• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Content of teachers' stereotypes about adolescents

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "Content of teachers' stereotypes about adolescents"

Copied!
16
0
0

Texto

(1)

37.064.2:316.647.8;316.62-053.6 DOI: 10.2298/ZIPI0901131D

А АЈ И А А АВ И А А Ц И А

Ђ *

,

А . » o «

, , .

» «

.

ђ

. a 193

-.

ђ .

-: ( ) ђ

» -«; ( )

( ) ђ

. , » «

-.

ђ ,

.

К : , , , .

,

, »

(Schneider, 2005). ,

/

-, , »

-« » «

(Vranješević, 2001).

-a .

» «

(2)

ђ

. ,

-:

; ђ

;

-; ђ

; ,

(Aleksić i Pejović-Milovančević, 2005).

» « :

,

,

-,

-,

(Bandura, 1964).

.

-, , ђ ,

-ђ » «.

ђ ,

-, ,

,

(Arnett, 1999).

-. ђ ,

-,

(Karpov, 2005).

-» « ,

(Petersen, 1988),

ђ

(Buchanan, Eccles & Becker, 1992; Smetana, Campione-Barr & Metzger, 2006).

(3)

: ( )

» « ( )

-. (2001)

.

,

, , ,

.

(Stevenes et al., 2007)

,

: , -

-, .

.

, , ђ

-, .

-,

» «.

-,

ђ ,

. -

-,

-, , ,

.

,

ђ

-. ,

, /

, .

-ђ , .

» « ,

.

,

-.

-. ђ

» «,

(4)

»

-« ,

(Buchanan, Eccles & Becker, 1992; Laurson, Coy & Collins 1998; Arnett, 1999). (Bandura,

2006)

ђ e

.

-ђ .

» « ,

(Bandura,

1964, 2006; Petersen, 1988).

, ђ

ђ

(Vranješević, 2004).

»

«

-.

(Holmbeck & Hill, 1988; Buchanan et al., 1990; Buchanan & Holmbeck, 1998; Jacobs, Chin & Shaver, 2005;

Hin s & P ulson, 2006; Stevens et al., 2007)

-ђ ,

(Seginer & Somech, 2000).

ђ » «

.

, ,

(Stevens et al.,

2007),

-ђ .

, .

-ђ .

-, , ,

(5)

ђ

.

: ( )

ђ ,

;( )

» «

( )

.

.

2008. . 193

, 156 (81%) 37

(19%) ( ,

- / ).

(» «,

» «, » «, » «,

»Ђ ђ «, » - «, » Ћ «, »

-«, » «, » «, » «

» «).

, .

(Buchanan & Holmbeck, 1998)

(»Measuring beliefs

about adolescent personality and behavior«)

-.

,

-.

,

(»category-based beliefs«)

(»stress storm scale«),

( 58)

» « .

1, ђ

( , ,

, , , ђ

-, ).

ђ ђ 10

14 .

(

-,

(6)

ђ .

ђ ,

-.

-(Spearman-Brown-Kuder-Richardson-Guttman-Cron

-bach, ALFA) (Momirović,

donja granica pouzdanosti, BETA 6; Momirović-Knezević-Radović, MI1;

Lord-Kaiser-Caffrey, BETA). α

(

1).

.

1:

( )

ALFA

0.6166

0.591

0.6655

( ) 0.8966

0.8765

ђ .

, .

-ђ ,

-. »

(Buchanan et al., 1990) .

( 2).

(7)

« , ,

. »

ђ «,

. ,

(Buchanan et al., 1990) »

-«, ,

.

, ,

.

2:

»

«

»

«; »

«; » «;

» ђ «,

» «.

»

Ћ«

»

«; »

,

«;

» ,

«; » «.

»

«

» ђ

«;

» ђ ,

«;

» ,

«; » ђ

«; »

«; »

«.

,

, » « (

(8)

» « ,

,

,

.

-. ђ ,

,

.

,

.

(Steinberg & Silk, 2002)

(Bandura, 1964; Buchanan, Eccles & Becker, 1992).

-,

-, .

»

-« (Buchanan et al., 1990).

ђ ,

.

,

. ђ ,

.

, ,

-,

-,

.

, » «

. »

-«. ,

-. ,

(9)

-.

.

-,

» « ,

(Bandura 1964; Petersen &

Crockett, 1985; Petersen, 1988; Buchanan, Eccles & Becker, 1992; Laurson, Coy & Collins 1998; Arnett, 1999; Bandura 2006).

,

, ,

. ђ

, ,

ђ . ,

ђ . ђ ,

-,

-. ,

,

-.

. ,

(Vranješević, 2001).

, o

.

(Holmbeck &

Hill, 1988; Buchanan & Holmbeck, 1998).

: » « (

-), » «, »

-«, » «, » « » «.

( )

30%

.

(10)

« – :

-, , » « ; »

-« – ,

-, , , ,

; » « –

,

, , , , ;

» « – ,

, ђ .

»

-« .

, , ,

, , ,

, , ,

, ,

, , , ,

, .

(Holmbeck

& Hill, 1988; Buchanan et al., 1990; Buchanan & Holmbeck, 1998),

» « (Arnett, 1999)

» o «

. ђ ,

(Bandura, 1964, 2006; Petersen,

1988) ђ

(Petersen, 1988; Buchanan et al., 1990; Buchanan, Eccles & Becker, 1992; Arnett, 1999; Holmbeck & Hill, 1998; Laurson, Coy & Collins 1998;

Kar-pov, 2005; Bandura 2006). »

.

, , ,

-, , .

. (2002)

( , , ).

ђ

,

(11)

3: К ђ

( ) -0.01 0.45* 0.29*

0.41* -0.16 0.05

* 0.01.

. » « (

-) (p=0.45) »

«

» « (p=0.29),

» «

» « (p=0.41).

. ,

, ,

-, , , , ,

, , ,

, ђ

, .

,

. ,

» « .

-,

ђ ,

.

ђ

-, ,

,

-,

-ђ . » « (Steinberg & Silk,

2002)

(12)

(Ban-dura, 1964; Buchanan, Eccles & Becker, 1992). ,

,

.

,

ђ .

. ђ

,

,

( , , ,

, )

.

,

-.

,

.

ђ

ђ .

ђ ђ

-.

-, posthoc

-. ђ

ђ

-, »

«, » «, »

-« ђ 3.45 3.78.

» «

(AS=3.04; t=0.96; p>0.05) » « (AS=3.15; t=3.69;

p<0.01) ,

.

ђ »

-«, » « » « (Đerić, 2008).

» « .

»

-« ђ . ,

ђ

. ђ

(13)

» «

» «.

4: К ђ

» «

0.49 -0.18

ђ ,

ђ .

,

( 0.01) »

« » «

. , ,

, » «

-,

-, ,

, ,

,

,

» «

ђ .

-ђ ђ »

-.

-,

( , , , ,

)

.

-, .

» «.

(14)

( ,

-, , , ).

-.

-ђ (Buchanan et al., 1990; Hines &

Pa-ulson, 2006). ђ

-,

(Đerić, 2008).

, : ( )

; ( )

» «; ( ) » «

-,

( )

,

.

. »

«, 149001 (2006-2010),

.

К

Aleksić, O. i M. Pejović-Milovančević (2005): »Adolescencija: mitovi, stereotipi, realnost«; u V. Čurčić (ur.): Unutrašnja i spoljašn a realnost adolescenata (47-53). Beograd: IP »Žarko Albulj«.

Arnett, J.J. (1999): »Adolescent storm and stress reconsidered«, American Psychologist, Vol. 54, No. 5, 317-326.

Bandura, A. (1964): »The stormy decade: fact or fiction«, Psychology in School, Vol. 1, No. 3, 224-231.

Bandura, A. (2006): »Adolescent development from an agentic perspective«; in F. Pajares & T. Urdan (eds.): Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (1-43). Greenvich, CT: Age Pub-lishing.

Buchanan, C.M. et al. (1990): »Parents’ and teachers’ beliefs about adolescents: effects of sex and experience«, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Vol. 19, No. 4, 363-394.

Buchanan, C.M, J.C. Eccles & J.B. Becker (1992): »Are adolescents the victims of raging hormones: evidence for activational effects of hormones on moods and behavior at adolescence«, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 111, No. 1, 62-107.

Buchanan, C.M. & G.N. Holmbeck (1998): »Measuring beliefs about adolescent personality and behavior«, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Vol. 27, No. 6, 602-627.

(15)

Đerić, I. (2008): Uticaj stereotipnih predstava nastavnika o adolescentima na njihove odnose u nastavnom procesu (magistarski rad). Beograd: Filozofski fakultet.

Hines, A.R. & S.E. Paulson (2006): »Parents’ and teachers’ perceptions of adolescent storm and stress: relations with parenting and teaching styles«, Adolescence, Vol. 41, No. 164, 597-614.

Holmbeck, G.N. & J.P. Hill (1988): »Storm and stress beliefs about adolescence: prevalence, self-reported antecedents and effects of an undergraduate course«, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Vol. 17, No. 4, 285-306.

Jacobs, J.E., C.S. Chin & K. Shaver (2005): »Longitudinal links between perceptions of adolescence and the social beliefs of adolescents: are parents’ stereotypes related to beliefs held about and by their children«, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Vol. 34, No. 2, 61-72.

Karpov, Y.V. (2005): The neo-vygotskian approach to child development. New York: Cam-bridge University Press.

Laurson, B., K. Coy & W.A. Collins (1998): »Reconsidering changes in parent-child conflict across adolescence: a meta-analysis«, Child Development, Vol. 69, No. 3, 817-832. Petersen, A.C. & L. Crockett (1985): »Pubertal timing and grade effects on adjustment«,

Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Vol. 4, No. 3, 191-206.

Petersen, A.C. (1988): »Adolescent development«, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 39, 583-607.

Radoš, N. (2002): Osobine kojima nastavnici redovne i specijalne osnovne škole opisuju svo-je učenike (diplomski rad). Beograd: Odeljenje za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta. Schneider, J.D. (2005): The psychology of stereotyping. New York: Guilford Press.

Seginer, R. & A. Somech (2000): »In the eyes of the beholder: how adolescents, teachers and school counselors construct adolescent images«, Social Psychology of Education, Vol. 4, No. 2, 139-157.

Smet na, J.G., N. Campione-Barr & A. Metzger (2006): »Adolescent development in inter-personal and societal contexts«, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 57, 255-284. Stevenes, L.P. et al. (2007): »Reconceptualizing the possible narratives of adolescence«,

Australian Educational Researcher, Vol. 34, No. 2, 107-128.

Steinberg, L.S. & J.J. Silk (2002): »Parenting adolescents«; in M. Bornstein (ed.): Handbook of parenting (103-133). New Jersey: »Lawrence Erlbaum«.

Vranješević, J. (2001): Promena slike o sebi: autoportret adolescencije. Beograd: Zadužbina Andrejević.

Vranješević, J. (2004): »Participacija i razvoj u adolescenciji«, Pedagogija,Br. 1, 60-67.

02.03.2009; 16.04.2009.

Ivana Djeric

CONTENT OF TEACHERS’ STEREOTYPES ABOUT ADOLESCENTS Abstract

(16)

teach-ing the seventh grade in ten Belgrade primary schools. Factor analysis method estab-lished the presence of several factors, which reflect the psychological content and meaning of teachers’ stereotypes about younger adolescents. The results of our rese-arch point out: (a) that stereotypes of teachers about younger adolescents stand in partial correspondence with the content of a widely distributed concept of “storm and stress”; (b) that this concept is mostly loaded with a negative perception of pupils on the part of teachers and (c) that teachers less often perceive pupils through the prism of some positive qualities. That is, teachers think that these positive qualities are not “typical” qualities of adolescents if they are observed as a group. Interviewed teach-ers hold stereotypes about younger adolescents, but intensity and valence of stereo-types vary depending on the nature of obtained factors.

Key words: stereotypes, teachers, adolescents, primary school.

ю

« o »

, , .

« »,

.

:

,

-. 193 ,

.

,

. : ( )

« », ( )

( )

. , ,

« » ,

.

, ,

.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Teaching in the first stage of primary education is a context factor that affects teachers’ adhesion to grade retention: it is the teachers in the initial years of basic

The iterative methods: Jacobi, Gauss-Seidel and SOR methods were incorporated into the acceleration scheme (Chebyshev extrapolation, Residual smoothing, Accelerated

social assistance. The protection of jobs within some enterprises, cooperatives, forms of economical associations, constitute an efficient social policy, totally different from

Abstract: As in ancient architecture of Greece and Rome there was an interconnection between picturesque and monumental forms of arts, in antique period in the architecture

The probability of attending school four our group of interest in this region increased by 6.5 percentage points after the expansion of the Bolsa Família program in 2007 and

A tradição anglo-saxônica analisa os dois tipos de construção como sendo do mesmo tipo, as chamadas it-clefts, independentemente de haver um elemento do tipo “that”

Surprisingly, one of them is the definition of Fractional Differintegration (FD). In fact, there are several definitions that lead to different results