.381
.382
(Abraham Flexner)
(Alexander Morris Carr-Saunders) (P.A.Wilson)
(M.S.
Larson)
1950
83 6 1-2
Howard S. Becker The Nature of a Profession, Education for the Professions:The Sixty-first Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education,ed. Nelson B. Henry(Chicago University of Chicago Press, 1962), pp.27-28.
, p.28
N. Elias, professions, A Dictionary of the Social Sciences, ed. Julius Gould (New York : the Free Press of Glencoe, 1969), p.542.
.383
Roma
Goode
1.
2.
3.
4.
Roma M. Harris, In Pursuit of Status, in Librarianship:Terosion of a Women s Profession(Nowood, NJ Ablex Publishing,1992), pp.5-6.
William J. Goode, Community within a Community :the Professions, American Socilolgical Review, 22 (February 1957): p.197.
37 74
12 138
.384
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
(Alexander Morris
Carr-Saunders) (Addison)
Alexander Morris Carr-saunders & P.A. Wilson, The Profession : Their Organization and Place in Society(Oxford The Claredon Press, 1928), p.viii
3 1
85 9 55-59
33 ( 86 7
.385
IFLA 1995
1887 (Melvil Dewey)
1931
1935
1999
79-91
Hans Prins, & Wilco de Gier, The Image of the Library and Information Profession, How We See Ourselves:in Investigation(Munchen: K. G. Saur, 1995 ), p.35
73 20
23
83 125
7 2 24 6 263-302
.386
1.
2.
3.
62 ( 88 6
) 77-86
689 69-70
.387
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
.388
90
52
SPSS
48
19 (39.6%)
29 (60.4%)
2 42 (87.5%)
6 (12.5%)
3 39 (81.3%)
9 (18.7%)
4 39 (81.3%)
27 (51.3%)
.390
5 40 (83.3%) 18 22
1
7
6 37 (77.1%)
35 (72.9%)
.391 35 (72.9%) 34 (70.8%) 32 (66.7%) 31 (64.6%) 31 (64.6%) 20 (41.7%)
8 36 (76.6%)
.392
9 39 (83%)
23 31 (66%)
29 (61.7%)
91
(ALA)
ALA
(ALA)
10 31 (64.6%) 16
17 (35.4%)
.393
11 39 (81.3%)
33 (68.8%)
28 (58.3%) 26 (54.2%)
12 25 (52.1%)
12
.394
13 38 (79.2%)
23
(47.9%)
4 (8.3%)
14
24 (50%)
13
15 41 (85.4%)
33 (68.8%)
15 (31.2%)
17 37 (77.1%)
26 (54.2%)
25 (52.1%)
18 48 (100%)
(19 ) (29 )
.396
19 39 (81.3%)
37 (77.1%) 29
(60.4%)
43 92.1% 24
5 (10.4%)
.397
22 20 (41.7%)
( )
(15 )
13 (27.1%)
5 (10.4%)
23 19 (39.6%)
13 (27.1%)
10 (20.8%)
(
.398
25 26
(54.2%) (19 )
22 (45.8%)
26 39 (81.2%) (24 )
( )
(15 )
9 (18.8%)
.399
27 34 (70.8%) (20 )
14 (29.2%)
1. 87.5%
81.3%
2. 81.3%
.401
13. 70.8%
1.
(1)
(2) :
( : )
( )
2.
3.
.402
ALA
Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 40:3 (March 2003):381-406
.406
Abstract
This study uses Librarianship as an example and attempts to recommend several prerequisites of professionalism after investigation of related papers. Through librarian s self-assessment in professionalism, this research examines librarian s recognition of conditions constituting to professionalism. From this analysis it can be concluded that the channels of present professionalism conditions for library such as formal educational programs, knowledge system for professionalism, professional organizations, professional qualifications, professional autonomy, legal protection, library service, common recognition and value perception, and on-job training have already achieved the standard of professionalism. It shows the content of professionalism can be viewed as attributes of professionalism.
The conditions that could not completely achieve professional standard such as profes-sional regulations, profesprofes-sional job and skill differentiation, employment channel, and professional types and attributes need further reinforcement. Finally, some recommen-dations such as reinforcing the functionality of Library association of Republic of China, demonstration of effectiveness of Library Law , career plan of librarian, and reinforcing training method of professionals are highlighted in the hope to seek the earlier recognition of professionalism in the field of librarianship.
Keywords : Library; Librarian; Professionalism; Professional prerequisite; Recognition of professionalism
Study on Self-assessment of Professionalism
-An Example of Current Librarianship
Li-Ling Tzeng Graduate Student Shih-Hsion Huang
Professor
