• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. bras. farmacogn. vol.26 número6

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. bras. farmacogn. vol.26 número6"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texto

(1)

w ww . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / b j p

Original

article

Morpho-anatomical

study

of

Ageratum

conyzoides

Rafaela

F.

Santos,

Bárbara

M.

Nunes,

Rafaela

D.

Sá,

Luiz

A.L.

Soares,

Karina

P.

Randau

LaboratóriodeFarmacognosia,DepartamentodeCiênciasFarmacêuticas,UniversidadeFederaldePernambuco,Recife,PE,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received27April2016 Accepted27July2016 Availableonline16August2016

Keywords: Ageratumconyzoides

Anatomy Asteraceae Mentrasto Microscopy Morphology

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

AgeratumconyzoidesL.,belongingtothefamilyAsteraceae,isatropicalplantfoundinsomeregionsof Africa,AsiaandSouthAmerica.Thisspeciesispopularlyknownasbillygoatweed,“mentrasto”and “catinga-de-bode”andhasalargevarietyofsecondarymetabolitesandbiologicalactivitiesmentioned intheliterature.Theobjectiveofthisworkwastocontributethepharmacobotanicalstandardization ofA.conyzoides.Cross-sectionswereobtained,byhand,formicroscopiccharacterizationofroot,stem, petioleandleafblade;totheleafbladewerestillmadeparadermalandlongitudinalsections,scanning electronmicroscopyanalysisandmaceration.Theanalysisshowedthatsecretorystructuresductsare evidencedonlyinthepetioleandtheleafblade.Theroothasparenchymatousmedullarregion;stem, petioleandleafbladeexhibitstriatedcuticle.Non-glandulartrichomesarepresentinstem,petioleand leafblade,whilecapitateglandulartrichomesarepresentonlyintheleafbladeandarerestrictedtothe abaxialface.Theseanatomicalfeaturesareusefulfordiagnosisofthespeciesandprovidesupporttotheir qualitycontrol.

©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeFarmacognosia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisisanopen accessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Introduction

Asteraceaeisavastplantfamilythatcomprisesroughly1500 generaand25,000speciesindifferenthabitats(SouzaandLorenzi, 2012). This family consists of vegetation quite distinct, which rangesfrom herbs,subshrubs,and shrubs totrees (Joly, 2002). Thisvegetationisfoundintodiversehabitatsonceithasagreat environmentaladaptation(VenableandLevin,1983).

Ageratumis one of thegenera in thefamily Asteraceae and consistsofabout30species(Okunade,2002).Amongthespecies,

AgeratumconyzoidesL., commonly knownas“billy goat weed”, “mentrasto”and“catinga-de-bode”(Cruz,1995;Asicumpon,2005; Matos, 2007), is widelyused in traditional medicine in several countries around the world as a purgative, febrifuge, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, anesthetic and in treatment of ulcers (LorenziandMatos,2002;Okunade,2002;Leitãoetal.,2014).

A.conyzoidesisatropicalplantverycommoninthewestern andeasternregionsoftheAfricancontinent,aswellasinsome regionsofAsiaandSouthAmerica(Bhattetal.,2012;Iwu,2014).It isanannualaromaticweedofcultivatedfields,however,itisalso invasiveofpastures,vacantlotsand evenofforestareas(Sousa etal.,2004;Batishetal.,2006).TheoccupationofA.conyzoidesis

∗ Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:[email protected](K.P.Randau).

easilysucceededbecauseofitswideadaptabilityinthe environ-ment,itssuperiorreproductivepotentialanditsallelopathy(Kong etal.,2004).

Thespecieshasawidevarietyofsecondarymetabolites, includ-ing mono and sesquiterpenes, triterpenes, steroids, flavonoids, coumarins,tanninsandalkaloids(Gonzálezetal.,1991a,1991b; Kasaliet al.,2002; Moreiraetal., 2007;Nouret al.,2010; Bosi et al., 2013).Someof these metabolitesare biologicallyactive, as themethoxyflavone isolatedof thehexane extract of leaves of A. conyzoides,which had insecticidalactivity (Moreira etal., 2007).Additional properties reported to the plant extractsare antibacterialactivities(Adetutuetal.,2012;Odeleyeetal.,2014), antifungal(Moraisetal.,2014),antiparasitic(Teixeiraetal.,2014), anti-inflammatory(Mouraetal.,2005),healing(Arulprakashetal., 2012)andcytotoxicityproperties(Adetutuetal.,2012).

Theessentialoiloftheleavesoraerialpartsoftheplanthas beenwidelyinvestigatedforitscompositionandbiological activ-ities.Themajorconstituentsgenerallyfoundarethechromenes, precoceneIandprecoceneII,andthesesquiterpenescaryophyllene andgermacrene-D(Okunade,2002).Themainactivitydescribed intheliteraturefortheessentialoilistheinsecticide(Limaetal., 2010;LiuandLiu,2014),butalsopresentsallelopathic(Kongetal., 2004)andantifungalactivities(Nogueiraetal.,2010;Patiletal., 2010).

Despitethewide rangeof pertinentstudiesonthechemical compositionandactivitiesofA.conyzoides,therearefewstudies http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2016.07.002

(2)

Materialsandmethods

Plantmaterial

Several specimens of adult plants of Ageratum conyzoides

L., Asteraceae, were collected in the city of Camocim de São Félix,Pernambuco,Brazil.Avoucherspecimenwaspreparedand depositedintheHerbariumDárdanodeAndradeLimaofthe Insti-tutoAgronômicodePernambuco(IPA),undercollectionnumber 89312.

Morpho-anatomicalcharacterization

Severalcross-sectionsweremadeatthemiddleregionofthe root, stem, petiole and leaf blade from the fresh material, by hand,usingacommonrazorbladeandpetiolemarrowfromthe

Cecropia sp. as a supportmaterial (Oliveira and Akisue, 2009). Thecross-sectionsweresubjectedtodecolorizationwithsodium hypochloritesolution (50%)(Krausand Arduin, 1997), followed bywashingwithdistilledwaterand,lastly,stainedaccordingto thetechnique described by Bukatsch (1972) withsafranin and astrablue.Paradermalandlongitudinalsectionsoftheleafblade werealsoperformed,usingtheaforementionedprocedures,butthe paradermalsectionswerestainedwithmethyleneblue(Krauter, 1985).

Posteriorly,semipermanenthistologicalslideswereprepared containingthesectionsofbotanicalmaterial,followingcommon plantanatomyprocedures(Johansen,1940;Sass,1951).The macro-scopicdescriptionfollowedthemethodologyofOliveiraandAkisue (2009).

Scanningelectronmicroscopy(SEM)

Analyseswereperformedinsamplesoffreshleafblades.The sampleswerefixedin2.5%glutaraldehyde(buffered with0.1M sodium cacodylate). After that, the material was subjected to post-fixationusing2%osmiumtetroxidesolution(bufferedwith 0.1Msodiumcacodylate)anddehydrationinethanolseries. Subse-quently,thematerialwassubmittedtocriticalpointdrying(Bal-Tec CPD030)andmountedontoSEMstubs,usingdouble-sided adhe-sivetapeandsputter-coatedwithgold(LeicaEMSCD500)(Haddad etal.,1998).Finally,thesampleswereexaminedwithascanning electronmicroscope(Quanta200FEG)intheCentrodeTecnologias EstratégicasdoNordeste.

Maceration

Themaceration wasperformedusing fresh leafblades frag-mentsthatweredisintegratedwiththemixtureof10%nitricacid and10% chromicacid(1:1),accordingtothemethodof Jeffrey (Johansen,1940).

Analysisofhistologicalslides

Theanalysisofthesemipermanenthistologicalslidesprepared foranatomicalcharacterizationandmacerationwereconductedon imagesinsoftware(ToupViewImage),obtainedbydigitalcamera coupledtoalightmicroscope(Alltion).

orationyellowishtobrownandweaklyfixedtothesoil(Fig.1B). Thestemisgreenintheyoungplantbutitmaypresentbrown colorin olderplants. Moreover,thestem is classifiedasaerial, hascylindricalshape andiscovered bytrichomes(Fig.1E).The leavesaresimple,opposite,ovalshape,acutetip,attenuatedbase andtoothedmargin,coveredwithwhitishtrichomes.Thepetiole isstraight(Fig.1C)andhasconcave-convexcontour.Theterminal inflorescencesbearsaboutfifteenpurpleflower-head(Fig.1D).

Microscopicaspects Root

TherootofA.conyzoides,incross-section,hascylindrical con-tour,presentingsuberandsomelenticels(Fig.2A).Intherootof

Ageratumfastigiatum (Gardn.)R.M. Kinget H. Rob., Del-Vechio-Vieira et al. (2008) evidenced a desquamation process of the peridermis,withconsequenteliminationofsomecorticallayers and the epidermis. The cortical parenchyma consists of about five layersof cells, withstraight or slightly sinuous walls. It is also observed in this region the presence of inter-cellular air spaces (aerenchyma) (Fig. 2A) and cellular inclusions (Fig. 2B). Aerenchymawasalsovisualizedinthecorticalregionoftheroot of Ageratum houstonianum Mill.,but not in A. fastigiatum ( Del-Vechio-Vieiraetal.,2008;DasandMukherjee,2013),whichcan beausefulfeatureinthedifferentiationofthesespecies.Alsoin relationtothecorticalregion,inthespeciesA.houstonianumwere foundsecretoryductsandinA.fastigiatumwerefoundsecretory canals(Del-Vechio-Vieiraetal.,2008;DasandMukherjee,2013). Inthespeciesstudiedinthisworkwerenotfoundsecretory struc-turesintheroot,whichis,therefore,anotherimportantdiagnostic feature.

TheendodermisisuniseriateandhasCasparianstrips(Fig.2A andB).Thevascularsystemisformedbyxylem,whichoccupies most of the root (Fig. 2A and C), and by phloem,arranged in fewlayers,surroundingthexylem(Fig.2A).InA.fastigiatumthe secondaryphloemisdistributed ingroupsof cellsseparatedby parenchymaticrays(Del-Vechio-Vieiraetal.,2008).ThepithofA. conyzoidesiscomposedofparenchymaticcellswithstraightwalls (Fig.2C).A.houstonianumalsohasparenchymaticmedullarregion (Dasand Mukherjee,2013), differingfromA. fastigiatum,whose centralregionofrootisalloccupiedbyxylem(Del-Vechio-Vieira etal.,2008).OthermembersofAsteraceae,suchasBidenspilosa

andPlucheasagittalis,alsoexhibitparenchymaticmedullarregion (Colaresetal.,2014).

Stem

Incross-section,thestemhascylindricalcontour.The epider-misisuniseriate,coatedwithathinandstriatedlayerofcuticle (Fig.3AandB).Thepresenceofstriationsinthecuticleofstem isalsoreportedinA.fastigiatumandinothergeneraofthefamily Asteraceae,suchasBaccharisandElephantopus(BudelandDuarte, 2008;Del-Vechio-Vieiraetal.,2008;EmpinottiandDuarte,2008). Itisalsoobservedthepresenceofnon-glandulartrichomes,which aremulticellularanduniseriate(Fig.3AandC).

(3)

A

D

C

B

ro

le

ste

flo

ad

ab

le

E

Fig.1.AgeratumconyzoidesL.,Asteraceae.(A)Plantinitshabitat;(B)root(ro)offasciculatetype;(C)Singleleaves(le),abaxial(ab)andadaxial(ad)faces;(D)detailof flower-head(flo),whicharepurple;(E)Stem(ste)andleaves(le)inoppositeposition.Bars:B,C,andD=2cm;E=5cm.

H. Rob. hasboth, glandular and non-glandular trichomes( Del-Vechio-Vieira et al.,2008), as well as Acanthospermumaustrale

(Loefl.)Kuntze,Achyroclinealata(Kunth)DC.,Ayapanatriplinervis

(Vahl)R.M.King&H.Rob.,BaccharisrufescensSpreng.var.tenuifolia

(DC.)Baker,B.uncinellaDC.,CaleaunifloraLess.,Elephantopusmollis

KunthandGymnanthemumamygdalinum(Delile)Sch.Bip.exWalp. (Budeletal.,2006;Martinsetal.,2006;Mussuryetal.,2007;Budel andDuarte,2008;EmpinottiandDuarte,2008;DuarteandSilva, 2013;Souzaetal.,2013;Neryetal.,2014).

Thecorticalregionis formedbytwotofourlayers of angu-larcollenchymaandforaboutfivelayersofparenchymaticcells (Fig.3AandB).Therearecellularinclusionsinthisregion(Fig.3D). Thetypeofcollenchymacanbeusedtodistinguishthestemsof

AgeratumconyzoidesandA.fastigiatum,becauseinthelatterthe col-lenchymavariesbetweenangularandlamellar(Del-Vechio-Vieira etal.,2008).Differentfromwhatwasobservedinthecorticalregion oftherootofA.conyzoides,inthestemthereisnoaerenchymain thisregion(Fig.3A).

cp

ph

end

len

su

in

end

xy

A

B

C

pa

xy

(4)

pa

cp

co

cp

ep

co

A

B

C

F

E

D

in

sg

in

ngt

Fig.3.AgeratumconyzoidesL.(Asteraceae),cross-sectionsofthestem.(A)Generalview,showingepidermis(ep)withnon-glandulartrichome(ngt),corticalregionformed bycollenchyma(co)andparenchyma(cp),endodermis(end),sclerenchymafibers(scl),phloem(ph),xylem(xy)andmedullarregioncomposedofparenchyma(pa);(B) epidermis(ep)coatedwiththinandstriatedcuticle(ct)andthecorticalregionformedbyangularcollenchyma(co)andcorticalparenchyma(cp);(C)non-glandulartrichomes (ngt);(D)cellularinclusion(in)incorticalregion;(E)starchgrains(sg)intheendodermis;(F)cellularinclusion(in)inmedullarregion.Bars:A=200␮m;B,D,EandF=50␮m; C=500␮m.

Starch grains are visualized in the endodermis (Fig. 3E). In thefamilyAsteraceae,theendodermisiswelldefinedanditmay presentCasparianstripsoroccurasstarchsheath(Metcalfeand Chalk,1950).InA.fastigiatumtherearesecretorycanalsnearthe endodermis, which was not evidenced in A. conyzoides and A. houstonianum(Del-Vechio-Vieiraetal.,2008;DasandMukherjee, 2013). The vascular system is collateral, consisting of several continuous bundles, distributed in a single ring. Isolated scle-renchyma fibers are located externallyto the phloem,forming caps(Fig.3A).The medullarregionconsistsofparenchyma and inclusionsarefoundinsomecells(Fig.3AandF).Thepithcells ofA.fastigiatummayhavelignification(Del-Vechio-Vieiraetal., 2008).

Petiole

Incross-section, thepetiolehasconcave-convex shape,with tworibsonadaxialface(Fig.4A).Thesameformatiscommonin otherspeciesofAgeratum(Del-Vechio-Vieiraetal.,2008;Dasand Mukherjee,2013).Theepidermisiscomposedofasinglelayerof cellsandcoveredwithathinandstriatedcuticle(Fig.4AandB).The sametypeofnon-glandulartrichomefoundonstemalsoappears inthepetiole(Fig.4A)and,furthermore,somestomataareinserted intheepidermis(Fig.4B).Theangularcollenchymaisalmost con-tinuous,encirclingtheentireparenchymaticinternalregionofthe petiole,composedbyonetotwolayersofcells(Fig.4A).However, intheadaxialribsareobservedmorelayersofthistissue(Fig.4A). InA.fastigiatumpredominatetheangularandlacunartypesof col-lenchymaanditmayappearinterruptedbylacunaryparenchyma, inwhicharelocatedlargespacesoflysigenousorigin( Del-Vechio-Vieiraetal.,2008).

Thevascularsystemisconstitutedbythreetofivedefined cen-tralbundlesarrangedinanopenarch,withribtraces(Fig.4A). Thebundlesarebicollateral(Fig.4C),whileinA.houstonianumand

A.fastigiatumthebundlesarecollateral(Del-Vechio-Vieiraetal., 2008;DasandMukherjee,2013).OtherspeciesofAsteraceaethat havebicollateralvascularbundlesinthepetioleareAspiliaafricana

(Pers)C.DAdams,Tithoniadiversifolia(Hemsl)A.GrayandVernonia amygdalinaDel.(Mabeletal.,2013).Secretoryductsarefoundclose tothevascularbundles(Fig.4C).Thesestructuresarecommonin Asteraceae(Castroetal.,1997)andalsohavebeendescribedin petiolesofA.fastigiatum(Gardn.)R.M.KingetH.Rob.,Flourensia campestrisGriseb.,F.oolepisS.F.BlakeandSiegesbeckiaorientalisL. (Aguileraetal.,2004;Delbónetal.,2007;Del-Vechio-Vieiraetal., 2008).Inthecellsoftheparenchymaandinsomecellsofthe col-lenchymainclusionscanbefound, mainlyintheregionswhere thesetissuesarejoined(Fig.4D).

Leafblade

The leaf blade of A. conyzoides, in surface view, shows epi-dermalcells withsinuous walls on both sides (Fig. 5A and B). Theleafbladeisamphistomatic,withanomocyticandanisocytic stomata,beingthefirstsmorefrequent(Fig.5Aand5B).Metcalfe and Chalk (1950)reported that for Asteraceae thestomata are usuallyanomocytic.However,datafromtheliteraturearequite differentwithrespecttothetypesofstomatapresentintheleaf bladeofA.conyzoides.Insomestudieswerefoundonlystomata anomocytic(Ferreiraetal.,2002;Unambaetal.,2008;Folorunso andAwosode,2013).Rahmanetal.(2013)foundthesametypes identifiedinthisworkandAdedejiandJewoola(2008)saidthat theplanthaslargelyanisocyticandoccasionallyanomocyticand brachyparacytic.

Non-glandulartrichomes,whicharethesametypedescribedin stemandpetiole,arevisualizedonbothfacesandcapitate glandu-lartrichomesarerestrictedtoabaxialface(Fig.5CandD).Regarding thetypesoftrichomes,itisalsoobserveddivergenceinthe liter-ature.Ferreiraetal.(2002),investigatingtheplantalsocollected inBrazil,reportedthepresenceofnon-glandularandglandular tri-chomes,but,differentfromthatfoundinthisstudy,theauthors statedthattheglandulartrichomesarelocatedonboth facesof theleafblade.InastudyoftheleafbladeanatomyofA.conyzoides

(5)

A

co

ngt

vb

ct

ep

st

in

sd

vb

gp

co

ep

B

D

C

Fig.4.AgeratumconyzoidesL.(Asteraceae),cross-sectionsofthepetiole.(A)Generalaspect,showingepidermis(ep),non-glandulartrichomes(ngt),collenchyma(co),ground parenchyma(gp)andvascularbundles(vb);(B)detailofepidermis(ep)coatedwiththinandstriatedcuticle(ct)andstomata(st);(C)detailofbicollateralvascularbundles (vb)andsecretoryduct(sd);(D)cellularinclusion(in)inparenchymaandcollenchyma.Bars:A=500␮m;BandD=50␮m;C=200␮m.

st

ep

st

ep

ngt

gt

A

B

D

C

(6)

ngt

ep

ct

st

ct

st

gt

ngt

A

B

C

F

E

D

Fig.6. AgeratumconyzoidesL.(Asteraceae),SEMoftheleafblade.(A)Viewoftheadaxialfaceshowingnon-glandulartrichomes(ngt);(B)epidermalcells(ep)andstriated cuticle(ct)ontheadaxialface;(C)epidermalcells(ep)andstomata(st)ontheadaxialface;(D)viewoftheabaxialfaceshowingnon-glandulartrichome(ngt);(E)capitate glandulartrichome(gt)ontheabaxialface;(F)stomata(st)andstriatedcuticle(ct)ontheabaxialface.Bars:A=500␮m;BandC=50␮m;D=400␮m;E=100␮m;F=20␮m.

distributionintheleafbladecorrespondedtothosedescribedin thiswork(Millanietal.,2010).

The studies conducted on the species collected in Nigeria and Bangladesh described only the presence of non-glandular

trichomes(Folorunsoand Awosode,2013;Rahman etal.,2013; Mabeletal.,2014).AccordingtoWerker(2000),althoughthe dif-ferentiationoftrichomesisgeneticallycontrolled,theirfrequency isaffectedbybioticandabioticfactors.

vb

ep

ngt

co

ep

ep

pp

sp

in

ep

sd

sd

co

gp

A

B

C

D

E

(7)

A

B

ep

st

vp

gt

ngt

D

C

Fig.8. AgeratumconyzoidesL.(Asteraceae),macerationoftheleafblade.(A)Epidermis(ep)andstomata(st);(B)vesselelementofthehelicaltype(vb);(C)non-glandular trichome(ngt);(D)capitateglandulartrichome(gt).Bars:A,BandD=50␮m;C=200␮m.

IntheleafbladeanalysisinSEMitwasalsonotedthepresence ofthenon-glandulartrichomesonbothfacesandthepresenceof thecapitateglandulartrichomesonlyonabaxialface,asitwas previouslyvisualizedbylightmicroscopy(Fig.6A,DandE).But onlyinSEMitwaspossibleobserved,withmoredetail,thatthe cuticleisstriatedonbothfaces(Fig.6BandF)andthat,onthe adax-ialface,thestomataaresituatedslightlybelowofepidermalcells (Fig.6C),whileontheabaxialfacetheyaresituatedonthesame levelorslightlyaboveofepidermalcells(Fig.6EandF).Regarding thepresenceofstriatedcuticleontheleafbladeofA.conyzoides, twootherstudiesaffirmedthatthecuticleisnon-striated(Adedeji andJewoola,2008;Mabeletal.,2014);however,itispossiblethat thisdivergenceisduetothefactthat,intheseworks,werenot per-formedtheanalysisinSEM,whichhasahigherresolutiononthe observationofmicrostructuralfeatures(Haddadetal.,1998).

Incross-section,A. conyzoidesshows amidribwithbiconvex contour(Fig.7A).A.fastigiatumexhibitsmidribrangingfrom plane-convextoslightly biconvex(Del-Vechio-Vieiraetal.,2008).The epidermisisuniseriate(Fig.7AandB)anditisalsoobserved non-glandulartrichomesthroughoutthemidrib(Fig.7B).Adjacentthe epidermisislocatedtheangularcollenchyma,composedofoneto twolayersontheabaxialfaceofthemidrib(Fig.7A)anduptofour layersofcellsinitsadaxialface(Fig.7B).

InA.fastigiatumthechlorophyllparenchymainvadestheregion ofthemidribuntilcloseofthevascularbundle,whichdoesnot happeninA.conyzoides(Del-Vechio-Vieiraetal.,2008).Inthe cen-tralregionofthemidribofA.conyzoidescanbefoundonetothree collateralvascularbundles,arrangedinanopenarch(Fig.7A).In theliterature,thereisdescriptionofonlyonevascularbundlein themidribofA.conyzoides(Millanietal.,2010;Mabeletal.,2014; EkekeandMensah,2015).Secretoryductsarefoundnexttothe bundles(Fig.7CandD),whichcorroboratesthestudyofMillani etal.(2010).However,Mabeletal.(2014)andEkekeandMensah

(2015)didnotreportthepresenceofsecretorystructuresinthe midriboftheplant.

The mesophyll is dorsiventral, with one layer of palisade parenchymaandthreetofourlayersofdensespongyparenchyma (Fig.7E).InAgeratumfastigiatumthechlorophyllparenchymais pli-cated(Del-Vechio-Vieiraetal.,2008).Cellularinclusionsarefound throughoutthemesophyll(Fig.7E).

TheleafbladeofA.conyzoides,aftermacerated,presents epi-dermal cells and stomata (Fig.8A),as well as vessel elements ofthehelicaltype(Fig.8B).Thetwo typesoftrichomesviewed in cross-section and paradermal sections are alsofound in the maceratedleafblade(Fig.8CandD),andtheycouldbeintactor fragmented,especiallythenon-glandulartrichome(Fig.8C).The macerationdataisusefulwhenitisnotpossibletoanalyzetheplant material through histological sections (Farmacopeia Brasileira, 2010).

Conclusion

Thiswork hascontributed toexpand theinformation about

Ageratum conyzoides, utilizing usual techniques of microscopic analysisofplants.Itwasshownthattheroot,stem,petioleandleaf bladeofA.conyzoidespresentanatomicalcharacteristicsthatare usefulintheidentificationanddifferentiationfromotherspeciesof thisgenusandarealsoessentialparametersforthequalitycontrol ofvegetablerawmaterial.

Authors’contributions

(8)

Conflictsofinterest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

Acknowledgments

TheauthorsaregratefultoCNPqforfinancialsupportinthe formoffellowshipawardsandtoFACEPEforfinancialsupportin theformofgrants.

References

Adedeji,O.,Jewoola,O.A.,2008.Importanceofleafepidermalcharactersinthe Asteraceaefamily.Not.Bot.HortiAgrobot.Cluj36,7–16.

Adetutu,A.,Morgan,W.A.,Corcoran,O.,Chimezie,F.,2012.Antibacterialactivityand

invitrocytotoxicityofextractsandfractionsofParkiabiglobosa(Jacq.)Benth. stembarkandAgeratumconyzoidesLinn.leaves.Environ.Toxicol.Pharmacol. 34,478–483.

Aguilera,D.B.,Meira,R.M.S.A.,Fereira,F.A.,2004.Anatomyandhistochemistryof thevegetativeorgansofSiegesbeckiaorientalis(Asteraceae).PlantaDaninha22, 483–489.

Amorin,M.,Paula,J.P.,Silva,R.Z.,Farago,P.V.,Budel,J.M.,2014.Pharmacobotanical studyoftheleafandstemofMikanialanuginosaforitsqualitycontrol.Rev.Bras. Farmacogn.24,531–537.

Arulprakash,K.,Murugan,R.,Ponrasu,T.,Iyappan,K.,Gayathri,V.S.,Suguna,L.,2012.

EfficacyofAgeratumconyzoidesontissuerepairandcollagenformationinrats. Clin.Exp.Dermatol.37,418–424.

Asicumpon,2005.TheAssociationforScientificIdentification,Conservationand Uti-lizationofMedicinalPlantsofNigeriaChecklistofMedicinalPlantsofNigeria andtheiruses.Trinity-BizPublishers,Abakpa-Enugu.

Batish,D.R.,Singh,H.P.,Kaur,S.,Kohli,R.K.,2006.PhytotoxicityofAgeratum cony-zoidestowardsgrowthandnodulationofCicerarietinum.Agric.Ecosyst.Environ. 11,399–401.

Bhatt,J.R.,Singh,J.S.,Singh,S.P.,Tripathi,R.S.,Kohli,R.K.,2012.InvasiveAlienPlants: AnEcologicalAppraisalfortheIndianSubcontinent.Cabi,Wallingford,UK.

Bosi,C.F.,Rosa,D.W.,Grougnet,R.,Lemonakis,N.,Halabalaki,M.,Skaltsounis,A.L., Biavatti,M.W.,2013.PyrrolizidinealkaloidsinmedicinalteaofAgeratum cony-zoides.Rev.Bras.Farmacogn.23,425–432.

Budel,J.M.,Duarte,M.R.,Farago,P.V.,Takeda,I.J.M.,2006.Caracteresanatômicosde folhaecauledeCaleaunifloraLess.,Asteraceae.Rev.Bras.Farmacogn.16,53–60.

Budel,J.M.,Duarte,M.R.,2008.EstudofarmacobotânicodefolhaecauledeBaccharis uncinellaDC.,Asteraceae.Lat.Am.J.Pharm.27,740–746.

Bukatsch,F.,1972.BemerkungenzurdoppelfärbungAstrablau-Safranin. Mikrokos-mos61,255.

Castro,M.M.,Leitão-Filho,H.F.,Monteiro,W.R.,1997.Utilizac¸ãodeestruturas secre-torasnaidentificac¸ãodosgênerosdeAsteraceaedeumavegetac¸ãodecerrado. Rev.Bras.Biol.20,163–174.

Colares,M.N.,Hernández,M.P.,Novoa,M.C.,Perrotta,V.G.,Auguet,S.,Arambarri, A.M.,2014.Anatomíacomparadaderaícesmedicinalesdehierbasterrestres rioplatenses(BuenosAires,RepúblicaArgentina).Dominguezia30,5–17.

Cruz,G.L.,1995.DicionáriodasplantasúteisdoBrasil.BertrandBrasil,RiodeJaneiro.

Das,K.S.,Mukherjee,S.K.r.,2013.Comparativemorphological,anatomicaland paly-nologicalobservationinAgeratumconyzoidesandAgeratumhoustonianumofthe familyCompositae.Int.J.Pharm.Res.Bio-Sci.2,48–62.

Delbón,N.,Cosa,M.T.,Dottori,N.,2007.Anatomíadeórganosvegetativosen Flouren-ciacampestrisyF.oolepis(Asteraceae),conespecialreferenciaalasestructuras secretoras.Arnaldoa14,61–70.

Del-Vechio-Vieira,G.,Barbosa,M.V.D.,Lopes,B.C.,Sousa,O.V.,Santiago-Fernandes, L.D.R.,Esteves,R.L.,Kaplan,M.A.C.,2008.Caracterizac¸ãomorfoanatômicade

Ageratumfastigiatum(Asteraceae).Rev.Bras.Farmacogn.18,769–776.

Duarte,M.R.,Siebenrok,M.C.N.,Empinotti,C.B.,2007.Anatomiacomparadade espé-ciesdearnica:Porophyllumruderale(Jacq.)Cass.eChaptalianutans(L.)Pohl.Rev. Ciênc.Farm.BásicaApl.28,193–201.

Duarte,M.R.,Silva,A.R.,2013.Anatomicalcharactersofthemedicinalleafandstem ofGymnanthemumamygdalinum(Delile)Sch.Bip.exWalp,(Asteraceae).Braz.J. Pharm.Sci.49,719–727.

Ekeke,C.,Mensah,S.I.,2015.Comparativeanatomyofmidribanditssignificancein thetaxonomyofthefamilyAsteraceaefromNigeria.J.PlantSci.10,200–205.

Empinotti,C.B.,Duarte,M.R.,2008.Estudoanatômicodefolhaecaulede Elephanto-pusmollisKunth(Asteraceae).Rev.Bras.Farmacogn.18,108–116.

FarmacopeiaBrasileira,2010.AgênciaNacionaldeVigilânciaSanitária,Brasilia,DF, 5thed.

Ferreira,E.A.,Procópio,S.O.,Silva,E.A.M.,Silva,A.A.,Rufino,R.J.N.,2002.Estudos anatômicosdefolhasdeespéciesdeplantasdaninhas.II–Bidenspilosa,Emilia sonchifolia,AgeratumconyzoideseSonchusasper.PlantaDaninha20,327–335.

fromAgeratumconyzoides.Phytochemistry30,1137–1139.

González, A.G., Aguiar, Z.E., Grillo, T.A., Luis, J.G., Rivera, A., Calle,J., 1991b.

MethoxyflavonesfromAgeratumconyzoides.Phytochemistry30,1269–1271.

Haddad,A.,Sessos,A.,Attias,M.,Farina,M.,Nazareth,M.M.,Silveira,M., Benchi-mol,M.,Soares,M.J.,Barth,M.O.,Machado,D.R.,Souto-Padrón,T.,Souza,W., 1998.TécnicasbásicasdemicroscopiaeletrônicaaplicadasàsCiências Biológi-cas.SociedadeBrasileiradeMicroscopiaEletrônica,RiodeJaneiro.

Iwu,M.M.,2014.HandbookofAfricanMedicinalPlants,2nded.CRCPress,NewYork.

Johansen,D.A.,1940.PlantMicrotechnique.McGraw-Hill,NewYork.

Joly,A.B.,2002.Botânica:introduc¸ãoàtaxonomiavegetal,13thed.Companhia Edi-tora,SãoPaulo.

Kasali,A.A.,Winterhalter,P.,Adio,A.M.,Knapp,H.,Bonnlander,B.,2002.Chromenes inAgeratumconyzoides.FlavourFragr.J.17,247–250.

Kong,C.,Liang,W.,Hu,F.,Xu,X.,Wang,P.,Jiang,Y.,Xing,B.,2004.Allelochemicalsand theirtransformationsintheAgeratumconyzoidesintercroppedcitrusorchard soils.PlantSoil264,49–157.

Kraus,J.E.,Arduin,M.,1997.Manualbásicodemétodosemmorfologiavegetal.EDUR, RiodeJaneiro.

Krauter, D.,1985. Erfahrungen mit Etzolds FSA-Färbung für pflanzenschnitte. Mikrokosmos74,231–233.

Leitão,F.,Leitão,S.G.,Fonseca-Kruel,V.S.,Silva,I.M.,Martins,K.,2014.Medicinal plantstradedintheopen-airmarketsintheStateofRiodeJaneiro,Brazil: anoverviewontheirbotanicaldiversityandtoxicologicalpotential.Rev.Bras. Farmacogn.24,225–247.

Lima,R.K.,Cardoso,M.G.,Moraes,J.C.,Andrade,M.A.,Melo,B.A.,Rodrigues,V.G., 2010.Caracterizac¸ãoquímicaeatividadeinseticidadoóleoessencialde Agera-tumconyzoidesL.sobrealagarta-do-cartuchodomilhoSpodopterafrugiperda (Smith,1797)(Lepidoptera:Noctuidae).Biosci.J.26,1–5.

Liu,X.C.,Liu,Z.L.,2014.EvaluationoflarvicidalactivityoftheessentialoilofAgeratum conyzoidesL.aerialpartsanditsmajorconstituentsagainstAedesalbopictus.J. Entomol.Zool.Stud.2,345–350.

Lorenzi,H.,Matos,F.J.A.,2002.PlantasmedicinaisnoBrasil:nativaseexóticas. Plan-tarum,SãoPaulo.

Mabel,A.F.,Johnson,A.A.,Temitope,O.O.,2013.Petioleanatomyofsomespeciesof AsteraceaeinsouthwestNigeria.Afr.J.PlantSci.7,608–612.

Mabel,A.F.,Johnson,A.A.,Olufemi,O.O.,Ayomipo,A.A.T.,2014.Foliaranatomyof somespeciesofAsteraceaeinSouthWesternNigeria.Afr.J.PlantSci.8,426–440.

Martins,L.R.R.,Mourão,K.S.M.,Meyer-Albiero,A.L.,Cortez,D.A.G.,Dias-Filho,B.P., Nakamra,C.V.,2006.Estudomorfoanatômicopreliminardocauleedafolhade

Acanthospermumaustrale(Loefl.)Kuntze(Asteraceae-Heliantheae).Rev.Bras. Farmacogn.16,42–52.

Matos,J.F.B.,2007.Plantasmedicinais:guiadeselec¸ãoeempregodasplantasusadas emfitoterapianoNordestedoBrasil.ImprensaUniversitária,Fortaleza.

Metcalfe,C.R.,Chalk,L.,1950.AnatomyoftheDicotyledons:Leaves,Stem,andWood inRelationtoTaxonomywithNotesonEconomicUses.ClarendonPress,Oxford.

Millani, A.A., Rossatto, D.R., Rubin Filho, C.J., Kolb, R.M., 2010. Análise de crescimentoe anatomiafoliarda plantamedicinal AgeratumconyzoidesL. (Asteraceae)cultivadaemdiferentessubstratos.Rev.Bras.PlantasMed.12, 127–134.

Morais,W.C.C.,Lima,M.A.P.,Zanuncio,J.C.,Oliveira,M.A.,Braganc¸a,M.A.L.,Serrão, J.E.,Lucia,T.M.C.D.,2014.ExtractsofAgeratumconyzoides,Coriandrumsativum

andMenthapiperitainhibitthegrowthofthesymbioticfungusofleaf-cutting ants.Ind.CropsProd.65,463–466.

Moreira,M.D.,Picanc¸o,M.C.,Barbosa,L.C.A.,Guedes,R.N.C.,Barros,E.C.,Campos, M.R.,2007.CompoundsfromAgeratumconyzoides:isolation,structural elucida-tionandinsecticidalactivity.PestManag.Sci.63,615–621.

Moura,A.C.A.,Silva,E.L.F.,Fraga,M.C.A.,Wanderley,A.G.,Afiatpour,P.,Maia,M.B.S., 2005.AntiinflammatoryandchronictoxicitystudyoftheleavesofAgeratum conyzoidesL.inrats.Phytomedicine12,138–142.

Mussury,R.M.,Betoni,R.,Vieira,M.C.,Scalon,S.D.P.Q.,Barros,S.S.U.,2007.Morfo anatomiadoeixovegetativoaéreodeAchyroclinealata(Kunth)DC.(Asteraceae). Rev.Bras.PlantasMed.9,94–101.

Nery,M.I.S.,Potiguara,R.C.V.,Kikuchi,T.Y.S.,Garcia,T.B.,Lins,A.L.F.A.,2014. Mor-foanatomiadoeixovegetativoaéreodeAyapanatriplinervis(Vahl)R.M.King& H.Rob.(Asteraceae).Rev.Bras.PlantasMed.16,62–70.

Nogueira,J.H.C.,Gonc¸alez,E.,Galleti,S.R.,Facanali,R.,Marques,M.O.M.,Felício,J.D., 2010.AgeratumconyzoidesessentialoilasaflatoxinsuppressorofAspergillus flavus.Int.J.FoodMicrobiol.137,55–60.

Nour,A.M.M.,Khalid,S.A.,Kaiser,M.,Brun,R.,Abdalla,W.E.,Schmidt,T.J.,2010.The antiprotozoalactivityofmethylatedflavonoidsfromAgeratumconyzoidesL.J. Ethnopharmacol.129,127–130.

Odeleye,O.P.,Oluyege,J.O.,Aregbesola,O.A.,Odeleye,P.O.,2014.Evaluationof pre-liminaryphytochemicalandantibacterialactivityofAgeratumconyzoides(L.)on someclinicalbacterialisolates.Int.J.Eng.Sci.3,01–05.

Okunade,A.L.,2002.AgeratumconyzoidesL.Asteraceae.Fitoterapia73,1–16.

Oliveira,F.,Akisue,G.,2009.Fundamentosdefarmacobotânicaedemorfologia vegetal,3rded.Atheneu,SãoPaulo.

Patil,R.P.,Nimbalkar, M.S.,Jadhav, U.U., Dawkar,V.V., Govindwar, S.P.,2010.

(9)

Rahman,A.H.M.M.,Islam,A.K.M.R.,Rahman,M.M.,2013.Ananatomical investi-gationonAsteraceaefamilyatRajshahiDivision,Bangladesh.Int.J.Biosci.3, 13–23.

Sass,J.E.,1951.BotanicalMicrotechnique,2nded.IowaStateCollegePress,Ames.

Sousa,M.P.,Matos,M.E.O.,Matos,F.J.A.,Machado,M.I.L.,Craveiro,A.A.,2004. Con-stituintesquímicosativos epropriedadesbiológicasdeplantasmedicinais brasileiras.EditoraUFC,Fortaleza.

Souza,V.C.,Lorenzi,H.,2012.Botânicasistemática:guiailustradoparaidentificac¸ão dasfamíliasdefanerógamasnativaseexóticasnoBrasil,baseadoemAPGIII. InstitutoPlantarum,NovaOdessa.

Souza,J.P.,Santos,V.L.P.,Franco,C.R.C.,Bortolozo,E.A.F.Q.,Farago,P.V., Matzen-bacher,N.I.,Budel,J.M.,2013.BaccharisrufescensSpreng.var.tenuifolia(DC.)

Baker:contribuic¸ãoaoestudofarmacognóstico.Rev.Bras.PlantasMed.15, 566–574.

Teixeira,T.L.,Teixeira,S.C.,Silva,C.V.,Souza,M.A.,2014.Potentialtherapeuticuse ofherbalextractsintrypanosomiasis.Pathog.Glob.Health108,30–36.

Unamba,C.I.N.,Inyama,C.N.,Okeke,S.E.,Mbagwu,F.N.,2008.Leafepidermal fea-turesofAgeratumconyzoides,Aspiliaafricana,ChromolaenaodorataandTridax procumbens(Asteraceae).Int.Sci.Res.J.1,169–172.

Venable,D.L.,Levin,D.A.,1983.Morphologicaldispersalstructuresinrelationto growthhabitintheCompositae.Plant.Syst.Evol.143,1–16.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

(a) Scanning electron microscopy of the frontal view of the abaxial epidermis showing stomata and other epidermal cell; (B-F) location of silica using a backscattered

radula since this plant has a low frequency of non-glandular trichomes in the adaxial surface (Table 1), rendering the epidermic cells more exposed to the agrochemical action..

Sepals (Fig. 9) presented an uniseriate epidermis, which showed stomata and tabular cells only on their adaxial surface. On the abaxial surface, the cells were wider and occur

The tepals (Figs. 2A, C) presented uniseriate epidermis with cuticle flange, and periclinal thick- walled cells in the abaxial face and thin-walled cells in the

All leaves of these species are hypostomatic, and present: peltate trichomes on both surfaces; stomata sunk in epidermal depressions; small epidermal cells with thick walls

Leaf blade in cross section showing a dense indumentum (F), epidermal cells containing phenolic compounds (G) and mucilage idioblasts (arrows) in the adaxial surface (H, I)..

For the leaves and stems, the following parameters were considered: cuticle thickness in the adaxial surface; height of epidermal cells and thickness of the outer periclinal

In contrast, there was no significant effect involving the concentration factors of silicon and agar in vitro on the thickness of the adaxial and abaxial epidermal faces of the