• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Prerequisites, general criteria and primary studies required in the Coalbed Methane prospecting and exploring: A review

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Prerequisites, general criteria and primary studies required in the Coalbed Methane prospecting and exploring: A review"

Copied!
81
0
0

Texto

(1)

Prerequisites, general criteria and

primary studies required in the

Coalbed Methane prospecting and

exploring: A review

M.J. Lemos de Sousa

1

H.J. Pinheiro

2

C. Rodrigues

1

1 University Fernando Pessoa, CEMAS, Porto, Portugal.

(2)

Notice

(3)

Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal

™

Main objectives

:

¾

To develop R & D projects related with Modelling and

Analysis of Environment Systems (5 + 2 current R & D

projects)

¾

To assist Post-graduated teaching and student training

™

Staff: 22 researchers of which

¾

17 Ph D

¾

2 M Sc

(4)

Contacts:

Professor Manuel Lemos de Sousa

[email protected]

[email protected]

Dr Cristina F. A. Rodrigues

[email protected]

[email protected]

(5)

Research Team Practice in CBM studies

¾

Lorraine Basin (France) – Conoco, Dupont

¾

Waterberg Basin (South Africa) – Anglo Coal

¾

Spain

¾

Brazil

¾

Chile

(6)

Research Team main Publications

see:

www.ufp.pt

Bibliotecas

B-DIGITAL UFP

(7)

Presented to the AAPG I nternational Conference,

Barcelona, September 21- 24, 2003.

(8)

Key words

Abstract

1. Definition

2. Generation

3. Storage

versus

release

4. Criteria to be followed in prospecting/exploring for CBM

5. Basic and fundamental studies in CBM prospecting/exploring

5.1. Gas content

5.2. Molar composition of the produced gas

5.3. Coal sorption (adsorption + desorption) isotherms

5.4. Detailed study of the Cleat System

5.5. Water produced with Coalbed Methane

6. Conclusions

7. References

(9)

Key-words:

Coal, Coalbed Methane (CBM), Natural gas, Exploration,

Prospection, Sorption (adsorption, desorption) isotherms.

Abstract:

The main objectives of this paper are: (i) to review and

summarize current concepts of Coalbed Methane (CBM) genesis

and storage, (ii) to highlight and present the principal

procedures and methodologies concerned with

prospecting/exploring of CBM leading to a sequence of basic

(10)
(11)

Definition

Coalbed Methane (CBM)

is a natural gas,

generated and/or stored in coal seams in

situ and mainly composed of energy gases

(combustible gases) of which methane is

predominant.

(12)

Natural gas composition

(13)

Seam gas

Firedamp gas

In situ

Active coal mines

Abandoned coal mines

Coalbed Methane

CBM

Coalseam Methane

CSM

Coalmine Methane

CMM

Vol. %

Vol. %

Vol. %

CH

4

90 - 95

CH

4

25 - 60

CH

4

60 - 80

CO

2

2 - 4

CO

2

1 - 6

CO

2

8 - 15

CO

0

CO

0.1 - 0.4

CO

0

O

2

0

O

2

7 - 17

O

2

0

N

2

1 - 8

N

2

4 - 40

N

2

5 - 32

H

2

O - residual

H

2

O - residual

H

2

O - residual

(14)
(15)

Biogenic gas

Methane gas that was generated by microorganisms

at the Earth’s surface or at shallow depths within

sedimentary basins (McCabe et al. 1993).

Generated in different stages

(16)

Natural gas formed by the thermal decomposition of

organic matter in rocks as they are buried (increasing

pressure

and temperature) in sedimentary

basins

(McCabe et al. 1993).

Thermogenic gas

Devolatilisation products:

♦ methane

♦ carbon dioxide

♦ water

™

The relative amount of

these products can be

(17)

Sub-bituminous coal 0 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Atomic ratio H/C 0.5 0.4

0.1 0.2 0.3

Atomic ratio O/C

Kerogen type I

Kerogen type II

Catagenesis Metagenesis Residual organic matter Diagenesis Immature zone Principal zone of

oil formation

Zone of gas formation

dry

wet

Anthracite and meta-anthracite

Kerogen type III

(Peat) Lignite

Principal products of Kerogen evolution

CO2; H2O;

Biogenic CH4

Oil

Gas

Bitumin ouscoa

l

Data from: Tissot and Welte 1984, Durand and Monin 1980, and B. Durand per. commun.

(18)

Major stages of hydrocarbons generation

(19)

Isotope ratios of gases

(after Wiese and Kvenvolden 1993, modified)

δ

D

(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)

Characteristics of coal as CBM reservoir

9

Coal is simultaneously a source rock and a reservoir

rock

9

The mechanism of gas storage: condensed form very

close to a liquid state

9

Coal moisture:

ƒ

Moisture Holding Capacity/Equilibrium moisture

ƒ

Water of meteoric origin

ƒ

Water from adjacent aquifers

(24)

Volume (cm

3

) of methane generated and

stored per gram of coal with increasing rank

Coal rank* High-Volatile Bituminous Medium-Volatile Bituminous Low-Volatile Bituminous Semi-anthracite Anthracite Molecular storage Total storage Pore storage Generation volume

0 3500 7000

scf/ton

* ASTM D-388 Standard

(25)

Generalised production history of a CBM well

Dewatering

stage

Stable production

stage Decline

stage

Production

TIME

Methane

(26)
(27)

Gas release

Clea t

Stored gas in the pores Released gas into

the coal matrix

Diffusion of the released gas through the coal matrix to reach the cleat

Flow of free gas through the cleat

system

Lowering the pressure on the coal by removing the water

G a s d iffu s io n th ro u g h th e c o a lm at rix c o n tro lle d b yt h e c o n c en trat io n o f g a

s Free gas mo

ves in

response to

a pressure

(28)

4.

Criteria to be

followed in

(29)

Criteria to be followed in prospecting/exploring

for CBM

¾

Sufficient coal resources/reserves

¾

Required rank, petrographic composition and

percentage of mineral matter

¾

Favourable geological and structural conditions

™

significant number of seams per unit, of reasonable thickness;

(30)

UN International

Framework Classification

For Reserves/Resources

(31)
(32)

5.

Basic and

fundamental studies

in CBM

(33)

Basic and fundamental studies in CBM

prospecting/exploring

9

Gas content: Q1 (lost), Q2 (desorbed) and Q3 (residual)

9

Molar composition of the produced gas

9

Gas sorption (adsorption + desorption) isotherms

9

Detailed study of the Cleat System

9

Water produced with Coalbed Methane

¾

Total moisture and Moisture Holding Capacity analyses

¾

Density

¾

Proximate and Ultimate analyses

¾

Petrographic analyses (Reflectance, Macerals, Microlithotypes,

Carbominerites and Minerite)

¾

Mineral Matter content by low-temperature ashing

¾

Chemical and mineralogical analyses of the mineral matter

¾

Isotopic composition of produced gas

¾

Palaeofacies of coal sedimentation

Ge ne ra l a na lyse s:

(34)

Oversimplifications can

lead to faulty coalbed

gas reservoir analysis

(35)

Q

1

(lost)

Q

2

(desorbed)

Q

3

(residual)

(36)

Gas content determinations (Q

2

and Q

3

)

-USBM direct method

(37)

R

e

s

id

u

a

l

g

a

s

(Q

3

(38)
(39)

Chromatographic analyses of

molar composition of gases

Analysis Report of sample WTB 10/114

Method Name: C:\CP-Maitre Elite\Projects\Default\Methods\gas1.met File Name: C:\CP-Maitre Elite\Data\Waterberg\WTB10-114(Gas1)(3).dat Aquisition: 06-08-2002 18:15:40

Report: 19-08-2002 11:14:00

Seconds

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

Vo lt s 0 5 10 0 5 10 O2 (N 2 ) (CH4 )

M icroGC Channel A

N am e

Pk # Name Retention Time Area Concentration

1 O2 31,990 40676328 103,790

N2 0,000 BDL

CH4 0,000 BDL

Totals

40676328 103,790

Seconds

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240

Vo lt s 0 5 10 0 5 10 (C O 2 ) (C 2H 6) H2 O (C 3H 8) (C 4H 10) (C 5H 12)

M icroG C C han nel B

N am e

Pk # Name Retention Time Area Concentration

CO2 0,000 BDL

C2H6 0,000 BDL

2 H2O 33,640 940439 214,712

C3H8 0,000 BDL

C4H10 0,000 BDL

C5H12 0,000 BDL

Totals

(40)

5.3.

Coal Sorption

(41)

Gas Sorption (Adsorption + Desorption)

Isotherms

The main objectives related to this experimental method are:

to determine the maximum gas storage capacity

of a coal

in situ

.

to estimate the actual volume of gas

in situ

.

to estimate the gas saturation degree of a coal by

the difference between the maximum gas storage

capacity and the actual volume of gas.

to estimate the diffusion rate of gas flow.

to estimate the gas stored composition.

to estimate the volume of gas that will be released

(42)

Isotherm Models

Gibbs

Potential theory

(43)

Ò

Provides a good description of sorption for

microporous sorbents such as coal, where the

gas molecule and sorbent pore size are of

comparable size.

Ò

This model describes the existing

equilibrium between the stored gas and the

free gas in microporous structures.

Langmuir Isotherms

(44)

V

= (VL x P)/(P+PL)

Langmuir equation

V

=

adsorbed gas volume (scf/ton or cm

3

/g)

VL

=

Langmuir volume (scf/ton or cm

3

/g)

P

=

pressure (Psi or MPa)

(45)

Prototype for the determination of

gas adsorption isotherms by coal.

1. Reference cell; 2. Sample cell; 3. Helium valve; 4. Methane valve; 5. Supply valve;

6. Purge valve of the system; 7. Purge valve of the cells; 8. Termocouple (temperature T2);

9. Thermocouple (temperature T3); 10. Connection valve between cells; 11. Thermostatic

head; 12. Thermometer (T1); 13. Voltmeter; 14. Computer with software to performe the

(46)

Variables that influence a coal isotherm

(in terms of gas storage)

Gas compressibility factor

Experimental

Moisture

Temperature

Pressure

Gas composition

Coal sample characteristics

Rank

Petrographic composition

(47)

Moisture effect

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Pressure (MPa)

Gas Volume (cm3/g)

Moisture 3.0%

„

Moisture 5.7%

Œ

Moisture 11.5%

sc

f/

to

n

40

80

120

160

200

240

200

400

psi

600

800

(48)

Pressure effect

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Pressure (MPa)

Gas Volume (cm3/g)

P2

P1

G2

G1

40

80

120

160

200

240

200

400

psi

600

800

sc

f/

to

(49)

Temperature effect

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0

2

4

6

8

Pressure (MPa)

Gas Volume (cm3/g)

80

160

240

320

400

480

250

500

psi

750

1000

T = 30ºC

T = 22ºC

15%

sc

f/

to

(50)

Mineral matter effect

0

1

2

3

4

5

0

2

4

6

8

Pressure (MPa)

Gas Volume (cm3/g)

MM = 44%

MM = 7%

61%

34

68

102

136

170

250

500

psi

750

1000

sc

f/

to

(51)

Rank effect

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0

2

4

6

8

Pressure (MPa)

Gas Volume (cm3/g)

Rr = 1.93%

Rr = 0.91%

Rr = 0.43%

63%

28%

40

80

120

160

200

240

250

500

psi

750

1000

(52)

Petrographic composition effect

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Pressure (MPa)

Gas Volume (cm3/g)

V=72%; L=6%; I=22%

V=83%; L=6%; I=11%

40

80

120

160

200

240

200

400

psi

600

800

sc

f/

to

(53)

Gas composition effect

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Pressure (MPa)

Gas Volume (cm3/g)

CO

2

N

2

CH

4

+ CO

2

+ N

2

CH

4

100

200

300

400

500

200

400

psi

600

800

sc

f/

to

(54)
(55)

Accuracy values for the compressibility factor

10 20 30 40 50 60

0 200 400 600 800

P re s s ure ( ps i)

0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 N2 Accuracy 50 100 150 200 250 300

0 200 400 600 800 1000

P re s s ure ( ps i)

0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 CH4 + CO2 + N2

Accuracy 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220

0 200 400 600 800 1000

Pressure (psi) 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 Accuracy CH4 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

0 200 400 600 800

P re s s ure ( ps i)

(56)

Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Ciências Departamento de Geologia

Dezembro 2002

Cristina Fernanda Alves Rodrigues

The application of isotherm studies to

evaluate the Coalbed Methane potential of

(57)

Santa Terezinha Basin (Brazil) Isotherms

0 50 100 150 200 250

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Pressão (psi)

Volume de gás (scf/ton)

(58)

Brazil - Santa Catarina, Leão, Candiota and

Chico Lomã basins Isotherms

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Pressão (psi)

Volume de gás (scf/ton)

Gas content

Pressure

S.Catarina

Chico Lomã

Leão

(59)

Brazilian Coal Basin

Isotherms

0 50 100 150 200 250

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Pressão (psi)

Volume de gás (scf/ton)

(60)

Gas sorption isotherms from

lignite to anthracite

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Pressure (psi)

Gas content (scf/ton)

G

F

H

E

D

C

B

A

(Rr=0.17%)

(61)

Adsorption/desorption curves of

anthracites

0 100 200 300 400

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Pressure (psi)

Gas Content (scf/ton)

Adsorption Desorption

Sample F (Rr=2.10%)

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Pressure (psi)

Gas Content (scf/ton)

Adsorption Desorption

Sample G (Rr=3.07%)

0 100 200 300 400

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Pressure (psi)

Gas Content (scf/ton)

Adsorption Desorption

(62)
(63)

(a) cleat characteristics in plan view;

(b) cleat hierarchies in cross- section view

Schematic illustration of coal cleat

Schematic illustration of coal cleat

(64)

¾

Cleat directions relative to a reference;

¾

Cleat frequency;

Coal cleat characteristics

¾

Cleat height;

¾

Cleat length;

¾

Cleat spacing;

¾

Number of cleat connectivity/intersections;

¾

Cleat aperture;

(65)

Save time

Save money

High accuracy

Representative statistical data

“time is money!”

Direct link between field

and computerized data

“Coal-core tectonics” (CCT) Method

(66)

b

Statistical analyses from georeferentiated data

Plane W-E (W dip direction)

0 20 40 60 80 100 dip (degree) Fr e q ue nc y ( % )

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Cleat frequency (decrease order)

Cleat lines measured in N-S plane (N dip direction)

Cleat lines measured in W-E plane (E dip direction)

1 88º →0º 88º →90º

2 89º → 0º 87º → 90º

3 87º → 0º 85º → 90º

4 85º → 0º 86º →90º

5 86º → 0º 84º → 90º

6 80º → 0º 89º → 90º

7 3º → 0º; 83º → 0º and 84º → 0º 83º → 90º

8 2º → 0º 3º → 90º

9 5º → 0º 82º → 90º

10 82º → 0º 7º → 90º and 5º → 90º

Mean Direction = 89-045 Mean Resultant dir'n = 89/045 Mean Resultant length = 1,00

(Variance = 0,00) Calculated. girdle: 89/045

N

Plane: N 135º, 89ºE

Mean Orientation = 87/037 Mean Resultant dir'n = 87-037 Mean Resultant length = 1,00

(Variance = 0,00) Calculated. girdle: 8/145 Calculated beta axis: 82-325

N

Mean Plane: N 127º, 87ºE

Dip direction interval 120º - 150º

(67)

Class

designation Dip interval

Class 0 0º

Class 1 > 0º and ≤ 30º Class 2 > 30º and ≤ 60º Class 3 > 60º and ≤ 90º

Class 4 90

b

Connectivity frequency

Connectivity frequency 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

0-1 0-2 0-3 0-4 1-2 1-3 1-4 2-3 2-4 3-4

Classes

Fr

equency (

%

(68)

N

Horizontal

(69)
(70)
(71)

A

“Black water” (San Juan Basin) – Reduced iron and manganese, and sulphide smell.

B

“Red water” (Black Warrior Basin) – Oxidized iron.

C,D

Stained appliances in households in the Black Warrior Basin – Precipitated insoluble iron oxides.

A

B

C

D

(72)

Water production in some USA major

coal-bed-methane-producing basins

Avg. Water production

Basin State No. of

wells (Bbl/day/well) (m3

/day/well)

Ratio

H2O/gas

Primary disposal

method

San Juan Colo./New Mexico 3089 25 2981 0.031 Injection

Black Warrior Alab. 2917 58 6916 0.55 Surface disch.

Powder River Wyo./Mont. 2737 400 47696 2.75 Ibid.

Uinta Utah 393 215 25637 0.42 Injection

Raton Colo. 459 266 31718 1.34 Ibid.

(73)
(74)

Fate of CBM Water

CBM water

Reuse

Disposal

Treatment

Stock ponds/

irrigation Wetlands

Water supplies

Injection Surface

discharge Surface ponding

(75)
(76)

In Conclusion

¾

Continuous re-evaluation and refinement of

the criteria and parameters required for

CBM prospecting/exploration is the only way

in which

over-

or

underestimations

can be

avoided or entirely eliminated.

(77)

¾

The systematic application of the

mentioned criteria should be regarded

as

decisive steps

that will allow for

(78)

¾

The

cost

apparently associated with very

specialized investigations (sorption isotherms,

cleat system, etc) are fully justified and should

be considered as an

investment

,

since their

contribution

seriously reduces the risk

associated with

later decisions

, such as whether

or not to conduct further drilling and more

(79)

7.

References

AST M De signa t ion: D 3 8 8 -9 9 (Re a pprove d 2 0 0 4 ) - Standard Classification of Coals by Rank. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards 2005, Section 5, Petroleum Products, Lubricants, and Fossil Fuels, Vol.05.05, Gaseous Fuels: Coal and Coke, p.218-223. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2005.

Aye rs J r., W.B., 2 0 0 2 . Coalbed gas systems, resources, and production and a review of contrasting cases from San Juan and Powder River basins. In: B.E.Law and J.B.Curtis, Eds, Unconventional Petroleum Systems. AAPG Bull., Tulsa, Okl., 86, 11: 1853-1890.

Dia m ond, W.P. a nd Le vine , J .R., 1 9 8 1 . Direct Method Determination of the Gas Content of Coal: Procedures and Results. United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Report of investigations 8515, 36 pp.

Dura nd, B. a nd M onin, J .C., 1 9 8 0 . Elemental analysis of kerogens (C, H, O, N, S, Fe). In B.Durand, Kerogen. Insoluble Organic Matter from Sedimentary rocks, p.113-142. Edtions Technip, Paris.

(80)

Gorody, A.W, 2 0 0 1 . Coalbed methane production faces numerous concerns. Oil and Gas J., 99.30: 66-70.

Le vine , J .R., 1 9 9 2 . Oversimplifications can lead to faculty coalbed gas reservoir analisis. Oil & Gas J., Tulsa, Okl., 90, 47: 63-69.

McCabe, P.J., Gautier, D.L., Lewan, M.D. and Turner, C., 1993. The Future of Energy Gases. U.S.Geol.Surv. Curcular, Washington. D.C., 1115, p.1-58.

Prinzhofe r, A. a nd Ba t t a ni, A., 2 0 0 3 . Gas Isotopes Tracing: an Important Tool for Hydrocarbons Exploration. In: B.Colletta, Ed., Insights into Petroleum Geochemistry. Oil & Gas Science and Technology, Special Issue - Rev. IFP, 58, 2: 299-311.

Ric e , D.D., 1 9 9 3 . Composition and Origins of Coalbed Gas. In: B.E.Law and D.D.Rice, Eds, Hydrocarbons from coal, AAPG Studies in Geology 38, p.159-184. American Association of Petroleum Geologists. Tulsa, Okl.

Ric e , D.D., La w , B.L. a nd Cla yt on, J .L., 1 9 9 3 . Coalbed Gas - An Undeveloped Resource. In: D.G.Howell, Ed., The Future of Energy Gases. U.S. Geol.Surv. Professional Paper, Washington. D.C., 1570, p.389-404.

(81)

U nit e d N a t ions I nt e rna t iona l Fra m e w ork . Classification for Reserves/Resources - Solid Fuels and Mineral Commodities. Final Version, 174 pp. United Nations Economic and Social Council, Economic Commission for Europe, Committee on Sustainable Energy, Geneva, 1997. (Document Energy/WP.1/R.77).

Wie se , K . a nd K ve nvolde n, K .A., 1 9 9 3 . Introduction to Microbial and Thermal Methane. In: D.G.Howell, Ed., The Future of Energy Gases. U.S. Geol.Surv. Professional Paper, Washington. D.C., 1570, p.13-20.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Os modelos desenvolvidos por Kable & Jeffcry (19RO), Skilakakis (1981) c Milgroom & Fry (19RR), ('onfirmam o resultado obtido, visto que, quanto maior a cfiráda do

The fourth generation of sinkholes is connected with the older Đulin ponor-Medvedica cave system and collects the water which appears deeper in the cave as permanent

Este artigo discute o filme Voar é com os pássaros (1971) do diretor norte-americano Robert Altman fazendo uma reflexão sobre as confluências entre as inovações da geração de

Para determinar o teor em água, a fonte emite neutrões, quer a partir da superfície do terreno (“transmissão indireta”), quer a partir do interior do mesmo

Nessa perspectiva, uma das formas de abordagem da Acessibilidade informacional é, portanto, o estudo dos fatores e das melhores práticas que a favorecem. Do ponto de vista do núcleo

Uma das explicações para a não utilização dos recursos do Fundo foi devido ao processo de reconstrução dos países europeus, e devido ao grande fluxo de capitais no

Neste trabalho o objetivo central foi a ampliação e adequação do procedimento e programa computacional baseado no programa comercial MSC.PATRAN, para a geração automática de modelos

Estrutura para análises fisico-químicas laboratoriais 23 Pesca com 'galão' realizada no açude Paus Branco, Madalena/CE 28 Macrófitas aquáticas flutuantes no nude Paus