• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Bras. Reumatol. vol.55 número1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Bras. Reumatol. vol.55 número1"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texto

(1)

REVISTA

BRASILEIRA

DE

REUMATOLOGIA

www . r e u m a t o l o g i a . c o m . b r

Original

article

Evaluation

of

performance

of

BASDAI

(Bath

Ankylosing

Spondylitis

Disease

Activity

Index)

in

a

Brazilian

cohort

of

1492

patients

with

spondyloarthritis:

data

from

the

Brazilian

Registry

of

Spondyloarthritides

(RBE)

Izaias

Pereira

da

Costa

a,∗

,

Adriana

B.

Bortoluzzo

b

,

Célio

R.

Gonc¸alves

c

,

José

Antonio

Braga

da

Silva

d

,

Antonio

Carlos

Ximenes

e

,

Manoel

B.

Bértolo

f

,

Sandra

L.E.

Ribeiro

g

,

Mauro

Keiserman

h

,

Rita

Menin

i

,

Thelma

L.

Skare

j

,

Sueli

Carneiro

k

,

Valderílio

F.

Azevedo

l

,

Walber

P.

Vieira

m

,

Elisa

N.

Albuquerque

n

,

Washington

A.

Bianchi

o

,

Rubens

Bonfiglioli

p

,

Cristiano

Campanholo

q

,

Hellen

M.S.

Carvalho

r

,

Angela

L.B.

Pinto

Duarte

s

,

Charles

L.

Kohem

t

,

Nocy

H.

Leite

u

,

Sonia

A.L.

Lima

v

,

Eduardo

S.

Meirelles

w

,

Ivânio

A.

Pereira

x

,

Marcelo

M.

Pinheiro

y

,

Elizandra

Polito

z

,

Gustavo

G.

Resende

aa

,

Francisco

Airton

C.

Rocha

bb

,

Mittermayer

B.

Santiago

cc

,

Maria

de

Fátima

L.C.

Sauma

dd

,

Valéria

Valim

ee

,

Percival

D.

Sampaio-Barros

c

aUniversidadeFederaldoMatoGrossodoSul,CampoGrande,MS,Brazil

bInstitutoInsperdeEducac¸ãoePesquisa,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil

cRheumatologyDiscipline,UniversidadedeSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil

dUniversidadedeBrasília,Brasília,DF,Brazil

eHospitalGeraldeGoiânia,Goiânia,GO,Brazil

fUniversidadedeCampinas,Campinas,SP,Brazil

gUniversidadeFederaldoAmazonas,Manaus,AM,Brazil

hPontifíciaUniversidadeCatólica,PortoAlegre,RS,Brazil

iFaculdadedeMedicinadeSãoJosédoRioPreto,SãoJosédoRioPreto,SP,Brazil

jHospitalEvangélicodeCuritiba,Curitiba,PR,Brazil

kUniversidadeFederaldoRiodeJaneiro,RiodeJaneiro,RJ,Brazil

lUniversidadeFederaldoParaná,Curitiba,PR,Brazil

mHospitalGeraldeFortaleza,Fortaleza,CE,Brazil

nUniversidadeEstadualdoRiodeJaneiro,RiodeJaneiro,RJ,Brazil

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:izapec@hotmail.com(I.P.d.Costa). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbre.2014.05.005

(2)

oSantaCasadoRiodeJaneiro,RiodeJaneiro,RJ,Brazil

pPontifíciaUniversidadeCatólica,Campinas,SP,Brazil

qSantaCasadeSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil

rHospitaldeBase,Brasília,DF,Brazil

sUniversidadeFederaldePernambuco,Recife,PE,Brazil

tUniversidadeFederaldoRioGrandedoSul,PortoAlegre,RS,Brazil

uFaculdadedeMedicinaSouzaMarques,RiodeJaneiro,RJ,Brazil

vHospitaldoServidorPúblicoEstadual,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil

wInstituteofOrthopedyandTraumatology,UniversidadedeSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil

xUniversidadeFederaldeSantaCatarina,Florianópolis,SC,Brazil

yUniversidadeFederaldeSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil

zSantaCasadeBeloHorizonte,BeloHorizonte,MG,Brazil

aaUniversidadeFederaldeMinasGerais,BeloHorizonte,MG,Brazil

bbUniversidadeFederaldoCeará,Fortaleza,CE,Brazil

ccEscoladeMedicinaeSaúdePública,Salvador,BA,Brazil

ddUniversidadeFederaldoPará,Belém,PA,Brazil

eeUniversidadeFederaldoEspíritoSanto,Vitória,ES,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received13February2013 Accepted19May2014

Availableonline20December2014

Keywords:

Spondyloarthritis Diseaseactivity BASDAI Epidemiology

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Objective:ToanalyzetheresultsoftheapplicationoftheBathAnkylosingSpondylitis

Dis-easeActivityIndex(BASDAI)inalargeseriesofBrazilianpatientswiththediagnosisofSpA andestablishitscorrelationswithspecificvariablesintothegroup.

Methods:Acommonprotocolofinvestigationwasprospectivelyappliedto1492Brazilian

patientsclassifiedasSpAaccordingtotheEuropeanSpondyoarthropathiesStudyGroup (ESSG),attendedat29referralcentersofRheumatologyinBrazil.Clinicalanddemographic variables,anddiseaseindices(BASDAI,Basfi,Basri,Mases,ASQol)wereapplied.Thetotal valuesofBASDAIwerecomparedtothepresenceofthedifferentvariables.

Results:ThemeanscoreofBASDAIwas4.20±2.38.ThemeanscoresofBASDAIwerehigher

inpatientswiththecombined(axial+peripheral+entheseal)(4.54±2.38)clinical presen-tation, compared to the pure axial(3.78±2.27) or pure peripheral (4.00±2.38) clinical presentations(P<0.001).BASDAIalsopresentedhigherscoresassociatedwiththefemale gender(P<0.001)andpatientswhodidnotpracticeexercises(P<0.001).Regardingtheaxial component,highervaluesofBASDAIweresignificantlyassociatedwithinflammatorylow back pain(P<0.049),alternatingbuttockpain(P<0.001),cervicalpain(P<0.001)andhip involvement(P<0.001).TherewasalsostatisticalassociationbetweenBASDAIscoresand theperipheralinvolvement,relatedtothelower(P=0.004)andupperlimbs(P=0.025).The presenceofenthesitiswasalsoassociatedtohigherscoresofBASDAI(P=0.040).Positive HLA-B27andthepresenceofcutaneouspsoriasis,inflammatoryboweldisease,uveitisand urethritiswerenotcorrelatedwiththemeanscoresofBASDAI.LowerscoresofBASDAIwere associatedwiththeuseofbiologicagents(P<0.001).

Conclusion: In thisheterogeneous Brazilian seriesof SpA patients, BASDAIwas ableto

demonstrate“diseaseactivity”inpatientswithaxialaswellasperipheraldisease. ©2014ElsevierEditoraLtda.Allrightsreserved.

Avaliac¸ão

do

desempenho

do

BASDAI

(Bath

Ankylosing

Spondylitis

Disease

Activity

Index)

numa

coorte

brasileira

de

1.492

pacientes

com

espondiloartrites:

dados

do

Registro

Brasileiro

de

Espondiloartrites

(RBE)

Palavras-chave:

Espondiloartrites Atividadededoenc¸a

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Objetivo:Avaliarosresultadosdaaplicac¸ãodoÍndicedeAtividadedeDoenc¸adaEspondilite

(3)

BASDAI Epidemiologia

Métodos: Umprotocolocomumdeinvestigac¸ãofoiprospectivamenteaplicadoem1.492

pacientesbrasileirosclassificadoscomoEpApeloscritériosdoGrupoEuropeudeEstudodas Espondiloartropatias(ESSG),acompanhadosem29centrosdereferênciaemreumatologia noBrasil.Variáveisclínicas,demográficaseíndicesdedoenc¸aforamcolhidos.Osvalores totaisdoBASDAIforamcomparadoscomapresenc¸adasdiferentesvariáveis.

Resultados: OvalormédiodoBASDAIfoide4,20±2,38.OsescoresmédiosdoBASDAIforam

maiselevadosnospacientescomformaclínicacombinada,comparadoàsformasaxiais eperiféricasisoladas,nospacientesdosexofemininoenossedentários.Comrelac¸ãoao componenteaxial,valoresmaisaltosdoBASDAIestiveramsignificativamenteassociados àlombalgiainflamatória,àdoralternanteemnádegas,àdorcervicaleaoacometimento decoxofemorais.Houveassociac¸ãoestatísticaentreosvaloresdoBASDAIeo comprome-timentoperiférico,relacionadoaonúmerodearticulac¸õesinflamadas,tantodosmembros inferioresquantodosmembrossuperiores,eàsentesites.ApositividadedoHLA-B27ea presenc¸ademanifestac¸õesextra-articularesnãoestiveramcorrelacionadascomosvalores médiosdoBASDAI.ValoresmaisbaixosdoBASDAIestiveramassociadosaousodeagentes biológicos(p<0,001).

Conclusão: NestasérieheterogêneadepacientesbrasileiroscomEpA,oBASDAIconseguiu

demonstrar“atividadededoenc¸a”tantonospacientescomacometimentoaxialquanto naquelescomenvolvimentoperiférico.

©2014ElsevierEditoraLtda.Todososdireitosreservados.

Introduction

Thedenominationspondyloarthritis(SpA)definesa hetero-geneous group of diseases that share genetic and clinical characteristics,aswellasstructuralchangesinimaging stud-ies.ThepositivityofHLA-B27andtheabsenceofrheumatoid factorare common tothis groupofdiseases,and thehigh frequencyofinflammatoryprocessesofthespine,sacroiliac jointsandenthesisisconsideredthemainclinicalcriteriafor thediagnosisofSpA.1Otherclinicalmanifestationsoccurin

varyingdegrees ofinvolvementin thegroup ofSpA; more often, skin, ocular, intestinal and urogenital injuries and, less frequently, pulmonary, cardiac, renal and neurological involvement.1

Thisgroupofdiseasesconsistsofankylosingspondylitis (AS),psoriatic arthritis (PA),reactive arthritis(ReA), arthri-tisassociatedwithinflammatoryboweldiseases(alsoknown asenterophaticarthritis–EA)andundifferentiated spondy-loarthritis(USpA).1

With the advent of new therapeutic modalities for the groupofSpA,theelaborationofmeasuresofdisease activ-itythatcouldbeusedinlong-termfollow-upwasnecessary.2

Currently,toevaluateandmonitorclinicaldiseaseactivityin SpA,theBathAnkylosingSpondylitisDiseaseActivityIndex (BASDAI)hasbeenused.Thisindexisobtainedbysumming thevaluesofavisualanalog scale(VAS) thatevaluatessix items,namely:fatigue,axialpain, peripheralpain, enthesi-tis,durationandintensityofmorningstiffness.3BASDAIdoes

notuseany markerofinflammatoryactivity inits calcula-tion,sincethesetestswerenotstandardizedatthetimeof itsproposition.3BASDAIvaluesareinternationallyused

(BAS-DAI≥4isdeemedas“highdiseaseactivity”)fortheindication ofbiologicalagentsinthetreatmentofSpA,whentherewas noresponsetoconventionaltreatmentwithnonsteroidal anti-inflammatorydrugsorwithconventionalremissivedrugs.4,5

When the patient reaches BASDAI 50(improvement in the BASDAI scoreof ≥50%)in the first 12 weeksof treatment, thiscanbeconsideredasaverygoodclinicalresponse.6Due

toitsimportance,BASDAIhasbeentranslatedandvalidated inseverallanguages,includingFrench,7Swedish,8German,9

Spanish,10Turkish,11Arabic12andPortuguese.13Recently,the

Ankylosing SpondylitisDisease Activity Score(ASDAS) was created14;thisindexassociatesthepresenceofamarkerof

inflammatory activity,erythrocytesedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP); nowadays, ASDAS has its cut-offscorestodifferentiate“moderate”,“high”and“veryhigh” activity.15

ThispaperanalyzestheapplicationofBASDAIina hetero-geneousBraziliancohortof1492patientswithSpA.

Methods

This is a prospective, observational, multicenter study, conductedwith 1492patientsfrom 29 referral centers par-ticipating in the Brazilian Registry of Spondyloarthritides

(Registro Brasileiro de Espondiloartrites – RBE). All patients

fulfilled the criteria of the European Spondyloarthropathy StudyGroup(ESSG).16DatawerecollectedfromJune2006to

December 2009. RBE participates in the RESPONDIA group

(RegistroIberoamericanodeEspondiloartrites),consistingofnine

LatinAmericancountries(Argentina,Brazil,CostaRica,Chile, Ecuador,Mexico,Peru,UruguayandVenezuela)andthetwo countriesoftheIberianpeninsula(SpainandPortugal).

(4)

C-reactive protein – CRP), as well as the treatment (nons-teroidanti-inflammatorydrugs–NSAIDs,corticosteroidsand conventionalandbiologicalremissivedrugs).

ForthediagnosisofAS,theNewYorkcriteriawereused17;

forpsoriaticarthritis,theparticipantshadtomeetthe crite-riaofMollandWright.18 Thediagnosis ofreactive arthritis

wasconsideredifasymmetricoligoarthritisofthelowerlimbs were present,with enthesopathy and/or inflammatorylow backpainarousingafteranentericorurogenitalinfection,19

andspondyloarthritis/arthritisassociatedwithinflammatory boweldisease,ifthepatienthadaninflammatoryaxial dis-order and/or peripheraljoint involvement, associated with confirmedCrohn’sdiseaseorulcerativecolitis.

BASDAI is a tool for evaluation of disease activity that contains six questions.3 The responses were marked on a

horizontallinemeasuring10cm(from0to10cm),wherethe patientevaluateshowhefeelsinrelationtoeachiteminthe lastweek,markingonthescale:ifthepatientisfine(“very well”),he/shemarkszerocm,graduallyincreasinguntil“very poor”,correspondingtoa10-cmmark.Thesixquestions com-prisingBASDAIareasfollows:(1)Howwouldyoudescribethe degreeoffatigueortirednessyouhavehad?;(2)Howwould youdescribetheoveralllevelofneck,backandhippainrelated toyourillness?;(3)Howwouldyoudescribetheoveralllevel ofpainandedema(swelling)inotherjoints,apartfromneck, backandhip?;(4)Howwouldyoudescribetheoveralllevelof discomfortyoufelttothetouchorcompressioninthepainful regionsofyourbody?;(5)Howwouldyoudescribethe inten-sityofmorningstiffnessyouhavehad,fromthetimeyouwake up?;(6)Howlongdoesyourmorningstiffnesstake,fromthe timeyouwakeup?

Statisticalanalysis

Thevariable categories were comparedusing2 and Fisher’s

exacttests, andcontinuousvariables werecomparedusing ANOVA.Avalue ofP<0.05was considered significant;and 0.05>P>0.10wasconsideredasastatisticaltrend.

Results

ThemeanscoreoftotalBASDAIwas4.20±2.38.Amongthe sixitemsthatmakeupthefinalvalueofBASDAI,theitem2 (relatedtoaxialpain;5.05±3.20)hadthehighestmean,and theitem3(relatedtoperipheralcomponent;3.28±3.18)was thatwiththelowestvalue.ThemeanvaluesofBASDAItoall thequestionsthatmakeuptheindexaredescribedinTable1.

Table1–ResultsofBASDAIperitem.

BASDAI Mean Standard

deviation

Total 4.20 2.38

Question1 4.21 2.99

Question2 5.05 3.20

Question3 3.28 3.18

Question4 4.28 3.34

Question5 4.59 3.29

Question6 3.85 3.36

Table2–ResultsofBASDAIaccordingtospecificSpA.

% Mean SD P

PrimaryAS 67.6 4.21 2.36 PsoriaticAS 4.6 4.38 2.32 EnteropathicAS 2.6 4.70 2.41

PsoriaticArthritis 14.2 4.13 2.47 0.305

USpA 6.8 4.35 2.28

ReactiveArthritis 3.4 4.12 2.57 EnteropathicArthritis 0.8 4.37 3.05

Therewasnosignificantdifferencebetweenthemean val-uesofBASDAIandanyspecificdiseasewithintheSpAgroup. ThemeanvaluesofBASDAIforeachdiseasewithinthegroup are shown in Table 2. As to the clinical presentation, the meanvaluesofBASDAIweresignificantlyhigherinenthesitic (4.96±2.22)and combined(axialand peripheral;4.50±2.38) forms,comparedtopureforms,bothaxial(3.78±2.28) and peripheral(3.87±2.23)(Table3).

Withregardtodemographicvariables,BASDAIwas signifi-cantlyhigherinfemales(P<0.001)andinthosepatientswho didnotexerciseregularly(P<0.001).Ethnicity,HLA-B27 and familyhistoryofSpAdidnotinfluencetheresultsofBASDAI (Table4).

Numerous clinical variables influenced BASDAI scores. Inflammatorylowbackpain(P=0.039),buttockpain(P<0.001), neck pain (P<0.001), hip pain (P<0.001), arthritis oflower (P=0.004)andupper(P=0.025)limbs,andenthesitis(P=0.040) weresignificantlyassociatedwithhighermeanvaluesof BAS-DAI.Extra-articularmanifestationssuchasuveitis,psoriasis,

Table3–ResultsofBASDAIaccordingtoclinicalform.

% Mean SD P

Mixed 48.5 4.50 2.38

Axial 34.5 3.78 2.28 <0.001 Peripheral 11.0 3.87 2.23

Enthesitic 6.0 4.96 2.22

Table4–ResultsofBASDAIaccordingtoepidemiological data.

% Mean SD P

Gender

Male 72.3 3.97 2.95 <0.001 Female 27.7 4.84 3.05

Race

White 67.4 4.03 2.38 0.057 Non-white 32.6 4.30 2.40

Exercise

Yes 40.8 3.89 2.35 <0.001

No 59.2 4.42 2.38

Familyhistory

Yes 18.0 4.32 2.49 0.413

No 82.0 4.18 2.36

HLA-B27

Positive 69.0 4.16 2.33 0.391

(5)

Table5–ResultsofBASDAIaccordingtoclinicaldata.

% Mean SD P

Inflammatorylowbackpain 0.049

Yes 67.6 4.29 2.31

No 32.4 4.02 2.53

Buttockpain <0.001

Yes 33.1 4.59 2.39

No 66.9 4.01 2.36

Neckpain <0.001

Yes 30.8 4.64 2.32

No 69.2 4.01 2.39

Hippain <0.001

Yes 25.1 4.63 2.35

No 74.9 4.06 2.38

Arthritis,lowerlimb 0.004

Yes 48.9 4.38 2.35

No 51.1 4.03 2.30

Arthritis,upperlimb

Yes 22.1 4.46 2.40 0.025

No 77.9 4.13 2.37

Enthesitis 0.040

Yes 27.1 4.41 2.41

No 72.9 4.13 2.37

Dactylitis 0.423

Yes 9.1 4.04 2.48

No 90.9 4.22 2.37

Uveitis 0.926

Yes 19.1 4.22 2.53

No 80.9 4.20 2.35

Skinpsoriasis 0.849

Yes 17.8 4.23 2.42

No 82.2 4.20 2.38

Inflammatoryboweldisease 0.106

Yes 4.7 4.67 2.46

No 95.3 4.18 2.38

Urethritis

Yes 4.4 4.51 2.57 0.326

No 95.6 4.19 2.37

inflammatoryboweldiseaseandurethritisdidnotinfluence BASDAIscores(Table5).

Withregardtotreatment,onlytheuseofanti-TNF biolog-icalagentswassignificantlyassociatedwithlowerscoresof BASDAI(P<0.001),whiletheuseofNSAIDs,corticosteroids, methotrexateandsulfasalazinedidnotinfluencethevalues ofBASDAI(Table6).

Discussion

ThisstudyaimedtoevaluatetheactivityofSpAusing BAS-DAI as a clinical activity index; this is a tool traditionally usedinpatientswithSpA.TheresultsshowedthatBASDAI coulddemonstrate “diseaseactivity”,bothinpatients with anaxialcomponentasinthosewithperipheralinvolvement, eveninpatients withSpA but withno diagnosis ofAS.In view of the fact that BASDAI evaluate “axial” (question 2) and“peripheral”(questions3and4)components,an impor-tant finding in this study was represented by the highest meanscoresinpatientswhohadaninvolvementdescribedas “combined”(wherethe“axial”and“peripheral”components areobservedinthesamepatient)–acommon characteris-ticofBrazilianpatients.20Similarly,anEuropeanmulticenter

Table6–ResultsofBASDAIaccordingtotreatment.

% Mean SD P

NSAID 0.888

Yes 67.6 4.21 2.35

No 32.4 4.19 2.45

NSAIDon-demand 0.713

Yes 24.9 4.16 2.40

No 75.1 4.22 2.38

Corticosteroid 0.297

Yes 35.3 4.29 2.37

No 64.7 4.16 2.39

Methotrexate 0.866

Yes 51.7 4.21 2.32

No 48.3 4.19 2.45

Sulfasalazine 0.934

Yes 44.7 4.21 2.44

No 55.3 4.19 2.34

Biologicals <0.001

Yes 20.4 3.73 2.47

No 79.6 4.32 2.35

Infliximab <0.001

Yes 15.3 3.58 2.50

No 84.7 4.32 2.35

Etanercept 0.104

Yes 2.8 4.78 2.30

No 97.2 4.19 2.38

Adalimumab

Yes 2.3 3.70 2.06 0.164

No 97.7 4.22 2.39

studyevaluating214patientswithSpAfoundhighervalues ofBASDAIinthoseparticipantswithaperipheralcomponent (4.4±2.3)comparedtopatientswithanisolatedaxial compo-nent(3.1±1.9)(P<0.001).21Alsoimportantwasthefactthat

themeanvaluesofBASDAIweresignificantlyelevated,bothin presenceofaxial(inflammatorylowbackpain,buttockpain, neckpainandhippain)andperipheral(lowerandupperjoints) clinicalvariables,inadditiontoenthesitis.

InthespectrumofSpA,psoriaticarthritisisthatdisease wheretheperipheralcomponentismoststriking.Ourstudy showedthatBASDAIcanalsobeeffectiveintheevaluationof patientswithPA,asshowninrecentstudies,22,23evenwhen

comparedtoASDAS.24

With the proposition of ASDAS as a valid method of assessingdiseaseactivityincasesofAS,14,15itwillbe

impor-tanttoapplythistooltopatientswithSpAinthesecondphase ofRBE,tocompareitseffectivenessversusBASDAI.Thereis noestablishedconsensusaboutwhatisthebestmethodfor assessmentofdiseaseactivityinpatientswithAS(ifASDAS isbetterthanBASDAI).Meanwhile,BASDAIhasbeenshown asanefficientindexinthetherapeuticfollow-upofpatients withAS.6,25,26ThecombinationofBASDAIwiththefunctional

index BASFI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index)27madeitpossibletoobtainimportantcharacteristics

ofpatientsintheBrazilianRegistryofSpondyloarthritides.28

Althoughrepresentingonly27.7%ofthepatients,women had higher mean BASDAI scores, when compared tomen. These results certainly may vary with the population evaluated.29

(6)

differenceinBASDAIscoresinrelationtoHLA-B27,family his-toryandextra-articularmanifestationswasfound.

In short, BASDAI showed to be an efficient method of assessingdiseaseactivityinaheterogeneouspopulationof BrazilianpatientswithSpA.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theelectronicversion ofthe Brazilian Registry of Spondy-loarthritidesissupportedbyagrantfromWyeth/PfizerBrazil, whichhasnoinfluenceonthecaptureandanalysisofdata, aswellasinthewritingandpublicationofarticles.Dr. Per-civalSampaio-BarrosreceivedaresearchgrantfromFederico Foundation.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1. SieperJ,RudwaleitM,BaraliakosX,BrandtJ,BraunJ, Burgos-VargasR,etal.TheAssessmentofSpondyloarthritis InternationalSociety(Asas)handbook:aguidetoassess spondyloarthritis.AnnRheumDis.2009;68Suppl.II:ii1–44. 2. VanderHeijdeD,LandewéR.Assessmentofdiseaseactivity,

functionandqualityoflife.In:WeismanMH,ReveilleJD,Van derHeijdeD,editors.Ankylosingspondylitisandthe spondyloarthropathies.MosbyElsevier,Filadélfia,1a.ed.;

2006.p.206–13.

3. GarrettS,JenkinsonT,KennedyLG,WhitelockH,GaisfordP, CalinA.Anewapproachtodefiningdiseasestatusin ankylosingspondylitis:theBathAnkylosingSpondylitis DiseaseActivityIndex.JRheumatol.1994;21:2286–91. 4. VanderHeijdeD,SieperJ,MaksymowychW,DougadosM,

Burgos-VargasR,LandewéR,etal.2010updateofthe internationalAsasrecommendationsfortheuseofanti-TNF agentsinpatientswithaxialspondyloarthritis.AnnRheum Dis.2011;70:905–8.

5. Sampaio-BarrosPD,PinheiroMM,XimenesAC,MeirellesES, KeisermanM,AzevedoVF,etal.Recomendac¸õessobre diagnósticoetratamentodaespondiliteanquilosante.Rev BrasReumatol.2013;53:242–57.

6. RudwaleitM,ListingJ,BrandtJ,BraunJ,SieperJ.Predictionof amajorclinicalresponse(Basdai50)totumournecrosis factoralphablockersinankylosingspondylitis.AnnRheum Dis.2004;63:665–70.

7. ClaudepierreP,SibiliaJ,GoupilleP,FlipoRM,WendlingD, EulryF,etal.EvaluationofaFrenchversionoftheBath AnkylosingSpondylitisDiseaseActivityIndexinpatients withspondyloarthropathy.JRheumatol.1997;24:1954–8. 8. WaldnerA,CronstedtH,StenstromCH.TheSwedishversion

oftheBathAnkylosingSpondylitisDiseaseActivityIndex. Reliabilityandvalidity.ScandJRheumatol.1999;111 Suppl:10–6.

9. BrandtJ,WesthoffG,RudwaleitM,ListingJ,ZinkA,BraunJ, etal.AdaptionandvalidationoftheBathAnkylosing SpondylitisDiseaseActivityIndex(Basdai)forusein Germany.ZRheumatol.2003;62:264–73.

10.CardielMH,Londo ˜noJD,GutierrezE,Pacheco-TenaC, Vazquez-MelladoJ,Burgos-VargasR.Translation, cross-culturaladaptation,andvalidationoftheBath AnkylosingSpondylitisFunctionalIndex(Basfi),theBath AnkylosingSpondylitisDiseaseActivityIndex(Basdai),and theDougadosFunctionalIndex(DFI)inaSpanishspeaking populationwithspondyloarthropathies.ClinExpRheumatol. 2003;21:451–8.

11.AkkocY,KaratepeAG,AkarS,KirazliY,AkkocN.ATurkish versionoftheBathAnkylosingSpondylitisDiseaseActivity Index:reliabilityandvalidity.RheumatolInt.2005;25: 280–4.

12.ElMiedanyY,YoussefS,MehannaA,ShebryaN,AbuGamraS, ElGaafaryM.Definingdiseasestatusinankylosing

spondylitis:validationandcross-culturaladaptationofthe ArabicBathAnkylosingSpondylitisFunctionalIndex(Basfi), theBathAnkylosingSpondylitisDiseaseActivityIndex (Basdai),andtheBathAnkylosingSpondylitisGlobalscore (Basg).ClinRheumatol.2008;27:605–12.

13.CusmanichKG(Dissertac¸ãodeMestrado)Validac¸ãoparaa línguaportuguesadosinstrumentosdeavaliac¸ãodeíndice funcionaleíndicedeatividadededoenc¸aempacientescom espondiliteanquilosante.FaculdadedeMedicinada UniversidadedeSãoPaulo;2006.

14.VanderHeijdeD,LieE,KvienTK,SieperJ,VandenBoschF, ListingJ,etal.ASDAS,ahighlydiscriminatoryAsas-endorsed diseaseactivityscoreinpatientswithankylosingspondylitis. AnnRheumDis.2009;68:1811–8.

15.MachadoP,LandewéR,LieE,KvienTK,BraunJ,BakerD,etal. AnkylosingSpondylitisDiseaseActivityScore(Asdas): definingcut-offvaluesfordiseaseactivitystatesand improvementscores.AnnRheumDis.2011;70:47–53. 16.DougadosM,vanderLindenS,JulinR,HuitfeldB,AmorB,

CalinA,etal.TheEuropeanSpondyloarthropathyStudy Grouppreliminarycriteriafortheclassificationof spondyloarthropathy.ArthritisRheum.1991;34: 1218–27.

17.VanderLindenS,ValkenburgHA,CatsA.Evaluationof diagnosticcriteriaforankylosingspondylitis.Aproposalfor modificationoftheNewYorkcriteria.ArthritisRheum. 1984;27:361–8.

18.MollJMH,WrightV.Psoriaticarthritis.SeminArthritis Rheum.1973;3:55–78.

19.KingsleyG,SieperJ.ThirdInternationalWorkshopon ReactiveArthritis,23–26September1995,Berlin,Germany. AnnRheumDis.1996;55:564–84.

20.GallinaroAL,VenturaC,Sampaio-BarrosPD,Gonc¸alvesCR. Espondiloartrites:análisedeumasériebrasileiracomparada aumagrandecasuísticaibero-americana(estudoRespondia). RevBrasReumatol.2010;50:581–9.

21.Heuft-DorenboschL,VanTubergenA,SpoorenbergA, LandewéR,DougadosM,MielantsH,etal.Theinfluenceof peripheralarthritisondiseaseactivityinankylosing spondylitispatientsasmeasuredwithBathAnkylosing SpondylitisDiseaseActivityIndex.ArthritisRheum. 2004;51:154–9.

22.TaylorWJ,HarrisonAA.CouldtheBathAnkylosing

SpondylitisDiseaseActivityIndex(Basdai)beavalidmeasure ofdiseaseactivityinpatientswithpsoriaticarthritis? ArthritisRheum.2004;51:311–5.

23.Fernandez-SueiroJL,WillischA,Pertega-DiazS,TasendeJA, Fernández-LópezJC,VillarNO,etal.ValidityoftheBath AnkylosingSpondylitisDiseaseActivityIndexforthe evaluationofdiseaseactivityinaxialpsoriaticarthritis. ArthritisCareRes.2010;62:78–85.

24.EderL,ChandranV,ShenH,CookRJ,GladmanDD.IsAsdas betterthanBasdaiasameasureofdiseaseactivityinaxial psoriaticarthritis?AnnRheumDis.2010;69:2160–4.

25.GlintborgB,OstergaardM,KroghNS,DreyerL,KristensenHL, HetlandML.Predictorsoftreatmentresponseanddrug continuationin842patientswithankylosingspondylitis treatedwithanti-tumournecrosisfactor:resultsfrom8 years’surveillanceintheDanishnationwideDanbioregistry. AnnRheumDis.2010;69:2002–8.

(7)

therapyinankylosingspondylitis:aprospectivelongitudinal observationalcohortstudy.ArthritisResTher.2011;13:R94. 27.CalinA,GarrettS,WhitelockH,KennedyLG,O’HeaJ,Malorie

P,etal.Anewapproachtodefiningfunctionalabilityin ankylosingspondylitis:thedevelopmentoftheBath AnkylosingFunctionalIndex.JRheumatol.1994;21:2281–5. 28.ValimV,MarianelliBF,BortoluzzoAB,Gonc¸alvesCR,Bragada

SilvaJA,XimenesAC,etal.Aplicac¸ãodoBasfi(Bath AnkylosingSpondylitisFunctionalIndex)numacoortede pacientesdoRegistroBrasileirodeEspondiloartrites(RBE). RevBrasReumatol.1492(submetido).

29.RoussouE,SultanaS.Spondyloarthritisinwomen: differencesindiseaseonset,clinicalpresentation,andBath AnkylosingSpondylitisDiseaseActivityandFunctional indices(BasdaiandBasfi)betweenmenandwomenwith spondyloarthritides.ClinRheumatol.2011;30:

121–7.

30.RoussouE,SultanaS.Earlyspondyloarthritisinmultiracial society:differencesbetweengender,race,anddisease subgroupswithregardtofirstsymptomatpresentation,main problemthatthediseaseiscausingtopatients,and

Imagem

Table 3 – Results of BASDAI according to clinical form.
Table 6 – Results of BASDAI according to treatment.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

FM: fibromyalgia; SD: standard deviation; BASDAI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index ; BASFI: Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index ; ASQoL:

AS, ankylosing spondylitis; NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; BASDAI, Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index; BASMI, Bath ankylosing spondylitis metrology

AS patients had de- termination of disease activity (through BASDAI or Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Dis- ease activity index), ASDAS (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score,

measure disease activity: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), 2,3 functional capacity evaluation, 6,7 radiologic findings (The Bath Ankylosing

AS – Ankylosing Spondylitis; ASAS – Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society; ASDAS – Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; axSpA – axial

ASAS, Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society; ASDAS, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; axSpA, axial spondyloarthritis; BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing

Foi, então, a partir deste contexto histórico de expansão e consolidação da educação tecnológica no Brasil que se buscou, no presente estudo, um olhar para o

Décret-loi sur l’entrée et permanence (2001) Réglementation du Traité Portugal – Brésil Création du Haut Commissariat pour l’Immigration et Minorités