AnBrasDermatol.2020;95(4):480---483
Anais
Brasileiros
de
Dermatologia
www.anaisdedermatologia.org.brCASE
REPORT
Multinucleate
cell
angiohistiocytoma:
an
uncommon
cutaneous
tumor
夽,夽夽
Anderson
Alves
Costa
a,∗,
Glaucia
Ferreira
Wedy
a,
Walter
Belda
Junior
a,
Paulo
Ricardo
Criado
baDepartmentofDermatology,UniversidadedeSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil bDepartmentofDermatology,FaculdadedeMedicinadoABC,SantoAndré,SP,Brazil
Received12May2019;accepted14October2019
Availableonline11May2020
KEYWORDS Casereports; Giantcells; Histiocytoma; Lowerextremity; Neoplasms; Vasculartissue
Abstract Multinucleate cell angiohistiocytoma is a rare, benign vascular proliferation of
unknownetiology.Itoccursmainlyinmiddle-agedwomenandusuallyaffectstheacralregions;
thelesionsappear asdiscrete,grouped,andasymptomaticviolaceouspapules.
Histopathol-ogyshowsproliferationanddilatedsmallvesselsinthepapillarydermis,fibrousstromawith
thickenedcollagenbundles,andmultinucleatedgiantcells.Todate,thereareapproximately
140casesdescribedintheindexedliterature.Thisreportpresentsthecaseofa62-year-old
woman withatypicalclinicalcondition,whochosenotundergotreatment,consideringthe
benigncharacterofherillness. Theclinicaland immunohistologicalaspects ofthisunusual
dermatologicalentityareemphasized.
©2020SociedadeBrasileiradeDermatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEspa˜na,S.L.U.Thisisan
openaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction
Multinucleate cell angiohistiocytoma (MCAH) is a rare, benign vascular proliferation of the skin, whose cause was unknown until recently. Currently, approximately 140 cases have been described in indexed literature
夽 Howtocitethisarticle:CostaAA,WedyGF,BeldaJrW,Criado
PR.Multinucleatecellangiohistiocytoma:anuncommoncutaneous
tumor.AnBrasDermatol.2020;95:480---3.
夽夽StudyconductedattheDepartmentofDermatology,
Universi-dadedeSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil.
∗Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:anderson.medicinausp@gmail.com(A.A.Costa).
(PubMed/MEDLINE). This report presents another clinical case of MCAH studied underimmunohistologicalbasis and presentsareviewoftherelevantliteraturethatdelineates the prominentclinicopathological features of thisunusual entity,whichisoftenconfusedwithdermatofibromainthe clinicalsetting.
Case
report
A62-year-oldCaucasianwomanwasreferredtothisclinic byhergeneralphysicianduetheonsetofcutaneouslesions on left arm and right forearm eight months ago. The patient’spastmedicalhistorywasunremarkable.An exten-sive panel of routine blood exams revealed nosignificant
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abd.2019.10.005
0365-0596/©2020SociedadeBrasileiradeDermatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEspa˜na,S.L.U.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC
Multinucleatecellangiohistiocytoma:anuncommoncutaneoustumor 481 abnormalities, including negative anti-HIV serology. She
denied previous solid organtransplantor use of immuno-suppressive drugs.The lesions wereasymptomatic. In the lasttwomonths,shenoticedanewgroupoflesionsonher abdomen,rightthigh,andback.Ondermatological exami-nation,asymmetricpainlesserythematoviolaceouspapules wereobserved,with3---10mmindiameter(Fig.1).
Punchbiopsiesoftheskinlesionswereperformed,which showedanormalepidermisandfibrohistiocyticproliferation withsmallvesselsinthereticulardermis,displayinglumen vesselsfilledwithprominentendothelialcells,involvedwith aperivascularinflammatoryresponsecomposedby multin-ucleatedhistiocyticcells (MCs)andafew plasmacells. In thepapillarydermis,fibroblasticproliferationandthickened collagen fibers were found (Figs. 2 and 3) and numer-ousbizarreMCswithscallopedmarginswerefound in the
Figure 1 Cutaneous erythematoviolaceous flatted papules
rangingfrom3to10mmindiameter,arrangedonthedorsum.
Figure 2 Regular acanthosis in the epidermis and overall
increasedcellularitywere present throughoutthedermis, as
well as anincreased number ofdilated blood vessels in the
upperandmiddermis,lymphohistiocyticinfiltrate,andthicker
collagenbundles(Hematoxylin&eosin,×40).
Figure 3 Characteristic irregular multinucleate cells of
MCAH, typified by angular borders and multiple potentially
hyperchromatic nuclei in the dermis and enlargement of
endothelial nuclei in the capillaries (Hematoxylin & eosin,
×400).
adjacentdermis.Theimmunohistochemical(IHC)panel per-formedfoundthefollowing:S-100protein(negative),FXIIIa (positive)in MCs,CD68 (positive) in MCs, CD34 and CD31 (positive)insmallvessels,andCD4(positive)indermal lym-phocytes(Figs.4and5).Thefinaldiagnosiswasestablished ascompatible with multinucleate cell angiohistiocytoma. Duetothebenign natureof theillness,thepatientchose nottoundergotreatment.
Figure4 Immunohistochemistrystudy.Histiocyticand
multi-nucleatedcellsarepositiveforFactorXIIIa(×400).
Figure 5 Immunohistochemistry study. Positive for CD68
482 CostaAAetal.
Discussion
ThedesignationMCAHwasoriginallyintroducedin1985by SmithandWilson-Jones,1representingararefibrohistiocytic
vascularproliferationofunknownetiologythatisreported three times more frequently in women, and commonly affectsmiddle-aged (> 40 years) or elderly individuals.2,3
To date, there are about 140 cases of MCAH reported in the indexed literature (PubMed/MEDLINE), and its preva-lenceisbelievedtobeunderestimatedduetopoorclinical recognitionofthispathology.
Lesionsareasymptomaticandaremostlylocatedonthe face and in the acral regions, although they have been reportedin other locations, such asthe trunk and, more rarely,themucousmembranes;2 theyareusuallyunilateral
andpresent aspapules rangingfrom2-15mm indiameter. They may appear as reddish, pink, violaceous, or brown papuleswithaslightlyraiseddome-shapedsurface,ormay beflatandsmooth.2,4Bilateralinvolvementandeven
gener-alizedformshavebeendocumentedinafewcases.2MCAH
lesionsdevelopoverweekstomonths,withnotendencyto spontaneousregression.5
Regarding the differential clinical diagnosis, special attention should be given to Kaposi’s sarcoma, espe-cially when the MCAH is presented as grouped papules.6
Acroangiodermatitis,annulargranuloma,angiofibroma, der-matofibroma, microvenular hemangioma, lichen planus, lymphocytoma,andreaction toinsectbite shouldalsobe included.7
AlthoughtheetiologyandpathogenesisofMCAHarestill unknown,amongthe hypotheses,thepredominant under-standingis that lesionsarise from a reactive ratherthan a neoplasticprocess. This hypothesis is supported by the factthat it is a benignentity withindolentbehavior, the absenceofextracutaneousinvolvementormalignant trans-formation,andthepossibilityofspontaneousregressionis compatiblewithareactiveratherthanneoplastic inflamma-toryprocess.3,8,9
Anothertheory proposesfemalehormonalinfluence on pathogenesis,noting theidentification of estrogen recep-tor(ER)alphaexpressionininterstitialandmultinucleated cells; this factor would explain the higher frequency in women.However,theidentificationofERpositivityhasnot beenconsistentinotherreportedcases.3,8
In2015,Frewpublishedareviewof142casesofMCAH. TheauthorhypothesizedthatalthoughMCAHhasaninitial inflammatoryandvascularorigin, histopathologicalevents associatedwithfibrosis andatrophyplayakeyroleinthe pathogenesisof thedisease,especiallyregarding the pro-gressiontomultiplelesions.10
The main histopathological finding in MCAH is the proliferationofvenulesandcapillariesinthedermis, accom-paniedbylymphocyticinfiltrateandangularmultinucleated cells. These cells may exhibit up to ten hyperchromatic nuclei and have basophilic cytoplasm; the cells express vimentinandfactorXIIIa,andthereisdermal fibrosisand sparselymphohistiocyticinfiltrate.2,7,10
ThehistologicalfindingsofMCAHaresimilartothoseof severalbenignskintumorsandotherfibroangiomatous con-ditions,whichhasledsomeauthorstoquestionthestatusof MCAHasanindependenthistopathologicalentity.6,10 Some
authorsconsiderMCAHasavariantofdermatofibroma,with
prominent vascular component and peculiar multinucle-atedcells.10Otherhistologicaldifferentialdiagnosesinclude
Kaposi’ssarcoma,angiofibroma,lymphocytomacutis,lichen planusandangiolymphoidhyperplasiawitheosinophilia.
Differential diagnosis with Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) is important, because there is great clinical similarity betweentheentities,buttherearesomehistopathological differences.6,8,10 Microscopically, KS consists of
irregu-lar anastomotic vascular channels and sieve-like chinks, extravasation of red blood cells, hemosiderin deposits, and spindle-shaped endothelial cells.3 KS cells express
podoplanin,amarkerofthelymphaticendothelium,which isnotexpressedbyMCAHendothelialcells.Confirmationof humanherpesvirus8(HHV8)positivity(demonstratedwith IHCorinsituhybridization)allowsthedistinctionofKSfrom MCAH.3,10
InmostreportedcasesofMCAH,theIHCpanelperformed included staining for factor VIII,factor XIIIa, CD31,CD34, CD68, andvimentinin both thevascular endotheliumand MCs.InFrew’sreviewarticle,IHCshowed60%CD68-stained vascularendothelialcells.10 Asexpected,endothelialcells
alsoexpressedfactorVIIIstaining,CD31,andCD34,andin the present case, CD31 andCD34 markers werealso pos-itive in these cells. Frew noted that MCs were negative in stainingfor endothelial markers, factor VIII,andCD34, with approximately half of the cases positively staining macrophages/histiocyteswithfactorXIIIaandCD68.10
Fac-torXIIIaandCD68werealsonotedintheMCsofthepresent case.
MCAHtreatmentisgenerallynotrequiredbecauseofthe benignnatureofthecondition,exceptforestheticreasons. Lesions can be treated with intralesional corticosteroids, surgical excision, cryotherapy, argonlaser, intense pulsed light, andCO2 laser.Recently, a case treated withpulsed
dyelaserwasreported,withgoodresult.3,5
The present report adds another case of MCAH to the literature, highlighting the difficulty of diagnosing this condition in dermatological practice. It is important to establish the correct diagnosis for this clinical condition and, especially, to excludemore serious diseases suchas KS, mainly in the scenario of patientswith AIDS or organ transplantation.
Financial
support
Nonedeclared.
Authors’
contributions
Anderson Alves Costa: Drafting and editing of the manuscript.
GlauciaFerreiraWedy: Conceptionandplanningof the study.
Walter Belda Junior: Intellectual participation in the propaedeutic and/or therapeutic conduct of the studied cases.
Paulo Ricardo Criado: Drafting and editing of the manuscript; intellectual participationin the propaedeutic and/or therapeutic conduct of the studied cases; critical reviewoftheliterature;criticalreviewofthemanuscript.
Multinucleatecellangiohistiocytoma:anuncommoncutaneoustumor 483
Conflicts
of
interest
Nonedeclared.
References
1.SmithNP,JonesWE.Multinucleatecellangiohistiocytoma---a newentity.BrJDermatol.1985;113:15.
2.WangM,Abdul-FattahB,WangC,ZhaoY,QuX,Al-MurieshM. Generalizedmultinucleatecellangiohistiocytoma:casereport andliteraturereview.JCutanPathol.2017;44:125---34.
3.GrgurichE,QuinnK,OramC,McClainR,LountzisN. Multinucle-atecellangiohistiocytoma:casereportandliteraturereview.J CutanPathol.2019;46:59---61.
4.ApplebaumDS,Shuja F,HicksL,CockerellC,HsuS. Multinu-cleatecellangiohistiocytoma:acasereportandreviewofthe literature.DermatolOnlineJ.2014;20:22610.
5.RicherV, LuiH. Facialmultinucleatecell angiohistiocytoma: long-termremissionwith585nmpulseddyelaser.ClinExp Der-matol.2016;41:312---3.
6.JonesWE,CerioR,SmithNP.Multinucleatecell angiohistiocys-toma:anacquiredvascularanomalytobedistinguishedfrom Kaposi’ssarcoma.BrJDermatol.1990;122:651---3.
7.DoaneJA,PurdyK,PasternakS.Generalizedmultinucleatecell angiohistiocytoma.JCutanMedSurg.2015;19:323---5.
8.CesinaroAM,RoncatiL,MaioranaA. Estrogenreceptoralpha overexpression in Multinucleate cell angiohistiocytoma: new insightsintothepathogenesisofareactiveprocess.AmJ Der-matopathol.2010;32:655---9.
9.Calderaro J, Rethers L, Ortonne N. Multinucleated cells angiohistiocytoma: a reactive lesion? Am J Dermatopathol. 2010;32:415---7.
10.Frew JW.Multinucleate cell angiohistiocytoma: clinicopatho-logicalcorrelationof142caseswithinsightsintoetiologyand pathogenesis.AmJDermatopathol.2015;37:222---8.