ABSTRACT
acomparativestudybetween
patientsandfamilymembers
SchizophreniaProjectOutpatientClinic,InstituteofPsychiatry,Faculdade
deMedicinadaUniversidadedeSãoPaulo(PROJESQ),SãoPaulo,Brazil
OriginalA
rticle
INTRODUCTION
Alackofinsightwasthemostprevalent symptom of schizophrenia found in two seminal international studies, the Interna-tional Pilot Study of Schizophrenia (IPSS)1 andtheClassificationofChronicHospital-ized Schizophrenics (CCHS).2 In addition, lackofinsighthasbeenincludedamongthe 12 symptoms that have the highest power to discriminate schizophrenia from other psychosesanddepression.3Ithasbeenshown thatpatientswithbetterinsightaremorelikely to present better adherence to treatment.4,5 Lackofinsighthasbeencorrelatedwithworse outcome,6moreadmissions,6 worsepsycho-socialfunctioning,7,8reducedsuccessratesin outpatienttreatmentofrelapses,9andlonger intervalbetweentheonsetofsymptomsand theseekingoftreatment.10
Therelationshipbetweeninsightandpsy-chopathologyiscontroversial.Someauthors haveproposedthatinsightisindependentof psychopathology11,12whileothershavefound anegativecorrelationbetweeninsightandthe generalmeasuresofpsychopathology.13Ina recentmeta-analysisof40studies,Mintzetal.
concludedthatthereisindeedanassociation between insight and psychopathology that is weak and mediated by the phase of the illness,aswellasbythepatient’sageatonset ofthesymptoms.Theydescribedanegative correlation between the positive symptoms ofschizophreniaandinsightthatisstronger amongpatientsintheacutephase,andanega-tivecorrelationbetweennegativesymptoms and insight that is stronger among patients withlateonsetofsymptoms.14
Manystudieshaveshownapositiverela-tionshipbetweeninsightandthedepressive symptoms of schizophrenia.14,15 Insight has been found to be associated with a higher risk of suicide,16,17 but this finding has not been confirmed.18A faint correlation or no correlationatallhasbeendescribedbetween insightandneuropsychologicaldeficits.11,12,19 Areductionintheoverallsizeofthebrain20 andatrophyofthefrontallobe21havebeen shown among patients with insight impair-ment.Startup22suggestedthatarelationship betweencognitivedeficitsandinsightmight only exist among some subpopulations of patients and that there might be stronger influenceofpsychologicalandsociocultural factorsamongthosewhosecognitivefunctions butnotinsightarepreserved.Lysakeretal.23 foundsignificantevidencetosupporttheidea thattheremightbetwodistinctgroupswith insightimpairment:onewithdeficitsoftheex-ecutivefunctions,andtheotherwithastrong tendencytousepsychologicalmechanismsof denialoftheillness.Theroleofpsychological defensesintheformationofinsighthasalready beenrecognizedbysomeauthors.24,25
Thesocioculturalcontext
Thescarcityofstudiesonthesocialand culturalinfluencesoninsightarisesinspiteof thelargenumberofworksontheroleplayed bythosefactorsintheonset,diagnosis,treat-mentandprognosisofschizophrenia.26-28
AccordingtoKirmayerandCorin,29the individual’scapacityforself-knowledgestems mainly from social processes, involving the observationofothersandtheacquisitionof CONTEXT:
Despitetherecognitionoftherolethatso-cioculturalfactorsplayintheprocessofacquiring insight,recentresearchonthisissueisscarce. OBJECTIVES:1)totranslateandadapttheSchedule
forAssessmentofInsight(SAI)toPortuguese;2)to useamodifiedversionofittoevaluatefamilymem-bers’insightintoschizophrenia;3)tocompare patients’insightwithfamilymembers’insight. TYPEOFSTUDY:Cross-sectionalstudy.
SETTING: Schizophrenia Project Outpatient Clinic (Projesq), Institute of Psychiatry, Faculdade de MedicinadaUniversidadedeSãoPaulo. METHODS:
40patientswithschizophrenia(Diagnos-tic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders –FourthEdition—DSM-IV)undergoingoutpatient treatmentandmembersoftheirrespectivefamilies wereinterviewedusingtheSAIandamodified versionofthisinstrument,respectively. RESULTS: Family members performed better than
patientsinthetotalandpartialSAIscores[total: 13.0to8.75(p<0.001);adherence:3.9to3.4 (p<0.005);recognitionofillness:5.5to3.5(p< 0.001);relabelingofpsychoticphenomena:3.6 to1.9(p<0.001)].However,whenthescores werecorrelatedforeachpatient-familymember pair,theonlypartialscorethathadanegative correlationwastherelabelingofpsychoticphe-nomena(r=-0.14),whiletheothershadpositive correlations (total r = 0.401; adherence r = 0.410;recognitionofillnessr=0.422). DISCUSSION:Therewasalackofcorrelationbetween
thescoresoffamilymembersandpatientsregard-ingtheabilitytorelabelpsychoticphenomenaas abnormal.Thismightbeunderstoodasasmaller influenceofsocioculturalfactorsinthisdimension than in other dimensions. The fact that family memberswerenotassessedforthepresenceof psychopathologyisalimitationofthisstudy. CONCLUSIONS:Differentdimensionsofinsightare
notequallyinfluencedbydiseaseandsociocul-tural factors. The recognition of illness is more stronglyinfluencedbysocioculturalfactorsthan the ability to relabel psychotic phenomena as abnormal.
ways to describe oneself that are specific to theculturethattheindividualcomesfrom. Therefore, insight is not a mere act of the patient’sself-perceptionthatheorsheisill, butratheraconstructionthatdependsonthe socioculturalcontext.
AccordingtoJohnsonandOrrell,30 psy-chotic patients disagree with their doctors as to their symptoms and illness not only because they are ill, but also because they haveadifferentconceptoftheirexperience, whichismoldedbytheirsocioculturalcontext. Therearestandardizedwaysofthoughtand actionforreportingtheexperiencingofillness thatareguidedbythelocalculture.Patients use these standards, which may differ from thephysicians’standardsandfromthoseof patientsfromdifferentcultures.31,32Cultural influences on the self-evaluation of mental illness are found when groups of psychotic patients from different cultures are studied andcompared.33,34
Inadditiontothedifferentconceptionsof mentalillness,thereareotherimportantsocio-culturalfactors.Whiteetal.35foundastrong association between the size of the primary group(familyandclosefriends)andinsight. Theystated,asalsopostulatedbyBreierand Strauss,36thatbroadersocialcontactexertsa normalizingfunctionontheindividualthat leadstobetterinsight.
Another sociocultural factor that could interfere in the evaluation of mental illness bypatientscouldbestigma,whichwouldbe strongerinsomespecificcultures.30Thereis evidencethatpatients’denialoftheirillness could buffer the impact of the stigma on patients’self-appraisal.37
JohnsonandOrrel30statedthatdifferent dimensionsofinsightareinfluencedindifferent waysbypsychosocialfactors.Theabilitytorelabel psychoticphenomenaasabnormalisinfluenced morebypsychopathologicalfactorsthanbysocio-culturalones.Recognitionofillnessisthevariable mostaffectedbythelatterfactors.
Evaluationoftheattitudeoffamilymem-bersregardingtheillness
Angermeyer and Matschinger38 studied familymembers’beliefsregardingthecauses ofschizophrenia,andshowedthattheyattrib-utedittobiologicalfactors.Thisperception differedfromthatofthegeneralpopulation, forwhompsychosocialfactorswereconsidered tobethemostimportantones.Theseauthors considered this finding to be the result of the closer contact of family members with the treatment system, as well as their need
Table1.Demographicandclinicalcharacteristicsofthesample ofpatientsandfamilymembers
Demographiccharacteristics patients
(n=40)
family members
(n=40)
*χ2/tt test
p
Gender%(n) Male Female
52.5(21) 47.5(19)
20.0(8) 80.0(32)
9.14* 0.002
Ageinyears(95%CI) 30.6
(27.5-33.8)
50.1 (46.3-53.9)
-8.0 0.001
Maritalstatus%(n) Single
Married Separated Widowed
75.0(30) 17.5(7) 7.5(3)
-7.5(3) 60.0(24)
15.0(6) 17.5(7)
39.4* 0.001
Ethnicity%(n) White Mixed Asian
77.5(31) 12.5(5) 10.0(4)
77.5(31) 15.0(6)
7.5(3)
0.23* 0.89
Religion%(n) Catholic Evangelical Buddhist Spiritualist Others Noreligion
55.0(22) 15.0(6) 5.0(2)
-10.0(4) 15.0(6)
60.0(24) 15.0(6)
7.5(3) 5.0(2) 2.5(1) 10.0(4)
4.49* 0.48
Yearsofeducation(95%CI) 9.2(8.3-10.1) 9.6(8.0-11.1) 4.24t 0.673
Clinicalcharacteristics Previoushospitalization%(n) Numberofprevious
hospitalizations,‡mean(95%CI)
Timespenthospitalizedover lifetimeinweeks,‡mean(95%CI)
Durationofillnessinyears, mean(95%CI)
Presentpsychotherapy treatment%(n)
Familyhistoryof schizophrenia%(n)
Patientswhoattempted suicide%(n)
Age at onset of illness in years, mean(95%CI)
65(26)
3.35(1.7-4.9)
13.6(3.9-23.3)
7.9(5.7-10.1)
12.5(5)
52.6(20)
30(12)
23.1(20.5-25.6)
‡Referstopatientswhohadalreadybeenhospitalized;CI=confidenceinterval. to deal with the guilt related to the illness. However, in a study by Holzinger et al.,39 familymembersalsoconsideredthepsycho-socialcausestobethemainones.Inanother study,AngermeyerandMatschinger40cameto theconclusionthatpersonalexperiencewith mentally ill patients led to a more positive attitudeandtofewerreactionsoffear.
The influence of family members on patients’insightintotheirillnesshasbeen
patients presented similar scores. Family members’resultswerebetterinrelationto theattributionofsymptomstotheillness. Bothgroupsidentifiedahighernumberof symptomsthantheywereabletoattribute totheillness.
Measurementofinsight
Therearesomestandardizedinstruments designed for assessing insight. All of them approach insight from a dimensional point ofview.David43developedtheSchedulefor Assessment of Insight (SAI), made up of threedistinctcomponents:(a)adherenceto treatment,(b)recognitionofhavingamental
illness and (c) ability to relabelpsychotic phenomenaasabnormal.Thisinstrumentwas validatedinapopulationof63schizophrenic patients(45underoutpatienttreatmentand 18hospitalized).44
Amador et al.6 developed the Scale to Assess Unawarenessof Mental Disorder (SUMD) comprising the general items of generalawarenessofhavingamentaldisor-der, awareness of the benefits of treatment andawarenessofthesocialconsequencesof thedisorder,inadditiontotwosubscalesfor evaluatingawarenessandattributionforeach symptom.Trainingisrequiredforitsadmin-istration.Fiss45translateditintoPortuguese,
Figure1.HistogramsofthescoresfortheScheduleforAssessmentofInsight(versionsforpatientsandfamilymembers)among 40patientsand40familymembersinapsychiatricserviceinSãoPaulo,Brazil.t=-6.29;p<0.001.
adapted it to our environment and studied itsreliability.
Giventhevalidationdata,thebrevityof thescaleandthepossibilityofadaptingitto familymembers,wechosetousetheSAIin thiswork.
Theobjectivesofthisstudywereto: 1. Translate and adapt the Schedule for
AssessmentofInsight(SAI)tothePortu-gueselanguage;
2. Useamodifiedversionofthisinstrument toevaluatefamilymembers’insightinto schizophrenia;
3. Compare patients’ insight with family members’insight.
METHODS
Sample: 40patientsand40respectivefam-ilymemberswereselectedfromadmissionsto the Schizophrenia Project Outpatient Clinic (Projesq)oftheInstituteofPsychiatry,Faculdade deMedicinadaUniversidadedeSãoPaulo,be-tweenJanuary2000andDecember2000.
Theinclusioncriteriawere:
1. Diagnosisofschizophreniaaccordingto thecriteriaoftheDiagnosticandStatisti-calManualofMentalDisorders,Fourth Edition(DSM-IV).46
2. Agebetween18and55years.
3. Availabilityoffamilymemberstoaccom-panythepatientstotheinterviewandfor applicationofthescale.
4. TolivetheSãoPaulometropolitanarea. 5. SigningoftheInformedConsentForm. Patients who could not be interviewed becauseofmutism,negativismorpsychomo-toragitationwereexcluded.
InterviewandInstrument
Theinterviewswerecarriedoutbyone psychiatrist(thefirstauthor).Demographic andclinicaldataweregatheredandthediag- nosticinclusioncriteriawereassessedaccord-ingtotheDSM-IVcriteria.Theevaluationof insightwascarriedoutusingtheSAI,foreach participant(patientandfamilymember)sepa-rately.Thescalewasatranslationofthescale developedbyDavid43andvalidatedin1997.44 Theauthorsofthepresentstudyadaptedthe scaletobeappliedtofamilymembersofthe patients (Appendix 1).The interviews were carriedoutoverfivemonths,betweenFebru-ary6,2001,andJuly10,2001,atProjesq. Patientsandfamilymemberswereinterviewed onthesamedays,exceptintwocasesinwhich therewereintervalsof36and78days.
The SAI comprises three subscales that measuredistinctcomponentsofinsight,namely adherencetotreatment,recognitionofillness andabilitytorelabelpsychoticphenomenaas abnormal.Thesumofthescoresofthesub-scalesyieldsatotalscoreofupto14points.At theendofthescalethereisasupplementary question(hypotheticalcontradiction)thatcan addupto4pointstothetotalscore,whichthen wouldreach18points.Thecalculationsshowed intheresultssectionweremadewithoutthe supplementaryquestion.
Six demographic variables were recorded forpatientsandfamilymembers:gender,age, ethnicity,maritalstatus,religionandnumberof yearsofeducation.Eightclinicalvariableswere recordedforpatientsonly.Thesewerepresence, numberanddurationofprevioushospitaliza- tions,durationofillness,associatedpsychologi-caltreatment,familyhistoryofschizophrenia, suicideattemptsandageatonsetofillness.
Student’sttestwasusedtocomparemeans betweenthetwogroups.Thechi-squaredtest wasusedtocomparecategoryvariables,and correlationswereperformedusingtheSpear-mancorrelationtest.
Thisprojectwasreviewedandapproved bytheethicsreviewcommitteeoftheInstitute ofPsychiatry,FacultyofMedicine,Universi-dadedeSãoPaulo.
RESULTS
The demographic and clinical charac-teristics of the two groups are presented in Table1.Onepatienthadbeenadmittedto thepsychiatrichospitalandtheother39were underoutpatienttreatmentatthetimeofthe interview. Regarding antipsychotic medica-tion,30patientshadnochangeduringthe
monthprecedingtheinterview,9hadthedos-Table2.Meanand95%confidenceintervaloftotalandpartialscoresforthe ScheduleforAssessmentofInsightin40patientswithschizophreniaand
40familymembersinapsychiatricserviceinSãoPaulo
Patients Familymembers t p
Adherence(95%CI) 3.4(3.0–3.7) 3.9(3.8–4.0) -2.95 p<0.005
Recognitionofillness(95%CI) 3.5(2.8–4.2) 5.5(5.2–5.8) -5.57 p<0.001
Relabelingofpsychotic
phenomena(95%CI) 1.9(1.3–2.4) 3.6(3.2–3.9) -5.27 p<0.001 Total(95%CI) 8.75(7.5–9.9) 13(12.4–13.6) -6.29 p<0.001
Note:Maximumscoresforadherenceandrelabelingofpsychoticphenomena=4,andforrecognitionofillness=6. CI=confidenceinterval.
Table3.Correlationofthecomponentsofinsightbetween40patientswithschizophre-niaand40familymembers(SpearmanRhotest)inapsychiatricserviceinSãoPaulo
Adherence
(P) Recognitionofillness(P) Relabelingofpsychotic phenomena(P)
Total(P)
Adherence(F)
Recognitionofillness(F)
Relabelingofpsychotic phenomena(F)
Total(F)
0.410
0.214
0.289
0.288
0.278
0.422
0.203
0.407
0.299
0.375*
-0.14
0.248
0.365*
0.479
0.163
0.401*
Note:(F)=familymembers,(P)=patients,*p<0.05, p<0.01. ageincreased,andonehadagradualchange fromrisperidonetoclozapine.
Insight among the patients was not relatedtothedemographicvariablesofage, gender and number of years of education, or to the clinical variables of age at onset of illness, duration of illness, number and durationofhospitalizations,suicideattempts (n=12),previoushospitalization(n=26), or family history of schizophrenia (n = 20).Thepatientswhohadthemedication changed during the preceding month (n = 11)didnotpresentsignificantdifferencesin insightintotheirillness,comparedwiththose whodidnothaveitchanged.Thesubgroup of patients who were under psychological treatment(n=5)hadbetterinsightintothe illness(t=-3.64;p=0.004).
ThemeanSAIscorewas8.75(95%CI: 7.52to9.98)forthepatientsand13.0(95% CI:12.42to13.58)forthefamilymembers. Thehistogramsofscoresforthetwogroups are shown in Figure 1. Family members performedbetterinthetotalandpartialSAI scores,asshowninTable2.However,when the scores were correlated for each patient-familymemberpair,theonlypartialscorethat hadanegativecorrelationwastherelabeling ofpsychoticphenomena(Table3).
DISCUSSION
Thelackofrelationshipbetweeninsight andthedemographicvariablesofage,sexand numberofyearsofeducationisinagreement withmanypreviousstudies.12,18,21,47However, thisfindingisnotunanimous.Theremightbe betterinsightamongmalepatients5andamong patientswithahighereducationallevel.48
Moststudieshavenotfoundassociations betweeninsightandvariablessuchasageof onsetofillness,durationofillnessandnumber ofhospitalizationsoverlifetime.18,21,49Others, however, have found better insight among patientswithmorehospitalizations,50longer duration of illness48 and lower age at onset ofillness.44
Thefactthatpatientsunderpsychological treatmenthadabetterinsightintotheillness couldbeduetothepsychoeducationprovidedby psychotherapy.Anotherexplanationcouldbethe reductioninthedenialoftheillnessthatwould playaroleininsightimpairment.Theremay alsobeabias,becausepatientswithbetterinsight wouldbemoreamenabletopsychotherapy.
patients in the ability to relabelpsychotic phenomena as abnormal can possibly be understood as the effect of stronger influ-ence of cultural factors on the first two components of insight, namely adherence totreatmentandrecognitionofillness.On theotherhand,therelabelingofpsychotic phenomena may be more influenced by psychopathology.This has also been sug-gested by Johnson and Orrell.30 Neverthe-less, alternative explanations for this exist. The presence of schizoid personality traits is more common among family members ofpsychoticpatients,andpeoplewiththese traits could have more difficulty in identi-fying some symptoms of schizophrenia as such,becausesuchsymptomsmayresemble theseindividuals’traits.51Inaddition,family membersofpsychoticpatientsalsopresent more neuropsychological alterations than docontrolsubjects.52Thepresenceofsuch psychopathologicalandneuropsychological characteristicsamongfamilymemberscould
accountforthegreaterdifficultyinidentify-ingschizophreniasymptomswhentheyare presentinothermembersofthefamily.
We should stress that the adapted scale used for family members did not prove to be a good instrument for this group.The scores obtained exhibited a concentration of high values, with little variation (ceiling effect),whichmadeitimpossibletoproperly discriminatetheinsightshownbythisgroup. Asimilarfindinghasbeenreportedinrelation toanotherscale,theSUMD.42
Limitations
Family members were not assessed for personality traits and neuropsychological deficitsthatcouldhaveinfluencedtheirability torecognizeschizophreniasymptomsamong theirrelatives.Withregardtothepossibilityof generalizingtheresultsfromthisstudy,there wasaselectionbias,consideringthatthesample wasrecruitedwithinaclinicalsetting.Sucha
samplewouldthusbemorepronetohavein-sightintoillnesses,eitherasafactorinfluencing theseekingoftreatment,orasaneffectfromthe treatment.Furtherresearchevaluatingpatients andmembersoftheirfamiliesbeforetheirfirst contactwiththetreatmentsystemcouldavoid suchbias.Specifictoolsandmethodshavebeen developedtoallowthediagnosisofpsychiatric disorderinthegeneralpopulationbylayinter-viewers,i.e.includingboththoseundergoing treatmentandthosewhoarenot.53
CONCLUSION
Sincepatientsandmembersoftheirfami-liessharethesameculturalenvironment,the significantdifferenceregardingtheirinsight can possibly be better explained by disease factors. Different degrees of insight are not equallyinfluencedbydiseaseandsociocultural factors.The recognition of illness seems to bemorestronglyinfluencedbysociocultural factorsthanistheabilitytorelabelpsychotic phenomenaasabnormal.
1. WorldHealthOrganization.ReportoftheInternationalPilot StudyofSchizophrenia.Geneva:WorldHealthOrganization Press;1973.
2. WilsonWH,BanTA,GuyW.Flexiblesystemcriteriainchronic schizophrenia.ComprPsychiatry.1986;27(3):259-65. 3. CarpenterWT, Strauss JS, Bartko JJ. Flexible system for the
diagnosisofschizophrenia:reportfromtheWHOInternational PilotStudyofSchizophrenia.Science.1973;182(118):1275-8. 4. Buchanan A. A two-year prospective study of treatment
compliance in patients with schizophrenia. Psychol Med. 1992;22(3):787-97.
5. CuffelBJ,AlfordJ,FischerEP,OwenRR.Awarenessofillness inschizophreniaandoutpatienttreatmentadherence.JNerv MentDis.1996;184(11):653-9.
6. AmadorXF,StraussDH,YaleS,FlaumMM,EndicottJ,Gor-manJM.Assessmentofinsightinpsychosis.AmJPsychiatry. 1993;150(6):873-9.
7. AmadorXF,FlaumM,AndreasenNC,etal.Awarenessofillness inschizophreniaandschizoaffectiveandmooddisorders.Arch GenPsychiatry.1994;51(10):826-36.
8. Lysaker PH, Bell MD, Bryson GJ, Kaplan E. Insight and interpersonal function in schizophrenia. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1998;186(7):432-6.
9. HeinrichsDW,CohenBP,CarpenterWT.Earlyinsightandthe managementofschizophrenicdecompensation.JNervMent Dis.1985;173(3):133-8.
10. DrakeRJ,HaleyCJ,AkhtarS,LewisSW.Causesandconse-quencesofdurationofuntreatedpsychosisinschizophrenia.Br
JPsychiatry.2000;177:511-5.
11. McEvoyJP,FreterS,MerrittM,AppersonLJ.Insightabout psychosisamongoutpatientswithschizophrenia.HospCom-munityPsychiatry.1993;44(9):883-4.
12. CuestaMJ,PeraltaV.Lackofinsightinschizophrenia.Schizophr Bull.1994;20(2):359-66.
13. DavidA,BuchananA,ReedA,AlmeidaO.Theassessmentof insightinpsychosis.BrJPsychiatry.1992;161:599-602. 14. MintzAR,DobsonKS,RomneyDM.Insightinschizophrenia:
ameta-analysis.SchizophrRes.2003;61(1):75-88. 15. MooreO,CassidyE,CarrA,O’CallaghanE.Unawarenessof
illnessanditsrelationshipwithdepressionandself-deception inschizophrenia.EurPsychiatry.1999;14(5):264-9. 16.
AmadorXF,FriedmanJH,KasapisC,YaleSA,FlaumM,Gor-manJM.Suicidalbehaviorinschizophreniaanditsrelationship toawarenessofillness.AmJPsychiatry.1996;153(9):1185-8. 17. KimCH,JayathilakeK,MeltzerHY.Hopelessness,neurocog-nitivefunction,andinsightinschizophrenia:relationshipto suicidalbehavior.SchizophrRes.2003;60(1):71-80. 18. YenCF,YehML,ChenCS,ChungHH.Predictivevalueof
insightforsuicide,violence,hospitalization,andsocialadjust-mentforoutpatientswithschizophrenia:aprospectivestudy. ComprPsychiatry.2002;43(6):443-7.
19. KempR,DavidA.Psychologicalpredictorsofinsightandcompli-anceinpsychoticpatients.BrJPsychiatry.1996;169(4):444-50. 20.
FlashmanLA,McAllisterTW,AndreasenNC,SaykinAJ.Small-erbrainsizeassociatedwithunawarenessofillnessinpatients withschizophrenia.AmJPsychiatry.2000;157(7):1167-9.
21. LaroiF,FannemelM,RonnemberU,etal.Unawarenessofill-nessinchronicschizophreniaanditsrelationshiptostructural brain measures and neuropsychological tests. Psychiatry Res. 2000;100(1):49-58.
22. Startup M. Insight and cognitive deficits in schizophre-nia: evidence for a curvilinear relationship. Psychol Med. 1996;26(6):1277-81.
23. LysakerPH,LancasterRS,DavisLW,ClementsCA.Patterns ofneurocognitivedeficitsandunawarenessofillnessinschizo-phrenia.JNervMentDis.2003;191(1):38-44.
24. McGlashanTH,LevyST,CarpenterWT.Integrationandsealing over.Clinicallydistinctrecoverystylesfromschizophrenia.Arch GenPsychiatry.1975;32(10):1269-72.
25. Dittmann J, Schuttler R. Disease consciousness and coping strategiesofpatientswithschizophrenicpsychosis.ActaPsychiatr Scand.1990;82(4):318-22.
26. FabregaH.Onthesignificanceofananthropologicalapproach toschizophrenia.Psychiatry.1989;52(1):45-65.
27. SalokangasRK.Livingsituation,socialnetworkandoutcome inschizophrenia:afive-yearprospectivefollow-upstudy.Acta PsychiatrScand.1997;96(6):459-68.
28. RedkoC.Cultura,esquizofreniaeexperiência.In:Shirakawa I,ChavesAC,MariJJ,editors.Odesafiodaesquizofrenia.São Paulo:LemosEditorial;1998.p.221-42.
29. KirmayerLJ,CorinE.Insideknowledge–culturalconstruction ofinsightinpsychosis.In:AmadorXF,DavidAS,editors.In-sightandPsychosis.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress;1998. p.193-220.
PUBLISHINGINFORMATION
AlexandreDuarteGigante,MD,MSc.StaffPsychiatrist oftheDepartmentofPsychiatry,FaculdadedeMedicina dePresidentePrudente,UniversidadedoOestePaulista, PresidentePrudente,SãoPaulo,Brazil.
Saulo Castel, MD, PhD.Assistant Professor of the Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto. Staff Psychiatrist of the Institute of Psychiatry (on sabbatical), FaculdadedeMedicinadaUniversidadedeSãoPaulo, SãoPaulo,Brazil.
Sources of funding:SauloCastelwassupportedbya scholarship from the Associacão Fundo de Incentivo a Psicofarmacologia(AFIP),DepartamentodePsicobiologia, UniversidadeFederaldeSãoPauloandfromtheCanadian InstitutesofHealthResearch.
Conflictofinterest:Noconflictsofinterestheldbythe authors.
Dateoffirstsubmission:August27,2003 Lastreceived:September23,2004 Accepted:September27,2004
Addressforcorrespondence: AlexandreDuarteGigante
R.JoséLeviGuedes,290—JardimdasRosas PresidentePrudente(SP)—Brasil—CEP19060-260 Tel./Fax(+5518)223-3203/223-2664/9772-7710 E-mail:agigante@stetnet.com.br
COPYRIGHT©2004,AssociaçãoPaulistadeMedicina
A crítica da doença na esquizofrenia: estudo comparativoentrepacientesefamiliares
CONTEXTO: A despeito do reconhecimento daimportânciadefatoressocioculturaisna críticadadoença,aliteraturarecentesobre essetemaéescassa.
OBJETIVOS:1)traduzireadaptaroSchedule for Assessment of Insight (SAI) para a línguaportuguesa;2)utilizarumaversão modificadadesteinstrumentoparaavaliara críticadosfamiliaresemrelaçãoàesquizo-frenia;3)compararacríticadospacientes comadeseusfamiliares.
TIPODEESTUDO:Estudotransversal
LOCALDOESTUDO:AmbulatóriodoProjeto Esquizofrenia do Instituto de Psiquiatria do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (Projesq).
MÉTODOS: 40 pacientes com diagnóstico de esquizofrenia(ManualDiagnósticoeEstatís-ticodeTranstornosMentais–Quartaedição – DSM-IV) em tratamento ambulatorial e seusrespectivosfamiliaresforamentrevista-dospelaSAIeporumaversãomodificada desteinstrumentorespectivamente.
RESULTADOS: Osfamiliaresapresentaramme-lhores notas que os pacientes nas avaliações parciaisetotaldaSAI[total13,0e8,75(p<
0,001);aderência3,9e3,4(p<0,005);reco-nhecimentodadoença5,5e3,5(p<0,001); reconhecimento dos fenômenos psicóticos 3,6e1,9(p<0,001)].Noentanto,quando asnotasforamcorrelacionadasentrecadapar paciente-familiar,aúnicanotaparcialqueteve umacorrelaçãonegativafoioreconhecimento corretodosfenômenospsicóticos(r=-0,14), enquanto os outros tiveram correlações po-sitivas(totalr=0,401;aderênciar=0,410; reconhecimentodadoençar=0,422).
DISCUSSÃO:Não houve correlação entre as notasdosfamiliaresedospacientesnahabi-lidadedereconhecerossintomaspsicóticos como anormais. Isso pode ser entendido como uma menor influência dos fatores socioculturaisnestadimensão.Apresençade característicaspsicopatológicaseneuropsico-lógicasnosfamiliarespodeterinfluenciado estesresultados.Ofatodeosfamiliaresnão teremsidoavaliadosparaestesdéficitséuma limitaçãodesteestudo.
CONCLUSÃO:Diferentesdimensõesdacrítica dadoençanãosãoigualmenteinfluenciadas peladoençaefatoressocioculturais.Oreco-nhecimento da doença parece sofrer maior influência dos fatores socioculturais que o componente reconhecimento correto dos fenômenospsicóticos.
PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Esquizofrenia.Conscien-tização. Auto-imagem. Relações familiares. Meiosocial.
30. JohnsonS,OrrellM.Insightandpsychosis:asocialperspective. PsycholMed.1995;25(3):515-20.
31. KleinmanA.Theillnessnarratives–suffering,healingandthehu-mancondition.UnitedStatesofAmerica:BasicBooks;1988. 32. KleinmanA.Rethinkingpsychiatry–fromculturalcategoryto
personalexperience.NewYork:TheFreePress;1988. 33. Townsend JM. Cultural conceptions and mental illness. A
controlledcomparisonofGermanyandAmerica.JNervMent Dis.1975;160(6):409-21.
34. PerkinsRE,MoodleyP.Perceptionofproblemsinpsychiatry inpatients:denial,raceandserviceusage.SocPsychiatryPsy-chiatrEpidemiol.1993;28(4):189-93.
35. WhiteR,BebbingtonP,PearsonJ,JohnsonS,EllisD.Thesocial context of insight in schizophrenia. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol.2000;35(11):500-7.
36. BreierA,StraussJS.Theroleofsocialrelationshipsintherecovery frompsychoticdisorders.AmJPsychiatry.1984;141(8):949-55. 37. LaiYM,HongCP,CheeCY.Stigmaofmentalillness.Singapore
MedJ.2001;42(3):111-4.
38. AngermeyerMC,MatschingerH.Relatives’beliefsaboutthecauses ofschizophrenia.ActaPsychiatrScand.1996;93(3):199-204. 39. HolzingerA,KilianR,LindenbachI,PetscheleitA,Angermeyer
MC.Patients’andtheirrelatives’causalexplanationsofschizophre-nia.SocPsychiatryPsychiatrEpidemiol.2003;38(3):155-62. 40.
AngermeyerMC,MatschingerH.Theeffectofpersonalexpe-riencewithmentalillnessontheattitudetowardsindividuals suffering from mental disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol.1996;31(6):321-6.
41. MantonakisJ,MarkidisM,KontaxakisV,LiakosA.Ascalefor detectionofnegativeattitudestowardsmedicationamongrelatives ofschizophrenicpatients.ActaPsychiatrScand.1985;71(2):186-9. 42. Smith CM, Barzman D, Pristach CA. Effect of patient and
familyinsightoncomplianceofschizophrenicpatients.JClin Pharmacol.1997;37(2):147-54.
43.David AS. Insight and psychosis. Br J Psychiatry. 1990;156:798-808.
44. KimY,SakamotoK,KamoT,SakamuraY,MiyaokaH.Insight and clinical correlates in schizophrenia. Compr Psychiatry. 1997;38(2):117-23.
45. Fiss N.Tradução, adaptação e estudo da confiabilidade da versãobrasileirada“Escalaparaavaliaraausênciadenoçãodo transtornomental”–SUMD.[thesis]SãoPaulo:Universidade FederaldeSãoPaulo(Unifesp-EPM);2001.
46. American Psychiatry Association. Diagnostic and Statistical
ManualforMentalDisorders–DSM-IV.4thed.Washington:
AmericanPsychiatryPress;1994.
47. AlmeidaOP,DavidA,LevyR,HowardR.“Insight”eosquadros paranóidesdeiníciotardio.[Insightandlateparaphrenia].Rev
ABP-APAL.1995;17(3):87-92.
48. Macpherson R, Jerrom B, Hughes A. Relationship between insight,educationalbackgroundandcognitioninschizophrenia. BrJPsychiatry.1996;168(6):718-22.
49. McEvoy JP, Apperson LJ, Appelbaum PS, et al. Insight in schizophrenia.Itsrelationshiptoacutepsychopathology.JNerv MentDis.1989;177(1):43-7.
50. PeraltaV,CuestaM.Lackofinsight:itsstatuswithinschizophrenic psychopathology.BiolPsychiatry.1994;36(8):559-61. 51. JohnsLC,vanOsJ.Thecontinuityofpsychoticexperiencesinthe
generalpopulation.ClinPsycholReview.2001;21(8):1125-41. 52. Harris JG, Adler LE, Young DA, et al. Neuropsychological
dysfunction in parents of schizophrenics. Schizophr Res. 1996;20(3):253-60.
53. KesslerRC,McGonagleKA,ZhaoS,etal.Lifetimeand12-monthprevalenceofDSM-III-Rpsychiatricdisordersinthe UnitedStates.ResultsfromtheNationalComorbiditySurvey. ArchGenPsychiatry.1994;51(1):8-19.