• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Self-archiving of Our Own Articles: Romeo and Juliet Notes

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "Self-archiving of Our Own Articles: Romeo and Juliet Notes"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texto

(1)

)218(

COPYRIGHT 2015 © BY THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY

Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2015; 3(4):218-219. http://abjs.mums.ac.ir

the online version of this article abjs.mums.ac.ir

Amir Reza Kachooei, MD

Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

F

ree access to the articles is becoming more popular since it gives thousands of researchers access to millions of publications resulting in higher visibility and receiving much more citations, which often times might be the ultimate goal. For this reason, authors may seek a way to make the papers easily accessible to other researchers via uploading the full text to their personal website and/or scientific social networks such as the ResearchGate, which is legally considered a personal website of the users (1). This looks simple and naï�ve, but on the other hand it seems to be in contrast to the policy of the subscription-based journals, which may violate the granted signed copyright to the publisher (2).

There are two concerns with letting others access the article for free:

1) A friend or a colleague may request the paper and the author is going to send the article via email.

2) The author uploads the full text on to a personal or scientific website available to every researcher.

Regarding the first issue, do not hesitate to do so. It is accepted ethically and legally to send a requested paper to a researcher who is asking for it. As far as there is no commercial advantage by having the paper, any scientific use is encouraged and permitted.

The second concern is currently a hot topic. On the bright side, providing free access to every paper might endanger the monetary benefits of the publishers. However, on the flip side of the coin, publishers are also gaining greater income, although indirect but significant via receiving more visibility and subsequent citations to the exposed papers. Having said that, to create a balance

between the appeals for free access while avoiding the breach to the copyright system, publishers have come up with new policies in this regards, which is different from the Copyright without violating the subscription-based journals.

The publisher copyright policies for self-archiving is called SHERPA/RoMEO. Within this, the copyright agreement policies and the retained author rights are obviated. SHERPA established in the UK universities as the SHERPA project to support open access institutional repositories, which further grew and is now comprised of fairly all research institutions as the partners. SHERPA is involved in full or advisory partner of some projects including the SHERPA/RoMEO (3).

Self-archiving permissions vary between publishers and journals. Details about publisher and journal can be found on http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/ (4). For most of the journals and publishers, Resaerchgate pages are linked to the correct publisher condition and can be seen by clicking ‘show self-archiving restrictions’. Permission is classified using colors: green means you can generally upload a full-text, blue or yellow means you should check your individual article conditions, and white means self-archiving is generally not permitted.

It is the author’s responsibility to check for the RoMEO color and make sure he/she is not breaching the copyright conditions. However, do not forget that in case you are not permitted to post the full text to public, you are always allowed to send the article in a private message to another researcher or colleague.

Corresponding Author: Amir Reza Kachooei, Massachusetts

General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA. Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Email: [email protected]

EDITORIAL

Self-archiving of Our Own Articles:

Romeo and Juliet Notes

RoMEO color Self-Archiving policy

Green color Can archive pre-print or post-print or publisher’s verion/PDF Blue color Can archive post-print or publishers version/PDF

(2)

Self-archiving of our own articles: RoMEO and JULIET notes THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY. ABJS.MUMS.AC.IR

VOLUME 3. NUMBER 4. OCTOBER 2015

)219(

References

1. This project makes full-text articles available to the public, for free – the first application of its kind worldwide. Self-Archiving Repository goes online. Available at: URL: https://www.researchgate.net/ blog/post/self-archiving-repository-goes-online; 2009.

2. Sadeghi R. Self archiving of the scientific publications:Legal and ethical issues. Self-Archiving. Available at: URL: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/

self-archiving-scientific-publicationslegal-ethical-issues-sadeghi; 2015.

3. Sherpa/RoMeo. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Available at: URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ SHERPA/RoMEO.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The red color indicates higher density, which means that these words have greater weight or importance; followed by orange, yellow, green and..

Art.  522.  A  empresa  deve  estabelecer  um  sistema  de  gerenciamento  de  mudanças  com  o  objetivo  de  manter  sob  controle  as  alterações  que 

Condições de lavagem simples e anti-sepsia das mãos Lavatório exclusivo para lavagem das mãos Torneira acionada sem o comando das mãos Dispensador com sabão líquido. Suporte

Os resultados do presente trabalho permitem concluir que a substituição da proteína do farelo de soja pela proteína da parte aérea da mandioca em até 6% (10,8% de inclusão)

Participaram do julgamento os Conselheiros Luis Antônio da Silva Costa, Carlos Andrade Silveira e Domingos

evaluated the efficacy of rehabilitation with removable partial dentures including 182 mandibular prostheses (137 Kennedy Class I and 24 Kennedy Class II) [10]. Among 292

Different selection index can be used in plant breeding, which are generally constructed from estimates of genetic parameters or phenotypic means obtained using analysis of

O algoritmo FCM convergiu com 26 iterac¸˜oes, o tempo m´edio de cada iterac¸˜ao foram de 0,09 segundos e o tempo total at´e a convergˆencia foram de 2,46 segundos, sendo o