• Nenhum resultado encontrado

D IVERSIFICATIONTHROUGH T RADE

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Share "D IVERSIFICATIONTHROUGH T RADE"

Copied!
30
0
0

Texto

(1)

D

IVERSIFICATION THROUGH

T

RADE

Franceso Caselli Miklos Koren Milan Lisicky Silvana Tenreyro

January 2011

(2)

T

HREE DEVELOPMENTS IN THE

W

ORLD ECONOMY

1 Substantial decline in output volatility in developed countries

in majority of developing countries

2 Large and widespread increase in trade openness

emergence of new trading partners (e.g. China and India)

3 Fast transmission of the current crisis, with the near collapse of trade

(3)

T

HE

"

ESTABLISHED

"

VIEW

Openness to trade=⇒specialization=⇒increases volatility.

Implicit assumption: sector-specific shocks are the prevalent source of volatility.

But in volatility accounting, country-specific shocks (affecting all sectors) account for a large part of overall volatility.

Openness to trade may lead to sectoral specialization, but it may also help diversify country-specific shocks (both on demand and supply sides).

(4)

A

N INTUITION FOR A LINK

Increased trade openness brings about a larger pool of potential suppliers of input, and thus the potential for diversification of cost shocks.

the larger the pool of suppliers, the lower the impact of shocks affecting particular suppliers.

mitigation of supply shocks may also lead to more stable global demands.

Increased trade openness also means that a large shock to a particular country (e.g. US) can have a larger impact on other countries through stronger demand linkages.

Trade can mitigate the shock’s impact on the GDP of the country hit by the shock.

(5)

The model

(6)

C

ONCEPTUAL

F

RAMEWORK

Eaton-Kortum-Alvarez-Lucas’s Ricardian model of trade

N countries with immobile nonproduced equipped labour and produced good (used as intermediates and for direct consumption).

Efficiency varies across countries and goods; modeled as random variables drawn from a (known) distribution.

Constant returns to scale and perfect competition.

Output for a given country is deterministic; there is no aggregate volatility

Add country-specific shocks, which shift the distribution of efficiencies in a country

Output in a country becomes stochastic.

(7)

P

RODUCTIVE STRUCTURE

EK-AL

(8)

A

UTARKY

Buyers purchase individual goodsq(x)to maximize the CES:

q= Z

0

q(x)η−1η φ(x)dx η−1η α

(1)

φis the density of goods with technology x.

Technology forq(x)(per unit of L) is Cobb-Douglas:

q(x) =x−θs(x)βqm(x)1−β (2)

i) drawsxare common to all producers; ii) CRSp=mc; iii)xexp(λ) Price of bundle

p=

λ Z

0

p(x)1−ηe−λxdx 1−η1 α

(3)

Price of individual goods

p(x) =Bxθwβp1−β (4)

(9)

M

ULTI

-

COUNTRY OPEN ECONOMY

q(x)can be traded internationally.

φ(x) =φ(x1, ...,xN)is the joint density of goods that have productivity drawsx = (x1, ...,xN)across N countries.

Draws independent across countries.

Delivering a tradable good from countryjto countryi results in 0< κij ≤1 arriving at j (=1 ifi=j);κij ≥κikκkj,∀i,k,j.

(10)

P

RODUCTION

The total output for use as input or consumption in countryi.

qi = Z

RN+

qi(x)

η−1

η φ(x)dx

!η−1η

(5)

Price

pi =AB

N

X

j=1

wjβp1−βj κij

!−1/θ λj

−θ

(6)

where:A(θ, η) = R

0 e−zzθ(1−η)dz1−η1 B=β−β(1β)β−1

(11)

S

IMPLE

V

ERSION OF THE

M

ODEL

: S

UMMARY

1 pi(w) =AB PN j=1

wjβpj(w)1−β κij

−1/θ

λj

!−θ

;

2 dij(w) =

R

Bijpi(x)qi(x)φ(x)dx

piqi = (AB)−1/θ

wjβpj(w)1−β pi(w)κij

−1/θ

λj;

3 Lipiqi =PN

j=1Ljpjqjdji(w) Yi = Liwi

pi =realGDP (7)

(12)

A

DDING COUNTRY

-

SPECIFIC SHOCKS

In EKAL,λj’s are deterministic, so GDP per capita is a deterministic constant for each countryj.

Assume now thatλj’s are subject to shocks

Higher realization ofλj leads to stochastically lower costsx in countryj and higherGDPj

Stochasticity inλj imparts stochasticity inGDPj.

(13)

Some Simple Analytical Results

(14)

L

EVEL AND VOLATILITY OF

GDP

IN

A

UTARKY

GDP:

Yi = Liwi

pi = Liwi

(AB)1/βλ−θ/βi wi = (AB)−1/βZi (8) where,Zi ≡λθ/βi iLi

Volatility

Var( ˆYi) =Var( ˆZi) (9) xˆ≡ ∆ln(x)∆t

(15)

L

EVEL AND VOLATILITY OF

GDP

IN COSTLESS TRADE GDP

Yi = (AB)−1/βZ

β β+θ

i

N

X

j=1

Z

β θ+β

j

θ/β

(10)

Volatility:

Var( ˆYi) =

β+θγi β+θ

2

Var( ˆZi) + θ

β+θ

2

PN

j6=iγi2Var( ˆZj) +2θ(β+θ)β+θγi2

PN

j6=iγjCov( ˆZj,Zˆi)

(16)

C

OSTLESS TRADE VERSUS AUTARKY

Productivity gain:

YiT YiA =

Z

β β+θ

i

PN

j=1Z

β β+θ

j

θ/β

Zi =

1+Z

−β β+θ

i N

X

j6=i

Z

β β+θ

j

θ/β

>1

Gain higher

I the smaller the country:Z

−β β+θ

i

PZ

β β+θ

j

II the higher the importance of tradeables in production(1β)

III the higher the scope of comparative advantageθ.

(17)

C

HANGE IN VARIANCE

(

COSTLESS TRADE VERSUS AUTARKY

)

IfVar( ˆZi) =σandCov( ˆZi,Zˆj) =0 Var( ˆYiT) =σ

β+θγi β+θ

2

+ θ

β+θ 2 N

X

j6=i

γj2

 (11)

ThenVar( ˆYiA)>Var( ˆYiT)

Decline in volatility is higher the smaller the country (lowerγi) Results can be reversed if covariance are high and/or the volatility

(18)

Some Numerical Illustrations

(19)

E

XERCISES

Each period, drawλ= (λ1, ..., λN)from a log-normal distribution with fixed mean and std deviation

ChooseA,B, θ, α, βas in AL

Time series, volatility and covariance:

(20)

S

OME SIMPLE EXPERIMENTS

1 Widespread decrease in international trade barriers

2 China joins the World

3 Crisis hits big country

(21)

C

ALIBRATION

"Barriers decrease":

LN=1;κij,t =κtincreases over time fori6=j andκii,t=1.

Same, butLN= (1,1,1,3,3).

"China joins": Same, butLN = (1,1,1,3,3); andκi5,t5j,t

smaller att =1.

"Crisis hit": lowλfor a big country;LN = (1,1,1,3,3).

(22)

U

NIFORM DECREASE IN TRADE BARRIERS

LN =1;κij increases uniformly over time from 0.5 to 0.9 (κii,t =1)

(23)

U

NIFORM DECREASE IN TRADE BARRIERS

,

WITH SOME BIG COUNTRIES

(24)

C

HINA JOINS THE

W

ORLD

κij increases uniformly but for a big country it increases more rapidly:

1−4=0.75→0.9, for the 5th moves 0.4→0.9. L=(1,1,1,3,3)

(25)

S

HOCK TO

B

IG COUNTRY

(26)

Counterfactual

(27)

C

OUNTERFACTUAL

(28)

C

OUNTERFACTUAL

(29)

C

OUNTERFACTUAL

Correlations:

magnitude of the change in volatility and the magnitude of the change in trade costs:0.70

change (absolute) in volatility and actual level of volatility:0.41 fall in volatility and size of the country:−0.21

(30)

C

ONCLUSIONS

When country-specific shocks are imperfectly correlated, trade can lead to lower volatility, particularly when

a country is small

the share of tradeables in the economy is big

trading partners are less volatile or the correlations are small.

A preliminary quantitative exercise shows sizeable decreases in volatility due to trade in small, open economies, but small changes in large countries.

The introduction of new trading partners:

1 increases the correlation of growth rates with the new partners

2 can decrease bilateral correlations among members of the "old"

group (US-Europe)

Referências

Documentos relacionados

A escolha da APT (anestesia peridural torácica) é devido a diminuição da resposta simpática, metabólica e melhor controle da dor pós-operatória, haja vista um melhor

This 3rd edition of the OMI measures the performance of 75 countries in terms of market openness based on four specific components: their observed openness to trade, their trade

eles: coeficiente de uniformidade de distribuição (CUD), coeficiente de uniformidade absoluta (CUa), uniformidade de emissão do sistema (UE), uniformidade

To address this question, we measured muscle activity (with electromyography) in the corrugator-supercilii and zygomaticus-major muscles during the perceptual timing task

Oeiras é um concelho com 10 freguesias (Algés, Barcarena, Carnaxide, Caxias, Cruz Quebrada - Dafundo, Linda-a-Velha, Oeiras e São Julião da Barra, Paço de Arcos, Porto Salvo,

Language barriers can impose significant costs on bilateral trade between countries that do not share some sort of common language, either an official language or a

comparative advantage can be indicated by the trade performance of countries in regard to manufacturing products, in the sense that the commodity pattern of trade reflects

In summary, this paper demonstrates that policies promoting the economic openness of a country to international trade, the increase of productivity levels, and economic growth are