• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Ten-year performance of Influenzanet: ILI time series, risks, vaccine effects, and care-seeking behaviour

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Ten-year performance of Influenzanet: ILI time series, risks, vaccine effects, and care-seeking behaviour"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texto

(1)

ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect

Epidemics

jo u rn al h om ep age : w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / e p i d e m i c s

Ten-year

performance

of

Influenzanet:

ILI

time

series,

risks,

vaccine

effects,

and

care-seeking

behaviour

Sander

P.

van

Noort

1,∗

,

Cláudia

T.

Codec¸

o

1,2

,

Carl

E.

Koppeschaar

3

,

Marc

van

Ranst

4

,

Daniela

Paolotti

5

,

M.

Gabriela

M.

Gomes

1

1InstitutoGulbenkiandeCiência,Oeiras,Portugal 2OswaldoCruzFoundation,RiodeJaneiro,Brazil

3DeGroteGriepmeting/ScienceinAction,Amsterdam,TheNetherlands 4RegaInstituteforMedicalResearch,UniversityofLeuven,Leuven,Belgium 5ISIFoundation,Turin,Italy

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory: Received4January2014

Receivedinrevisedform27April2015 Accepted31May2015

Availableonline15June2015

Keywords: Syndromicsurveillance Influenza-likeillness Timeseries Riskfactors Vaccineeffectiveness

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Recent public health threats havepropelled major innovationson infectious diseasemonitoring, culminatingin thedevelopmentof innovativesyndromicsurveillancemethods. Influenzanetis an internet-basedsystemthatmonitorsinfluenza-likeillness(ILI)incohortsofself-reportingvolunteers inEuropeancountriessince2003.Weinvestigateandconfirmcoherencethroughthefirsttenyearsin comparisonwithILIdatafromtheEuropeanInfluenzaSurveillanceNetworkanddemonstrate country-specificbehaviourofparticipantswithILIregardingmedicalcareseeking.Usingregressionanalysis,we determinethatchronicdiseases,beingachild,livingwithchildren,beingfemale,smokingandpetsat home,areallindependentpredictorsofILIrisk,whereaspracticingsportsandwalkingorbicyclingfor locomotionareassociatedwithasmallriskreduction.Noeffectforusingpublictransportationorliving alonewasfound.Furthermore,wedeterminethevaccineeffectivenessforILIforeachseason.

©2015TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

1. Introduction

Recent concerns with emerging infectious diseases have exposeddeficienciesindiseasesurveillancesystemsandimpelled radical rethinking on how to monitor population health and detectanomaliesinrealtime(Butler,2006).Inthiscontext,new approachesinsyndromicsurveillance–thecollectionand inter-pretationof data for publichealth beforelaboratoryor clinical confirmationisavailable(Lazarusetal.,2001;Mandletal.,2004) – have emerged. Several systems are in evaluation, showing a largediversityofdatasourcesandmethodologiesemployed,such as telephone-based health information services (Cooper et al., 2008),automatedmedicalrecords(Lazarusetal.,2001;vanden Wijngaardetal.,2008),pharmacysalesandabsenteeism(Chretien et al., 2008), queries to online search engines (Ginsberg et al., 2009),andtelephone-basedself-reportingincohortsofrandomly selectedparticipants(Merketal.,2013;Rehnetal.,2014). Syn-dromicsurveillanceiscomplementarytotraditionalpublichealth

∗ Correspondingauthorat:InstitutodeMatemáticaeEstatísticadaUniversidade deSãoPaulo,RuadoMatão,1010,CEP05508-090SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil.

E-mailaddress:[email protected](S.P.vanNoort).

surveillanceindiseasereporting(Henning,2004;Lipsitchetal., 2009).

Influenzanetisamonitoringsystemforinfluenza-likeillness (ILI)in voluntarycohortsofinternet users.It wasinitially con-ceivedtomakescientificinformationaccessibletoabroadpublic andtokindlestudents’enthusiasmforscience,andwaslaunched intheNetherlandsandBelgium(www.degrotegriepmeting.nl)in 2003andinPortugal(www.gripenet.pt)in2005.Thesystemwas consecutively implemented in Italy (www.influweb.it)in 2008, UnitedKingdom(www.flusurvey.org.uk)in2009,Sweden(www. halsorapport.se) in 2011, France (www.grippenet.fr) and Spain (www.gripenet.es)in 2012, and Denmark (www.influmeter.dk) andIreland(www.flusurvey.ie)in2013.Similarsystemshavebeen implemented outside Europe,most notably in Australia (www. flutracking.net)in2007,Mexico(reporta.c3.org.mx)in2009,and theUnitedStates(www.flunearyou.com)in2011.

Basedonsingle-seasonanalysis,previousstudiesestablished good correlations between ILI incidences as determined by InfluenzanetandbytheclinicalsurveillancebysentinelGeneral Practitioners (GPs) as coordinated by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (Friesema et al., 2009; Marquetetal.,2006;vanNoortetal.,2007;Paolottietal.,2014; Vandendijcketal.,2013).TheabsoluteILIincidenceasreportedby http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2015.05.001

(2)

Influenzanetis,however,muchmoreconsistentacrosscountries accordingtoInfluenzanetthanreportedbytheECDC,dueto coun-tryspecificmedicalcareseekingratesanddisparitiesinILIcase definitions usedbyGPs in differentcountries(vanNoort etal., 2007).ThisuniformityinratesreportedacrossEuropeancountries facilitatesthegeographicalanalysisand modellingofepidemics (vanNoortetal.,2012).IntheUnitedKingdom(Eamesetal.,2012a) andFrance(Debinetal.,2014),thevaccineeffectivenessforILIhas beendeterminedforasingleseason.Byintegratingserologicaldata sources,ILIratesreportedbyInfluenzanethavebeenconvertedto estimatesofinfluenzaattackrates(Patterson-Lombaetal.,2014).

HereweaimtofurtherestablishtheInfluenzanetsystemasa validsentinelforILIsurveillance,byconfirmingthatboththe tim-ingandrelativeintensitiesofepidemicsareconsistentwiththose reportedbyECDC,andtheidentifiedriskfactorsforILIare consis-tentwiththoseinthepublishedliterature.Theanalysisisbased ondatacollectedoverthefirst10seasons(2003–2013)fromthe countriesinwhich Influenzanetwasimplementedforatleast5 seasons:theNetherlands,Belgium,Portugal,andItaly.Timeseries analysesareappliedtocompareILIincidencesfromInfluenzanet andECDC,whereasregressionanalysisisusedtodetermine indi-vidualriskfactorsbasedonpersonalcharacteristicsandvaccination status.Furthermore,basedonthehealthcareseekingbehaviouras reportedtoInfluenzanet,differencesinILIincidenceby Influen-zanetandECDCareexplained.

2. Method

2.1. Datacollection

Influenzanetparticipantsarerecruitedfromthegeneral popu-lationbycompletinganintakequestionnaireononeofthenational websites,containingvariousdemographicandlifestylequestions. Duringtheinfluenzaseason,participantsreceiveaweekly newslet-terbye-mailinwhichtheyaredirectedtoanonlinequestionnaire aboutanumberofsymptomsthattheymighthaveexperienced sincetheirlastreport.TheEthicsCommitteeofInstitutoGulbenkian deCiênciaapprovedthestudy.

2.2. Participants

Anactivepopulationofparticipantsisessentialforthe consis-tencyofthesystem.Animportantcornerstoneforsuccessisthe feedbackofinformationtokeeptheparticipantsinvolvedand moti-vated.Althoughthespecificrecruitmentstrategiesvarybetween countries(Bajardi etal., 2014), theytend tobebased onmass communication.Thewebsitescontainawealthofinformationon influenza,ILIandcommoncold,whiletheeducationalandscientific aimsoftheprojectareexplainedindirectmailingstoschools,in repeatedinterviewsontelevisionandradio,andinnewspapers. Schools areprovided witheducationalmaterial oninfluenzato promoteincorporationofideasofdiseasesurveillanceinscience classes.Atthebeginningofeachseason,allparticipantsfrom pre-viousseasonsaresentanemailinvitingthemtoparticipateagain bycompletinganintakequestionnaireforthenewseason.Basedon auniqueuserid,participantscanbetrackedovermultipleseasons. 2.3. Bias

Publichealthstatisticssuchasasthma,diabetesandinfluenza vaccinationratesintheInfluenzanetparticipantshavebeenshown tobe similar for the Dutch(Marquet et al.,2006) and Belgian (Vandendijck et al., 2013) populations. Although younger and olderagegroupsareunderrepresentedinInfluenzanet(Cantarelli etal., 2014),these differencesdidnot seemtohave animpact ontheobservedILItrends(vanNoortetal.,2007).Tominimize

theselectionbiasinrecruitingparticipantswhoalreadyhaveILI, anysymptomsthatstartedbeforeorontheregistrationdateare excludedfromtheanalysis.Onlyparticipantswhoparticipateat least3timesduringaseasonareincludedintheanalyses.

2.4. ILIincidence

ILIisdefinedastheacuteonset(withinafewhours)offever (ameasuredtemperatureof atleast38◦C),togetherwith mus-clepainorheadache,andcoughorsorethroat.Thedayoffever onsetdeterminesthedayofILIonset.Participantsareconsidered activebetweenregistrationdateandthedateoftheirlast com-pleted symptoms’questionnaire.ILIincidence isdeterminedby dividingthenumberofILIonsetsperweekbythenumberofactive participants.IfparticipantsfittheILIcasedefinitioninconsecutive questionnaires,thisisconsideredasasingleILIepisode.

2.5. EuropeanInfluenzaSurveillanceNetwork

TheclinicalsurveillanceofinfluenzaintheEuropeanInfluenza Surveillance Network (EISN, formally EISS), coordinated by the ECDC,isgenerallybasedonreportsmadebysentinelGPs.TheILI incidenceforeachcountryisdeterminedbythenumberofpatients whovisittheir(sentinel)GPandfitthe(country-specific)ILIcase definition(Aguileraetal.,2003),dividedbythetotalnumberof peopleassignedtotheparticipatingGPs.

2.6. Crosscorrelation

For each country, thecrosscorrelationbetweenILIincidence ratesasreportedbyECDCandInfluenzanetisdetermined.Since bothtimeseriesareautocorrelatedandshareacommonseasonal trend,thisdirectcrosscorrelationcouldgiveamisleading indica-tionoftheirrelationship(Bloometal.,2007).Therefore,bothtime seriesarealsoprewhitenedbyfittingseasonalARIMAmodelsusing theBox–Jenkinsapproach(Allard,1998),wherethemodelwith thelowestAkaikeinformationcriterionisselected(Hyndmanand Athanasopoulos,2014).Thedetrendedtimeseriesareobtainedby filteringeachtimeseriesbytheselectedmodel,andforeach coun-trythecrosscorrelationbetweenthedetrendedtimeseriesfrom InfluenzanetandECDCisdetermined.

Since the ILI incidence from Influenzanet is based on the reporteddayofonsetandtheILIincidencefromECDCis deter-minedbytheweekapatientvisitedtheirGP,itwouldbeexpected thatthereportedILIincidencefromInfluenzanetprecedestheILI incidenceasdeterminedbyECDC.SinceinInfluenzanetnotonly theweekofonsetbuttheactualdayisrecorded,theweeklyILI incidencefromInfluenzanetcanbeshiftedbysingledays,wherea shiftofzerodaysindicatesthattheILIincidencefrombothsystems iscomparedfortheperiodMonday-Sunday.

2.7. Medicalcareseekingbehaviour

Eachparticipant who reports (ILI)symptoms, isasked some follow-up questions, such as whetherthe participant visited a medicaldoctor.Thisallowsthedeterminationofthepercentage ofparticipantswithILIwhoseekmedicalcare.Sinceparticipants couldseekmedicalcareaftertheyhavereportedtheirsymptoms toInfluenzanet,a reportedvisit within15 daysaftera reported ILIonsetisstillconsidered.Sinceseason2011–2012,Influenzanet participantswhoreportedtohavevisitedamedicaldoctorarealso askedhowmanydayselapsedbetweentheonsetofsymptomsand thevisit.

(3)

2.8. Riskfactoranalysis

Weapplyalogistic regressionmodeltoexplorethe associa-tionbetweenseveralindividualcovariatesandtheoccurrenceofat leastoneILIepisodeduringaseason.Thesecovariatesareselected beforehand,consistingmostlyofcharacteristicswhichhavebeen identifiedinotherstudiesregardinginfluenzarisk,andsomeextra characteristicswhicharenotnormallyanalyzed.Mostcovariates areconsideredequalacrossallseasons:agegroup(<15,15–49, 50–64,65+),householdsituation(alone,withchildrenorwithonly adults),gender,chronicdisease(asthma,diabetes,heartdisease, and/orimmuno-compromised),smoking,sports(atleast1hper week),petsathome(dogs,cats,and/orbirds),andprimarymodeof dailylocomotion(bicycle/foot,car,orpublictransport).The covari-ate“riskgroup(others)”includesthoseparticipantswhoreportto belongtoariskgroup,butareyoungerthan65years(60inthe Netherlandssince2008)anddidnotreportanyofthechronic dis-eases.Theeffectofvaccinationisconsideredasaseason-dependent covariate.Fortheseason2009–2010,thevaccinestatusisbasedon thepandemicvaccine.Countryofresidenceandseason(indirectly) aretwoextracovariates.

OnlyILIonsetsduringtheweekswheninfluenzastrainswere circulatingin the populationare considered.These periods are definedforeachseasonandcountryastheweekswhenthe num-berofinfluenza-confirmedsamplesasreportedbyECDCwasat least15%ofthemaximumforthatseason(movingaverageover3 weeks)(SupplementaryFigureS13).Allparticipantsareconsidered independentbetweentwodifferentseasons,andparticipantswho werenotactiveforthecompleteinfluenzaperiodareexcluded. SinceInfluenzanetisacohortstudyinwhichhealthyindividuals (withoutILI)arerecruitedandthepossibleonsetofILIis moni-toredoverafixedperiodoftime,Influenzanetcandeterminethe riskratiosforallthecovariates.Foreachcovariateaunivariaterisk ratioisdetermined.Adjustedriskratiosaredeterminedbya mul-tivariatelog-binomialregressionmodel includingall globaland season-dependentcovariatesanalyzedbythegenerallinearmodel inRsoftware(RDevelopmentCoreTeam,2014).Thevariance infla-tionaryfactor(VIF)foreachcovariateisdeterminedtocheckfor collinearityinthemultivariateregressionmodel.

3. Results 3.1. ILIincidence

The ILI incidence as determined by Influenzanet correlates wellovermultipleseasonswiththeILIincidenceasreportedby ECDC(Fig.1).However,InfluenzanetmeasuresILIincidenceinall countriesonthesamescale,whiletheincidencesreportedbyECDC areingenerallowerandvaryinscalebetweencountries.

The crosscorrelation between the raw ILI incidences from InfluenzanetandECDCissignificant(Fig.2A,C,E,andG).TheILI incidencesshowahighlevelofautocorrelationandsomedegree ofseasonality(SupplementaryFiguresS5–S12A).Wefittedtoeach timeseriesaseasonalARIMAmodel(SupplementaryTableS1),and filteredthetimeseriesbyeachmodeltoobtainadetrendedtime series(SupplementaryFiguresS1–S4).Thedetrendedtimeseries arenolongerautocorrelated(SupplementaryFiguresS5–S12B),as confirmedbytheLjung–Boxtest(SupplementaryTableS1).The detrendedtimeseriesofInfluenzanetandECDCalsoshowa signif-icantlevelofcrosscorrelationatalagofzeroweeks(Fig.2B,D,F, andH),fortheNetherlands(0.38),Belgium(0.53),andItaly(0.29). 3.2. Medicalcareseekingbehaviour

ThepercentageofparticipantswithILIwhoseekedmedicalcare variesgreatlybycountry(Fig.3).Similardifferencesareobserved

Table1

Crosscorrelationbetween Influenzanetand ECDCfor daily lags basedonthe detrendedtimeseries(2003–2013).Valuesinboldindicatethecrosscorrelationat alagequaltothemediannumberofdaysbetweenILIonsetandvisittoamedical doctor.

Lag(days) Netherlands Belgium Portugal Italy

−7 0.33 0.34 0.27 −0.06 −6 0.40 0.42 0.23 −0.02 −5 0.40 0.45 0.32 0.09 −4 0.47 0.52 0.32 0.19 −3 0.46 0.50 0.35 0.24 −2 0.39 0.57 0.35 0.22 −1 0.32 0.57 0.42 0.24 0 0.38 0.53 0.38 0.29 1 0.34 0.46 0.22 0.24 2 0.35 0.44 0.22 0.20 3 0.34 0.37 0.24 0.18 4 0.31 0.40 0.13 0.16 5 0.35 0.32 0.17 0.17 6 0.34 0.24 0.06 0.16 7 0.19 0.24 0.15 0.18

inthenumberofdaysbetweentheonsetofsymptomsandvisiting

thedoctor (Fig.4).Theobservedpatternsdo notchangeifonly

workingadultparticipantsareconsideredintheanalysis. Thecrosscorrelationbetweenthedetrendedtimeseriesfrom InfluenzanetandECDCismaximumwhenashiftof4daysisapplied intheNetherlands,1–2daysinBelgium,1dayinPortugal,andno shiftinItaly(Table1).Thiscorrespondswellwiththemediandelay betweenILIonsetandseekingmedicalcareasreportedduringthe seasons2011–2013:4daysintheNetherlands,2daysinBelgium, 1dayinPortugal,and1dayinItaly.

3.3. Participation

TheNetherlandshasmostparticipants(onaverage19,491per season,ofwhich16,481completedatleast3symptoms’ question-naires),followedbyBelgium(6001;5072),Portugal(2871;1894), andItaly(1882;1219)(Fig.5).Thiscorrespondsto0.1%ofthe pop-ulationintheNetherlandsandBelgium(Flanders,sincebasically allparticipantsarefromFlanders),0.02%inPortugal,and0.003% inItaly. Ofallparticipantswho completedatleast3symptoms questionnairesduringaseason,intheNetherlands76±8% partici-patedagaininthefollowingseason,74±12%inBelgium,69±12% inPortugal,and70±4%inItaly.

3.4. Riskfactors

The univariate risk ratios are listed in the Supplementary material (Table S2), whereas the adjusted risk ratiosfrom the multivariateregressionarelistedinTable2.Thevariance infla-tionaryfactor(VIF)forthecovariatesvariesbetween1.0and2.7 (SupplementaryTableS2),reassuringthatmodelspecificationis not compromised by undesirable collinearities (O’Brien, 2007). McFadden’spseudoR-squaredforthefinalmodelfit(R2=0.035)

isrelativelylow,indicatingthatonlyasmallpartofthevariation inILIinfectionsisexplainedbythepresentedcovariates.The pri-maryriskfactorforacquiringaninfectionishavingcontactwithan infectiouspersonandthisisabsentfromtheseanalyses.

Accordingtotheadjustedriskratios,havingachronicdisease (asthma, diabetes, heart disease and/or immune-compromising condition), living with children, being female, belonging to a youngeragegroup,petsathome(catsand/ordogs),andbeinga smoker,wereallindependentpredictorsoftheriskofhavingat leastoneILIepisode duringa fluseason(Table2).A smallrisk reductionwasobservedinparticipantswhoprimarilyusebicycle orfootforlocomotion(comparedtoacar)andparticipantswho practicemorethan1hofsportsperweek.Nosignificanteffectwas

(4)

Fig.1. ILIincidenceforInfluenzanetandECDCfor(A)theNetherlands,(B)Belgium,(C)Portugaland(D)Italy.TheILIincidencebyInfluenzanetisdefinedasthenumberof ILIonsetsper100,000participant-weeks.TheverticalaxesfortheILIincidencearescaledbasedonalinearregressionbetweentheILIincidencesofInfluenzanetandECDC.

observedforparticipantswholivewithotheradults(comparedto livingalone),participantswhohavebirdsathome,andparticipants whousepublictransportation(comparedtousingacar).

Thevaccineeffectivenessforinfluenza-likeillnessvariesfrom seasontoseason.AsignificantreductioninILIduetovaccination wasobservedintheseasons2007–2008,2008–2009,2010–2011, and2012–2013,whilenosignificanteffectwasobservedinother seasons.Thevaccineeffectivenessforseason2009–2010ispossibly underestimated,sincethevaccineonlybecameavailablewhenthe ILIactivitywasalreadyepidemic.

4. Discussion

Basedonsingle-seasonanalysis,previousstudiesestablished excellent correlations betweenILI incidences as determinedby InfluenzanetandbyECDC(Friesemaetal.,2009;Marquetetal., 2006;vanNoortetal.,2007).Aquestionremainedonwhetherthis consistencywouldpersistformultiple-seasondatastreams.We showedthat during10 seasonsintheNetherlandsandBelgium (2003–2013),8seasonsinPortugal(2005–2013),and5seasonsin Italy(2008–2013),theILItrendsfromInfluenzanetandECDCare

consistentinbothtimingandrelativemagnitude,withasignificant crosscorrelationbetweenbothtimeseriesaslagsofzeroweeks.The signalfromInfluenzanetprecedesECDCbyafewdays, correspond-ingapproximatelytothemediannumberofdaysbetweenILIonset andseekingmedicalcare.However,thisdoesnotnecessaryindicate thatinreal-timemonitoringInfluenzanetwoulddetectILItrends earlier,sincethisdependsonwhenthedatabecomesavailableand thestatisticaluncertaintiesinthedata(vanNoort,2014).

Althoughbothtimeseriesarecorrelatedoverthefull10-year period,therearelocalizeddiscrepanciesbetweenthedatastreams, whichcouldbeattributedtothedifferentmethodologyand com-positionof thecohorts in both systems.As anexample, young childrenarelargelyunderrepresentedinInfluenzanet(vanNoort etal.,2007),whereasyoungchildrenvisitrelativelymoreoftena medicaldoctor.Thiscouldexplainwhyfortheseason2007–2008in Portugal,dominatedbytheinfluenzaBstrainaffectingmostly chil-dren,asmallepidemicwasreportedbyECDCwhichwentmostly undetectedbyInfluenzanet.Anotherlocaldiscrepancyisthe rel-ativelyhighILIincidenceasreportedbyECDCintheNetherlands duringthemonthsprecedingthe2009ILIpandemic,whichmight beattributedtoanincreaseinawarenessbymedicaldoctorsand

(5)

Fig.2.Cross-correlationbetweentheILIincidencesofInfluenzanetandECDCusingeithertherawILIincidences(leftpanel)orthedetrendedtimeseries(rightpanel)in(A andB)Netherlands,(CandD)Belgium,(EandF)Portugaland(GandH)Italy(2003–2013).

patientsduetoaglobalconcernaboutthenewH1N1influenza strain(Keramarouetal.,2011).

Thepresenceofmultipleindependentsourcesencouragesthe development of integrative methods that explore the specific strengthsofeachsystem(Reisetal.,2007).Havingmultiple inde-pendentsystemscoulduncoveraspectsofinfluenzatransmission

thatwould gounnoticedifonly onedatastreamwasavailable. Anothercross-countrydatasourceforILIincidencesisGoogleFlu Trends(Ginsbergetal.,2009),whichdeterminesILIincidencebased onthefrequencyofILI-relatedsearchterms.However,GoogleFlu Trendsisnotastrictlyindependentdatasource,sincetheir algo-rithmsrelyontheECDCdatastreamsforcalibration.

Fig.3.InfluenzanetparticipantswithILIwhovisitedamedicaldoctorspecifiedbycountry(2011–2013).ILIisdefinedastheacuteonset(withinafewhours)offever(a measuredtemperatureofatleast38◦C),togetherwithmusclepainorheadache,andcoughorsorethroat.

(6)

Fig.4.TimelagbetweenILIonsetandvisittomedicaldoctorin(A)Sweden,(B)UnitedKingdom,(C)theNetherlands,(D)Belgium,(E)France,(F)Spain,(G)Portugaland (H)Italy(2011–2013).ILIisdefinedastheacuteonset(withinafewhours)offever(ameasuredtemperatureofatleast38◦C),togetherwithmusclepainorheadache,and

coughorsorethroat.

Patterns in medical care seeking behavioursuggest cultural differencebetween northernand southern Europe. In southern Europe(France,Italy,Portugal,andSpain)participantsgenerally visitamedical doctorwithin1–2daysaftertheonset of symp-toms,whereasinnorthernEurope(Sweden,UnitedKingdom,and theNetherlands)participantsseekmedicalcaregenerallyonly5–7 daysaftertheonsetofsymptoms.Belgium (Flanders)seemsan exceptiontothesuggestedpattern, mostlikely because accord-ingtoBelgianlaw,anemployercanrequirefromtheiremployee amedical statementwithin24htojustifyworkabsenteeism.A similarpatternisobservedinthepercentageofparticipantswith ILIwhoseekmedicalcare,whichislowerinthenorthernEurope (exceptBelgium)thaninsouthernEurope.Thetwopatternscould beassociatedbyconsideringthatincountrieswhereparticipants waitlongerbeforeseekingmedicalcare,manyparticipantswould nolongerfeelsufficientlyilltowarrantavisittoamedicaldoctor. Thisvariationinmedicalcareseekingratesacrosscountriesis oneofthereasonswhyILIincidences reportedbyECDCcannot becompareddirectly(vanNoortetal.,2007).Variationsin med-icalcare seekingcouldalsoaffectthedetermined ILIincidence byECDCwithinacountry,ifcertainsubgroupsofthepopulation visitadoctoratdifferentrates.Influenzanetdoesnotonlyserve asanindependentsourceforILIactivity,butcouldalsobeusedto calibrateILIdataascollectedbyGPsentinelsystems(vanNoort, 2014).

AcrucialelementinthesuccessofInfluenzanet,ishavinga suffi-cientlylargecohortofparticipants.IntheNetherlands(onaverage 16,481activeparticipants),Belgium(5072),Portugal(1894),and Italy(1219)theInfluenzanetcohortwaslargeenoughtodetect similarILIepidemicsasECDCinallseasons,withtheexception of season2007–2008in Portugal.Larger cohortswould leadto lowerstatisticalnoisesuchthatepidemicscouldbedetectedearlier andevensmallILIepidemicscouldbedistinguishedfrom base-lineILIactivity.Furthermore,inlargercohorts,differentsubgroups, forexamplebasedonageorvaccinestatus,couldbemonitored

separately. Of all active participants during a certain season, 73±11%participatedagaininthefollowingseason.Althoughthis shows impressive loyalty of participants,each seasonan effort shouldbemadetorecruitnewparticipantstoatleastreplacethose whohaveleft.

RiskfactorsestimatedfromtheInfluenzanetcohort are con-sistentwiththeinfluenzaliterature.HigherriskofILIinchildren andinthoselivingwithchildrenwasobserved,inconsistencywith observationalstudies(Cauchemezetal.,2009;Montoand Ross, 1977;Monto,2004;Viboudetal.,2004).TheincreasedILIriskin womencomparedtomen,whichmaybeduetomoreintensive contactbetweenwomenandchildren,hasalsobeenpreviously rec-ognized(MontoandRoss,1977).Wefoundasignificantlyreduced riskofILIamongparticipantsover65.Thisisnotduethehigher vac-cineuptakeinseniors,sincevaccinestatusisalreadyincludedasa separatecovariateinthismultivariateanalysis.Seniorsare gener-allyconsideredariskgroupforinfluenza,notbecauseofahigher probabilityforinfection,butduetotheirgreaterriskfor compli-cations(Monto,2004).Havingachronicdisease,suchasasthma, diabetes, heart diseaseor an immune-compromising condition, wasastrongpredictorofILIintheInfluenzanetcohort.Peoplewith thesechronicdiseasesaregenerallyadvisedtotakeaninfluenza vaccine.Increasedriskofinfluenzahasbeenobservedinchildren withasthmainclinicalcohortstudies(Gordonetal.,2009),while diabetesisknowntobestronglyassociatedwithcomplicationsdue toinfluenzainfections(Irwinetal.,2001).AnincreasedriskofILI wasobservedamongtheInfluenzanetparticipantswhosmoke,as hasbeenconfirmedbyotherstudies(ArcaviandBenowitz,2004). TheInfluenzanetsystemisflexibletotheextentthatquestions ofinterestcaneasilybeaddedorremoved,allowingforthe esti-mationof riskfactorswhich arenot usuallyconsidered.In this study,wefoundasmallbutsignificantprotectiveeffectof walk-ingorbicyclingasaprimarymeansoflocomotionincomparison withtravellingbycar,whilenosignificantriskoftravellingby pub-lictransportationwasobserved,norinparticipantswholivewith

(7)

Fig.5. NumberofInfluenzanetparticipantswhocompletedatleast3symptoms’questionnairesin(A)theNetherlands,(B)Belgium,(C)Portugal,and(D)Italy.Theparticipants aredifferentiatedbytheseasoninwhichtheyregistered.InPortugalinseason2006–2007,inItalyinseason2010–2011,andinallcountriesinseason2011–2012anew databasestructurewasintroduced,providingaresetofparticipantids.

otheradultsincomparison withadultswholivealone. Asmall increase inrisk wasobserved in participantswhohave pets at home.Practicingsportsforatleastonehourperweekwas asso-ciatedwithasmallbutsignificantdecreaseontheILIrisk.

Notonlyextraquestionscouldbeincludedintheintake ques-tionnaire,entirenewquestionnairescouldbeaddedinparticular seasonsenabling further studies.A stress-related questionnaire releasedin theNetherlands in season2004–2005revealed sig-nificanttrendsbetweenstress/personalityand ILIself-reporting (Smolderen etal., 2007), and a simple questionnairerelated to contactbehaviour,showedthatchangesincontactpatternscould explainchangesindiseaseincidence(Eamesetal.,2012b).

In4outof10seasonsInfluenzanetestimatedasignificant reduc-tionin ILIdue tovaccination,whereas intheother seasonsno significanteffectwasobserved.Thedirecteffectivenessof vacci-nationvariedbetween 33%(22–42%) inseason2010–2011 and −10% (−28 to6%) in season 2004–2005. A relatively low vac-cineeffectivenessagainstILIistobeexpected,sincevaccination targetsspecificallytheinfluenzavirus, andnot other influenza-likeillnesses.Adouble-blind,randomized,placebo-controlledtrial

measuredwithinthesamecohortavaccineefficacyfor serologi-callyconfirmedinfluenzaofrespectively50%(1997/98)and86% (1998/99),butavaccineeffectivenessforILIof−10%(1997–1998) and33%(1998–1999)(Bridgesetal.,2000).Accordingtoalarge meta-studybasedon48reportsonvaccineeffectivenessinhealthy adults,inactivatedparenteralvaccineswere30%effectiveagainst ILI,and80%efficaciousagainstinfluenzawhenthevaccinematched thecirculatingstrainandcirculationwashigh,butthisdecreased toaneffectivenessagainstILIof12%andefficacyagainstinfluenza of50%whenitdidnot(Demichelietal.,2009).

Fortwoseasons(2003–2004and2004–2005)Influenzanet esti-matedanegativealthoughnon-significantvaccineeffectiveness. Bothseasonswerecharacterizedbyapoorvaccinematch(Belongia etal.,2009;Jinetal.,2005).Anegativevaccineeffectcanbedue tooriginalantigenicsin,thetendencyforantibodiesproducedin response toexposuretoinfluenzavaccineantigensto suppress thematurationofantibodieswithhighaffinitytotheactualvirus (Guptaetal.,2006).

Inanobservationalstudyofvaccineeffectiveness,any preexis-tingbiasbetweenvaccinatedandunvaccinatedparticipantscould

(8)

Table2

AdjustedriskfactorsandvaccineeffectivenessforILIintheNetherlands,Belgium, Portugal,andItaly(2003–2013).

Question Answer RR(adjusted)

Age <18 1.59(1.46–1.74)

18–49 *

50–64 0.82(0.78–0.86)

65+ 0.46(0.41–0.51)

Household Alone *

Onlywithadults 0.99(0.92–1.05)

Withchildren 1.31(1.22–1.40)

Gender Male *

Female 1.22(1.17–1.28)

Chronic diseases

Asthmaorlungdisease 1.58(1.47–1.69)

Diabetes 1.27(1.15–1.41)

Heartdisease 1.29(1.13–1.47)

Kidneydisorder 1.23(0.80–1.90)

Immune-compromised 1.23(1.02–1.49)

Riskgroup(other)a 1.23(1.06–1.41)

Smoking 1.16(1.10–1.22)

Pets Dogs 1.15(1.09–1.22)

Cats 1.07(1.02–1.12) Birds 1.03(0.94–1.13) Sports >1hperweek 0.95(0.90–1.00) Primarymeansof locomotion Bicycle/foot 0.95(0.90–1.00) Car * Publictransport 0.97(0.89–1.05) Vaccination 2003/04 1.07(0.78–1.47) 2004/05 1.10(0.94–1.28) 2005/06 0.97(0.83–1.12) 2006/07 1.00(0.86–1.15) 2007/08 0.81(0.70–0.94) 2008/09 0.80(0.71–0.90) 2009/10b 0.87(0.74–1.03) 2010/11 0.67(0.58–0.78) 2011/12 0.97(0.82–1.16) 2012/13 0.80(0.71–0.91) Dependentvariable:havingatleastoneILIepisodeduringaseason(influenza period).

aClassifiedbyGPasbelongingtoriskgroupduetofactorsnotspecifiedonthis

table.

bVaccinationforthenewH1N1pdmstrain.

distorttheresults.Aunivariateanalysis(SupplementaryTableS2) indicatesa10%higherILIreductioninvaccinatedparticipantsthan themultivariatestudy.However,withparticipantsover65yearsof agehavingalowerILIrateandarelativelyhighvaccinationrate,the multivariatemodelestimatesthatapartofthereductioninILIin vaccinatedparticipantsisduetotheirage.Althoughthe multivari-atelogisticregressionaimstocorrectforthesebiases,itispossible thatotherbiasesnotrepresentedbyanyoftheriskfactorslistedin Table2exist.

Acohortstudyof72,527seniorsover65yearsofagefollowed duringan8yearperiod,foundthatvaccinatedseniorsalreadyhada reducedriskofdeathandpneumoniahospitalizationintheperiods beforetheinfluenzaseason,andthattheriskreductionactually decreasedduringtheinfluenzaseason(Jacksonetal.,2006).Such apreferentialreceiptofvaccinebyrelativelyhealthyseniorscould leadtooverestimationofthevaccineeffectivenessinobservational studies.ItisplausiblethatmostelderlyInfluenzanetparticipants arerelativelyhealthyand thatthisselectionbiasislesspresent inInfluenzanet,leading torelativelylower estimatesofvaccine effectivenessthanintheaverageliterature.Becauseofglobal rec-ommendationsforinfluenzavaccination,placebo-controlledtrials, whichcouldclarifytheeffectsofinfluenzavaccinesinindividuals, arenolongerconsidered possibleonethicalgrounds(Jefferson etal.,2010).

SincetheInfluenzanetparticipantsarenotarandomsample oftheoverall population,careshouldbetakeninextrapolating the estimated risks tothe overall population in the respective countries.However,theobservedconsistencyinriskfactorsforILI betweenInfluenzanetandthosereportedbystudiesincommunity settingsfurtherestablishesthattheInfluenzanetpopulationisa valuablesentinelforILIsurveillanceinthepopulation,inaddition tothemeritsofengagingtheparticipantsinpublichealthresearch andpromotingriskawareness.

Thesystempresentedherestandsonaconceptforsyndromic surveillance that depends on intense activity in science com-munication, public awareness and sufficient levels of Internet penetration. It hasreportedILI activityin a consistent wayfor over 10 seasons in multiple countries. Influenzanet reports ILI trendsconsistentwithGPsentinelsurveillance(ECDC),andcan complement these systems by providing valuable information aboutmedicalcareseekingbehaviour.Basedonreported symp-toms,Influenzanetcanbeextendedtodetectdiseasesotherthan influenza,includingthoseindevelopingsettings.Influenzanetasan Internetmonitoringsystembasedonvoluntaryparticipantsmight thereforedevelopintoanimportantweapontofightinfluenzaas wellasothercontagiousdiseasesglobally.

Acknowledgements

WethankthenationalInfluenzanetteamsfromtheNetherlands and Belgium (Grote Griepmeting), Portugal (Gripenet), Italy (Influweb),UnitedKingdom(Flusurvey),Sweden(Halsörapport), France(Grippenet),andSpain(Gripenet)forprovidingdataforthis study.ThisresearchwasfundedbytheEuropeanCommission (EC-ICT-231807).MVRacknowledgesthesupportoftheInstituteforthe PromotionofInnovationbyScienceandTechnology(IWT)in Flan-ders(strategicbasicresearchprojectSIMID).MGMGthanksICyT projects60/2010and343/2010.CTCwassupportedbya fellow-shipfromtheBrazilianResearchCouncil(CNPq)duringthisstudy. SPNwassupportedbyCAPESinthefinalstagesofthiswork. AppendixA. Supplementarydata

Supplementarydataassociatedwiththisarticlecanbefound,in theonlineversion,atdoi:10.1016/j.epidem.2015.05.001

References

Aguilera,J.F.,Paget,W.J.,Mosnier,A.,Heijnen,M.L.,Uphoff,H.,etal.,2003. Hetero-geneouscasedefinitionsusedforthesurveillanceofinfluenzainEurope.Eur.J. Epidemiol.18(8),751–754.

Allard,R.,1998.Useoftime-seriesanalysisininfectiousdiseasesurveillance.Bull. WorldHealthOrgan.76(4),327–333.

Arcavi,L.,Benowitz,N.L.,2004.Cigarettesmokingandinfection.Arch.Intern.Med. 164(20),2206–2216.

Bajardi,P.,Paolotti,D.,Vespignani,A.,Eames,K.,Funk,S.,etal.,2014.Association betweenrecruitmentmethodsandattritioninInternet-basedstudies.PLoSONE 9(12),e114925.

Belongia,E.A.,Kieke,B.A.,Donahue,J.G.,Greenlee,R.T.,Balish,A.,etal.,2009. Effec-tivenessofinactivatedinfluenzavaccinesvariedsubstantiallywithantigenic matchfromthe2004–2005seasontothe2006–2007season.J.Infect.Dis.199 (2),159–167.

Bloom,R.M.,Buckeridge,D.L.,Cheng,K.E.,2007.Findingleadingindicatorsfor dis-easeoutbreaks:filtering,cross-correlation,andcaveats.J.Am.Med.Inform. Assoc.14(1),76–85.

Bridges,C.B.,Thompson,W.W.,Meltzer,M.I.,Reeve,G.R.,Talamonti,W.J.,etal., 2000.Effectivenessandcost-benefitofinfluenzavaccinationofhealthy work-ingadults:arandomizedcontrolledtrial.J.Am.Med.Inform.Assoc.284(13), 1655–1663.

Butler,D.,2006.Diseasesurveillanceneedsarevolution.Nature440(7080),6–7.

Cantarelli,P.,Debin,M.,Turbelin,C.,Poletto,C.,Blanchon,T.,etal.,2014.The rep-resentativenessofaEuropeanmulti-centernetworkforinfluenza-like-illness participatorysurveillance.BMCPublicHealth14,984.

Cauchemez,S.,Donnelly,C.A.,Reed,C.,Ghani,A.C.,Fraser,C.,etal.,2009.Household transmissionof2009pandemicinfluenzaA(H1N1)virusintheUnitedStates. N.Engl.J.Med.361(27),2619–2627.

(9)

Chretien,J.P.,Burkom,H.S.,Sedyaningsih,E.R.,Larasati,R.P.,Lescano,A.G.,etal., 2008.Syndromicsurveillance:adaptinginnovationstodevelopingsettings.PLoS Med.5(3),e72.

Cooper,D.L.,Smith,G.E.,Regan,M.,Large,S.,Groenewegen,P.P.,2008.Trackingthe spatialdiffusionofinfluenzaandnorovirususingtelehealthdata:a spatiotem-poralanalysisofsyndromicdata.BMCMed.6,16.

Debin, M.,Colizza, V., Blanchon, T.,Hanslik, T., Turbelin,C., Falchi, A., 2014.

Effectivenessof2012–2013influenzavaccineagainstinfluenza-likeillnessin generalpopulation:estimationinaFrenchweb-basedcohort.Hum.Vaccine Immunother.10(3),536–543.

Demicheli,V.,Jefferson,T.,Al-Ansary,L.A.,Ferroni,E.,Rivetti,A.,etal.,2009.Vaccines forpreventinginfluenzainhealthyadults.CochraneDatabaseSyst.Rev.3.

Eames,K.T.,Brooks-Pollock,E.,Paolotti,D.,Perosa,M.,Gioannini,C.,Edmunds, W.J.,2012a.Rapidassessmentofinfluenzavaccineeffectiveness:analysisofan internet-basedcohort.Epidemiol.Infect.140(7),1309–1315.

Eames,K.T.D.,Tilston,N.L.,Brooks-Pollock,E.,Edmunds,W.J.,2012b.Measured dynamicsocialcontactpatternsexplainthespreadofH1N1vinfluenza.PLoS Comput.Biol.8(3),e1002425.

Friesema,I.H.M.,Koppeschaar,C.E.,Donker,G.A.,Dijkstra,F.,vanNoort,S.P.,etal., 2009.Internet-basedmonitoringofinfluenza-likeillnessinthegeneral popula-tion:experienceoffiveinfluenzaseasonsintheNetherlands.Vaccine27(45), 6353–6357.

Ginsberg,J.,Mohebbi,M.H.,Patel,R.S.,Brammer,L.,Smolinski,M.S.,etal.,2009.

Detectinginfluenzaepidemicsusingsearchenginequerydata.Nature 457 (7232),1012–1014.

Gordon,A.,Ortega,O.,Kuan,G.,Reingold,A.,Saborio,S.,etal.,2009.Prevalenceand seasonalityofinfluenza-likeillnessinchildren,Nicaragua,2005–2007.Emerg. Infect.Dis.15(3),408–414.

Gupta,V.,Earl,D.J.,Deem,M.W.,2006.Quantifyinginfluenzavaccineefficacyand antigenicdistance.Vaccine24(18),3881–3888.

Henning,K.J.,2004.Whatissyndromicsurveillance?MMWRMorb.Mortal.Wkly. Rep.53(Suppl.),5–11.

Hyndman,R.,Athanasopoulos,G.,2014.Forecasting:PrinciplesandPractice,http:// otexts.org/fpp/(accessedApril2014).

Irwin,D.E.,Weatherby,L.B.,Huang,W.Y.,Rosenberg,D.M.,Cook,S.F.,etal.,2001.

Impactofpatientcharacteristicsontheriskofinfluenza/ILI-related complica-tions.BMCHealthServ.Res.1(1),8.

Jackson,L.A.,Jackson,M.L.,Nelson,J.C.,Neuzil,K.M.,Weiss,N.S.,2006.Evidenceof biasinestimatesofinfluenzavaccineeffectivenessinseniors.Int.J.Epidemiol. 35(2),337–344.

Jefferson,T.,DiPietrantonj,C.,Al-Ansary,L.A.,Ferroni,E.,Thorning,S.,etal.,2010.

Vaccinesforpreventinginfluenzaintheelderly.CochraneDatabaseSyst.Rev. (2),CD004876.

Jin,H.,Zhou,H.,Liu,H.,Chan,W.,Adhikary,L.,Mahmood,K.,Lee,M.S.,Kemble, G.,2005.TworesiduesinthehemagglutininofA/Fujian/411/02-likeinfluenza virusesareresponsibleforantigenicdriftfromA/Panama/2007/99.Virology336 (1),113–119.

Keramarou,M.,Cottrell,S.,Evans,M.R.,Moore,C.,Stiff,R.E.,etal.,2011.Twowaves ofpandemicinfluenzaA(H1N1)2009inWales—thepossibleimpactofmedia coverageonconsultationrates,April–December2009.EuroSurveill.16(3).

Lazarus,R.,Kleinman,K.P.,Dashevsky,I.,DeMaria,A.,Platt,R.,2001.Using auto-matedmedicalrecordsforrapididentificationofillnesssyndromes(syndromic surveillance):theexampleoflowerrespiratoryinfection.BMCPublicHealth1, 9.

Lipsitch,M.,Hayden,F.G.,Cowling,B.J.,Leung,G.M.,2009.Howtomaintain surveil-lancefornovelinfluenzaaH1N1whentherearetoomanycasestocount.Lancet 374(9696),1209–1211.

Mandl,K.D.,Overhage,J.M.,Wagner,M.M.,Lober,W.B.,Sebastiani,P.,etal.,2004.

Implementingsyndromicsurveillance:apracticalguideinformedbytheearly experience.J.Am.Med.Inform.Assoc.11(2),141–150.

Marquet,R.L.,Bartelds,A.I.M.,vanNoort,S.P.,Koppeschaar,C.E.,Paget,J.,etal.,2006.

Internet-basedmonitoringofinfluenza-likeillness(ILI)inthegeneral popula-tionoftheNetherlandsduringthe2003–2004influenzaseason.BMCPublic Health6,242.

Merk,H.,Kuhlmann-Berenzon,S.,Bexelius,C.,Sandin,S.,Litton,J.E.,etal.,2013.The validityofself-initiated,event-driveninfectiousdiseasereportingingeneral populationcohorts.PLOSONE8(4),e61644.

Monto,A.S.,2004.Occurrenceofrespiratoryvirus:time,placeandperson.Pediatr. Infect.Dis.J.23(1Suppl.),S58–S64.

Monto,A.S.,Ross,H.,1977.Acuterespiratoryillnessinthecommunity:effectof familycomposition,smoking,andchronicsymptoms.Br.J.Prev.Soc.Med.31 (2),101–108.

O’Brien,R.M.,2007.Acautionregardingrulesofthumbforvarianceinflationfactors. Qual.Quant.41(5),673–690,ISSN0033-5177.

Paolotti,D.,Carnahan,A.,Colizza,V.,Eames,K.,Edmunds,J.,etal.,2014.Web-based participatorysurveillanceofinfectiousdiseases:theInfluenzanetparticipatory surveillanceexperience.Clin.Microbiol.Infect.20(1),17–21.

Patterson-Lomba,O.,vanNoort,S.P.,Cowling,B.J.,Wallinga,J.,Gomes,M.G.M.,etal., 2014.Utilizingsyndromicsurveillancedataforestimatinglevelsofinfluenza circulation.Am.J.Epidemiol.179(11),1394–1401.

RDevelopmentCoreTeam,2014.R:ALanguageandEnvironmentforStatistical Computing.RFoundationforStatisticalComputing,Vienna,Austria.

Rehn,M.,Carnahan,A.,Merk,H.,ouml,K.,hlmann-Berenzon,S.,Galanis,I.,etal., 2014.EvaluationofanInternet-basedmonitoringsystemforinfluenza-like ill-nessinSweden.PLoSONE9(5),e96740.

Reis,B.Y.,Kohane,I.S.,Mandl,K.D.,2007.Anepidemiologicalnetworkmodelfor diseaseoutbreakdetection.PLoSMed4(6),e210.

Smolderen,K.G.E.,Vingerhoets,A.J.J.M.,Croon,M.A.,Denollet,J.,2007.Personality, psychologicalstress,andself-reportedinfluenzasymptomatology.BMCPublic Health7,339.

vanNoort,S.P.,Muehlen,M.,deAndrade,H.R.,Koppeschaar,C.,Lourenc¸o,J.M.L., etal.,2007.Gripenet:aninternet-basedsystemtomonitorinfluenza-likeillness uniformlyacrossEurope.EuroSurveill.12(7),E5–E6.

vanNoort,S.P.,Águas,R.,Ballesteros,S.,Gomes,M.G.M.,2012.Theroleofweather ontherelationbetweeninfluenzaandinfluenza-likeillness.J.Theor.Biol.298, 131–137.

vanNoort,S.P.,(PhDthesis)2014.ParticipatorySurveillanceandMathematical Mod-elsinEpidemiologicResearch:SuccessesandChallenges.UniversidadeNovade Lisboa.

Vandendijck,Y.,Faes,C.,Hens,N.,2013.Eightyearsofthegreatinfluenzasurveyto monitorinfluenza-likeillnessinFlanders.PLOSONE8(5),e64156.

Viboud,C.,Boëlle,P.Y.,Cauchemez,S.,Lavenu,A.,Valleron,A.J.,etal.,2004.Risk factorsofinfluenzatransmissioninhouseholds.Br.J.Gen.Pract.54(506), 684–689.

vandenWijngaard,C.,vanAsten,L.,vanPelt,W.,Nagelkerke,N.J.D.,Verheij,R.,etal., 2008.Validationofsyndromicsurveillanceforrespiratorypathogenactivity. Emerg.Infect.Dis.14(6),917–925.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The median time between symptom onset and seeking medical care was ten months; four months between the first general consultation motivated by the tumor and the first visit to

The following were applied to all participants before and 8 weeks after intervention: anthropometric and demographic assessment (weight, height, time since disease onset and

Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that the performance of patients after two years of the inten- sive care discharge is preserved, since they retain the

Its occurrence at 9 days after the antidepressant treatment was initiated (other authors have reported that hyponatraemia occurred after a median of 13 days of SSRI use, 5

Our study focused on a critical time period after detoxification since all patients were within 15 days and 120 days of abstinence. In this period, patients usually

season, only during certain weeks within each season the actual influenza.. A) ILI incidence in vaccinated and un- vaccinated participants. The ILI incidence by Influenzanet is

* Only time in days (18.7 days, SD = 12.8 days) reported between the diagnosis of stroke and the onset of abnormal movements in a group of 14 patients with tremor after stroke.

The case reported here, with clinical signs and symptoms detected 42 years after the trauma, had the longest time interval from injury to diagnosis ever described.. reported a