h ttp : / / w w w . b j m i c r o b i o l . c o m . b r /
Bacterial,
Fungal
and
Virus
Molecular
Biology
Biocontrol
potential
of
saline-
or
alkaline-tolerant
Trichoderma
asperellum
mutants
against
three
pathogenic
fungi
under
saline
or
alkaline
stress
conditions
Ruiting
Guo,
Zhiying
Wang,
Ying
Huang,
Haijuan
Fan,
Zhihua
Liu
∗NortheastForestryUniversity,SchoolofForestry,Harbin,China
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received24September2017 Accepted14February2018 Availableonline13April2018 AssociateEditor:VâniaMelo
Keywords:
Biocontrol
Trichodermaasperellum
Mutantlibrary Salinityandalkalinity Fungaldisease
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Salinityandalkalinityare majorabioticstressesthatlimitgrowthanddevelopmentof poplar.Weinvestigatedbiocontrolpotentialofsaline-andalkaline-tolerant mutantsof
TrichodermaasperellumtomediatetheeffectsofsalinityoralkalinitystressesonPopulus
david-iana×P.albavar.pyramidalis(PdPappoplar)seedlings.AT-DNAinsertionmutantlibraryof
T.asperellumwasconstructedusinganAgrobacteriumtumefaciensmediatedtransformation
system;thisprocessyieldedsixtyfivepositivetransformants(T1–T65).Thesalinitytolerant mutant,T59,grewinPotatoDextroseAgar(PDA)containingupto10%(1709.40mM)NaCl. UnderNaCl-richconditions,T59wasmosteffectiveininhibitingAlternariaalternata(52.00%). Thealkalinitytolerantmutants,T3andT5,grewinPDAcontainingupto0.4%(47.62mM) NaHCO3.TheabilityoftheT3andT5mutantstoinhibitFusariumoxysporumdeclinedas
NaHCO3concentrationsincreased.NaHCO3toleranceofthePdPapseedlingsimproved
fol-lowingtreatmentwiththesporesoftheWT,T3,andT5strains.Thesalinitytolerantmutant (T59)andtwoalkalinitytolerantmutants(T3andT5)generatedinthisstudycanbeapplied todecreasetheincidenceofpathogenicfungiinfectionundersalineoralkalinestress.
©2018SociedadeBrasileiradeMicrobiologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisis anopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Introduction
Trichoderma sp. is an important biocontrol agent against
pathogenicfungi.1 However,growthand physiologicalstate
ofTrichodermasp.isaffectedbybothbioticandabioticstress
factorsinthenaturalenvironment.Forexample,salinityand alkalinityare majorabioticstressesthatlimitinggrowth of
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:[email protected](Z.Liu).
Trichoderma.2,3Thus,weconstructedaTrichodermasp.mutant
librarytoobtainsaline-oralkaline-tolerantmutantsandthen tested their effectiveness as antifungal agents under both salineandalkalineconditions.
Most existing Trichoderma mutant libraries have been focused on cellulases in efforts to generate commercially applicable cellulolyticstrains. For example,Trichoderma ree-sei mutantsMCG77(ATCC56764)andQM9414(ATCC26921) produce more cellulase than the parent strain.4 T. reesei mutant NG-14 hasincreasedfilter paper-degrading activity (five times higher) and specific activity (two times higher)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2018.02.008
1517-8382/©2018SociedadeBrasileiradeMicrobiologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC BY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
comparedwithT. reeseimutantQM9414.5 Trichoderma viride mutantstrainQM9123secretestwiceasmuchcellulaseasthe parentstrain.6T.viridemutantT100-14hasbetterconversion ofcellobiosetoglucosethan theparentstrain.7 Trichoderma
atroviridemutantTUBF-1505andT.citrinoviridemutantEB-104
bothproduce higherlevels of cellulases than their respec-tiveparent strains.8,9 There are a few previous studies on biocontrol ofTrichoderma inregards to isonitrile antibiotic, cyanidehydratase,Cdresistance,andsalinitytolerance.10–13 OneexampleisthataT.harzianummutantcanexcrete isoni-trileantibiotic.11 TrichodermakoningiimutantT21hashigher cyanidehydrataseactivitythanthewildtype.13Tenof200T.
koningiimutantshavehigherCdtoleranceand canbeused
toremediateCd-contaminatedsoils.14FourTrichoderma iso-lateshave been identified asstablemutants. Two ofthese are salt-tolerant mutants (Th50M6 and Th50M11), both of whicharesignificantlymoreeffectivethanthewildtypestrain atinhibitingFusariumoxysporumandimprovingtheyieldof tomatoplantsundersalineconditions.3Seedlingsraisedfrom salinitytolerantTrichodermaisolateshadhigherlevelsoftotal phenols and superoxide dismutaseactivity. Saline tolerant
Trichodermamutantscaneffectivelyreducethephysiological
damagecausedbysaltstress10,15;however,therearefew stud-iesregardingT.asperellumoralkanitytolerantmutants.
Poplarisamodelorganismfortheapplicationofgenetic engineering to forestry. Furthermore, poplar species are widelyusedforwoodproductioninshort-rotationforestry,16 andarecultivatedworldwide.17 Popularisalsousedto elu-cidatethephysiologicalandmolecularmechanismsofstress toleranceinTrees.18Therearemanystressors,suchassalinity andalkalinity,thatcancausedamagetopoplarsanddecrease theirproductivity.19Trichodermatreatmentshavebeenshown toalleviateNaCl stress(70, 150and240mMNaCl) and sig-nificantlyincreasethelengthandfreshweightoftheshoot androot, numberofleaves,leafarea,and chlorophyll con-tentcomparedwiththecontrol.20TrichodermaasperellumQ1 canenhancecucumbergrowthbyinducingphysiological pro-tectionundersalinitystress.21Itispossiblethat salinityor alkalinitytolerantT.asperellummutantscanimprovethe resis-tanceofpoplarseedlingstosalineoralkalinestressors.
In this study, a T-DNA insertional mutant library of
T. asperellum was constructed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens
mediated transformation system (ATMT). Some salinity or alkalinity tolerant mutants of T. asperellum were obtained. Then,the biocontrolpotentialofthe mutantstrainsunder NaClorNaHCO3stresswastested.And,thefunctionof alle-viatingsaline or alkalinestress to the poplar seedlings of themutantstrainsunderNaClorNaHCO3stresswastested. Ourresultsprovidetheoreticalsupportandapractical refer-enceforthedevelopmentofTrichodermastrainsforalleviating saline or alkaline stress and managing fungal diseases in salineoralkalinesoils.
Materials
and
methods
Strains,plantmaterialsandprimers
T.asperellumACCC30536wasobtainedfrom theAgricultural
Culture Collection of China. Alternaria alternata CFCC82114
(poplarleafwither),RhizoctoniasolaniCFCC86328,andF. oxyspo-rumCFCC86068wereobtainedfromtheChinaForestryCulture Collection Center.A.tumefaciens AGL-1,which contains the binary vector pBHt22 and a hygromycin B-resistance gene (hph),wasprovidedbyProf.FucongZheng(SouthChina Uni-versityofTropicalAgriculture,China).
Populus davidiana×P. alba var. pyramidalis Louche (PdPap
poplar) seedlings were cultured aseptically for 15din Liq-uid RootingMedium(MS mediumwithNAA0.25mg/L and Sucrose20g/L)orDifferentialMedium(MSmediumwithNAA 0.05mg/L,6-BA 0.5mg/L, Sucrose20g/L, and Agar8g/L) at 25◦C23,24;theyallhadsimilarheights(about5cm)anda sim-ilarnumberofleaves(6–8leaves).24
TheprimersHph-L(5-GAAACCGACGCCCCAGCACT-3)and Hph-R (5-AGTGCTGGGGCGTCGGTTTC-3) were designed to detect the hygromycin B-resistance gene (hph) using the Primer6.0software(PREMIERBiosoft,USA)andsynthesized bySangonBiotech(Shanghai,China)Co.,Ltd.
ConstructionoftheT-DNAinsertionalmutantlibraryfor T.asperellumandanalysisofthemutantsgeneticstability
T. asperellum was transformed using the ATMT method.24
200Mof35-Dimethoxy-4-HydroxyAcetophenone(AS)was addedtotheinducedandco-cultivated(pH5.0)media,and theconcentrationofT.asperellumwas106spores/mL.25,26
Todeterminemitoticstability,80putative transformants were selectedrandomly,culturedfiveconsecutive timeson PotatoDextroseAgar(PDA)withouthygromycinB,and trans-ferredtoPDAcontaining300g/mLhygromycinB.24
ThehphgenewasassayedusingPCRintheputative trans-formantswhichhadmitoticstability.Thesenseprimerwas Hph-L (5-GAAACCGACGCCCCAGCACT-3)and theantisense primerwasHph-R(5-AGTGCTGGGGCGTCGGTTTC-3).25 GrowthconditionsoftheWTandmutantstrainsinPDA withdifferingconcentrationsofNaClorNaHCO3
TheWTandmutantstrainswereculturedat28◦Cfor5din PDA.Myceliumdiscs(5mmdiameter)wereobtainedfromthe edgesofthePDAplateswithaholepunch,inoculatedintonew PDA,andculturedat28◦Cfor5d.Finally,myceliumdiscsof 5mmdiameterwereobtainedfromtheedgesofPDAplates, inoculatedintothePDAwithdifferentconcentrationsofNaCl or NaHCO3, and culturedat28◦Cfor3–5d. The concentra-tionsofNaClwere2,4,6,8,and10%,andtheconcentrations ofNaHCO3were0.1,0.2,0.3,and0.4%.Thecolonydiameters wererecordedeverydayduringculturing.Theexperimentwas completelyrandomizedwiththreereplicates.
ThebiocontrolpotentialoftheWTandmutantstrainsin PDAwithdifferentconcentrationsofNaClorNaHCO3
TheWTand mutantstrainswerechallengedwiththe phy-topathogensA.alternata,R.solani,andF.oxysporum.PDAwith differentconcentrationsofNaClorNaHCO3wereusedinthe challenge experiments, and PDA was used ascontrol. The concentrationsofNaClwere2,4,6,8,and10%,andthe concen-trationsofNaHCO3were0.1,0.2,0.3,and0.4%.Symmetrical positionsweremarkedontheplates.Myceliumdiscs(5mm
diameter)wereobtainedfromthesamepartofthePDAplates, inoculatedontonewPDAonthesymmetricalpositions,and culturedat28◦Cfor5–10d.Theexperimentwascompletely randomizedwiththreereplicates.IR=(DC−DE)/(DC)×100%, where:“IR”istheabbreviationofinhibitionrate;“DC”is abbre-viation of the diameter ofthe control group, and; “DE” is abbreviationofthediameteroftheexperimentgroup.27 TheNaClorNaHCO3toleranceofthePdPapseedlings
co-culturedwiththeWT,T3,andT5strains
ThePdPapseedlingswereco-culturedwithsporesoftheWT, T3,andT5strainsunderNaCl(1and2%)andNaHCO3(0.05,0.1 and0.2%)stress.Thecellconcentrationswere106spores/mL. LeavesfromthePdPapseedlingswereassayedforSOD,CAT, and POD afterco-culturing for0, 1, 3, 5, 7,and 15dusing commerciallyavailablekits(NanjingJiancheng Bioengineer-ingInstitute).
Results
TheT-DNAinsertionalmutantlibraryofT.asperellum andthegeneticstabilityoftheputativetransformants ThetransformationefficiencyofATMTisabout60mutantsper 106spores.Toinvestigatethemitoticstabilityoftheintegrated T-DNA,eightyputativetransformantswiththevectorpBHt1 weretransferredrepeatedlytoPDA.Afterfiveroundsofgrowth onPDA,myceliumdiscsweretransferredtoselectivePDAwith 300g/mLhygromycinB.Alltransformantsthatgrewunder theseconditionshadhighmitoticstability.
Sixtyfivepositivetransformantswereobtained.PCR detec-tion of the target gene was performed on the 80 selected putative transformants. Presence of the hph gene in the hygromycinBresistantcolonieswasconfirmedwiththe Hph-LandHph-Rprimers.The1005bpPCRproductwasfoundinall 65putativetransformants;thissuggeststhatthehphgenewas successfullyintegratedintotheT.asperellumgenome(Fig.1). GrowthconditionsoftheWTandmutantstrains,aswell astheirbiocontrolpotential,underdifferentNaCl concentrations
GrowthoftheWTstraincanbepromoted by2%NaCl dur-ingtheearlystagesofgrowth.However,inthelaterstagesof growth,thiseffectgraduallydecreasesandthendisappears. Thegrowth oftheWTstrainwascompletelyinhibitedata NaClconcentrationof10%(Fig.2).
ThemutantstrainswerescreenedforNaCltoleranceusing PDA with 10% NaCl. Of the 65 mutant strains, only one (T59)grewonPDAwith10%NaCl(Fig.2).AlthoughtheT59 mutantgrewquicklyunderdifferentNaClconcentrations,the myceliumgrowthconditiondidnotchange;however,its abil-ity toproducespores wasinhibitedunderNaCl stress.The NaCltoleranceoftheT59strainwashigherthanthatofthe WTstrain.
On day threeof culture,the T59 strain was exposed to thepathogenicfungi.Onthefifthofculture,theT59mutant totallycoveredallthreefungalphytopathogenfungi(Fig.2). TheT59strainhadthehighestinhibitionrate(52.00%)against
Alternariaalternataunder10%NaClconditions.Meanwhile,the
WTstraingrewslowlyunderNaClstresses.TheT59strainhad abetterbiocontrolpotentialthantheWTunderNaClstress.
GrowthconditionsoftheWTandmutantstrains,aswell astheirbiocontrolpotential,underdifferent
concentrationsofNaHCO3
In later stages of growth, the inhibition of the WT strain wasweakerunder0.05,0.1,and0.2%NaHCO3concentrations; thus, under theseconditions NaHCO3 does notinhibit the growth ofthe WTstrain.ThegrowthoftheWTstrainwas completelyinhibitedunder0.4%NaHCO3.
After3dculturingtheT3andT5mutantsgrewonthePDA with0.4%NaHCO3.ThegrowthoftheT5mutantwasfaster thanthatoftheT3mutant(Fig.3).TheNaHCO3tolerancesof theT3andT5mutantsarehigherthanthatoftheWTstrain. TheT5mutantwasexposedtoR.solani,andafter4dtheT5 mutantinhibitedthegrowthofR.solaniunder0.1%NaHCO3 conditions.TheT5mutantissensitivetohigherNaHCO3 lev-els;however,R.solaniexhibitedsimilargrowthunder0.2,0.3, and0.4%NaHCO3,whichwashigherthanunder0.1%NaHCO3. TheT5mutantwasexposedtoR.solaniafter6dofexposure toboth0.2%and0.3%NaHCO3,andexposedtoR.solaniafter 7dofexposureto0.4%NaHCO3.However,theT5mutantdid notcompletelyinhibitR.solaniat0.4%NaHCO3after10dof exposure(Fig.4AandD).
TheT5mutantinhibited A.alternataafter5dofgrowth; however,after10dofgrowththemutantdidnotcompletely inhibit A. alternata at 0.1% NaHCO3. At0.2% NaHCO3, the growthofA.alternatawasslowerthanatotherNaHCO3 con-centrations.TheT5mutantinhibitedA.alternataafter6dof growth;however,after10dofgrowththeT5mutantdidnot coveredinhibitA.alternata.At0.3%NaHCO3,theT5mutant inhibitedA.alternataafter5dofgrowth;however,after10dof growththeT5mutantdidnotcompletelyinhibitA.alternata.
1005bp 100bp 250bp 750bp 1000bp 2000bp 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 500bp 20
Fig.1–PCRdetectionofthehphgeneinassumedtransformants.TheHphgenewasamplifiedwiththeHph-LandHph-R primers.Partialagargelelectrophoresis.Lanes1–18:18putativetransformants;lane19:wild-typeT.asperellum;lane20: DL2000DNAmarker(TaKaRaCo.).
6% NaCl
8% NaCl
e
f
g
4% NaCl
10% NaCl
a
b
c
d
Fig.2–BiocontrolpotentialoftheT59mutantunderNaClstressafter6d:thegrowthoftheWTandT59strainsinPDA(A andC);thegrowthoftheWTandT59strainsinPDAwith10%NaCl(BandD),and;confrontationoftheT59mutantwith
Alternariaalternata,Fusariumoxysporum,orRhizoctoniasolaniunderdifferentNaClconcentrations(E–G).
a
d
g
b
c
f
e
Fig.3–GrowthoftheWTandmutantstrainsunderNaHCO3stressafter4d:theWT,T3,andT5strainsinPDA(A–C);the
WT,T3,andT5strainsinPDAwith0.4%NaHCO3(D–F),and;challengeoftheT3strainwiththeT5straininPDAwith0.4%
NaHCO3(G).
d
a
0.2%NaHCO3 0.1%NaHCO3 0.3%NaHCO3 0.4%NaHCO3b
c
e
f
Fig.4–ConfrontationoftheT5mutantwithR.solani,F.oxysporum,orA.alternataafter10d:challengeoftheT5mutant withR.solani,F.oxysporum,orA.alternataunderdifferentNaHCO3stresses(A–C,thereverseside);challengeoftheT5
At0.4%NaHCO3,theT5mutantdidnotcompletelyinhibitA.
alternataafter7dor10dofgrowth(Fig.4BandE).
TheT5mutantinhibitedF.oxysporumafter5dofgrowth; however,itdidnotcompletelyinhibitF.oxysporumafter10dof growthat0.1%NaHCO3.ThegrowthofF.oxysporumincreased withNaHCO3concentrationsinthePDA.Itturnsoutthatthe growthofF. oxysporumispromoted byNaHCO3 andthe T5 mutantwasunabletoinhibitF.oxysporumat0.2,0.3,or0.4% NaHCO3(Fig.4CandF).
TheT3mutanthad similar abilitiestoinhibit the three pathogenic fungiunder different NaHCO3 levels. However, sincethegrowth oftheT3mutantwasslower thanthatof theT5mutantunderhigherNaHCO3conditions,theabilityof theT3mutanttoinhibitA.alternataat0.3%and0.4%NaHCO3 waslowerthanthatoftheT5mutant(Fig.5).
GrowthofPdPapseedlingsunderNaClorNaHCO3stress
ThePdPapseedlingswitheredinMSwith1or2%NaCl (espe-cially2%NaCl),andtheseedlingsdiedafter4d.Inthelater stagesofculture,theinhibitionofthepathogenicfungiwas weakerunderNaClstress.
At0.05%NaHCO3,theleaves,stems,androotsofthePdPap seedlingsdidnotchangeafter15dofculture.At0.1%NaHCO3, therootsbegantobrownafter15dculture.At0.2%NaHCO3, therootswerebrownafter3dofculture,buttheleavesand stemswerenormal.At0.3%NaHCO3,therootswerebrown after2dofculture,andtheleavesandthestemswere with-ered.
NaClandNaHCO3toleranceofPdPapseedlingstreated
withtheWT,T59,T3,orT5spores
After2dofco-culture,thesporesoftheWTandT59strains germinatedunderNaClstressandgatheredaroundtheroots of the PdPap seedlings. The NaCl tolerance of the PdPap seedlingsdidnotchange,butthePdPapseedlingswithered. Thus,the NaCltoleranceofthe PdPapseedlings cannotbe improvedbytreatmentwithWTorT59spores.
Intheearlystageofculture,thePdPapseedlingswere seri-ouslydamagedat0.3%NaHCO3;however,followingtreatment withWT,T3,orT5spores,theroots,leaves,andstemswere normalafter2d.After5dofculture,theleavesandthestems inthegroupstreatedwithsporeswere inbetterconditions thanthoseinthegroupsnottreatedwithspores.Thus,the toleranceofthePdPapseedlingstoNaHCO3canbeenhanced byWT,T3,orT5spores.
EnzymaticactivityofthePdPapseedlingstreatedwith WT,T3,orT5sporesunderNaHCO3conditions
At0.05% NaHCO3, the SOD,CAT,and POD activitiesin the control group increased, decreased, and slightly increased, respectively,comparedtothecontrol.TheSODandCAT activi-tiesofthePdPapseedlingstreatedwithWT,T3,andT5spores wasmaintainedduring3–7doftreatment.TheSODactivity wasincreasedaftertreatment,andthenremainedconstant (Fig.6C).TheWT,T3,andT5sporesallhadsimilarimpacts onSOD,CAT,andPODactivitiesinthePdPapseedlings(no significantdifferencesatp≤0.05).Therewerenodifferences intheconditionsoftheleaves,stems,androotsofthePdPap seedlingsfollowingthefourdifferenttreatments(Fig.6D).
At0.1%NaHCO3,theSODandPODactivitieswasincreased, decreased, and then increased compared with the control group.TheSODactivityofthePdPapseedlingstreatedwith WT,T3,andT5sporesremainedconstantduring1–15dof cul-ture(Fig.7C).ThePODactivityofthePdPapseedlingstreated withWT,T3,andT5sporesremainedconstantduring3–5dof cultureandthendecreased(Fig.7A).TheCATactivitiesofthe PdPapseedlingstreatedtheWT,T3,andT5sporesremained constantfrom3–7dofculture,thendecreasedrapidlyonthe 15thdayofculture(Fig.7A).TheWT,T3,andT5sporeshad similar impactsontheSOD, CAT,and PODactivitiesofthe PdPap seedlings, and there were no significant differences (p≤0.05).ThebiomassofthePdPapseedlingstreatedwiththe WTsporeswerehigherthanthosetreatedwithsporesofthe otherstrains(Fig.7D).
At0.2%NaHCO3,theSODandPODactivitiesfirstincreased, thendecreasedrapidly,andthenincreasedagaincompared
e
a
0.4%NaHCO3 0.3%NaHCO3 0.2%NaHCO3 0.1%NaHCO3f
b
c
d
Fig.5–ConfrontationoftheT3mutantwithR.solani,F.oxysporum,orA.alternataafter10d:challengeoftheT3mutant withR.solani,F.oxysporum,orA.alternataunderdifferentNaHCO3stresses(A–C,thereverseside);challengeoftheT3
a
b
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 1 3 5 7 15 0 1 3 5 7 15POD activity(U mg protein
-1)
SOD activity(U mg protein
-1) CA T activity(U mg protein -1) aaaa c c a POD 0.5%NaHCO3 0.05%NaHCO3 +the WT 0.05%NaHCO3 +the mutant T3
0.05%NaHCO3 +the mutant T5
b b b b b b a a a a aaaa a a c aaaa b b b b b b b bc bc b b b a a a a a a a 30 35 40 45 50 25 20 15 10 5 0 CAT Induced time(d) Induced time(d) Induced time(d) SOD 50 60 40 30 20 10 0 0 1 3 5 7 15 aaaa a a b b c c a b a bba c a a b a a a a
d
c
Fig.6–EnzymaticactivitiesofthePdPapseedlinginteractedwiththeTrichodermasporesandunder0.05%NaHCO3stress:
SOD,CAT,andPODactivitiesofthePdPapseedlingstreatedwiththesporesoftheWT,T3,andT5strainsunder0.05% NaHCO3stress(A–C,respectively);PdPapseedlingstreatedwithsporesoftheWT,T3,andT5mutantsunder0.05%NaHCO3
stress(D).Valuesineachcolumnfollowedbythesameletterarenotsignificantlydifferent(p≤0.05).
tothecontrolgroup.TheSODandPODactivitiesofthePdPap seedlingstreatedwiththeWT,T3, andT5sporeswere the sameasthoseofthecontrolgroup.However,theSOD activ-ityofthePdPap seedlingstreatedwiththeWT,T3,and T5 sporeswashigherthanthatofthecontrolgroupduring3–7d ofculture,especiallyonthe5thdaywhentheSODandPOD activitieswere2.14and1.37 timesgreaterthaninthe con-trolgroup,respectively(Fig.8AandC).TheCATactivityinthe PdPapseedlingstreatedwiththeWT,T3,andT5sporeswas lowerthaninthecontrolgroup(Fig.8B).TheWT,T3,andT5 sporeshadsimilarimpactsontheactivitiesoftheSOD,CAT, andPODinthePdPapseedlings(nosignificantdifferencesat
p≤0.05).
Discussion
Soilsalinizationisaworldwideproblemcausedbythe long-term use of drip irrigation. It has become a major factor limitingagriculturalandforestryproduction.2Wefoundthat the growth of the WT strain of T. asperellum can be pro-motedby 2%NaCl.However, asincubation time increased thepromotioneffectgraduallyweakenedandeventually dis-appeared.TheWT strainhas powerful NaCltolerance, but it cannot grow in PDA containing 10% (1709.40mM) NaCl. TheT59mutanthadbestNaCltoleranceofallthemutants, andcangrowinPDAcontaining10%(1709.40mM)NaCl.Two
T. harzianum salt-tolerant mutants (Th50M6 and Th50M11)
which cangrowinPDAcontainingup to69mMNaClwere obtained.3 Five of forty-five T. harzianum wild-type strains (Th-13,Th-14, Th-19,Th-33,and Th-50)cangrowandform spores in growth containing up to 240mM NaCl.20 The T.
asperellum wild-type strains (TaDORS3 and TaDOR693) can
growonPDAwith1000mMNaCl.27Meanwhile,theNaCl tol-eranceoftheT59mutantis25timeshigherthantheTh50M6 and Th50M11mutants,3 seventimeshigherthan the wild-type strains Th-13, Th-14, Th-19, Th-33, and Th-50,20 and 1.7 times higher than the wild-type strains TaDORS3 and TaDOR693.27
TheTrichodermaWTstrainwasverysensitivetoNaHCO3;
meanwhile,theT3andT5mutantshadbestNaHCO3 toler-anceofall the mutants(T1-T65).Thereare afew previous studiesthat reporttheNaHCO3 toleranceofTrichodermasp. UnderNaClorNaHCO3cultureconditions,themutantsstill exhibited antagonistic abilities towards R. solani, F.
oxyspo-rum, or A. alternata. The mutantT59 grows quickly under
fourdifferentNaClconcentrations,andwasmoreprotective againstthethreekindsofpathogenicfungithantheWTstrain. TheTh50M6mutanthadbetterantagonisticactivitythanthe wild-typestrain,andhadamaximuminhibitionrateof60% againstF.oxysporuminsalinemedia.3Thesaline-tolerantT.
harzianumstrainTh-14significantlyreducedtheincidenceof
F. oxysporum-inducedwiltdisease inchickpeaplants.20 The
T5 mutantalso had antagonistic abilities towards R.solani
and A. alternata under NaHCO3 stress. TheT5 mutanthas
a
b
60 80 40 20 0 0 1 3 5 7 15 0 1 3 5 7 15POD activity(U mg protein
-1)
SOD activity(U mg protein
-1) CA T activity(U mg protein -1) a a aa a b b b POD 0.1%NaHCO3 0.1%NaHCO3 +the WT
0.1%NaHCO3 +the mutant T3
0.1%NaHCO3 +the mutant T5
b b b b b b b a aa aa a a a a aaaa b b b b b b ba a a a a a c a a a a a a 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 CAT Induced time(d) Induced time(d) Induced time(d) SOD 50 40 30 20 10 60 0 0 1 3 5 7 15 a a a a b a b b b b a b a a a a a a b a a b b a a b
d
c
Fig.7–EnzymaticactivitiesofthePdPapseedlinginteractedwiththeTrichodermasporesunder0.1%NaHCO3stress:SOD,
CAT,andPODactivitiesfromthePdPapseedlingstreatedwithsporesoftheWT,T3,andT5strainsunder0.1%NaHCO3
stress(A–C,respectively);PdPapseedlingstreatedwithsporesoftheWT,T3,andT5mutantsunder0.1%NaHCO3stress(D).
Valuesineachcolumnfollowedbythesameletterarenotsignificantlydifferent(p≤0.05).
0.2%(23.81mM)NaHCO3 conditions.Ragazzietal.reported thatdifferentFusariumspecies,includingF.oxysporum,were promoted under salt stress conditions.28 Our results agree withthisreport,astheantagonisticabilitiesoftheT5mutant against F. oxysporum decreased as NaHCO3 concentrations increased.Theantagonistic abilitiesofthe T3mutantwere nearlythesameasthoseoftheT5mutant.The antagonis-ticabilitiesoftheT3mutanttowardsA.alternataunder0.3% (35.71mM) and0.4%(47.62mM)NaHCO3 cultureconditions wereweakerthantheseoftheT5mutant.
Saltrepressesplantgrowthandrootdevelopment.29Ina previousstudy,tomato plantswere abletogrowwhile irri-gateddailywitha2800ppm(2.8mg/L)NaCl solution.3 Grey poplar(Populustremula×alba,syn.Populuscanescens)cangrow inmoderatelevelsofNaCl(75mM).16TheshootgrowthofP.
euphraticawasnotreducedeveninmediacontaining100mM
NaCl.However,theshootgrowthofChinesepoplars(Populus
tomentosaandP.albacv.pyramidalis)wasmarkedlyreducedin
10mMNaCl.30Photosynthesis,leafarea,height,andgrowth diameter of poplars declined rapidly as salinity increased. Someplantmortalityhasbeenobservedafter14daysat1% (170.94mM)NaCl.31 Inthisstudy,theconcentrationofNaCl intheMSmediawas1%(170.94mM)or2%(341.88mM).The PdPapseedlingsbecamewitheredunder1%(170.94mM)or2% (341.88mM)NaClconditions,andtheydiedafter4dofculture. TheNaCltoleranceofthePdPapseedlingswasnotimproved bytreatmentwithWTorT59spores.Thesporesgrewunder
NaClconditions.However,thePdPapseedlingswerecultured inMSsotherewasadifferencebetweentheexperimentaland naturalconditions.
Alkaline salts have been shown to havemuch stronger destructiveeffectsonplantsthanneutralsalts.Whenasaline soilcontainsHCO3−,plantsaresubjecttothedamagingeffects ofbothsaltandalkalistress.32Of12halophytes,mosthad lower germinationpercentages inNaHCO3 than in NaCl.33 Saline-alkaline stress can cause an increase antioxidant enzyme activity.34 Superoxide dismutases (SODs) catalyze the dismutation ofthe superoxide anionto hydrogen and molecular oxygen; this is the first step in active oxygen-scavenging systems. CATand POD are alsoveryimportant foroxygen-scavengingsystems.35Theyplayanimportantrole in protecting cells against various environmental stresses, includingsalinityandalkalinitystress.36Theycanbeusedto evaluatesalinityandalkalinityresistance.Inthisstudy,the impactoftheWT,T3,andT5strainsonSOD,CAT,andPOD activitiesinthePdPapseedlingsweresimilarunderNaHCO3 stress(nosignificantdifferencesatp≤0.05).Underthe0.05% NaHCO3condition,theSODactivityofPdPapseedlingstreated withthe WT,T3, andT5spores increasedsignificantly fol-lowing3–5dofco-culturing.Thisisconsistentwithprevious studies showingthatT.asperellumtreatmentincreasedSOD activityof‘XY335’and‘JY417’maizeseedlingsinsalinesoil and increased the activity of antioxidant enzymes under NaCl stress in cucumbers.10,37 In this study, CAT activity
a
b
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 1 3 5 7 10 0 1 3 5 7 10POD activity(U mg protein
-1)
SOD activity(U mg protein
-1) CA T activity(U mg protein -1) a a aa a a a a POD 0.2%NaHCO3 0.2%NaHCO3 +the WT
0.2%NaHCO3 +the mutant T3 0.2%NaHCO3 +the mutant T5
b b b b b b a a a a a a a a a a aa a a b b b b b b b b b b c a a c c a a a a a 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 CAT Induced time(d) Induced time(d) Induced time(d) SOD 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 1 3 5 7 10 aaaa ab ba c a ba a aa b c a a b b a aa
d
c
Fig.8–TheenzymaticactivitiesofthePdPapseedlingsinteractedwiththeTrichodermasporesunder0.2%NaHCO3stress:
SOD,CAT,andPODactivitiesfromthePdPapseedlingstreatedwithsporesoftheWT,T3,andT5strainsunder0.2% NaHCO3stress(A–C,respectively);PdPapseedlingstreatedwithsporesoftheWT,T3,andT5mutantsunder0.2%NaHCO3
stress(D).Valuesineachcolumnfollowedbythesameletterarenotsignificantlydifferent(p≤0.05).
increased;thesediffersfromapreviousreportshowingthat CAT activity was reduced in leaves and roots following T.
asperellumtreatment.37PODactivitywasdecreasedfollowing
treatment.Previousstudieshaveshownthatsaline–alkaline stressincreasestheactivityofsome,butnotall,antioxidant enzymes.12,38,39 Under 0.1%NaHCO
3 conditions, SOD, CAT, and PODactivitiesin thePdPap seedlingstreated withthe WT,T3,orT5sporeswerelowerthanfromplantsunderthe sameconditionsbutsubjectedto0.05%NaHCO3stress. How-ever, biomassof the PdPap seedlings treatedwith WT,T3, orT5sporeswerehigherthanthoseofthePdPapseedlings treatedwiththespores under0.05%NaHCO3 stress.Under 0.2%NaHCO3stress,theSODandPODactivitiesofthePdPap seedlings treated with WT, T3, and T5 spores was higher thaninthe controlgroup; however,CATactivity waslower than inthe controlgroup.HighCATactivity indicates that theplantsareunderoxidativestress.37 Ourresultssupport thisconclusion.Efficientantioxidantactivitydoesnot neces-sarilyleadtotheup-regulationofallantioxidantenzymes.40 The demand of the oxygen-scavenging enzyme decreased under0.2%NaHCO3 stress.Itispossiblethat theactivities ofother antioxidant enzymes inthe PdPap seedlings were impactedby thespores ofthe WT,T3, or T5strains, lead-ingtoimprovementsintheNaHCO3toleranceofthePdPap seedlings.Thus,theNaHCO3toleranceofthePdPapseedlings canbeimproved bytreating withsporesfrom the WT,T3, and T5 strains grown under 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2% NaHCO3 stress.
Wegeneratedasaline-andtwoalkaline-tolerantT. asperel-lummutants(T59,andT3andT5,respectively);thesemutants had better biocontrol potential under NaCl or NaHCO3 stresses.WeintroduceanewapproachforthebiocontrolofT.
aspellumbygeneratingsaline-oralkaline-tolerantstrainsby
mutationselection.Thisapproachcouldbeusefulfor enhanc-ingsalt and/oralkaline-salttolerance,aswell astheability tobiocontrolforR.solani,A.alternata,andF.oxysporumunder salineoralkalinestressconditions.
Ethical
approval
Themanuscriptdoesnotcontainexperimentsusinganimal orhumanstudies.
Conflicts
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
Acknowledgments
Thiswork wassupported bythe National HighTechnology ResearchandDevelopmentProgram(the13thFive-YearPlan Program) [Grant Number 2016YFC0501505] and the Funda-mental Research Fundsfor the Central Universities, China [GrantNumber2572017AA03].
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
1. DruzhininaIS,Seidl-SeibothV,Herrera-EstrellaA,etal. Trichoderma:thegenomicsofopportunisticsuccess.NatRev Microbiol.2011;9(10):749–759.
2. Bheemaraya,PatilMB,Ramesh,etal.Salinitystresstolerance innativeTrichodermaisolates.EnvironEcol.2013;31:727–729.
3. MohamedHAA,Wafaa,HaggagM,etal.Biocontrolpotential ofsalinitytolerantmutantsofTrichodermaharzianumagainst wiltoftomato.BrazJMicrobiol.2006;37(2):181–191.
4. LatifianM,HamidiesfahaniZ,BarzegarM,etal.Evaluationof cultureconditionsforcellulaseproductionbytwo
Trichodermareeseimutantsundersolid-statefermentation conditions.BioresourceTechnol.2007;98(18):3634–3637.
5. BaileyMJ,NevalainenKMH.Induction,isolationandtesting ofstableTrichodermareeseimutantswithimproved productionofsolubilizingcellulase.EnzymeMicrobTechnol. 1981;3(2):153–157.
6. MandelsM,WeberJ,ParizekR,etal.Enhancedcellulase productionbyamutantofTrichodermaviride.ApplMicrobiol. 1971;21(1):152–154.
7. ZhouJ,WangYH,ChuJ,etal.Identificationandpurification ofthemaincomponentsofcellulasesfromamutantstrain ofTrichodermavirideT100-14.BioresourceTechnol.
2008;99(15):6826–6833.
8. JalónJGD,Gutiérrez-LópezMD.Developmentofamutantof Trichodermacitrinovirideforenhancedproductionof cellulases.BioresourTechnol.2009;100(4):1659–1662.
9. KovácsK,MegyeriL,SzakacsG,etal.Trichodermaatroviride mutantswithenhancedproductionofcellulaseand -glucosidaseonpretreatedwillow.EnzymeMicrobTechnol. 2008;43(1):48–55.
10.BrotmanY,LandauU,Cuadros-InostrozaÁ,etal. Trichoderma-plantrootcolonization:escapingearlyplant defenseresponsesandactivationoftheantioxidant machineryforsalinestresstolerance.PLOSPathog. 2013;9(3):e1003221.
11.FaullJL,GraemecookKA,PilkingtonBL,etal.Productionof anisonitrileantibioticbyanUV-inducedmutantof Trichodermaharzianum.Phytochemistry.1994;36(5):1273–1276.
12.WangWB,KimYH,LeeHS,etal.Analysisofantioxidant enzymeactivityduringgerminationofalfalfaundersaltand droughtstresses.PlantPhysiolBiochemPPB.
2009;47(7):570–577.
13.ZhouX,XuS,LiuL,etal.Degradationofcyanideby Trichodermamutantsconstructedbyrestrictionenzyme mediatedintegration(REMI).BioresourceTechnol. 2007;98(15):2958–2962.
14.WangB,LiuL,GaoY,etal.Improvedphytoremediationof oilseedrape(Brassicanapus)byTrichodermamutant constructedbyrestrictionenzyme-mediatedintegration (REMI)incadmiumpollutedsoil.Chemosphere.
2009;74(10):1400–1403.
15.RawatL,SinghY,ShuklaN,etal.Salinitytolerant
TrichodermaharzianumreinforcesNaCltoleranceandreduces populationdynamicsofFusariumoxysporumf.sp.ciceriin chickpea(CicerarietinumL.)undersaltstressconditions.Arch PhytopatholPlantProt.2013;46(12):1442–1467.
16.EhltingB,DluzniewskaP,DietrichH,etal.Interactionof nitrogennutritionandsalinityinGreypoplar(Populus tremula×alba).PlantCellEnviron.2007;30(7):796–811.
17.Fernàndez-MartínezJ,ZacchiniM,ElenaG,etal.Effectof environmentalstressfactorsonecophysiologicaltraitsand susceptibilitytopathogensoffivePopulusclonesthroughout thegrowingseason.TreePhysiol.2013;33(6):618–627.
18.ChenS,PolleA.SalinitytoleranceofPopulus.PlantBiol. 2010;12(2):317–333.
19.WangYL,LuQ,DecockC,etal.Cytosporaspeciesfrom PopulusandSalixinChinawithC.davidianasp.nov.Fungal Biol-UK.2015;119(5):420–432.
20.RawatL,SinghY,ShuklaN,etal.Seedbioprimingwith salinitytolerantisolatesofTrichodermaharzianumalleviates saltstressinrice:growth,physiologicalandbiochemical characteristics.JPlantPathol.2012;94(2):353–365.
21.QiW,ZhaoL.Studyofthesiderophore-producing TrichodermaasperellumQ1oncucumbergrowthpromotion undersaltstress.JBasicMicrob.2013;53(4):355–364.
22.MullinsED,ChenX,RomaineP,etal.Agrobacterium-mediated transformationofFusariumoxysporum:anefficienttoolfor insertionalmutagenesisandgenetransfer.Phytopathology. 2001;91(2):173–180.
23.JiSD,WangZY,FanHJ,etal.Heterologousexpressionofthe Hsp24fromTrichodermaasperellumimprovesantifungal abilityofPopulustransformantPdpap-Hsp24stoCytospora chrysospermaandAlternariaalternata.JPlantRes.
2016;129(5):921–933.
24.HuangY,MijitiG,WangZ,etal.Functionalanalysisofthe classIIhydrophobingeneHFB2-6fromthebiocontrolagent TrichodermaasperellumACCC30536.MicrobiolRes.
2015;171:8–20.
25.SunWL,LiuLX,HuXL,etal.Generationandidentificationof DNAsequenceflankingT-DNAintegrationsiteofTrichoderma atroviridemutantswithhighdichlorvos-degradingcapacity. BioresourceTechnol.2009;100(23):5941–5946.
26.TsujiG,FujiiS,FujiharaN,etal.Agrobacterium
tumefaciens-mediatedtransformationforrandominsertional mutagenesisinColletotrichumlagenarium.JGenPlantPathol. 2003;69(4):230–239.
27.PoosapatiS,RavulapalliPD,TippirishettyN,etal.Selection ofhightemperatureandsalinitytolerantTrichoderma isolateswithantagonisticactivityagainstSclerotiumrolfsii. Springerplus.2014;3(1):1–11.
28.RagazziA,VecchioV,DellavalleI,etal.Variationsinthe pathogenicityofFusariumoxysporumf.sp.vasinfectumin relationtothesalinityofthenutrientmedium.JPlantDis Prot.1994;101(3):263–266.
29.ContrerascornejoHA,MacíasrodríguezL,AlfarocuevasR, etal.Trichodermaspp.improvegrowthofArabidopsis seedlingsundersaltstressthroughenhancedroot development,osmoliteproduction,andNa+elimination
throughrootexudates.MolPlantMicrobeInteract. 2014;27(6):503–514.
30.KangJM,KojimaK,IdeY,etal.Growthresponsetothestress oflowosmoticpotential,salinityandhighpHincultured shootofChinesepoplars.JForestResJpn.1996;1(1): 27–29.
31.FungLE,WangSS,AltmanA,etal.EffectofNaClongrowth, photosynthesis,ionandwaterrelationsoffourpoplar genotypes.ForestEcolManag.1998;107(1–3):135–146.
32.TangC,TurnerNC.Theinfluenceofalkalinityandwater stressonthestomatalconductance,photosyntheticrateand growthofLupinusangustifoliusL.andLupinuspilosusMurr. AnimProdSci.1999;39(4):457–464.
33.ZhangH,ZhangG,LüX,etal.Salttoleranceduringseed germinationandearlyseedlingstagesof12halophytes.Plant Soil.2015;388(1–2):229–241.
34.MittlerR.Oxidativestress,antioxidantsandstresstolerance. TrendsPlantSci.2002;7(9):405–410.
35.AmakoK,ChenGX,AsadaK,etal.Separateassayspecificfor ascorbateperoxidaseandguaiacolperoxidaseandfor chloroplasticandcytosolicisoenzymesofascorbate peroxidaseinplants.PlantCellPhysiol.1994;35(3): 497–504.
36.MccordJM,FridovichI.Superoxidedismutase.Anenzymic functionforerythrocuprein(hemocuprein).JBiolChem. 1969;244(22):6049–6055.
37.FuJ,LiuZ,LiZ,etal.Alleviationoftheeffectsof saline-alkalinestressonmaizeseedlingsbyregulationof activeoxygenmetabolismbyTrichodermaasperellum.PLOS ONE.2017;12(6):e179617.
38.KimSY,LimJH,ParkMR,etal.Enhancedantioxidant enzymesareassociatedwithreducedhydrogenperoxidein barleyrootsundersalinestress.JBiochemMolBiol.
2005;38(2):218–224.
39.KimY,AriharaJ,NakayamaT,etal.Antioxidativeresponses andtheirrelationtosalttoleranceinEchinochloaoryzicola VasingandSetariavirdis(L.)Beauv.PlantGrowthRegul. 2004;44(1):87–92.
40.AbogadallahGM.Antioxidativedefenseundersaltstress. PlantSignalBehav.2010;5(4):369–374.