• Nenhum resultado encontrado

SECONDARY INFECTIONS IN SWINE FLU

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "SECONDARY INFECTIONS IN SWINE FLU "

Copied!
3
0
0

Texto

(1)

BRIEF COMUNICATION

Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences/ Volume 2/ Issue 18/ May 6, 2013 Page-3130

SECONDARY INFECTIONS IN SWINE FLU

Duthade.Mangala .M, Damle.Ajit.S, Bhakare.Jayshree.B, Bajaj.Jyoti.K

1. Assistant Professor,. Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College & Hospital, Aurangabad. 2. Professor and Head,. Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College & Hospital, Aurangabad. 3. Associate Professor,. Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College & Hospital, Aurangabad. 4. Associate Professor,. Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College & Hospital, Aurangabad.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:

Duthade.Mangala. M. House No: 1-9-75, Near Maitree Computers, Jaisingpura, Aurangabad (MS) Pin :- 431001.

E-mail: dr_umalkar@yahoo.co.in

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Swine influenza is respiratory disease of pigs caused

by type A influenza virus that causes regular outbreak in pigs. Human to human transmission occurs. Some people develop severe respiratory symptoms and need ventilator. Patients can get secondary bacterial infections in the form of pneumonia if viral infections persist. Death of swine flu occurs due to secondary bacterial infections leading to bacterial pneumonias. METHOD: 369 patients having acute respiratory illness suspected to be suffering from swine flu were included. Real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed on sputum samples or tracheal aspirates of 134 patients admitted in Hospital due to pneumonia. 90 of these patients were positive for swine flu by RT-PCR. RESULT: Among 90 patients 55 patients showed bacterial growth and 35 patients did not show any growth. Maximum patients 17 shows Klebsiella pneumoniae, 17 show Staphylococcus aureus, 10 show Escherichia coli, 8 show Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 3 patients show Streptococcus pneumoniae. Even after treatment, death of 36 patients occurred. Among these 36 patients, 19 had both, bacterial as well as swine flu infection and 17 patients had only swine flu infection. CONCLUSION: Secondary bacterial infections in swine flu patients were multi resistant to antibiotics were noted. Pneumonia caused by co-infection contributes to a severe rapidly progressive illness.

INTRODUCTION: Swine influenza is a respiratory disease of pigs caused by type A influenza virus.

Humans are infected by close contact with pigs; human to human transmission occurs through coughing and sneezing [1]. Some people develop severe respiratory symptoms and need ventilator for life support. Patients can get secondary bacterial infections in the form of pneumonia if the viral infection persists [2].

(2)

BRIEF COMUNICATION

Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences/ Volume 2/ Issue 18/ May 6, 2013 Page-3131

avian strain of influenza viruses, the largest proportion of genes coming from swine influenza viruses [5].

On May 16, 2009 the first Indian case of pandemic H1N1 2009 influenza was reported in a traveler from United States in Hyderabad [6]. By October 2009 cases were reported from all parts of India. The first death from pandemic H1N1 infection in India was reported on August 3, 2009 from Pune, which was due to bacterial pneumonia.

Death of patients of swine flu occurs due to secondary bacterial infections leading to bacterial pneumonia (WHO). Secondary bacterial infections should therefore be treated by appropriate antibiotics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was carried out from April 2010 to April 2011 in the

Department of Microbiology. 369 patients having acute respiratory illness suspected to be suffering from swine flu were included. Post nasal swabs and throat swabs of these patients were collected in viral transport medium (VTM) and sent to National Institute of Virology, (NIV) Pune. Diagnosis of H1N1 influenza was confirmed at NIV with the use of real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay [7].

Of these patients clinically showing signs/symptoms of pneumonia were admitted in

hospital and out of these 21 patients had to be put on ventilators. Sputum samples or tracheal aspirates of these 134 patients were sent to Microbiology laboratory for secondary bacterial infections.

OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS: Out of 369 patients suspected to be suffering from swine flu, 134

were admitted due to pneumonia. Out of these 134 patients, 64 were males and 70 were females. Majority of patients were in the age group of 22 to 30 years. 90 of these patients were positive for swine flu by RT-PCR. Among these 90 patients 55 patients showed bacterial growth in their respiratory tract samples submitted for culture. Majority of these patients (17) showed growth of Klebsiella pneumoniae. An equal number (17) showed Staphylococcus aureus. Ten other patients showed Escherichia coli, while 8 patients showed Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 3 patients showed Streptococcus pneumoniae. 35 patients did not have any bacterial growth in their respiratory secretions. Oseltamivir was administered to the confirmed cases and their close contacts, simultaneously patients with bacterial growth were treated with suitable antibiotics depending on susceptibility test.

Even after treatment, death of 36 patients occurred. Among these 36 patients, 19 had both, bacterial as well as swine flu infection and 17 patients had only swine flu infection.

DISCUSSION: Unlike seasonal influenza strains having impact on elderly people, swine flu H1N1

(3)

BRIEF COMUNICATION

Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences/ Volume 2/ Issue 18/ May 6, 2013 Page-3132

In our study 90 patients having pneumonia were positive for swine flu. Among these 90 patients 55 had secondary bacterial pneumonia as proved by positivity of their respiratory tract cultures. 35 other patients showed no bacteria in their respiratory secretions. This means these were patients of viral pneumonias. Pneumonia is known to be caused by swine flu virus. Pneumonia may be viral, secondary bacterial or both combined [9]

Even though patients having secondary bacterial infections were treated with suitable antibiotics, 19 of these succumbed. This indicates that probably the viral component of their pneumonia was dominant; the death was due to viral pneumonia. Seventeen of the persons without bacteria in sputum also succumbed. Thus most of the deaths in our study were due to viral pneumonia. Pneumonia caused by co-infection contributes to a severe rapidly progressive illness. Early diagnosis of patients will ensure early administration of antiviral drugs. Treatment of bacterial infection should be done immediately in order to prevent mortality.

Swine flu virus can maintain itself in environment. So in favorable conditions it will again cause epidemics, leading to more mortality.

REFERENCES:

1. LindstromS, Balish A et al. Antigenic and genetic characteristic of swine –origin 2009 A (H1N1) influenza viruses circulating in humans.Science2009; 325:197-201.

2. Rothberg MB; Haessler SD."Complications of seasonal and pandemic influenza". Critical care medicine38 (4 Suppl): e91–7. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c92eeb. PMID 19935413. 3. Taubenberger JK, Morems DM,"1918Influenza: the mother of all pandemic". Emergence

infect dis.2006; Available from URL-www. CDC. govt.

4. ChanyLY, ShihSR, Shao PL, Haung DT, Haung LM. Novel swine flu-origin influenza virus A (H1N1): the first pandemic of the 21st century. J formos Med Assoc 2009:108:526-532.

5. Trifonov, Vladimir; Khiabanian, Hossein; Rabadan, Raul (9July2009)."Geographic Dependence, Surveillance, and Origins of the 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Virus". New England Journal of Medicine 61(2):115119.doi:10.1056/NEJMp0904572.PMID 19474418. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/NEJMp0904572. Retrieved 14 May 2010.

6. Ministry of health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Influenza A (H1N1).Press Release of 16th May 2009.Available at: http:/mohfw.nic.in/swineachive.htm.

7. Clinical management of human infection with new influenza A (H1N1) virus: initial guidance: World Health Organisation: Global alert and response. 21 may 2009. Available from:http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publication/swineflu/clinicalmanagement/en/in dex.html.Accessed on 15.Febuary. 2010

8. Web SA, Pettilδ V, Seppelt I, Bellomo R , Bailey M, Cooper DJ, etal .services and 2009 H1N1 influenza in Australia and New Zealand .N E 2009;361:1925-34.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

produção convencional (PC) em produção orgânica (PO), sendo o manejo integrado de pragas (MIP) o “coração” do sistema de produção integrada, ou seja, a base técnica para a

In non milking goats other common causes of arthritis can be confused with infection by M agalactiae , including other Mycoplasma and bacterial infections, virus infections

To help fill this gap, we investigated the influence of bacterial infections of the respiratory tract and of amoxicillin therapy on intestinal populations of the bacterial genera

After antivenom therapy, 34 patients (28.1%) had secondary infection and among them, 24 (70.6%) patients needed surgical intervention (including wound incision, pus drainage,

Doutor: Olhay como vindes baxo que cuidando que acertais dais no vosso mesmo escudo: que direis a quantos barões illustres ouve em Roma, letrados por excelencia, por

Secondary bacterial infections such as sinusitis, acute otitis media (AOM) and even pneumonia can occur after common cold episodes, but most cases of common colds follow

Materials and Methods: We performed a prospective descriptive study of the Mediterranean spotted fever cases admitted to the paediatrics emergency department of a of a group

Segundo a “Diabetes Education for Primary Healthcare Professionals”, os pacientes não aderem à terapêutica 50% das vezes e, em algumas doenças que são assintomáticas