• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Causes of learning problems in primary school students

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "Causes of learning problems in primary school students"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texto

(1)

Б 0579-6431; 35 (2003) .151-165

Њ

.

(N=335). ђ

: , , ( , , ),

џ . ,

, ,

.

.

.

, . ,

,

.

. џ

, , .

К : , , ,

, џ , .

,

, .

,

- ,

( , ).

-,

, ,

, .

,

- (2002) (

) , .

: (1) ; (2)

; (3) ; (4)

; (5) . .

, ,

: , , ,

.

,

. ђ ђ ( ),

, , ,

џ , , , ,

.

, (1997)

. ,

, ,

. Ј

,

-: ,

. -

-.

(2)

-, . ,

: , ,

, .

.

(1995, 1997)

.

,

, (»

«), џ , ђ

-; .

(1997), , ,

.

: ( ,

, );

-; ; ; ;

.

(2001)

,

.

. ,

, ,

; ;

; ђ

( , –

). : (1)

ђ (» «;

» «; »

џ «; » џ «; » «; » «;

» «; » ,

«); (2) ; (3)

(4) .

,

,

.

, , 335

,

. ,

:

• .

• .

• .

• .

• .

• џ .

• .

(3)

ђ , /

. ,

џ , , ,

.

, џ ,

, ,

.

,

â , .

- (2002),

.

. ,

џ . ђ ,

,

.

.

,

, . ,

, ,

.

ђ , ( ).

.

.

,

, ( , 2002).

( , , AS, SD, .); (

); (χ2 ).

.

.

,

.

(

) . ,

.

(28.4%).

.

(22.7%), (18%) (17%).

, џ .

:

(%)

* %

. 1. 2. .

3. . 4. .

5. . .

6.

џ .

7. .

F (1-7) 1** 37.71 28.35 17.01 4.12 5.67 18.04 4.12 22.68 194

2 37.71 12.87 15.20 5.26 16.96 22.22 4.09 23.39 171 I

3 32.57 11.24 14.79 11.24 17.75 17.16 9.47 18.34 169 4 24.29 7.69 7.69 26.15 10.77 21.54 15.38 10.77 130 II 5 . 22.86 21.55 27.59 8.62 16.38 9.48 3.45 12.93 116

(4)

IV 10 7.43 18.52 14.81 11.11 14.81 11.11 29.63 27 11 2.00 22.22 11.11 22.22 44.44 9 V 12 1.43 44.44 11.11 22.22 22.22 5

* =

** , .

( , 2002)

.

, . ,

( 40%) . ђ 38.7%

, 22.5% , 19% , 17.6% , 2.1%.

(29.6%) (27.5%), 22.5% , 9.9%,

7.% .

(1997) ,

,

( ). (1997) ђ

.

( ),

( ).

. ,

. .

,

, (17%).

( 15%), ( 12%).

џ ( 10%), .

(18%) ( , 2002).

(46.7%) (35%) ; 50%

, 26.7% . –

40%. (30.1%) (25.7%) .

ђ (39.7%) (15.4% ,

13.2% , 14.7% 11.8% ).

,

. (42.9%) (35.1%)

. , .

, 30.3%

, 29.4% 23.5% . 44.5%

, 19.3% .

(2001), (

) , (

ђ – ). ,

ђ 27 ђ ,

.

(1997)

, . ,

,

.

,

-. (1997)

. ђ ,

, , .

,

(5)

, ,

. ,

, .

- (2001)

,

.

( ) ( )

. ,

.

( )

( ). џ (

џ , ђ ). 10%

.

( 26.6%)

. (44.9%,

36%). ђ 21.3% , 15.7%

. (51.7%)

, 29.2%. 29.2% ,

18% , 15.7% . , (23.6%)

(21.3%) , 18% ,

– 11.2%.

(1997) , ,

џ .

- (2001)

, ,

– ,

.

(1997).

.

,

( ). 16% ,

13%. ђ

( ).

.

ђ (42.7%) (30.9%) ,

(45.5%) (30%) .

. ђ 44.6% , 30.1%

; (36.1%)

(27.7%) .

, (2001)

ђ ,

60%, .

, (1997),

, .

(1997)

, ,

, ,

.

, ,

.

.

(16% ) (13%). ,

(6)

.

(17%) (13%).

, (43.7%)

, .

(16.4%). (32.7%)

, (29.1%) . 29.1%

, 23.6% , 20% .

, (1997) џ

. ђ ,

,

.

, - (2001),

,

.

,

(1997), .

. , , :

, џ .

(39.7%

, 26% 23.3% ). ђ

– 82.2%.

17% (35.1% 31.6% ). ђ

(40.4%).

(1997)

, џ ,

.

- (2001),

,

.

, (1997),

, .

( 80%) .

( 8%) ,

. .

(

), .

ђ .

( ), ,

, џ .

,

. (9.3%) , ђ

(33.3%) (30%) .

( 23.3% , 20%

-), .

(2001)

. ,

,

(7)

(1997)

, , ( )

.

40% , ,

20%. , ;

10.4% .

( , 1997). - (2001)

,

. (1997)

,

. (1997)

, ( ,

).

, .

( ), (

), .

(34.6%

, 24.4% , 21.8% ).

(73.1%). 18.5% .

ђ 37.1% 33.9% .

, .

, (1997),

.

, - (2001) ,

,

. , (1997)

(80%) , (60%)

.

( 2%)

, .

,

.

( 30.8%

), ђ 80%

. (5.4%) .

17.3% (

, ). 80%

. ( 10%)

.

(1997),

,

. ,

- (2001) 30%

. , (1997), (

70%) . ,

( ),

.

.

, ,

(8)

. ( )

,

.

ђ

, ,

.

џ

, .

. ђ , ђ

( ). ,

,

. ђ ,

; , ,

; , .

, ,

( ). , ,

ђ .

, ,

. .

. ,

, .

, , , .

( , 1997; , 2001).

,

. , ;

. , ђ ,

.

(1995, 1997) ,

. ,

,

.

(2001), .

, , ,

. ђ ђ :

, .

(

), ( )

.

-(2001, 2002).

, ,

џ .

, , ,

ђ ,

(9)

,

, .

.

,

, . ,

, ,

, , –

.

Ќ

, . (1995): ,

, 4, 339–349.

, . (1997): ,

(69–73), ђ . :

.

, . (2001): , Е

(9–10), VII , 14. 15. 2001. : ,

.

- , . . (2002): ,

(9–27). : .

, . (2000): ,

, 5, 692–706.

, . (2002): ,

, 5, 383–399.

, . (1997): . :

.

, . . - (2001):

, , . 33 (389–407). :

.

, . (1997): :

Referências

Documentos relacionados

As teachers we know that for some students learning a foreign language can be stimulating and they embrace it with great interest, but for others it can be challenging. Therefore,

The purpose of this research was to determine if knowing the students’ preferred learning style helped me improve my teaching and subsequently helped learners learn a

In this perspective, environmental education can enhance an education aimed at the construction of transdisciplinary knowledge, by distinguishing the observers in edu- cation,

Currently, the hospital pharmaceutical services represent an important structure of the global health care, with particular competences, also designated “activities of

1 Gold Rostislav Rumenov Bulgaria 2 Gold Ionescu Bogdan-Gabriel Romania 3 Gold Airinei Adrian Romania 4 Silver Mikloˇs Homolja Serbia 5 Silver Mantoulidis

Four research questions were formed to see whether there were signif- icant differences among the levels of independent variables (age; gender; increased experience with online

As it is shown in Table 7, students with worse success in school live in families with under aver- age socio-economic status, while students with better success live in families

Therefore, our study aimed to explore the prevalence of various learning styles according to the VARK framework among medical students, the correlations between academic