ContentslistsavailableatSciVerseScienceDirect
Neuroscience
Letters
j o ur na l ho me p a g e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / n e u l e t
Commissural
NTS
lesions
enhance
the
pressor
response
to
central
cholinergic
and
adrenergic
activation
Alexandre
A.
Vieira,
Laurival
A.
De
Luca
Jr,
Eduardo
Colombari,
Debora
S.A.
Colombari,
José
V.
Menani
∗ DepartmentofPhysiologyandPathology,DentistrySchool,SãoPauloStateUniversity(UNESP),Araraquara,SP,Brazilh
i
g
h
l
i
g
h
t
s
◮LesionsofthecommNTSenhancethepressorresponsestoi.c.v.injectionofcarbachol.
◮commNTSinhibitorymechanismsareinvolvedinthemodulationofthepressorresponses.
◮commNTSlesionsimpairsympatheticactivationproducedbyperipheralchemoreceptor.
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory: Received10March2012
Receivedinrevisedform3May2012 Accepted15May2012
Keywords: Sympathetic Vasopressin Hypertension CommissuralNTS Bloodpressure
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Electrolyticlesionsofthecommissuralnucleusofthesolitarytract(commNTS)inratsenhancethe
pressorresponsetobilateralcarotidocclusionortointravenousinfusionofhypertonicNaClwithout
changingbaroreflexresponses.Inanoppositedirection,commNTSlesionsabolishthepressorresponses
toperipheralchemoreflex activation.Theseopposite effectsof commNTSlesionsapparentlyresult
fromanimpairmentofsympatheticactivationinonecaseandinafacilitationofvasopressin
secre-tionintheothers.Inthepresentstudy,weinvestigatedtheeffectsoftheelectrolyticlesionsofthe
commNTSinthepressorresponsesthatdependonsympatheticactivationandvasopressinsecretion
producedbycentralcholinergicoradrenergicactivationwithintracerebroventricular(i.c.v.)injections
ofcarbacholornoradrenaline,respectively,inunanesthetizedrats.Male Holtzmanrats(280–320g,
n=8–15/group)withacute(1day)orchronic(21days)shamorcommNTSlesions(1mA×10s)and
astainlesssteelcannulaimplantedinthelateralventriclewereused.AcutecommNTSlesionsincreased
thepressorresponsetoi.c.v.injectionofcarbachol(0.5nmol/11)(52±2,vs.sham:37±2mmHg)or
noradrenaline(80nmol/1l)(45±6,vs.sham:30±3mmHg),whereaschroniccommNTSlesionsdid
notaffectthepressorresponsestothesametreatments.LesionsofthecommNTSimpairedchemoreflex
responsesproducedbyintravenousKCN,withoutchangingbaroreflexresponses.Theresultssuggest
thatcommNTS-dependentinhibitorysignalsareinvolvedinthemodulationofthepressorresponsesto
centralcholinergicandadrenergicactivation,probablylimitingvasopressinsecretion.
© 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Signals from peripheralbaro and chemoreceptors reachthe nucleusofthesolitarytract(NTS)beforeascendingtoothercentral sitesthatcontroltheautonomicandhormonalresponsesinvolved inthecardiovascularregulation[24].
Inunanesthetizedrats,theelectrolyticlesionsofthemostcaudal portionoftheNTS,thecommissuralNTS(commNTS),reducethe pressorandbradycardicresponsesproducedbychemoreflex acti-vationwithintravenous(i.v.)injectionofpotassiumcyanide(KCN)
∗Correspondingauthorat:DepartamentodeFisiologiaePatologia,Faculdadede OdontologiadeAraraquara,UNESP,RuaHumaitá,1680,Araraquara,14801903,SP, Brazil.Tel.:+551633016486;fax:+551633016488.
E-mailaddress:menani@foar.unesp.br(J.V.Menani).
andthepressorresponsestol-glutamateinjectedintothelateral portionoftheintermediateNTS,withoutchangingtheresponsesto baroreflexactivation[13].AlthoughcommNTSlesionsdonotaffect baselinemeanarterialpressure(MAP)innormotensiverats,these lesionsreduceMAPtonormotensivelevels,foratleastfivedays, inspontaneouslyhypertensiverats(SHR)[23,30].Thereductionof baselineMAPinSHRorthepressorresponsestoi.v.KCNby comm-NTSlesionssuggeststhatthecommNTSispartofthehindbrain mechanismsinvolvedinsympatheticactivation.
On the other hand, commNTS lesions enhance the pressor
responsestobilateralcommoncarotid occlusionorto intragas-tric (i.g.)gavage of 2M NaCl [4,29], suggesting that commNTS
inhibitory mechanisms may oppose the action of the pressor
mechanisms activatedin theseconditions. The enhanced pres-sor responses to bilateral common carotid occlusion or to i.g. gavage of 2M NaCl was abolished in rats pre-treated with a
32 A.A.Vieiraetal./NeuroscienceLetters521 (2012) 31–36
vasopressin antagonist, suggesting that vasopressin secretion inducedbyhyperosmolarityor bycommoncarotidocclusion is inhibitedbycommNTSmechanisms[4,29].Therefore,studieshave suggestedthatcommNTSmayhaveoppositerolesinthecontrol ofsympatheticactivationandvasopressinrelease whichresults in opposite effects of the commNTS lesions on cardiovascular responsesdependingontheconditiontested[4,13,23,27,30].The reasonsforthesedifferencesoncardiovascularregulationarenot clearyet.
Exceptforthepressorresponsestoglutamateinjectionintothe intermediateNTS,alltheothercardiovascularresponsestestedin thecommNTS-lesionedratswereproduced bytheactivationof peripheralmechanismsoramixofcentralandperipheral mecha-nismsalmostexclusivelyintegratedinthehindbrain.Itwasnot tested yet the effects of the commNTS lesions in the pressor responsesproducedbytheactivationofforebrainmechanismsthat increasesympatheticactivityand/orvasopressinreleaselikethe pressorresponsestoforebraincholinergicoradrenergicactivation ([1,8,6,17,19,31]).Consideringthatpreviousstudieshave shown thatcommNTSlesionsmayaffectsympatheticactivationand vaso-pressinsecretioninoppositedirections,inthepresentstudy,we testedtheeffectsofthecommNTSlesionsinthepressorresponses producedbycentralcholinergicoradrenergicactivationwiththe injectionofcarbacholornoradrenaline,respectively,intothe lat-eralventricle(LV).
2. Materialsandmethods
2.1. Animals
MaleHoltzmanratsweighing280–320gwereused.The ani-malswerehousedindividuallyinstainlesssteelcagesinaroom withcontrolledtemperature(23±2◦C)andhumidity(55±10%). Lightswereonfrom7:00amto7:00pm.StandardPurinachow andtapwaterwereavailableadlibitum.TheEthicalCommittee for Animal Careand Use from Dentistry School of Araraquara-UNESPapprovedtheexperimentalprotocolsusedinthepresent study.
2.2. LesionofthecommNTS
Ratsanesthetizedwithhalothane werefixedtoastereotaxic frame(model900,DavidKopfInstruments).Thedorsalsurfaceof thebrainstemwasexposed.Atungstenwireelectrode(0.2mm ofdiameter)wasintroducedintothebrainstem0.0and0.5mm caudaltocalamusscriptorius, inmidlineand0.5mmbelowthe dorsalsurfaceofthebrain.Lesionswereperformedusingcathodal current(1mA×10sineachpointsoftheelectrodeintroduction).
2.3. ImplantofcannulasintotheLV
Rats were anesthetized with ketamine (80mg/kg of body
weight) combinedwith xylazine(7mg/kg of body weight) and placedinastereotaxicframe(model900,DavidKopfInstruments). A stainlesssteel 23-gauge cannula wasimplanted into the lat-eralcerebralventricle(LV)usingthecoordinates0.3mmcaudal tobregma,1.5mmlateraltomidlineand3.5mmbelowtodura mater.Thecannulaswerefixedtothecraniumusingdentalacrylic resinandjewelerscrews.Theratsreceivedaprophylacticdoseof penicillin(30,000IU)givenintramuscularlypost-surgically.
InratsusedtotesttheeffectsofacutecommNTSlesions,the stainlesssteelcannulawasimplantedintotheLV5daysbefore thelesionandinratsusedtotesttheeffectsofchroniccommNTS lesions,thecannulawasimplanted15daysafterthelesion.
2.4. Arterialpressureandheartraterecording
Meanarterialpressure(MAP)andheartrate(HR)wererecorded inunanesthetized rats.Onedaybeforerecording,theratswere anesthetizedwithketamine(80mg/kgofbodyweight)+xylazine (7mg/kg of body weight), a polyethylene tubing (PE-10 con-nectedtoaPE-50)wasinsertedintotheabdominalaortathrough thefemoralarteryfor arterialpressure recordingand a second polyethylenetubingwasinsertedintothefemoralveinfordrug administration.Arterialandvenouscathetersweretunneled sub-cutaneouslyandexposedonthebackoftherattoallowaccessin unrestrained,freelymovingrats.Torecordpulsatilearterial pres-sure,MAPandHR,thearterialcatheterwasconnectedtoaStathan Gould (P23 Db)pressure transducercoupledto a pre-amplifier (modelETH-200 BridgeBio Amplifier)that wasconnected toa Powerlabcomputerdataacquisitionsystem(modelPowerlab16SP, ADInstruments).
2.5. InjectionsintotheLV
InjectionsintotheLVwereperformedusingaHamiltonsyringe connectedtoaninjector needle(2mmlongerthanthecannula fixedtotheanimal’shead)byaPE-10polyethylenetubing.
2.6. Drugs
Carbachol(0.5nmol/1l)ornoradrenaline(80nmol/1l)was injectedintotheLV.Phenylephrine(5g/kgofbodyweight)and sodiumnitroprusside(30g/kgofbodyweight)wereinjectedi.v. fortestingbaroreflex.Potassiumcyanide(KCN,40g/0.1ml/rat) wasinjectedi.v. forchemoreflextest.Alldrugswerepurchased fromSigmaChem.Co.,St.Louis,MO,USA.Thedosesofcarbachol andnoradrenalinewereadaptedfromthepreviousstudiesthat testedtheeffectsofnoradrenalineandcarbacholinjectedintothe LVonarterialpressure[22,10].
2.7. Histology
Attheendoftheexperiments,ratsweredeeplyanesthetized with sodium thiopental (70mg/kg of body weight, ip). Saline
followed by 10% buffered formalin was perfused through the
heart. The brains were frozen, cut coronally (50m sections), stainedwithGiemsastainand analyzedbylight microscopyto confirmthesite of injectionintothe LV andthe lesionsinthe commNTS.
2.8. Statisticalanalysis
Theresultsarereportedasmeans±standarderrorsofmeans
(SEM).OnewayANOVAcombinedwithaStudentNewmanKeuls
testswereusedforcomparisons.Differenceswereconsidered sig-nificantatp<0.05.
2.9. Experimentalprotocol
Fig.1.(A–C)Schematicdiagramsand(D)photomicrographshowing(A)thelocalizationofthecommNTSwithinthemedullaoblongataand(B–D)thelesioncorrectlyplaced inthecommNTS(darkinBandCandindicatedbythearrowinD).AP,areapostrema;cc,centralcanal;XII,hypoglossalnucleus;Gr,gracilenucleus;py,pyramidaltract.
InothergroupsofratswithshamorcommNTSlesions(1and 21days)thesameprotocolwastested,exceptthatnoradrenaline (80nmol/1l)insteadofcarbacholwasinjectedintotheLV.
3. Results
3.1. Histologicalanalysis
Fig. 1 presents schematic diagrams and a photomicrograph showingthesiteofthelesioncorrectlyplaced inthecommNTS. ThecommNTSlesionswerelocatedinthemidline,abovethe cen-tralcanalandextendedfromtheleveloftheobextoaround1mm caudaltotheobex.LesionswererestrictedtothecommNTS,and
didnotinvolvethelateralportionsoftheNTS,hypoglossalnucleus ortheareapostrema,aspreviouslyshown[4,13,28,29].
3.2. Pressorresponsestoi.c.v.carbacholornoradrenalinein commNTS-lesionedrats
Acute(1day)commNTSlesionsenhancedthepressorresponses to i.c.v. injection of carbacol (0.5nmol/1l) (52±2mmHg, vs. sham rats: 37±2mmHg) [F(1, 29)=50.22; p<0.001] (Fig. 2A) or noradrenaline (80nmol/1l) (45±6mmHg, vs. sham rats: 30±3mmHg)[F(1,22)=10.23;p<0.05](Fig.2B).Chronic(21days) commNTSlesionsdidnot modifythepressor responsestoi.c.v. carbachol(43±4mmHg,vs.shamrats:39±4mmHg)(Fig.2A)or noradrenaline(34±4mmHg,vs.sham:32±4mmHg)(Fig.2B).
34 A.A.Vieiraetal./NeuroscienceLetters521 (2012) 31–36
Fig.3. IncreasesinMAPandreductionsinHRproducedbyi.v.injectionsofKCN(40g/0.1ml/rat)inshamorcommNTS-lesionedrats(1or21days)ofthegroupsofrats thatreceived(A)carbacholor(B)noradrenalinei.c.v.Theresultsarerepresentedbymeans±SEM.Thenumberofratsisindicatedinparenthesisaboveorbeloweachbar.
AcuteorchroniccommNTSlesionsdidnotaffectthechanges in HRproduced by i.c.v. injectionof carbachol (Fig.2C). Acute commNTS lesions reduced the bradycardia to i.c.v. injection of noradrenaline (−28±12bpm, vs. sham rats: −60±6bpm) [F(1,22)=10.13;p<0.05],whereaschroniccommNTSlesiondid not modify the bradycardia to i.c.v. injection of noradrenaline (−52±13bpm,vs.shamrats:−80±6bpm)(Fig.2D).
AcuteorchroniccommNTSlesionsdidnotaffectthebaseline MAP(104±3and 108±3mmHg,respectively) orHR (340±11 and356±13mmHg,respectively)comparedtothebaselineMAP (110±3and 116±1mmHg,respectively)and HR(387±15 and 386±17mmHg,respectively)ofshamrats.
3.3. BaroreflexandchemoreflexresponsesincommNTS-lesioned rats
Intheratstestedfortheeffectsofi.c.v.carbachol,acute(1day) commNTSlesionsreducedthepressor [F(1,23)=10.05;p<0.05] andbradycardicresponses[F(1,23)=19.66;p<0.001]toi.v. injec-tionofKCN(40g/0.1ml/rat),whereaschronic(21days)commNTS lesionsdidnotreducethepressor[F(1,17)=0.79;p>0.05]or brady-cardic[F(1, 17)=1.34; p>0.05] responses to i.v. KCN (Fig. 3A). Acuteor chronic commNTSlesions didnot modifythe pressor andbradycardicresponsetoi.v.injectionofphenylephrineorthe hypotension to i.v. infusion of sodium nitroprusside, however, acutecommNTSlesionsreducedthetachycardicresponsestoi.v. sodiumnitroprusside(60±6bpm,vs.shamrats:91±7bpm)[F(1, 23)=12.67;p<0.005].
Intheratstestedfortheeffectsofi.c.v.noradrenaline,acute[F(1, 22)=17.87;p<0.001]orchronic[F(1,15)=4.75;p<0.05] comm-NTSlesionsreducedthepressorresponsetoi.v.injectionofKCN (40g/0.1ml/rat)(Fig.3B).AcutecommNTSlesionsalsoreduced thebradycardicresponses[F(1,22)=10.07;p<0.05]producedby i.v.injectionofKCN(40g/0.1ml/rat).AcuteorchroniccommNTS lesionsdidnotmodifythepressorandbradycardicresponsesto i.v.injectionofphenylephrineorthedepressor andtachycardic responsestoi.v.sodiumnitroprusside.
4. Discussion
Thepresentresultsshowthatacute(1day)electrolyticlesions of the commNTSenhance the pressor responses toi.c.v. injec-tion of carbachol or noradrenaline, suggesting that commNTS inhibitorymechanismsareinvolvedinthemodulationofthe pres-sorresponsestocentralcholinergicoradrenergicactivation.The bradycardiatoi.c.v. injectionofcarbachol wasnotmodified by thecommNTSlesions,however,thebradycardiatoi.c.v.injection ofnoradrenalinewasreducedincommNTS-lesionedrats,which may also facilitate the pressor responses. The same commNTS lesionsthatfacilitatedthepressorresponsestoi.c.v.carbacholor noradrenalinereducedthepressorandbradycardicresponsesto peripheralchemoreflexactivationwithi.v.KCNanddidnotaffect thechangesinHRproducedbybaroreflexactivation.Theseresults suggestthattheinhibitorymechanismsdeactivatedbycommNTS lesionsarenotthesameinvolvedinthebaroreflexmodulationof autonomic responsesinvolved incardiovascular regulation.The facilitationof the pressor responsesto i.c.v. injectionof carba-cholornoradrenalinebycommNTSlesionsissimilartotheresults ofpreviousstudiesthatshowedenhanced pressorresponsesto bilateralcommoncarotidocclusionortoi.g.gavageof2MNaCl incommNTS-lesioned rats[4,29].Therefore, thepresent results extend the conclusion of the previous studies suggesting that thecommNTSinhibitorymechanismsalsomodulatethepressor responsestoforebraincholinergicoradrenergicactivation.
Differently from acute commNTS lesions, chronic (21 days) commNTS lesionsdid not affect the pressor responses to i.c.v. carbacholornoradrenaline,resultssimilartothoseofthe previ-ousstudy[28]thatshowednodifferenceinthepressorresponse produced by bilateral carotid occlusion in chronic commNTS-lesionedrats.Therecoveryoftheinhibitoryfunctioninchronic commNTS-lesionedratsisprobablyrelatedtotheneural plastic-ity,amechanismthatallowsareasnotdamagedbythelesion,like remainingportionsoftheNTS,toreplacethefunctionimpaired bythecommNTSlesions.Although theelectrolyticlesionsmay
also damage the fibers of passage, a previous study showed
dopamine-beta-hydroxylase-containingneuronsinthecommNTS aresimilar,suggestingthattheeffectsofthecommNTSlesionswere notduetothedestructionofthefibersofpassage[14].
LesionsofthecommNTSincreaseosmotic-inducedactivation of the paraventricular and supraoptic hypothalamic nuclei and plasmavasopressinlevels([5]andunpublishedresultsfromour laboratory).Theenhanced pressor responsetoani.g. gavageof 2MNaClortocommoncarotidocclusionincommNTS-lesioned ratswasabolishedbythepre-treatmentwithvasopressin antag-onist[4,29]. Therefore, the suggestion is that the commNTS is partofacentralcircuitrythatinhibitsvasopressinsecretion.The pressorresponsetoforebraincholinergicoradrenergicactivation aremediatedbyincreasesinsympatheticactivityandvasopressin release [1,8,6,17,19,31].Therefore, similartotheincreaseof i.g. 2MNaCl-orcarotidocclusion-inducedpressorresponses[4,29], theincreasedpressorresponsetocentralcholinergicoradrenergic activationincommNTS-lesionedratsmightbeduetoanincrease invasopressinsecretion.Althoughitisnotpossibletocompletely discardanincreasedsympatheticactivationtoi.c.v.carbacholor noradrenalineincommNTS-lesionedrats,theevidenceofprevious studies[13]suggestingthatcommNTSlesionsimpairsympathetic activationproducedbyperipheralchemoreceptoractivationorby glutamateinjectedintotheintermediateNTSsignalsinanopposite direction.
TheintermediateandcommNTSareanatomicallyconnectedto thelateralparabrachialnucleus(LPBN),theregionsurroundingthe anteroventralpartofthirdventricle(AV3Vregion),the paraventric-ular(PVN)andthesupraopticnuclei(SON)ofthehypothalamus [16,25,26,32]. These connections may convey signals from the peripheralcardiovascularreceptorsthatascendtoforebrainareas involved in the control of fluid-electrolytebalance and cardio-vascularregulation likethoseinvolved intheinhibitorycontrol ofvasopressinsecretion.Withoutexcludingotherreceptors, arte-rialbaroreceptorsarethemainsourceofinhibitorysignalsthat limitthepressorresponsesbyfacilitatingparasympatheticactivity andinhibitingsympatheticactivityandvasopressinsecretion.The commNTSreceivesmainlytheprimaryafferentprojectionsfrom theperipheralchemoreceptors,whereasmorerostralpartsofthe NTS,liketheintermediateNTSreceivesmainlytheprimaryafferent projectionsfromarterialbaroreceptors[24].AlthoughcommNTS isnotthemainsiteofthefirstsynapseofbaroreceptorafferents, itmightreceivebaroreceptorsignalsfromtheintermediateNTS, beforetheycouldreachforebrainareasinvolved in thecontrol ofvasopressinsecretion.However,differentlyfromthecontrolof vasopressinsecretion,theautonomiccontrolofthe cardiovascu-larsystembybaroreceptorsignalsseemstobeindependentfrom thecommNTS.ThismightexplainwhycommNTSlesionsstrongly affectthebaroreceptormodulationofvasopressinsecretionand onlyslightlyinfluenceautonomicresponsesmediatedby sympa-theticandparasympathetic mechanisms.On theotherhand,an increaseinvasopressinsecretiontocentralcholinergicor adrener-gicactivationbycommNTSlesionsissupportedbypreviousstudies thatproposedtheimportanceofchemoreceptorreflexinthe con-troloffluid-electrolytebalance[18].Theexpositionofmammals tolowoxygenpressure(moderatehigh-altitudehypoxia)results indiuresis,whichmightbeaconsequenceofreducedvasopressin secretionduetoaninhibitoryactionofperipheralchemoreceptor. ThelesionsofthecommNTSmayremovetheinhibitory mecha-nismsactivatedbyperipheralchemoreflexincreasingvasopressin secretionby stimuli like central cholinergicor adrenergic acti-vation.Therefore, thepresentand previousresultssuggest that the control of neural/autonomic and/or humoral responses to peripheralbaroreceptororchemoreceptoractivationmayinvolve
opposite mechanisms in the commNTS and the result can be
oppositecardiovascularresponsesdependingonwhichisthe pre-dominantmechanismactivated.
Acknowledgments
WethankSilasPereiraBarbosa,ReginaldodaConceic¸ãoQueiróz andSilviaFógliaforexperttechnicalassistance,SilvanaA.D. Mala-voltaforsecretarialassistance,andAnaV.deOliveiraforanimal care.ThisresearchwassupportedbypublicfundingfromFundac¸ão
de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) and
Conselho NacionaldeDesenvolvimento CientíficoeTecnológico (CNPq).
References
[1] F.H.Alves,C.C.Crestani,L.B.Resstel,F.M.Corrêa,Cardiovasculareffectsof noradrenalinemicroinjectedintotheinsularcortexofunanesthetizedrats, AutonomicNeuroscience160(1–2)(2011)90–98.
[4] G.T. Blanch, P.M. de Paula, J.V. Menani, E. Colombari, D.S.A. Colombari, Vasopressin-dependentpressorresponsesinducedbyhypertonicsalineload inratswithcommissuralNTSlesions,TheFASEBJournal21(2007)598.13 (abstract).
[5]G.T.Blanch,A.H.Freiria-Oliveira,E.Colombari,J.V.Menani,D.Murphy,D.S.A. Colombari,Lesionsofthecommissuralnucleusoftractussolitariiincrease osmotic-inducedactivationofparaventricularandsupraoptichypothalamic nuclei,in:ProceedingofthePhysiologicalSociety15,PC1,UniversityCollege Dublin,2009,85pp.(abstract).
[6]H.E.Brezenoff,Cardiovascularregulationbybrainacetylcholine,Federation Proceedings43(1984)17–20.
[8]H.E.Brezenoff,R.Giuliano,Cardiovascularcontrolbycholinergicmechanisms inthecentralnervoussystem,AnnualReviewofPharmacologyandToxicology 22(1982)341–381.
[10] D.S.Colombari,E.Colombari,W.A.Saad,L.A.Camargo,A.Renzi,L.A.DeLuca Jr.,J.V.Menani,Effectoffurosemidetreatmentonthecentraland periph-eralpressorresponses tocholinergicandadrenergicagonists,angiotensin II, hypertonicsolution and vasopressin, NeuroscienceLetters 143 (1992) 255–258.
[13] E.Colombari,J.V.Menani,W.T.Talman,CommissuralNTScontributestopressor responsestoglutamateinjectedintothemedialNTSofawakerats,American JournalofPhysiology270(1996)R1220–R1225.
[14] A.H. Freiria-Oliveira, G.T. Blanch, G.R. Pedrino, S.L.D. Cravo, E. Colom-bari,J.V. Menani,D.S.A. Colombari,Alpha2noradrenergicneurons inhibit osmoreceptor-inducedpressorresponses,TheFASEBJournal738.3(22)(2008) (abstract).
[16] H. Herbert, M.M. Moga, C.B. Saper, Connections of the parabrachial nucleus with the nucleus of the solitary tract and the medullary retic-ularformation inthe rat, Journalof ComparativeNeurology293 (1990) 540–580.
[17] W.E. Hoffman, M.I. Phillips, P.G. Schimid, J. Falcon, J.F. Weet, Antidi-uretichormone release and the pressorresponse to central angiotensin II and cholinergic stimulation, Neuropharmacology 16 (1977) 463–472.
[18] A.Honig,Peripheralarterialchemoreceptorsandreflexcontrolofsodium and water homeostasis, American Journal of Physiology 257 (1989) R282–R302.
[19]Y. Imai, K. Abe, N. Sasaki, N. Minami, M. Munakata, S. Yumita, T. Nobunaga,H.Sekino,K.Yoshinaga,Role ofvasopressinincardiovascular responsestocentralcholinergicstimulationinrats,Hypertension13(1989) 549–557.
[22]J.V.Menani,W.A.Saad,L.A.Camargo,A.Renzi,L.A.DeLucaJr.,E.Colombari,The anteroventralthirdventricle(AV3V)regionisessentialforpressor,dipsogenic andnatriureticresponsestocentralcarbachol,NeuroscienceLetters113(3) (1990)339–344.
[23]T.S.Moreira,A.C.Takakura,E.Colombari,J.V.Menani,Anti-hypertensiveeffects ofcentralablationsinspontaneouslyhypertensiverats,AmericanJournalof Physiology:Regulatory,IntegrativeandComparativePhysiology296(6)(2009) R1797–R1806.
[24]M.Palkovits,L.Zaborsky,Neuroanatomyofcentralcardiovascularcontrol. Nucleustractussolitarii:afferentandefferentneuronalconnectionsin rela-tiontothebaroreceptorreflexarch,ProgressinBrainResearch47(1974) 9–34.
[25]J.A.Ricardo,E.T.Koh,Anatomicalevidenceofdirectprojectionsfromthe nucleusofthesolitarytracttothehypothalamusamygdala,andotherforebrain structuresintherat,BrainResearch153(1978)1–26.
[26]C.B.Saper,D.J.Reis,T.Joh,Medullarycatecholamineinputstothe anteroven-tralthirdventricularcardiovascularregulatoryregionintherat,Neuroscience Letters42(1983)285–291.
[27]M.A.Sato,E.Colombari, S.F.Morrison, Inhibitionof neurons in commis-suralnucleus ofsolitary tractreducessympatheticnerveactivityinSHR, AmericanJournalofPhysiology:HeartandCirculatoryPhysiology282(2002) H1679–H1684.
36 A.A.Vieiraetal./NeuroscienceLetters521 (2012) 31–36
[29]M.A.Sato,J.V.Menani,O.U.Lopes,E.Colombari,Enhancedpressorresponse tocarotidocclusionincommNTS-lesionedrats:possibleefferentmechanisms, AmericanJournalofPhysiology278(2000)R1258–R1266.
[30]M.A.Sato,G.H.Schoorlemmer,J.V.Menani,O.U.Lopes,E.Colombari,Recovery ofhighbloodpressureafterchroniclesionsofthecommissuralNTSinSHR, Hypertension42(4)(2003)713–718.
[31]A.A.Scopinho,L.B.M. Resstel,J. Antunes-Rodrigues,F.M.A.Corrêa, Pressor effectsofnoradrenalineinjectedintothelateralseptalareaofunanesthetized rats,BrainResearch1122(2006)126–134.