• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Int. braz j urol. vol.41 número4

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Int. braz j urol. vol.41 número4"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texto

(1)

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

822

RE: Preoperative serum albumin as a prognostic factor in

patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

_______________________________________________

Ja Hyeon Ku, Myong Kim, Woo Suk Choi, Cheol Kwak, Hyeon Hoe Kim

Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Int Braz J Urol. 2014; 40: 753-62

To the editor,

The publication on “Preoperative serum albumin and upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma” is very interesting (1). Ku et al. reported that “hypoalbuminemia is an independent marker of poor progno-sis in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (1).” Indeed, there are many recent reports confirming the importance of pretherapeutic serum albumin level (1, 2). This parameter can represent that nutritional status of the patient which is an important basic determinant for ability of the body to fight with illness (2). Nevertheless, there are many factors that can affect the serum albumin level.

The good examples are the laboratory interferences and artifacts (such as fibrinogen and heparin) that can alter the serum albumin result (3, 4). In addition, to assess the nutritional status preoperatively, it is suggested not only serum albumin but also other parameters such as hemoglobin has to be con-currently determined and interpreted (5). As noted by Delmore, “the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), including serum parameters, immune competence testing and anthropometrics (6)” is recommended for “predicting postoperative morbidity/mortality and of selecting cancer patients (6)” Finally, there are also other confounding factors that can alter the final outcome results such as the superimposed nosocomial infection during admission, concurrent anemia, etc.

Viroj Wiwanitit, MD, PhD Surin Rajabhat University, Surin, Thailand E-mail: wviroj@yahoo.com

REFERENCES

1. Ku JH, Kim M, Choi WS, Kwak C, Kim HH. Preoperative serum albumin as a prognostic factor in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Int Braz J Urol. 2014;40:753-62. 2. Wu N, Chen G, Hu H, Pang L, Chen Z. Low pretherapeutic

se-rum albumin as a risk factor for poor outcome in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Nutr Cancer. 2015;67:481-5. 3. Hattingh J, Coetzee N, Ross FP. Erroneous densitometric

al-bumin estimation as a result of prestaining with certain dyes. Anal Biochem. 1977;80:635-8.

4. Hallbach J, Hoffmann GE, Guder WG. Overestimation of al-bumin in heparinized plasma. Clin Chem. 1991;37:566-8.

5. Melchior JC. [How to assess preoperative nutritional sta-tus?]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1995;14:19-26.

6. Delmore G. Assessment of nutritional status in cancer patients: widely neglected? Support Care Cancer. 1997;5:376-80.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

In the present study, we compared the incidence of overall complica- tions between a control group of patients who underwent RALP with steep Trendelenburg po- sitioning and a

Conclusions: Levobupivacaine treated group required significantly more intravenous tramadol when compared with paracetamol and lornoxicam groups in patients submit- ted

Our findings have clearly shown that while higher BMI and increased stone attenuation va- lues detected by NCCT were significant factors that influence the final outcome of

Although an increa- sing number of cases on retrograde management of renal calculi in patients with HSK have been reported (15-18), the total number is still rather limited

In this study, computed tomography angiography was performed preoperatively (Fi- gure-1) and provided a map of the renal vascu- lature, renal artery, segmental artery and larger

Additionally, radical nephrectomy is significantly associated with decreasing renal function compared to partial nephrectomy.. These findings highlight the importance of

in their large-scale series consisting of 1311 cases which included various types of surgery (ie. nephrectomy, cystectomy, prostatectomy etc.) reported different levels

The aim of the present study was to com- pare TOS and single-incision sling procedures in terms of their effects on urinary incontinence and the quality of life in overweight