EVPHROSYNE
R E V I S TA D E F I L O L O G I A C L Á S S I C A
CENTRO DE ESTUDOS CLÁSSICOS
F A C U L D A D E D E L E T R A S D E L I S B O A
MMXV I I
N O V A S É R I E
VOLUME XLV
http://www.letras.ulisboa.pt
ESTE VOLUME DE EVPHROSYNE TEM O APOIO DE:
NOVA SÉRIE
VOL. XLV
MMXV I IE
V
P
H
R
O
S
Y
N
E
ORIENTAÇÕES PARA PREPARAÇÃO DE ORIGINAIS
01. Euphrosyne — Revista de Filologia Clássica, órgão do Centro de Estudos Clássicos da Universidade de Lisboa, está aberta à colaboração da comunidade científica na área da filologia clássica, entendendo esta em sentido largo da diacronia da tradição, das áreas científicas específicas e respectivas disciplinas.
2. Os artigos poderão ser enviados por correio electrónico para centro.classicos@letras.ulisboa.pt ou para a morada do Centro de Estudos Clássicos.
3. Os originais enviados para publicação devem ser inéditos e não estar submetidos a outra entidade editorial; serão remetidos à Direcção de Euphrosyne em forma definitiva e apresentados segundo as normas da revista. Os originais não serão devolvidos, assumindo-se que os autores conservam cópia dos mesmos. Os trabalhos considerados a publi-cação são sujeitos a arbitragem científica.
4. Serão aceites até 31 Janeiro do ano da publicação do volume; será dada informação sobre a aceitação da publicação até 31 de Julho.
5. O original será sempre apresentado electronicamente e em forma dupla: em documento de texto (Word/.doc(x) – pref.) e em PDF.
6. O artigo será encabeçado por: a) título (breve e explícito); b) nome e apelidos do autor; c) instituição académica ou científica a que está adstrito; d) endereço electrónico; e) resumo (não superior a 10 linhas) em língua inglesa; f) indicação de três palavras-chave em língua inglesa.
7. A extensão recomendada para os artigos é de 10 páginas, não devendo ultrapassar 20 páginas de A4, a corpo 12 e duplo espaço.
8. Sistema de notas: fim de artigo (endnotes); numeração automática seguida. Na publicação, as notas de artigo sairão em fundo de página (footnotes).
9. Sistema de referências:
a) Não é permitida remissão para páginas do interior do artigo. b) Referências (em nota):
Monografias: J. de Romilly, La crainte et l’angoisse dans le théâtre d’Eschyle, Paris, 1959, pp. 120-130 (casa editora mencionada apenas para edições antigas). Ou em 2.ª ref.: J. de Romilly, op. cit., p. 78.
Revistas: R. S. Caldwell, “The Misogyny of Eteocles”, Arethusa, 6, 1973, 193-231 (vol., ano, pp.). Ou em 2.ª ref.: R. S. Caldwell, loc. cit.
Obras colectivas: G. Cavallo, “La circolazione dei testi greci nell’Europa dell’Alto Medioevo” in J. Hamesse (ed.),
Rencontres de cultures dans la Philosophie Médiévale – Traductions et traducteurs de l’Antiquité tardive au XIVe
siècle, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1990, pp. 47-64.
c) Abreviaturas: Seguir-se-ão as abreviaturas convencionadas por ThLL, para autores latinos; Liddel-Scott-Jones,
para autores gregos; Année Philologique, para títulos de revistas; para as abreviaturas mais comuns: p. / pp.; ed. / edd.; cf.; s.u.; supra; op. cit.; loc. cit.; uid.; a.C. / d.C. (em redondo).
d) Citações: Devem ser colocadas entre comas “…” (não as de textos gregos); os itálicos serão utilizados apenas para
sublinhar palavras ou pequenas frases; as citações em latim ou em grego serão breves.
10. Eventuais figuras ou imagens serão de qualidade gráfica (de preferência no formato TIF, com a resolução mínima de 200 p.p.), fornecidas em suporte electrónico (como os originais) e com a indicação precisa da referência no texto e na ordem assim como do título (devem ser acautelados os direitos de reprodução por parte do autor do artigo). 11. Aos autores não será fornecido mais do que um jogo de provas; estas deverão ser devolvidas num prazo máximo de
7 dias. Em princípio, não serão permitidas alterações ao original.
12. Aos autores será fornecido um exemplar do volume e a versão electrónica do respectivo artigo.
E V P H R O S Y N E
R E V I S T A D E F I L O L O G I A C L Á S S I C A
Centro de Estudos Clássicos - Faculdade de Letras PT - 1600-214 LISBOA centro.classicos@letras.ulisboa.pt
E V P H R O S Y N E
R E V I S T A D E F I L O L O G I A C L Á S S I C A*
C E N T R O D E E S T U D O S C L Á S S I C O S F A C U L D A D E D E L E T R A S D E L I S B O A PT - 1600-214 LISBOA PORTUGAL e-mail: centro.classicos@letras.ulisboa.pt sítio electrónico: http://www.tmp.letras.ulisboa.pt/cecdiReCtoRa
maRia CRiStinade CaStRo-maiade SouSa Pimentel
ComiSSãode RedaCção
abeldo naSCimento Pena, ana maRia SanChez taRRío, aRnaldo monteiRodo eSPíRito Santo, beRnaRdo maChado mota, JoSé PedRo Silva SantoS
SeRRa, manuel JoSéde SouSa baRboSa, Paulo FaRmhouSe albeRto, RodRiGo CoRReia FuRtado, vanda maRia Coutinho GaRRido anaStáCio
ConSelho CientíFiCo
aiReS auGuStodo naSCimento (U. Lisboa), CaRlo Santini (U. Perugia), CaRmen CodoñeR meRino (U. Salamanca), emilio SuáRezde la toRRe (U. Pompeu Fabra), Joël thomaS (U. Perpignan), JoSé manuel díazde buStamante (U. Santiago de Compostela), manuel
alexandRe JúnioR (U. Lisboa), maRC mayeRy olivé (U. Barcelona), Paolo Fedeli (U. Bari), thomaS eaRle (U. Oxford)
ConSelhode aRbitRaGem CientíFiCa
albeRto beRnabé PaJaReS (u. Complutense de Madrid), amílCaR GueRRa (U. Lisboa), ánGel uRbán FeRnández (U. Córdoba), antónio
PedRo meSquita (U. Lisboa), antónio SeRRano Cueto (U. Cádiz), aRSenio FeRRaCeS RodRíGuez (U. Coruña), auRelio PéRez Jiménez
(u. Málaga), CaRloS levy (U. Sorbonne), CaRmen CaRdellede haRtmann (U. Zürich), CaRmen moRenilla talenS (U. Valencia), ChaRleS
delattRe (U. Lille 3), CiRo monteleone (U. Bari), CRiStóbal maCíaS villaloboS (U. Málaga), diRk SaCRé (KU Leuven), eliSabetta
todiSCo (U. Bari), eSteban CaldeRón doRda (U. Murcia), euStaquio SánChez SaloR (U. Extremadura), Fabio Stok (U. Roma II – Tor Vergata), FRanCiSCo GaRCía JuRado (U. Complutense de Madrid), FRanCiSCo molina aRtaloytia (uned), GabRiela maRRón (U. Nacional del Sur), GiaComo Comiati (U. Warwick), GReGoRio RodRíGuez heRReRa (U. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria), iñiGo Ruiz aRzalluz
(U. País Vasco), iSabel muRta Pina (CCCm), Jean-louiS ChaRlet (U. Marseille), Joaquín RitoRé PonCe (U. Cádiz), JoRdi PàmiaS maSSana
(u. Autònoma de Barcelona), JoSé auGuSto RamoS (U. Lisboa), JoSé CaRRaCedo FRaGa (U. Santiago de Compostela), JoSé maRía maeStRe
maeStRe (U. Cádiz), laRa niColini (U. Genova), luCa GRaveRini (U. Siena), luíS SaRaiva (U. Lisboa), manuel enRique vázquez buJán
(U. Santiago de Compostela), manuel iGnaCio RodRíGuez alFaGeme (U. Complutense de Madrid), manuel SánChez oRtizde landaluCe
(U. Cádiz), maRiado Céu Fialho (U. Coimbra), maRiade Fátima SouSae Silva (U. Coimbra), maRía violeta PéRez CuStodio (U. Cádiz), maRta González González (U. Málaga), maRta váRzeaS (U. Porto), maSSimo GioSeFFi (U. Milano), miGuel ánGel González manJaRRéS
(U. Valladolid), mineRva alGanza Roldán (U. Granada), naiRde nazaRé CaStRo SoaReS (U. Coimbra), nuno SimõeS RodRiGueS
(U. Lisboa), PeteR wiSeman (U. Exeter), PhiliP haRdie (U. Cambridge), Rhiannon aSh (Merton College), RobeRto CRiStoFoli (U. Perugia), RoGeR GReen (U. Glasgow), RoSSana GuGlielmetti (U. Milano), SandRa RamoS maldonado (U. Cádiz), SantiaGo loPez moReda
(U. Extremadura), viRGínia SoaReS PeReiRa (U. Minho) Tiragem 500 exemplares Depósito legal 178089/02
ISSN 0870-0133
PubliCação anual SuJeita a aRbitRaGem CientíFiCa ReFeRenCiadaem
l’année PhiloloGique| aRtSand humanitieS Citation index| ANVUR | biblioGRaPhieinteR -nationaledel’humaniSmeetdela RenaiSSanCe| CSa linGuiStiCSand lanGuaGe behavioR
CENTRO DE ESTUDOS CLÁSSICOS
F A C U L D A D E D E L E T R A S D E L I S B O AEVPHROSYNE
R E V I S TA D E F I L O L O G I A C L Á S S I C A
MMXVII
LIBRI RECENSITI
641
by establishing a corpus and then contextualizes important Greek writers such as Dio and Josephus. Michael Dewar’s valuable outline of lost literature (pp. 469-483) takes into con-sideration a usually neglected array of texts. The concluding part of the Companion, the sixth, is devoted to “Reception”, and Andrew Zissos is the author of all three of its chapters. The fi rst, “The Flavian Legacy” (pp. 487-514), investigates, as its fi rst heading formulates, “The dynasty through the ages” (p. 487): how it was assessed from the end of Antiquity until the present. Zissos then delves into the reception of “Vesuvius and Pompeii” (pp. 515-534), from the Plinii to contemporary literature. The last study presents a synopsis of the “Reception of Flavian Literature” (pp. 535-559). Finally, for their convenience, the four appendices deserve to be mentioned. They provide the reader with: a chronology of events from the year 9 CE to 112 (pp. 560-564); demographic, economic, and military estimates (pp. 565-567, including references for further reading); the “Flavian Legionary Disposi-tions” (pp. 568-569); the Lex de Imperio Vespasiani in translation (accompanied by notes and the Latin text) (pp. 570-572); a “Glossary of Terms and Expressions” (pp. 573-590).
ANA LÓIO Centro de Estudos Clássicos da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa amarialoio@gmail.com
W. J. D
OMINIK, C. E. N
EWLANDS, K. G
ERVAIS(edd.), Brill’s Companion to Statius,
Leiden/ Boston, Brill, 2015.
XIX+702 pp. ISBN 978-90-04-21789-8
William Dominik, Carole Newlands, and Kyle Gervais present a monumental volume devoted to Statius’ poetry, offering a very wide range of perspectives in more than thirty chapters amounting to seven hundred pages. It will certainly become a standard reference publication not just in Statian, but also in Flavian studies. The brilliant array of scholars who have contributed to the volume ensures its high quality.
This is not the place to engage with the individual fi ndings of the thirty-four chap-ters, but an overview of their approaches will provide at least a fi rst picture of the
Compan-ion. The book is divided into seven parts of varying extension and scope: they range from
specifi c topics such as “Transgressive Poetics” (part 4) to broad themes such as “Recep-tion” (part 7). The Silvae are given attention in several chapters, but they are not accorded a section of their own, as the Thebaid and the Achilleid are; I found this surprising.
The editors, in their introductory chapter “Reading Statius” (pp. 3-27), call atten-tion to the original and experimental character of the Statian poems, offer a survey of the critical reception of Statius (trends, currents, polemics, scholars, main works), and fi nally addresses the issue of the impact of Statius’ poems. This status quaestionis provides the reader with a most useful framework for approaching the volume as a whole.
Appropriately, the fi rst section after the introduction is devoted to “Beginnings” (pp. 31-87). K. Sara Myers analyzes Statius’ “interest in experimenting with traditional forms of invocation and inspiration to express his own originality” (p. 31) in the chapter “Statius on Invocation and Inspiration” (pp. 31-53). Gianpiero Rosati’s study, “The Silvae: Poetics of Impromptu and Cultural Consumption” (pp. 54-72), fi nds in Statius’ fi rst preface to the Silvae the traces of the double nature of the poem and of its ambiguous literary genre. He clarifi es that “The problem that he [Statius] faces is elaborating a poetics for occasional poetry, which is not limited to the epigram (…), but includes more complex, ambitious forms like his Silvae (…)” (p. 71). “The Beginnings of the Achilleid” (pp. 73-87) are Randall T. Ganiban’s theme. He delves into Statius’ manipulation of start-ing points, includstart-ing the attempts by characters of the Achilleid “to (in some sense) get the epic started” (p. 73) and the impact of those forays on Achilles’ identity and story (p. 73).
Part 3 covers a much wider subject, “Social and Cultural Matters”. In “Creating the Distinguished Addressee: Literary Patronage in the Works of Statius” (pp. 91-105), Meike
642
LIBRI RECENSITIRüehl proposes to stress “the social and cultural importance” of the poems of Statius through an overview and an assessment of the current state of the research (p. 91). Neil Coffee’s chapter, “Gift and Society in the Works of Statius” (pp. 106-122), explores “Statius’ main contribution to Roman gift discourse, a broader ideal of gift exchange with pleasure at its heart” (p. 108). Bruce Gibson inspects “Negative Stereotypes of Wealth in the Works of Statius” (pp. 123-138). His point of departure is Statius’ location amongst those guilty of avarice in Dante’s Purgatorio; he addresses Statius’ need to handle on the one hand rich friends, and on the other “literary and moral traditions of hostility towards wealth” (p. 137). Neil W. Bernstein’s contribution, “Family and Kinship in the Works of Statius” (pp. 139-154), investigates “the aesthetic and ideological purposes of the discourse of kinship in the poetry of Statius” (p. 139).
The fourth part studies “transgressive poetics” in the Achilleid. Peter J. Davis weighs the generic complexity and the paradoxical nature of the Achilleid (“Statius’ Achilleid: The Paradoxical Epic”, pp. 157-172), Christopher Chinn evaluates Statius’ descriptive technique (“Intertext, Metapoetry, and Visuality in the Achilleid”, pp. 173-188), and Charles McNelis, in the chapter “Similes and Gender in the Achilleid” (pp. 189-204), focuses on two similes within the epic to fi nd out how they “anticipate and outline the treatment of Achilles’ gender through the poem” (p. 189).
Part 5 is dedicated to “Confl ict, Power, and Death in the Thebaid”. In chapter 12, “‘War Came in Disarray…’ (Thebaid 7.616): Statius and the Depiction of Battle” (pp. 207-220), Rhiannon Ash studies how Statius builds his battle scenes in the Thebaid, in expectation of a readership acquainted with both the epic and the historiographic traditions, as well as how these fi t the cultural context of Domitian’s Rome (p. 207). Kyle Gervais examines the destruction of parent-child bonds (in the tales of Linus and Coroebus and of the massacre at Lemnos), and stresses the relevance of this perspective for reading the end of the Thebaid, in which Statius poses as his epic’s own father (“Parent-Child Confl ict in the Thebaid”, pp. 221-239). Frederick Ahl places in the Roman tradition of the myth of Oedipus his refutation of Wilamowitz’ and Ogilvie’s theories that connections between the myth of Thebes and the poet’s contemporary world are “unthinkable” (“Transgressing Boundaries of the Unthinkable: Sophocles, Ovid, Vergil, Seneca, and Homer Refracted in Statius’ Thebaid”, pp. 240-265). In the next chapter, “Similes and Their Programmatic Role in the Thebaid”, William J. Dominik contradicts the idea of some modern scholars that Statius’ similes are “devoid of purpose, decorative, lacking in variety, overlong, and over-numerous” (p. 267). Cecilia Criado proposes an inquiry into “The Constitutional Status of Euripidean and Statian Theseus: Some Aspects of the Criticism of Absolute Power in the
Thebaid” (pp. 291-306). Her examination of the Athenian intervention in book 12
encom-passes a dialogue with Federica Bessone’s reading of the episode. Jessica S. Dietrich con-cludes this part of the volume with an investigation of the fi gure of Jocasta. Statius “plays with contradictory traditions on Jocasta’s death” (p. 307), she argues, and that character and Laius’ have similar roles by being among both the dead and the living (“Dead Woman Walking: Jocasta in the Thebaid”, pp. 307-321).
Part 6, “Predecessors and Contemporaries”, opens with Laura Micozzi’s chapter “Statius’ Epic Poetry: A Challenge to the Literary Past” (pp. 325-342). Micozzi calls atten-tion to the “literary memory of Statius’ characters and to his experiments with rupture from and continuity with his models” (p. 329). Agis Marinis’ focus is on “Statius’ Thebaid and Greek Tragedy: The Legacy of Thebes” (pp. 343-361). In his examination of Greek tragedy’s infl uence on the Thebaid, he looks especially at the depiction of the leaders of the attacking army in the catalogue of book IV, while he holds it paramount to take into account “the relative standing of the brothers, a topic central to the epic” (p. 344). Victoria E. Pagán demonstrates that “a hitherto unnoticed allusion to the Georgics in the proem suggests that (…) the Georgics may also have inspired not only the end but the entire enterprise of the Thebaid” (p. 362), an idea that she carefully examines in “Georgics 2.497 and Thebaid 1.19-20: Allusion and Inspiration” (pp. 362-376). Antony Augoustakis inspects
LIBRI RECENSITI
643
how the scene of necromancy in Thebaid 4 relates to similar scenes in Oedipus and how Tydaeus’ cannibalism in Thebaid 8 alludes to Thyestes (“Statius and Senecan Drama”, pp. 377-392). Paul Roche traces the infl uence of “Lucan’s De Bello Civili in the Thebaid” (pp. 393-407), specifi cally in his “heroes and their Lucanian models; power and its tenure in the Rome of the De Bello Civili and Statius’ Thebes; and the treatment of war, its after-math, and their paradoxes” (p. 395). Statius’ engagement with Valerius Flaccus is Helen Lovatt’s theme (“Following after Valerius: Argonautic Imagery in the Thebaid”, pp. 408-424). She concentrates on two similes of book 8 as a point of departure for a wider consid-eration of Statius’ interpretation and use of the myth of the Argonauts, and of its relevance to his “literary self-positioning” (p. 408) and to the Thebaid’s structure. François Ripoll surveys Statius’ reading of another Flavian epicist, Silius Italicus. In “Statius and Silius Italicus” (pp. 425-443) Ripoll takes into account the three Statian works and considers all the aspects of this “classical” discussion (personal relationship between the poets, rela-tive dating, imitation and borrowing, p. 425). Luke Roman’s chapter, “Statius and Martial: Post-vatic Self-fashioning in Flavian Rome” (pp. 444-461), investigates the persona of the client-poet in Martial and the Silvae as a “literary construct” (p. 446).
The fi nal part of the book, “Reception” (pp. 465-611), might have been published as a monograph of its own. It fully meets the objectives of the editors, namely “to offer a historical perspective on the vagaries of (Statius’) reception from late antiquity onwards” (p. IX), and as such it is the section of the volume which, in my opinion, opens the most
perspectives for the Statian studies. Ruth Parkes (“Reading Statius through a Biographical Lens”, pp. 465-480) demonstrates that different kinds of biographical material about Statius affected the portrayal of the poet and also on how his material was subsequently reworked. She explores this idea by taking into consideration three angles of Statius (Philhelllene, client poet, and epigonal writer, p. 466). “Papinius Noster: Statius in Roman Late Antiquity” (pp. 481-496), by Helen Kaufmann, shows that the poet was read in a variety of ways by poets and scholars from the second half of the fourth century. She suggests that Statius’ neglect by grammarians might explain the separate transmission and the loss of the Silvae at the end of Antiquitiy (p. 481). Robert R. Edwards (“Medi-eval Statius: Belatedness and Authority”, pp. 497-511) investigates the Medi(“Medi-eval reception of Statius, who was deemed an important auctor, and he explores the role of the poems in instruction, vernacular literature, and in the defi nition of the poet’s place within tra-dition (p. 497), among other topics. Peter Heslin scrutinizes Dante’s interpretation of Statius as a Christian to stress that this reveals much of his own Statian hermeneutics and also to suggest an (overlooked) external factor that might have affected that interpreta-tion (“Statius in Dante’s Commedia”, pp. 512-526). With Pramit Chaudhuri we come to the Italian Renaissance. The author’s analysis of the reception of the Thebaid is centred on Capanaeus, who inspired the fi gure of Rodomonte/ Rodamonte in two main vernacular epics, Orlando Innamorato and Orlando Furioso (“The Thebaid in Italian Renaissance Epic: The Case of Capaneus”, pp. 527-542). Valéry Berlincourt shifts the focus to the history of scholarship. The chapter “Early Modern Thebaid: The Latin Commentary Tradi-tion” (pp. 543-561) sheds light on the authors of the commentaries to the Thebaid written in Latin in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and examines their “signifi cance as instances of reception” (p. 545). He also produces an overview of the exegeses of the epic that appeared from the mid-nineteenth century in both Latin and modern languages. “Statian Recusatio: Angelo Poliziano and John Dryden” (pp. 562-578) is Dustin Mengel-koch’s inquiry into the importance of Statius in the Renaissance and the early modern period. He shows in particular how Poliziano and Dryden “defi ne themselves and their views of poetry against the backdrop of Statian recusatio” (p. 578). Susanna Braund concentrates on the work of translation. She investigates what is meant by a “natural” translation when it comes to the Thebaid and discusses the consistency and possi-bility of “naturalizing” that epic (“Naturalizing Statius”, pp. 579-599). The editor Carole E. Newlands fi nishes the volume with the chapter “Statius in an Ideological Climate” (pp. 600-611). She argues that Statius’ “reputation still carries some of the burden of the
644
LIBRI RECENSITIpolitical factionalism of the period of the seventeenth to nineteenth centuries in Europe and the United States” (p. 600). Her study pays particular attention to the Silvae and the
Thebaid, as they are especially relevant for the poet’s current reputation (p. 601).
ANA LÓIO Centro de Estudos Clássicos da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa amarialoio@gmail.com
P
ILARG
ÓMEZC
ARDÓ, D
ELFIMF. L
EÃO, M
ARIAA
PARECIDADEO
LIVEIRAS
ILVA(edd.),
Plutarco entre mundos: visões de Esparta, Atenas e Roma, Imprensa da
Universidade de Coimbra / Annablume Editora, Coimbra, 2014 (Série
Humanitas Supplementum – Estudos Monográfi cos, 32). 273 pp. ISBN
978-989-26-0920-1
Este nuevo volumen publicado por Classica Digitalia ofrece una serie de interesantes estudios en torno a la obra de Plutarco articulados en tres secciones y con la contrapo-sición Esparta/ Atenas/ Roma como trasfondo.
El primer bloque (“1. Esparta, Atenas e Roma. Luz e sombra na caracterização de legisladores e fundadores”) consta de cuatro trabajos en los que los nombres de Licurgo, Solón y Numa ocupan un lugar central, pero en el que también se estudian otros perso-najes a los que Plutarco dio el título de νομοθέτης o de οἰκιστής.
El primer capítulo de este bloque es el de Loraine Oliveira, “O jovem Teseu: do reconhecimento paterno ao reconhecimento político”. La Vida de Teseo es la de un héroe mítico, no un personaje histórico. Plutarco dedica la mayor parte de los capítulos de esta vida al relato de cómo nació y creció Teseo y cómo se fue ganando, a través de haza-ñas que lo igualaban a Heracles, el reconocimiento como héroe. Pero Teseo es sobre todo un héroe político, es el fundador de la democracia ateniense, y ese papel, que va más allá de la herencia paterna, es el que debe ganarse. Este es el hilo conductor del artículo, la búsqueda del reconocimiento paterno y del reconocimiento político. Teseo no funda de la nada una nueva ciudad, como ocurre en el caso de Roma (recuérdese que Teseo forma par con Rómulo) sino que agrupa mediante el sinecismo a quienes ya vivían dispersos e inaugura una nueva forma de vida política; su papel de fundador es algo que lleva inscrito en su propio nombre, relacionado con τίθημι. La autora señala cómo los últimos capítulos de la Vida sugieren que Teseo no supo dar cohesión a su fundación y deja abierta la cues-tión de la comparación entre la monarquía romana y la democracia ateniense, parece que a favor de la primera. En el siguiente capítulo, “Legislar tenía un precio”, Teresa Fau analiza seis de las biografías plutarqueas, Teseo-Rómulo, Licurgo-Numa, Solón-Publícola. Lo que tienen en común es que cuatro de ellos son denominados por Plutarco νομοθέτης, “legisladores” y los otros dos οἰκιστής, “fundadores”. Ambas tareas están muy ligadas entre sí y las dos presentan graves riesgos en forma de exilio (solo en el caso de los protagonistas griegos, curiosamente) y muerte en el peor de los casos, o agresión, incomprensión y calumnia en el mejor. Ese precio que los seis personajes tuvieron que pagar es el que fun-ciona como hilo conductor del artículo, en el que, como se anunciaba en el título con-junto del volumen, se estudian fi guras de los tres mundos, ateniense, espartano y romano. Delfi m Leão, buen conocedor de la fi gura de Solón, analiza al sabio desde la perspectiva de la habilidad, incluso de la astucia (metis) desplegada para alcanzar sus objetivos polí-ticos. En “O legislador e suas estratégias discursivas: teatralidade e linguagem metafórica na Vita Solonis”, se estudian tres episodios de la vida de Solón en relación con los discursos del legislador sobre los mismos: la disputa ateniense por Salamina (y la elegía de Salamina), la liberación de la esclavitud por deudas (y la metáfora de la σεισάχθεια) y la ambivalente relación de Solón con la tiranía de Pisístrato. Finalmente, Ália Rodrigues, en “A fi gura do legislador em Plutarco: Recepção de um mito político”, analiza la relevancia
I
C O M M E N TAT I O N E S
Contributos da Iconografi a Teatral para a análise da imagem no vaso grego – ANA
RITA FIGUEIRA ... 9
Defi nición y contextos de las imágenes de culto en la Grecia antigua – JORGE TOMÁS
GARCÍA ... 25 Tuna Across the Strait of Gibraltar: Traces of a Lost Fishing Myth? – PAMINA
FERNÁNDEZ CAMACHO ... 41 “Odiar” en el Nuevo Testamento (odi, odio sum, odio habeo): traducción y
cons-trucciones con verbo soporte en la Vulgata – JOSÉ MIGUEL BAÑOS & MARÍA
DOLORES JIMÉNEZ LÓPEZ ... 59
Furor impius/ non impia ira. Comparaciones de hombres con leones en la obra
de Blosio Emilio Draconcio – GABRIELA ANDREA MARRÓN ... 79 The See of Dumium/ Braga before and under Visigothic Rule – ALBERTO FERREIRO .... 97
Más sobre la Pasión de San Pelayo – JUAN A. ESTÉVEZ SOLA ... 117
Los Martialis disticha del taller de Juan de Burgos (1490) y la tradición impresa antigua de los Epigramas de Marcial – ANTONIO MORENO HERNÁNDEZ ... 135 La edición incunable de las Comedias de Terencio impresa por Johann Rosenbach
(Barcelona, 1498) – ROSA M. DÍAZ BURILLO ... 161 Terremotos y tsunamis en Portugal en época antigua: el legado de Bernardo de Brito y su Monarchia Lusytana (1597-1609) – MANUEL ÁLVAREZ MARTÍ-AGUILAR ... 183 Scientifi c books and individual curricula among Jesuit Indipetae in Portugal and China (17th-18th cent.) – NOËL GOLVERS ... 205
I I
S T V D I A B R E V I O R A
El primer discurso de mensajero de Ifi genia entre los tauros, una pequeña Ilíada – LORENA JIMÉNEZ JUSTICIA ... 231 El itinerario de los cuerpos en Suplicantes de Eurípides – MARÍA INÉS SARAVIA ... 241
680
RERVM INDEX Cipo-César en las Metamorfosis de Ovidio: ¿una reivindicación de la monarquía? –PABLO MARTÍNEZ ASTORINO ... 259
Vestida con la luminosa y oscura noche del hallazgo de Osiris: algunas consideraciones sobre el manto celeste de Isis en Apul. Met. 11.3-4 – JÓNATAN ORTIZ-GARCÍA ... 271
Two Unnecessary Emendations in Juvencus: scelerata – NEIL ADKIN ... 283
Verbal and situational parallels in Claudian’s De Raptu Proserpinae – MARTYNA PETRY 287 Latin grammar and/ in pedagogy. The two partes grammaticae according to Julian
of Toledo – TIM DENECKER ... 297 Sobre la infl uencia del Liber Esculapii en la compilación de Tereoperica – LAURA
LÓPEZ FIGUEROA ... 305 Acerca de los Comentarii Familiares de Jodoco Badio al Ars poetica de Horacio y a las Saturae de Persio – ALEJANDRO MARTÍNEZ SOBRINO ... 317 La métrique des Odes d’Ercole Strozzi – JEAN-LOUIS CHARLET ... 331 En el taller de Amato. Un escolio sobre la fi ebre y el vino – MIGUEL ÁNGEL GONZÁLEZ
MANJARRÉS ... 341 Fuentes y ejemplos de los Progymnasmata Rhetorica Summam Totius Artis de J.
Tel-gius – M.A ELENA CURBELO TAVÍO ... 353
Fray Alonso de la Veracruz (1507-1584) y su Compendium privilegiorum: estado de la cuestión manuscrita – JOAQUÍN JOSÉ SÁNCHEZ GÁZQUEZ ... 367 A Jesuit Poetic Doctrine: Mambrun’s Dissertatio de epico carmine – MARÍA ASUNCIÓN
SÁNCHEZ MANZANO ... 381
La Palaestra Progymnastica de Adam Gschwend – TRINIDAD ARCOS PEREIRA ... 395 La geografía infernal griega en El reino de Celama de Luis Mateo Díez – JOSÉ VICENTE
BAÑULS ... 409
I I I
D I S P V TAT I O N E S
Santa Teresa de Jesús y los escritores místicos como modelos principales para la falsifi cación en el siglo XVII de las cuatro cartas familiares en castellano
atribuidas a Luisa Sigea – JOSÉ MARÍA MAESTRE MAESTRE ... 427
I V
VA R I A N O S C E N D A
Aproximación al estudio de la presencia del culto de Liber Pater en las provincias romanas danubianas a través de las inscripciones latinas – MARC MAYERI OLIVÉ 517
RERVM INDEX
681
Una posible cristianización del mito de Teseo representada en una cochlear hallada en la Iglesia de San Martín de Dulantzi (Alegría-Dulantzi, Álava) – IsabelVelázquez, MIguel loza & JaVIer NIso ... 539
V
RES COMMEMORANDAE
Aristófanes na Universidade de Lisboa. Uma experiência pedagógica e artística –
sIlVINa PereIra ... 565
VI
LIBRI RECENSITI
a) Edições de texto. Comentários. Traduções. Estudos Linguísticos
MarINa Coray, Homer’s Iliad: The Basel Commentary. Book XIX, translated by
Benjamin W. Millis and Sara Strack, edited by S. Douglas Olson – ruI Carlos
FoNseCa ... 581
ChIara MeCCarIello, Le Hypotheseis Narrative dei Drammi Euripidei. Testo, contesto,
fortuna – NereIda VIllagra ... 582
JordI PàMIas (ed.), Eratosthenes’ Catasterisms. Receptions and Translations – NereIda
VIllagra ... 583
ProPerzIo, Elegie Libro IV. Introduzione di Paolo Fedeli, commento di Paolo Fedeli,
Rosalba Dimundo, Irma Ciccarelli – aNa lóIo ... 586
MaxIMede Tyr, Choix de conférences religion et philosophie. Introduction, traduction
et notes par Brigitte Pérez-Jean et Frédéric Fauquier – ruI MIguel duarTe ... 588
galeNo, Sobre el semen. Sobre el buen estado. Sobre la mejor constitución del cuerpo.
Sobre la sustancia de las facultades naturales. Introducción, traducción, notas
e índices de Pascual Espinosa Espinosa – INMaCulada rodríguez MoreNo ... 591
arseNIo FerraCes rodríguez, Curae quae ex hominibus atque animalibus fiunt.
I. Estudio y edición crítica – laura lóPez FIgueroa ... 593
JuaN gIlde zaMora, Legende Sanctorum et festivitatum aliarum de quibus Ecclesia
sollempnizat = Leyendas de los santos y de otras festividades que celebra la Iglesia, José Carlos Marín Iglesias, Eduardo Otero Pereira (edd.) – MarIa João
CorreIa saNTos ... 595
MarIa heleNada Cruz Coelho, a. M. rIbeIro rebelo (edição crítica, tradução e
comentário filológico), D. Pedro e D. Inês. Diálogos entre o Amor e a Morte. Sermão nas exéquias de D. Inês de Castro de D. João de Cardaillac – arNaldo do esPírITo saNTo ... 596
682
RERVM INDEX ANTÓNIO GUIMARÃES PINTO, Apostilas a António Luís: 1. António Luís e João de Barros;2. António Luís, António Pinheiro e Rodrigo Sanchez. Coordenação editorial e
prefácio de António Manuel Lopes Andrade – MANUEL JOSÉDE SOUSA BARBOSA . 597
SOROR MARIADE MESQUITA PIMENTEL, Memorial da Infância de Cristo e Triunfo do
Divino Amor (Primeira Parte). Organização, notas e estudos introdutórios de
Fabio Mario da Silva – ABEL N. PENA ... 599
BARBARA CASSIN (dir.), Philosopher en langues. Les intraduisibles en traduction – RUI
MIGUEL DUARTE ... 600
b) Literatura. Cultura. História
LOWELL EDMUNDS (ed.), Approaches to Greek Myth – NEREIDA VILLAGRA ... 603
ANA IRIARTE, LUÍSADE NAZARÉ FERREIRA (coords.), Idades e género na literatura e na
arte da Grécia antiga – VALENTINA CARUSO ... 605 J. MICHAEL PADGETT (ed.), The Berlin Painter and His World: Athenian vase-painting in
the early fi fth century B.C. – ANA RITA FIGUEIRA ... 608 R. STONEMAN, K. ERICKSON, I. NETTON (edd.), The Alexander Romance in Persia and
the East – HITESHKUMAR PARMAR ... 611 FRANCESCODE MARTINO, CARMEN MORENILLA (edd.), Teatro y sociedad en la Antiguedad
Clásica. Vol. 63: Personajes secundarios con historia – CARLOS ALBERTO LIZ ... 615
JESSICA HUGHES, CLAUDIO BUONGIOVANNI (edd.), Remembering Parthenope. The
Recep-tion of Classical Naples from Antiquity to the Present – ANA LÓIO ... 617
LUKE ROMAN, Poetic Autonomy in Ancient Rome – ANA LÓIO ... 619 VIRGINIE LEROUX, NICOLETTA PALMIERI, CHRISTINE PIGNÉ (dir.), Le Sommeil: Approches
philosophiques et médicales de l’Antiquité à la Renaissance – CRISTINA SANTOS
PINHEIRO ... 621 PATRÍCIADELOS ÁNGELES GONZÁLEZ GUTIÉRREZ, El vientre controlado. Anticoncepción
y aborto en la sociedad romana – CRISTINA SANTOS PINHEIRO ... 623 LAURENCE GOSSEREZ (dir.), Le Phénix et son autre. Poétique d’un mythe. Des origines
au XVIe siècle – ABEL N. PENA ... 625
GERMÁN SANTANA HENRÍQUEZ (ed.), Fueron felices y comieron perdices. Gastronomia
y literatura – PAULA BARATA DIAS ... 626
DAVID J. COLLINS, S.J. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Magic and Witchcraft in the
RERVM INDEX
683
ALINE CANELLIS, ÉLISABETH GAVOILLE, BENOÎT JEANJEAN (edd.), ‘Caritatis scripta’.
Mélanges de littérature et de patristique offerts à Patrick Laurence – ANDRÉ
FILIPE SIMÕES... 630
JOSÉ MARTÍNEZ GÁZQUEZ, JOHN VICTOR TOLAN (estudos reunidos por), ‘Ritus Infi
lium’. Miradas interconfessionales sobre las práticas religiosas en la Edad Media
– ANDRÉ FILIPE SIMÕES ... 632 CARLOS A. MARTINSDE JESUS, Poesia e Iconografi a. Mito, desporto e imagem nos
epiní-cios de Baquílides – NUNO SIMÕES RODRIGUES ... 635
MATHEUS TREVIZAM, Poesia didática: Virgílio, Ovídio e Lucrécio; MATHEUS TREVIZAM,
Prosa técnica: Catão, Varrão, Vitrúvio e Columela – GABRIEL SILVA... 636 SABINE LUCIANI (éd.), PATRICIA ZUNTOW (collab.), Entre mots et marbre. Les
phoses d’Auguste – MIREILLE ARMISEN-MARCHETTI ... 638 ANDREW ZISSOS (ed.), A Companion to the Flavian Age of Imperial Rome – ANA LÓIO.... 640 W. J. DOMINIK, C. E. NEWLANDS, K. GERVAIS (edd.), Brill’s Companion to Statius – ANA
LÓIO ... 641 PILAR GÓMEZ CARDÓ, DELFIM F. LEÃO, MARIA APARECIDA DE OLIVEIRA SILVA (edd.),
Plutarco entre mundos: visões de Esparta, Atenas e Roma – MARTA GONZÁLEZ
GONZÁLEZ ... 644
GERMÁN SANTANA HENRÍQUEZ (ed.), Plutarco y las Artes. XI Simposio Internacional de
la Sociedad Española de Plutarquistas – JOAQUIM PINHEIRO ... 646 GABRIELA MARRÓN, El rapto de Prosérpina. Un nuevo contexto para la trama épica –
INÊSDE ORNELLASE CASTRO ... 649
COSETTA CADAU, Studies in Colluthus’ Abduction of Helen – FOTINI HADJITTOFI ... 651 FRANCISCO RICO, I venerdì del Petrarca, seguito da Profi lo biografi co del Petrarca in
collaborazione con LUCA MARCOZZI – IÑIGO RUIZ ARZALLUZ ... 653
JOSÉ FÉLIX DUQUE, O Fuso e a Trama. Santa Beatriz da Silva e a Fundação da Ordem
da Imaculada Conceição. Séculos XV e XVI – PAULA BARATA DIAS ... 656 T. F. EARLE, CATARINA FOUTO (edd.), The Reinvention of Theatre in Sixteenth-Century
Europe. Traditions, Texts and Performance – MANUEL JOSÉDE SOUSA BARBOSA ... 658 HILAIRE KALLENDORF (ed.), A Companion to Early Modern Hispanic Theater – MARIA
LUÍSA RESENDE ... 661
DAVID HOPKINS, Conversing with Antiquity: English Poets and the Classics, from
Shakespeare to Pope – RICARDO NOBRE ... 662 GUSTAVO GARCÍA VIVAS, Ronald Syme. El Camino hasta La Revolución Romana
684
RERVM INDEXc) Instrumenta
guIdo basTIaNINI, MIChael haslaM, herwIg Maehler, FraNCo MoNTaNarI, CorNelIa
röMer (edd.), MarCo sTroPPa (adiuvante), Commentaria et lexica graeca in
papyris reperta (CLGP), Pars I: Commentaria et lexica in auctores; vol. 1,
fasc. 2.2: Alexis – Anacreon – eFTyChIa baThrellou ... 665
MaNuel alexaNdre JúNIor, Gramática de Griego: Clásico y helenístico – MarIa José
MeNdese sousa ... 667
reINharT herzog, PeTer lebreChT sChMIdT (ed.), Nouvelle Histoire de la Littérature
Latine, vol. I: La Littérature Latin de L’Époque Archaïque: des origines à la mort de Sylla; la période prélittéraire et l’époque de 240 à 78 av. J.-C., ed. Werner
Suerbaum, ed. francesa dirigida por Gérard Freyburger e François Heim – rICardo Nobre ... 668
C. FabIão, a. guerra, J. alMeIda, r. r. de alMeIda, J. PIMeNTa, V. FIlIPe, Marcas de
ânforas romanas na Lusitânia (do Museu Nacional de Arqueologia de Lisboa ao Museo Nacional de Arte Romano de Mérida) – CaTarINa gasPar ... 670
MarIa adelaIde MIraNda, alICIa MIguélez CaVero (edd.), Portuguese Studies on
Medieval Illuminated Manuscripts – MarCello MosCoNe ... 672
luaNa gIurgeVICh, heNrIque leITão, Clavis Bibliothecarum: Catálogos e Inventários
de Livrarias de Instituições Religiosas em Portugal até 1834 – MarIa luísa
ARTICLE SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
1. Euphrosyne — Revista de Filologia Clássica, the peer journal of the Centre for Classical Studies, publishes papers on classical philology and its disciplines (including classical reception and tradition).
2. Papers can be sent to centro.classicos@letras.ulisboa.pt or to the Centre for Classical Studies’ post mail. 3. Papers submitted: must be original; cannot be yield to other entity; must be sent in their defi nite version; have to be
presented according to these guidelines; will not be returned to the author. Papers will be submitted to peer reviews. 4. Papers will be accepted until 31st of January in the year of the publication; an acceptance notifi cation will be sent to
the author until 31st of July.
5. Originals must always be submitted in double electronic format (Word/.doc(x) and PDF).
6. Papers must have: a) title (short and clear); b) author’s name and surname; c) author’s academic or scientifi c insti-tution; d) author’s email; e) abstract (10 lines) in English; f) three key-words in English.
7. Recommended size is 10 pages and never more than 20 A4 pages (font size 12, double spaced). 8. Notes: endnotes, with sequential numeration. When published, these will be converted to footnotes. 9. References:
a) Remissions to pages within the paper are not allowed. b) Note references:
Books: J. DE ROMILLY, La crainte et l’angoisse dans le théâtre d’Eschyle, Paris, Les Belles Letres, 1959, pp. 120-130;
2nd reference: J. DE ROMILLY, op. cit., p. 78.
Journals: R. S. CALDWELL, “The Misogyny of Eteocles”, Arethusa, 6, 1973, 193-231 (vol., year, pp.). 2nd reference:
R. S. CALDWELL, loc. cit.
Multi-author volumes: G. CAVALLO, “La circolazione dei testi greci nell’Europa dell’Alto Medioevo” in J. Hamesse (ed.), Rencontres de cultures dans la Philosophie Médiévale — Traductions et traducteurs de l’Antiquité tardive
au XIVe siècle, Paris, Les Belles Letres, 1971, pp. 47-64.
c) Abbreviations: to Latin authors will be followed ThLL conventions; Liddel-Scott-Jones will be used to Greek
authors; Année Philologique to abbreviate journal titles; common abbreviations: p. / pp.; ed. / edd.; cf.; s.u.; supra; op. cit.; loc. cit.; uid.; a.C. / d.C. (roman).
d) Quotations: Must be marked by quotes “…” (but not in Greek); italic is used to highlight words or short sentences;
quotations in Latin or Greek must be brief.
10. Images must have quality (preferably in TIF format, minimum resolution 200 p.p.), provided in electronic format, with the precise indication of where they must be placed in the text, and who is their author. The author is responsible for obtaining any copyrights needed.
11. The author will not be provided with more than one set for review, which has to be returned within a week period. Originals cannot be modifi ed.
12. Authors will receive a physical copy of the volume and the electronic version of their paper.
E V P H R O S Y N E
R E V I S T A D E F I L O L O G I A C L Á S S I C A
Centro de Estudos Clássicos - Faculdade de Letras PT - 1600-214 LISBOA
