ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Carbohydrate
Polymers
jo u r n al h om ep a g e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / c a r b p o l
Hybrid
nanosystems
based
on
natural
polymers
as
protein
carriers
for
respiratory
delivery:
Stability
and
toxicological
evaluation
Susana
Rodrigues
a,
Clara
Cordeiro
b,c,d,
Bego ˜
na
Seijo
e,
Carmen
Remu ˜
nán-López
e,
Ana
Grenha
a,∗aCBME–CentreforMolecularandStructuralBiomedicine/IBB–InstituteforBiotechnologyandBioengineering,UniversityofAlgarve,
FacultyofSciencesandTechnology,CampusdeGambelas,8005-139Faro,Portugal
bFacultyofSciencesandTechnology,UniversityofAlgarve,CampusdeGambelas,8005-139Faro,Portugal
cCEAUL–CenterofStatisticsandApplications,FacultyofSciences,UniversityofLisbon,CampoGrande,1749-016Lisboa,Portugal dCESUAlg–CentreforResearchandDevelopmentinHealth,UniversityofAlgarve,Portugal
eNanoBioFarGroup,DepartmentofPharmacyandPharmaceuticalTechnology,FacultyofPharmacy,UniversityofSantiagodeCompostela,
CampusVida,15782SantiagodeCompostela,Spain
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory: Received18August2014 Receivedinrevisedform 27November2014 Accepted21January2015 Availableonline3February2015 Keywords: Biocompatibility Microencapsulation Nanoparticles Nasaldelivery Proteindelivery Pulmonarydelivery
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Chitosan/carrageenan/tripolyphosphatenanoparticleswerepreviouslypresentedasholdingpotential foranapplicationintransmucosaldeliveryofmacromolecules,withtripolyphosphatedemonstratingto contributeforbothsizereductionandstabilisationofthenanoparticles.Thisworkwasaimedat evaluat-ingthecapacityofthenanoparticlesasproteincarriersforpulmonaryandnasaltransmucosaldelivery, furtherassessingtheirbiocompatibilitypatternregardingthatapplication.Nanoparticlesdemonstrated stabilityinpresenceoflysozyme,whilefreeze-dryingwasshowntopreservetheircharacteristicswhen glucoseorsucrosewereusedascryoprotectants.Bovineserumalbuminwasassociatedtothe nanoparti-cles,whichweresuccessfullymicroencapsulatedbyspray-dryingtomeettheaerodynamicrequirements inherenttopulmonarydelivery.Finally,asatisfactorybiocompatibilityprofilewasdemonstratedupon exposureoftworespiratorycelllines(Calu-3andA549cells)tothecarriers.Anegligibleeffectoncell via-bilityalongwithnoalterationsontransepithelialelectricalresistanceandnoinductionofinflammatory responsewereobserved.
©2015ElsevierLtd.Allrightsreserved.
1. Introduction
Severalphysicochemical and biopharmaceutical issues make
systemicadministrationofbiomoleculesachallengingtask(Gupta
&Sharma,2009),compellingtheneedtodevelopadequatedrug
deliverysystemsthatovercomeinherentlimitations.Thesecarriers
aremainlydeveloped toavoid theneed ofparenteral
adminis-tration, instead permittingeffective transmucosal delivery. The
pulmonary and nasal routes are increasingly addressed in this
context, because of the large absorptive surface and the easy
access, respectively, among other characteristics. Carriers are
∗ Correspondingauthorat:CentreforMolecularandStructuralBiomedicine (CBME),FacultyofSciencesandTechnology,Building8,Room3.1,Campusde Gam-belas,8005-139Faro,Portugal.Tel.:+351289800100x7441;fax:+351289818419.
E-mailaddresses:susananasus@gmail.com(S.Rodrigues),ccordei@ualg.pt
(C.Cordeiro),mbegona.seijo@usc.es(B.Seijo),mdelcarmen.remunan@usc.es
(C.Remu ˜nán-López),amgrenha@ualg.pt(A.Grenha).
thusdesignedtoexhibitcharacteristicsthatimprovethe
epithe-lialcontact, while protecting sensitivebioactivematerials from
invivodegradation.Nanoparticlesarefirst-linecandidatesforthis
end, successfully associating therapeutic macromolecules (Reis,
Neufeld,Ribeiro,&Veiga,2006).Apreviousstudydemonstratedthe
abilityoftwonaturalpolymers,chitosan(CS)and-carrageenan
(CRG),toassembleintonanoparticlesof400–600nmbysimple
polyelectrolytecomplexation(Grenhaetal.,2010).WhileCSisa
verywell-knownmaterial,theabilitiesofCRGarenotsufficiently
explored.Apart from theadvantage of using natural materials,
whichfacilitatesbiocompatibility(Malafaya,Silva,&Reis,2007),
thepolyelectrolytecomplexationbetweenCSandCRGusesvery
mildconditions,occurringinhydrophilicmedium(Grenha,2012).
Nevertheless, theintimatecontact betweenthecarrier and the
epithelialsurface that highlyfavours mucosaldeliveryofdrugs
is reported to be maximal for particles of 50–500nm (Desai,
Labhasetwar,Amidon, &Levy, 1996; Jani, Halbert,Langridge, & Florence,1990)andstrongpositivesurfacecharge(Bogatajetal., 2003;Carvalho,Bruschi,Evangelista,&Gremião,2010).Therefore,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.01.048
morerecentlyweassociatedtripolyphosphate(TPP)totheCS/CRG
nanoparticleformulationasacross-linkingagent,providingasize
decreaseandobtainingmorestablenanoparticles(Rodrigues,Rosa
daCosta,&Grenha,2012).
Notwithstandingtherelevancethatnanoparticleshavegained
inthelastdecade,thefactisthatseverallimitationsarestillto
overcomeregardingtheirapplication.Theinherenttendencyfor
particleaggregation,chemical instabilityof polymersand early
releaseofactivesubstancesaremajorproblemstobeaddressed.
In addition,as nanoparticlesare usually formulatedas
suspen-sions,theyarepronetomicrobialgrowth(Wu,Zhang,&Watanabe,
2011).Therefore,underallaspects,thephysicalandchemical
sta-bilityofthesystemsisexpectedtobeimprovedifwaterisremoved
(Abdelwahed,Degobert,Stainmesse,&Fessi,2006).Theshelf-life
of nanoparticlesis a relevant aspect of theirpotential
applica-tionasdrugdeliverycarriers, especiallyconcerningtheneedto
maintainunaltered physicochemical characteristics along time.
Freeze-dryingappearsinthiscontextasaveryadequatechoice,
ensuringasoftdryingprocedure.Themoreaggressiveconditions
associatedtofreeze-dryingcanbesoftenedbytheuseofspecific
protectants. These will provide the formation of a solid
amor-phousglassfilmaroundthenanoparticlesandtheimmobilisation
ofthecarriers,preventingaggregationandpromotingstabilisation
(Beirowski,Inghelbrecht,Arien,&Gieseler,2011,2012).
Safety issues are another permanent subject adjacent to
nanoparticle applications. In fact, regarding the inhalation of
nanoparticles,theirfateafteradministrationremainsuncertainand
thereis thepossibilityofaccumulation inthelung tissueupon
repeatedadministrations(Rogueda&Traini,2007).Withregardto
theevaluationofmaterialssafety,thereisageneral
recommenda-tionconsideringthataninitialinvitroevaluationshouldcomprise
differentcelllinesandtimesofexposure,whilenotonlycell
via-bilitybutalsotheinflammatoryresponseshouldbedetermined
(ISO,2009;Rodrigues,Dionísio,Remu ˜nán-López,&Grenha,2012).
TheCalu-3 andA549 respiratoryepithelial celllines havebeen
frequentlyusedinthiscontexttoevaluatethebehaviourof
sys-temsaimedatrespiratorydrugdelivery,eithernasalorpulmonary
(Foster,Avery,Yazdanian,&Audus,2000;Grenhaetal.,2007;Nahar etal.,2013).
Inthiswork,weaimedatexploringthepotentialofCS/CRG/TPP
nanoparticlesforanapplicationinnasalandpulmonary
transmu-cosaldeliveryofproteins,placingaparticularemphasisontheir
biocompatibilitybehaviour.Additionally,thestabilityof
nanopar-ticlesinpresenceoflysozyme(anenzymepresentinthenasaland
lungmucosa),aswellastheabilityoffreeze-dryingtoprovideadry
formofnanoparticlesuspensions,werealsoassessed.Regarding
pulmonaryadministration,asnanoparticlesareknowntolackthe
adequateaerodynamicdiametertopermitdeeplungdeliverywith
success, which should vary between 1 and 5m, thestrategy
ofmicroencapsulatingthenanocarrierswasapplied,following a
previouslydescribedapproach(Grenha,Seijo,&Remu ˜nán-López,
2005).
2. Materialsandmethods
2.1. Materials
Chitosan (low molecular weight, deacetylation degree=75–
85%), pentasodium tripolyphosphate, bovine serum albumin
(BSA), phosphate buffer saline (PBS) tablets pH 7.4,
Dul-becco’smodifiedEagle’smedium(DMEM),penicillin/streptomycin
(10,000units/mL, 10,000g/mL), non-essential amino acids,
l-glutamine 200mM, trypsin–EDTA solution (2.5g/L trypsin,
0.5g/L EDTA), trypan blue solution (0.4%), thiazolyl blue
tetra-zolium bromide (MTT), sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), N,
N-dimethylformamyde (DMF), glycerol, lipopolysacharide(LPS),
dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), lysozyme and glacial acetic acid
weresuppliedbySigmaChemicals(Germany).k-Carrageenanwas
obtainedfromFMCBiopolymer(Norway)andfoetalbovineserum
(FBS)wasfromGibco(USA).Ultrapurewater(Milli-QPlus,
Milli-poreIberica,Spain)wasusedthroughout.
2.2. Celllines
TheCalu-3andA549celllineswereobtainedfromtheAmerican
TypeCultureCollection(Rockville,USA)andusedbetween
pas-sages35–45and20–30,respectively.Cellculturesweregrownin
75cm2flasksinahumidified5%CO
2/95%atmosphericairincubator
at37◦C.Forbothcelllines,cellculturemedium(CCM)wasDMEM
supplementedwith10%(v/v)FBS,1%(v/v)non-essential amino
acidssolution,1%(v/v)l-glutaminesolution(200mM)and1%(v/v)
penicillin/streptomycin.Mediumwasexchangedevery2–3days
andcellsweresubculturedweeklyinthecaseofA549cellsand
every10–15daysforCalu-3cellline.
2.3. PreparationofCS/CRG/TPPnanoparticles
CS/CRG/TPP nanoparticles were prepared as described
pre-viously (Rodrigues, Rosa da Costa, et al., 2012) based on the
polyelectrolytecomplexationofCSwithCRGandadditionalionic
gelationofchitosanwithTPPanions.Afteraninitialoptimisation,
afinaltheoreticalCS/CRG/TPPratioof4/1/1(w/w)wasselectedto
performthestudies(4/1/0forcontrolnanoparticles).Briefly,CSwas
dissolvedin1%(w/w)aceticacidtoobtainasolutionof1mg/mL.
CRGandTPPweredissolvedinpurifiedwaterandmixedtoobtain
asolutionwheretheconcentrationofeachpolymeris0.63mg/mL.
Thespontaneousformationofnanoparticlesoccursupon
incorpo-rationof0.8mLofasolutionofCRG/TPPorCRGinto2mLoftheCS
solution,undergentlemagneticstirringatroomtemperature.
TheassociationofBSAtothenanoparticleswasperformedby
dissolvingtheproteininwaterandmixingwithapreviously
pre-paredmixture of CRG/TPP solution,prior totheaddition toCS
solution,as described above.The amount of BSA associated to
eachbatchwascalculatedtorepresentatheoreticalcontentof30%
(w/w)oftheamountofCS.
Nanoparticleswereconcentratedbycentrifugationat16,000×g
ona10Lglycerollayerfor30minat15◦C(HeraeusFresco17
cen-trifuge,Thermoscientific,USA).Afterdiscardingthesupernatants,
thenanoparticleswereresuspendedin200lofpurifiedwater.
Whennofurtherindicationisprovided,‘CS/CRG/TPP
nanopar-ticles’refertomassratios4/1/1.
2.4. Characterisationofnanoparticles
2.4.1. Determinationofproductionyield
Thenanoparticleproductionyieldwascalculatedby
gravime-try.Fixedvolumesofnanoparticlesuspensionswerecentrifuged
(16,000×g,30min,15◦C),andsedimentswerefreeze-driedover
24hat−34◦C,followedbyagradualincreaseintemperatureuntil
20◦C,usingaLabconcofreezedryer(Labconco,USA)(n=3).The
yieldofnanoparticleproduction(PY)wascalculatedasfollows:
PY=NanoparticleTotalsolidssedimentweightweight×100 (1)
wherenanoparticle sedimentweightistheweightafter
freeze-dryingandtotalsolidsweightisthetotalamountofsolidsadded
fornanoparticleformation.
2.4.2. Morphologicalobservation
The morphological examination of CS/CRG/TPP
(JEM-1011,JEOL,Japan).Thesampleswerestainedwith2%(w/v)
phosphotungsticacid(Carvalho,Grenha,Remunan-Lopez,Alonso,
&Seijo,2009)andplacedoncoppergridswithcarbonfilms(Ted
Pella,USA)forTEMobservation.
2.4.3. Physicochemicalproperties
Measurements of nanoparticle size and zeta potential were
performed on freshly prepared samples by photon correlation
spectroscopyandlaserDoppleranemometry,respectively,using
aZetasizerNanoZS(MalvernInstruments,Malvern,UK).Forthe
analysisofparticlesizeanddeterminationoftheelectrophoretic
mobility,eachsamplewasdilutedtotheappropriateconcentration
withultrapurewaterandplacedintheelectrophoreticcell.Each
analysiswasperformedat25◦C.Threebatchesofeachformulation
wereanalysed(n=3).
2.4.4. DeterminationofBSAassociationcapacity
The amount of non-encapsulated BSA was determined in
thesupernatantbyreversephase-highperformanceliquid
chro-matography (RP-HPLC; Agilent 1100 series, Germany). The
chromatographicconditions wereadapted fromUmrethia,Kett,
Andrews,Malcolm,andWoolfson(2010)asfollows:Aeris
wide-pore3.6uXB-C18300Acolumn4.6mmi.d.×250mmlengthwith
securityguardcartridge(Phenomenex,UK);runtemperature25◦C;
gradientflow(0.1%TFAinwater(A),0.1%TFAinacetonitrile(B);
A/Bfrom95:5to35:65in 10min)mobilephase,total runtime
15min,UVdetectionat280nm;flow rate1.0mL/min;injection
volume20L;BSAretentiontime8.8min.Alinearcalibrationplot
forBSAinthedifferentsolvents(aceticacidsolution,PBSpH7.4and
bufferpH6.8)wasobtainedovertherange10–120g/mL(n=3).
BSAassociationefficiency(AE)andnanoparticleloadingcapacity
(LC)werecalculatedasfollows:
AE= (TotalamountofBSA−freeamountofBSA)
TotalamountofBSA ×100 (2)
LC=(TotalamountofBSA−freeamountofBSA)
Nanoparticleweight ×100 (3)
2.5. Evaluationofnanoparticlestabilityinthepresenceof
lysozyme
ThestabilityofCS/CRG/TPPnanoparticles(4/1/0and4/1/1)was
analysedinpresenceoflysozyme.Todoso,nanoparticle
suspen-sionsataconcentrationof1mg/mLwereincubatedwithlysozyme
(0.2and0.8mg/mL)(Grenhaetal.,2005)at37◦Cundermild
hor-izontalshaking,for120min.Atappropriatetimeintervals(30,60,
90and120min),thesizeandzetapotentialofnanoparticleswere
measured,asdescribedabove(n=3).
2.6. Nanoparticlestabilityuponfreeze-drying
Withtheaimofdevelopingapharmaceuticallyacceptabledry
formofthenanoparticle suspensions,CS/CRG/TPPnanoparticles
weresubmittedtoafreeze-dryingstudy.Differentconcentrations
ofnanoparticles(1,2and4mg/mL)anddifferentcryoprotectants
(trehalose,lactose,sucroseandglucose)atvariedconcentrations
weretestedasvariablesintheoptimisationofnanoparticle
stabi-lisationbyfreeze-drying.Toperformthestudy,1mLofunloaded
nanoparticleswasfreeze-driedinthepresenceof5or10%(w/v)of
cryoprotectant.Thefreeze-dryingprocessoccurredatapressure
of50–100Torrand consistedof 24hof primarydrying,starting
at−35◦C andgraduallyincreasingto−10◦C,24hat0◦Cand a
finalstepofsecondarydrying(12–24h)at15◦C(LabconcoCorp.,
USA).Afterfreeze-drying,nanoparticlesuspensionswere
reconsti-tutedbyaddingthevolumeofwatercorrespondingtotheinitial
volume(1mL),andtheirsizeandzetapotentialweredetermined
asindicatedabove(n=3).
Theconditionsfoundtobettermaintaintheoriginalproperties
ofunloadednanoparticleswereappliedonBSA-loaded
nanopar-ticles.Inthiscase,nanoparticleconcentrationsof1and2mg/mL
werefreeze-driedwithbothglucoseandsucroseataconcentration
of10%(w/w).
2.7. Preparationofmicroencapsulatednanoparticles
Mannitolwasselectedasmatrixmaterialfortheproductionof
microparticles,aswaspreviouslydescribed(Grenhaetal.,2005).
Anaqueoussolutionoftheexcipientwaspreparedata
concentra-tionof1.6%(w/v).Uponcentrifugation,CS/CRG/TPPnanoparticles
wereresuspendedwiththemannitolsolutioninsteadofwater,in
ordertoobtainamannitol/nanoparticleratioof80/20(w/w).The
finalsolidconcentrationofthesuspensionswas2%(w/v).
Dry powders were obtainedby spray-dryingthe previously
preparedsuspensionusingalaboratory-scalespray-dryer(Buchi®
MiniSprayDryer,B-290,Buchi,Switzerland).
Thespray-dryingconditionswere:feedrateof2.5mL/min,two
fluidsexternalnozzle0.7mm,inlettemperatureof160±2◦C,
out-lettemperatureof95±3◦C.Theairflowrateandtheaspiratorwere
keptconstantat400Nl/hand80%,respectively.Thespray-dried
powderswerecollectedandstoredinadesiccatoratroom
temper-atureuntiluse.
2.8. Characterisationofmicroencapsulatednanoparticles
2.8.1. Determinationofspray-dryingyield
Thespray-dryingyieldwascalculatedbygravimetry,
compar-ingthetotalamountofsolidsinitiallyaddedforthepreparationof
microencapsulatednanoparticles(CS+CRG+TPP+BSA+mannitol)
withtheamountofresultingmicrospheres(n=3).Thefollowing
equationwasusedforthecalculation:
Yield(%)=Microspheresweight
Totalsolidsweight ×100 (4)
2.8.2. Morphologicalandaerodynamiccharacterisation
Themorphologicalcharacterisationofmicrosphereswas
per-formed using a field emission scanning electron microscope
(FESEM;FESEMUltraPlus,Zeiss,Germany)at3kVofvoltage,which
isequippedwithasecondaryelectron(SE)detector.Thedry
pow-derswereplacedontometalplatesanda5nmthickgoldpalladium
film wassputter-coated onthe samples(Q150T S/E/ES Sputter
Coater,QuorumTechnologies,UK)beforeviewing.
TheparticlesizewasestimatedastheFeret’sdiameter(distance
betweentwotangentsonoppositesidesoftheparticles)andwas
directlydeterminedwithanopticalmicroscope(OlympusIX51,
Japan).Theestimationwasbasedonthemeandiameterresulting
fromtheevaluationof300particles(n=300).
Real density was determined using a Helium Pycnometer
(Micropycnometer, Quanta Chrome, model MPY-2,USA) (n=3).
Apparenttapdensitywasobtainedbymeasuringthevolumeof
aknownweightofpowderina10mLtest-tubeaftermechanical
tapping(30tap/min,Tecnociencia,Spain).Afterregistrationofthe
initialvolume,thetest-tubewassubmittedtotappinguntil
con-stantvolumewasachieved,accordingtoapreviouslydescribed
method(El-Gibaly,2002)(n=3).
TheaerodynamicdiameterwasobtainedusingaTSIAerosizer®
LDequippedwithanAerodisperser®(AmherstProcessInstrument
Inc.,Amherst,MA,USA)andassumingrealdensityasthedensity
2.9. Invitrobiocompatibilitystudy
2.9.1. Evaluationofmetabolicactivity
TheinvitrocytotoxicityofCS/CRG/TPPnanoparticles,
microen-capsulatednanoparticles(mannitol/nanoparticles=80/20,w/w),as
wellasthatoftherawmaterialsinvolvedinnanoparticle
produc-tion,wasassessedbythemetabolicassaythiazolylbluetetrazolium
bromide(MTT)test.Twocelllinesrepresentative ofpulmonary
andnasalepithelia(Calu-3andA549cells)wereused.A549cells
wereseededatadensityof1×104cells/wellandCalu-3cellsat
2×104cells/wellin96-wellplates,in100lofthesamemedium
usedforcultureincellcultureflasks.Thecellsweregrownat37◦C
ina5%CO2atmospherefor24hbeforeuse(Grenhaetal.,2007).
Three different concentrations (0.1, 0.5 and 1.0mg/mL) of
nanoparticles were evaluated for cytotoxicity over 3 and 24h.
Suspensions of unloaded nanoparticles and microencapsulated
nanoparticles,BSAloadednanoparticlesandsolutionsofthe
indi-vidualrawmaterials(CS,CRGandTPP)wereevaluatedseparately
forcytotoxicity.Sodiumdodecylsulphate(SDS,2%,w/v)wasused
asapositivecontrolofcelldeath.Optimalcellseedingdensityand
theabsenceofMTT conversionintheassaymediumwere
con-firmedinpreliminaryexperiments.Allformulationsandcontrols
werepreparedassolution/suspensionsinpre-warmedCCM
with-outFBSimmediatelybeforeapplicationtothecells.
Toinitiatetheassay,culturemediumofcellsat24hinculture
wasreplacedby100LoffreshmediumwithoutFBScontaining
thetest samplesor controls.After3 or 24hof cell incubation,
samples/controlswereremoved and 30Lof theMTT solution
(0.5mg/mLinPBS,pH7.4)wereaddedtoeachwell.After2h,any
generatedformazancrystalsweresolubilisedwith50LofDMSO.
Uponcompletesolubilisationofthecrystals,theabsorbanceofeach
wellwasmeasuredbyspectrophotometry(InfiniteM200,Tecan,
Austria)at540nmandcorrectedforbackgroundabsorbanceusing
awavelengthof650nm(Carmichael, DeGraff,Gazdar, Minna,&
Mitchell,1987).
Therelativecellviability(%)wascalculatedasfollows:
Viability(%)= (CM(A−S)
−S)×100 (5)
whereAistheabsorbanceobtainedforeachoftheconcentrations
ofthetestsubstance,Sistheabsorbanceobtainedforthe2%SDS
andCMistheabsorbanceobtainedforuntreatedcells(incubated
withCCM).Thelatterreadingwasassumedtocorrespondto100%
cellviability.Theassaywasperformedonthreeoccasionswithsix
replicatesateachconcentrationoftestsubstanceineachinstance.
2.9.2. Determinationofinflammatoryresponse
The inflammatory response generated by the exposure to
nanoparticlesandmicroencapsulatednanoparticleswasevaluated
onCalu-3cells.Toperformtheassay,thecellswereseededon
96-wellplates(2×104cells/well)and,after24hincubationat37◦C
in5%CO2atmosphere,exposedtonanoparticlesand
microencap-sulatednanoparticlesataconcentrationof1mg/mL.Theexposure
tolipopolysaccharide(LPS;10g/mL)wasusedaspositivecontrol
(Alfaro-Morenoetal.,2009;Muraetal.,2011),whilecellsincubated
withCCMwereusedasnegativecontrol.Allformulationsand
con-trolswerepreparedassolutions/suspensionsinpre-warmedCCM
withoutFBSimmediatelybeforeapplicationtothecells.After24h
ofexposure,thecellsupernatantswerecollectedandcentrifuged
(10min,16,000×g,15◦C,centrifuge5804R,Eppendorf,Germany).
ThelevelsofIL-6andIL-8existinginCalu-3cellsupernatantswere
determinedbyquantitativeELISAusinghumanIL-6andIL-8
Quan-tikineELISAkits(R&DSystems,Minneapolis,MN),accordingtothe
manufacturer’sinstructions.Thesupernatantswereappropriately
diluted(approximately 10timesforIL-6and 50timesforIL-8).
Theassaywasperformedonthreeoccasionswithtworeplicates
oftestsubstanceineachinstance.Theconcentrationofindividual
cytokinesforeachsampleisexpressedaspercentageofthecontrol
(incubationwithCCM)fromtriplicateassays.
2.9.3. Evaluationofepithelialintegrity
Forthestudiesofepithelialintegrity,Calu-3cellswerecultured
atanair interfaceaccordingtoapreviously described
method-ology (Grainger, Greenwell, Lockley, Martin, & Forbes, 2006).
Briefly,100LofCalu-3cellsuspensionwasseededatadensity
of5×105cells/cm2 in Transwell inserts(0.33cm2), with0.5mL
mediuminthebasolateralchamber.Thecellswereincubatedat
37◦C,5%CO2for2days.Afterthistime,themediumwasaspirated
fromtheapicalandbasolateralchambersandreplacedonlyinthe
basolateralchamber,theapicalchamberbeingexposedtothe
incu-batoratmosphere.Mediumwasreplacedevery2daysthereafter.
InordertoverifytheeffectofnanoparticlesonCalu-3celllayer
integrity,theformulationsweredispersedin100LFBS-freeCCM
ata concentrationof 1mg/mL andincubated withthecell
lay-ers.Transepithelialelectricalresistance(TER)wasmeasuredusing
chopstickelectrodesandanEVOM®voltmetre(STX-2andEvomG,
WorldPrecisionInstruments,UK).TERmeasurementsweretaken
30minbeforetheexperimentandat0.5,1,2,4,6,24and48hafter
administration.TERvalueswerecalculatedbysubtractingthe
resis-tanceofcell-freecultureinsertsandcorrectingforthesurfacearea
oftheTranswellinsert.CelllayersincubatedwithCCMwereusedas
thereference(control),fromwhichTERchangesduringexposure
tothesampleswerecalculated.Allexperimentswereperformed
intriplicateonthreeoccasions.
2.10. Statisticalanalysis
Forthegeneralityofresults,thet-testandtheone-way
anal-ysisofvariance(ANOVA)withthepairwisemultiplecomparison
procedures(Dunn’smethod)wereperformedtocomparetwoor
multiplegroups,respectively.
Thefreeze-dryingcasestudydeterminestheeffectofdifferent
cryoprotectants andnanoparticle concentrationonnanoparticle
stability.Duetothenumberofobservationsinvolved(threetofour)
ineachcell/treatmentandtotheexistenceofemptycells,amore
complexstatisticalmethodologywasnotapplied,becauseitwould
compromisethemodelassumptionsandresultinmisleading
infer-ences.Therefore,thestatisticalapproachusedforthisanalysiswas
theone-wayANOVAwithGowes-Howellposthoctests,basedon
samplesizesandvariancehomogeneitybetweengroups.
Thefactorialdesign(FD)isoftenusedformanipulative
exper-iments,suchasthatofthemetabolicactivity(MTTtest).Inthat
case, for both cell lines tested (Calu-3 and A549) the effect of
sampletype(X1)andconcentration(X2)oncellviability(Y).Each
ofthefactors(X1 andX2)hasthreelevels.InthecaseofX2the
levelsare0.1, 0.5and 1.0mg/mL. ForX1 there isa splitin two
groups:(1)when rawmaterialsareconsideredthelevelsof X1
areCS,CRGandTPP;(2)whencarrierformulationsarestudied,
thelevelsareunloadednanoparticles,BSA-loadednanoparticles,
microencapsulatednanoparticles.Foreitherrawmaterialsor
car-rierformulations,theobjectiveistoinvestigatetheinfluenceof
factorsX1andX2 ontheresponsevariable(Y).FDwasoriginally
plannedwithequal number of observationsper treatment, but
someoccurrences related torandom lossof observations orto
practicalconstraints,causeinequalityofsamplesizes.Therefore,
forthefourmultifactordesignspresentinthisstudy,threewere
unbalanced with observations in every cell/treatment. For this
complexFD,thetypeIIIsumofsquares(SS)wasused,because
itisnotinfluencedbythesamplesizeineachtreatment.Thebasic
multivariateassumptionstobecheckedarethattheerrorsare
analyseswithposthoctestsHochberg’sGT2(unbalancedFD)and
Tukey,wereusedtodeterminewhichgroupsdiffer.
ThestatisticalanalyseswereperformedwiththesoftwareSPSS
(version 22.0 for windows) considering a significance level of
˛=0.05.
3. Resultsanddiscussion
CS/CRG/TPP nanoparticles were previously reported by our
group in a work that evidenced the ability of TPPto decrease
nanoparticlesizeandimprovestability(Rodrigues,RosadaCosta,
etal.,2012).Inthatwork,thepotentialofthecarriersfor
trans-mucosal drug delivery was suggested. More recently we have
observedtheability of thesenanocarrierstoassociatedifferent
proteins,demonstratingthatthepHofthenanoparticleassembly
mediumhasastrongeffectonproteinassociationandthepHofthe
releasemediumaffectsthereleaseprofile(unpublishedresults).
Thepresentworkisdedicatedtothestudyofthesenanoparticles
regardinganapplicationinnasalandpulmonarydelivery.
3.1. CharacterisationofCS/CRG/TPPnanoparticles
Afteran initialscreening of varied CS/CRG/TPP mass ratios,
seekingfortheformulationthatproducesnanoparticleswiththe
most suitable characteristics for the objective of transmucosal
delivery(Rodrigues,RosadaCosta,etal.,2012), theformulation
CS/CRG/TPP=4/1/1(w/w)wasselectedforsubsequentstudies.The
correspondingformulationwithoutTPP(CS/CRG/TPP=4/1/0,w/w)
wasusedascontrolinsomeoftheperformedstudiestoshowthe
effectoftheinclusionofTPP.
Fig. 1A depicts the result of the morphological evaluation
of BSA-loaded nanoparticles,which evidence a spherical
struc-turesimilartobothunloadednanoparticles(Rodrigues,Rosada
Costa, et al., 2012) and to polysaccharide-based nanoparticles
ingeneral(Goycoolea,Lollo,Remunan-Lopez,Quaglia,&Alonso,
2009;Oyarzun-Ampuero,Brea,Loza,Torres,&Alonso,2009;Zorzi, Párraga,Seijo,&Sánchez,2011).
AsshowninTable1,thedevelopedBSA-loadednanoparticles
evidenceadequatephysicochemical propertiesfor theobjective
oftransmucosaldelivery,witha sizearound300nmanda
pos-itivezetapotential(+40mV).Infact,thesizeissmallenoughto
permitanintimatecontactwithepithelialsurfaces,whichis
max-imalat50–500nm(Desaietal.,1996;Janietal.,1990).In turn,
thehighpositivezetapotentialfurtherpotentiatestheinteraction
withepithelia, asthis is negatively chargedand, thus, an
elec-trostaticinteractionisenabled.Insummary,thesecharacteristics
areexpected toprovide a prolongedretention of nanoparticles
closetoepithelialsurfaces,potentiatingproteinrelease.
Notwith-standingtheimportanceof thesephysicochemical features,the
presenceofmucusandthemechanismofmucociliaryclearance
alsoneedtobeconsideredregardingthesuccessofnasaland
pul-monarytransmucosaldelivery(Dombu&Betbeder,2013;Marttin,
Schipper, Verhoef,&Merkus, 1998).Nanoparticles described in
thisworkareexpectedtoexhibitbioadhesivepropertiestosome
extent,duetothechitosancontent.Besidestheproperchitosan
abilitytoadheretobiologicalsubstrates(Du,Cai,&Zhai,2014;Lehr,
Bouwstra,Schacht,&Junginger,1992),chitosan-based
nanoparti-cleshavealsodemonstratedthesamecapacityinseveraloccasions
(Bernkop-Schnürch,Weithaler,Albrecht,&Greimel,2006;Sandri
et al., 2010). This will possibly improve the carrier residence
timeclosetotheepithelia,potentiatingdrugabsorption(Dombu
&Betbeder, 2013;Marttinetal.,1998).Additionally,
nanoparti-cleshavebeenreportedtoavoidordelaymucociliaryclearance,
althoughthisabilityishighlydependentontheirsizeandismore
relevantforparticlesbelow100nm(Oberdörster,Oberdörster,&
Oberdörster,2005;Sung,Pulliam,&Edwards,2007).
It is alsoobserved in the tablethat the inclusion of TPP in
theformulationincreasesthenanoparticleproductionyield,while
maintainingthe encapsulation efficiency,which is around50%.
A great difference is observed in loading capacity, which is of
70%forCS/CRG/TPP=4/1/0andapproximately30%for4/1/1.This
differenceisexplainedbythefactthat,whilebothformulations
encapsulateasimilaramountofprotein,thenanoparticles
contain-ingTPPdisplayaconsiderablyhigherproductionyield.Therefore,
asviewedinEq.(3),thereisthesameamountofproteindistributed
byahigheramountoftotalsolids,therebyresultinginalowervalue
ofloadingcapacity.Unloadednanoparticlesdisplaysomewhat
dif-ferentphysicochemicalcharacteristics,4/1/0nanoparticleshaving
491nmand+78mVand4/1/1nanoparticlesdisplayinga sizeof
208nmand+47mV(datanotshown).
3.2. Evaluationofnanoparticlestabilityinpresenceoflysozyme
Lysozyme is an enzyme that is present in mucosal
sur-faces,includingthenasaland pulmonary(Konstan etal.,1981;
Muzzarelli, 1997), which exhibits the ability to cleave -(1–4)
glycosidicbondsofchitosan(Muzzarelli,1997).Therefore,taking
into account the high content of chitosan present in the
pro-posednanoparticles,evaluatingtheirbehaviourinpresenceofthis
enzymeisimportantregardingafutureinterpretationofresults,
suchasthoseobtainedinvivo.Toperformtheevaluation,
nanopar-ticleswereincubatedwithlysozyme(0.2and0.8mg/mL)at37◦C
andtheirsizeandzetapotentialweremonitoredalongtime.The
enzymeconcentrationof0.2mg/mLwasusedtakingintoaccount
indications foundin the literature regarding physiological
con-centrationsoftheenzyme(Konstanetal.,1981).Furthermore,a
concentrationof0.8mg/mLwaschosentoinvestigatethe
nanopar-ticle behaviour in extreme conditions, as previously reported
(Grenhaetal.,2005).
AsobservedinFig.2,theformulationofnanoparticles
with-outTPP(CS/CRG)showedatendencyforsizedecreasealongtime.
When lysozyme was present at a concentration of 0.2mg/mL,
thedecreasewasnotsignificant,ashighstandarddeviationsare
obtained. However, at 0.8mg/mL a strong and significant size
decrease(p<0.05)occursupto60minofincubation,althoughafter
that a suddenincrease in size is observed,inverting thetrend.
Thisisprobablyduetoaggregation,asaconcomitantincreasein
thestandarddeviationofthemeansizeisobserved,indicatinga
greatdispersionofsizes.Zetapotential,inturn,remainedstable
duringtheassay(datanotshown).Interestingly,theformulation
containingTPPwasnotaffectedbythepresenceoftheenzyme,
nosignificantsizereductionbeingobservedindependentlyofthe
concentrationoflysozyme.Thisbehaviourrevealsasomewhat
pro-tectingeffectattributedbyTPP.
Anabsenceofeffectoftheenzymeonchitosan-based
nanopar-ticles (alsocontainingTPP)incubated insimilarconditions was
previouslyreportedinanotherstudy(Vila,Sánchez,Tobío,Calvo,&
Alonso,2002).ItispossiblethattheinclusionofTPP,whichactsas
cross-linker,preventsoratleastmodifieschitosanexposure,thus
notenablinganeasyandrapidenzymaticdegradationasisseenfor
nanoparticlesdevoidofTPP.
3.3. Evaluationofnanoparticlestabilityuponfreeze-drying
When nanocarriers are formulated as aqueous suspensions,
bothphysical(aggregation/particlefusion)andchemical
(hydroly-sisofpolymerandchemicalreactivity)instabilityphenomenaare
knowntoappearatsomepoint(Abdelwahedetal.,2006;Chacón,
Molpeceres,Berges,Guzmán,&Aberturas,1999;Kumar, Shafiq, & Malhotra, 2012), limiting nanoparticle applications (Sameti
Fig. 1.(A) TEM microphotograph of BSA-loaded CS/CRG/TPP (4/1/1, w/w) nanoparticles; (B) SEM microphotograph of microspheres composed of manni-tol/nanoparticles=80/20(w/w). 0 30 60 90 120 150 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 si ze ( % of ini tia l)
Time of incubation (min)
0 30 60 90 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Siz e ( % of ini tia l)
Time of incubation (min) A
B
Fig.2.SizeevolutionasafunctionoftimeuponincubationofCS/CRG/TPP nanopar-ticles()massratio4/1/0and()massratio4/1/1,with(A)0.2mg/mLand(B) 0.8mg/mLlysozyme,at37◦C(mean±SD,n=3).
etal.,2003;Wuetal.,2011).AqueoussuspensionsofCS/CRG/TPP
nanoparticleswerereportedinapreviousworktoremainstable
forupto9months,thepresenceofTPPintheformulation
demon-stratingtohaveasignificantroleinthiseffect(Rodrigues,Rosada
Costa,etal.,2012).However,thepreferenceinstoringand
trans-portingproductsindrystate,hasledtothedecisionofdeveloping
alyophilisedformulation.Regardingthepresentwork,itis
impor-tanttorecallthatanasalformulationofnanoparticleswillinvolvea
suspension,whilemicroencapsulatednanoparticles(drypowders)
areproposedforlungdelivery.Still,inthelattercasetheremightbe
atimeperiodbetweennanoparticleproductionand
microencapsu-lationwherealyophilisedformofnanoparticleswillbebeneficial
forstorage.
Freeze-dryinghasbeenconsideredanadequatetechniqueto
improvethelong-termstabilityofcolloidalnanoparticles.
Never-theless,itisacomplexprocessthatrequiresamajoroptimisation
of the inherent conditions. Many parameters of the
formula-tion/processmaydecidethesuccessoffreeze-drying(Abdelwahed
etal.,2006).Inthisstudy,nanoparticleswerefreeze-driedusing
differentsugarsascryoprotectants,atvariedconcentrations.The
concentration of nanoparticle suspensions was also tested as
variable.Thedirectfreeze-dryingofnanoparticles(without
cry-oprotectants)didnotpermitthepreservationoftheirproperties
(datanotshown),leadingtostrongaggregation.Thiseffectmight
beexplained byboth thehighconcentrationofparticles
under-goingthefreezingstepandthemechanicalstressinducedbyice
crystallisation(Abdelwahedetal.,2006;Vauthier&Bouchemal,
2009). This observation was reported in a previous work of
ourgroupfor nanoparticlescomposedof otherpolysaccharides
(Dionísio et al., 2013), as well as in other works available on
theliterature(Abdelwahedetal.,2006;Fuente,Seijo,&Alonso,
2008).
Thepurposeofthis studywasthus examiningtheeffects of
type ofcryoprotectant(sucrose,trehalose, lactoseand glucose),
cryoprotectantconcentration(5%and10%,w/w)andnanoparticle
concentration (1, 2 and 4mg/mL) on the nanoparticle
charac-teristicsuponreconstitutionwithwaterfromthecorresponding
lyophilisedpowder.
Fig.3displaysthevariationofnanoparticlesizewhen
compar-ingtheobtainedvalueafterreconstitutionoffreeze-driedmaterial
(Df)withthatinitiallydetermined(Di)beforethefreeze-drying
process.Asafirstapproach,unloadednanoparticleswereused.The
ANOVAexperimentrevealedthattheconcentrationofnanoparticle
suspensionstobefreeze-driedisthesoleparameterevidencinga
relevantandstatisticallysignificanteffectonthestabilityconferred
bythecryoprotectants.Inthis regard,theposthoctest
(Gowes-Howell)showsthatusingnanoparticleconcentrationsof2mg/mL
or4mg/mLleadstoahigherincreaseofnanoparticlesize(p<0.05)
Table1
Physicochemicalproperties,productionyieldandencapsulationdataofBSA-loadedCS/CRG/TPP(4/1/1,w/w)nanoparticles(mean±SD,n=3).
CS/CRG/TPPformulation Size(nm) Potential(mV) Productionyield(%) Encapsulationefficiency(%) Loadingcapacity(%)
4/1/0loaded 226±35 +27±5 15±2 51±12 70±18
Fig.3.SizevariationofCS/CRG/TPPnanoparticlesuponfreeze-dryingatdifferent concentrations,inpresenceof5%or10%sucrose,trehalose,lactoseandglucose,and furtherreconstitutioninwater(hydrodynamicdiameterofnanoparticlesbefore (Di)andafter(Df)freeze-drying).Resultsrepresentmean±SD(n=3);***indicates formationofprecipitate.
ascomparedwith1mg/mL,whichistheconcentrationpermitting
thedesiredmaintenanceofsizeafterfreeze-drying.
Zetapotentialvaluesdidnotevidencealterationsafter
freeze-drying inany of thetested conditions(datanot shown).Other
worksstudyingthefreeze-dryingofcomparableconcentrationsof
polysaccharide-basednanoparticleshavereportedgood
stabilisa-tionprovidedbythesameorsimilarcryoprotectants(delaFuente
etal.,2008;Dionísioetal.,2013;Hirsjärvi,Peltonen,&Hirvonen, 2009).
Althoughnottoastatisticallysignificantmanner,other
inter-pretationsmightbesuggestedbyFig.3.Regardingtheperformance
ofthedistinct cryoprotectants thatweretested, itis important
toobserve that lactose (atypical excipient used in lung
deliv-ery)revealed absolutelyinefficientas cryoprotectantagent,not
preventingparticleaggregationafterfreeze-drying.Thispoor
pro-tectiveeffectwasalsoobservedinapreviousworkofthegroupwith
otherpolysaccharide-basednanoparticles (Dionísio etal., 2013)
andwasfurtherreportedintheliterature,beingattributedtoan
ineffective protection during the freezingstep (Hirsjärvi et al.,
2009).Sucrose,glucoseandtrehalose(inthisorder)aresuggested
tohavebetterabilityas cryoprotectants,astheirpresence
pro-videdamoreadequatemaintenanceoftheinitialcharacteristics
ofnanoparticles,atleastundercertainconditions.Sucrose
main-tainedtheexactcharacteristicsofnanoparticleswhenusedat10%
(withthealreadymentionedexceptionofthe4mg/mL
concentra-tionofnanoparticles)orat5%whennanoparticlesarefreeze-dried
atthelowerconcentrationtested.Averysatisfactory
cryoprotec-tiveeffectprovidedbybothglucoseandsucrosewaspreviously
reportedbyourgroupregardingthestabilisationoftwo
formula-tionsofpullulan-basednanoparticles(sulfatedpullulan/chitosan
and carrageenan/aminatedpullulan) (Dionísio et al.,2013).The
concentrationofthecryoprotectantisalsoanimportant
param-eter tooptimise. In this regard, a content of 5% wasgenerally
foundtobe enoughto stabilise nanoparticlesfreeze-dried at a
concentrationof1mg/mL,while anincreaseto10%of
cryopro-tectantisneededwhenthenanoparticleconcentrationincreases
to2mg/mL.
Consideringtheresultsobtainedwithunloadednanoparticles,
BSA-loadednanoparticlesattheconcentrationof1and2mg/mL
were freeze-dried with 10% of both glucose and sucrose. The
physicochemical characteristics of the nanoparticles were still
maintained(datanotshown).However,itwaspreviouslyreferred
thattheuseofglucoseascryoprotectantofproteinformulations
should becautious becauseof its reducing character(Li et al.,
1996; Wang, 2000). Nevertheless, the freeze-drying of protein
nanocarriersinpresenceofglucosehasbeenreportedasefficient,
consideringboththephysicochemicalstabilityofthecarrierand
themaintenanceofproteinproperties(Freixeiroetal.,2013).In
anycase,acomprehensivereviewonthesubjectsuggeststhatany
evaluationshouldbeperformedona case-by-casebasis(Wang,
2000).
Thisstudyevidencesthesuitabilityofusingfreeze-drying to
obtainnanoparticlesina dryform,but itreinforces the
impor-tanceofcarefullyselectingandoptimisingtheconditionsofthe
freeze-dryingprocessinordertoachieveanoptimisedprotective
effect.
3.4. Microencapsulationofnanoparticles
Thesuccessofinhalableformulationsisprimarilydependenton
theiraerodynamicproperties,astheseinfluenceboththe
disper-sionandsedimentationpatternofthecarriers(Sungetal.,2007).
Whenasystemicactionisintended,thedrugcarriersshouldbe
smallenoughtopassthroughthemouth,throatandconducting
airwaysandreachthedeeplung,butnotsosmallthattheyfail
todepositandarebreathedoutagain.Inthiscontext,ithasbeen
consideredthatanaerodynamicdiameterbetween1and5mis
necessary(Bosquillon,Lombry,Préat,&Vanbever,2001),whichin
somecasesisevennarrowedto2–3m(Oberdörsteretal.,2005).
Aspecificconjugationbetweensizeanddensityofthecarriersis,
thus,necessary.Thepulmonaryadministrationofnanoparticlesis
severelyhinderedbytheirlowinertia,whichmakesalveolar
depo-sition practicallyimpossible, mainlyresulting in theexhalation
ofthecarriers(Sungetal.,2007).Thespray-dryingofCS-based
nanoparticleswasfirstreportedbyGrenhaetal.(2005)asa
strat-egytoendowthenanoparticleswiththeabilitytoreachthedeep
lung.Thisstrategywaslateronfollowedbyothergroups(Lietal.,
2010;Pourshahabetal.,2011).Inthepresentwork,the
microen-capsulationofCS/CRG/TPPnanoparticleswasapproachedtoobtain
adrugdeliverysystemthatpermittedefficientadministrationof
thedevelopednanocarriersaimedatthesystemicpulmonary
deliv-eryofproteins.Mannitolwasselectedtocomposethematrixof
microparticles,asithasdemonstratedtosimplyactascarrierof
nanoparticles,providing theirrelease uponreachingthealveoli
(Grenhaetal.,2005).
Microencapsulated nanoparticles were produced by
spray-drying a suspension of mannitol/nanoparticles (80/20, w/w),
evidencing a sphericalshape and a slightly corrugated surface,
as can be observed in Fig. 1B. The nanoparticle carriers were
determinedtohaveaFeretdiameterof2.3±0.6m,areal
den-sityof 1.44±0.01g/cm3 and a tapdensity of0.42±0.04g/cm3.
Theaerodynamicdiameterwasdeterminedtobe1.80±0.11m.
ComparableresultswerereportedformicroencapsulatedCS/TPP
nanoparticles(Grenhaetal.,2005),asystemthatalready
demon-strateditsefficacyinvivofortheadministrationofinsulin(Al-Qadi,
Grenha,Carrión-Recio,Seijo,&Remu ˜nán-López,2012).Good
indi-cationsarethusprovidedonthecapacityofthedevelopedsystem
toactas carrierof nanoparticlestothelungwiththeaimof a
systemicdeliveryofproteins.Nevertheless,usingthisapproachof
microencapsulatingthenanoparticlescouldpossiblyposeanextra
limitation,regardingthehighproportionofexcipientsthatneed
tobeusedand,consequently,theinherentlowerloading.Taking
intoaccount thatadministrationsofaround 160–180mg ofdry
powderhavebeenreported(Hoppentocht,Hagedoorn,Frijlink,&
deBoer,2014;Labiris,Holbrook,Chrystyn,Macleod,&Newhouse,
1999)andconsideringaproteinloadingof27%innanoparticles
andthe20%amountofnanoparticlesinthefinalmicroparticle
for-mulation,160mgwouldcarryapproximately9mgofprotein.This
amountisconsideredsuitableforthepurposeofobtaininga
ther-apeuticeffectandwillpossiblenotcompromisethesuccessofthe
formulation,whichwillobviouslybedependentonseveralother
3.5. Invitrobiocompatibilitystudy
Evaluatingthebiocompatibilityofdrugdeliveryformulationsis
nowadaysamandatoryaspecttoaddress(Gaspar&Duncan,2009).
Whileanaccuratedeterminationofthetoxicityofaformulation
canonlybedeterminedinvivo,avarietyofinvitrotoxicological
assays,performedinadequatelyselectedcelllines,mightprovide
veryusefulinformationandarewidelyacceptedasfirstindicators
(ISO,2009;Rodrigues,Dionísio,etal.,2012).Currentinternational
guidelinesrequiretheevaluationtobecontextualisedwitha
spe-cificrouteofadministrationanddoseofthematerial(Gaspar&
Duncan,2009).Itisalsoreferredthatpolymersandpolymer-based
carriersshouldberegardedasdifferententitiesand,thus,evaluated
separately(Aillon,Xie,El-Gendy,Berkland,&Forrest,2009;Gaspar
&Duncan,2009;Williams,2008).Thisisbasedontheassumption
thatthepropercarrierstructure,amongotherparameters,might
affectthefinaltoxicologicalbehaviour(Aillonetal.,2009;Gaspar
&Duncan,2009).
Toaddresstheabovementionedissues,theevaluationofthe
biocompatibilityofCS/CRG/TPPnanoparticlesandcorresponding
rawmaterials,wasperformedinthisstudybymeansofthree
dif-ferentassays,(1)themetabolicactivity(MTT),(2)theinflammatory
response(detectionofIL-6andIL-8)and(3)theepithelialintegrity
(measurementofTER).Calu-3andA549weretheselectedcelllines,
astheyarerepresentativeof therespiratory epithelia.Calu-3 is
animmortalisedcelllineobtainedfromlungadenocarcinomaand
hasbeenextensivelyusedinthestudyofformulationsdesigned
foreither nasalorpulmonary drugdelivery,as it isconsidered
amodeloftheepitheliumofbothregions(Casettarietal.,2010;
Graingeretal.,2006;Zhu,Chidekel,&Shaffer,2010).Importantly,
Calu-3cellsformtightjunctionsinvitro(Wintonetal.,1998)and,
undersuitablecultureconditions,exhibitinvivo-likebarrier
prop-erties(Graingeretal.,2006).A549isacelllinerepresentativeof
thealveolarepithelium,obtainedfromhumanalveolar
adenocar-cinoma,showingnoabilitytoformfunctionaltightjunctionsin
culture(Forbes&Ehrhardt,2005;Foster,Yazdanian,&Audus,2001;
Wintonetal.,1998).Consequently,itcannotbeusedinstudiesof
theepithelialbarrierintegrity,althoughthisdoesnotpreventtheir
useincytotoxicitystudies.
3.5.1. Evaluationofmetabolicactivity(MTTassay)
TheMTT assayprovidesan evaluation of thecell metabolic
activityupon exposuretothesamplesand hasbeenused very
frequentlyintheassessmentofdrugdeliverycarriers(Rodrigues,
Dionísio,etal.,2012).Itevaluatestheabilityofthecellstoreduce
theMTTreagenttotetrazoliumsalts,anactionthatisdependenton
mitochondrialmetabolism.Areductionofcellularmetabolic
activ-ityisgenerallyacceptedasanearlyindicatorofcellulardamage
(Scherließ,2011).
Inthiswork,A549andCalu-3cellswereculturedandexposed
todifferentconcentrationsofnanoparticlesandrawmaterialsfor
bothashort(3h)andamoreprolongedperiod(24h).Theexposure
for3hdidnotleadtosignificantdecreaseincellviability,with
val-uesremainingcloseto90–100%inallcases.Theonlyexception
occurredforA549cellsexposedtochitosan(datanotshown),an
effectcommentedlater.Incontrast,theprolongationofexposure
upto24hinducessomevariabilityoncellviability.Inthismanner,
forthecontacttimeof24hafactorialdesignwasapproachedto
examinetheeffectofsampletype(rawmaterials/carrier
formula-tions;X1)andconcentration(X2)oncellviability(Y),foreachcell
line.Thetwofactors(X1,X2)oftheexperimentaldesignhavethree
levelseach,resultinginninefactor/levelcombinations.
Cellviabilityresultsobtainedupon24hexposurearedepicted
inFig.4(Calu-3cells)and5(A549cells).ForCalu-3cells,an
unbal-ancedFDwasusedinthegroupofrawmaterialsandformulations.
Fortherawmaterials(Fig.4A),asignificanteffect(p<0.05)was
Fig.4. Calu-3cells viability measuredby the MTTassay after 24hexposure torawmaterials(A –CS:chitosan, CRG:carrageenan,TPP: tripolyphosphate) and nanoparticle-based formulations (B – NP: nanoparticles, BSA-NP: BSA-loadednanoparticles,microNP:microencapsulatednanoparticles).Datarepresent mean±SEM(n=3,sixreplicatesperexperimentateachconcentration).
detectedforeachofthemainfactors(X1andX2)andtheir
inter-action(X1*X2).ThemostrelevantobservationisthatTPPinduced
a greater decreaseof cellviability ascompared to CSand CRG
(p<0.05).
With respect to the formulations, the factorial experiment
revealsthatonlyX1(typeofmaterials)andthetwo-way
interac-tionX1*X2arestatisticallysignificant(p<0.05).Althoughthelowest
viabilityinducedbyrawmaterialswasobservedforthehighest
concentrationofTPP(1.0mg/mL,Fig.4A),cellviabilityupon
con-tactwithCS/CRG/TPPnanoparticleswasabove95%inallinstances
(Fig.4B),noconcentration-dependenteffectbeingobserved.Inthis
manner,asacellviabilityof70%isthethresholdbeyondwhicha
cytotoxiceffectisconsideredtooccuraccordingtoISO10993-5
(ISO,2009),theobservedeffectsaredevoidofphysiological
rele-vance.ThisindicatesthatCalu-3cellsdonotevidenceaparticular
sensitivitytoanyofthetestedsamples,eitherrawmaterialsor
nanoparticle-basedformulations,atthetestedconcentrations.
InA549cells,abalancedFDoftherawmaterialsshoweda
signif-icanteffectforbothmainfactors(X1andX2)andtheirinteraction
(X1*X2).AmongrawmaterialsonlyCRGandTPPshowasignificant
differencebetweentheconcentrationlevels(p<0.05),cellviability
decreasingwithincreasingconcentrations,particularlyatthe
con-centrationof1mg/mL(Fig.5A).Nevertheless,cellviabilitieswere
higherthan70% inallconditionstested forbothpolymers.The
mostdeleteriouseffectwasobservedforchitosan(p<0.05),which
inducedhighcytotoxicity,aswasalsodetectedupon3h,evenat
thelowerconcentrationof0.1mg/mL.
ThedifferentresponseofbothcelllinestoCSexposure(in
Fig. 5.A549 cells viability measured by the MTT assayafter 24h exposure torawmaterials(A –CS:chitosan, CRG:carrageenan,TPP: tripolyphosphate) and nanoparticle-based formulations (B – NP: nanoparticles, BSA-NP: BSA-loadednanoparticles,microNP:microencapsulatednanoparticles).Datarepresent mean±SEM(n=3,sixreplicatesperexperimentateachconcentration).
withthedifferentstructuresevidencedbyCalu-3andA549cellsin
cultureandwiththeirsensitivitytopHalterations.Infact,while
Calu-3 cells are rounder, A549 cells growaccording to a more
extendedprofile,ascanbeeasilyseeninATCCwebpage(Collection,
2012).Chitosanusedinthisworkisabaseand,therefore,is
dis-solvedinaceticacid(pHaround3.2)toassemblethenanoparticles.
Thesamesolutionwasusedintheassay,althoughitwas
previ-ouslydilutedwithCCM. Uponadditiontothecelllayer,itwas
observedonthemicroscopethatA549cells begintodetach,an
effectnot perceivedforCalu-3 cells. Therefore,thecells are no
longerattachedtotheplateand areeasilyremovedduringthe
washingstepsevenbeforetheMTTreagentisadded,not
permit-tinga reliablemeasure ofthemetabolic activity.Thisindicates
thattheseresultsshouldbetakenwithprecaution.Importantly,
althoughtherearenotmanystudiestestingchitosansolutionsin
A549cells,theliteraturereportsanabsenceofoverttoxicityofthe
polymerinthiscelllineatconcentrationssimilartothoseusedin
thisstudy,althoughadifferentchitosanpolymer(regarding
molec-ularweightandsalt)wasused(Huang,Khor,&Lim,2004).
ThebehaviourofA549cellsregardingthetesteddrugdelivery
systemswasgenerallysimilartothatofCalu-3cells,evidencing
averyfavourableprofile.ThestatisticaldetailsoftheFDshowed
thatbothmaineffects(X1andX2)andtheirinteraction(X1*X2)are
significant(p<0.05),theinteractionbeingappreciatedinFig.5B.
Althoughwithslightvariations,cellviabilitywasabove80%inall
cases.Nevertheless,itisobservedthatmicroencapsulated
nanopar-ticlesarethosecausingthemoreamenableeffect.
Asawhole,theseresultsindicatethatneithertheloadingofBSA
innanoparticlesnorthemicroencapsulationprocessinduced
phys-iologicallyrelevantalterationsontheresponseofthecellstothe
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 CS/CRG CS/CRG/TPP Micro NP LPS IL am ount (% of c ont ro l) IL-6 IL-8
Fig.6.IL-6(greybars)andIL-8(whitebars)secretionbyCalu-3cellsexposedfor 24htoCS/CRGandCS/CRG/TPPnanoparticles,microNPandlipopolysaccharide.Data showedas%ofreleasecomparingtocontrol(mean±SD,n=3).
systems.NostudiesregardingtheeffectofCS/CRG/TPP
nanopar-ticlesoncellviabilitywerereportedbefore,thushamperingthe
comparisonofthepresentresultswithothers.Themostsimilar
studiesreported theabsenceof overt toxicity ofeither CS/CRG
nanoparticlesinL929fibroblastsattheconcentrationof1mg/mL
(Grenhaetal.,2010)orCS/TPPnanoparticlesinCalu-3andA549
cells(Grenhaetal.,2007),whileseveralotherformulationsof
CS-basednanoparticleswerealsoreportedtonotinduceacytotoxic
effectindifferentcelllines(Caban,Capan,Couvreur,&Dalkara,
2012;Dionísioetal.,2013;Oliveira,Silva,Bitoque,Silva,&Rosada Costa,2013).
Thefindingsobtainedinthis workforallnanoparticle-based
formulations in both respiratory cell lines are consideredgood
indicatorsofbiocompatibility.However,theevaluationofa
bio-compatibilityprofiledemandstheuseofcomplementaryassays
that assessother aspectsof cellresponse, which iscertainly of
importancetoestablishafinaltendency.
3.5.2. Determinationofinflammatoryresponse
Inparallelwiththeevaluationofcellviability,theabilityofthe
carrierstoinduceaninflammatoryresponseuponcontactwiththe
cellshasalsobeenusedasanindicatorofbiocompatibility(Lim,
Yaacob, Ismail,& Halim,2010; McCarthy, Inkielewicz-St ˛epniak, Corbalan,&Radomski,2012;Muraetal.,2011).Theevaluationof
sucharesponsemight beperformedbyquantifyingtherelease
ofinflammatorymarkersbythecellsuponexposuretothedrug
deliverysystems.IL-6andIL-8aretwocytokinessuitableforthis
end,asIL-6isresponsibleforneutrophilactivationandIL-8isa
chemotacticagentforinflammatorycells(Lewis&McGee,1992).
In this assay,theeffectof thethree nanoparticle-based
car-riers (CS/CRG/TPP nanoparticles, BSA-loaded nanoparticles and
microencapsulated nanoparticles) was evaluated regarding the
induction ofan inflammatory phenotypein theCalu-3 cells by
meansofthedeterminationofreleasedIL-6andIL-8.Theobtained
resultsaredepictedinFig.6.Theassessmentwasconductedupon
24hexposuretothedrugdeliverysystems(1.0mg/mL)usingLPS
asapositivecontrol(10g/mL)andCCMasanegativecontrol.The
amountofcytokinesreleasedinresponsetoCCMwasconsidered
100%andalltheotherresultsarepresentedwithrespecttothat
value.Asexpected,abasalconcentrationofcytokinesinthe
super-natantwasdetectedincontrolcells (incubatedonly withCCM)
(Grainger,Greenwell,Martin,&Forbes,2009;Muraetal.,2011)
andIL-8wassecretedatahigherconcentrationthanIL-6(Mura
etal.,2011;Zhuetal.,2010).
Remarkably, no significant effect was elicited by either
CS/CRG/TPPnanoparticlesorthemicroencapsulatedcounterparts
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 TE R (% of co nt rol) Time (h)
Fig.7. Transepithelialelectricalresistance(TER)ofCalu-3celllayersupon incu-bation with CS/CRG/TPP nanoparticle suspension (1.0mg/mL). Data represent mean±SEMofthreeexperiments(n=3perexperiment).
didnotdifferbetweenthetreatmentgroups,indicatinganabsence
ofeffectofthemicroencapsulationprocess.
NanoparticlesproducedwithoutTPPwerealsotestedas
con-trols,evidencing a response verysimilar tothat ofCS/CRG/TPP
nanoparticles,whichindicatesthattheinclusionofTPPdoesnot
induceadifferenteffect.Finally,asignificantincreaseintherelease
ofbothcytokineswasonlyfoundupontheexposuretoLPS
(approx-imately220%forIL-8and360%forIL-6;p<0.05).Thiseffectwas
expected,asLPSisknowntoinduceaninflammatoryresponse,
cor-respondingtoreportedfindings(Alfaro-Morenoetal.,2009;Mura
etal.,2011).
3.5.3. Evaluationofepithelialintegrity
Intercellularstructuresarecrucialforepithelialdevelopment
andfunction.Tightjunctionsarethemostrestrictiveintercellular
junctions,formingacontinuousbandwhichcompletely
circum-ventstheperipheryofepithelialcellsatthemucosalsurface(Matter
&Balda,2003).Asmentionedabove,andcontrarytoA549cells,
Calu-3cellshavetheabilitytoformtightjunctionsinvitro,
display-ingthepropertiescharacteristicofanepithelialbarrier(Grainger
etal.,2006).
Inthisstudy,Calu-3cellswereexposedtoCS/CRG/TPP
nanopar-ticles at 1mg/mL to determinethe effect of the drugdelivery
systemontheepithelialintegrity,asa complementary
biocom-patibilityindicator.TheTERwascontinuouslymonitoredfor48h
andtheresultsareshowninFig.7.ItisobservedthattheTERdid
notsuffersignificantalterationsaftertreatmentwith
nanoparti-clesoveraperiodof48h.Althoughnotstatisticallysignificant,a
slightdecreaseofapproximately10%withrespecttocontrolwas
observedatearlytimepoints,butat4htheTERreached100%again
andsurpassedthatvalueatlatertimes.
NosimilarresultswerefoundonCalu-3cells,butanincrease
inTERhasbeenreportedinCaco-2cells (intestinalepithelium)
asaresponseof thecells toanexternalstimulation(Klingberg,
Pedersen,Cencic,&Budde,2005;Sonnier,Bailey,Pritts,&Lentsch,
2011),inonecasebeingassociatedwitharesponsetoan
inflam-matorystimulus(Sonnieretal.,2011).Nevertheless,inourstudy
thiscorrelationcannotbeestablishedasnosignificant
inflamma-toryresponsewasobtaineduponcontactwiththenanoparticles,
asevidencedabove.Ontheotherside,althoughadecreaseinTER
wasobservedinmanyoccasionswithchitosansolutionsinseveral
epithelialcelllinesincludingtheCalu-3(Florea,Thanou,Junginger,
&Borchard,2006;Portero,Remu ˜nán-López,&Nielsen,2002;Smith, Wood,&Dornish,2004), anabsenceofeffectofchitosan-based
nanoparticlesis alsodescribed in theliterature(Behrens, Pena,
Alonso,&Kissel,2002;Grenhaetal.,2007).Therefore,this
obser-vationcomprises anextraindicationonthebiocompatibilityof
CS/CRG/TPPnanoparticles.
Althoughtheobtainedresultsaregoodindicatorsthatno
dele-teriouseffects aretobeexpected forshort-termcontact ofthe
pulmonaryornasalmucosawiththedeveloped nanocarriers,it
isimportanttorecallthattheeffectsofaprolonged
administra-tionalsorequireattention.Inthisregard,therapidmucusturnover
inthenasalmucosacertainlypreventsnanoparticleaccumulation,
butthatwillnotbethecaseinpulmonarydelivery,wherethis
con-cerninunavoidable.Theconsequencesoflong-termexpositionto
particulatesarequiteunknown(Dombu&Betbeder,2013),buta
retentionhalf-timeofapproximately700dayswasreportedfor
humans(Oberdörsteretal.,2005).Withtheirabilitytoevade
spe-cificdefencemechanisms,onceinthelungnanoparticlesmight
eitheraccumulatein thelung tissue,causing inflammationthat
cantriggermoresevereeffects,ortheycantranslocatefor
extra-pulmonaryregions,whichisalsoamatterofgreatconcern.This
clearlyevidencestheurgentneedofextrastudiesaddressingthe
raisedconcerns,whicharelackingintheliterature.Itisofutmost
relevancetodeterminethefateofnanoparticleswhenincontact
withrespiratoryepithelia,thusenablinganadequaterisk
assess-mentand,hopefully,theestablishmentofnanoparticlesinclinicto
becomeareality.
4. Conclusion
ThisworkdemonstratesthesuitabilityofCS/CRG/TPP
nanopar-ticlesascarriersforanapplicationinpulmonaryandnasaldrug
delivery, with a particular emphasis on their biocompatibility
potential. Apart from the ability to associate a model
macro-molecule, BSA, the nanoparticlesdemonstrated to be stable in
presence of an amount of lysozyme simulating in vivo
condi-tions.Thenanocarriersalsoevidencedstabilityuponfreeze-drying
in presenceof glucoseor sucrose, usedascryoprotectants. The
protein-loaded nanoparticles were successfully incorporated in
microspheresbymeansofaspray-dryingprocess,resultingina
drypowderwithsuitablepropertiesforlungdelivery.Moreover,
thedevelopedcarriersexhibitedlowornegligibletoxicityin
con-tactwithtwo respiratorycell linesrepresenting boththe nasal
andpulmonaryepithelium,asdemonstratedbytheeffectsoncell
metabolicactivityandtransepithelialelectricalresistance.These
findingswerereinforcedbytheobservationofnoinflammatory
responsegeneratedupon24hofexposureofthecellstothe
car-riers.Altogether,theseresultsareanencouragingindicatorofthe
biocompatibilityandsafetyofCS/CRG/TPPnanoparticlesregarding
nasalandpulmonarydelivery,makingthemsuitablecandidatesfor
theseapplications.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Portuguese funding
throughFCT–Fundac¸ãopara aCiência eaTecnologia,projects
PTDC/SAU-FCF/100291/2008,PTDC/DTP-FTO/0094/2012and
PEst-OE/EQB/LA0023/2013, as well as by the Spanish Government
(ISCIII,AcciónEstratégicadeSalud,PS09/00816).ResearchofClara
CordeiroissupportedbyFCTprojectPEst-OE/MAT/UI0006/2014.
SusanaRodriguesacknowledgesherPhDscholarshipfromFCT
(ref-erenceSFRH/BD/52426/2013),aswellasaShareBiotechmobility
grant.
References
Abdelwahed,W.,Degobert,G.,Stainmesse,S.,&Fessi,H.(2006).Freeze-dryingof nanoparticles:Formulation,processandstorageconsiderations.AdvancedDrug DeliveryReviews,58(15),1688–1713.
Aillon,K.L.,Xie,Y.,El-Gendy,N.,Berkland,C.J.,&Forrest,M.L.(2009).Effectsof nano-materialphysicochemicalpropertiesoninvivotoxicity.AdvancedDrugDelivery Reviews,61(6),457–466.
Al-Qadi,S.,Grenha,A.,Carrión-Recio,D.,Seijo,B.,&Remu ˜nán-López,C.(2012).
Microencapsulated chitosannanoparticles forpulmonary proteindelivery: Invivoevaluationofinsulin-loadedformulations.JournalofControlledRelease, 157,383–390.