Influence of problem-based teaching and learning of grammar on pupils’ attainment in primary school

(1)

371.3::811.163.41'36; 371.314.6; DOI: 10.2298/ZIPI1002247J 159.953.5.072-057.874

И Ј Е Е Е И Е

И Ћ Е И Ј И*

Ј **

, ,

А . ,

204

. ђ

.

, ,

,

.

-ђ ђ

ђ

.

, ђ

.

К : ,

-, .

-.

-,

.

-,

-ђ (Milatović, 1999),

(Niko-lić, 1992).

* . :

„ ”, 2009.

.

(2)

-.

-,

(Ilić, 1998).

-, o

, ,

, (Marinković, 2000).

-ђ ,

-. , (Petrovački,

2000) ,

.

( , , 2004)

-. -

-.

. ,

,

-.

,

, ђ ,

.

-, ,

(Short, Harste &

Burke, 1996). ,

. ,

-. Ј

-.

,

, , , ,

(3)

-ђ

.

(Skehan, 2003).

-.

(Rope, 1990).

(Tagliante, 2001).

,

„ ”

- .

(Bourke, 2010),

-,

. Ј

(Haby, 1975).

-,

-- . ђ , ђ

. ,

,

-,

(Petrovački, 2000; Jocić, 2007). ђ

--

,

.

(4)

-,

-.

.

1_.

ђ

(Anderson, 1982; Stojaković, 2006).

(Božin i Milatović, 2009).

(Vilotijević, 1999; Nikolić, 1992; Milatović,

1999),

.

-,

,

.

,

-, ђ

-.

-ђ .

, ,

,

-- . ,

.

. :

ђ

-. :



;



-;

1 :

(5)



-ђ

-;



.

2007/2008. ,

.

,

.

-,

26

-, 11 15 .

: ,

,

-,

.

(Branković, 1999),

– , .

.

,

.

,

-.

(6)

-.

.

(Ševkušić, 2006) (Roeders,

2003)

,

-.

,

.

,

. ,

, ,

.

ђ .

,

, ,

.

-.

-,

.

: „ “ „ ”.

-, 204 , 55 47

.

-ђ

-, ђ

.

(7)

: „

-” „ ”.

-,

(Stevanović, 1982).

-, - (Langer, 1981) ђ

,

.

,

-.

(Pijaže, 1977).

.

-t

.

-ђ ,

1, ,

-.

,

-.

. ,

-,

,

-, ,

(8)

1:

ј е у N M SD T df p

102 24,0735 3,4378

102 21,8186 4,3297 4,119 202 0,0001

102 23,2059 3,9202

102 20,6471 4,2697 4,458 202 0,0001

-,

-. ,

,

. , ,

.

,

-,

-.

.

,

.

-,

-, ,

.

-.

(9)

-,

(Gajić, 2004).

: 6 :

.

-: ;

; ;

-. 10 :

-.

: „ ”; „

”; „ ”.

-: К , ;

-;К , ; ,

;К , .

, ђ ,

-ђ ђ ,

.

2:

у N M SD t df P

55 24,9364 3,1682

55 23,4636 3,6437 2,262 108 0,026

55 24,0364 3,4945

55 21,5000 3,7896 3,649 108 0,001

3:

у N M SD t df p

47 23,0638 3,4979

47 19,8936 4,3074 3,917 92 0,001

47 22,2340 4,1974

47 19,6489 4,6132 2,842 92 0,006

.

,

, .

ђ ,

(10)

-ђ ђ ( ) ( )

ђ

.

,

-.

.

( 4).

, ,

,

3 4.

2 5

.

4:

ј е це г N M SD

2 24 17,4583 3,0429

3 42 20,1310 3,5010

4 60 23,7167 2,6287

5 78 25,5577 2,7914

204 22,9461 4,0601

2 24 17,1250 3,6897

3 42 18,6548 3,5843

4 60 22,1000 3,0264

5 78 25,0321 2,7685

204 21,9265 4,2850

5

.

-ђ

-, , 2,

. 3 4

,

(11)

,

.

,

.

-ђ

.

,

.

-, ,

-. ,

-,

-. ђ

,

.

11. 2009. ђ

. Њ

-, ,

ђ .

,

-,

ђ .

( 5).

ђ .

5:

N M SD T Df p

98 21,6429 4,2898

106 24,1509 3,4380 4,624 202 0,000

98 20,1786 4,5737

(12)

9 12

,

.

,

ђ ,

-.

(Žlebnik, 1972). ђ

-, ђ

-, , ,

, .

,

-.

.

,

(Marjanović, 1990),

-, , .

ђ

, , ,

(Stevanović, 1967).

-.

.

ђ

.

ђ

-,

(13)

ђ

.

,

. ,

.

-,

-, .

3 4,

ђ

,

.

,

.

-, ђ

.

ђ ,

.

, ,

,

.

К

Anderson, J. (1982): Acquisition of cognitive skill, Psychological Review, Vol. 89, No. 4, 369-405.

Bourke,K.(2010):Teachinggrammar toyoung learners. RetrievedJune20, 2010 from the World Wide Web

http://www.oup.com/elt/catalogue/guidance_articles/14867483?cc=gb

(14)

Branković, D. (1999): Interaktivno učenje u problemskoj nastavi; u N. Suzić, P. Stojaković, M. Ilić, D. Branković, S. Milijević, D. Krneta, S. Stanojlović, P. Đaković, M. Banjac i Ž. Grbić (prir.): Interaktivno učenje (109-133).Banjaluka: Ministarstvo prosvjete Re-publike Srpske.

Gajić, . (2004): Problemska nastava književnosti. Novi Sad: Zmaj.

Haby, R. (1975): Enseignement de lorthogrqphe dqns les coles et les colleges. Paris: Lq re-forme Haby de 1975.

Ilić, P. (1998): Srpski jezik i književnost u nastavnoj teoriji i praksi – metodika nastave. Novi Sad: Zmaj.

Jocić, Z. (2007): Jezičko stvaralaštvo učenika u nastavi gramatike. Beograd: Učiteljski fakul-tet.

Langer, Dž. (1981): Teorije psihičkog razvoja. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sred-stva.

, . ., . . . . (2004):

. :

-.

Marinković, S. (2000): Metodika kreativne nastave srpskog jezika i književnosti. Beograd: Kreativni centar.

Marjanović, A. (1990): Igre govorom i jezikom; u A. Marjanović, R. Ivanović, S. Janković i S. Gašić-Pavišić (prir.): Dečje jezičke igre (29-54).Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nas-tavna sredstva i Sarajevo: Svetlost.

Milatović, V. (1999): Metodička pitanja nastave gramatike, Metodička praksa,God. 3, Br. 1-2 (11-2-1-24). Beograd: Školska knjiga.

Nikolić, M. (1992): Metodika nastave srpskog jezika i književnosti. Beograd: Zavod za udž-benike i nastavna sredstva.

Petrovački, Lj. (2000): Sintaksa u nastavi srpskog jezika i književnosti. Novi Sad: Zmaj. Pijaže, Ž. (1977): Psihologija inteligencije. Beograd: Nolit.

Roeders, P. (2003): Interaktivna nastava. Beograd: Institut za pedagogiju i andragogiju Filo-zofskog fakulteta.

Rope, F. (1990): Enseigner le français. didactique de la langue maternelle. Paris: Editions Universitaires.

Short, K.G., J. Harste &_{C. Burke (1996):}_{Creating classrooms for authors and inquirers}₍₂nd

edition). Portsmouth: Heinemann.

Skehan, P. (2003): A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Spiro, R.J., P.J. Feltovich, M.J. Jacobson &_{R.L. Coulson (1991):}_{Cognitive flexibility,} con-structivism and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisi-tion in ill-structured domains. Chicago, Il: University of Illinois.

Stevanović, B. (1967): Pedagoška psihologija. Beograd: Zavod za izdavanje udžbenika Soci-jalističke Republike Srbije.

Stevanović, M. (1982): Metodički priručnik za nastavu srpskohrvatskog jezika i književnosti u osnovnoj školi. Gornji Milanovac: Dečje novine.

Stojaković, P. (2006): Višestruke sposobnosti za učenje. Banjaluka: Filozofski fakultet. Ševkušić, S. (2006): Kooperativno učenje i kvalitet znanja; u S. Krnjajić (prir.): Pretpostavke

uspešne nastave (179-202). Beograd: Institut za pedagoška istraživanja. Tagliante, C. (2001): La classe de langue. Paris: CLE International.

Vilotijević, M. (1999): Didaktika 1 – predmet didaktike. Beograd: Naučna knjiga i Učiteljski fakultet.

Žlebnik, L. (1972): Psihologija deteta i mladih 2. Beograd: Delta-pres.

(15)

Zorica Jocić

INFLUENCE OF PROBLEM-BASED TEACHING AND LEARNING OF GRAMMAR ON PUPILS’ ATTAINMENT IN PRIMARY SCHOOL

Abstract

With the purpose of getting an insight into the effects of problem-based teaching and learning, an experiment was carried out by using the method of parallel groups on the sample of 204 pupils in the third and sixth grade of primary school. The results of final knowledge assessment showed that problem-based teaching and learning of grammar had positive influence on pupils' attainment comparing to the usual way of learning grammar. A significant improvement has been achieved in the field of reproductive and productive grammar knowledge on the whole sample of pupils as well as on the subsamples of pupils in the third and sixth grade. Because of the limited time left for this experimental programme, the reproductive knowledge of pupils was bigger than the productive knowledge. It has been noticed that regarding the successfulness of solving the grammatical problems, there was no difference between the pupils of younger and older primary school age, in the situation when these problems were decided on according to their age and intellectual abilities. All pupils had made an improvement, but they remained within the range of their marks in Serbian language. In addition to this, better progress was made by the pupils with better marks in Serbian language. Girls were more successful than boys, but the difference between boys and girls was smaller regarding the reproductive knowledge than the productive knowledge.

Key words: problem-based teaching and learning of grammar, pupils attainment at younger and older primary school age, the success of girls and boys.

, ,

(

204

).

-,

.

,

-. ,

,

(16)

-. ,

. , ,

,

. , ,

,

.

К : ,

, ,