• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.65 número5

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.65 número5"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texto

(1)

REVISTA

BRASILEIRA

DE

ANESTESIOLOGIA

OfficialPublicationoftheBrazilianSocietyofAnesthesiology

www.sba.com.br

SCIENTIFIC

ARTICLE

Lidocaine

alleviates

propofol

related

pain

much

better

than

metoprolol

and

nitroglycerin

Asutay

Goktug

a

,

Handan

Gulec

b,∗

,

Suna

Akin

Takmaz

a

,

Esra

Turkyilmaz

c

,

Hulya

Basar

a

aDepartmentofAnaesthesiology,AnkaraEducationandResearchHospital,Ankara,Turkey bDepartmentofAnaesthesiology,KeciorenEducationandResearchHospital,Ankara,Turkey cDepartmentofAnaesthesiology,ZekaiTahirBurakEducationandResearchHospital,Ankara,Turkey

Received25November2013;accepted2January2014 Availableonline13February2014

KEYWORDS

Propofolpain; Lidocaine; Nitroglycerin; Metoprolol

Abstract

Backgroundandobjectives: Injectionpain afterpropofoladministrationiscommonandmay disturbpatients’comfort.Theaimofthisstudywastocompareeffectivenessofintravenous (iv)nitroglycerin,lidocaineandmetoprololappliedthroughtheveinsonthedorsumofhandor antecubitalveinoneliminatingpropofolinjectionpain.

Method: Therewere147patientsandtheyweregroupedaccordingtotheanalgesic adminis-tered.Metoprolol(n=31,GroupM),lidocaine(n=32,GroupL)andnitroglycerin(n=29,Group N)wereappliedthroughivcatheteratdorsumhandveinorantecubitalvein.Painwas evalu-atedby4pointscale(0---nopain,1---lightpain,2---mildpain,3---severepain)in5,10,15 and20thseconds.ASA,BMI,patientdemographics,educationlevelandtheeffectofpathways forinjectionandlocationofoperationswereanalyzedfortheireffectontotalpainscore.

Results:Therewerenodifferencesbetweenthegroupsintermsoftotalpainscore(p=0.981). Therewere nodifferences intermsoftotalpain scoredepending onASA,education level, locationofoperation.However,lidocainewasmoreeffectivewhencomparedwithmetoprolol (p=0.015)andnitroglycerin(p=0.001)amonggroups.Althoughneitherlidocainenor metopro-lolhadanydifferenceonpainmanagementwhenappliedfromantecubitalordorsalhandvein (p>0.05),nitroglycerininjectionfromantecubitalveinhaddemonstratedstatisticallylower painscores(p=0.001).

Conclusion:We found lidocaine to be the most effective analgesic in decreasing propofol relatedpain.Wethereforesuggestivlidocaineforalleviatingpropofolrelatedpainat opera-tions.

©2014SociedadeBrasileiradeAnestesiologia.PublishedbyElsevier EditoraLtda.Allrights reserved.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:handandrhandan@yahoo.com.tr(H.Gulec).

0104-0014/$–seefrontmatter©2014SociedadeBrasileiradeAnestesiologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Allrightsreserved.

(2)

PALAVRAS-CHAVE

Dornolocalda injec¸ãodepropofol; Lidocaína;

Nitroglicerina; Metoprolol

Lidocaínaémaiseficazdoquemetoprololenitroglicerinaparaoalíviodador relacionadaàinjec¸ãodepropofol

Resumo

Justificativaeobjetivos: Adornolocaldainjec¸ãoapósaadministrac¸ãodepropofolécomum epodecausardesconfortonospacientes.Oobjetivodesteestudofoicompararaeficáciade nitroglicerina,lidocaínaemetoprolol,aplicadosintravenosamenteatravésdeveiasdodorso dasmãosouantecubitais,paraeliminaradorcausadapelainjec¸ãodepropofol.

Métodos: Foramalocadosemgrupos147pacientesdeacordocomoanalgésicoadministrado: metoprolol(n=31,GrupoM),lidocaína(n=32,GrupoL)enitroglicerina(n=29,GrupoN).Os analgésicosforamaplicadosviacateterintravenosoemveiadodorsodamãoouantecubital.A dorfoiavaliadacomumaescaladequatropontos(0=semdor,1=dorleve,2=dormoderada, 3=dorintensa)nossegundoscinco,10,15e20.Osdadosdemográficosdospacientes,estado físicoASA,IMC,níveldeescolaridade,efeitodasviasdeinjec¸ãoelocaldascirurgiasforam analisadosquantoaseusefeitosnoescoretotaldedor.

Resultados: Nãohouvediferenc¸aentreosgruposemrelac¸ãoaoescoretotaldedor(p=0,981). Nãohouvediferenc¸anoescoretotaldedoremrelac¸ãoaoestadofísicoASA,escolaridadeelocal dacirurgia.Noentanto,lidocaínafoimaiseficazemcomparac¸ãocommetoprolol(p=0,015)e nitroglicerina(p=0,001),nacomparac¸ãoentreosgrupos.Emboralidocaínaemetoprololnão tenhamapresentadodiferenc¸anotratamentodadorquandoaplicadosemveiaantecubitalou dodorsodamão(p>0,05),ainjec¸ãodenitroglicerinaemveiaantecubitalapresentouescores dedorestatisticamentemenores(p=0,001).

Conclusão:Lidocaínamostrou-secomoanalgésicomaiseficazparadiminuiradorrelacionadaà injec¸ãodepropofol.Sugerimos,portanto,lidocaínaIVparaaliviaradorrelacionadaàinjec¸ão depropofolemoperac¸ões.

©2014SociedadeBrasileira deAnestesiologia.PublicadoporElsevierEditoraLtda.Todosos direitosreservados.

Introduction

Propofol is an intravenous agent which is often preferred forsamedaysurgeryandhasshortperiodeffects.Injection painisthemostcommonpainandoneoftheadverseeffects disturbingpatients’comfort.Injectionpainincidencerateis 28---90%foradultsinthecourseofinduction.1,2Various

meth-odsanddrugsaretestedandsuggestedinordertoeliminate

injectionpaincaused by Propofol.Forthis purpose,some

studiesabout injectionspeed ofpropofol,temperatureof

propofol and the vein immensity have been carried

out-fordecreasingpain.Beforepropofolinjection,somedrugs

suchasalfentanyl,tramadol,ketamine,fentanyl,morphine,

meperidine,metoprololandlidocainehave beenusedand

the effectiveness of these drugs on eliminating injection

painhasbeentested.3---10

Althoughtherearemanyresearchesonanalgesiceffects

oftransdermalnitroglycerin,researchesabouteffectiveness

ofnitroglycerin oneliminating propofolinjectionpainare

limited.2Theaimofthisstudywastocompareeffectiveness

ofintravenous (iv)nitroglycerin,lidocaineandmetoprolol

appliedthroughtheveinsonthedorsumofhandon

elimi-natingpropofolinjectionpainandthemainpurposeofthis

studywastoensuresatisfactionofpatients.

Methods

Aftertheapprovalofpatientsandhospitalethics

commit-tee,92patientsattheagesbetween19and70yearshave

been involved intherandomizeddoubleblind methodfor

theresearchplannedinelective conditionsat HM(Health

Ministry) Ankara Training and Research Hospital in

accor-dancewithclassificationgroupIandIIofAmericanSocietyof

Anesthesiologist.Hypertensivepatients,diabeticpatientsor

patientswithanotherneuropathy,patientswhosebodymass

indexis 35kgm−2 orabove,patientswithallergytothese

drugsand withParkinson’sdisease,withthrombophlebitis

storyhavebeenexcludedfromthisresearch.

Routine monitorization including ECG, pulse oximeter

and non-invasive blood pressure have been applied to

patients who have undergone intramuscular (im)

preme-dicationwith50mg meperidine and0.5mg atropineafter

intravenousline(iv) hasbeen openedat thedorsumhand

veinwith20G catheter.Drugs that hadtobeusedin the

researchhavebeenpreparedas2mlintotalandnumbered

byaresearcherindependentfromapplicator.Aftervenous

discharge,tourniquetwereappliedtoarmmanuallyfor45s

and2mgmetoprololto31patientsinGroupM,20mg

lido-caineto32patientsinGroupL,0.25mgnitroglycerinto29

patients in Group N were applied through iv catheter at

dorsumhand vein. Aftertourniquet was loosened up, for

anesthesiainduction2mg/kg propofolwasinjectedwitha

flowof2mlin4s.Theadministrationpathwayswereused

forcomparisonofdifferentanalgesics.

Painduringinjectionwasevaluatedinthe4pointscale

(0---nopain,1---lightpain,2---mildpain,3---severepain)at

5,10,15and20thseconds.Patientsweregroupedaccording

to their education levels as: 1 --- illiterate, 2 --- primary

school,3---secondaryschool,4---highschool,5---university

(3)

scorewasdone.ASAclassificationandBMIwerecompared

withtotalpainscoreusingtheabovementionedscale.Inthe

pre-operativeperiod,after propofolinduction andshortly

afterintubation 5minlater,heartrateandbloodpressure

wererecorded.Thefifteenthsecondwasdeterminedasthe

maintimebecausepainfrequencywasobservedinthistime

atmost.Inthatcase,totalpainscoreinsteadofpainscore

measured after injection is more effective in reflecting

satisfactionofpatientsandtotallifequalityscore.Location

ofoperationwasrecordedanditwascomparedwithtotal

painscore.The locationwasnumberedas0--- head---neck

(n=65), 1 ---thorax (n=1),2 --- upperabdomen (n=23),3

--- lower abdomen and pelvis (n=57), 4 --- extremity and

paraspinal area(n=31). The operation at thorax wasnot

included into the evaluation because therewas only one

patient.

ANOVA variance analysis has been used for statistical

analysisoftheresultsanddemographicdataand2testhas

beenusedforcomparisonofgroupsintermsofpain.Because

thedistributionofgroupswasnormal,pulseoximetry,

arte-rial blood pressure and heart rate measurements among

groups were evaluatedaccording to thevariance analysis

andBonferronitest.Ap<0.05wasconsideredsignificant.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 40 years (range,

19---70 years) and the mean BMI (body mass index) was

25.34±3.94kgm−2. There were 81 female and 66 male

patients.Nodifferencewasfoundamongthegroupsinterms

ofdemographicaldatasuchasage,gender,andbodymass

index (p>0.05). Also there were no differences in terms

oftotalpainscoredependingoneducationlevel(p>0.05).

Number of patients withpain according to timeintervals

whileadministrationofanalgesicfromantecubitalareaand

dorsumofhandareshown inTables1 and2.Alsonumber

of patients withpain when lidocaine (n=60), metoprolol

Table1 Numberofpatients withpainaccordingtotime intervals while administration of analgesic from back of hand.

Patientswith painat

GroupL (n=32)

GroupM (n=31)

GroupN (n=29)

p

5thsec 1 5 9 0.052

10thsec 6 9 18 0.023

15thsec 6 11 22 0.001

20thsec 3 14 22 0.001

L,Lidocaine;M,Metoprolol;N,Nitroglycerin.

Table2 Numberofpatients withpainaccordingtotime intervalswhileadministrationofanalgesicfromantecubital area.

Patientswith painat

GroupL (n=29)

GroupM (n=27)

GroupN (n=29)

p

5thsec 0 3 3 0.095

10thsec 0 5 4 0.261

15thsec 2 6 6 0.589

20thsec 0 4 10 0.011

L,Lidocaine;M,Metoprolol;N,Nitroglycerin.

Table 3 Number of patients with pain when Lidocaine (n=60)wasinjectedfromdifferentpathways.

Patientswith painat

GroupE (n=31)

GroupA (n=29)

p

5thsec 1 1 1.0

10thsec 6 6 0.101

15thsec 6 2 0.317

20thsec 3 3 0.228

A,antecubitalarea;E,backofhand.

Table 4 Numberof patients with pain when Metoprolol (n=59)wasinjectedfromdifferentpathways.

Patientswith painat

GroupE (n=32)

GroupA (n=27)

p

5thsec 5 1 0.108

10thsec 3 2 0.463

15thsec 11 6 0.712

20thsec 14 4 0.071

A,antecubitalarea;E,backofhand.

(n=59) and nitroglycerin (n=58) were injected from dif-ferentpathwaysareshowninTables3---5.Althoughneither

lidocainenormetoprololhad anydifferenceonpain

man-agementwhenappliedfromantecubitalordorsalhandvein

(p>0.05),nitroglycerininjectionfromantecubitalveinhad

demonstratedstatisticallylowerpainscores(p=0.001).

Totalpainscoreinwomenwas1.63±2.89andtotalpain

score in men was1.62±2.44. There were no differences

betweenthegroupsintermsoftotalpainscore(p=0.981).

WhenASAIandIIdifferencesaretakenintoconsideration,

therewerenosignificantdifferencesthatexistedamongthe

groupsintermsoftotalpainscore(ASAI=134,ASAII=42)

(p=0.661).ThemeanpainscoresatASA-IandASA-IIpatients

were1.63±2.58and1.42±2.82,respectively.

The total pain score in patients who have undergone

extremityandspinaloperationshasbeenmeasuredhasthe

lowest rate when compared with other locations. There

were no differences among other areas in terms of pain

score.Lidocainewasmore effective whencomparedwith

metoprolol(p=0.015)andnitroglycerin(p=0.001).

Further-more,metoprololwasleasteffectivewhencomparedwith

nitroglycerinintermsoftotalpainscore(p=0.002).Intotal

painscoreevaluation,injectionsinantecubitalareaswere

determinedtobemoreadvantageous(p=0.001).Totalpain

scoreforthegroupincludingpatientswithBMIlowerthan

30,withnormalBMIandhighBMIwas1.40±2.48kgm−2.For

Table5 NumberofpatientswithpainwhenNitroglycerin (n=58)wasinjectedfromdifferentpathways.

Patientswith painat

GroupE (n=29)

GroupA (n=29)

p

5thsec 9 3 0.132

10thsec 18 4 0.001

15thsec 22 6 0.001

20thsec 22 10 0.014

(4)

theobesegroup(n=30),thescorewas2.70±3.38kgm−2. The total pain score for obese patients was statistically higher(p=0.016).

Discussion

Because propofol injection causes negative experiences about anesthesiaand restricts comfort of patients, some studieshavebeen carriedouttofindvariousmethods and tools.Thepropofol,whichisaphenol,causesirritationat skin,mucous membranesandintimaoftheveins.11 Direct

endotelial irritation of nerve endings caused by propofol

causessecretionofbradykininbystimulatingkallikrein-kinin

cascadesystem.Thisstatebringsoutinjectionpainby

caus-ing increase in contact of free nerve endings and liquid

phaseofpropofolaswellasvenousdilatationandincrease

ofpermeability.Everydruggivenbeforepropofolinjection

alleviates pain by diluting liquid phaseof propofolwhich

hasanendotheliumirritanteffect.Itisthoughtthatpainis

relatedtoconcentrationofliquidphasealthoughthereisno

certaininformationaboutitsmechanism.12

Paincaused bypropofolinjectionemergesat earlyand

lateperiods.Painatearlyperiodisrelatedtodirecteffectof

propofolandpainatlateperiodisrelatedtolocalsecretion

ofkininogens.Atthepresentday,themostcommonagent

usedfor alleviating propofolinjection pain is lidocaine.10

Scott et al. stated that lidocaine alleviates pain by

sta-bilizing kinincascadewhile Erikssonstated thatthis agent

alleviatespainbydecreasingpHandconcentration.13,14

Propofol,byanindirectactionontheendothelium,

acti-vates the kallikrein-kinin system and releases bradykinin,

therebyproducingvenousdilationandhyperpermeability,

which increases the contact between the aqueous phase

of propofol and free nerve endings, resulting in pain on

injection.15Propofol,whendrawnupinadisposablesyringe,

mayleadtoformationofirritantsandpropofolpain.Ithas

been confirmed that propofol stripsthe siliconelubricant

from the inside barrel of plastic syringes. A reduction in

propofolpainbycoolingitto4◦Candminimizingpropofol

injectionpainis animportantclinicalgoalbecauseitmay

influencethepatient’sperceptionofqualityand

acceptabil-ityofanesthesia.Inconclusion,pretreatmentwithlidocaine

40mg, thiopental 0.25mg/kg, and thiopentone 0.5mg/kg

after manual venous occlusion attenuates propofol pain.

However, pretreatment with thiopental 0.5mg/kg after

manualvenous occlusionwasthemost effective in

atten-uatingpropofol-inducedpain.Wethereforesuggestroutine

pretreatmentwiththiopental0.5mg/kgalongwithmanual

venousocclusionfor1minforpreventionofpainassociated

withpropofolinjection.

Nitroglycerinisacommonlyusedagentintreatmentof

ischemic heart disease.16 Nitroglycerin,a strong

vasodila-tor,ismetabolizedasnitricoxide(NO)incells.NOcauses

intracellular concentration of cylicguanosine

monophos-phate(cGMP)whichleadstopainmodulationincentraland

peripheral nervous system.17 NO,applied topically, shows

anti-inflammatoryandanalgesic effectby blocking

neuro-geniccomponentofinflammatoryedemaandhyperallergy

and inhibits adhesion of neutrophils to endothelium

sur-face. The fact that transdermal nitroglycerin is effective

in paintreatment hasbeen provenwithvariousstudies.18

Transdermal nitroglycerin shows vasodilation effect and

analgesic effectby increasing diffusion of local

anesthet-icsandarrivaltonervetrunk.19Nitroglycerinpomadeshows

analgesiceffectandvasodilatoreffectinveinsizes.20

Nitroglycerinis metabolizedtonitric oxide(NO)inthe

cell.17,21 NO causes increase in the intracellular

concen-trationof, whichproduces painmodulationin thecentral

andperipheralnervoussystem.NOgeneratorsalsoinduce

anti-inflammatoryeffectsandanalgesiabyblocking

hyper-algesia and the neurogenic component of inflammatory

edema by topical application.22 Another possible

mech-anism includes an analgesic effect through the direct

stimulation of peripheral fibers mimicking the actions

of locally appliedacetylcholine.23 Mechanisms mentioned

above, or their combinations, might contribute to the

analgesic effects of nitroglycerin added to lidocaine in

intravenous regional anesthesia. The clinical efficacy of

transdermal nitroglycerin for acute pain relief has been

documentedin several studies.23 Nitroglycerin was found

to be useful for the treatment of shoulder pain and

thrombophlebitis and for enhancing the effect of spinal

sufentanilorneostigmine.22Laurettietal.alsoshowedthat

deliveryofNOdonors(transdermalnitroglycerin)together

with.24

Opioidsmaybeofsignificantbenefitincancerpain

man-agement,delayingmorphinetolerance anddecreasingthe

frequencyofadverseeffectsrelatedtolargedosesofopioid.

Ithasbeenconcludedthat0.25nitroglycerinislesseffective

inalleviatingpropofolinjectionpaincomparedtolidocaine

andmetroprolol.Wehaveconcludedthathigherpainrates

inobesepatientsstemsfromstandardamountof

premedi-cation.Inotherwords,amountofdrugsperkiloislowerin

obesepatients

Nitroglycerinis metabolizedtonitric oxide(NO)inthe

cell.17,21NOcausesanincreaseintheintracellular

concen-trationofcyclicguanosinemonophosphate,whichproduces

pain modulation in the central and peripheral nervous

system.24,17 NO generators also induce anti-inflammatory

effects and analgesia by blocking hyperalgesia and the

neurogenic component of inflammatory edema by

top-ical application.22 Another possible mechanism includes

an analgesic effect through the direct stimulation of

peripheral fibers mimicking the actions of locally applied

acetylcholine.17,23As¸ıketal.havestatedthatpre-treatment

with(iv)metoprololisaseffectiveaslidocaineinalleviating

propofolinjectionpain.10

In conclusion, we found Lidocaine to be the most

effective analgesic in decreasing propofol related pain.

Wetherefore suggest iv Lidocaine for alleviatingpropofol

relatedpainatoperations.However,nitroglycerininjection

intoantecubitalveinshasyieldedlowerlevelsofpropofol

relatedpain. Also we have confirmed that injection pain

isnotrelatedtogenderandeducationlevel.Furthermore,

wefoundthatinjectionpainisrelatedtoobesityandtotal

pain score in obese patients was statistically higher. For

evaluation of total pain score, antecubital area is more

advantageousthanthedorsumofthehand.

Conflict

of

interest

(5)

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ismail Demirkale, MD, for hisvaluable

guidanceandsupportoncompletionofthisarticle.

References

1.LyonsB,LohanD,FlynnC,etal.Modificationofpainon injec-tion of propofol.A comparison of pethidine and lignocaine. Anaesthesia.1996;5:394---5.

2.MangarD,HolakEJ.Tourniquetat50mmHgfollowedby intra-venouslidocainediminisheshandpainassociatedwithpropofol injection.AnesthAnalg.1992;74:250---2.

3.Shimizu T, Inomata S, Kihara S, et al. Rapid injection reducespain oninjectionwithpropofol.EurJ Anaesthesiol. 2005;22:394---6.

4.GrauersA,Liljeroth E,AkesonJ.Propofolinfusionrate does not affect localpain on injection. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002;46:361---3.

5.Seki S, Sekine R, Aketa K, et al. Induction of anesthesia with propofol injected through a central catheter. Masui. 1999;48:62---6.

6.NathansonMH,GajrajNM,RussellJA.Preventionofinjection ofpropofol:acomparisonoflidocainewithalfentanil.Anesth Analg.1996;82:469---71.

7.WongWH, CheongKF. Roleof tramadol in reducing painon propofolinjection.SingaporeMedJ.2001;42:193---5.

8.BatraYK,AlQattanAR,MarzoukHM,etal.Ketamine pretreat-mentwithvenousocclusionattenuatespainoninjectionwith propofol.EurJAnaesthesiol.2005;22:69---70.

9.PangWW,MokMS,HuangS,etal.Theanalgesiceffectof fen-tanyl,morphine,meperidine,and lidocaineintheperipheral veins:acomparativestudy.AnesthAnalg.1998;86:382---6.

10.As¸ıkI,Yörüko˘gluD,GülayI,etal.Painoninjectionofpropofol; comparisonofmetoprololwithlidocaine.EurJAnaesthesiol. 2003;20:487---9.

11.AmbeshSP,DubeyPK,SinhaPK.Ondansetronpretreatmentto alleviatepainonpropofolinjection:arandomized,controlled, double-blindedstudy.AnesthAnalg.1999;89:197---9.

12.Klement W, Arndt JO. Pain on injection of propofol: effectsofconcentrationand diluent. BrJAnaesth.1991;67: 281---4.

13.ScottRPF, SaundersDA, Norman J. Propofol:clinical strate-giesfor preventing pain on injection. Anaesthesia.1988;43: 492---4.

14.ErikssonM.Prilocainereducesinjectionpaincausedby propo-fol.ActaAnaesthScan.1995;39:210---3.

15.SimJY,LeeSH,ParkDY,etal.Painoninjectionwith microemul-sionpropofol.BrJClinPharmacol.2009;67:316---25.

16.ThomasG,RamwellPW.Nitricoxide,donors,and inhibitors. In:KatzungBG,editor.Basicandclinicalpharmacology.7thed. AppletonandLange:Stamford;1998.p.319---24.

17.LaurettiGR,OliveiraR,ReisMP,etal.Transdermalnitroglycerin enhancesspinal sufentanil postoperative analgesia following orthopedicsurgery.Anesthesiology.1999;90:734---9.

18.Glantz L, Godovic G, Lekar M, et al. Efficacy of transder-malnitroglycerin combinedwith etodolac for thetreatment ofchronic post-thoracotomypain: anopen-label prospective clinicaltrial.JPainSymptomManage.2004;27:277---81.

19.TuranA,WhitePF,KoyuncuO,etal.Transdermalnicotinepatch failed to improve postoperative pain management. Anesth Analg.2008;107:1011---7.

20.KhanlariB,LinderL,HaefeliWE.Localeffectoftransdermal isosorbidedinitrateointmentonhandveindiameter.EurJClin Pharmacol.2001;57:701---4.

21.HashimotoS,KobayashiA.Clinicalpharmacokineticsand phar-macodynamics ofglyceryltrinitrate and its metabolites. Clin Pharmacokinet.2003;42:205---21.

22.Ferreira SH, Lorenzetti BB, Faccioli LH. Blockade of hyper-algesia and neurogenic edema by topical application of nitroglycerin.EurJPharmacol.1992;217:207---9.

23.Duarte IDC,Lorenzetti BB, Ferreira SH. Peripheralanalgesia and activationof thenitricoxide-cyclicGMP pathway.EurJ Pharmacol.1990;186:289---93.

Imagem

Table 4 Number of patients with pain when Metoprolol (n = 59) was injected from different pathways.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Campina Grande, 2016. Nas últimas décadas temos vivido uma grande mudança no mercado de trabalho numa visão geral. As micro e pequenas empresas

Em se tratando do acesso à justiça, conclui-se que o processo judicial eletrônico surge como possível instrumento na solução dos novos conflitos advindos da utilização dos

sua mensuração, muitas vezes se tornam difíceis e apresentam grandes falhas de interpretação. No teste do papel a paciente fica em posição supina, que é a posição

Material e Método Foram entrevistadas 413 pessoas do Município de Santa Maria, Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, sobre o consumo de medicamentos no último mês.. Resultados

The probability of attending school four our group of interest in this region increased by 6.5 percentage points after the expansion of the Bolsa Família program in 2007 and

Na hepatite B, as enzimas hepáticas têm valores menores tanto para quem toma quanto para os que não tomam café comparados ao vírus C, porém os dados foram estatisticamente

H„ autores que preferem excluir dos estudos de prevalˆncia lesŽes associadas a dentes restaurados para evitar confus‚o de diagn€stico com lesŽes de