05/09/2016
From Net Neutrality to Net Feudality
http://www.medialaws.eu/fromnetneutralitytonetfeudality/
1/4
Law and Policy of the Media in a Comparative Perspective
YOU ARE AT: Home
»
Comments»
From Net Neutrality to Net FeudalityHOME WHO WE ARE NEWS COMMENTS ANALYSES FOREIGN CORRESPONDENTS INTERVIEWS
LAW AND MEDIA WORKING PAPER SERIES
La nuova frontiera delle intercettazioni. I Troyan Horse e le libertà fondamentali. L’approdo delle Sezioni Unite – Law and Media Working Paper Series no. 10/2016 August 8, 2016
Diritti audiovisivi, sport e cinema: problemi e prospettive – Law and Media working paper series no. 9/2016 July 29, 2016
La tutela del pluralismo nel Sistema Integrato delle Comunicazioni (SIC): l’art. 43 del Testo unico dei servizi di media audiovisivi e radiofonici e il Regolamento allegato alla delibera Agcom n. 368/14/CONS – Law and Media Working paper series no. 8/2016 July 20, 2016
La Corte Costituzionale tedesca affronta il tema dei limiti alle investigazioni compiute con strumenti di sorveglianza occulta: come contemperare il dovere dello Stato di proteggere la popolazione dalle gravi forme di criminalità con la garanzia dei diritti fondamentali della persona? – Law and Media working paper series no. 7/2016 June 16, 2016
BOOKSHOP
The Digital Single Market Copyright. Internet and Copyright Law in the European Perspective
The Internet and Constitutional Law
Codice della comunicazione digitale
Verso un Internet Bill of Rights?
La regolamentazione dei contenuti digitali. Studi per i primi quindici anni dell'Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (19982013)
Eventi sportivi e diritti audiovisivi: le esclusive tra concorrenza e regolazione
Modeling the Liability of 0
COMMENTS
BY LUCA BELLI ON APRIL 20, 2015
From Net Neutrality to Net Feudality
The original version of this article was published by the Brasil Post
The Internet is a quasifeudal environment. In order to access the Internet you have to accept the contractual provisions unilaterally defined by your telecom operator. In order to use online applications and services, you have to accept the term of service unilaterally defined by the service providers. Besides unilaterally defining the rules that govern their cyberspaces, telecom operators and services providers have also the possibility to inforce them through technical measures.
Nevertheless, Internet users are not (yet) peasants 2.0 because they enjoy some freedom to choose amongst different cyberspaces, contrary to peasants that were bonded to the land. Indeed, Internet users can freely choose the cyberspace they want to live in, using the applications and services they prefer and, theoretically, creating and freely sharing new apps and services. This is the quintessence of the human right to freely seek, impart and receive information and ideas regardless of frontiers. Such freedom is enabled by the net neutrality principle, which mandates nondiscriminatory Internet traffic management, so that your telecom operator may not interfere in your freedom to access and share legal content, applications and services. Net neutrality is instrumental to protect Internet users’ freedom of expression allowing them to freely innovate and compete with tech giant on a level playing field. This is why several countries protect net neutrality in their national laws.
Zero Rating: Last Threat to Neutrality or First Step to Feudality?
Zerorating is the practices of sponsoring access to specific applications and services, whose data consumption will not count against mobile users’ data caps. Zerorating supporters usually portray this practice as ‘price discrimination’ rather than technical discrimination. However, it is obvious that when the datacap is reached only zerorated services may be accessed. As Norwegian Communications Authority’s Frode Sørensen explains “the fact is that once you have used your quota, the traffic that is [zerorated] will be allowed to continue, while all other traffic will be throttled or blocked. This is clearly a case of discrimination between different types of traffic [and]this is exactly the kind of situation net neutrality aims to avoid.”
This means that zerorating is not compatible with the net neutrality principle and for this reason several countries having net neutrality legislation, such as Canada, Slovenia and The Netherlands have already decided to ban zerorating. What is particularly interesting about the Dutch example is that one week after the decision of banning zerorating, the main telecom operator in the Netherlands, KPN, decided to double the data cap volume of its mobile tariff plans, to foster greater use of mobile Internet. And the same trend can be remarked in Brazil, where telecom operator Claro has just decided to expand datacaps while banning zerorating. This is empirical evidence that banning zerorating incentivise operators to expand data caps and reduce the price of mobile Internet connection.
Facebook Friends?
The most debated and controversial example of zerorated services is Facebookled Internet.org project, consisting in a group of selected services that are provided “for free” in several developing countries. Internet.org may soon be offered in Brazil according to last Friday’s statements by Brazilian President Dilma Roussef and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg,
who publicly stated they were ‘working together to connect more people to the internet in Brazil’ with the goal of ‘digital inclusion.’ Although the intention may be commendable, these statements deserve to be read with caution.
19 Recommend
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Ok Read more
05/09/2016
From Net Neutrality to Net Feudality
http://www.medialaws.eu/fromnetneutralitytonetfeudality/
2/4
NEWS POPULAR POSTS TOP REVIEWS
0
0
0
0 Modeling the Liability of Internet Service Providers: Google vs. Vivi Down. A Constitutional Perspective
Internet: regole e tutela dei diritti fondamentali
Tutela del Copyright e della privacy sul web: quid iuris?
SEPTEMBER 5, 2016
Broadband rollout and access to existing utility infrastructures in Italy
AUGUST 31, 2016
Statement by VicePresident Ansip and Commissioner Oettinger welcoming guidelines on EU net neutrality rules by the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC)
AUGUST 31, 2016
State aid: Ireland gave illegal tax benefits to Apple worth up to €13 billion
JULY 26, 2016
Business Internationalisation between European Law and Global Law – King’s College London, 2529 July
Broadband rollout and access to existing utility infrastructures in Italy September 5, 2016
Statement by VicePresident Ansip and Commissioner Oettinger welcoming guidelines on EU net neutrality rules by the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) August 31, 2016
State aid: Ireland gave illegal tax benefits to Apple worth up to €13 billion August 31, 2016
Business Internationalisation between European Law and Global Law – King’s College London, 2529 July July 26, 2016
Antitrust: Commission takes further steps in investigations alleging Google’s comparison shopping and advertisingrelated practices breach EU rules July 14, 2016
FOLLOW US
ARCHIVES ABOUT AUTHOR
LUCA BELLI
RELATED POSTS
LEAVE A REPLY
Tweet Curtir 19 pessoas curtiram isso. Seja o primeiro entre seus amigos.
In fact, the goal of the suggested FacebookBrazil partnership would be to foster access to Internet.org which is not the same thing as access to the Internet. It is important to stress that Internet.org is not the Internet; it’s only a tiny subset of Internet applications, provided by few dominant players. Furthermore, this offering is marketed as being provided for ‘free’, but is it really free? One may, on the contrary, argue that when users decide to utilise zerorated service, they pay them and they pay them twice.
First, they pay these ‘free’ services with their personal data and their most intimate information, which are utilised to build very precise user profiles. Such profiles are very dear to advertisers. Hence it seems incorrect to argue that access to Internet.org is ‘free’. Au contraire, the difference is that personal data, rather than cash, is the currency.
Second, users pay their access to zerorated services by waiving their freedom to establish a business that may compete with the zerorated service and, more importantly, by waiving their freedom to seek, impart and receive information and ideas that are not conveyed through the zerorated services. Indeed, zerorated services incentivise users to seek, impart and receive information and ideas only within the zerorated cyberspaces, which would be the only walledgarden where information and ideas may be sought, imparted and received “for free”. Needless to stress that such a scenario would create an enormous power concentration in the hands of those market players that, besides being already dominant, would acquire the capability to control what information and ideas may (or may not) be exchanged by users.
The real price that users pay for offerings such as Internet.org seems to be an authorisation to unlimited access to their private life and a competitionwaiver pertaining to seeking, imparting and receiving information and ideas. However, these are fundamental rights of the individual and states have a positive obligation to protect individuals’ fundamental rights. In this historical moment it is essential that states play a leading role in avoiding the rise of feudalism 2.0 by choosing sustainable policies and protecting fundamental rights. Policymakers have the responsibility to lead democratic digital inclusion processes and to resist the enticing proposals of the new cyberlords.
Luca Belli, PhD is a researcher at the Center for Technology and Society (CTS) of Fundação Getulio Vargas Law School, Rio de Janeiro. Luca served as a Network Neutrality Expert for the Council of Europe, is founder and coordinator of the IGF Dynamic Coalition on Network Neutrality as well as cofounder and cocoordinator the IGF Dynamic Coalition on Platform Responsibility.
Share this article!
Download article as PDF
SHARE.
Se i captatori informatici diventano la cartina di tornasole delle nostre libertà fondamentali
JULY 8, 2016 0
Le app che profilano lo stile di guida rispettano la privacy del guidatore?
JULY 1, 2016 0 E’ in vigore il nuovo regolamentogenerale sulla protezione dei dati
JUNE 23, 2016 0
MediaLaws
718 likes Like Page05/09/2016
From Net Neutrality to Net Feudality
http://www.medialaws.eu/fromnetneutralitytonetfeudality/
3/4
September 2016 (1)
August 2016 (4)
July 2016 (13)
June 2016 (22)
May 2016 (16)
April 2016 (13)
March 2016 (12)
February 2016 (16)
January 2016 (17)
December 2015 (20)
November 2015 (21)
October 2015 (30)
September 2015 (14)
July 2015 (23)
June 2015 (19)
May 2015 (25)
April 2015 (24)
March 2015 (34)
February 2015 (25)
January 2015 (22)
December 2014 (19)
November 2014 (24)
October 2014 (31)
September 2014 (23)
August 2014 (1)
July 2014 (30)
June 2014 (28)
May 2014 (25)
April 2014 (21)
March 2014 (26)
February 2014 (25)
January 2014 (21)
December 2013 (33)
November 2013 (35)
October 2013 (46)
September 2013 (32)
August 2013 (2)
July 2013 (30)
June 2013 (43)
May 2013 (64)
April 2013 (50)
March 2013 (51)
February 2013 (58)
January 2013 (39)
December 2012 (50)
November 2012 (55)
October 2012 (63)
September 2012 (45) You must be logged in to post a comment.
05/09/2016
From Net Neutrality to Net Feudality
http://www.medialaws.eu/fromnetneutralitytonetfeudality/
4/4
Privacy
September 2012 (45)
August 2012 (10)
July 2012 (75)
June 2012 (86)
May 2012 (77)
April 2012 (62)
March 2012 (72)
February 2012 (61)
January 2012 (52)
December 2011 (58)
November 2011 (77)
October 2011 (70)
September 2011 (51)
August 2011 (29)
July 2011 (58)
June 2011 (72)
May 2011 (58)
April 2011 (46)
March 2011 (61)
February 2011 (55)
January 2011 (57)
December 2010 (17)
WELCOME FRIENDS
Observatory on Cybercrime Osservatorio Cybercrime
Iptegrity Internet & CopyrightLaw and Policy
IP Osgoode Intellectual Property Law & Technology Program
Center for Media and Communication Studies
Program in Comparative Media Law and Policy of the Institute of Social Legal Studies, Law Faculty, Oxford University
LSE Media Policy Project
Osservatorio Pugliese della Proprietà Intellettuale Concorrenza e Consumo Digitale
Key 4 biz. Knowledge for business
Diritto Mercato Tecnologia
