Hist. cienc. saudeManguinhos vol.20 número2

(1)

Isilda Teixeira Rodrigues

Professor of the Department of Education and Psychology/ Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro and of the Center for Studies of History and the Philosophy of Science/Universidade de Évora.

Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro Apartado 1013

5000-801 – Vila Real – Portugal [email protected]

Carlos Fiolhais

Professor of the Department of Physics and of the Center for Computational Physics/Universidade de Coimbra.

Rua Larga 3004-516 – Coimbra – Portugal

[email protected]

Medical teaching at the

Universidade de Coimbra

in the sixteenth century

Received for publication in March 2012. Approved for publication in September 2012.

Translated by Diane Grosklaus Whitty.

RODRIGUES, Isilda Teixeira; FIOLHAIS, Carlos. Medical teaching at the Universidade de Coimbra in the sixteenth century. História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro. Disponível em http://www.scielo.br/ hcsm.

Abstract

The article addresses the teaching of medicine at the Universidade de Coimbra in the sixteenth century, framing it within the Portuguese and European context and highlighting the contributions of the institution’s key professors – Enrique de Cuellar, Tomás Veiga, Alfonso de Guevara, and João Bravo Chamisso – along with their main works. Following a historical overview, the study analyzes the reforms of Dom Manuel I and Dom João III, the role of anatomy in the renewal of medical studies, the relation with the Discoveries, the obstacles raised by the Inquisition, medical practice at hospitals, and, lastly, the decline of medical teaching. Although they did not teach at Coimbra, reference is made to the two greatest names in sixteenth-century Portuguese medicine: Amato Lusitano and Garcia da Orta.

(2)

Isilda Teixeira Rodrigues, Carlos Fiolhais

B

ased on a review of the key literature, this article presents an overview of the evolution of medical teaching at the University of Coimbra during the sixteenth century. We highlight the leading figures who played a role in this teaching and single out their major works, many of which are available in digital format (see bibliography), mostly through the University of Coimbra’s Alma Mater – Biblioteca Digital de Fundo Antigo.

To better understand the circumstances of the Portuguese university and especially of the teaching of medicine during this century, we begin by situating the institution within the political, socioeconomic, and religious context of the era.

In the early sixteenth century, the only Portuguese university was located not in Coimbra but in Lisbon. The capital of the kingdom was already a busy, cosmopolitan city by then. It had become an important trade center, where the ambitious sought fame and fortune above all. Lisbon was a city of sharp contrasts, where people lived amidst wealth and poverty, extravagance and debauchery, and where the native born mingled with foreigners from all corners of Europe and the world, in some cases having come to replace those who had left in the frenzy of the Discoveries (Mea, 2002; Azevedo, 1984). Portuguese expansion, initiated the previous century, had reached its apex when Vasco da Gama landed in India in 1498 and Pedro Álvares Cabral in Brazil in 1500.

The origin of the era of the Discoveries was not linked to scientific or teaching activities at the University of Lisbon but rather to the desire to expand trade and spread religion. Only gradually did the Discoveriescome tocontribute to the modernization of university teaching. Moreover, in their heyday, the Discoveries relied more on empirical developments acquired through practice than scientific knowledge taught at a school (the “school of Sagres” being no more than a myth).

In contrast with the vitality and vivacity of daily life in Portugal, the country’s university was experiencing a period of distinct dormancy in the early sixteenth century. Founded in Lisbon in 1290 by King Dom Dinis, the university was only definitively moved to Coimbra in 1537 – after two previous temporary transfers there – by order of Dom João III (who reigned from 1521 to 1557). In contrast with the intense student life in Lisbon, where they could spend their time at parties and in gambling establishments, paying little heed to compliance with the rules laid out in the school’s statutes (Polónia, 1995), in Coimbra the students’ day-to-day routine was duller and was also packed with university activities. Besides regular processions through the streets, attended by all members of the Academy, bugles would sound throughout the town on the eve of academic exams so everyone would be duly advised of the ceremony to come (Ramalho, 1982).

Medical teaching in Portugal before the sixteenth century

(3)

a body of knowledge or by discipline (Ferreira, 1990). Under the reign of Dom Sancho I (from 1185 to 1221), some monks from the monastery were sent to study theology in Paris, home to a university since 1170. One of these monks, Mendo Dias – whose biography is cloaked in darkness – also studied medicine and later taught it at Santa Cruz; today he is recognized as the first Portuguese professor of medicine (his effigy is sculpted above the western entrance to the Coimbra Faculty of Medicine [Faculdade de Medicina de Coimbra], a project of the Estado Novo). Another major name in medieval Portuguese medicine was Pedro Julião Rebelo, better known as Pedro Hispano (1215?-1277). Born in Lisbon, he studied or served as a physician in Lisbon (at São Vicente de Fora), Paris (according to some, at Montpellier), and Sienna (Costa, 2010). He was also pope for a short time (1276-1277), under the name John XXI (the only Portuguese pope, he too is represented on the same entrance of the Coimbra Faculty of Medicine). Of the various works attributed to him (the authorship of the majority being uncertain), the most notable is “Liber de oculo” (Hispano, n.d.; Smith, Cardoso, 2008), an ophthalmological treatise presenting a prescription said to have been used by the Italian Renaissance painter Michelangelo, and Thesaurus pauperum, a book that includes information on contraception (Hispano, 1576; Cruz Pontes, 1972; Pereira, 1973). However, it was only after Dom Dinis ordered the foundation of the Portuguese university, on March 1, 1290, that Portugal saw the introduction of properly organized medical studies (Costa, 1986; Albuquerque, 1984). From the beginning, the arts, canon law, civil law, and medicine were taught. From then until the Renaissance, there is no record of any major changes in the methodology of medical teaching.

The first university on the Iberian Peninsula was the University of Salamanca, established in 1218. Owing to its proximity to the University of Coimbra and to its prestige as well, it drew many Portuguese students at the height of its renown, mainly those who lived closer to this Spanish city. After the 1496 edict by Dom Manuel I that forced Jews to either convert or leave the country, the steady drain of young Jewish talent (Lemos, 1991) first to Spain and then to the rest of Europe eventually, if not immediately, left an atmosphere of intellectual suffocation that hindered a level of academic development commensurate with the scholarly advances typical of the early Renaissance. The situation was exacerbated by the 1536 inauguration of the Inquisition under the reign of Dom João III (Pinho, 1997; Ramos, 1997; Leitão, 1986). It became increasingly difficult for Portuguese Jews to remain in the country.

The reform under Dom Manuel I

(4)

the described circumstances, this failed to result in any substantial improvement in the training of physicians. Despite the well-meaning royal intervention, the state of university teaching thus remained weakened (Ferreira, 1990). The statutes enacted by Dom Manuel I – the third since the university had been created – provide interesting insights into the king’s absolute power over the fate of higher education in Portugal. The university had been created under the official seal of royal power, and the monarch continued to wield authority there. One fine example of the restrictions on university autonomy is Dom Manuel I’s 1499 request to the teaching body that a vacant chair in medicine be given to his physicist general, Afonso Madeira (physicist was the term then used for physicians, just as physics was the term for medicine); his will was done.

In the statutes handed down by Dom Manuel I in 1503, medicine offered two chairs in that specialty (the second had been introduced by King Dom João II in 1493 to complement the main chair) and one in natural philosophy. A bachelor’s degree in medicine was obtained by attending medical classes for five years, with the prerequisite of first earning a diploma in the arts. Before receiving his license to practice (licenciatura), the candidate had to present theses and arguments regarding points found in the doctrines of the Greek Galen and the Persian Avicenna, who formed the cornerstones of medieval medicine. Before the title of ‘doctor’ was bestowed, the graduate presented a brief lesson and short argument. The teaching system was rudimentary, as each chair served five courses simultaneously, with students from diverse courses listening at the same time to the same lessons read by the masters, thereby hampering their needed specialization (Lemos, 1991). There was no order or methodical distribution of disciplines, unlike today. All university students basically followed the same path, although they started out from different points and had different goals.

The reform under Dom João III

Things only changed in 1527, when King Dom João III, who succeeded Dom Manuel I, visited Coimbra and was pleasantly surprised to find the study of the arts and languages flourishing at the Santa Cruz monastery under the direction of Friar Brás de Braga. Whether it was for this motive or to distance scholars from the lively life in the capital, the truth of the matter is that one decade later, in 1537, the monarch definitively transferred the university from Lisbon to Coimbra and also implemented a reform of the university institution (Dias, 1969). The course in medicine witnessed its first real reformulation since the introduction of university studies to Portugal. The number of medical chairs was increased and the distribution of subjects that were taught was tailored more to the goals of the course and the pedagogical experiences at the day’s top European centers.

(5)

a day under the reforms introduced by Dom João II and Dom Manuel I, medical teaching moved to cover four lessons under the reform implemented by Dom João III. The names of these classes corresponded to the time of day when they were taught. Two catedrilhas – or “minor chairs” – were also established; these were deemed of lesser import and therefore no set lesson time was defined. The first of the four main chairs, known as the prima, was held at six in the morning and the second, or noa, at three in the afternoon; both were based essentially on Galen. The third, or véspera, which was held at six in the evening, addressed the aphorisms of Hippocrates. The last, known as the terça, took place at nine at night and was based on the books of Avicenna. The unscheduled minor chairs in crises and method explored the works of Galen too (Ricou, 1991; Ferreira, 1990; Dias, 1969).

Since classes were basically theoretical and drawn directly from the classic authors, their texts were read in translation from Greek and Arabic; their Portuguese versions had undergone several centuries of revisions and were thus at quite a remove from the cultural context in which they had been written. Students were expected to capture the text literally and then repeat and defend it in academic meetings or discussions. It would be up to the students to perpetuate the transmission of this knowledge, so that medical tradition would prevail over any attempt at innovation.

The modifications stipulated in Dom João III’s reform were implemented gradually over the course of two decades; classes were added when an appropriate instructor was found. Due to the scarcity of duly trained Portuguese professors, it was sometimes necessary to bring in foreign instructors (Leitão, 1986; Dias, 1969). In 1537, the Spaniard Enrique de Cuellar (1480-1544), who had studied medicine at the Université de Paris, became the first foreigner appointed teacher of the prima chair in Coimbra, a position normally assigned to the school’s most qualified physician (Ricou, 1991). However, only six students were at his inaugural class, given on June 4 of that year at the Casa do Reitor (Home of the President), evincing the low level of university attendance at that time. Cuellar taught the chair until the end of his life, which was not long, since he passed away just seven years after his appointment. He left a book of commentaries on Hippocrates’ Prognostics, published in Coimbra – Ad libros tres predictionum Hippocrates – which illustrated the heightened influence of the medical teachings of this classic Greek scholar during the era (Cuellar, 1543) (Figure 1). It was through the presence of Cuellar and other teachers from abroad, along with some Portuguese physicians, who were progressively more knowledgeable and specialized, that the Portuguese Faculty of Medicine slowly joined the general movement of renewal that we associate with the Renaissance. Oddly enough, from 1538 through 1544 medical classes were taught at the Santa Cruz monastery, where medical teaching had medieval traditions, as noted earlier (Rodrigues, 2005).

(6)

(7)

highly regarded professor, as we can ascertain in countless excerpts of works later published by his disciples. For example, in a paper on medical deontology entitled Retrato del perfecto medico (Portrait of the perfect physician), published in Salamanca (Henriques, 1595) and written by another Jewish doctor, Henrique Jorge Henriques (1545?-1622), born in Guarda, Veiga is described as “admirable, and a perfect Physician, such as it has not been found since the Gentiles unto the present day.” The university’s Compêndio histórico, published in 1771, prior to Pombal’s reforms, portrayed him as displaying “a subtle genius and rare erudition” (Junta..., 1771, 2008) and transcribed the words of the influential Portuguese physician Zacuto Lusitano (1557-1642), who received his training at the universities of Salamanca, Coimbra, and Sigüenza (Guadalajara) and was forced into exile in Amsterdam, who called Veiga “doutor eminentíssimo”. Throughout his career, Veiga always conjoined his practice as a doctor with his work as a university professor. He left many writings behind, mostly commentaries on Galen, such as Opera omnia in Galeni libros edita et commentariis in partes novem distintis, published posthumously in Lyon (Veiga, 1587); his great respect and admiration for the classic authors is patent, most especially for Galen (Figure 2). Veiga complemented this classic component with the innovative mark of the Renaissance, citing a number of physicians who were his contemporaries, like Andreas Vesalius (1514-1564) – the Belgian doctor who founded modern anatomy with his book De humani corporis fabrica, published in Basel (Vesálio, 1543) – and Jean François Fernel (1497-1558), the French physician who introduced the terms physiology and pathology and author as well of Universa medicina, published in Lyon (Fernel, 1567; Rodrigues, 2005). Both books can still be found at the University of Coimbra’s Biblioteca Joanina, although the second of them is only available in its 1581 edition.

The role of autonomy

The medical course underwent further refinement in 1556, again by order of Dom João III, with the introduction of the chair of anatomy; it followed the terça lesson and was taught by Alfonso Rodriguez de Guevara (?-1587). Spanish like Cuellar, Guevara earned his medical degree at the University of Sigüenza and then pursued further studies in Bologna, Italy, at Europe’s oldest university. Before going to Portugal, he taught anatomy at Valladolid, where there was a medieval university founded in the thirteenth century, like Coimbra (Grande, 1986).

(8)

(9)

Reginae medici physici, in pluribus ex ejs quibus Galenus impugnatur ab Andrea Vesálio Bruxelensi in constructione et usu partium corporis humani defensio (Guevara, 1559) (Figure 3). In this book, the author fiercely defends Galen and contests the opinions of Vesalius – who is referenced in the title – regarding anatomy and human physiology (Ferreira, 1990; Carvalho, 1915). One of the most gripping questions for sixteenth-century physicians was which side should be bled in cases of pleurisy. In this book, Guevara referred not only to the works of Vesalius but also to those of Amato Lusitano on the valves of the azygos veinand the ‘insufflation’ of veins. Swayed by the more conservative ideas of the school of Paris, Guevara failed to understand the innovative content of Vesalius’ work, which had the ultimate effect of significantly compromising the spread of this pioneering author’s ideas in Portugal. The book’s drawings do not portray human anatomy but rather a quadrumonous on an anatomical table. Guevara also makes mention of only two dissections, neither performed at the University of Coimbra. Another important step in the development of medical studies in Portugal was the 1557 establishment of a chair in surgery, linked to the anatomy class, both of which were taught by Guevara. However, the university did not reap full benefits from the existence of the two chairs since Guevara was quite lax in fulfilling his schedule at Coimbra. His teaching was affected by frequent absences, due to constant trips to Lisbon and some to Spain as well. Still, when he was actually in Coimbra, Guevara managed to train a solid group of fine collaborators. It was one of these Portuguese disciples, João Bravo Chamisso (?-1636), who succeeded him as instructor of the chairs of anatomy and surgery. Chamisso, who was born in Serpa, was the author of De medendis corporis malis per manualem operationem, published in Coimbra (Chamisso, 1605); in it, he cites Vesalius and mentions an anatomical theater, most likely located at Coimbra’s Hospital da Conceição (Figure 4). In 1561, Guevara moved permanently from Coimbra to Lisbon to serve as physician to Dona Catarina, widow of Dom João III, and to work as professor of anatomy at the Hospital Real de Todos os Santos in Rossio, which was the most prominent Portuguese center for the study of anatomy and surgery in the sixteenth century (the building was destroyed in the great earthquake of 1755). Guevara was doctor to Dom Sebastião as well, whom he accompanied into the Battle of Alcácer Quibir1_, and likewise of Cardinal Dom Henrique. He was eventually accused of taking advantage of the generous welcome he had received in Portugal, since he decided to start wholeheartedly serving the interests of Philip II of Spain, who was named Philip I of Portugal following the 1580 unification of the two Iberian crowns (Ferreira, 1990; Carvalho, 1915).

The introduction of the chairs in anatomy and surgery concluded the reform of the Faculty of Medicine initiated when Dom João III transferred the university from Lisbon to Coimbra.

(10)

(11)

(12)

from that of Italian universities. As at European universities in general, the ties between medicine and the arts were strong in Portugal. However, to judge from the royal regulations of 1559, we can infer that the Portuguese university was closer to the Nordic model, where a complete education in the area of the arts was a prerequisite to the complete study of medicine. In contrast, the arts and medicine had been studied in conjunction from the very beginning in Italy. The arts curriculum in Coimbra was based chiefly on Aristotle’s’ logic and natural philosophy, with less emphasis placed on astronomy and mathematics. Students were required to attain a solid mastery of Latin and to undergo intense training in formal discussion or debate. So it is no surprise that sixteenth-century medical writers reflected a brand of medical education heavily influenced by the arts and philosophy. The ties between philosophy and medicine do indeed have deep historical roots and can be detected in various ways in all the major authorities in medicine, including the Greeks Hippocrates, Aristotle, and Galen and the Persian Avicenna and the Arabian-Spanish Averroes, who continued the Hellenic tradition (Ferreira, 1990; Lemos, 1991).

(13)

data, information on agriculture and astrology, and even a section on astrological medicine (Rodrigues, 2005; Rasteiro, 2000).

The Discoveries

The role that physicians played in the Discoveries deserves at least brief mention. The preeminence of Pedro Nunes, for example, cannot be ignored (Fiolhais, Martins, 2010). This ‘cosmographer-in-chief of the Kingdom’, who made valuable contributions to world science and especially the art of navigation, had trained as a doctor although he only rarely practiced the profession. One of the era’s most famous physicians was his friend and colleague Garcia da Orta (1501?-1568), who, like Pedro Nunes, came from a family of new Christians. But Orta did not follow Nunes on his move to Coimbra, as the former had set sail for India in 1534, where he passed away. In Goa, he published Colóquios dos simples, e drogas he cousas medicinais da Índia in Portuguese (Orta, 1563; 1983), in which he refers to Vesalius (Rodrigues, 2005; Rasteiro, 1999). Thirty years later, the book was translated into Latin (Orta, 1593) and thus gained a world audience (Figure 5). It is interesting to note that the Coimbra library holds the Latin translation but not the original, published at the ends of the Empire.

In relation to Brazil, a noteworthy letter was sent to Lisbon in 1500 by a certain Master João, who was probably João Faras, physician and surgeon to Dom Manuel I. Master João, a scientifically qualified member of Pedro Álvares Cabral’s armada, tried to ascertain the geographic position of Brazil and made a drawing of the constellation of the Southern Cross (Johnson, Silva, 1992). As these voyages became more frequent and the Portuguese moved progressively farther into Brazilian lands, physicians began rendering medical care on board caravels and also to settlers. For example, physicians and surgeons came to Brazil

(14)

on several expeditions, especially the major one led by Martim Afonso de Souza in 1530, and helped with the growth of trading posts. In 1553 the Portuguese Crown appointed a physician to Brazil, Jorge Fernandes, who was accompanied by a master surgeon. There they were to find people relying on indigenous medicine (Johnson, Silva, 1992).

The Inquisition

The introduction of the Inquisition to Portugal squelched the flourishing of Portuguese medicine in the sixteenth century. In the Spanish Indexes from this period, a third of censored scientific books were on medicine, for a total of 250, and the same was true in Portugal. Jewish physicians were hardest hit. For one thing, they were doctors and thus members of a profession that was under strict surveillance. For another, they were Jewish, or new Christians, and therefore likewise the target of rejection or at least of serious mistrust for religious reasons. Driven by the Inquisition, the persecution of new Christians or of those with whom they had contact spawned an atmosphere of distrust that could only hamper the discussion of new ideas and knowledge (Rodrigues, 2005). In 1564, Cardinal Dom Henrique, Inquisitor-General (Inquisidor-Mor) and then at the front of the government of Dom Sebastião,banned students of Jewish origin from the University of Coimbra’s São Pedro College (Colégio de São Pedro). The early seventeenth century was a time of intense persecution of Jews by the Inquisition in Lisbon, Évora, Coimbra – where it reached extreme methods, including autos de fé conducted in front of the Santa Cruz monastery, as well as the persecution of physicians, like João Bravo – and even stretching its tentacles to Goa, where Garcia da Orta was the victim of an auto de fé post-mortem. It is thus no surprise that in 1534, the same year that Garcia da Orta left the country, another great Portuguese physician of Jewish origin fled as well: Amato Lusitano (1511-1568), the famous author of Index dioscoridis, published in Antwerp (Amato, 1558) (Figure 6), and also of Curationium centuriae septem (Amato, 1620, 1980) or Centúrias, which was released as a complete set of volumes for the first time in Lyon in 1580 (Amato, 1980; Orta, 1563, 1593). Lusitano took up residence first in Antwerp, Belgium; then in Ferrara, Ancona, and Pesaro, Italy; and next in Dubrovnik, in present-day Croatia, forced into a peripatetic life that ended in Thessaloniki, in what is now Greece. In Ferrara in 1547, based on dissections performed in collaboration with the Italian João Baptista Canano, Amato recognized ‘ostioles’ or ‘operculs’, that is, valves of the azygos vein, but in his anatomy book Guevara stated that he “had not found the mentioned valves in the conditions described by Amato” (Guevara was wrong) (Rodrigues, 2005, p.100). Amato’s name can be found on lists of banned books in 1581. A total of 32 copies of his Centúrias appear among the books at Portuguese inquisitional trials (Rodrigues, 2005). The fate of a life in exile was likewise to befall Zacuto Lusitano nearly one century later, in 1625; he left Lisbon first for Spain and then for Amsterdam, Holland (Rodrigues, 2005; Pinto, 2002; Catz, 1994; Tavares, 1982).

Medical teaching in Portuguese hospitals

(15)

(16)

earlier, university instructors were transferred to hospital institutions. At least brief mention should be made of Lisbon’s Hospital de Todos os Santos, cited earlier, as well as the singular case of the Portuguese charity institutions known as misericórdias, which sprang up all over the country and in overseas territories.2

The Hospital de Todos os Santos, founded by Dom João II in 1492 (its first statutes date to 1504), was a grand establishment, deemed one of the best in Europe by Spanish physician Ruy Díaz d’Isla (1493-1542?), who worked at the hospital and was known for his research on syphilis (Isla, 1539). In addition to its general infirmaries, the hospital had a church, a unit for the demented, and surgery units, where dissections were performed in hopes of clearing up doubts about a variety of diseases; it had special infirmaries as well (one for women and another for syphilis sufferers). It had an ambulatory service, a shelter for foundlings, and a pensioners unit too. Since this hospital was in Lisbon and the number of anatomical dissections performed in Coimbra was almost zero, some professors, like Guevara, moved to Lisbon, where they did valuable work in their area (Bellini, 2007; Pina, 1939). The hospital had the services of a physicist and a surgeon, and medical students visited patients there – in other words, it was the main surgery school in the kingdom. Founded in Coimbra before 1508 (the date of its statutes) in a building located in what is now called Praça Velha, the Hospital da Conceição (also known as the Hospital Novo and as the Hospital Real de dom Manuel) can be considered a small facility compared to the Hospital de Todos os Santos, although the former did have a physician and a surgeon and was visited by university students. Medical teaching had thus incorporated mandatory practice at hospitals as a component by this time.

The supply of doctors, however, fell far short of the needs of the kingdom’s hospital network. Calculations are that at the close of the fifteenth century there were some 411 hospitals in Portugal, averaging roughly one for every four thousand inhabitants. Lisbon then had 61, plus five asylums (albergarias), eight mercearias3_{, and five leprosariums (gafarias).} Many trade guilds, like that of tailors, had their own private hospitals. People who had no access to physicists or surgeons relied on apothecaries, barbers, bleeders, and healers (Lemos, 1991; Mesquita, 1983).

(17)

Final considerations

In summary, the foundation was laid for the development of medical teaching in Portugal thanks chiefly to successive university reforms – vitally enhanced by the excellence of professors, sourced mainly from Spain – and to the establishment of the Hospital de Todos os Santos. On the other hand, the expulsion of the Jews in 1496 and the introduction of the Inquisition in 1536 were the two factors that had greatest impact on the late fifteenth-century decline of medical teaching (Brandão, 1969, p.931-961). This downward trend intensified in 1555, when Dom João III, suspecting heresy and under pressure from the queen and infantes, removed leadership of the College of Arts (Colégio das Artes) from its instructors who, being from Bordeaux, had for some years implemented teaching practices that were marked by humanism. The next step would be to hand the school over to the Jesuits (Brandão, 1933), who, in addition to occupying the College of Arts, had created the College of Jesus in 1542. Although the Jesuits have been accused of having a hand in the stagnation of medical teaching in Portugal (Spence, 1984; Findlen, 1990), we see various reasons for calling this notion into question. First of all, the Society of Jesus, created in Paris in 1534 by Saint Ignatius of Loyola, was a robust order that expanded quickly and vigorously in Europe and around the world. Second, countless members of the brotherhood were engaged in intense medical research in South America at that time. Third, the Society stretched its missionary work to such far corners as China, where no other religious order had previously obtained permission to enter; moreover, the Chinese granted this authorization in part because of the Jesuits’ reputation as master alchemists. Lastly, it was major naturalists from the Society of Jesus, like Athanasius Kircher, who developed such innovative techniques as microscopy and the camera obscura in the seventeenth century. Indeed, it is hard to justify how such a young, active, and educated intellectual group would stand as an obstacle to teaching. The Jesuits actually dominated teaching in Portugal as of the later sixteenth century and promoted Aristotelian philosophy through their methods and teachings. This trend became entrenched with the publication of “Os conimbricenses” (Conimbricenses, 1592), a set of commentaries on Aristotle, released in Coimbra between the turn of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. To help them achieve this, the Jesuits enjoyed the protection and financing of the king. In the first years of their hegemony, with their well-equipped schools and well-qualified teachers, the Jesuits fostered substantial development of university studies, and for these advances they deserve credit. However, their teaching was focused almost solely on the arts. During a time of great change and innovation, this approach had the adverse effect of leaving Portuguese universities impervious to the new physical and mathematical theses then revolutionizing the world of science in Europe (Fonseca, 1997; Barreto, 1983; 1986).

(18)

best centers in terms of quality. In 1592, Francisco Tomás, doctor at the Hospital de Todos os Santos and surgeon-general, stated in a letter to a Madrid bishop that “the science of medicine has been totally lost in Portugal, and is almost irrecoverable, for neither are there teachers at the university nor can there be good disciples” (Compêndio..., 1772, p.311). In Europe, medicine continued down the road to progress while Portugal would only see better days with the 1772 reform of the University of Coimbra under order of the Marquis of Pombal. This reform brought changes to the Faculty of Medicine, including construction on the premises of the College of Jesus both of an anatomical theater and of a hospital, which took over the services provided by the Hospital da Conceição. A pharmaceutical dispensary was also built. Preparatory studies in mathematics and natural philosophy were modernized, with the introduction of two new schools.

REFERENCES

ABREU, Laurinda.

O papel das misericórdias dos “lugares de além-mar” na formação do império português.

História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, v.8, n.3, p.591-611. 2001.

ALBUQUERQUE, Luís.

Science et humanisme dans la renaissance portugaise. In: Colloque International d’Etudes Humanistes, 21., 1978, Paris. Atas... Paris: Fondation Calouste Gulbenkian. p.419-435. 1984.

AMATO LUSITANO.

Centúrias de curas medicinais. Trad. Firmino Crespo. Lisboa: Universidade Nova de Lisboa. 1980.

AMATO LUSITANO.

Curationum medicinalium centuriae septem... quibus praemissa est commentatio de introitu medici ad aegrotantem, deque crisi & diebus decretorijs.

Bordéus: Gilberti Vernoy. Disponível em: http:// babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=ucm.5327378028. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2012. 1620.

NOTES

1_{King Dom Sebastião went missing in this battle, which cost the Portuguese kingdom its independence and} led to the unification of the two crowns.

2_{On the role of the}_{misericórdias}_{overseas, see Abreu, 2001.}

3_{Derived from the Portuguese term}_mercê_(mercy),_mercearia_{is no longer used in the sense employed in} the text. According to the Houaiss and Villar (2001) dictionary, it refers to a place that gives shelter to the homeless or to those in need of special care. In exchange for shelter, the residents had to fulfill certain spiritual obligations, such as praying for someone’s health, commending a soul to God, and so on.

AMATO LUSITANO.

In dioscoridis anazarbei de medica materia libros quinque, Amati Lusitani doctoris medici ac philosophi celeberrimi enarrationes eruditissimae. Accesserunt huic operi praeter correctiones Lemmatum, etiam adnotationes R. Constantini, necnon simplicium picturae ex Leonharto Fuchsio, Jacobo Dalechampio. Lyon: Theobaldum Paganum. Disponível em: http://almamater. uc.pt/wrapper.asp?t=In+Dioscoridis+Anazarbe i+De+medica+materia+libros+quinque%2C+A mati+Lusitani+doctoris+medici+ac+philosoph i+celeberrimi+ennarationes+eruditissimae.+Ac cesserunt+huic+operi+praeter+correctiones+L emmatum%2C+etiam+adnotationes+R.+Cons tantini%2C+necnon+Simplicium+picturae+ex +Leonharto+Fuchsio%2C+Jacopo+Dalechamp io%2C+atque+aliis&d=http%3A%2F%2Fbdig ital.sib.uc.pt%2Fmanuscritos%2FUCBG-R-40-15%2FglobalItems.html. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2012. 1558.

AZEVEDO, José Silva.

A sociedade portuguesa na época dos descobri-mentos. História, Lisboa, v.63, p.28-47. 1984. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

(19)

BARRETO, Luís Filipe.

Caminhos do saber no renascimento português: estudos de história e teoria da cultura. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional. 1986.

BARRETO, Luís Filipe.

Descobrimentos e renascimento: formas de ser e pensar nos séculos XV e XVI. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional. 1983.

BELLINI, Lígia.

Culturas de ofício e práticas de cura na Lisboa moderna. História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro,v.14, n.2, p.613-617. 2007. BRANDÃO, Mário.

A inquisição e os professores do Colégio das Artes. Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra. (série Acta Universitatis Conimbrigensis). 1969.

BRANDÃO, Mário.

A Universidade de Coimbra: esboço da sua história. Coimbra: Atlântida, por ordem da Universidade. 1933.

CARVALHO, Joaquim de.

A anatomia em Coimbra no século XVI. Revista da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, v.4, p.213-235. 1915.

CATZ, Boris.

Os judeus portugueses entre os descobrimentos e a diáspora. Lisboa: Associação Portuguesa de Estudos Judaicos. p.105-151. 1994.

CHAMISSO, João Bravo.

De medendis corporis malis per manualem operationem. Coimbra: Typis Emmanuelis de Araujo. Disponível em: http://almamater.uc.pt/ wrapper.sp?t=Ioannis+Bravo+Chamisso+...+De+ medendis+corporis+malis+per+manualem+ope rationem+%3A+Tomus+primus&d=http%3A%2 F%2Fbdigital.sib.uc.pt%2Fbg1%2FUCBG-R-12-1%2FUCBG-R-12-1_item1%2Findex.html. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2012. 1605.

COMPÊNDIO...

Compêndio histórico do estado da Universidade de Coimbra: no tempo da invasão dos denominados Jesuítas…. Lisboa: Régia officina Typográfica. Disponível em: http://books.google.pt/books? id=Uao4AAAAMAAJ&pg=PA272&lpg=PA272& dq=ap.+compendio+hist%C3%B3rico&source =bl&ots=wwtfpXwMXC&sig=K0QlWA1YAyWy 48EfdtvxLE2K0dY&hl=pt-PT&sa=X&ei=KUOK UeKKAqmg7AbstoDwCA&sqi=2&ved=0CFEQ6 AEwBg#v=onepage&q=ap.%20compendio%20 hist%C3%B3rico&f=false. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2012. 1772.

CONIMBRICENSES.

Comentarii Collegii Conimbricencis Societatis Iesu. Coimbra: Typis et expensis Antonij à Mariz. Disponível em: http://almamater.uc.pt/wrapper.

asp?t=Commentarii+Collegii+Conimbricensis+So cietatis+Jesu+in+octo+libros+Physicorum+Aristot elis+Stagiritae.Curso+Conimbricense&d=http%3 A%2F%2Fbdigital.sib.uc.pt%2Fbg6%2FUCBG-2-8-13-10%2FglobalItems.html. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2012. 1592.

COSTA, Jaime Celestino.

O estudo da medicina até ao fim do século XIX. In:Academia de Ciências de Lisboa. História e desenvolvimento da ciência em Portugal. Lisboa: Publicações do II Centenário da Academia de Ciências de Lisboa. v.1, p.498-508. 1986. COSTA, Manuel Freitas e.

Personalidades e grandes vultos da medicina portuguesa através dos séculos. Lisboa: Lidel. 2010. CRUZ PONTES, José Maria da.

A obra filosófica de Pedro Hispano Portucalense. Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra. 1972. CUELLAR, Enrique de.

Ad libros tres predictionum Hippocrates. Cõmento Etiã Gal. Aposito et Exposito, Coimbra: Iohã[n] nis Aluari & Iohã[n]nis Barrerij. Disponível em: http://almamater.uc.pt/wrapper.asp?t=Opus+in signe+ad+libros+tres+predictionum+Hippocrat is.Commento+etiam+Galeni.Anotationes+eiusd em+sup[er]+primo+libro+que+interlege[n]dum +occurrere+..&d=http%3A%2F%2Fbdigital.sib. uc.pt%2Fbg6%2FUCBG-R-21-16%2FglobalItems. html. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2012. 1543.

DIAS, José Sebastião.

A política cultural da época de D. João III. Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra; Instituto de Estudos Filosóficos. 1969.

FERNEL, Jean.

Universa medicina. Lyon: Apud Andrea

Wechelum. Disponível em: http://books.google. pt/books?id=3uZQAAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcov er&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0v=onepage &q&f=false. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2012. 1567. FERREIRA, Francisco António Gonçalves.

História da saúde e dos serviços de saúde em Portugal. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian. 1990. FINDLEN, Paula.

Jokes of nature and jokes of knowledge: the playfulness of scientific discourse in early modern Europe. Renaissance Quarterly, Chicago, v.43, n.2, p.292-331. 1990.

FIOLHAIS, Carlos; MARTINS, Décio.

Breve história da ciência em Portugal. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade; Gradiva. 2010. FONSECA, Fernando Taveira.

A medicina. In: Universidade de Coimbra.

(20)

GRANDE, Nuno.

Os estudos anatómicos em Portugal até ao fim do século XIX. In: Academia de Ciências de Lisboa. História e desenvolvimento da ciência em Portugal. Lisboa: Publicações do II Centenário da Academia de Ciências de Lisboa. v.1, p.479-495. 1986.

GUEVARA, Alfonso Rodriguez de.

Galenus impugnatur ab Andrea Vesálio Bruxelensi in constructione et usu partium corporis humani defensio. Coimbra: Apud Ioan. Barrerium. Disponível em: http://almamater.uc.pt/wrapper. asp?t=In+pluribus+ex+iis+quibus+Galenus+imp ugnatur+ab+Andrea+Vesalio+Bruxelensi+in+co nstructione+et+usu+partium+corporis+humani %2C+defensio&d=http%3A%2F%2Fbdigital.sib. uc.pt%2Fbg6%2FUCBG-R-12-8%2FglobalItems. html. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2012. 1559.

HENRIQUES, Henrique Jorge.

Retrato del perfecto medico. Salamanca: Luan y Andres Renaut. Disponível em: http:// alfama.sim.ucm.es/dioscorides/consulta_libro. asp?ref=X533265966&idioma=0. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2012. 1595.

HISPANO, Pedro.

Liber oculorum.Mss. Cod. Monac.; lat. 40. (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek München). s.d. HISPANO, Pedro.

Thesaurus pauperum, regímen sanitatis.

Frankfurt: Apud bared. Chr. Egen. Disponível em: http://dfg-viewer.de/show/?set[mets]=h ttp%3A%2F%2Fdaten.digitale-sammlungen. de%2F~db%2Fmets%2Fbsb00038822_mets.xml. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2012.1576.

HOUAISS, Antônio; VILLAR, Mauro de Salles. Dicionário Houaiss da língua portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva. 2001.

ISLA, Ruy Díaz de.

Tractado llamado fructo de todos los [s]anctos contra el mal serpentino, venido de la ysla Española. Sevilha: Andres de Burgos. Disponível em: http:// alfama.sim.ucm.es/dioscorides/consulta_libro. asp?ref=X533676370&idioma=0. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2012. 1539.

JOHNSON, Harold; SILVA, Maria Beatriz Nizza da Silva (Coord.).

O império luso-brasileiro, 1500-1620. Lisboa: Estampa. 1992.

JUNTA...

Junta de Providência Literária. Compêndio historico do estado da Universidade de Coimbra no tempo da invasão dos denominados jesuitas e dos estragos feitos nas sciencias e nos professores, e directores que a regiam pelas maquinações, e publicações dos novos estatutos por elles fabricados. Apres. Manuel Ferreira Patrício. Porto: Campo

das Letras. Disponível em: http://www.fc.up.pt/ fa/index.php?p=nav&f=books.0235.0. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2012. 2008.

JUNTA...

Junta de Providência Literária. Compêndio historico do estado da Universidade de Coimbra no tempo da invasão dos denominados jesuitas e dos estragos feitos nas sciencias e nos professores, e directores que a regiam pelas maquinações, e publicações dos novos estatutos por elles fabricados. Lisboa: Regia Officina Typografica. 1771. LEITÃO, José.

História da medicina em Portugal desde a Idade Média ao princípio do século XX. In: Academia de Ciências de Lisboa. História e desenvolvimento da ciência em Portugal. Lisboa: Publicações do II Centenário da Academia de Ciências de Lisboa. p.455-477. 1986.

LEMOS, Maximiano.

História da medicina em Portugal: Doutrinas e instituições. 2v. Lisboa: Dom Quixote; Ordem dos Médicos. 1.ed., 1899. 1991.

LI, Andrés de; FERNANDES, Valentim.

Reportório dos tempos em lingoagem portugues com as estrellas dos signos. Lisboa: Valentim Fernandes. Disponível em: http://purl.pt/22941. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2012. 1518.

LOPES, Maria Antónia.

Breve história das misericórdias portuguesas. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra. 2008.

MEA, Elvira Azevedo.

A resistência sefardita ao Santo Ofício no período filipino. Caderno de Estudos Sefarditas, Lisboa, n.2, p.47-58. 2002.

MENESES, Maria Rúber.

Os autores ibéricos quinhentistas na história da medicina tropical. Porto: Universidade do Porto. 1971.

MESQUITA, José Carlos.

O ensino universitário antes das reformas pombalinas. História, Lisboa, v.52, p.71-84. 1983. ORTA, Garcia de.

Coloquios dos simples e drogas he cousas mediçinais da India e assidalgûas Erutas achadas nella onde se tratam algûas cousas tocantes a medicina, pratica e òutras cousas boas, pera saber. Edição fac-similar. Introd. Nuno Sampaio. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional; Casa da Moeda. Disponível em: http:// purl.pt/22937/2/. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2012. 1983. ORTA, Garcia de.

Aromatum, et simplicium aliquot medicamentorum apud Indos nascentium historia... annotatiunculis illustrata à Carolo Clusio... Quarta editio.

(21)

bdigital.sib.uc.pt/bg5/UCBG-RB-33-13/UCBG-RB-33-13_item1/index.html. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2012. 1593.

ORTA, Garcia de.

Coloquios dos simples e drogas he cousas mediçinais da India e assidalgûas Erutas achadas nella onde se tratam algûas cousas tocantes a medicina, pratica e òutras cousas boas, pera saber. Goa: Ioannes de Endem. 1563.

PAIVA, José Pedro.

Portugaliae monumenta misericordiarum. Lisboa: União das Misericórdias Portuguesas. (v.4, Crescimento e consolidação: de D. João III a 1580). 2005.

PAIVA, José Pedro.

Portugaliae monumenta misericordiarum. Lisboa: União das Misericórdias Portuguesas. (v.3, A fundação das misericórdias: o reinado de D. Manuel I). 2004.

PAIVA, José Pedro.

Portugaliae monumenta misericordiarum. Lisboa: União das Misericórdias Portuguesas. (v.2, Antes da fundação das misericórdias). 2003.

PEREIRA, Maria Helena Rocha.

Obras médicas de Pedro Hispano. Coimbra: Por ordem da Universidade. p.73-301. Disponível em: http://books.google.pt/ books?id=zcv7wJMXZ-EC&printsec=frontcove r&dq=obras+medicas+pedro+hispano&source= bl&ots=8jp_iSvFNT&sig=orprD3T6MwjmGVA_ ogxSylLRjro&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ZPo_UKeG GeLomAWY2YCIBg&redir_esc=yv=one page&q=obras%20medicas%20pedro%20 hispano&f=false. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2012. 1973. PINA, Luís.

História geral da medicina. Porto: Simões Lopes. v.1. 1939.

PINA, Luís.

A medicina portuguesa de além mar no século XVI. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora. 1935.

PINHO, Sebastião Tavares.

A mobilidade dos universitários. In: Universidade de Coimbra. História da universidade em Portugal.

Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra; Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian. v.1, t.2, p.991-1014. 1997. PINTO, Paulo.

Os sefarditas portugueses e a ciência do Renascimento. Cadernos de Estudos Sefarditas, Lisboa, n.2, p.141-153. 2002.

POLÓNIA, Amélia.

Reflexão sobre alguns aspectos da vida quotidiana no século XVI. Porto: Universidade do Porto; Faculdade de Letras. 1995.

RAMALHO, Américo da Costa.

Alguns aspectos da vida universitária em Coimbra no século XVI (1548-1554). Coimbra: Faculdade de Letras; Instituto de Estudos Clássicos. 1982. RAMOS, Luís de Oliveira.

Universidade de Coimbra. In: Universidade de Coimbra. História da universidade em Portugal. Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra; Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian. v.1, t.2, p.361-393. 1997. RASTEIRO, Alfredo.

Medicina judaica lusitana: século XVI. Coimbra: Quarteto. 2000.

RASTEIRO, Alfredo.

O ensino médico em Coimbra: 1131-2000. Coimbra: Minerva. 1999.

RICOU, Eduardo.

A medicina portuguesa na época do renascimento. Jornal do Médico, Porto, v.130, n.2386, p.1-10. 1991.

RODRIGUES, Isilda.

Amato Lusitano e as problemáticas sexuais: algumas contribuições para uma nova perspetiva de análise das Centúrias de Curas Medicinais. Tese (Doutorado) – Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real. Disponível em: http:// repositorio.utad.pt/bitstream/10348/17/1/phd_ itrodrigues.pdf. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2012. 2005. SERRANO, José António.

O ensino da anatomia na Escola Médico-Cirúrgica de Lisboa. Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra. 1892.

SMITH, A. Mark; CARDOSO, Arnaldo Pinto.

O tratado dos olhos de Pedro Hispano. Lisboa: Aletheia; Franco Maria Ricci; Fundação Champalimaud. 2008.

SPENCE, Jonathan.

The memory palace of Matteo Ricci. New York: Elisabeth Sifton Books; Viking Penguin. 1984. TAVARES, Maria José Pimenta Ferro.

Os judeus em Portugal no século XV. Tese (Doutorado) – Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa. 1982.

VEIGA, Tomás Rodrigues da.

Opera omnia in Galeni libros edita et commentariis in partes novem distintis. Lyon: Apude Petrum Landry. Disponível em: http://gallica. bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k53739p/f4.image. r=tomas+rodrigues+veiga.langEN. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2012. 1587.

VESÁLIO, André.

(22)

lii+Bruxellensis%2C+Scholae+Medicorum+Pata vinae+Professoris%2C+De+humani+corporis+f abrica+libri+septem]&d=http%3A%2F%2Fbdigi tal.sib.uc.pt%2Fmanuscritos%2FUCBG-4A-21-14-1%2FglobalItems.html. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2012. 1543.

uuuUUU

ZACUTO, Abraão.