є

( . 1). ,

-6,26±0,11 / .

є

3,43±0,04 / .

. ,

2-3 , –

5 .

-’

. є

(r=-0,35). ,

-є .

є

(r=-0,21).

. ,

33,97% ( ≤0,05).

є

. ,

є 6,71% ( ≥0,05).

є

-. є

-є – 37,19% ( ≤0,05).

-’

-. -.

,

є

(59,57%), є

є

(25,7%)

(8%).

є 158,54±0,66 / .

є 109,07±0,92 / ( . 1).

(r=-0,23),

(r=0,37) (r=0,21).

-є ’

, , , є

-.

– 16,43%

( ≤0,05). 1

,

-. ,

є

16,43% ( ≤0,05).

є

.

-.

-,

є –

43,71% ( ≤0,05),

– 3,89% % ( ≤0,05).

є ’

(r=-0,62) (r=-0,41).

є

(r=0,54).

(4)

-__________________________________________________________________________________ • 2011 • V • №2

87

є

,

-.

,

є (12,1%)

.

є 69,8%. ,

є

– 17,4%, є

-.

є

,

-.

є

76,40±0,91 / . 7

-є 13,96±0,27 / ( . 1 ).

, ,

є ,

-, є

.

(r=0,37), (r=-0,21)

(r=-0,38). ,

є

.

-є ’

, .

– , ,

(r=-0,77).

,

, є

.

25,84% ( ≤0,05).

-є .

є – 41,13% ( ≤0,05).

-.

7 є

-.

26,51% ( ≤0,05).

-.

,

, є

23,30% ( ≤0,05).

,

. ,

є ’

.

,

.

-, є

. ,

є 76,8%.

,

12,5%.

, ,

є,

-. ,

є 2,76±0,23 / .

, ,

-є . 1

є (3,26±0,31 / ),

( . 1).

є

(r=0,28). ,

’ .

– є 3 .

є

73,54% ( ≤0,05).

-,

є 43,55% ( ≤0,05).

7 є

– 46,02% ( ≤0,05).

є

(r=0,77)

– (r=0,46).

-,

(5)

-__________________________________________________________________________________ • 2011 • V • №2

88

.

-є ,

є

– 58,1%,

.

-, є

23,6%.

є

– 16,2%.

є є

-. ,

-є 5,68±0,73 /

4,03±0,11 / – 1 ( . 1).

-.

-,

.

-. ,

27,65% ( ≤0,05). 1

є

– 6,70% ( ≤0,05).

.

– 35,54% ( ≤0,05), 7

– 14,37% ( ≤0,05).

-’ .

,

є

-,

46,1%. є

29,6%.

є

( 21.8%).

є

1,17±0,21 /

0,44±0,09 / – ( . 1).

-’

.

є .

є

12,82% ( ≤0,05.

– 16,66% ( ≤0,05).

є

15,91% ( ≤0,05).

– 47,72% ( ≤0,05).

є

– .

’ ,

1 . ,

є

.

-. ,

. є

.

є

, ’ є

(r=-0,21).

.

-,

-, є .

-. , є

-

0,12. ’

– 0,39 0,68.

. ,

є -.

,

є

(68,3%),

-є 19,7%,

є .

1.

( , , , ,

-).

є 1,5- 10 .

(6)

__________________________________________________________________________________ • 2011 • V • №2

89

є 1,2 .

-,

.

є .

2.

-є є

.

, -

, - 27,65 %, -

25,84%, - 16,43%,

є

.

-, є

.

3.

-,

, , ,

-, є

, є

-,

.

є

(59,57%) (58,1%),

25,7% 23,6%.

4. , є

.

28,2% ( <0,05).

є

-, є

.

є ’

.

є

-, .

,

.

є

-,

-,

-.

. .

STATISTICA

: . / . . . – . :

. . , 2004. – 76 .

. .

/

. . , . . , . .

// . – 2006. − № 1

(10). − . 148-151.

. .

--

Exel. / . . , . . , . . . − . : , 2000. − 320 .

. .

(

-) : . .

-. . : . 14.01.10 “ ” / . . . −

, 2005. − 36 .

. .

: .

/ . . , . . , . . . –

. : , 2003. – 350 . . .

/ . . -. – -. : , 1987. – 200 .

. І.

-

/ . І.

// . − 2007. − № 3

(16). − . 172-174.

Є. Є.

:

.- . . “

-”, ( , 15−16 2005 . ) / Є. Є. , 2005. − . 2-10.

. .

/ . .

// . − 2007. −

№ 2. − . 33-35.

Butala S. J. Atomic absorption spectrophoto-metry methodology for the quantitative analysis of mercury in fish and hair / S. J. Butala, L. P. Scanlan, S. N. Chaudhuri // J. Food Prot. – 2006. – Vol. 69,

№ 11. – P. 2720-2728.

(7)

spectrophoto-__________________________________________________________________________________ • 2011 • V • №2

90

metry of nickel in tissue homogenates / F. W. Sunderman, A. Marzouk, M. C. Crisostomo [et al.] // Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science. – 2001.

− Vol. 15, № 4. – P. 299-307.

Volpe J. J. Neurology of the newborn / J. J. Volpe. − [4th ed.]. – Philadelphia : W. B. Saunders,

2001. – 912 p.

Zareba S. Determination of Fe (II) and Zn (II) by spectrophotometry, atomic absorption spectro-photometry and ions chromatography methods in Vitrum / S. Zareba, K. Szarwilo, A. Pomykalski // Farmaco. – 2005. – Vol. 60, № 5. – . 459-464.

. .

.

. ( , , ,

, )

-.

( , , , , ).

1,5- 10 .

2,5 . ,

1,2 .

, – , - 27,65 %, - 25,84%, - 16,43%,

.

.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The net zinc, iron, manganese, copper, and cobalt requirements of Moxotó goat kids grazing in the semiarid region increases as feed intake level and their body weight

A ocorrência de sintomas de ansiedade entre os entrevistados foi 50%, sendo que entre estes 52,7% são do sexo feminino, sendo que esta grande frequência de sintomas relatados

The study is based on the determination and correlation of the concentrations of manganese, chromium, zinc, nickel, copper and iron in sediments and tissues (skin, muscles

Thus, the current study aimed to determine the excretion level of trace mineral (copper, iron, manganese, and zinc), associated in its organic form, added to broiler diets at

zinc and vitamin E) supplementation on myosins expression levels in brain. tissues of streptozotocin?induced diabetes experimental rat

suite minimization approach that not only reduces test suite execution cost (time, normally) while maximizing fault detection ability (code coverage, usually), but also optimizes

A indústria de cosméticos, sediada no Estado de São Paulo, deverá buscar novos métodos alternativos para testes de segurança de HPPC, mas a resposta para isso nem sequer foi