K
BULLETIN OF THE SERBIAN GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY
2006.
LXXXVI -
. 1
YEARE 2006.
TOME LXXXVi – N 1
UDC 572(497.11)
Ђ
.
.
*O
*
: , 1.439,
, . ,
90- XX , ,
ђ ,
XIX ,
-, . ,
( , ,
-.), ,
, ,
.
: , , , ,
Abstract: Settlements in South Eastern Serbia (1439 in total) were anthropogeographically researched in past, mostly few decades ago. Some newer studies of settlements and origins of population, since the beginning of 90s until present, mostly have been treating the issues of particular settlements. Cvijic’s anthropogeographic
conception, established in the early phase of development of scientific geography in Serbia at the end of 19th
century, has been prevailing in the research of villages. In the research of urban settlements, modern complex geographical approach has been prevailing, neglecting the anthropogeographical attributes. The necessity of scientifically funded anthropogeographic knowledge on settlements, in this as well as in other areas of Serbia, is evident, both in science and in different fields of social practice. This knowledge would be based on traditional achievements of Serbian anthropogeographic school, as well as on contemporary achievements in the area of investigations of settlements.
Key words: settlement, population, South Eastern Serbia, anthropography, researches
,
,
,
XIX
XX
,
.
:
–
ђ
(
);
–
,
(
–
–
–
–
–
.),
,
,
-,
ђ
* Ђ
. , , , 3/III, .
. , , , 3/III, .
*
146010
–
(
)
90-
XX
,
,
ђ
.
80-
XX
,
,
”
”
.
,
,
(13.721 km
2),
(
., 1979),
-
:
(
),
,
,
,
(2002)
1.046730
,
14%
(1991.
–
1.090730
14,4%), 1.439
,
23,4%
,
27
(
).
†,
,
,
:
,
-
,
-,
,
,
.
,
-,
-
1. - 23 30 76 38 16 47 9 180 47 58 33 29 19 53 65 24 111898. 1899. 1902. 1903. 1905–1909. 1912.
1940. 1941. 1940. 1941. 1948, 1949, 1950. 1951. 1951, 1952, 1953. 1955.
1948. 1950. 1858, 1959, 1960. 1962.
1952–1956. -‡ 1963. 1964.
- - - 2001. 2002.
1903. 1904. 1912. 1913. 1948. 1951. 1954. 1963. 1964. 1964. 1970. 1972. 1973.
1974. 1975. 1977. 1978. 1979. 1981. 1982.
2003.
:
и
(
. ., 1903),
и
и
и
(
. ., 1904),
и
и
и
(
. ., 1912),
(
џ
., 1913),
и
(
. ., 1948),
-
Ц
(
. ., 1951),
и и
(
., 1954),
и
† 1948, 1953, 1961, 1971, 1981, 1991. 2002, , .
9, , , 2004.
‡ – , ,
, , ,
(
. ., 1963),
и
(
. ., 1964),
и
и
(
. ., 1964),
и
(
., 1970),
(
. ., 1972. 1973),
и
и
и
и
(
. ., 1974),
(
. ., 1975. 1977),
-и
и
(
. ., 1978. 1979)
Ј
и
(
. .,
1981. 1982)
и
и
(
., 2003).
:
758
,
12,3%
.
.
,
-.
,
и
и
Ј
.
-1878.
,
,
,
-,
,
,
,
ђ
,
,
.
23
,
§–
(
),
(
)
.
.
ђ
-,
:
–
,
,
,
;
–
-,
:
,
,
;
–
XVII
XVIII
,
,
-,
–
(
,
.)
1878.
(
. ., 1903).
и
и
(
-)
(
),
.
1902. 1903.
-,
:
,
-
-,
.
30
,
**,
21
,
–
,
(
,
)
.
:
–
”
” (
-)
;
–
,
-,
XVIII
XIX
,
-,
,
,
-
,
”
”,
;
–
-,
§ , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , .
** , , , , , , , , ,
( ), , , , , , , , ,
, , , ђ , ( ђ ), ,
–
,
-ђ
(1878),
1912.
(
. ., 1904).
и
и
-
-,
(
),
††(
).
-
-,
,
.
,
,
,
ђ
,
.
:
–
;
–
76
,
‡‡,
,
-,
,
;
–
”
-”,
(
,
.),
.
(1987)
–
ђ
–
,
ђ
-ђ
. (
. ., 1912).
. .
.
,
,
,
32
(
,
-,
,
,
,
,
-,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
-,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
).
,
(
ъ
., 1918).
и
,
-,
,
-
.
38
-,
(
),
,
–
,
.
§§,
-.
,
,
.
,
:
†† , ,
.
‡‡ , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , ,
-, , , , , , , , , ,
-, , , ' , , , , , ,
, , , ђ , , , ( ), , ,
, , , , , , , ( ), ,
-, , , , , , , (
-), ( ), , , , , ,
.
§§ , , , , , , , , ,
-, , , , ( ), , , , ,
-, , , , , ( ), , , ,
, , ( ), , , Ђ , , ,
–
,
;
–
,
,
,
-,
;
–
,
1878.
,
,
(
-џ
)
(
,
,
,
-,
,
.)
–
,
.
,
,
–
(
џ
., 1913).
и
,
–
,
,
ђ
,
16
,
***–
,
.
.
ђ
,
:
–
(
,
,
.)
-;
–
(80,1%)
;
–
,
-,
(
);
–
(
)
(
,
.)
–
(
. ., 1948).
-Ц
,
1940.
1941.
,
-
,
,
-,
,
.
47
,
:
(25
)
(22
),
23
,
†††:
(
),
(
)
(
-).
,
,
:
–
:
,
,
,
-,
I
(
);
–
:
,
XVII
XVIII
,
1878.
,
–
,
,
-џ
,
,
,
,
,
-,
XVIII XIX
(
. ., 1951).
*** , ( ), , , , ,
-, , , , , , , .
††† , ( ), , , , ( ),
, , , , , , , , ,
и и
,
,
,
.
,
,
ђ
,
‡‡‡,
:
.
:
–
;
–
(42,4%)
(8,5%)
(50,9%)
–
(49,1%)
ђ
(24%
),
(24%)
(6,9%),
(6,9%),
–
,
,
,
. (
., 1954).
и
180
.
:
(33
),
§§§(94
),
****(31
)
††††(22
).
‡‡‡‡,
,
11
(
-,
,
,
Ђ
,
,
,
,
,
-,
),
(
,
,
,
,
,
).
,
:
–
;
–
XVI
XVII
,
-
;
–
XVIII XIX
,
ђ
1878.
,
,
1912.
;
‡‡‡ , , , , , , (
).
§§§ , , , , , , (
-), , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , ,
-, , , , , .
**** ( ), , ( ), ,
, , , , ( ), , ,
, ( ), ( ),
( ), , , ( ),
( ), ( ), (
-), , , , ( ), Ђ (
), , , ( ), , , ,
-, , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , ( ),
, , , , , , , ,
, , , ( ), , , , ,
, , , , , , ,
( ), , , , ( ).
†††† , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , ,
-, , , , ( ), ђ, ,
-, , ђ, .
‡‡‡‡ , , , , , , ђ , , ,
-, , , , , , ђ, , ,
–
XVIII
(”
”),
–
–
,
,
,
,
. (
. ., 1963).
e
и
,
,
54
,
,
-,
,
47
,
§§§§–
,
,
,
.
:
–
(
),
,
(
XVIII
),
”
”
;
–
;
–
–
ђ
(
. ., 1964).
и
и
-,
(
).
,
:
(19
)
*****(39
),
†††††–
,
-.
,
-,
,
.
,
:
–
-
,
(
)
:
,
);
–
(3%);
–
,
52%;
–
(
,
)
–
XVIII XIX
,
,
1878.
(
. ., 1964).
и
33
,
‡‡‡‡‡–
,
.
.
§§§§
, , , , , , , , ,
-, , , ( ), , ,
-, , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , Ђ ,
( ), , ,
, , , , , , , (
-), ( ), (
-).
***** ( ), , , , , , , ,
, , , , ( ), ,
-, , , .
††††† , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , ,
( ), , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , (
-), .
‡‡‡‡‡ , , , , , , , , ,
--
,
.
-:
–
(38,1%),
(
,
,
);
–
(59,5%)
XVIII
XIX
–
ђ
–
,
,
,
,
. (
., 1970).
.
,
-,
.
ђ
,
29
,
§§§§§–
,
-,
.
-,
:
–
-,
-
,
XV (
),
XVII
XVIII
(
-
);
–
,
–
XVIII XIX
”
”,
–
,
-ђ
1877.
(
. ., 1972. 1973).
и
и
и
и
ђ
-.
-, 19
:
******,
††††††–
,
-.
:
–
XVIII
XIX
,
-
(”
”),
-;
–
,
(
)
(
)
–
ђ
1878.
(
”
”),
,
(
. ., 1974).
,
-,
–
, , , , , , , ,
-, , , .
§§§§§ , , , , , (
-), , , ( ), , , ,
( ), , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , .
****** , , , , , , , ,
( ), ( ).
,
53
,
‡‡‡‡‡‡,
-,
–
,
Ђ
,
.
-:
–
(4,1%)
,
,
-;
–
9,03:90,97%;
–
,
58,9%
,
(19,5%)
–
XVIII
XIX
a
,
,
(
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
.),
-,
,
ђ
1878.
,
(
. ., 1975. 1977).
и
и
-,
ђ
,
,
,
,
,
.
65
,
§§§§§§.
:
–
,
”
”
(30%)
;
–
-,
”
”, ”
”, ”
”
.
–
–
,
,
. (
. ., 1978. 1979).
Ј
и
,
-,
,
,
,
.
24
*******.
:
–
,
, ”
”,
;
–
:
,
‡‡‡‡‡‡ , , , , , , ( ),
, , , , , , , ,
, , , Ђ ( ), Ђ ђ , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , ,
( ), , , , , , , , ,
, , , – ( ), , , , ,
.
§§§§§§ , , , , , , , ,
-, , , , , ,
, , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , ђ, ,
, , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , .
******* , , , , ( ), ,
, , , , , , ђ ђ ,
, , , , , , , , (
–
-,
(
,
.),
,
ђ
,
:
1883–1887.
(
,
),
,
,
,
1906–1912.
(
,
.),
,
(
. ., 1981. 1982).
и
и
2001.
2002.
(
., 2003)
11
†††††††14
(
).
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡-,
ђ
,
,
,
-,
.
,
,
”
”,
,
2002.
-
-.
,
90-
XX
,
,
-
.
§§§§§§§,
,
.
,
1998.
,
ђ
(27
1.412
)
(
Ђ
. .
, 2001. 2002).
-:
–
,
;
–
-,
–
,
,
:
-,
ђ
,
(
,
Ђ ђ
,
††††††† , ( ), , , , , , , ,
.
‡‡‡‡‡‡‡ , , , , , , , , ,
-, , , .
§§§§§§§ 1990. , џ (1995),
(1996), (1996), (1997),
(1997), (1997), (1997), (1998),
(1998), (1999), (2000),
(2001), (2001), (2002),
(2003), (2003), ђ
,
,
),
,
.
ъ . (1918): ю , ъ, .
. . (1972. 1973): , ,
( ) , , . XII XIII, , .
. . (1975. 1977): , ,
( ) , , . XV XVII, , .
. . (1978. 1979): , -
-, ( ) , , . XVIII XIX,
-, .
. . (1981. 1982): , - ,
, , . XXI XXII, , .
. (1954): , , , . LXVII,
, .
. (1970): , - , ”
-”, , . 33, .
. (2003):
-, , , ,
. . (1903): , ,
, . II, , .
. . (1904): , , ,
, . III, , .
. . (1912): , , , .
XVIII, , .
Ђ. . (2001. 2002): , . I, II, III IV,
, ” ” ” ”, .
. . (1948): , , . 1, –
-, - , .
. . (1951): - , , . 33,
, .
. . (1963): , , . 2, , .
. . (1964): , , . 38,
-, .
. . (1964): , ,
, . 13, .
. . (1974): , , . XIV,
, .
. (1979): , ,
, . 49, .
џ . (1913): , , . 2, .
. (1987): , , . 2, ,
SRBOLJUB Đ. STAMENKOVIĆ
DRAGICA R. GATARIĆ
S u m m a r y
ABOUT ANTHROPOGEOGRAPHIC RESEARCHES OF SETTLEMENTS IN SOUTH EASTERN SERBIA
In this article we have embraced time, volume, spatial distribution and relevant results of
anthropogeographic researches of settlements in South Eastern Serbia (13,721 km2), inside the territory enclosed by
the former boundaries, now including five administrative regions of the Republic of Serbia: Nišava (excluding the
municipality of Ražanj), Toplica, Pirot, Jablanica and Pčinj region, in which 1,046,730 inhabitants (in 2002), or
14% of total population of central Serbia and Vojvodina (in 1991 – 1,090,730 inhabitants or 14,4%), in 1,439 settlements, or 23,4% of total number of settlements in Serbia, of which 27 are the urban settlements (according to the legal criteria), realize their biological and economical existences.
From the mentioned facts on anthropogeographic researches of settlements of some areas in South Eastern Serbia, the following important notes could be derived:
- settlements in this area of the Republic of Serbia have the continuity in anthropogeographic researches that lasts few decades, with expressed temporal discontinuity in investigations of some parts of the territory;
- results of anthropogeographic researches of settlements are antiquated, few decades old, and only partially reliable conclusions on anthropogeographic image of South Eastern Serbia can be derived from them, and
- requirement for new scientific knowledge (with the anthropogeographic character) on settlements in South Eastern Serbia is evident – the settlements in this area have experienced many contemporary phenomena and processes: disturbance of former ethnic balance caused by emigration of Serbian population from numerous
settlements in municipalities of Preševo, Bujanovac and Medveđa, expressed spontaneous demographic empting of
many villages (Gara near Preševo, Đorđevac near Bujanovac, Koritnik near Niška Banja, Vukojevac, Rastelina and
Tačevac near Kuršumlija), presence of Serbian refugees from Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo and
