• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Bras. Reumatol. vol.56 número3

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Bras. Reumatol. vol.56 número3"

Copied!
6
0
0

Texto

(1)

ww w . r e u m a t o l o g i a . c o m . b r

REVISTA

BRASILEIRA

DE

REUMATOLOGIA

Original

article

Association

between

academic

performance

and

cognitive

dysfunction

in

patients

with

juvenile

systemic

lupus

erythematosus

Renan

Bazuco

Frittoli

a

,

Karina

de

Oliveira

Pelic¸ari

a

,

Bruna

Siqueira

Bellini

a

,

Roberto

Marini

b

,

Paula

Teixeira

Fernandes

c

,

Simone

Appenzeller

b,d,∗

aRheumatologyLaboratory,FaculdadedeCiênciasMédicas,UniversidadeEstadualdeCampinas(Unicamp),Campinas,SP,Brazil

bDepartmentofPediatrics,PediatricRheumatologyUnit,FaculdadedeCiênciasMédicas,UniversidadeEstadualdeCampinas

(Unicamp),Campinas,SP,Brazil

cDepartmentofSportsSciences,FaculdadedeEducac¸ãoFísica,UniversidadeEstadualdeCampinas(Unicamp),Campinas,SP,Brazil

dDepartmentofMedicine,RheumatologyUnit,FaculdadedeCiênciasMédicas,UniversidadeEstadualdeCampinas(Unicamp),

Campinas,SP,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received1September2015 Accepted12January2016 Availableonline18April2016

Keywords:

Juvenilesystemiclupus erythematosus Cognitivedysfunction Academicperformance

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Objective:Todeterminewhetherthereisanassociationbetweentheprofileofcognitive dys-functionandacademicoutcomesinpatientswithjuvenilesystemiclupuserythematosus (JSLE).

Methods:Patientsaged≤18yearsattheonsetofthediseaseandeducationlevelatorabove thefifthgradeofelementaryschoolwereselected.Cognitiveevaluationwasperformed accordingtotheAmericanCollegeofRheumatology(ACR)recommendations.Symptoms ofanxietyanddepressionwereassessedbyBeckscales;diseaseactivitywasassessedby SystemicLupusErythematosusDiseaseActivityIndex(SLEDAI);andcumulativedamage wasassessedbySystemicLupusInternationalCollaboratingClinics(SLICC).Thepresence ofautoantibodiesandmedicationusewerealsoassessed.Asignificancelevelof5%(p<0.05) wasadopted.

Results:41patientswithameanageof14.5±2.84yearswereincluded.Cognitivedysfunction wasnotedin17(41.46%)patients.Therewasasignificantworseninginmathematical perfor-manceinpatientswithcognitivedysfunction(p=0.039).Anxietysymptomswereobserved in8patients(19.51%)andwereassociatedwithvisualperception(p=0.037)andsymptoms ofdepressionwereobservedin1patient(2.43%).

Conclusion:PatientswithJSLEconcomitantlywithcognitivedysfunctionshowedworse aca-demicperformanceinmathematicscomparedtopatientswithoutcognitiveimpairment.

©2016ElsevierEditoraLtda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:appenzellersimone@yahoo.com(S.Appenzeller).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbre.2016.03.005

(2)

Associac¸ão

entre

desempenho

acadêmico

e

disfunc¸ão

cognitiva

em

pacientes

com

lúpus

eritematoso

sistêmico

juvenil

Palavras-chave:

Lúpuseritematososistêmico juvenil

Disfunc¸ãocognitiva Desempenhoacadêmico

r

e

s

u

m

o

Objetivo: Determinarseháassociac¸ãoentreoperfildedisfunc¸ãocognitivaeosresultados acadêmicosempacientescomlúpuseritematososistêmicojuvenil(LESj).

Métodos: Foramselecionadospacientescomidadedeiníciodadoenc¸a≤18anosecom escolaridade mínima doquinto anodoEnsino Fundamentalseguidosem um hospital universitário.Aavaliac¸ãocognitivafoifeitadeacordocomasrecomendac¸õesdoColégio AmericanodeReumatologia(ACR).Ossintomasdeansiedadeedepressãoforamavaliados pelasescalasBeck,aatividadedadoenc¸afoiavaliadapeloSystemicLupusErythematosus DiseaseActivityIndex(Sledai)eodanocumulativopeloSystemicLupusInternational Col-laboratingClinics(Slicc).Tambémforamavaliadosapresenc¸adeautoanticorposeousode medicac¸ão.Adotou-seníveldesignificânciade5%(p<0,05).

Resultados: Foramincluídos41pacientescommédiade14,5±2,84anos.Disfunc¸ão cog-nitivafoiobservadaem 17(41,46%).Observou-sepioriasignificativanodesempenhode matemáticaempacientescomdisfunc¸ãocognitiva(p=0,039).Sintomasdeansiedadeforam observadosemoitopacientes(19,51%)eestavamassociadosàpercepc¸ãovisual(p=0,037)e sintomasdedepressãoforamobservadosemumpaciente(2,43%).

Conclusão: Pacientescom LESjcom disfunc¸ão cognitivaapresentam pior desempenho acadêmicoemmatemáticaemrelac¸ãoapacientessemdisfunc¸ãocognitiva.

©2016ElsevierEditoraLtda.EsteéumartigoOpenAccesssobalicençadeCC BY-NC-ND(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Introduction

Systemiclupuserythematosus(SLE)isachronicand autoim-muneinflammatorydiseaseofconnectivetissue.Ofunknown etiology,SLEislinkedtogenetic,hormonal, environmental factors,and tothe use ofsome medications.This disease mostlyaffectswomeninchildbearingage,especiallybetween 15and50years.However,approximately20%ofpatientsare affected duringchildhoodor adolescence(JSLE), being pre-dominantlyoffemalegender.1–3

JSLE patients show a more severe form of the disease anddevelopneuropsychiatricsymptomsathigher frequen-ciesthaninadultpatients.4Cognitivedisordersarecommon

andaffectmainlyattention,concentration,learning,memory, informationprocessingandexecutivefunctions,eveninthe apparentabsenceofdiseaseactivityorofother neuropsychi-atricevents.5–8

Fewstudies available inthe literaturesuggest that JSLE patientsareatriskofpooracademicperformance,9,10

espe-cially causing difficulties in arithmetic learning, reading comprehension,visualmemory andinability tosolve com-plexproblems.10Forthesereasons,patientswithSLEcanmeet

fewereducationalmilestones,forexample,notfinishinghigh schoolorcollegegraduation–factorsassociatedwithalower probabilityofemploymentandofsuccessatwork.10–12Inthis

scenario,theaimofthisstudywastodeterminewhetherthere isanassociationbetweentheprofileofcognitivedysfunction andacademicoutcomesinpatientswithJSLE.

Materials

and

methods

ConsecutivepatientswithJSLEseenatthePediatric Rheuma-tologyOutpatientClinic,HospitaldasClínicas,Universidade

Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), whose clinical and lab-oratory manifestationswere routinely studied accordingto analreadyestablishedprotocol,wereselected.13,14Inclusion

criteriawere:patientswithageofonsetofdisease≤18,15and

withfifthgradeofelementaryschoolastheminimumlevelof scholarship.ThestudywasapprovedbytheResearchEthics Committee(CEPNo.920/2007)ofUNICAMPandallthe partic-ipantsandlegalguardianssignedaninformedconsentform (FICF).

Cognitive assessment was performed by a qualified psychologist through the application of a survey battery lasting about two hours, consisting of tests adapted to the juvenile population and validated for the Portuguese language and selected from the battery recommended by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR).16 The

fol-lowing tests for evaluation of cognitive functions were selected:

• Picture Arrangement Test: evaluates temporal reasoning17,18

• CodeTest:evaluatesprocessingspeed17,18

• PictureCompletionTest:evaluatesvisualperception17,18

• CubeTest:evaluatesspatialreasoning17,18

• DigitTest:assessesimmediateandworkingmemory17,18

• VocabularyTest:evaluatessemanticmemory,educational backgroundandgeneralintelligence17,18

• ReyComplexFigureTest:evaluatesperceptualorganization, planning,praxisandmemory19

• BostonNamingTest:evaluatesvisualrecognitionand nam-ingcapacity20

• FAZ Verbal Fluency Test: assesses verbal-phonological fluency21

(3)

• StroopNeuropsychologicalScreeningTest:evaluates selec-tiveattention,inhibitorycontrolandmentalflexibility23

Eachpatienthadhis/herscorescountedindividually. Seventy-onecontrolsmatchedforgender,ageand socio-economicstatuswereincludedinordertoobtainnormative dataofappliedtests.Presenceofcognitiveimpairmenthas beendefinedincasesofcognitivefunctionwithameanZ -score≤−2SDortwoormorefunctionswithameanZ-score between−1and−2SD.24

Onthedayofthecognitivetests,theschoolreportofthe lastacademicsemesterofeachparticipantwasrequested.The participantsweregroupedbydiscipline:Portuguese/English/ Spanish; Geography/History; Physical/Chemical/Biological Sciences; Mathematics;Physical Education; Arts; and Soci-ology/Philosophy. School grades ≥7 (70% success) were consideredassatisfactory.24–28

DiseaseactivitywasassessedbytheSystemicLupus Ery-thematosusDiseaseActivityIndex(SLEDAI)questionnaireand thediseasewasconsideredactiveifthesumofSLEDAIpoints was>3.29Cumulativedamagewasassessedbytheapplication

ofaquestionnairespecificallydevelopedforthispurpose,the SystemicLupusInternationalCollaboratingClinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) (SLICC/ACR-DI).30

Toassessthepresenceofdepressivesymptoms,the Chil-dren’sDepressionInventory–CDI31 forsubjects between7

and 17 years32 was applied; this tool is an adaptation of

theBDI(BeckDepressionInventory).Anxietysymptomswere assessedusingtheBeckAnxietyInventory–BAI.33,34

Lab work-up ofautoantibodies was carried out; routine techniquesusedintheClinicalPathologyLaboratoryandin theAllergyand ImmunologyResearchLaboratoryat Hospi-taldas Clínicas,UNICAMP wereused.Antinuclear antibody (ANA)(byindirectimmunofluorescence;positiveiftitle>1:40); anti-DNA antibody (by indirect immunofluorescence with

Crithidialuciliaeassubstrate)35;anti-Smithantibody(by

dou-ble immunodiffusion); anticardiolipin antibody (by enzyme immunoassay);andlupusanticoagulant(by TTPAand Rus-sell method) were determined.36 Anti-ribosomal P protein

antibody(anti-P)wasmeasuredbyEnzymeLinkedImmuno SorbentAssay(ELISA).

Medicationsprescribedonthedateofthecognitivetests were taken into account in this study. The drugs were corticosteroids, anti-malarials (chloroquine and hydroxy-chloroquine),andotherimmunosuppressivedrugs (azathio-prine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, methotrexate and mycophenolatemofetil).

StatisticalanalysiswasperformedusingtheStatisticaland GraphicalSoftware(Systat)program.Shapiro–Wilknormality test was applied forobtaining results. For statistical anal-ysis, nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis and Fisher’s exact test were performed. The significance level was set at5%, i.e.,

p<0.05.

Results

Forty-onepatientswithJSLE(meanage,14.5±2.84years),of whom38(92.68%)werefemales,wereincludedandassessed

Table1–Demographic,clinicalandimmunologicaldata ofjuvenilesystemiclupuserythematosuspatientswith andwithoutcognitiveimpairment.

Variables Patientswith cognitive dysfunction

n=17

Patients without cognitive dysfunction

n=24

p-Value

Female 17(100%) 21(87.5%) 0.128

Ageat diagnosis (mean/SD) 11.47years (2.47) 13.37years (3.53) 0.038a Disease duration (mean/SD)

5.11years(4.21) 7.58years(4.93) 0.102

Active disease 5patients (29.41%) 6patients (28.57%) 0.756 Cumulative damage 3patients (17.64%) 5patients (20.83%) 0.75

Anxiety 5patients

(29.41%)

3patients (12.5%)

0.241

Depression 1patient (5.88%)

0patient(0%) 0.235

Anti-P 5patients

(29.41%)

3patients (12.5%)

0.589

ANA 17patients

(100%)

18patients (75%)

0.033a

Anti-DNA 10patients (58.82%)

16patients (66.66%)

0.745

Anti-Smith 7patients (41.17%)

7patients (29.17%)

0.430

Anticardiolipin 6patients (35.29%) 5patients (20.83%) 0.476 Lupus antico-agulant 6patients (35.29%) 13patients (54.16%) 0.342

a p<0.05.

forcognitiveimpairmentandacademicnotes.Twenty-three (56.09%)patientswereelementaryeducationlevelstudents, three(7.31%)hadcompletedelementaryschoolanddidnot continuetheirstudies,and15(36.58%)werehighschool stu-dents.Themeanageofonsetofthediseasewas12.58±3.24 years;andthediseaseduration,untilthetimeoftesting,was 2.4±2.63years.Eleven(26.82%)patientshadactivediseaseat thetimeoftesting(meanofSLEDAI,7.27±2.62).

Thecontrolgroupwascomposedof71healthyvolunteers (90.14%women)withmeanageof16.37±5.21years.No sta-tisticallysignificantdifferenceswerefoundbetweenpatients and controlsregardinggenderand age,and socioeconomic status. According to the criteria adopted forthe definition ofcognitivedysfunction,17(41.46%)patientsand26(36.6%) controlshadcognitiveimpairment(p=0.08).

JSLEpatientsweredivided intotwosubgroupsaccording tothe presenceor absenceofcognitivedysfunction.Itwas observedthatthepresenceofcognitiveimpairmentwas asso-ciatedwithyoungerageatdiagnosisofJSLE(p=0.038)andan associationbetweencognitiveimpairmentandANA(p=0.033) wasnoted.Demographic,clinicalandimmunologicaldataare listedinTable1.

(4)

Table2–Schoolgradesbetweenpatientswithjuvenile systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithout cognitiveimpairment.

Discipline Patientswith cognitive dysfunction (mean±SD)

Patients without cognitive dysfunction (mean±SD)

p-Value

Portuguese/ English/Spanish

7.09±1.29 6.93±1.08 0.302

Geography/History 7.12±1.51 7.38±1.54 0.791 Sciences 6.26±1.52 7.04±1.98 0.195 Physical

Education

7.55±1.67 8.04±1.92 0.604

Mathematics 6.68±2.06 7.37±1.65 0.039a

Arts 8.14±1.59 8.26±0.98 0.662

Sociology/Philosophy 7.62±1.05 7.14±1.27 0.504

a p<0.05.

ofcognitiveimpairment(p=0.988).Symptomsofdepression wereobserved in1(2.43%)patient andagain therewasno associationwithcognitiveimpairment(p=1.0).Noassociation wasobservedbetweensymptomsofanxietyanddepression, whencomparedwithacademicgrades.

Noassociationofcognitiveimpairmentwithany medica-tion(corticosteroids,p=0.988;immunosuppressants,p=0.75 andantimalarials,p=0.988)wasobserved.

Whencomparingpatientswithversuswithoutcognitive impairment,school performanceshowed significant differ-encebetweengroupsonlyformathgrades(p=0.039)(Table2).

Discussion

Inour sample,the frequency ofcognitive dysfunctionwas 41.46%;thisfindingwasconsistentwithotherstudiesreported intheliterature.4,6,8,24

Thepresenceofcognitiveimpairmentwasassociatedwith poorerperformanceinmathematicsinourpatients.Another study found that children with JSLE had poorer academic results versus individuals without this disease.9 It is

sug-gested thatdeficits in language abilityare amongthe first markers of presence of neurological disorder in patients with JSLE,and that this difficulty may be present even in patients without neuropsychiatric manifestations.6 In this

study,therewasnosignificantdifferenceinlanguage-related disciplines.

Itis a very difficult taskto define school performance, in the face of the multiple variables used to assess this phenomenon.25 Unsatisfactoryperformancewasdefinedby

McCallastheperformanceofanindividualwhodoesnot nec-essarilyobtainlowgrades,butwhosegradesarebelowhis/her expectations.26Thereisgreaterconsensusinconsideringas

unsatisfactory a performance substantially below expecta-tionsforthestudent’sowncognitiveability.25,26

Itisalsodifficulttoassessschoolperformance,sincethis parameter dependson differentfactors, amongwhich are: schoolphysicalcharacteristics,teacherqualifications, educa-tionlevelofparents,andeducationlevelofthestudent.28In

theliterature,severalmeasuresareavailableforevaluationof

schoolperformance,including:graderepetition,suspension, gradeslowerthantheexpectedforthestudent’scoefficientof intelligence,andlowgrades.37Inourstudy,inthedefinition

ofpoorschoolperformanceweconsideredtheoccurrenceof unsatisfactorynotes,i.e.educationalachievement<70%fora certainclasscontent.25–28

Itisknownthatcognitivedysfunctionisassociatedwith high morbidity in patients withJSLE.5,12 However,a major

obstacletounderstandingtheneuropsychological function-ingofthesepatientsisthelackofastandardizedcriterionfor theidentificationofthisdysfunction.8,24

The cognitive impairment evaluation consisted oftools adaptedtojuvenileagegroupandselectedfromthebattery suggestedbyACR16 forevaluationofcognitive dysfunction

inadults,and alsowithbatteriesusedinrecent studiesin patientswithJSLE.4,6,8,9,24

Inthisstudy,wefoundnoevidencethatdiseaseactivity playsaroleincognitive function.Thisfindingissupported by two recently published pediatric studies, in which the authors foundno association betweendisease activity and cognitivedysfunction.4,8Ontheotherhand,whenindividuals

withmoresevereconditions,e.g.,hospitalizedpatients,were included, wecouldobserveanassociation betweendisease activityandcognitivedysfunction.12

Other authors found no association between cognitive deficitandcumulativedamage38ormedication,39whichwas

confirmedinourstudy.

Inchildren,reportsofanassociationofautoantibodieswith cognitiveimpairmentaresparseandinconclusive;moreover, such studies alsodid notidentify intheir sample adirect associationbetweenthepresenceofantibodiesandcognitive dysfunction.4,8However,inourstudywefoundanassociation

withANAandcognitiveimpairment,suggestingthatthereis alinkbetweenautoimmunityandcognitivefunctioning.

Itisknownthatlivingwithachronicdiseasecancause majoradaptiveproblemsassociatedwithemotionaldistress, suchasirritability,insomnia,lossofappetite,emotional insta-bility,andchangesinmemoryandconcentration,whichmay be reflected in school performance.27,28,40 For this reason,

someauthorspointout behaviordifficultiesasariskfactor forpooracademicperformanceofindividualswithJSLE.8,11,41

Behaviordifficulties,althoughbeingavariablenotevaluated inthisstudy,areimportantinpatientswithchronicdisease, especiallyinadolescents;thesefactorsmayhavehadsome bearingontheresults.

Althoughcognitivedisorderfrequencyhasbeencompared againsthealthyindividuals,unfortunatelywedidnotcompute theacademicperformanceofthesecontrolsforcomparison.

Inconclusion,patientssufferingfromJSLEandwith cog-nitiveimpairmentexhibitaworseacademicperformancein math, comparedtoJSLE patientswithout cognitive impair-ment.

Funding

(5)

2009-4 and 471343/2011-0 and 302205/2012-8; and CNPq 473328/2013-5,466715/2014-5).

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1. PapadimitrakiED,IsenbergDA.Childhood-andadult-onset lupus:anupdateofsimilaritiesanddifferences.ExpertRev ClinImmunol.2009;5:391–403.

2. MinaR,BrunnerHI.Pediatriclupus–aretheredifferencesin presentation,genetics,responsetotherapy,anddamage accrualcomparedwithadultlupus?RheumDisClinNorth Am.2010;36:53–80.

3. vonSchevenE,BakkalogluA.What’snewinpediatricSLE. BestPractResClinRheumatol.2009;23:699–708.

4. MuscalE,BreyRL.Neurologicmanifestationsofsystemic lupuserythematosusinchildrenandadult.NeurolClin. 2010;28:61–73.

5. BenselerSM,SilvermanED.Neuropsychiatricinvolvementin pediatricsystemiclupuserythematosus.Lupus.

2007;16:564–71.

6. DiFrancescoMW,HollandSK,RisMD,AdlerCM,NelsonS, DelbelloMP,etal.Functionalmagneticresonanceimagining assessmentofcognitivefunctioninchildhood-onset systemiclupuserytrhematosus:apilotstudy.Arthritis Rheum.2007;56:4151–63.

7. LevyDM,ArdoinSF,SchanbergLE.Neurocognitive

impairmentinchildrenanadolescentswithsystemiclupus erythematosus.NatClinPractRheumatol.2009;5:106–14.

8. WilliamsTS,AranowC,RossGS,BarsdorfA,ImundoLF, EichenfieldAH,etal.Neurocognitiveimpairmentin childhood-onsetsystemiclupuserythematosus: measurementissuesindiagnosis.ArthritisCareRes (Hoboken).2011;63:1178–87.

9. ZelkoF,BeebeD,BakerA,NelsonSM,AliA,CedenoA,etal. Academicoutcomesinchildhood-onsetsystemiclupus erythematosus.ArthritisCareRes(Hoboken).2012;64:1167–74.

10.MoorthyLN,PetersonMG,HassettA,BaratelliM,LehmanTJ. Impactoflupusonschoolattendanceandperformance. Lupus.2010;19:620–7.

11.WyckoffPM,MillerLC,TuckerLB,SchallerJG.

Neuropsychologicalassessmentofchildrenandadolescents withsystemiclupuserythematosus.Lupus.1995;4:217–20.

12.SibbittWLJr,BrandtJR,JohnsonCR,MaldonadoME,PatelSR, FordCC,etal.Theincidenceandprevalenceof

neuropsychiatricsyndromesinpediatriconsetsystemic lupuserythematosus.JRheumatol.2002;29:1536–42.

13.TanEM,CohenAS,FriesJF,MasiAT,McShaneDJ,RothfieldNF, etal.The1982revisedcriteriafortheclassificationof systemiclupuserythematosus.ArthritisRheum. 1982;25:1271–7.

14.HochbergMC.UpdatingtheAmericanCollegeof Rheumatologyrevisedcriteriafortheclassificationof systemiclupuserythematosus.ArthritisRheum. 1997;40:1725.

15.SilvaCA,AvcinT,BrunnerHI.Taxonomyforsystemiclupus erythematosuswithonsetbeforeadulthood.ArthritisCare Res(Hoboken).2012;64:1787–93.

16.ACRAdHocCommitteeofNeuropsychiatricLupus Nomenclature.TheAmericanCollegeofRheumatology nomenclatureandcasedefinitionsforneuropsychiatriclupus syndromes.ArthritisRheum.1999;42:599–608.

17.FigueiredoVLM.WISC-III.EscaladeInteligênciaWechsler paracrianc¸as:manual/DavidWechsler.3ed:Adaptac¸ãoe Padronizac¸ãodeumaamostrabrasileira.1ed.SãoPaulo: CasadoPsicólogo;2002.

18.NascimentoE.WAIS-III.EscaladeInteligênciaWechslerpara adultos:manual/DavidWechsler:Adaptac¸ãoepadronizac¸ão deumaamostrabrasileira.1ed.SãoPaulo:CasadoPsicólogo; 2004.

19.OliveiraM.FigurascomplexasdeRey–Testedecópiae reproduc¸ãodememóriadefigurasgeométricascomplexas: adaptac¸ãobrasileira.SãoPaulo:CasadoPsicólogo;1999.

20.MorrisJC,HeymanA,MohsRC,TheConsortiumtoEstablisha RegistryforAlzheimer’sDisease(Cerad).PartI–Clinicaland neuropsychologicalassessmentofAlzheimer’sdisease. Neurology.1989;39:1159–65.

21.SpreenO,StraussE.Acompendiumofneuropsychological test:administration,norms,andcommentary.2nded.New York:OxfordUniversityPress;1998.

22.LezakMD,HowiesonDB,LoringDW.Neuropsychological assessment.4thed.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress;2004.

23.TrenerryMR,CrossonB,DeBoeJ,LeberWR.Stroop

neuropsychologicalscreeningtestpsychologicalassessment. Odessa:PsychologicalAssessmentResources;1989.

24.BrunnerHI,RuthNM,GermanA,NelsonS,PassoMH, Roebuck-SpencerT,etal.Initialvalidationofthepediatric AutomatedNeuropsychologicalAssessmentMetricsfor childhoodonsetsystemiclupuserythematosus.Arthritis Rheum.2007;57:1174–82.

25.HinshawSP.Academicunderachievement,attentiondeficits, andaggression:comorbidityandimplicationsfor

intervention.JConsultClinPsychol.1992;60:893–903.

26.McCallRB.Academicunderachievers.CurrDirPsycholSci. 1994;3:15–9.

27.DaviesSM,RutledgeCM,DaviesTC.Theimpactofstudent learningstylesoninterviewingskillsandacademic performance.TeachLearnMed.1997;9:121–35.

28.AraújoA.Avaliac¸ãoemanejodacrianc¸acomdificuldade escolaredistúrbiodeatenc¸ão.JPediatr.2002;78:S104–10.

29.YeeC,FarewellVT,GrifftithsB,TehL,BruceLN,AhmadY, etal.TheuseofSystemicLupusErythematosusDisease ActivityIndex-2000todefineactivediseaseandminimal clinicallymeaningfulchangebasedondatafromalarge cohortofsystemiclupuserythematosuspatients. Rheumatology(Oxford).2011;50:982–8.

30.GladmanDD,UrowitzMB,GoldsmithCH,FortinP,GinzlerE, GordonC,etal.ThereliabilityoftheSystemicLupus InternationalCollaborationgClinics/AmericanCollegeof RheumatologyDamageIndexinpatientswithsystemiclupus erythematosus.ArthritisRheum.1997;40:809–13.

31.KovacsM.Children’sDepressionInventoryCDI:manual. Multi-HealthSystems:NewYork;1992.

32.CruvinelM,BoruchovitchE,SantosAAA.Inventáriode DepressãoInfantil(CDI):análisedosparâmetros psicométricos,20.Fractal:RevistadePsicologia;2008.p. 473–90.

33.BeckAT,SteerRA.BeckAnxietyInventory:manual.San Antonio:PsychologicalCorporation;1993.

34.CunhaJA.ManualdaversãoemportuguêsdasEscalasBeck. SãoPaulo:CasadoPsicólogo;2001.

35.HarrisEN,GharaviAE,PatelSP,HughesGR.Evaluationofthe anti-cardiolipinantibodytest:reportofaninternational workshopheld4April1986.ClinExpImmunol. 1987;68:215–22.

(6)

37.PasturaGMC,MattosP,AraújoAPQC.Desempenhoescolara transtornododéficitdeatenc¸ãoehiperatividade.Revistade PsiquiatriaClínica.2003;32:324.

38.MikdashiJ,HandwergerB.Predictorsofneuropsychiatric damageinsystemiclupuserythematosus:datafromthe Marylandlupuscohort.Rheumatology.2004;43:1555–60.

39.KozoraE,ThompsonLL,WestSG,KotzinBL.Analysisof cognitiveandpsychologicaldeficitsinsystemiclupus

erythematosuspatientswithoutovertcentralnervoussystem disease.ArthritisRheum.1996;39:2035–45.

40.IversonGL.Theneedforpsychologicalservicesforpersons withsystemiclupuserythematosus.Psychology.

1995;40:39–49.

Imagem

Table 1 – Demographic, clinical and immunological data of juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus patients with and without cognitive impairment.
Table 2 – School grades between patients with juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus with and without cognitive impairment.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Patients were described by demographic data, time of diagnosis of disease, activities of the disease Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLEDAI)] 19 , organ

2 – Pearson correlation of circulating Treg cells (A) and CD3–CD19+ B cells (B) with lupus activity assessed by the systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index

Differences in autoantibody profiles and disease activity and damage scores between childhood and adult-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis. Semin

O uso de suplementação nutricional comercial em cachaços com reduzida produção de doses de sêmen incrementou o volume do ejaculado, e a concentração e motilidade

Quality of life was evaluated by the Kidney Disease and Quality of Life Short- Form, pain by the Brief Pain Inventory, emotional factors by Beck anxiety and depression scales

used the criteria of SLEDAI (Systemic Lupus Erythema- tosus Disease Activity Index) 22.. All patients studied

Cumulative damage of the disease was evaluated by use of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index for systemic lupus

Todos os pacientes foram classificados como ativo ou inativo, de acordo com o índice de atividade da doença pelo Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index - SLEDAI 14