Occurrence of pinnipeds on the coast of Rio
de Janeiro State, Brazil
jailson fulgencio de moura
1,2, bruna pagliani s. di dario
2and salvatore siciliano
2 1PPG em Sau´de Pu´blica e Meio Ambiente, Escola Nacional de Sau´de Pu´blica/FIOCRUZ,2Grupo de Estudos de Mamı´feros Marinhosda Regia˜o dos Lagos (GEMM – Lagos)—Escola Nacional de Sau´de Pu´blica—FIOCRUZ, Departamento de Endemias, Rua Leopoldo Bulho˜es, 1480– 68 Andar, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21041-210, Brazil
The present knowledge of pinnipeds’ distribution is principally based on the location of breeding colonies. Several species of pinnipeds have shown the ability to undertake long travels to different and unusual locations, where they are frequently inter-preted as vagrants. A total of seven species of pinnipeds are known to occur along the Brazilian coast: four belong to the family Otariidae and three to the family Phocidae. From 1954 to 2008 a total of 54 records of pinnipeds were reviewed for the coast of Rio de Janeiro State, ten of them were new records, representing 18.2% of the total. The most common species registered in the study area was Arctocephalus tropicalis (49.1%; N ¼ 27) followed by Mirounga leonina (20%; N ¼ 11). The other species recorded were Lobodon carcinophaga, Otaria flavescens, Arctocephalus australis and Hydrurga leptonyx. From 51 pinniped specimens with information on periods of occurrence, 76.5% (N ¼ 39) were reported during winter, and the other 12 speci-mens were equally distributed over the three other seasons. Most sub-Antarctic fur seals (88%) and southern elephant seals (83%) were males. The majority of the species were classified as sexually immature. The seasonal pattern of the pinnipeds found on the coast of Rio de Janeiro State is related to the intensive northward flow of the Malvinas/Falkland Current during winter. In addition, the potential to swim long distances together with the lack of physical barriers in the marine environment could help the dispersion of the seals to distant regions far from their traditional breeding or feeding regions.
Keywords:pinnipeds, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, distribution, season, occurrence
Submitted 21 June 2010; accepted 19 December 2010
I N T R O D U C T I O N
Pinnipeds are widely diverse in nature and occupy a variety of habitats, from the tropics to the Polar Regions of both hemi-spheres (King, 1983). They are distributed worldwide along the coast and oceanic islands in the marine environment, but also inhabit freshwater environments (e.g. Phoca sibirica) (Bowen et al., 2009). The distribution of pinnipeds is affected by physical and biological characteristics of the habitat, demo-graphic factors, morphological and physiological constraints and human actions (Riedman, 1990; Bowen et al., 2009).
The knowledge about pinnipeds’ distribution is principally based on the location of breeding colonies. On the other hand, little is known about where most species forage at sea and how far from the breeding station the species could disperse (Bowen et al., 2009).
Several species of pinnipeds have shown the ability to undertake long travels to different and unusual locations, where they are frequently interpreted as vagrants (Pinedo, 1990; Moura & Siciliano, 2007; Ferreira et al., 2008; Silva et al., 2009; Velozo et al., 2009; Moura et al., 2010). The dis-persal pattern of some pinnipeds is frequently attributed to the search for food resources, influence of ocean current, wind force or the three factors acting together.
Among seven species of pinniped with occurrences on the Brazilian coast four belong to the family Otariidae and three to the family Phocidae, including: southern elephant seal (Mirounga leonina); leopard seal (Hydrurga leptonyx); crabeater seal (Lobodon carcinophaga); South American fur seal (Arctocephalus australis); sub-Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus tropicalis); Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus gazella); and South American sea lion (Otaria flavescens) (Vaz Ferreira, 1965; Pinedo et al., 1992; Simo˜es-Lopes et al., 1995).
Despite that there are no established reproductive sites on the Brazilian coast, pinnipeds have been reported in coastal regions of this country for thousands of years. The oldest palaeontological records of sea lions and fur seals on the coast of Brazil are pleistocenic fossils of the genus Arctocephalus and the species O. flavescens found in southern Brazil (Oliveira & Drehmer, 1997; Drehmer & Ribeiro, 1998; Rodrigues et al., 2004). In archaeological sites of southern Brazil there are skeletal remains of A. australis and A. tropica-lis from 4000 and 1500 years BP (Castilho et al., 1998).
Most records of pinnipeds are obviously concentrated in the southern region of Brazil, as this region is located closer to some breeding grounds (e.g. A. australis, O. flavescens and M. leonina) than the other lower latitudinal regions of the Brazilian coast. However, sub-Antarctic pinnipeds such as sub-Antarctic fur seals have been reported in Alagoas State (north-eastern Brazil, 09842′S) and southern elephant seals have been recorded as far north as the Fernando de Noronha Archipelago (Pernambuco State, north-eastern Brazil, 03850′S) (Ximenez, 1980; Lodi & Siciliano, 1989).
Corresponding author: J.F. de Moura
Email: jailsonfm@gmail.com
The information about pinnipeds in tropical areas of the Brazillian coast is scarce and based on few individuals. The aim of this paper is to review the occurrence of pinnipeds on the coast of Rio de Janeiro Sate and to add new and unpub-lished information. The review of the occurrences of the seals could contribute to an evaluation of the dispersal patterns and seasonality of them.
M A T E R I A L S A N D M E T H O D S
In this study we reviewed the occurrences of pinnipeds on the coast of Rio de Janeiro State, south-eastern Brazil. The records were obtained from abstracts of scientific meetings, newspa-pers, theses, TV news, scientific papers and personal obser-vations in the field. Material acquired from the seals, such as photographs and reliable information were examined to obtain important data for this study, related to local occur-rence, sex and body length. The date of the records was used to verify possible seasonal influences on the occurrences of the seals in Rio de Janeiro State. To determine whether there were seasonal trends in the occurrences of the seals, the data were categorized into four seasons: summer (January – March); autumn (April – June); winter (July – September); and spring (October – December).
The locality of each occurrence was used to create a geo-graphical view in order to infer the distribution of the seals along the coast using ESRI-ArcView 3.2 software.
The total body length was used to estimate sexual maturity of the specimens of pinnipeds following Hamilton (1934), Jefferson et al. (1993), SCS (2001) and Adam (2005) (Table 1).
R E S U L T S
From 1954 to 2008 a total of 54 records of pinnipeds were reviewed for the coast of Rio de Janeiro State (Figure 1; Table 2). Most records were located in the region near Rio de Janeiro city and in less proportion near Arraial do Cabo and Bu´zios. In the northern region of the related state and around Ilha Grande Bay very few records were reported (Figure 1).
We present in this paper ten new and non-published records of pinnipeds, representing 18.2% of the records (Figure 2). The most common species registered in the study area was A. tropicalis (49.1%; N ¼ 27) followed by the M. leonina (20%; N ¼ 11). These two species alone accounted for 69.1% of all species of pinnipeds recorded. From the other four species registered, L. carcinophaga and O. flavescens have both four records, A. australis six records and H. leptonyx three. From 51 pinniped specimens with information about
date, 76.5% (N ¼ 39) occurred during winter, and the other 12 specimens were equally distributed along the three other seasons (Figure 3). The sub-Antarctic fur seals and southern elephant seals followed the same pattern of the total records, with the highest frequency occurring in the winter. All the specimens of H. leptonyx (N ¼ 3) occurred during winter. Four of the six records of A. australis occurred during winter, one during summer and one during autumn. Two specimens of L. carcinophaga were distributed during autumn and winter and two records of O. flavescens were dis-tributed in the summer and spring.
From the 17 specimens of sub-Antarctic fur seals with information about sex 15 (88%) were males and only two were females. Five out of the six sexed southern elephant seals recorded in this study were males. Both lone records with information about the sex of the crabeater seal and southern fur seal were female. The only sexed leopard seal was male and two specimens of O. flavescens with information about their sex were one male and one female.
From 13 specimens of A. tropicalis with body length infor-mation 92.3% were sexually immature (10 males, 1 female and 1 non-sexed) except for one female which was classified as sexually mature. Seven out of eight specimens of M. leonina with body length information were classified as sexually immature and one specimen measuring 300 cm of body length could not be classified due to the unavailable sex infor-mation. There were only one record each with body length information for O. flavescens, L. carcinophaga and A. australis. Otaria flavescens was a sexually mature female, L. carcino-phaga was classified as a sexually immature female and A. aus-tralis as sexually immature with unknown sex. One measured H. leptonix was classified as a sexually mature male and another one was sexually immature with unknown sex.
D I S C U S S I O N
Six out of seven species with occurrence in Brazilian waters have been recorded in the tropical regions. The most common species registered along the coast of Rio de Janeiro State and also on the north-east coast of Brazil is the sub-Antarctic fur seal as previously described by Moura & Siciliano (2007). The occurrences of most seals were higher during winter. According to Castello & Pinedo (1977) and Pinedo (1990) this seasonal pattern is related to the stronger northward flow of the Malvinas/Falkland Current (MFC) during winter, which could drive the seals to tropical waters on the Brazilian coast. There is a recurrent justification for the cold temperate/sub-Antarctic species presence based on the effects of the MFC. However, the collision (confluence) of the southbound subtropical Brazil Current and the north-bound sub-Antarctic MFC pivots seasonally around a fixed point at 38.98S – 54.28W for nearly 300 km (Gordon, 1981; Chelton et al., 1990; Saraceno et al., 2005), and after collision the main flow of the MFC describes a sharp cyclonic loop, forming the Malvinas Return Flow (MRF) (Palma et al., 2004; see figure 1 in Saraceno et al., 2005). Despite the influ-ence of the MFC on the occurrinflu-ence of seals in tropical waters of Brazil the behaviour of that current also hardly justifies the northern presence of seals by itself.
The upwelling zone extending from Cabo Frı´o (238S) to Cabo Santa Marta Grande (298S) on the Brazilian coast, although representing locally upwelling events with stronger
Table 1.Total body length (in cm) related to the sexual maturity of seal species with occurrence for Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil.
Species Males Females Sources
Arctocephalus tropicalis ≥180 ≥99 Jefferson et al., 1993 Mirounga leonina ≥400 ≥250 Jefferson et al., 1993 Lobodon carcinophaga ≥205 ≥205 Adam, 2005 Otaria flavescens ≥213 ≥142 Hamilton, 1934 Arctocephalus australis ≥200 ≥150 SCS, 2001 Hydrurga leptonyx ≥250 ≥240 SCS, 2001
occurrence during summer (Emilsson, 1961; Matsuura, 1986; Castello, 1990; Castro & Miranda, 1998; Campos et al., 2000), brings productive South Atlantic Central Water to the coast and may constitute a hotspot for prey concentration, which could justify the presence of seal vagrants. Local enhanced prey concentration or spawning events were recorded for squid (Haimovici & Perez, 1991) and pelagic fish (Bakun & Parrish, 1990, 1991; Matsuura, 1996), with a clear influence on marine and shore bird distribution near these frontal areas (Antas, 1991; Valentin, 2001).
In addition, the potential to swim long distances together with the lack of physical barriers in the marine environment could help the dispersion of seals for distant regions far from their traditional breeding or feeding regions (Silva, 2004; Moura et al., 2010).
After cessation of the hunting activities on seals in the southern hemisphere, some colonies have shown important signs of population growth. The population growth could result in erratic movements of seals possibly associated with the search for new suitable places to forage or colonization of new locations (Moura & Siciliano, 2007; Moura et al., 2010). As pinnipeds are not a familiar sight to beach-goers in Rio de Janeiro State, their occurrence often attracts people (Moura & Siciliano, 2007). Infectious diseases discovered in marine mammals have the potential to be transmitted to other mammals (Geraci & Ridgway, 1991; Cowan et al., 2001). The contact of humans with pinnipeds could increase the risk of disease transmission from the seals to humans or the opposite situation (Geraci & Lounsbury, 2005). Bastida et al. (1999) described a case of tuberculosis in a wild sub-Antarctic fur seal found on the Argentine coast. Recently, Blanc et al. (2009) identified antibodies to influenza viruses in South American fur seals from Uruguayan colonies. The authors confirmed that influenza A viruses circulate in
marine mammals and also showed, for the first time, indirect evidence of influenza B infections in Arctocephalus australis. The public health must be taken into account in any future management plan for pinnipeds, particularly as it relates to the translocation and reintroduction of vagrant individuals along the Brazilian coast.
The distribution of seals along Rio de Janeiro State cer-tainly reflects the non-systematic collection of records along the coastline. The concentration of records around Rio de Janeiro city is probably associated with the excessive presence of the media, environmental organizations and universities. The concentration of records near Bu´zios and Arraial do Cabo is justified by the presence of a long term monitoring programme carried out by the GEMM – Lagos (marine mammals research group) initiated in 1999.
Leopard seal
Leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) are widely distributed in Antarctic and sub-Antarctic regions, occurring from the coast of the Antarctic Continent north throughout the pack ice and at most sub-Antarctic islands, such as Herd (Gwynn, 1953), Auckland, Campbell (Reeves et al., 1992) and Kerguelen (Bester, 1981). Small seasonal groups are also recorded in the Malvinas/Falklands (Hamilton, 1934), South Georgia (Walker et al., 1998) and Macquarie (Rounsevell & Eberhard, 1980) Islands. The northward movement of H. leptonyx is seasonal and influenced by ice conditions (King, 1983).
Few leopard seals have been recorded in the western South Atlantic (Rodrı´guez et al., 2003). The occurrences of this seal is based on solitary specimens found in Argentina (Rodrı´guez et al., 2003), Uruguay (Vaz Ferreira, 1984) and Brazil (Ximenez et al., 1987; Pinedo, 1990; Rosas et al., 1992;
Fig. 1.Location of occurrence of the pinnipeds recorded along the coast of Rio de Janeiro State. Rio de Janeiro city (RJC); Ilha Grande Bay (IGB); Bu´zios (B); Arraial do Cabo (AC); Macae´ (M).
Simo˜es-Lopes et al., 1995). Most of the few leopard seals recorded in Brazil have been found in the south region (Rodrı´guez et al., 2003) and its northernmost occurrence was registered in Rio de Janeiro State (Rosas et al., 1992).
The three records presented in this paper occurred during winter (July – August). Rodrı´guez et al. (2003) found that 90% of the leopard seals were recorded from June to September in
the western South Atlantic. Similar seasonal patterns of occur-rence have also been observed on the coast of Australia and in South Georgia, Macquarie, Malvinas/Falklands and Kerguelen Islands. On the Australian coast most of the leopard seals are found stranded from August to October (King, 1983). Some sub-Antarctic islands such as South Georgia, Kerguelen, Heard and St Paul, are the recipients of many of the winter
Table 2.Records of pinnipeds found along the coast of Rio de Janeiro State (RJ), Brazil.
Species Date Locality Sex BL (cm) References
A. australis March 1987 Macae´—RJ — 100 Siciliano & Lodi, 1989
A. australis 10 August 1994 Marica´—RJ — — Siciliano & Franco, 2005
A. australis 12 August 2001 Figueira, Arraial do Cabo—RJ — — Siciliano & Franco, 2005
A. australis 11 June 2006 Praia do Arpoador—RJ — — This study
A. australis 20 July 2000 Praia de Sa˜o Conrado—RJ C 92 This study
A. australis 18 September 2000 Praia da Urca, Rio de Janeiro city—RJ C 120 This study
A. tropicalis 12 August 1997 Ferradurinha, Bu´zios—RJ — — This study
A. tropicalis 7 September 2008 Itaipu, Nitero´i—RJ — — This study
A. tropicalis 6 September 2008 Barra da Tijuca—RJ F — This study
A. tropicalis 15 July 1994 Praia Seca, Araruama—RJ F 160 Moura & Siciliano, 2007
A. tropicalis 7 October 1999 Pedra de Guaratiba—RJ F 160 Moura & Siciliano, 2007
A. tropicalis 6 August 2000 Praia Vermelha, Urca—RJ F 170 Moura & Siciliano, 2007
A. tropicalis 8 August 2000 Camboinhas, Nitero´i—RJ — — Moura & Siciliano, 2007
A. tropicalis 8 August 2000 Figueira, Arraial do Cabo—RJ C 82 Moura & Siciliano, 2007 A. tropicalis 28 September 2000 Praia˜o, Barra de Sa˜o Joa˜o—RJ — — Moura & Siciliano, 2007
A. tropicalis 9 July 2002 Itaipu, Nitero´i—RJ — 80 Moura & Siciliano, 2007
A. tropicalis 9 July 2002 Itaipu, Nitero´i—RJ F 160 Moura & Siciliano, 2007
A. tropicalis 14 July 2002 Recreio—RJ — — Moura & Siciliano, 2007
A. tropicalis 11 August 2002 Barra da Tijuca—RJ F 170 Moura & Siciliano, 2007
A. tropicalis 18 August 2002 Itacoatiara, Nitero´i—RJ F 160 Moura & Siciliano, 2007
A. tropicalis 11 September 2002 Ilha do Farol, Arraial do Cabo—RJ F 93 Moura & Siciliano, 2007 A. tropicalis 16 August 2003 Prainha, Arraial do Cabo—RJ F 170 Moura & Siciliano, 2007
A. tropicalis 30 August 1984 Bu´zios—RJ F — Siciliano & Lodi, 1986
A. tropicalis 26 September 2003 Itau´na, Saquarema—RJ F 120 Moura & Siciliano, 2007
A. tropicalis 10 October 2005 Recreio—RJ — — Moura & Siciliano, 2007
A. tropicalis 6 May 2006 Praia Grande, Arraial do Cabo—RJ C 160 Moura & Siciliano, 2007
A. tropicalis 7 August 2006 Jacone´, Marica´—RJ — — Moura & Siciliano, 2007
A. tropicalis 26 September 2006 Unamar, Cabo Frio—RJ F 145 Moura & Siciliano, 2007
A. tropicalis 28 September 1994 Ac¸u, Sa˜o Joa˜o da Barra—RJ — — Siciliano & Franco, 2005
A. tropicalis 10 August 1994 Piratininga, Nitero´i—RJ — — Siciliano & Franco, 2005
A. tropicalis Winter 1987 Beaches of Rio de Janeiro city –RJ F — Siciliano & Lodi, 1989 A. tropicalis Winter 1988 Beaches of Rio de Janeiro city—RJ F — Siciliano & Lodi, 1989 A. tropicalis Winter 1988 Beaches of Rio de Janeiro city—RJ F — Siciliano & Lodi, 1989
H. leptonyx 5 July 2007 Angra dos Reis—RJ — 190 This study
H. leptonyx 23 August 2006 Barra da Tijuca—RJ F 315 This study
H. leptonyx 5 August 1989 Atafona, Sa˜o Joa˜o da Barra —RJ — — Rosas et al., 1992
L. carcinophaga 12 May 2003 Foz Rio Cac¸a˜o, south Rio de Janeiro —RJ C 212 Lodi et al., 2005
L. carcinophaga 16 August 2007 Praia de Laranjeiras, Paraty—RJ — — This study
L. carcinophaga — Recreio—RJ — — Vaz-Ferreira, 1965
L. carcinophaga 1987– 1989 Piratininga, Nitero´i— RJ — — Siciliano & Lodi, 1989
M. leonina November 1954 Barra da Tijuca—RJ — — Carvalho, 1975
M. leonina August 1958 Saquarema—RJ — — Carvalho, 1975
M. leonina August 1958 Marica´—RJ — — Carvalho, 1975
M. leonina August 1988 Barra de Guaratiba—RJ — 200 Siciliano & Lodi, 1989
M. leonina 15 March 1994 Ilha de Paqueta´—RJ F 270 Magalha˜es et al., 2003
M. leonina 23 June 1999 Praia de Joa˜o Fernandes, Bu´zios—RJ F 320 Magalha˜es et al., 2003
M. leonina September 2001 Prainha, Arraial do Cabo— RJ F 280 Magalha˜es et al., 2003
M. leonina 29 July 2002 Praia Grande, Arraial do Cabo—RJ F 340 Moura et al., 2010
M. leonina 25 July 2003 Praia Grande, Arraial do Cabo—RJ F 400 Moura et al., 2010
M. leonina 4 February 2005 Ilha de Santana, Macae´—RJ — 300 Moura et al., 2010
M. leonina 31 August 2008 Baı´a de Sepetiba—RJ C 230 Moura et al., 2010
O. flavescens 14 January 2006 Praia da Ferradura, Buzios—RJ C 180 This study
O. flavescens 24 December 1975 Macae´—RJ F — Pinedo, 1990
O. flavescens — Praia Vermelha, Urca—RJ — — Carvalho, 1975
For full species names see text; BL, body length.
and early spring visitors. Most of these are young seals from three to five years old.
Animals of different ages are believed to segregate by areas (Laws, 1957; Hofman et al., 1977; King, 1983). Segregation by sex is also suggested to influence the dispersal capability of H. leptonyx to the south-west Atlantic, where most seals found are male (Rodrı´gues et al., 2003), as with the only sexed leopard seal presented in this paper (Table 2).
The cyclic occurrences of leopard seals in sub-Antarctic islands are suggested to be periodic dispersal, rather than a
migratory pattern (Rounsevell & Eberhard, 1980). The north-ward dispersal pattern of this seal species is more related to the food available, principally the abundance of krill. Despite that adult leopard seals can predate on different prey species (e.g. fish, crustaceans, squid, penguin and seals) young leopard seals are heavily dependent on krill, because of their lack of ability to catch large prey. Young leopard seals may be forced to disperse northward to search for prey due to their incapability to compete for food with adults in Antarctic regions.
The occurrence of vagrants in temperate and tropical regions of the south-west Atlantic during winter and spring is associated with the northward movements of young seals from the Antarctic and sub-Antarctic regions. The MFC together with the northern movement of leopard seals search-ing for food could help the occurrences of vagrants on the coast of Brazil, even in tropical regions such as on the coast of Rio de Janeiro State (Rodrı´guez et al., 2003).
Crabeater seal
The crabeater seal (Lobodon carcinophaga) is a gregarious cir-cumpolar and pelagic phocid species distributed in the Antarctic region on drifting pack ice (King, 1983; Adam, 2005). This is the most abundant species of pinniped in the world (Jefferson et al., 1993). Despite an extreme variation in the estimated global density of L. carcinophaga, ranging from two to 75 millions according to Bengson (2002), an
Fig. 2.Some photographs from the new records of pinnipeds on the coast of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, presented in this paper. (A) Leopard seal (Hydrurga leptonyx) found on the coast of Angra dos Reis, on 5 July 2007; (B) male sub-Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus tropicalis) found in Barra da Tijuca, on 6 September 2008; (C) South American fur seal (Arctocephalus australis) found in Praia do Arpoador on 11 June 2006; (D) crabeater seal (Lobodon carcinophaga) found in Paraty, RJ, on 16 August 2007; (E): female South American sea lion (Otaria flavescens) found in Praia da Ferradura, Bu´zios, on 14 January 2006.
Fig. 3. Frequency of occurrence of all pinnipeds, Arctocephalus tropicalis and Mirounga leonina reported for the Rio de Janeiro coast during the seasons.
estimation of 10 to 15 million is more currently accepted (Oliveira et al., 2006).
The latitudinal movement of the crabeater seal is associated with the seasonal configuration of the pack ice. Its northward movement coincides with the winter extension of the pack ice, and it can move further south during summer as the ice breaks up. These phocids are abundant in Antarctic coastal waters, principally on the west coast of Graham Land and in the southern Ross Sea, where its sudden influx is characteristically semi-migratory (King, 1983).
Vagrants have occurred on the coast of South Africa, Heard Island, Australia, New Zealand and South America (King, 1983). Here we added one new record on the coast of Rio de Janeiro State (Table 2), which represents the northernmost location of the occurrences of L. carcinophaga in the western South Atlantic (Oliveira et al., 2006).
Few crabeater seals have been reported for the Brazilian coast and most records have occurred during austral summer and autumn, as well as in winter months (Oliveira et al., 2006). The only two records with available period of occurrence were reported during May and August (Table 2). On the coast of Chile this species occurs during winter (Olrog, 1950), and in Argentina the occurrence of crabeater seals has been reported during austral summer (Scolaro, 1976; Goodall & Schiavini, 1987).
Between 1968 and 1975 Ross et al. (1976) reported nine strandings of L. carcinophaga on the South Africa coast. The total body length of these vagrants (1.6– 1.9 m) showed that they were probably pups of the previous year, with about four to six months of age. Despite the auxiliary propulsion northward promoted by the West Wind Drift (WWD), those crabeater seals would have to swim intensively to reach the coast of South Africa. The majority of the young seals stranded in the austral summer (December – March). This period coincides with the time when the bulk of the cra-beater population would be moving southward with the break up of the winter ice cover (Ross et al., 1976). King (1983) described seven strandings of L. carcinophaga in the Australian coast between January and September, although half of the records occurred during winter.
Although rarely reported in Rio de Janeiro, as well as on the Brazilian coast, L. carcinophaga records in the area are prob-ably linked to the post-reproductive dispersal pattern of adult seals influenced by the WWD and MFC (Pinedo, 1990; Oliveira et al., 2006), as is believed to occur with the vagrants reported on the Africa and South America coasts (Castello & Pinedo, 1977).
Southern elephant seal
The southern elephant seal (Mirounga leonina) has a widely circumpolar distribution and breeding sites near the sub-Antarctic convergence. There are several small breeding groups of this large seal in sub-Antarctic islands, however the most abundant group is located in South Georgia (South Atlantic Ocean—54817′S 36842′W), Kerguelen – Heard (South Indian Ocean—49821′S 70812′E) and Macquarie Islands (South Pacific Ocean—54830′S 158857′E) (Reeves et al., 2002). In addition, in South America exists a genetically distinct small population at Peninsula Valde´s, Argentina (Slade et al., 1998; Hoelzel et al., 2001). Southern elephant seals breed in the austral spring, from early September to mid-November, and they spend most time of the year at sea
(Le Boeuf & Laws, 1994). The global population of M. leonina is estimated between 664,000 and 740,000 animals distributed in 14 breeding stocks (McMahon et al., 2005). Vagrant southern elephant seals have been recorded in several locations far from their traditional breeding sites (Pinedo et al., 1992; Reeves et al., 2002). Their unexpected presence has been reported on the coast of central Chile, South Africa, New Zealand, Tasmania, Australia and Angola (Reeves et al., 2002). In Brazilian waters, this species has been occasionally recorded in Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, Parana´, Sa˜o Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Bahia, Sergipe and Fernando de Noronha Island (Lodi & Siciliano, 1989; Pinedo, 1990; Pinedo et al., 1992; Simo˜es-Lopes et al., 1995; Magalha˜es et al., 2003; Bastos et al., 2006; Moura et al., 2010). Recently Moura et al. (2010) reviewed the occurrence of M. leonina on the Brazilian coast. These authors compiled 46 records from 1954 to 2008. Twenty-one per cent of the southern elephant seals occurred along the coast of Rio de Janeiro State.
Most occurrences of southern elephant seals on the South America coast are composed of sexually immature females (Lewis et al., 2006; Moura et al., 2010). Our data based on a review of records of this species in Rio de Janeiro State support this trend.
In our study, M. leonina was the second most common pinniped recorded in Rio de Janeiro State, and most of them occurred during winter. A similar seasonal trend was noted by Moura et al. (2010) who found most of the southern ele-phant seals during autumn and winter on the Brazilian coast. This seasonal pattern of occurrence suggests that the intrusion of the MFC, stronger in winter, could have an important role in the dispersal of the specimens found along the coast of South America, such as Rio de Janeiro State (Castello & Pinedo, 1977; Oliveira et al., 2001; Magalha˜es et al., 2003; Moura et al., 2010). As postulated by Magalha˜es et al. (2003) and Moura et al. (2010), one of the main reasons for the erratic movements of southern elephant seals could be attributed to the population growth of some colonies. Indeed, the continental colony of the species located in Peninsula Valde´s has shown clear evidence of growth and could be the locality for the majority of seals presented in this paper (Bastida & Rodrı´guez, 2003).
The potential ability to swim long distances together with the lack of physical barriers and MFC currents moving north-wards may help the dispersion of these seals to different locations along the Brazilian coast.
South American fur seal
The South American fur seal (Arctocephalus australis) is dis-tributed on both the Atlantic and Pacific coasts and offshore islands of South America, from Uruguay to Peru (King, 1983; Pinedo et al., 1992). Most of the entire population is concentrated in the Atlantic side of the distribution, especially in Uruguay where 300,000 specimens have been estimated (Pa´ez, 1999). Despite that there are no established breeding colonies of A. australis on the Brazilian coast, every year several dozens of young fur seals have been recorded during austral autumn and spring months, principally in the southern region of Brazil (Simo˜es-Lopes et al., 1995; Oliveira et al., 2001). In addition, there are two areas where otariid seals haul-out in Rio Grande do Sul State: Molhe Leste, 32810′S 52806′W and Ilha dos Lobos, 29820′S 49843′W (Rosas
et al., 1994). Some occurrences of South American fur seals have been recorded in other localities along the Brazilian coast, such as Sa˜o Paulo and Rio de Janeiro State (Pinedo et al., 1992). Oliveira (1999), based on data recovered during beach surveys recorded several hundred live and dead South American fur seals along the coast of Rio Grande do Sul. According to this author, most specimens recorded are yearlings of both sexes and adult males.
As this species breed in temperate zones of western South America, and even haul-out in southern Brazil, it was expected that this seal could be one of the most common in lower latitudes of this country. In contrast, only six records of A. australis were found up to date on the Rio de Janeiro coast, representing 1.1% of all pinnipeds and 16.2% of the otariids. On the coast of Rio Grande do Sul State (southern Brazil) this species represented 64.2% (N ¼ 79) of the otariids recorded from 1984 – 1993 and most of them were sexually immature males (Simo˜es-Lopes et al., 1995). Even pregnant females have been recorded in southern Brazil (Muelbert & Oliveira, 2006).
Five out of six records of A. australis on the Rio de Janeiro State coast occurred during winter. In southern Brazil most South American fur seals occur during winter and spring months (Pinedo, 1990; Simo˜es-Lopes et al., 1995; Muelbert & Oliveira, 2006) and their occurrence has been attributed to the northward foraging movement after they depart from breeding colonies in Uruguay (Muelbert & Oliveira, 2006).
South American sea lion
The Southern American sea lion (Otaria flavescens) is distributed from southern Brazil to southern Argentina along the Atlantic Ocean, and around the Chilean and Peruvian coasts along the Pacific Ocean (King, 1983; Bastida & Rodrı´guez, 2003). Despite that there are no established reproductive sites on the Brazilian coast O. flavescens is the second most common species of pinniped in the southern region; however, it is rarely observed on the coast of Rio de Janeiro, where only four speci-mens, representing 7.2% of records, were reported (Table 2). It is believed that the origin of the southern sea lions that inhabit the Brazilian coast is the breeding colonies from Uruguay, where there are about 12,000 seals (Pa´ez, 2006). Most occur-rences of sea lions in southern Brazil have been reported from September to November during their non-breeding distribution. Two records with available information on stranding times in the Rio de Janeiro State occurred in later spring and early summer (Table 2). According to Castello & Pinedo (1977) and Rosas et al. (1994) the northern dispersion pattern of O. flaves-cens is related to suitable prey in southern Brazilian waters. This dispersion occurs principally with adult and sub-adult males which could travel long distances far from the breeding colonies. The foraging activities near the breeding ground could result in a collapse through the competition for food, prin-cipally for females and juveniles that need to forage and store energy to maintain their parental care (Rosas et al., 1994). However, females may also disperse long distances to forage as observed with a sexually mature female on Ferradura beach (Bu´zios, Rio de Janeiro). It was a healthy specimen that remained for seven days foraging and resting consecutively.
Only a small percentage of the southern sea lions recorded in the Rio Grande do Sul State are females. In contrast one adult female was observed in Bu´zios, Rio de Janeiro (Table 2).
According to Pinedo & Barros (1983) and Oliveira et al. (2008), southern sea lions in southern Brazil feed mainly on demersal fish of the family Scianidae (e.g. Paralonchurus brasi-liensis, Macrodon ancylodon, Cynoscion striatus and Micropogonias furnieri) and Trichiuridae (Trichiurus lepturus). The majority of these fish are commercially exploited generating competition between fishermen and seals and pro-moting an important risk for the seals (Rosas, 1989).
Sub-Antarctic fur seal
The sub-Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus tropicalis) are widely distributed in the southern hemisphere. They breed on many sub-Antarctic Islands, north of the Antarctic conver-gence (Jefferson et al., 1993) including Gough/Tristan da Cunha (40820′S 09854′E), Prince Edward/Marion (46838′S 37857′E), Amsterdam/St Paul (37850′S 77831′E), Crozet (45857′S 50833′E) and Macquarie Islands (54830′S 158857′E) (Bester, 1987; Pinedo et al., 1992). The northern limit of the species range is not well known, but vagrants have appeared in South Africa (Shaughnessy & Ross, 1980), Argentina (Bastida et al., 1999; Bastida & Rodriguez, 2003), Brazil (Pinedo, 1990), Australia and New Zealand (Taylor, 1990) and Juan Fernandez Islands, Chile (Torres & Aguayo, 1984). In Brazil, A. tropicalis has been recorded in the States of Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, Parana´, Sa˜o Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Bahia Sergipe and Alagoas (Castello & Pinedo, 1977; Ximenez, 1980; Neves et al., 1990; Simo˜es-Lopes et al., 1995; Velozo, 2007; Souto et al., 2009; Velozo et al., 2009).
Sub-Antarctic fur seals pup and breed from late October to early January, with a peak in mid-December. Seals also come ashore for the annual moult between February and April, with a peak in March and April (Jefferson et al., 1993).
As A. tropicalis inhabits sub-Antarctic islands it was unex-pected that this seal represents 49.1% of all seals and 75% of the otarids found in the Rio de Janeiro State. In southern Brazil it represents 26.8% of the otarids reported, and 64.2% of the family is composed of A. australis (Simo˜es-Lopes et al., 1995). Most individuals reported were sexually immature males. The same pattern of occurrence was recently observed by Moura & Siciliano (2007) that presented 18 records of sub-Antarctic fur seals on the coast of Rio de Janeiro.
Ninety per cent of the specimens occurred during winter on the coast of Rio de Janeiro State. The same seasonal pattern is observed in southern Brazil, where most seals occur from June to October (Simo˜es-Lopes et al., 1995). In South Africa the occurrence of A. tropicalis is also seasonal and most records occur between May and September (Shaughnessy & Ross, 1980).
Most of the records made along the Brazilian coast have been suggested to be attributed to the favourable influence of the cold MFC which flows northward and is more intensive during winter, similar to other pinnipeds (Castello & Pinedo, 1977; Pinedo, 1992, Simo˜es-Lopes et al., 1995; Moura & Siciliano, 2007). Nevertheless, Oliveira (1999) suggested that the fur seals found on the southern Brazilian coast could be vagrant individuals from Gough or Tristan da Cunha, aided by the South Atlantic Anticyclonic System, which in turn comprises the Antarctic Circumpolar, Benguela and Brazil Currents. The records of A. tropicalis along the north-eastern and south-eastern Brazil coasts have also been attributed to the passive transport of the Benguela Current, as suggested by Ximenez (1980) for the coast of Alagoas State, Velozo
et al. (2009) for the coasts of Sergipe and Bahia States, and also Moura & Siciliano (2007) who also postulated this hypothesis for the occurrences of sub-Antarctic fur seals in the Rio de Janeiro State.
A recent genetic study comparing the A. tropicalis found on the Brazilian coast with animals from the main breeding colonies of this species indicated that despite the majority of the vagrants being from Gough Islands (40820′S 09854′E), they could also come from other reproductive colonies (Ferreira et al., 2008). In addition, one vagrant seal which presented a DNA sequence matching an exclusive haplotype from the Crozet Islands (45895′S 50833′E), probably moved west with assistance of the West Wind Drift, around the Antarctic and MFC, reaching the Brazilian coast after covering a distance of about 16,500 km. Following the cessation of intensive exploitation, popu-lations have increased, often dramatically, and many islands have been recolonized by the species (SCAR, 1992). The records presented here suggest that the population increase in many breeding sites together and the auxiliary propulsion pro-moted by the Malvinas/Falklands or Benguela Currents could result in new extra limital records of A. tropicalis along the South America coast, including low latitudinal places, such as the south-eastern and north-eastern Brazilian coast.
A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T S
The authors would like to thank the researchers who contributed with records presented in this paper. Thanks go to the research team of GEMM–Lagos. We also thank the fishermen and life-guards from Cabo Frio, Saquarema and Bu´zios for their contri-bution with important information on pinniped records. J.F. Moura is supported by Fundac¸a˜o Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) and is a PhD student of the Escola Nacional de Sau´de Pu´blica Se´rgio Arouca (ENSP–FIOCRUZ). S. Siciliano is supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientı´fico e Tecnolo´gico (CNPq) (Processo no. 301544/2008-5). We also thank the two anonymous referees who provided constructive comments to this article.
R E F E R E N C E S
Adam P.J.(2005) Lobodon carcinophaga. Mammalian Species 772, 1 –14. Antas P.T.Z. (1991) Status and conservation of seabirds breeding in Brazilian waters. In Croxall J.P. (ed.) Seabird status and conservation: a supplement. Cambridge: Page Bros, International Council for Bird Preservation Technical Publication No. 11, pp. 141– 158.
Bakun A. and Parrish R.H.(1990) Comparative studies of coastal pelagic fish reproductive habitats: the Brazilian sardine (Sardinella aurita). ICES Journal of Marine Science 46, 269– 283.
Bakun A. and Parrish R.H.(1991) Comparative studies of coastal pelagic fish reproductive habitats: the anchovy (Engraulis anchoita) of the southwestern Atlantic. ICES Journal of Marine Science 48, 343– 361. Bastida R. and Rodrı´guez D.(2003) Mamı´feros marinos de Patagonia y
Antartida. Buenos Aires: Vazquez Mazzini.
Bastida R., Loureiro J., Quse V., Bernardelli A., Rodrı´guez D. and Costa E.(1999) Tuberculosis in a wild sub-Antarctic fur seal from Argentina. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 35, 796– 798.
Bastos B.L., Norberto G.O., Maia-Nogueira R. and Guimara˜es J.E. (2006) Avaliac¸a˜o hematolo´gica e dosagem bioquı´mica de ALT, AST e creatinina em elefante-marinho-do-sul, Mirounga leonina
(Linnaeus, 1758), encontrado no litoral de Salvador, Bahia. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science 43, 18 – 23. Bengson J.L. (2002) Crabeater seal, Lobodon carcinophaga. In Perrin
W.F., Wu¨rsig B. and Thewissen J.G.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of marine mammals. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 302– 304.
Bester M.N. (1981) Fur seals Arctocephalus gazelle and leopard seals Hydrurga leptonyx at the Coubert Peninsula, Kerguelen. South African Journal of Antarctic Research 10/11, 35 – 37.
Bester M.N. (1987) Sub-Antarctic fur seal Arctocephalus tropicalis at Gough Island (Tristan da Cunha Group). In Croxall J.P. and Gentry R.L. (eds) Status, biology and ecology of fur seals. Washington, DC: NOAA Technical Report NMFS 51, pp. 57 – 60.
Blanc A., Ruchansky D., Clara M., Achaval F., Le Bas A. and Arbiza J. (2009) Serologic evidence of influenza A and B viruses in South American fur seals (Arctocephalus australis). Journal of Wildlife Diseases 45, 519 – 521.
Bowen W.D., Beck C.A. and Austin D.A.(2009) Pinniped ecology. In Perrin W.F., Wu¨rsig B. and Thewissen J.G.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of marine mammals. 2nd edition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 852– 861.
Campos E.J.D., Velhote D. and da Silveira I.C.A.(2000) Shelf break upwelling driven by Brazil Current cyclonic meanders. Geophysical Research Letters 27, 751 –754.
Carvalho C.T. (1975) Ocorreˆncia de mamı´feros marinhos no Brasil. Boletim Te´cnico do Instituto Florestal 16, 13 – 32.
Castello H.P. and Pinedo M.C.(1977) Os visitantes ocasionais de nosso litoral. Natureza em Revista 3, 40 – 46.
Castello J.P.(1990) Synopsis on the reproductive biology and early life history of Engraulis anchoita and related environmental conditions in Brazilian waters. In Second IOC Workshop on Sardine/Anchovy Recruitment Project (SARP) in the Southwest Atlantic. IOC Workshop REP UNESCO, Paris, Volume 65, No. 7, Annex VII. Castilho P.V., Simo˜es-Lopes P.C. and De Masi M.A.N.(1998) Estudo da
utilizac¸a˜o de mamı´feros aqua´ticos por populac¸o˜es pre´-histo´ricas da Ilha de Santa Catarina/SC. Sul do Brasil. In 8aReunia˜o de Trabalho
de Especialistas em Mamı´feros Aqua´ticos da Ame´rica do Sul, 25 – 29 October 1998. Olinda, Pernambuco, Brazil, p. 47.
Castro B.M. and Miranda L.B. (1998) Physical oceanography of the western Atlantic continental shelf located between 48N and 348S. In Robinson A.R. and Brink K.H. (eds) The sea, Volume 11. New York: Wiley, pp. 209– 251.
Chelton D.B., Schlax M.G., Witter D.L. and Richman J.G. (1990) GEOSAT altimeter observations of the surface circulation of the Southern Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research 95, 17877– 17903. Cowan D.F., House C. and House J.A.(2001) Public health. In Dierauf
L.A. and Gulland F.M.D. (eds) CRC handbook of marine mammal medicine. 2nd edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 767– 778. Drehmer C.J. and Ribeiro A.M.(1998) A temporal bone of an Otariidae
(Mammalia, Pinnipedia) from the late Pleistocene of Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Geocieˆncias 3, 39 – 44.
Emilsson I. (1961) The shelf and coastal waters off southern Brazil. Boletim do Instituto Oceanogra´fico USP 11, 101– 112.
Ferreira J.M., Oliveira L.R., Wynen L., Bester M.N., Guinet C., Moraes-Barros N., Martins F.M., Muelbert M.M.C., Moreno I.B., Siciliano S., Ott P.H. and Morgante J.S.(2008) Multiple origins of vagrant sub-Antarctic fur seals: a long journey to the Brazilian coast detected by molecular markers. Polar Biology 31, 303– 308, doi: 10.1007/s00300-007-0358-z.
Geraci J.R. and Ridgway S.H.(1991) On disease transmission between cetaceans and humans. Marine Mammal Science 7, 191– 194.
Geraci J.R. and Lounsbury V.J.(2005) Marine mammals ashore: a field guide for strandings. 2nd edition. Baltimore, MD: National Aquarium in Baltimore Publication.
Goodall R.N.P. and Schiavini A.C.M.(1987) Focas Antarcticas halladas en las costas de Tierra del Fuego. In Abstract: Segunda Reunia˜o de Trabalho de Especialistas em Mamı´feros Aqua´ticos da Ame´rica do Sul. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp. 57 – 59.
Gordon A.L. (1981) South Atlantic thermocline ventilation. Deep-Sea Research Part A 28, 1239– 1264.
Gwynn A.M.(1953) The status of the leopard seal at Heard Island and Macquarie Island 1948– 50. Australian National Antarctic Research Expedition (ANARE). Interim Report 3, 1 –33.
Haimovici M. and Perez A.A. (1991) Coastal cephalopod fauna of southern Brazil. Bulletin of Marine Science 49, 221– 230.
Hamilton J.E.(1934) The southern sea lion Otaria byronia (de Blainville). Discovery Reports 8, 269 –318.
Hoelzel A.R., Campagna C. and Arnbom T.(2001) Genetic and mor-phometric differentiation between island and mainland southern ele-phant seal populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences 268, 325 –332.
Hofman R., Reichle R., Siniff D.B. and Muller-Schwarze D.(1977) The leopard seal (Hydrurga leptonyx) at Palmer Station. In Liano G. (ed.) Adaptations within Antarctic ecosystems. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 769– 782.
Jefferson T.A., Leatherwood S. and Webber M.A. (1993) Marine mammals of the world: FAO species identification guide. Rome: UNEP/FAO Press.
King J.E.(1983) Seals of the world. 2nd edition. London: British Museum (Natural History) and Cornell University Press.
Laws R.M.(1957) On the growth rates of the leopard seal (Hydrurga lep-tonyx de Blainville). Sonderdruck aus Saugetierkundliche Mitteilungen 5, 49 – 55.
Le Boeuf B.J. and Laws R.M.(1994) Elephant seals: an introduction to the genus. In Le Boeuf B.J. and Laws R.M. (eds) Elephant seals: population ecology, behavior, and physiology. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, pp. 1 – 26.
Lewis M., Campagna C., Marin M.R. and Fernandez T.(2006) Southern elephant seals north of the Antarctic Polar Front. Antarctic Science 18, 213– 221.
Lodi L. and Siciliano S.(1989) A southern elephant seal in Brazil. Marine Mammal Science 5, 313.
Lodi L., Mayerhofer L.C., Farias Ju´nior S.G. and Cruz F.S.(2005) Nota sobre a ocorreˆncia de foca caranguejeira, Lobodon carcinophagus (Hombron and Jacquinot, 1842) (Mammalia: Pinnipedia), no estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Biotemas 18, 151– 161.
Magalha˜es F.A., Hassel L.B., Venturotti A.C. and Siciliano S.(2003) Southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina) on the coast of Rio de Janeiro State. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals 2, 55 –56. Matsuura Y.(1986) Contribuic¸a˜o ao estudo sobre estrutura oceanogra´fica da regia˜o sudeste entre Cabo Frı´o (RJ) e Cabo de Santa Marta Grande (SC). Cieˆncia e Cultura 38, 1439– 1450.
Matsuura Y. (1996) A probable cause of recruitment failure of the Brazilian sardine Sardinella aurita population during 1974/75 spawn-ing season. South African Journal of Marine Science 17, 29 – 35. McMahon C., Bester M.N., Burton H.R., Hindell M. and Bradshaw
C.A. (2005) Population status, trends and a re-examination of the hypotheses explaining the recent declines of the southern elephant seal Mirounga leonina. Mammal Review 35, 82– 100.
Moura J.F. and Siciliano S. (2007) Straggler sub-Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus tropicalis) on the coast of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals 6, 103– 107.
Moura J.F., Di Dario B.P., Lima L.M. and Siciliano S.(2010) Southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina) along the Brazilian coast: review and additional records. Marine Biodiversity Records 3, doi:10.1017/ S1755267209991138
Muelbert M.M.C. and Oliveira L.R.(2006) First records of stranded pregnant female South American fur seals, Arctocephalus australis, in the southern Brazilian coast. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals 5, 67 – 68.
Neves M.L.C., Reis M.S.S. and Brasileiro M.T.R.(1990) Sobre a ocorreˆn-cia de Arctocephalus tropicalis (Gray, 1872) na baı´a de Todos os Santos, Bahia, Brasil (Mammalia, Arctocephalinae). In Abstracts: 4a Reunio´n de Trabajo de Especialistas em Mamı´feros Acua´ticos de Ame´rica Del Sur, 12 –15 November 1990, Valdivia, Chile, p. 47. Oliveira E.V. and Drehmer C.J. (1997) Sobre alguns restos de
Pinnipedia – Otariidae (Mammalia, Carnivora) do Quartena´rio do estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Geocieˆncias 2, 19 – 22. Oliveira L.R. (1999) Caracterizac¸a˜o dos padro˜es de ocorreˆncias de
pinı´pedes (Carnivora, Pinnipedia) ocorrentes no litoral norte do estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, entre abril de 1993 e dezembro de 1998. Master’s dissertation. Pontifı´cia Universidade Cato´lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Oliveira L.R., Danilewicz D., Martins M.B., Ott P.H., Moreno I.B. and Caon G.(2001) New records of the Antarctic fur seal, Arctocephalus gazella (Peters, 1875) to the Brazilian coast. Comunicac¸o˜es do Museu de Cieˆncias e Tecnologia da PUCRS, Se´rie Zoologia 14, 201– 207. Oliveira L.R., Machado R., Alievi M.M. and Wu¨rdig N.L. (2006)
Crabeater seal (Lobodon carcinophaga) on the coast of Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals 5, 145– 148.
Oliveira L.R., Ott P.H. and Malabarba L.R.(2008) Ecologia alimentar dos pinı´pedes do sul do Brasil e uma avaliac¸a˜o de suas interac¸o˜es com atividades pesqueiras. In Reis N.R., Peracchi A.L. and Santos G.A.S.D. (eds) Ecologia de mamı´feros. Londrina: Technical Books Editora, pp. 93 – 109.
Olrog C.C.(1950) Mamı´feros y aves del archipie´lago de Cabo de Hornos. Acta Zoologica Lilloana 9, 505 – 532.
Pa´ez E.(1999) Bootstrap and power analysis utilization in abundance of Arctocephalus australis pups. In Rey M., Amestoy F. and Arena G. (eds) Synopsis on the biology and ecology of South American fur seals and southern sea lions of Uruguay. Guidelines to their management and administration. Montevideo: INADE/UNEP/MGAP/URU, pp. 55 – 74.
Pa´ez H.(2006) Situacio´n de la administracio´n del recurso lobos y leones marinos en Uruguay. In Menafra R., Gallgo L.R., Scarabina F. and Conde D. (eds) Bases para la conservacio´n y el manejo de la costa uru-guaya. Montevideo: Vida Silvestre, pp. 1 – 668.
Palma E., Matano R.P. and Piola A.P.(2004) A numerical study of the Southwestern Atlantic Shelf circulation: barotropic response to tidal and wind forcing. Journal of Geophysical Research 109, doi:10.1029/ 2004JC002315
Pinedo M.C.(1990) Ocorreˆncia de pinı´pedes na costa brasileira. Garcia de Orta, Se´rie Zoolo´gica 15, 37 – 48.
Pinedo M.C., Rosas F.C. and Marmontel M.(1992) Ceta´ceos e Pinı´pedes do Brasil: uma revisa˜o dos registros e guia para identificac¸a˜o das espe´-cies. Manaus: UNEP/FUA Press.
Pinedo M.C. and Barros N.(1983) Ana´lise dos conteu´dos estomacais do lea˜o marinho Otaria flavescens e do lobo-marinho Arctocephalus aus-tralis na costa do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. In Abstracts: Simpo´sio
Latinoamericano sobre Oceanografia Biolo´gica, 28 November– 02 December, 1983, Montevideo, Uruguay, p. 25.
Reeves R.R., Stewart B.S. and Leatherwood S.(1992) The Sierra Club handbook of seals and sirenians. San Francisco, CA: The Sierra Club Books.
Reeves R.R., Stewart B.S., Clapham P.J. and Powell J.A.(2002) Guide to the marine mammals of the world. New York: National Audobon Society Press.
Riedman M.(1990) Evolution, classification, and distribution of pinni-peds. In The pinnipeds: seals, sea lions, and walruses. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 74 – 81.
Rodrı´guez D., Bastida R., Moro´n S., Heredia S.R. and Loureiro J.(2003) Occurrence of leopard seals in northern Argentina. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals 2, 47 – 50.
Rodrigues P.H., Prevosti F.J., Ferigolo J. and Ribeiro A.M. (2004) Novos materiais de Carnivora para o Pleistoceno do estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia 7, 77 – 86. Rosas F.C.W.(1989) Aspectos da dinaˆmica populacional e Interac¸o˜es com
a pesca, do lea˜o-marinho do Sul, Otaria flavescens (Shaw, 1800) (Pinnipedia, Otariidae), no litoral sul do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Rio Grande. Master’s dissertation. Fundac¸a˜o Universidade de Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Rosas F.C.W., Capistrano L.C., Di Beneditto A.P. and Ramos R.(1992) Hydrurga leptonyx recovered from the stomach of a tiger shark cap-tured off the Rio de Janeiro coast, Brazil. Mammalia 56, 153– 155. Rosas F.C.W., Pinedo M.C., Marmontel M. and Haimovici M.(1994)
Seasonal movements of the South American sea lion (Otaria flaves-cens, Shaw) of the Rio Grande do Sul coast, Brazil. Mammalia 58, 51 – 59.
Ross G.J.B., Ryan F., Saayman G.S. and Skinner J.(1976) Observations on two captive crabeater seals at the Port Elizabeth oceanarium. International Zoo Yearbook 16, 160 – 164.
Rounsevell D. and Eberhard I.(1980) Leopard seals, Hydrurga leptonyx (Pinnipedia), at Macquarie Island from 1949 to 1979. Australian Wildlife Research 7, 403– 415.
Saraceno M.C., Provost A. and Piola R. (2005) On the relationship between satellite-retrieved surface temperature fronts and chlorophyll a in the western South Atlantic. Journal of Geophysical Research 110, doi:10.1029/2004JC002736
SCAR(1992) Report on the meeting of the SCAR group of specialists on seals. International Council of Scientific Unions, Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, Bariloche, Argentina.
Scolaro J.A.(1976) Nota sobre uma foca cangrejera (Lobodon carcinopha-gus) capturada em Puerto Madryn, Chubut (Phocidae, Pinnipedia). Neotropica 22, 117– 119.
SCS (2001) Pinniped species information. Seals Conservation Society. http://www.pinnipeds.org/species/species.htm (accessed 30 November 2009).
Shaughnessy P.D. and Ross G.J.B.(1980) Records of the sub-Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus tropicalis) from South Africa with notes on its biology and some observations of captive animals. Annals of the South African Museum 82, 71 – 89.
Siciliano S. and Lodi L.(1986) Ocorreˆncias de Arctocephalus tropicalis (Gray, 1872) (Pinnipedia, Otariidae) para o litoral do Rio de Janeiro e Sa˜o Paulo. In Abstracts: 88 Congresso Brasileiro de Zoologia/ UFMG, Cuiaba´, Mato Grosso, Brazil, pp. 227.
Siciliano S. and Lodi L.(1989) Pinnipeds observed along the coast of Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil, 1987– 1989. In Abstracts: The Eighth Biennial Conference on the Biology of Marine Mammals, 7– 11 December 1989. California, USA, p. 62.
Siciliano S. and Franco S.M.S.(2005) Cata´logo da colec¸a˜o de mamı´feros aqua´ticos do Museu Nacional. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz/ENSP. Silva K.G.(2004) Os pinı´pedes no Brasil: ocorreˆncias, estimativas
popula-cionais e conservac¸a˜o. PhD thesis. Fundac¸a˜o Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Silva M.A., Brito C., Santos S.V. and Barreiros J.P.(2009) Historic and recent occurrences of pinnipeds in the Archipelago of the Azores. Mammalia 73, 60 – 62.
Simo˜es-Lopes P.C., Drehmer C.J. and Ott P.H.(1995) Nota sobre os Otariidae e Phocidae (Mammalia: Carnivora) da costa norte do Rio Grande do Sul e Santa Catarina. Biocieˆncias 3, 173 – 181.
Slade R.W., Moritz C., Hoelzel A.R. and Burton H.R.(1998) Molecular population genetics of the southern elephant seal Mirounga leonina. Genetics 149, 1945– 1957.
Souto L.R.A., Abra˜o-Oliveira J.G., Maia-Nogueira R. and Do´rea-Reis L.W. (2009) Interactions between sub-Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus tropicalis) and cookiecutter shark (Isistius plutodus) on the coast of Bahia, north-eastern Brazil. Marine Biodiversity Records 2, doi:10.1017/S1755267209000992
Taylor R.(1990) Records of sub-Antarctic fur seals in New Zealand. New Zealand. Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 24, 499– 502. Torres D. and Aguayo A.(1984) Presence of Arctocephalus tropicalis
(Gray 1872) at the Juan Ferna´ndez Archipelago, Chile. Acta Zoologica Fennica 172, 133– 134.
Valentin J.L.(2001) The Cabo Frı´o upwelling system, Brazil. In Seeliger U. and Kjerfve B. (eds) Coastal marine ecosystems of Latin America. Ecological Studies, Volume 144. Berlin: Springer, pp. 97 – 106. Vaz Ferreira R.(1965) Ecologı´a terrestre y marina de los pinnipedios del
Atla´ntico Sudoccidental. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Cieˆncias 37, 178– 191.
Vaz Ferreira R.(1984) La foca leopard Hydrurga leptonix (de Blainville, 1820) (Pinnipedia: Phocidae) en el Uruguay. Boletı´n de la Sociedad Zoologica del Uruguay 2, 18 – 21.
Velozo R.S. (2007) Encalhe de mamı´feros aqua´ticos entre a foz dos rios Pardo (BA) e Sa˜o Francisco (SE). Master’s dissertation. Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Bahia, Brazil.
Velozo R.A., Schiavetti A. and Do´rea-Reis L.W.(2009) Analysis of sub-Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus tropicalis) records in Bahia and Sergipe, north-eastern Brazil. Marine Biodiversity Records 2, doi:10.1017/S1755267209000980
Walker T.R., Boyd I.L., McCafferty D.J., Hun N., Taylor R.I. and Reid K.(1998) Seasonal occurrence and diet of leopard seals (Hydrurga lep-tonyx) at Bird Island, South Georgia. Antarctic Science 10, 75 – 81. Ximenez A.(1980) Sobre la presencia de Arctocephalus tropicalis (Gray,
1872) en el nordeste del Brasil (Mammalia, Arctocephalinae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 40, 591 – 592.
and
Ximenez A., Simo˜es-Lopez P.C. and Praderi R. (1987) Notas sobre mamı´feros marinhos de Santa Catarina e Rio Grande do Sul. In Abstracts: Anais da 2a. Reunia˜o de Trabalho de Especialistas em Mamı´feros Aqua´ticos da Ame´rica do Sul, 4 – 8 August, 1987, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 100– 103.
Correspondence should be addressed to: J.F. de Moura
Escola Nacional de Sau´de Pu´blica
ENSP/FIOCRUZ, Departamento de Endemias Rua Leopoldo Bulho˜es, 1480 – 68 Andar
Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21041-210, Brazil email: jailsonfm@gmail.com
