D
IVERSIFICATION THROUGHT
RADEFranceso Caselli Miklos Koren Milan Lisicky Silvana Tenreyro
January 2011
T
HREE DEVELOPMENTS IN THEW
ORLD ECONOMY1 Substantial decline in output volatility in developed countries
in majority of developing countries
2 Large and widespread increase in trade openness
emergence of new trading partners (e.g. China and India)
3 Fast transmission of the current crisis, with the near collapse of trade
T
HE"
ESTABLISHED"
VIEWOpenness to trade=⇒specialization=⇒increases volatility.
Implicit assumption: sector-specific shocks are the prevalent source of volatility.
But in volatility accounting, country-specific shocks (affecting all sectors) account for a large part of overall volatility.
Openness to trade may lead to sectoral specialization, but it may also help diversify country-specific shocks (both on demand and supply sides).
A
N INTUITION FOR A LINKIncreased trade openness brings about a larger pool of potential suppliers of input, and thus the potential for diversification of cost shocks.
the larger the pool of suppliers, the lower the impact of shocks affecting particular suppliers.
mitigation of supply shocks may also lead to more stable global demands.
Increased trade openness also means that a large shock to a particular country (e.g. US) can have a larger impact on other countries through stronger demand linkages.
Trade can mitigate the shock’s impact on the GDP of the country hit by the shock.
The model
C
ONCEPTUALF
RAMEWORKEaton-Kortum-Alvarez-Lucas’s Ricardian model of trade
N countries with immobile nonproduced equipped labour and produced good (used as intermediates and for direct consumption).
Efficiency varies across countries and goods; modeled as random variables drawn from a (known) distribution.
Constant returns to scale and perfect competition.
Output for a given country is deterministic; there is no aggregate volatility
Add country-specific shocks, which shift the distribution of efficiencies in a country
Output in a country becomes stochastic.
P
RODUCTIVE STRUCTUREEK-AL
A
UTARKYBuyers purchase individual goodsq(x)to maximize the CES:
q= Z ∞
0
q(x)η−1η φ(x)dx η−1η α
(1)
φis the density of goods with technology x.
Technology forq(x)(per unit of L) is Cobb-Douglas:
q(x) =x−θs(x)βqm(x)1−β (2)
i) drawsxare common to all producers; ii) CRS→p=mc; iii)x∼exp(λ) Price of bundle
p=
λ Z ∞
0
p(x)1−ηe−λxdx 1−η1 α
(3)
Price of individual goods
p(x) =Bxθwβp1−β (4)
M
ULTI-
COUNTRY OPEN ECONOMYq(x)can be traded internationally.
φ(x) =φ(x1, ...,xN)is the joint density of goods that have productivity drawsx = (x1, ...,xN)across N countries.
Draws independent across countries.
Delivering a tradable good from countryjto countryi results in 0< κij ≤1 arriving at j (=1 ifi=j);κij ≥κikκkj,∀i,k,j.
P
RODUCTIONThe total output for use as input or consumption in countryi.
qi = Z
RN+
qi(x)
η−1
η φ(x)dx
!η−1η
(5)
Price
pi =AB
N
X
j=1
wjβp1−βj κij
!−1/θ λj
−θ
(6)
where:A(θ, η) = R∞
0 e−zzθ(1−η)dz1−η1 B=β−β(1−β)β−1
S
IMPLEV
ERSION OF THEM
ODEL: S
UMMARY1 pi(w) =AB PN j=1
wjβpj(w)1−β κij
−1/θ
λj
!−θ
;
2 dij(w) =
R
Bijpi(x)qi(x)φ(x)dx
piqi = (AB)−1/θ
wjβpj(w)1−β pi(w)κij
−1/θ
λj;
3 Lipiqi =PN
j=1Ljpjqjdji(w) Yi = Liwi
pi =realGDP (7)
A
DDING COUNTRY-
SPECIFIC SHOCKSIn EKAL,λj’s are deterministic, so GDP per capita is a deterministic constant for each countryj.
Assume now thatλj’s are subject to shocks
Higher realization ofλj leads to stochastically lower costsx in countryj and higherGDPj
Stochasticity inλj imparts stochasticity inGDPj.
Some Simple Analytical Results
L
EVEL AND VOLATILITY OFGDP
INA
UTARKYGDP:
Yi = Liwi
pi = Liwi
(AB)1/βλ−θ/βi wi = (AB)−1/βZi (8) where,Zi ≡λθ/βi iLi
Volatility
Var( ˆYi) =Var( ˆZi) (9) xˆ≡ ∆ln(x)∆t
L
EVEL AND VOLATILITY OFGDP
IN COSTLESS TRADE GDPYi = (AB)−1/βZ
β β+θ
i
N
X
j=1
Z
β θ+β
j
θ/β
(10)
Volatility:
Var( ˆYi) =
β+θγi β+θ
2
Var( ˆZi) + θ
β+θ
2
PN
j6=iγi2Var( ˆZj) +2θ(β+θ)β+θγi2
PN
j6=iγjCov( ˆZj,Zˆi)
C
OSTLESS TRADE VERSUS AUTARKYProductivity gain:
YiT YiA =
Z
β β+θ
i
PN
j=1Z
β β+θ
j
θ/β
Zi =
1+Z
−β β+θ
i N
X
j6=i
Z
β β+θ
j
θ/β
>1
Gain higher
I the smaller the country:Z
−β β+θ
i
PZ
β β+θ
j
II the higher the importance of tradeables in production(1−β)
III the higher the scope of comparative advantageθ.
C
HANGE IN VARIANCE(
COSTLESS TRADE VERSUS AUTARKY)
IfVar( ˆZi) =σandCov( ˆZi,Zˆj) =0 Var( ˆYiT) =σ
β+θγi β+θ
2
+ θ
β+θ 2 N
X
j6=i
γj2
(11)
ThenVar( ˆYiA)>Var( ˆYiT)
Decline in volatility is higher the smaller the country (lowerγi) Results can be reversed if covariance are high and/or the volatility
Some Numerical Illustrations
E
XERCISESEach period, drawλ= (λ1, ..., λN)from a log-normal distribution with fixed mean and std deviation
ChooseA,B, θ, α, βas in AL
Time series, volatility and covariance:
S
OME SIMPLE EXPERIMENTS1 Widespread decrease in international trade barriers
2 China joins the World
3 Crisis hits big country
C
ALIBRATION"Barriers decrease":
LN=1;κij,t =κtincreases over time fori6=j andκii,t=1.
Same, butLN= (1,1,1,3,3).
"China joins": Same, butLN = (1,1,1,3,3); andκi5,t =κ5j,t
smaller att =1.
"Crisis hit": lowλfor a big country;LN = (1,1,1,3,3).
U
NIFORM DECREASE IN TRADE BARRIERSLN =1;κij increases uniformly over time from 0.5 to 0.9 (κii,t =1)
U
NIFORM DECREASE IN TRADE BARRIERS,
WITH SOME BIG COUNTRIESC
HINA JOINS THEW
ORLDκij increases uniformly but for a big country it increases more rapidly:
1−4=0.75→0.9, for the 5th moves 0.4→0.9. L=(1,1,1,3,3)
S
HOCK TOB
IG COUNTRYCounterfactual
C
OUNTERFACTUALC
OUNTERFACTUALC
OUNTERFACTUALCorrelations:
magnitude of the change in volatility and the magnitude of the change in trade costs:0.70
change (absolute) in volatility and actual level of volatility:0.41 fall in volatility and size of the country:−0.21
C
ONCLUSIONSWhen country-specific shocks are imperfectly correlated, trade can lead to lower volatility, particularly when
a country is small
the share of tradeables in the economy is big
trading partners are less volatile or the correlations are small.
A preliminary quantitative exercise shows sizeable decreases in volatility due to trade in small, open economies, but small changes in large countries.
The introduction of new trading partners:
1 increases the correlation of growth rates with the new partners
2 can decrease bilateral correlations among members of the "old"
group (US-Europe)