h tt p : / / w w w . b j m i c r o b i o l . c o m . b r /
Medical
Microbiology
Diarrheagenic
Escherichia
coli
Tânia
A.T.
Gomes
a,∗,
Waldir
P.
Elias
b,
Isabel
C.A.
Scaletsky
a,
Beatriz
E.C.
Guth
a,
Juliana
F.
Rodrigues
c,
Roxane
M.F.
Piazza
b,
Luís
C.S.
Ferreira
c,
Marina
B.
Martinez
daUniversidadeFederaldeSãoPaulo,EscolaPaulistadeMedicina,DepartamentodeMicrobiologia,ImunologiaeParasitologia,SãoPaulo,
SP,Brazil
bInstitutoButantan,LaboratóriodeBacterologia,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil
cUniversidadedeSãoPaulo,InstitutodeCiênciasBiomédicas,DepartamentodeMicrobiologia,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil
dUniversidadedeSãoPaulo,FaculdadedeCiênciasFarmacêuticas,DepartamentodeAnálisesClínicaseToxicológicas,SãoPaulo,SP,
Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:Received8October2016 Accepted27October2016 Availableonline5November2016
Keywords: Escherichiacoli Diarrhea Pathogenicmechanisms Virulencefactor Epidemiology
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
MostEscherichiacolistrainsliveharmlesslyintheintestinesandrarelycause diseasein healthyindividuals.Nonetheless,anumberofpathogenicstrainscancausediarrheaor extraintestinaldiseasesbothinhealthyandimmunocompromisedindividuals.Diarrheal illnessesareaseverepublichealthproblemandamajorcauseofmorbidityand mortal-ity ininfantsandyoungchildren,especially indevelopingcountries.E.colistrainsthat causediarrheahaveevolvedbyacquiring,throughhorizontalgenetransfer,aparticularset ofcharacteristicsthathavesuccessfullypersistedinthehost.Accordingtothegroupof virulencedeterminantsacquired,specificcombinationswereformeddeterminingthe cur-rentlyknownE.colipathotypes,whicharecollectivelyknownasdiarrheagenicE.coli.Inthis review,wehavegatheredinformationoncurrentdefinitions,serotypes,lineages,virulence mechanisms,epidemiology,anddiagnosisofthemajordiarrheagenicE.colipathotypes.
©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeMicrobiologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisis anopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
The genus Escherichia, which was named after the Ger-manpediatricianTheodor Escherich,consistsoffacultative anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli that belong to the family Enterobacteriaceae.1ThegenustypespeciesEscherichiacoliis
widelydistributed,whereitisthemajorfacultativeanaerobe inhabitingthelargeintestineofhumansandwarm-blooded animals.2 Although most E. coli strains live harmlessly in
thecolonand seldomcausedisease inhealthy individuals,
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:tatg.amaral@unifesp.br(T.A.Gomes).
a number of pathogenic strains can cause intestinal and extraintestinaldiseasesbothinhealthyand immunocompro-misedindividuals.3
Diarrhealillnessesareaseverepublichealthproblemand amajorcauseofmorbidityandmortalityininfantsandyoung children.4Low-andmiddle-incomecountriesinAfrica,Asia
andLatinAmericaarethemostaffectedregionswithdiarrheal diseasesoccurringmoreoftenwithlethaloutcomesmainly
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2016.10.015
1517-8382/©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeMicrobiologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC BY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
due to poor living conditions (inadequate water supplies, poorenvironmentalhygieneandsanitation,andinsufficient education).5
E.colistrainsinvolvedindiarrhealdiseasesareoneofthe mostimportantofthevariousetiologicalagentsofdiarrhea, wherestrainshaveevolvedbytheacquisition,through hori-zontalgenetransfer,ofaparticularsetofcharacteristicsthat havesuccessfullypersistedinthehost.3,5,6Accordingtothe
groupofvirulencedeterminantsacquired,specific combina-tions were formeddeterminingthe currentlyknown E. coli
pathotypes, which are collectively known asdiarrheagenic
E.coli(DEC).6TheDECpathotypesdifferregardingtheir
prefer-entialhostcolonizationsites,virulencemechanisms,andthe ensuingclinicalsymptomsandconsequences,andare clas-sifiedasenteropathogenic E.coli(EPEC),enterohemorrhagic (Shigatoxin-producing)E.coli(EHEC/STEC),enteroaggregative
E.coli(EAEC),enterotoxigenicE.coli(ETEC),andenteroinvasive
E.coli(EIEC).
Each of these pathotypes represents a group of clones thatsharespecificvirulencefactors.Nevertheless,itshould bepointedout thattheplasticityoftheE. coligenome has hindered the identification of certain E. coli isolates as a pathotype,becausesomeisolatescombinethemainvirulence characteristicsofdifferentpathotypesandare thus consid-eredpotentiallymorevirulenthybridpathogenicstrains.5
Anotherlesswell-definedpathotypehasbeendescribed, thatis,thediffusely-adherentE.coli(DAEC)pathotype,which comprisesstrainsthatadheretoepithelialcellsinadiffused distribution.6 Despitetheirclassificationasagroupdistinct
fromtheotherpathotypes,thedesignationofDAECasa differ-entDECpathotyperequiresfurtherepidemiologicalstudies, whichhavebeenhamperedbythedifficultiesinits identifi-cationandclassification.5Furthermore,certainE.colistrains
thathavebeenclassifiedastheadherentinvasiveE.coli(AIEC) pathotype,compriseoneofthepotentialagentsforCrohn’s disease(CD).CDisaninflammatoryboweldisease(IBD),which isthoughttobecausedbyacombinationoffactors(genetics, theintestinalmicrobiota,environmentalfactors,andenteric pathogens).7,8
DiarrhealepisodesduetoDECinfectionsareanimportant publichealth issueamong childrenand adultsin develop-ingcountries,becauseoftheirassociationwithmorbidityand mortalityofchildrenlessthanfiveyearsofage.Itwasouraim withthisreviewtogatherinformationoncurrentdefinitions, serotypes,lineages,virulencemechanisms,epidemiology,and diagnosisofthemajorDECpathotypeswithemphasisonthe studiesconductedinBrazil.
Typical
and
atypical
enteropathogenic
E.
coli
Theterm enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) was first used in 1995byNeteretal.,9todescribeanumberofE.colistrains
epidemiologicallyrelatedtoaseriesofoutbreaksofinfantile diarrheainthe1940sand1950s.10,11 Originallyidentifiedby
serotype,EPECarenowdefinedasthoseE.colistrainshaving theabilitytocausediarrhea,toproduceahistopathologyon theintestinalepitheliumknownastheattachingand effac-ing(AE)lesion,andtheinabilitytoproduceShigatoxinsand heat-labile(LT)orheat-stable(ST)enterotoxins.6
Improvementsintechniquesallowingabetter understand-ing ofthe genomeand virulencemechanisms amongEPEC strainsovertheyearshaveledtothesub-classificationofEPEC intotypicalEPEC(tEPEC)andatypicalEPEC(aEPEC).3,12
Typi-calEPECstrainscausinghumaninfectiousdiarrheapossess alargevirulenceplasmidknownastheEPECadherence fac-tor(EAF)plasmid(pEAF),whichencodesthetypeIVfimbriae called the bundle-formingpilus (BFP), while aEPEC donot possessthisplasmid.6,12
ThemajorityoftEPECstrainsfallintowell-recognizedO serotypes.ClassicalEPECOserogroupsincludeO55,O86,O111, O114,O119,O127, andO142.ThemostcommonHantigens associatedwithEPECaretheH6andH2antigens.12–15Aless
common EPEC typeisH34, and anumber oftEPEC strains areclassifiedasnon-motile(H-)inconventionaltests.Typical EPECstrainsbelongingtonon-classicalserotypeshavealso beenreported.12,16
Based on multilocus enzyme electrophoresis analysis (MLEE) of allelic differences between housekeeping genes, tEPEC strains havebeen subtypedinto twomajorlineages, previouslydesignatedEPEC1andEPEC2.13,14 EPEC1includes
widespreadserotypessuchasO55:H6andO119:H6,whereas EPEC2 consists of serotypes with more limited occurrence such as O111:H2 and O114:H2. Based on a whole-genome phylogeny and analysis oftypeIII secretion system (T3SS) effectors, tEPEC strains havebeen demonstrated to cluster inthreemainlineages,designatedEPEC1,EPEC2,andEPEC4, whichprobablyacquiredthelocusofenterocyteeffacement (LEE)regionandpEAFindependently.17
In turn, aEPEC belong to a large diversity of classical and non-classical serotypes.12,16,18 Over 20% of strains of
non-classicalEPECserotypesareOnon-typeableandthe O-typeablestrainsbelongtomorethan4200differentserotypes, withmanynon-motileandHnon-typeablestrains.12,18
Inter-estingly,ithasbeenfoundthat35%oftheaEPECstrainsalso belong tothe tEPEC lineages.17 Thus, it hasbeen
hypothe-sizedthatatleastsomeaEPECmayhaveoriginatedfromtEPEC strainsthatlostpEAFinthehostorintheenvironment.17,19,20
Virulencefactors,mechanismsandpathogenesis
TypicalEPECstrainsadheretoHeLa,HEp-2,andothercelllines andtoorganculturesinvitroinadistinctivepatternof three-dimensional microcolonies,aso-calledlocalized adherence (LA)pattern.6,21 Asimilaradherencepattern hasbeen seen
intissuebiopsiesofEPEC-infectedhumans.22
The LA phenotype is mediated by the BFP,23 which
alsocontributestoantigenicity,autoaggregation,andbiofilm formation.23–27Anoperonof14genescontainedonthepEAF
isnecessaryforBFPexpression,withbfpAencodingthemajor structural subunit (bundlin)28 and being highly conserved
amongEPEC1andEPEC2strains.
The self-transmissible pEAF pMAR2 is found among strainsoftheEPEC1lineageandcontainsanintacttransfer region,unlikepB171,whichismorecommonamongEPEC2 strains.29,30Besidesthebfpgenecluster,encodingBFP,23the
pEAFcarriestheperlocus,encodingthetranscriptional activa-torcalledplasmid-encodedregulator(Per).29BetweenpMAR2
andpB171,thebfpandperlocishare99%sequencesimilarity,30
virulence in human volunteers.24 Recent comparative
genomics ofthe EAF plasmids from diverse EPEC phyloge-nomic lineages demonstrated significant plasmid diversity evenamongisolateswithinthesamephylogenomiclineage.31
TypicalEPEChavetheabilitytoformtight,spherical, bac-terialautoaggregateswhengrowninliquidculture.32LikeLA,
autoaggregationrequiresBFP.TypicalEPECalsoformbiofilms onabioticsurfacesunderstaticconditions,orinaflowthrough continuous culture system, and a model of EPEC biofilm formation has been proposed.26 Mutagenesis analysis has
identified adhesivestructures suchas the common type 1 pilus(T1P),antigen43,BFPandtheEspAfilament(seebelow) asparticipantsinbacterialaggregationduringbiofilm forma-tiononabioticsurfaces.26
AhallmarkphenotypeofbothtEPECandaEPECisthe abil-itytoproduceAElesions.33Thisphenotypeischaracterized
byeffacementofintestinalepithelial-cellmicrovilliand inti-mateadherencebetweenthebacteriumandtheepithelialcell membrane.Directlybeneaththeadherentbacterium,marked cytoskeletalchangesareseenintheepithelialcellmembrane, particularlytheformationofanactin-richcup-likepedestalat thesiteofbacterialcontact.AElesionsareobservedinmodel EPECinfectionswithculturedcellsandmucosalexplants,as wellasinintestinal biopsiesfrom EPEC-infectedinfantsor animals.6
AE lesions are encoded by LEE, which is a ∼35-kb pathogenicityisland(PAI)34 thatisorganizedintofive
oper-ons (LEE1 to LEE5).35–37 The LEE1, LEE2, and LEE3 operons
encodecomponentsofaT3SS,andthe globalregulatorLer (LEE-encoded regulator).38 LEE4 encodes the T3SS-secreted
proteinsEspA,EspB,andEspD(EPEC-secretedprotein),which arecomponentsofthetranslocationapparatusbywhichother effectorproteinsaretranslocatedintothecell.LEE5encodes theadhesinintiminanditstranslocatedreceptor,Tir.39
Intiminisa94-kDaproteinencodedbytheeaegeneand requiredforintimateadherenceofEPECtohostcellsatthe sites of AE lesions.6 The N-terminus of intimin is highly
conserved,whereastheC-terminusishighlyvariable.40
Dif-ferencesinthe C-terminusofintiminhavebeenusedas a basisforclassificationintoseveral distinctsubtypes, repre-sentedbytheGreekletters␣(alpha)through(zeta)41,42;the␣
subtypeisexpressedbyEPEC1strainswhilesubtypeis asso-ciatedwithhumanEPEC2strains.TheN-terminusofintimin anchorsthe proteininthe EPECouter membrane,whereas the C-terminus extends from the EPEC surface and binds tothe Tir.Intimin–Tir interaction leadsto intimate adher-enceandpedestalformationbeneathadherentbacteria,39and
inhibitsNF-Bactivity throughtumornecrosisfactoralpha (TNF-␣) receptor-associatedfactors.43InadditiontoTir,the
EPECgenomecontainssixotherLEE-encodedeffectorproteins thataretranslocatedintothecell(Map,EspF,EspG,EspZ,EspH, andEspB),whichinterferewithdifferentaspectsofthecell’s physiology.13,36,37,44
In addition to the LEE effectors, various non-LEE (Nle)-encoded effector genes (cif, espI/nleA, nleB, nleC, nleD,nleE, nleH)36,44havebeendescribed,whicharelocatedoutsidethe
EPEC LEE region, in at least six chromosomal PAIs, or in prophageelements.45,46 TheNleproteinshavebeenshown
todisrupt thecytoskeleton and tightjunctions ofthe host cell, and to modulate or prevent the host inflammatory
response.45–47 Althoughtheyare notrequiredforAElesion
formation,itisunderstoodthattheycontributetoincreased bacterialvirulence.44
IntracellulartEPEChavebeenobservedbothintissue cul-tureand insmall intestinalbiopsiesfrom anEPEC-infected infant.6TwostudieshavereportedthatO111:NMstrains
con-tainplasmidsequencesthatconferinvasivenessuponE.coli
K12strainscontainingtheclonedfragments.48,49Sequences
homologoustotheseclonedgenesarepresentinonlya minor-ityoftEPECstrains(Scaletskyetal.,unpublisheddata).
Typical EPEC strains encode a large surface protein, lymphocyteinhibitoryfactor(LifA),whichinhibitsthe expres-sion of multiple lymphokines and inhibits lymphocyte proliferation.50 Two related genes efa1 and toxB have been
implicated inadhesionto epithelial cells.51,52 There is
evi-denceindicatingthatEfa1/LifAcontributestoepithelialcell adherenceinvitro53andisrequiredforintestinalcolonization
ofmicebytherelatedAEpathogenCitrobacterrodentium.54
SometEPECstrainspossessotherfimbriaeorpiliin addi-tion toBFP.Type1fimbriaeofEPEChavebeenfoundtobe antigenicinvolunteerstudies;however,theydonothavearole inadherencetoepithelialcellsinvitro.6Inaddition,someEPEC
strainshaveconservedfimbrialgenesencodinghomologsof longpolarfimbriae(LPF),55 butanumberofpolymorphisms
within the lpfA genes have been identified.56 Initial
stud-ies haveindicatedthat LPFisapparently notnecessaryfor adherenceandAElesioninhumanbiopsies.55TheE.coli
com-monpilus(ECP)hasalsobeenshowntoactasanaccessory adherence factor inEPEC, playinga role duringcell adher-enceand/orinbacterium-bacteriuminteractions.57However,
the significanceofECPto EPECpathogenesishasnot been determined.Interestingly,ithasbeenshownthatsometEPEC strainsmayproduceahybridadherencephenotypeinHeLa cells,i.e.,LAandaggregative(AA)-likepattern concurrently (LA+/AA-like+).58Recently,itwasshownthatatleastsomeof
theseLA/AA-like+strainsbearlargeplasmids,distinctfrom the pEAF, that encode a so far unknown adhesin.59 Ithas
been proposedthatthe abilityofsuchstrainsinproducing AElesionsandanAA-associatedbiofilmconcomitantlycould worsenthepatient’sclinicalcondition,leadingtopersistent diarrhea.59
FlagellamayalsobeinvolvedintEPECadherenceto epithe-lialcells,60sincecertainEPECmutantsaremarkedlyimpaired
intheirabilitytoadhereandtoformmicrocolonies. Further-more,inonestudy,purifiedEPECflagellaandanti-flagellum antibodieswere botheffectiveinblockingtheadherenceof severalEPECserotypes.60However,anotherstudycouldnot
confirmtheroleofflagellainEPECadherence.61
SometEPECstrainsharbortheastAgene,whichencodes the enteroaggregative E. coli heat-stable enterotoxin 1 (EAST1).62,63Arecentstudyreportedthat11of70(16%)tEPEC
strains testedharbored anintact astAgene.64 TypicalEPEC
strains of serotype O86:H34 produce cytolethal-distending toxin (CDT).65ThesignificanceofEAST1and CDTtoxinsin
EPECpathogenesisremainsunknown.
Autotransporter (AT) proteins, which have been associ-atedwithbacterialadherence,aggregation,biofilmformation, invasion,andtoxicity66inGram-negativebacteria,havealso
beendescribedamongEPECstrains.67Onesuchprotein,EspC,
injectedbytheT3SSinepithelialcells,hasanIgA protease-like activity and, once in the host cytoplasm, has various cytopathiceffects,includingcytoskeletaldamage,68enhanced
lysozymeresistance,70hemoglobindegradation,69hydrolysis
ofpepsin,factorV,andspectrin,70andfodrinandfocal
adhe-sion protein degradation.71 In addition, oligomerization of
EspCgivesrisetorope-likestructuresthatserveasa substra-tumforadherenceandbiofilmformationaswellasprotecting bacteriafromantimicrobialcompounds.72
A three-stage model of tEPEC adhesion and pathogen-esis, consisting of LA, signal transduction, and intimate attachmentwithpedestalformation,wasproposed.73 Simul-taneously with intimate attachment, a series of bacterial effectorproteinsareinjectedintohostcells,wherethey sub-vertactinpolymerizationandotherhostcellprocesses.37,44
Inthe earlieststageand undercorrectenvironmental con-ditions,tEPECexpressBFP,intimin,andtheT3SS/translocon apparatus.Next, EPECadheretothe surface ofthe intesti-nal epithelium via BFP and EspA filaments, and the T3SS injectsthe bacterialtranslocated intiminreceptor(Tir)and effectorproteins(EspB,EspD,EspF,EspG,and Map)directly into the host cell.37 The effectors activate cell-signaling
pathways, causing alterations in the host cell cytoskele-ton and resulting in the depolymerization of actin and the lossofmicrovilli. Finally, bacteriaintimately adhereto hostcell byintimin–Tir interactions,causinga cytoskeletal rearrangementthatresultsinpedestal-likestructures.Tir pro-motes cytoskeletalreorganization through interaction with neuralWASP(Wiskott-Aldrich syndromeprotein) (N-WASP) and subsequent activation of the Arp2/3 complex,45
lead-ing tothe effacement ofthe microvilliand the production ofpedestals.44,74 Thetranslocatedeffectorsdisrupthostcell
processes, resulting in loss of tight-junction integrity and mitochondrialfunction,leadingtobothelectrolytelossand eventualcelldeath.45
For actin dynamics subversion, tEPEC usually recruits Nck to the adhesion site in a Tir phosphorylated Y474-dependentmechanism.Inturn,TirEHEC (enterohemorrhagic
E.coli[EHEC]O157:H7)isdevoidofanY474equivalentand employs EspFU/TccP (Tir-cytoskeleton coupling protein), a
T3SS-translocatedeffectorproteinthatbindsN-WASP,leading toNck-independentactinpolymerization.45
aEPECare devoidofpEAF and donotproduceBFP. Itis importanttopointoutthatEPECstrainsofserotypesO128:H2 andO119:H2containapEAFwithdefectivebfpoperons,which containpart ofthe bfpA gene but havethe rest ofthe bfp
geneclusterdeleted.Thus,theyareclassifiedasaEPEC.12,75
MostaEPECproduceadherencepatterns categorizedas LA-like,withloosenedmicrocoloniescomparedtothoseofthe tEPEC LA pattern.12,76,77 In addition, some isolates express
the aggregative(AA) ordiffuse(DA) patterns ofadherence, whicharecharacteristicsoftheEAECandDAECpathotypes, respectively,20,78oradhereinundefinedpatternsorare
non-adherent.20,78–80 Remarkably, the epithelial cell adherence
phenotype displayedby aEPECis determined in prolonged assays(6h)ofbacteria-cell interaction.12,76,77 Inaddition, it
hasbeensuggestedthatlackofthepEAF-encoded Per pro-teinsintheregulatorycascadeoftheaEPECvirulencegenes maypromotedelayedAElesionformation,probablymakingit difficultforsuchstrainstocausedisease.81
TheprevalenceofintiminsubtypesamongaEPECstrains hasbeenreviewed.18,67Intiminsclassifiedasbeta1,epsilon1
andthetaappearasthemostfrequentamongaEPEC.78,82–85In
addition, someaEPECstrainsbearadhesive-encodinggenes thathavebeenoriginallydescribedinotherDECpathotypes and/or inextraintestinal pathogenic E. coli.79,80,82,86–88 This
observation suggests that aEPEC could employ additional adherence mechanisms besidesthe Tir-intimininteraction. The only adhesin first characterized in an aEPEC strain (serotypeO26:H11)isthelocusofdiffuseadherence(LDA),which is an afimbrialadhesin that confers the diffusepattern of adherenceonHEp-2cells,whenclonedinE.coliK-12strains.89 TheT3SS-transloconhasbeenalsoshowntocontributetothe adherenceefficacyofanaEPECstraininvitro.90Theprevalence
ofthesedifferentadhesinsamongaEPEChasbeenrecently reviewed.18,67,91
Moreover, it has been recentlyshown that the flagellar capproteinFliDofanaEPECstrain(serotypeO51:H40)binds tounknownreceptorsonintestinalCaco-2cellmicrovilli.92
Interestingly, ananti-FliD serum and purified FliD reduced adherenceoftheaEPECaswellasthatoftEPEC,EHECandETEC prototypestrainstothesamecellline.92Furthermore,ithas
beensuggestedthatadherenceofaEPECofserotypeO26:H11 maybemediatedbybindingoftheflagellinproteinFliC(the subunitoftheflagellashaft)tocellularfibronectin.93However,
theroleoftheflagellainaEPECinvivocolonizationhasyetto beinvestigated.
AtypicalEPECstrainshavealsobeenshowntoadhereto abioticsurfaces(polystyreneandglass).94,95Thenon-fimbrial
adhesincurliandtheT1Phavebeenshowntomediatebinding tothesesurfacesinsomeaEPECatdifferenttemperatures.90,96
The LEEregion ofsomeaEPEC strainsdisplay agenetic organization similar to that found in the tEPEC prototype E2348/69strain.97AlthoughtheT3SS-encodinggenesare
con-siderablyconserved,97,98theeffectorprotein-encodinggenes
displayimportantdifferences,andremarkabledifferencescan bedetectedatthe5and3flankingregionsofaEPEC, suggest-ingtheoccurrenceofdifferentevolutionaryevents.99Atypical
EPECstrainsmaycarrytwotccPvariants,tccPand/ortccP2, sug-gesting thatsomeaEPECstrainsmay usebothTir-Nck and Tir-TccPpathwaystopromoteactinpolymerization.100
Inter-estingly,Rochaandcolleagues101showedthattransformation
ofanon-adherent aEPECstrain(serotypeO88:HNM) witha TccPexpressing-plasmid,conferredthisstraintheabilityto adheretoandtoinduceactin-accumulationinHeLacells.
TheoccurrenceandprevalenceofNleinaEPECstrainshave been recentlyreviewed.67 Ithasbeensuggestedthat
differ-entisolatescanemploydistinctstrategiestopromotedamage tothe hostandcause disease.45 In addition,the Nle
effec-tors Ibe(invasionofendothelialcells) andEspT have been originallydescribedandcharacterizedinaEPECstrains.102,103
IbeappearstoregulateTirphosphorylationandtoenhance actinpolymerizationandpedestalformation,103whileEspT104
modulatesactindynamics,leadingtomembranerufflingand cell invasion, and induces macrophages to produce inter-leukinsIL-8andIL-1andPGE2.102
Invasionofepithelialcellsinvitroinanintimin-dependent pathwayhasbeendescribedinanaEPECstrain,105butfurther
studiespointedoutthattheinvasivephenotypeisnota com-mon characteristic among aEPEC.106 Despite their invasive
potentialinvitro,107mostaEPECareconsideredextracellular
pathogens.5
Ithasbeenshownthatapicalinfectionofculturedhuman mucin-secreting intestinal HT29-MTX cells by some aEPEC strainsmay induceincreasedproductionofsecretedMUC2 andMUC5ACmucinsandmembrane-boundMUC3andMUC4 mucins.108Thisobservationsuggeststhattheapically
adher-ingbacteriacouldexploitlargeamountsofmucinstogrow moreefficientlyinthehostintestines,characterizinga puta-tivenewvirulencemechanisminaEPEC.108
ATproteinshavealsobeenshowntobeproducedbysome aEPECstrains.67Abreuandcollegues109haveshownthatthe
ATproteinencodedbythe ehaCgene,which isinvolvedin biofilmformationinEHECstrains,wasthemostfrequent,with asignificantlyhigherprevalencethanintEPEC.Althoughthe prevalenceoftheATproteinPic(proteininvolvedinintestinal colonization),formerlyidentifiedinEAEC,isnotacommon findinginaEPECstrains,italsoappearstomediate coloniza-tionofmouseintestines,hemagglutination,mucincleavage, andcomplementcomponentsdegradation.110Morerecently,
some aEPEC strains were shown to cause cell damage by secretingtheATproteinPet(plasmidencodedtoxin)tothe extracellularenvironment.111
Epidemiology
TheprevalenceofEPECinfectionsvariesbetween epidemio-logicalstudiesonthebasisofdifferencesinstudypopulations, agedistributions, andmethods(serotyping, adherence pat-terns,andpresenceoftheeaeorconservedLEEgenes)used fordetectionanddiagnosis.112Inaddition,differencesin
geo-graphicregions,periodsoftimeandsocioeconomicclassmay alsocontributetodifferencesinthe epidemiologyof EPEC-induceddiarrhealdisease.113Lackofdiscriminationbetween
tEPECandaEPECinsomestudiesalsomakessuchanalysis difficult.
DiarrheaduetotEPECdecreaseswithage,andinfectionsin adultsarerarelyreported.Thisapparentresistanceinadults andolderchildrenhasbeenattributedtothelossofspecific receptorswithageordevelopmentofimmunity.6
For many decades, studies conducted worldwide have shownthattEPECserotypesarestronglyassociatedwith diar-rheainchildren<1 yearofage,mainly inpoorchildrenin urbancenters.6,12,15Theassociationwithdiarrheawas
partic-ularlystrongininfantslessthan6monthsofage.Studiesin Brazil,Chile,Mexico,andSouthAfrica,showedthat30–40%of infantilediarrheacaseswereduetotEPECserotypes.15,112,114
However, the epidemiology of EPEC infections has shifted. Innumerousdevelopingcountries,wherethe prevalenceof EPECinfectionhadbeenhighuntilthe1990s,recentstudies havenotidentifieda significantassociation betweentEPEC and infantile diarrhea. In Brazil, 92% of EPEC isolates col-lectedfromchildrenbetween2001and2002wereatypical,115
comparedto38%ina1998–1999study.79However,other
stud-iesstillreporttEPECbeingmoreprevalent thanaEPECasa causeofdiarrhea.116Inaddition,insomelessdevelopedareas
(Africa and Asia),tEPEC are still someof the most impor-tantenteropathogens.117–122Basedontherecentlycompleted
Global Enteric Multicenter Study(GEMS) involving children
lessthan5yearsofagefromsevensitesinAfricaandAsia, tEPEC wassignificantlyassociatedwithmoderate tosevere diarrheainchildrenunder2yearsofageinKenya,whereas aEPECwasnotassociatedwiththistypeofdiarrhea.118
Transmission of tEPEC follows a fecal-oral process throughcontaminatedsurfaces,weaningfluids,andhuman carriers.123 Although rare, outbreaks among adults seem
to occur through the ingestion of contaminated food and water;however,nospecificenvironmentalreservoirhasbeen identified.6Theinfectivedoseinadultvolunteersishigh,at
108to1010organisms,124whiletheinfectivedosethatcauses
disease inchildrenisunknown. EPECoutbreakshave been reportedtoshowaseasonaldistributionwithpeaksduring thewarmmonths.6,125Humansaretheonlyknownreservoir
fortEPEC,withsymptomaticandasymptomaticchildrenand asymptomaticadultsbeingthemostlikelysource.6
IncontrasttotEPEC,aEPEChavebeenfoundindiarrheic patientsofallagesandinadultswithHIV-AIDS.82,126–128
Fur-thermore,theproportionofaEPECstrainshasincreased,and aEPECstrainshaveoutnumberedtEPECstrainsandhavealso beenassociatedwithchildhooddiarrheainsomedeveloping anddevelopedcountries.12,18,67,91,112,129However,theincrease
inprevalenceofaEPECmayalsoreflecttherefined discrimi-nationbetweentEPECandaEPEC.12,18,91
TheroleofaEPECindiarrheaisnotclearbecauseofits detectionatsimilarratesinbothdiarrheicandnon-diarrheic patientsinvariousgeographicalareas.18,91,128Instudies
con-ducted in the last five years, aEPEC have been found at rates varying from ∼0.05 to ∼12% in diarrheic versus 0 to ∼14%innon-diarrheicpatients.67Somerecentstudieshave
alsoimplicatedaEPECasthecauseofpersistentandbloody diarrhea.18,91 Moreover,aEPECstrainshavebeenassociated
with diarrheal outbreaks in Finland, United States, Japan, China18,91,112andBrazil.85
IncontrasttotEPEC,whichareseldomfoundinanimals,12
many aEPECstrainshavebeenfoundinbothdiarrheicand healthyanimals.18,67Interestingly,animalaEPECserogroups
associated withhumandiarrhea have been identified (e.g., O26, O103, O119, O128, O142and O157).18,130,131 Serotyping
andmolecularmethodssuchasmultilocussequencetyping (MSLT)andpulsedfieldgelelectrophoresis(PFGE)have con-tributedtodemonstratingthatdomesticandwildanimalsand the environmentare potentialsourcesofaEPECforhuman infectionsinseveralregions.18,67,91,131Therefore,althoughno
directtransmissionfromanimalstohumanshasbeenshown sofar,itisreasonabletosuggestthatsomeaEPECstrainsare potentially zoonotic pathogens,withalargevarietyof ani-malspeciesservingasimportantreservoirs.67,91Inaddition,
foods includingrawmeat, pasteurizedmilkand vegetables andwaterhavealsobeenimplicatedasvehiclesofaEPECin humaninfections.67
aEPECstrainscompriseaveryassortedgroupwithvarious additionalvirulencemechanismsthataltogethercan modu-latethediseaseoutcomeortheiroccurrenceinasymptomatic persons.Therehavebeencontinuousadvancesinour knowl-edgeofthegeneticbackgroundandpathogenicityofaEPEC aswellasintheinformationgatheredfromepidemiological studies,and may contributetothediscrimination between strains that cause diarrhea and those that cause asymp-tomaticinfections.
Detectionanddiagnosis
EPEC canbe detected byDNA probes or PCRassays using primerstargetingtheeaeandstxgenes.132,133Alleae-positive
andstx-negativeE.colistrainsarefurthertestedbyPCRfor thepresenceofthebfpAgeneencodingbundlin6and/orthe
EAF plasmid todifferentiatetEPEC from aEPEC.134,135
How-ever,thismay failtoidentifyall bfpA-positiveEPECstrains, sincemultipleallelesofbfpAhavebeenidentified,136
suggest-ingthatsomecurrent PCRmethodsmay failtoidentifyall
bfpA-positiveEPECstrains.
However,in routine microbiology laboratories,all E. coli
coloniesobtainedfromprimaryisolationplatesare tradition-allyscreenedbyslideagglutinationassaysusingseraagainst theclassicalEPECserogroupsO26,O55,O86,O111,O114,O119, O125,O126, O127,O128,O142, andO158.137 Thismethodis
practicalandeasytoperform,themainadvantageofwhichis thecommercialavailabilityofthesera.However,the disadvan-tageofthismethodistheheterogeneityofEPECserogroups thatcancomprisecategoriesotherthanEPEC,theinabilityto distinguishtEPECfromaEPECwithintheseserogroups,and theoccurrenceofEPECstrainsbelongingtoserogroupsother thantheclassicalEPECserogroups.12,18,138,139
SinceEPEC strainsare definedbased on their virulence properties,asetofproteins,includingintimin,BFPandT3SS secretedproteinscanbeconsideredtargetsfordiagnosis.BFP expressionhas been considered the phenotypic marker of tEPEC.18,78,140Immunofluorescenceandimmunoblottingtests
usingmonoclonalorpolyclonalantibodiesagainstBFPhave beenemployed.141,142Thesecitedauthorsdetectedthe
pro-ductionof BFPon different media, inwhich theyreported that 91% ofthe tEPEC strains tested produced BFP in Dul-becco’sModifiedEagleMedium(DMEM),89%inMacConkey, and83% inEMB agars.Theseresultsare particularly inter-esting,sinceMacConkeyand EMBagars are routinely used for the identification of lactose-fermenting E. coli isolated fromdiarrhealstools.AcolonyimmunoblotassayfortEPEC detection based on BFP expression was also standardized usingarabbittEPECanti-BFPpolyclonalserum. Standardiza-tionwasdoneaftergrowingthebacterialisolatesonDMEM agarcontainingfetal bovineserumortrypticsoyagar con-taining5%washed sheepblood (TSAB).Thistestshowed a positivityof92and83%andspecificityof96and97%, respec-tively,whentheculturewasdoneinDMEMandTSAB.This method combines the simplicity of an immunoserological assaywiththehighefficiencyoftestingalargenumberofEPEC colonies.140
Concerning intimin detection, a rabbit polyclonal sera raisedagainsttheconservedregionofintimin(Int388-667)143 wasemployedinordertodetecttEPECisolatesexpressing␣, ,␥,␦andintiminreportedanapplicationof immunoblot-tingwith100%specificityand97%sensitivityinthedetection of eae positive E. coli strains.144–146 These authors clearly
demonstrated thatpolyclonalrabbitantiseraissuitable for immunoblottingasadiagnostictool,andshowedthatprotein denaturation and linearization is a critical step for anti-intimin antibody accessibility.Indeed, even employing the recombinantantibodysuchassinglechainfragmentvariable (scFv-intimin),147,148merelybyimmunofluorescencethe
scFv-intiminwasabletodetecttEPEC,aEPEC,andEHECisolates,
showingthatintimincanbeatargetforEPECandEHEC diag-nosisafterbacterialpermeabilization.148
Regardingsecretedproteins,Luetal.149developedanew
practical method to identify EPEC by detecting the E. coli
secreted protein B (EspB) in the culture supernatant by reversedpassivelatexagglutination(RPLA),afterthestrains havebeencultivatedinDMEM.Inaddition,Nakasoneetal.,150
establishedarapidimmunochromatographic(IC)testto iden-tify the presence of EspB in EPEC and EHEC isolates. The detectionlimitofthetesthasbeenreportedtobe4ng/mL,and theresultsshowed96.9%sensitivityand100%specificity.The ICtestforthedetectionofEspBmaybeapracticalmethod todefineEPECorEHECbothinclinicallaboratoriesandthe field.150
In addition, arapidagglutination testusing latexbeads coatedwithanti-EspBmAbwasstandardized,showing97% sensitivity, 98% specificity and 97% efficiency, which is requiredforthediagnosisofenteropathogenicdiseasesand canbeemployedindevelopingcountrieswithpoorlyequipped laboratories.151
Enterohemorrhagic
(Shiga
toxin-producing)
E.
coli
(EHEC/STEC)
EHEC/STEC represent a well-known group of foodborne pathogensdistributedworldwide.Theabilitytoproduceone or more ofthe Shiga toxin (Stx) family cytotoxins152
con-stitutes the mainvirulence attribute ofthis pathogroupof
E. coli. A wide array of infections from mild and almost unapparent diarrhea to more serious manifestations such as hemorrhagic colitis(HC) and the developmentofa life-threateningsyndromeknownashemolyticuremicsyndrome (HUS)arecausedbyEHEC/STEC.Infantsandchildrenarethe mainaffectedpatients,andalthoughtheincidenceof infec-tion variesindifferentregions,the impactandimportance ofEHEC/STECinfectionsinpublichealthisimmense,being the main cause ofacute renal failure in childrenin many countries.TheperspectiveofEHEC/STECinfectionshasbeen previouslydescribed,153,154butaconsiderableamountof
infor-mationhasbeenobtainedinmorerecentyearsrelatedtothe epidemiology,ecologyandvirulencepropertiesofthese bacte-ria.
E. coliO157:H7serotype wasthefirst tobelinkedtoHC and HUScasesintheearly1980s,andhasbeensincethen responsible fornumerous outbreaks and sporadic casesof severediseasesallovertheworld,thereforeconsideredtobe theprototypeofthispathogenicgroupofbacteria.155Itiswell
knownthathundredsofotherE.coliserotypescanharborthe
stxgenes,butepidemiologicalstudiescarriedoutworldwide haveproventhatonlysomeofthemhavebeenresponsible forcausinghumandiseases.SomeserogroupsincludingO26, O45,O103,O111, O121andO145canbehighlightedamong thosemostcommonlyrelatedtohumaninfections.156
More-over,inrecentyearstheemergenceofsomeparticularclones suchasthehybridO104:H4enteroaggregativeE.colicarrying Stx2 genes, responsibleforasevereoutbreak ofHUS start-inginGermanyin2011,157thespreadofanewO26:H11clone
themobilityofgenesandcertainlythehostbackgroundare importantfeaturesimplicatedintheirpathogenicpotential.
Virulencefactors,mechanismsandpathogenesis
ThecommonfeatureamongEHEC/STECisolatesisthe abil-ity to produce Stx. This family oftoxins has a conserved AB5 subunit structure, composed of one active A subunit
linkedtoapentameric Bsubunit responsibleforthe bind-ingofthetoxintospecificglycolipidreceptorsonthesurface oftarget cells. Thestx operon is usuallyfound withinthe sequence foraninducible, lysogenic,lambda-like bacterio-phage.Stxsinhibitproteinsynthesisbyremovinganadenine residuefromthe28SrRNAofthe60Sribosome.152However,
besidesthisactivity,studieshavedescribedthatStxalsoacts oncellsignaltransductionandimmunemodulationcausing proinflammatoryandpro-apoptoticresponses.159Twomajor
families, Stx1 and Stx2, havebeen recognized, and on the basisofsequencediversity,eachiscomposedofseveral vari-ants.TheStx1familyismorehomogenousandincludesStx1a, Stx1candStx1d;whiletheheterogenousStx2groupis com-posedofStx2a,Stx2b,Stx2c,Stx2d,Stx2e,Stx2f,andStx2g.160 Itshould bementioned that the association of some vari-ants such as Stx2a, Stx2c or Stx2d with HC and HUS has beenhighlighted comparedtosomeothers thatseemed to bemorerelatedtouncomplicatedcasesofdiarrheasuchas Stx1variantsorevenStx2e,Stx2fandStx2g,whichare uncom-monlyfoundcausinghumaninfectionssofar.161,162 Indeed,
thehigherassociationofStx2withseverediseaseshasbeen extensivelystudiedbyusingVeroand endothelialcelllines aswellassomeanimalmodels.159 Moreover,knowledgeof
stxphagecharacteristicsandbehaviorhashelpedour under-standing of how differences in expression ofStx between EHEC/STEC isolates may contribute to pathogenesis and disease.163
The ability to adhere to intestinal epithelial cells is another key event in EHEC/STEC pathogenesis. The pres-ence ofthe chromosomal pathogenicityisland LEE,164 also present in isolates belonging to the EPEC pathotype, is common. Although LEE has been described in the major EHEC/STEC serotypes responsible for a high proportion of HCandHUScasesinseveralcountries,itspresenceisnota requiredconditionfortheoccurrenceofmoreserious infec-tionsasinitiallythought,becausesomeLEE-negativestrains arealsocapableofcausingoutbreaksandsporadiccasesof HUS.165,166
Therefore,itisclearthatEHEC/STECpathogenesisisa mul-tistepprocess,andbesidestheproductionofStxtoxinsand theAElesion,otherfactorsincludingdifferenttypesoftoxins andadhesinshavebeendescribedandfoundtobeinvolvedin virulence.159
One should also consider that as a pathogen of the human gastrointestinal tract the ability of EHEC/STEC to monitor nutrients in the gut milieu, and translate this information to sense the host physiological state in order to program the expression of its virulence mark-ers has a pivotal role on the development of infection.167
In addition, it has been shown that EHEC/STEC can also cross-communicate with the host by exploiting the autoinducer-3 (AI-3)/epinephrine/norepinephrine signaling
systemtoexpresstwoimportantvirulencetraits,motilityand A/Elesion,requiredatdifferenttimepointsduringintestinal colonization.168
Theabilitytoadhere,colonizeandformbiofilmonfood andseveraltypesofsurfacesmaybeawaytobean impor-tantsourceand/orvehicleoftransmissionofEHEC/STEC.In addition,biofilmmayalsoactasbacterialprotectionagainst adverseenvironmentalconditions.Astudyconductedby Bis-cola et al.,169 evaluated the capacity of biofilm formation
inEHEC/STECstrainsisolatedfrom differentreservoirsand serotypes. Theauthors observed that the abilitytoadhere to abiotic surfaces formingbiofilms, under definedculture conditions,occurredinanarrayofwild-typeO157and non-O157 strains. Biofilm production was identified in several non-O157 STECserotypes ofhuman, animal, andfood ori-gin.Ontheotherhand,amongtheO157strains,onlythose isolatedfromtheanimalreservoirandfromawatersample produced biofilm. A close correlation between biofilm for-mation and expressionofcurli fimbriaeand cellulose was observedamongO157strains.However,inadditiontocurli, thepresenceofotherfactorssuchastype1fimbriaeandAT proteinsmaybeassociatedwiththeabilitytoformbiofilmin non-O157strains.Matheus-Guimarãesetal.,170studiedO157
andnon-O157EHEC/STECstrainsisolatedfrombovinehides andcarcassesandshowedthatdifferentsetsofgeneswere involvedinthe interactions ofthebacteria withbioticand abiotic surfaces. Moreover, the detectionof anO157 strain thatwasabletoformbiofilmonbothglassandpolystyrene and thatadheredtoandinvadedhumancells,suggestsan importantabilityofthisisolatetopersistintheenvironment and interact with the host. In fact, cell invasion and sur-vivalofsomeEHEC/STECstrainsinculturedhumanintestinal epithelialcellshasbeenpreviouslydescribed.171Itshouldbe
mentionedthatthisinvasivecharacteristichasbeenidentified insomeEHEC/STECserotypes,manyofwhichare responsi-ble forhumaninfections.170–173 Therefore, it isconceivable
that this virulencestrategymay helpbacteria toovercome hostdefensemechanismsandcertainlycontributestotheir persistenceinthezoonoticreservoir,ensuringefficient envi-ronmentalandfoodtransmission.
Anothertopicofinteresthasbeentheanalysisand com-parisonofthevirulenceprofileofEHEC/STECstrainsisolated fromtheanimalreservoirandenvironmentwithstrains recov-eredfromhumaninfections.Ingeneral,thesestudieshave shownthatdespiteserotypediversity,thestxsubtypes and thevirulenceprofileidentifiedamongisolatesfromtheanimal reservoirandenvironmentaresimilartotheisolates recov-eredfrompatients.173,178–180Therehasbeenparticularinterest
insomeSTECserotypesthathavebeenresponsibleforcausing severehumaninfections,suchasO113:H21,butunlikeothers, theydonotproduceadhesinsencodedbyLEE.ByusingaPCR microarray,41virulenceorgeneticmarkersweretestedina panelof65O113:H21strainsisolatedfromclinicalinfections, environmentandfoodfromvariouscountries.174Theresults
obtainedshowednocleardifferencesinthesegenetic mark-ersbetweenthepathogensrecoveredfromHUScasesandthe environmentalstrains.Moreover,onlystxsubtypesassociated withhumaninfectionswereidentifiedinallisolates,therefore suggestingthattheenvironmentalisolateshavethepotential tocausehumandiseases.
Epidemiology
TheincidenceofHUScasesinBrazilislow,175andalthough
somehypothesishasbeenproposedtoexplainthisfact,there arelimiteddataontheimmuneresponseagainstStx.Inan attempttoovercomethis gap,prevalenceofanti-Stx2 anti-bodiesinseraofchildrendiagnosedwithHUSandofhealthy childrenwasrecentlydetermined.176Thepercentageof
indi-vidualsshowingantibodiesagainstStx2 washigheramong HUSpatients thancontrols, andthe resultsalsoconfirmed thatSTECstrainsarecirculatinginoursettingsdespitethe lownumberofidentifiedHUScases.
Among the several serotypes associated with human infections,O157:H7isresponsibleformoreseverecases. Epi-demiologicalinvestigationsofdiarrhealoutbreaksconducted infourBrazilianstatesshowedthatO157:H7strainswere iso-latedfromtwohospitalizedpatients,onewithHUSandthe otherwithbloodydiarrhea.177Besides,O157:H7,EHEC/STEC
strains belongingto the top sixmost important non-O157 serogroupssuchasO26,O103,O111 andO145 were identi-fied,allofwhichwererecoveredfromambulatorypatients. Inaddition,someuncommonserogroupsincludingO1,O24 and O77 among others were also detected, but they were all associatedwithacute diarrhea. Itisinteresting tonote thatthemajorityofpatientsfromwhomSTECwasisolated were female (57%), and that patients’ ages ranged from 8 monthsto80years,withmostbeinglessthanfiveyearsold (54%).177
ThedistributionofEHEC/STECinthegastrointestinaltract ofawide varietyofanimals indicatesthezoonotic charac-terofitsinfections.Theroleofdifferentanimalspeciesas asymptomatic carriers of EHEC/STEC has been extensively studied in the last years in Brazil. Besides cattle, which are their most common natural reservoir,173,178 the
pres-ence of these pathogens has been identified in the feces of dairy buffaloes,179 sheep,180,181 pigs,182,183 birds,184 and
fishes.185Itisnoteworthythatsomerelevantserotypeslinked
to human infections such as O103:H2 and O157:H7 have been recovered from the feces of sheep186 and cattle173
respectively. Additionally, the high prevalence of O157:H7 EHEC/STEC strains identified in hides of cattle sent to slaughter in a Brazilian processing plant178 certainly
rep-resents a relevant issue that should be considered when thinkingaboutinterventionstargetingEHEC/STECrelatedto animal handling, from farm to slaughter, as well as the implementation of food safety throughoutproduction and processing.
ThepresenceofEHEC/STECintheenvironmentisanother issueofconcern,sincetheycansurviveinthesoil,manure, pasturesandwater,whichthusrepresentimportantvehicles oftransmission. The isolation ofSTEC strains from drink-ing water supplies, collected in different municipalities in northernParanáState,hasbeenrecentlydescribed, highlight-ing the importanceofdrinking water, especiallythat from untreatedwatersupplies,asasourceofSTECstrains poten-tially pathogenic for humans.187 Taking into account that
chickenlitterisveryusefulasanorganicsoilfertilizerforthe productionoffruitsandvegetablesinoursettings,the detec-tionofSTECinorganicchickenfertilizerusedonfarms188also
representsasignificantpublichealthsafetyhazard.
Although data on the detection of EHEC/STEC in foods in Brazil are stillscarce, the isolationand identification of O157:H7serotypefromagroundbeefsamplewasdescribedfor thefirsttime,189whileO125:H19andO149:H8STECserotypes
were found in refrigerated raw kibbe collected from retail establishments.190 On the other hand, EHEC/STEChas not
beendetectedinpasteurizedcow’smilksamplescollectedin dairiesinnorthwesternParanáState191orinrawmilk,
pas-teurizedmilk,MinasFrescalcheeseandgroundbeefsamples collectedinMinasGerais.192Oneshouldbeawarethatdespite
difficultiesinthedetectionandisolationofEHEC/STECfrom foods,theimplementationofthemostsensitivemethodsin mostlaboratoriesshouldbethemaingoalinthenearfuture tohelpintheanalysisoftheriskposedbyfoodsasvehiclesof STECtransmissiontohumans.
Detectionanddiagnosis
AnimportantconcernishowtodetectShigatoxin-producing strainseitherinstoolsofinfectedpatientsorcontaminated food, sinceselectiveenrichmentisnecessary.193,194 For rou-tinediagnosis,someprotocolshavealreadybeendescribed.139
However,thegoldstandardforStxdetectionisstillthe eval-uation ofthe cytotoxicityofbacterial culturesupernatants to eukaryoticcells.195,196 Thus, multiplexPCRincluding stx
geneandothervirulencegenescouldbeusefulinscreening for STEC using bacterial confluent growth zones or sor-bitol fermenting and non-fermenting colonies taken from SMAC.197
Numerous assays for the diagnosis of STEC have been developed on the basis of the detection of Stx1 and/or Stx2, which representsthe major virulence factors of this
E.colicategory.198Sensitivitiesandspecificitiesvaryaccording
to the test format and the manufacturer.199–205
Neverthe-less,thestandardbywhicheachmanufacturerevaluatesits tests also varies; therefore, a direct comparison of perfor-mancecharacteristicsofvariousimmunoassayshasnotbeen performed.198,206,207 Moreover,thesecommerciallyavailable
testsarenotaffordablefordevelopingcountries.Thus,to out-linethis,previousworkshaveestablisheddifferentformatsof immunoassays,employingeitheramixtureofrabbitanti-Stx1 andanti-Stx2serabyindirectELISAorpolyclonaland mono-clonalantibodiesinacaptureELISAassayforthedetectionof STEC.207–209Thestandardizedmethodsarereproducible,fast,
easytoperform,showinghighsensitivityindetectingStxby captureELISA,eveninlow-producingisolates.Theseassays havenotyetbeenevaluatedintermsofindustrialquality con-trolandcommercialavailability,buttheestimatedcostofthe assayisaroundUS$70per96detections,whichisrealistically inexpensivefordevelopingcountries.
Thesemonoclonalantibodieswererebuiltresultingin sin-glechainfragmentvariable(scFv)fragments.Stx2-scFvwas obtainedfromabacteria-inducedcultureand showed diag-nostic ability;the scFvfragmentwas able torecognize the majority of Stx2-producing strains, with 79.3% sensitivity (confidence interval of 60.3 to92%), and no reactivity was observedwiththenon-producingstrains,indicatingashigh as100%specificity(confidenceintervalof86.8–100%).210Itis
immunoenzymatic tests forStx1/2 toxin detection employ recombinantantibodiesproducedinbacteria,whichindeed willreducethecostsofthediagnosticassays.198
Enteroaggregative
E.
coli
EAECisthediarrheagenicE.colipathotypedefinedbyshowing thecharacteristicAApatternonepithelialcellsinculture.211
TheAApatternwasdefinedin1987whenNataroetal.,212 dis-tinguishedthepreviouslydescribed“diffuseadherence”asthe trulydiffuseadherence(DA)andtheAApattern.Thestandard AAwascharacterizedbyadherentbacteriainastacked-brick arrangement onthe surface ofepithelial cells and alsoon the coverslip betweencells.Strains displaying the AA pat-tern were then categorized as “enteroadherent-aggregative
E.coli”butafterwardsthecategorywascalled enteroaggrega-tiveE.coliorEAEC,thecurrentnomenclature.Thedetection ofAAin vitroisstillthegoldstandard testtodefineEAEC; however,asdescribed before,theAApatternmaybefound instrainsofotherDECpathotypes,suchasaEPEC.Therefore, anup-to-date definitionofEAECisthe diarrheagenicE.coli
thatproduceAAinculturedepithelialcellsbutlackthemain geneticmarkersthatdefineotherDECpathotypes(EPEC,ETEC, EHEC,EIEC).AnexceptionforthatisthehybridEAEC/STEC strainresponsibleforamassiveoutbreakofdiarrheaandHUS in2011inEurope.213 ThisstrainconsistsofanEAECstrain
thatacquiredtheStx2-encodingphage.Therefore,thisspecific O104:H4strainisaStx-producingEAEC.
DiarrheacausedbyEAECiswatery, oftenwiththe pres-enceofmucus,withorwithout bloodandabdominalpain, vomitingand low fever.Acute self-limiting diarrhea isthe usualpathology,but somepatientsmaydevelopprotracted diarrhea,i.e.,lasting morethan 14days.214 Prolonged
diar-rheaoccurs depending onthe host’s immunity,nutritional statusand geneticsusceptibility.215 Genetic susceptibilities
associatedwithEAECdiarrheawereidentifiedinNorth Amer-ican travelersto Mexico. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP)in the IL-8 genepromoter and the promotor regions ofthegenesencodinglactoferrin,CD14andosteoprotegerin aswellwererecognizedasindicatorsforsymptomaticEAEC infection.216–219
A well-described characteristic of EAEC strains is their heterogeneous nature when serotypes, genetic markers of virulenceandphylogenetic groupsareanalyzed.220–225 This
indicatesthat onlyEAECstrains carryingspecific virulence factors are able tocause diarrhea.While these factors are unknown,somestudieshavedemonstratedtheassociation ofspecificvirulencegeneswithdiarrhea,suchaspetoraafA
inBrazil226andsepAinMali.223
Virulencefactors,mechanismsandpathogenesis
MostofourknowledgeaboutEAECpathogenesisisbasedon dataaccumulatedfromstudies withEAECstrain042, since itsassociationwithhumandiarrheainavolunteerstudy.227
Theseputativevirulencefactorsincludeadhesins,toxinsand secretedproteins.However,noneofthesefactorsarefoundin allEAECstrains.
Themajorityofthesevirulencefactorsareplasmidborne, including those mediating AA. Consequently, these high-molecular-weightplasmidsarecalledpAA.220Baudryetal.,228
developedageneticprobe(CVD432)forEAECdiagnosisonthe basisofafragmentfrompAA1presentinEAECstrain17-2. InEAEC042,manyputativevirulencefactorsarepresentin pAA2.220
Recently,adivisionofEAECstrainsintotypicalor atypi-calsubgroupswasproposed.Thisclassificationisbasedon thepresenceorabsenceofaggR,agenethatencodesaglobal regulatorofEAECvirulencegenes.229Therefore,ithasbeen
proposedthattypicalEAEChavemorepathogenicpotential bythepresenceoftheAggRregulonand,consequently,pAA virulencefactors.230However,atleasttwooutbreaksof
diar-rheawerecausedbyatypicalEAEC,231,232andatypicalEAEC
arecommonlyisolatedfromchildrenwithdiarrhea,insome casesmorefrequentlythantypicalstrains.233,234
Numerousadhesins,cytotoxins,enterotoxinsandsecreted proteinshavebeen characterizedinEAECstrainssincethis pathotypedefinition.211,214
Themoststudiedadhesinsaretheaggregativeadherence fimbria(AAF/I-AAF/V)family,whichincludesfivetypes.235–239
TheymediatetheAApatternandbiofilmformation.Afimbrial adhesinshavealsobeencharacterizedinEAECstrains, includ-ing outermembraneproteinsbetween30and58kDa.240–242
However, it has been shown that these structures are presentinlowfrequenciesinEAECcollectionsfromdifferent settings.221,226,243–245
Locatedin pAA2ofEAEC042 isthe aapgene, encoding an antiaggregationproteincalleddispersin.246 Thisprotein
is secreted and linked to lipopolysaccharide, neutralizing the negativechargeofthebacterialsurfaceleading toAAF projection and consequent dispersion along the intestinal mucosa.247 Although immunogenic, dispersin is found in
otherE.colipathotypesandincommensalE.coli.248
VarioustoxinshavebeendescribedinEAECinassociation with the cytotoxic or enterotoxic effects of culture super-natantsinvitro.Theheat-stabletoxinenteroaggregativeE.coli
heat-stableenterotoxin1(EAST-1)wasthefirsttoxin charac-terizedintheEAECpathotype.249EAST-1activatesadenylate
cyclaseinducingincreasedcyclicGMPlevels,effectsobserved inaUssingchamberwithrabbitileum.250ShET1isanA:Btype
toxinthatcausesaccumulationoffluidinrabbitilealloopsand hassecretoryresponseinUssingchamberassays.251,252
ThetwoATproteinscharacterizedinEAEC042, Petand Pic,253–254 are members of the serine protease
autotrans-portersofEnterobacteriaceae,orSPATE.255Petisacytotoxin
that modifies the cytoskeleton of enterocytes, leading to roundingandcelldetachment.Thecytotoxicmechanismof Petarisesfromthedegradationof␣-fodrin,amembrane pro-tein of the enterocytes.256 Pic is a multitask protein that
mediateshemagglutination,mucuscleavageand hypersecre-tion, intestinal colonization in mice, cleavage of surface glycoproteinsinvolvedinleukocytetraffickingandcleavageof keycomplementmolecules.257,258Thephenotypesidentified forPicsuggestitsroleinpromotingcolonizationofthe intes-tineandimmunesystemevasion.SPATEsareimmunogenic proteins, as evidenced by the presence ofserum antibod-iesagainstPetandPicinchildrenrecoveringfromdiarrhea causedbyEAEC.259
In the years that followed the definition of EAEC as a pathotype, research in the field was dedicated to prove the pathogenic capacity of EAEC using different animal models260–262andhumanvolunteersreceivingoralinoculum
ofdifferentEAECstrains.227,235,263 Notall volunteers
devel-opeddiarrheaafteringestionofdifferent EAECstrains,the firstevidencethatstrainsofthispathotypeareheterogeneous. Amongthestrainstested,EAEC042(serotypeO44:H18)caused diarrheainthreeoutoffivevolunteers.227Sincethen,strain
042hasbeenconsideredtheprototypeEAECstrainandis cer-tainlythemoststudiedstrainofthepathotype.264EAEC042
wasisolatedfromacaseofacuteinfantilediarrheainPeru.265 Theclinicaldataobtainedfromthevolunteerswhodeveloped diarrheasuggestedthatEAEC042causedsecretorydiarrhea, withabundantpresenceofmucusandabsenceofbloodinthe stool.
StudiesemployingdifferentEAECstrainsinteractingwith intestinalcellsfromanimalsorhumanshavebeenperformed toelucidatethe pathogenesisofthis pathotype.Data from theseinvitro,invivoand exvivoexperimentsstrongly indi-catethatEAECcanbindtojejunal,ilealandcolonicepithelium in the characteristic aggregative pattern, forming a strong biofilminamucuslayer,followedbycytotoxicand proinflam-matoryeffects.260,266–270Fragmentsfromterminalileumand
colonexcisedfrom pediatricand adultpatientswere incu-batedwithEAECstrainsthatwerecapabletocolonizetheileal andcolonicmucosainthetypicalstacked-brickpatternover anaugmentedmucuslayer.270
Alltheselinesofevidenceincombinationwiththe iden-tification of several putative virulence factors inprototype EAECstrainsallowedtheproposalofathree-stagemodelof EAECpathogenesis:(a)abundantadherencetotheintestinal mucosa,(b)productionofcytotoxinsandenterotoxins,and (c)inductionofmucosal inflammation.211Inthefirst stage,
the contributionoffimbrial andafimbrial adhesinsaswell asotheradhesivestructuresisessential.Severalcolonization factorshavebeenidentifiedinEAECstrains.271Inthisstage,a
characteristicincreasedsecretionofmucusontheintestinal mucosaleadstotheformationofastrongbiofilmwhereEAEC areembedded.234,266,272Inthefollowingstep,EAECproduce
cytotoxiceffectsontheintestinalmucosaduetothesecretion oftoxins, inducingmicrovillusvesiculation, enlarged crypt openings,andincreasedepithelialcellextrusion.266,273
EAEC-induced inflammationresultsfrom the strong colonization ofthe intestinalmucosa;however,all bacterialfactorsthat contributetothisconditionhavenotbeenidentified. Inflam-matory markers such asIL-8, IL-1, interferon (INF)-␥ and lactoferrinhavebeendetectedinstoolsofchildrenandadults colonized byEAEC.274–276 Althoughthis modelsummarizes
the data so far obtainedusing in vivo,in vitro and ex vivo
approachesitmaynotbevalidforallstrains.
Alargefoodborne outbreakofbloodydiarrheaand HUS occurredin2011inEurope,affectingmorethan4000patients, most of them from Germany. This outbreak was caused byaStx2-producingE.colistrain belongingtotheserotype O104:H4.Thegenomeofthatstrainwasrapidlysequenced, revealinga unique hybrid combination ofEAEC and STEC,
i.e. the EAEC strain Ec55989 harboring the Shiga toxin 2-encodingprophage.166,213Severalvirulencefactorsoftypical
EAECarepresentinthatstrain,includingAggR,dispersin,Pic
andShET-1. AlsoexpressedaretwoShigellaautotransporter proteinscalledSigAand SepA,implicatedinmucosal dam-age and colonization.277,278 Interestingly,the EAEC Ec55989
is the prototype strain for AAF/III.237 Conversely, the
out-breakhybridstrainproducesAAF/I,showingthattheoutbreak EAEC/STECacquiredanAAF/I-encodingplasmid.166,279Ithas
been proposedthat thepresenceofthesevirulencefactors combinedisresponsibleforthehighlyvirulentattributesof thatstrain.166,213
Epidemiology
EAECisanemergingpathogenaffectingchildrenandadults worldwide,responsibleforcasesofacuteandpersistent diar-rhea. Nevertheless,the mostimportantimpactintermsof morbidityisamongchildrenyoungerthan5yearslivingin developing countries.214 A meta-analysis study of the
lit-erature on the epidemiology ofdiarrhea that included the searchofEAECshowedastatisticalassociationofEAECwith acute and persistentdiarrheaindevelopedand developing countries,withdiarrheainHIV-infectedpatientsindeveloping countries,andadulttraveler’sdiarrhea.280 Inanother meta-analysis studyEAECwas associatedwithacutediarrheain childrenlivinginSouthAsiancountries.281
It is important to mention that data on the epidemi-ology ofEAECinfection are somewhat inconsistent dueto largevariationintermsofmethodofdetection,geographical locationandpatientageandsocioeconomicstatus. Nonethe-less,EAEChasbeensystematicallyidentifiedasanemerging enteropathogen,stronglyassociatedwithacute and persis-tentdiarrheainchildrenofdevelopingcountries.Moreover,in developedcountries,EAEChavebeenfrequentlyisolatedfrom casesofdiarrheainchildrenandadultsinthelastyears.282,283
Inaddition,severalfoodborneoutbreaksofdiarrheacaused by EAEChave been reported inEurope, Japan, Mexico and India.231,232,284–286Oneofthemaffected2697schoolchildren
inJapan,afterconsumptionofschoollunches.232
SeveralstudieshaveimplicatedEAECasthepredominant agentofpersistentdiarrheainchildren.287–289EAEC-mediated
persistent diarrhea has been linked to malnutrition and decreaseinphysicalandintellectualdevelopmentinseveral studiesfromBrazil.274,288,290Notably,asymptomaticpatients
infectedwithEAECalsoexhibitgrowthretardation.274Since
its definition as a pathotype, high rates of asymptomatic young children carrying EAEC have been reported in sev-eralstudies,involvingsubjectswithlowsocioeconomicstatus in developing countries.214 The persistence of EAEC may
inducechronicintestinalinflammation,evenintheabsence of diarrhea, reducing its absorptive function and leading to malnutrition.274,291 Growth impairment has also been
observedinamousemodelofEAECoralinfection.292
Consid-ering the high number of asymptomatic EAEC-colonized children in low-income countries, this pathotype has an importantimpactonpublichealthasonecauseofimpaired physicalandcognitivedevelopment.
EAECistransmittedbythefecal-oralroutebyfoodor con-taminatedwater.232,285,286EAECweredetectedinmilksamples
from infantfeeding bottles that were handled by mothers with low socioeconomic status.293 Also, viable EAEC were