• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Int. braz j urol. vol.38 número3

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Int. braz j urol. vol.38 número3"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texto

(1)

432

VIDEO SECTION

Single Port Transvesical Prostatectomy

_______________________________________________

Fabio C. Vicentini, Marcelo Hisano, Tulio S. Agresta, Claudio B. Murta, Joaquim F. A. Claro

Centro de Referência da Saúde do Homem, Hospital de Transplantes do Estado de São Paulo, SP, Brazil

ABSTRACT

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Purpose: To describe a case of a transvesical prostatectomy performed by a single port technique.

Patient and Methods: JLS, 64y, diabetic and hypertense, under treatment of LUTS for 8 years with 4mg doxazosin and 5mg finasteride. The IPSS score was 26. The digital rectal exam showed a more than 60g benign prostate. The Body Mass Index was 28.9. The total PSA was 5.4ng/mL and the free/total PSA was 22%. A 12-fragments prostate biopsy showed BPH. The sonography revealed a 106g prostate and the maximum urinary flow was 12 ml/s. The patient was under general anesthesia and was positioned in dorsal decubitus with Trendelemburg. The bladder was filled until that a bexigoma was visible. A 2 cm longitudinal infra-umbelical incision was done. The Gel Point Single Port System (Applied, Ca, USA) was placed inside the bladder and the pneumovesicum was done until 10mmHg. A peri-bladder neck incision was done and the adenoma dissection was performed until its remotion. The hemostasia was done under vision. A 3-way 24-Fr Foley catheter and an 8-Fr plastic catheter were placed inside the bladder. The adenoma was removed and the bladder and the abdominal wall were closed.

Results: The procedure took 55 minutes and the blood loss was 180 ml. The patient evolved uneventfully, the bladder irrigation stayed for 24 h, the hemoglobin drop was 2.4g/dL and the patient was discharge after 36 hours. The urethral catheters stayed for 5 days. The postoperative IPSS was 6 and the maximum flow was 26 ml/s.

Conclusion: The surgery was safe and effective, showing that the single port transvesical prostatectomy can be an option in the surgical treatment of large prostates.

ARTICLE INFO

Available at: www.brazjurol.com.br/videos/may_june_2012/Vicentini_432_433video.htm

Int Braz J Urol. 2012; 38 (Video #4): 432-433

________________

Submitted for publication: February 15, 2012

________________

Accepted after revision: May 12, 2012

______________________ Correspondence address:

Dr. Fabio C. Vicentini Centro de Referência da Saúde do Homem, Hospital de Transplantes do Estado de Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Rua Dr. Alceu de Campos Rodrigues, 46 / 21 Sao Paulo, SP, 04544-000, Brazil E-mail: fabio@drfabiovicentini.com.br

(2)

433

IBJU|VIDEO SECTION

EDITORIAL COMMENT

In this video by Vicentini et al., the authors employ a novel single port transvesical approach for the surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). I applaud the authors on em-ploying such a well suited minimally invasive surgical approach to BPH refractory to current medical therapies. As a host of alternate surgical therapies arise for BPH including Holmium-YAG laser enucleation/vaporization and Greenlight la-ser vaporization, the ultimate question is which one provides the best outcomes in terms of long-term improved urinary stream, minimal irritative post-treatment voiding symptoms, optimal sur-gical outcomes (i.e. quickest convalescence, less

perioperative pain, decreased blood loss/necessity for blood transfusion, and lowest risk of compli-cations), as well as the ever increasing concern of treatment specific healthcare cost. Clearly, this is a complex question which can’t be answered through a single video presentation or case series but will require multi-arm prospective studies to be conducted. I encourage the urological society at large to consider doing such studies because it is only though such efforts that we can ultimately answer the question of what is the best option. It is likely that certain patients may do better with one specific surgical option versus another based on the size of the gland, specific surgical anatomy e.g. prominent median lobe, and baseline irrita-tive voiding symptoms.

Dr. Philippe E. Spiess

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing partial nephrec- tomy at their institution and all subjects with endophytic tumors treated with anatrophic

Kuntz RM, Lehrich K: Transurethral holmium laser enucle- ation versus transvesical open enucleation for prostate adenoma greater than 100 gm.: a randomized prospective trial of

Das K, Cheah PY, Lim PL, Zain YB, Stephanie FC, Zhao Y, et al.: Shorter CAG repeats in androgen receptor and non-GG genotypes in prostate-specific antigen loci are associated

Their preoperative diagnosis was mullerian aplasia (16 cases), androgen insensitivity syndrome (12 cases) (5 cases were complete and 7 cases had incomplete androgen

The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of the kidney transplantation in patients put in priority in allocation owing to lack of access for dialysis and to

When the continuous artery anastomosis technique was used (from month 1 to month 7), the ischemia time differed among the groups of 30-day survival, thrombosis and kidney

There were no significant differences between the pain scores at the time of insertion of probe, during the biopsy or at the end of the procedure, between the patients receiving

In view of all these facts, our study was designed to determine the prevalence of precur- sor lesions of penile cancer, to establish the con- cordance among different