• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Bras. Reumatol. vol.53 número5 en v53n5a14

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Bras. Reumatol. vol.53 número5 en v53n5a14"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texto

(1)

www.reumatologia.com.br

REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE

REUMATOLOGIA

R E V B R A S R E U M A T O L . 2 0 1 3 ;5 3 ( 5 ): 4 4 8 – 4 4 9

Letter to the editors

The use of ustekinumab in refractory treatment of psoriatic

arthritis

Uso de ustequinumabe no tratamento refratário da artrite psoriásica

To the editors:

We had the opportunity of read the review article of Goldenstein-Schainberg et al.1 about the most important

aspects of psoriatic arthritis (PA) over the years. Related to the therapeutic aspects, it is concluded that biologic agents, especially TNF inhibitors (infliximab, etarnecept, adalimumab and golimumab), are used as drugs of last line in refractory cases of the disease. Then, based on ex-isting literature, we show our agreement in this last state-ment.2,3

However, we consider important to mention alternative therapies. In the clinical trial of Griffiths et al., the au-tors studied 900 patients with PA who didn’t respond to treatment with one biologic agent. In order to get a bet-ter clinical response, they compared two biologic agents: ustekinumab – last biologic agent (monoclonal antibody) approved in 2009 – and etanercept. As a result, they found that patients with ustekinumab had a better and faster clinical response, with both dermatological and joint improvement.4 Cuchacovich reported the same

compari-son in 2011 and reassured the findings of Griffiths with ustekinumab.2 Furthermore, in the case report of

Cuchaco-vich, the clinical improvement was demonstrated with the use of the combination of the two biologic agents men-tioned earlier: ustekinumab and etanercept.3 Above all,

to demonstrate the safety of ustekinumab, Cuchacovich reported its use in patients who were refractory to photo-therapy, systemic corticosteroids and biologic therapy (in-cluding TNF inhibitors). The result not only was favorable but also improved the clinical response in the psoriasis area and in the severity index.2

Furthermore, another biologic agent recommended in this review, efalizumab, was withdrawn from the U.S market in June 2009 by the FDA because of potential risk to patients of developing progressive multifocal leukoen-cephalopathy (PML).5 This information is necessary to

em-phasize that this drug should not be recommended as a treatment for skin manifestations in PA patients as it was suggested in the study of Goldenstein-Schainberg et al.1

In fact, PML is known as a serious life-threatening

condi-tion and a devastating neurological disease. It is usually caused by the JC virus but years ago it was emerged as a result of treatment with biologic agents in several rheu-matic diseases.6

In conclusion, ustekinumab should be included in ther-apeutic protocols for PA treatment refractory to biological drugs. It is also important not to encourage the use of efal-izumab for any kind of rheumatic disease. We need more studies to demonstrate the safety of new biological drugs different from ustekinumab.

Karen Vega-Villanueva, Nathaly Cortez-Bazán*, Angela Alvarado-Molina

Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Peru

* Corresponding author.

E-mail: nathaly.cortezb@gmail.com (N. Cortez-Bazán).

© 2013 Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.

R E F E R E N C E S

1. Goldenstein-Schainberg C, SampaioFavarato M, Ranza R. Current and relevant concepts in psoriatic arthritis. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2012;52(1):92-106.

2. Cuchacovich R, Garcia Valladares I, Espinoza L. Comparative assessment of biologics in treatment of psoriasis: drug design and clinical effectiveness of ustekinumab. Drug Des DevelTher. 2011;5:41-9.

3. Cuchacovich R, Garcia Valladares I, Espinoza L. Combination Biologic Treatment of Refractory Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2012;39:187-93.

4. Grifi ths CE, Strober BE, van de Kerkhof P, Ho V, Fidelus-Gort R, Yeilding N, et al. Comparison of Ustekinumab and Etanercept for moderate to severe Psoriasis. N Engl Med. 2010;362(2):118-28.

5. Chappelle R. FDA Statement on the Voluntary Withdrawal of Raptiva From the U.S. Market [internet]; 2009 Apr 4. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/

(2)

449

R E V B R A S R E U M A T O L . 2 0 1 3 ;5 3 ( 5 ): 4 4 8 – 4 4 9

6. Boren EJ, Cheema GS, Naguwa SM, Ansari AA, Gershwin ME. The emergence of progressive multifocal

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Surgical treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is indicated for symptomatic patients who are refractory to optimized drug therapy and who present a left ventricular

Methods: To determine the safety of CMV maintenance therapy withdrawal in patients with immune recovery after HAART, 35 patients with treated CMV retinitis, on maintenance

In addition, in nine cases, MA intralesional therapy was used to treat lesions that were incompletely healed after systemic treatment (five patients) and four patients

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the level of self-reported adherence to physical therapy recommendations in pediatric CF patients and to ascertain

All patients tolerated the treatment and no side effects were reported; a response to treatment was noted in patients who had failed a different intravesical bladder therapy

on the levels of satisfaction and patient safety, in addition to improving adherence to antiretroviral therapy with the use of information and communication technologies to

In a study of patients with CLM who had localized EHD and underwent combined surgical and systemic therapy, disease-free and long-term survival rates were similar to those

The successful use of mycophenolate mofetil in a patient with active birdshot chorio-retinopathy refractory to azathioprine therapy - Case