WAVELET BASED CLASSIFICATION
OF VOLTAGE SAG, SWELL &
TRANSIENTS
Vijay Gajanan Neve*
Assoc. Prof. & HOD of Electrical Engg. Department,
Jagadambha College of Engg. & Tech. YAVATMAL
([email protected])
DR. GAJANAN M. DHOLE
Prof. Electrical Engg. Department,
Shri Sant Gajanan Maharaj
Colleg
e
of Engineering, SHEGAON
( e-mail:[email protected])
Abstract:
When the time localization of the spectral components is needed, the WAVELE TRANSFORM (WT) can be
used to obtain the optimal time frequency representation of the signal. This paper deals with the use of a wavelet
transform to detect and analyze voltage sags, voltage swell and transients. It introduces voltage disturbance
detection approach based on wavelet transform, identifies voltage disturbances, and discriminates the type of
event which has resulted in the voltage disturbance, e.g. either a fault or a capacitor-switching incident.
Feasibility of the proposed disturbance detection approach is demonstrated based on digital time-domain
simulation of a distribution power system using the PSCAD software package, and is implemented using
MATLAB. The developed algorithm has been applied to the 14-buses IEEE system to illustrate its application.
Results are analyzed.
Keywords:
Disturbance detection, Power quality, Voltage Sag, Swell and Transients, Wavelet transform
.
I. Introduction
The both electric utilities and end-users of electric power are becoming increasingly concerned with power
quality. Since the late 1980s the term “power quality” has become the most commonly used buzzword in the
power industry. It covers several types of problems of electricity supply and power system disturbances. Voltage
sags and interruptions, transient overvoltages and harmonics, long-duration voltage variations, wiring and
grounding are all issues related to power quality.
The quality of electrical power supply is widely recognized as one of the most important issues besides the
liberalization of the electricity industry. It is also apparent that too little is known about the quality of existing
power networks. As a result, there are concerted efforts to carry out power quality measurements, not only to
assess the overall quality but also to gather the necessary information for designing improvement measures.
Power quality concerns a subset of electromagnetic phenomena considered under the wider umbrella of
electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), the different phenomena are categorized according to their typical
characteristics of durations, magnitudes, and frequency content. The significance of each category depends on
its impact on other sensitive equipment, which tend to vary from one system to another. Subsequently, the
measurement instruments must be adaptable to cater for the different disturbances. Using data from power
quality studies we examine the variation in power quality at different locations. Our goal is to provide insight on
how much power quality varies by site, what circuit parameters cause the variation,. We focus on the most
common and most problem-causing power quality disturbances—voltage sags, voltage swell and transients
using various power quality indices. Of the many types of power system disturbances that can affect the quality
of supply, voltage sags are known to produce the most devastating impacts on loads. Voltage sags are
characterized by magnitude and duration.
Power system faults cause voltage sag, voltage swell and transients. The frequency of faults depends on many
factors including weather, tree-trimming, and right-of-way maintenance, and age of equipment. The protection
schemes and location of circuit interrupters determine whether a fault causes voltage sag or an interruption, and
the protection system determines the event duration.
power systems are static, power disturbance waveforms are usually nonstationary and are a periodic under some
circumstances.
Electricite de France (EDF) has been interested for several years in the new signal processing tools used to
detect and measure voltage sags and transient overvoltages. The power quality analysis is a major source of
concern for EDF. Detection and measurement of voltage sags and transient overvoltages must be accurate
enough to determine the cause of the disturbances. A reliable identification of the disturbances enables the
utilities to reinforce the power system.
Many power utilities attempt to continuously monitor power quality by recording disturbance waveforms.
However, the analysis of waveforms recorded is currently based on their visual examination, and because of an
enormous amount of data and a lack of sufficient expertise in power utilities, the task of recognition of
disturbance waveforms is still both difficult and time consuming. Therefore, any attempt to identify or classify
power quality disturbances automatically is very important. Recognition of power quality disturbance
waveforms involves a problem of distinguishing one signal from another. In many situations, power utilities
cannot provide sufficient amount of data .The amount of data collected is often very large, Most of the collected
data is often stored in a mass storage system without real-time analysis or until a complaint or a significant
disturbance occurs. It is therefore desired that every incoming waveform be automatically identified and
tabulated into specific disturbance categories. Wavelet transform (WT) is a recent signal processing tool used in
power, quality analysis, provides an understandable transient signal representation corresponding to a
time-frequency plane. This plane gives time and time-frequency related information relating to the analyzed signal.
Therefore, the WT leads to accurate frequency resolution and poor time location at low frequency. Reciprocally,
the WT provides accurate time location and bad frequency resolution at high frequency. This characteristic is
appropriate for real signals such as voltage sags and transient overvoltages. Time-frequency planes are also
meaningful signatures of each kind of disturbances providing time and frequency characteristics. Detecting and
characterizing voltage sags and transients are tested over a set of records representing real disturbances [1].
This paper mainly concentrates on describing the principles of the disturbance detection scheme is evaluated
based on simulation of a large number of faults and capacitor-switching incidents in a power distribution
system. The PSCAD program is used for the simulation studies. This paper is organized as follows. Section II
outlines the Background, Section III describes the System under study, Section IV shows the graphical results
for various cases considered separately and Section V draws the conclusions.
II. Background
To improve power quality with adequate solutions, it is necessary to know what kinds of disturbances
occurred. A measurement system able to automatically detect, characterize, and classify disturbances on
electrical lines is therefore required. Simulation studies have been carried out for single line to ground faults.
Voltage sags is defined as “a decrease to between 0.1 and 0.9 p.u. in rms voltage at the power frequency for a
duration of 0.5 cycle to 1 min” or it may be defined as Voltage sags are power system events that present a
temporary decrease in the rms voltage magnitude in one or more phases. Voltage sags are also called as voltage
dips. They are one of the most concerned power quality disturbances in power systems. voltage sags are
characterized by its magnitude and duration. The magnitude is defined as the percentage of the remaining
voltage during the sag. In this case, the duration of sag is the time between the sag commencement and end. The
magnitude and the duration of voltages sag in use in this paper are the remaining bus voltage during the fault
and the required time to clear the fault by primary protection, respectively. Magnitude and duration are the main
characteristics of voltage sags, and they have been used for the development of the equipment’s compatibility
charts and indices. In addition to these, the other characteristics such as unbalanced voltage sags, phase angle
shifts, the point on the wave of initiation and recovery, and waveform distortion have been found to influence
significantly the equipment’s sensitivity to the voltage sags. A three-phase short circuit or a large motor starting
can produce symmetrical sags whereas single-line-to-ground, phase-to-phase, and two-phase-to-ground faults
can cause asymmetrical sags. The majority of faults in the power systems are the single line-to-ground faults,
and consequently result in the unbalanced voltage sags. The sources for voltage sags are usually system faults,
heavy load switching, and large motor starting. Sags can propagate long distance from the source location and
affect customers in large areas. Over the past many years, research work in voltage sag diagnosis has been
focused on developing protocols and systems to measure the disturbance. Little work has been reported on
locating the origins of voltage sags. With the deregulation of power industry, utilities have become increasingly
interested in quantifying the responsibilities for power quality problems, with voltage sag as the most prominent
concern. As a result, research on how to detect sag source direction has become an important topic recently. In
spite of various efforts, there is still no reliable and technically sound method available for locating sag sources.
voltage sags from the original fault locations to the different customer buses. A voltage dip at the terminals of
equipment may lead to maloperations of the equipment. Most maloperations are associated with voltage dips
due to faults. One of the causes of maloperations is the sudden increase in voltage upon fault clearing.
Voltage dips due to faults are the most severe ones and therefore are of major concern. They cause problems
to a large number of customers as they propagate in the system. The magnitude of fault-induced voltage dips at
a certain point in the system depends mainly on the type and the resistance of the fault, the distance to the fault
and the system configuration. Their duration depends on the type of protection that is used and varies between
less than half a cycle (for a fuse) to a few seconds. Faults are either symmetrical (three-phase or
three-phase-to-ground faults) or nonsymmetrical (single-phase or double-phase or double-phase-to-three-phase-to-ground faults). Depending
on the type of fault, the magnitudes of the voltages of the three phases are equal (symmetrical fault) or unequal
(nonsymmetrical) [2].
Four basic fault types (line-to-ground L-G, line-to-line L-L, ground L-L-G, and
line-to-line-to-line L-L-L) are initiated at every bus in the network. Related voltage sags, caused by these faults, are then
“followed” during the propagation to the particular bus of interest. In this way, a “voltage sag profile” at the bus
of interest is obtained. The voltage sag profile shows the three-phase voltage magnitudes as they occur at the bus
of interest as the consequence of four fault types initiated at all buses in the network. [3].
The characteristics of each disturbance, e.g. a fault, depend on several factors, for example type of the event,
e.g. single-phase-to-ground or phase-to-phase fault, location of the event, time instant of the event, and
network configuration. The basic uncertainty factors recognized in the assessment of voltage sags are as
follows:
a) Fault type: System faults considered in this paper are; three-phase, line, single- and double
line-to-ground faults. The probabilities associated with fault types depend upon the operating voltage, weather
conditions, etc. and can vary from system to system. The probability of occurrence of each of these fault types
should be obtained from actual system data and statistics of fault incidence.
b) Fault location: The resulting severity of a given fault tends to diminish as the distance between the fault
location and the generating buses increases. Faults at generator buses are the most severe faults in the system.
The location of the fault is probabilistic and, therefore, can be represented by a probability distribution of fault
occurrence.
c) Fault impedance: Ground faults on lines usually result from flashover of the insulators due to lightning
induction or failure of the insulators. The current path for ground faults includes the arc, tower impedance and
the impedance between the tower foundation and earth (tower footing resistance). When used, ground wires
provide a parallel path to the earth return. Arcs are resistive in nature, while tower and ground wires are
complex impedances and tower footing impedance is essentially resistive. A typical value of the arc resistance is
1 or 2 ohms. Tower footing resistance at various towers can run from less than 1 to several hundred ohms. With
so many variables, it is quite difficult to represent the fault resistance with any degree of certainty. It is a
common assumption that the fault impedance is totally resistive.
Voltage swell as defined by IEEE Standard 1159-1995, IEEE Recommended Practice for Monitoring Electric
Power Quality, is an
increase in root mean square (RMS) voltage at the power frequency for durations from 0.5
cycles to 1 minute. Typical magnitudes are between 1.1 and 1.8 pu.
As with sags, swells are usually associated with system fault conditions, but they are much less common than
voltage sags. A swell can occur due to a single line-to-ground fault on the system resulting in a temporary
voltage rise on the unfaulted phases. Swells can also be caused by switching off a large load, switching on a
large capacitor bank etc.
Swells are characterized by their magnitude (RMS value) and duration. The severity of a voltage swell during
a fault condition is a function of the fault location, system impedance, and grounding.
The transient is due to the instant of voltage recovery corresponds to the instant of fault clearing. The
non-zero signal before the start of the event is due to the method for extracting the transient being non-ideal. An
appropriate high-pass filter would remove the harmonic distortion but would also remove a significant part of
the transient as its main frequency components are around a few hundred Hertz. Also, the original waveform
and the extracted transients for the three phases are shown.
Wavelet Toolbox™ software extends the MATLAB® technical computing environment with graphical tools
and command-line functions for developing wavelet-based algorithms for the analysis, synthesis, denoising, and
compression of signals and images. Wavelet analysis provides more precise information about signal data than
other signal analysis techniques, such as Fourier. The Wavelet Toolbox supports the interactive exploration of
wavelet properties and applications. It is useful for speech and audio processing, image and video processing,
biomedical imaging, and 1-D and 2-D applications in communications and geophysics The Wavelet transform is
a transform of this type. It provides the time-frequency representation. Wavelet transform is capable of
providing the time and frequency information simultaneously, hence giving a time-frequency representation of
the signal.
The wavelet transforms associated with fast electromagnetic transients are typically non-periodic signals,
which contain both high-frequency oscillations and localized impulses superimposed on the power frequency
and its harmonics. If signals are altered in a localized time instant, the entire frequency spectrum can be
affected. To reduce the effect of non-periodic signals on the DFT, the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) is
used. It assumes local periodicity within a continuously translated time window. Fig.1 illustrates the
implementation procedure of a Discrete WT (DWT), in which S is the original signal; LPF and HPF are the
low-pass and high-low-pass filters respectively. At the first stage an original signal is divided in to two halves of the
frequency bandwidth, and sent to both LPF and HPF. Then the output of LPF is further cut in half of the
frequency bandwidth and then sent to the second stage, this procedure is repeated until the signal is decomposed
to a pre-defined certain level. If the original signal were being sampled at Fs Hz, the highest frequency that the
signal could contain, from Nyquist’s theorem, would be Fs/2 Hz. This frequency would be seen at the output of
the high pass filter, which is the first detail 1, similarly, the band of frequencies between Fs/4 and Fs/8 would be
captured in detail 2, and so on. The sampling frequency in this paper is taken to be 10 kHz and Table 1 shows
the frequency levels of the wavelet function coefficients.
Table 1: Frequency levels of Wavelet Functions Coefficients
Decomposition Level
Frequency Components
D1 5000-2500
D2 2500-1250
D3 1250-625
D4 625-312.5
D5 312.5-156.25
A5 0-156.25
III. System under study
The IEEE Test System was used in the studies reported in this paper. Fig.2 shows 14-bus system is used for
the test example. The system data is given in Appendix A. At each observation location, harmonic and voltage
fluctuation phenomena are considered, System bus voltages are calculated by using the fault calculations
program written using MATLAB. Voltage sag magnitudes at the network buses are calculated for symmetrical
and asymmetrical faults out of these 14 buses, Eight network buses (i.e., buses 4, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14)
are selected arbitrarily as the buses of interest
.
Out of these eight buses, the first six are 11-kV buses whereas the
last two are at the 33-kV level.
The objective is to monitor the voltage at the 9
th
bus and identify voltage disturbances in various four cases
such as, single line to ground fault (solidly grounded), single line to ground fault (resistance grounding with
Rf=10
Ω
),.Sudden load applied & Capacitor switching. The logic is to discriminate between voltage
disturbances due to faults and capacitor-switching incidents. This information may be used to take proper
countermeasures to maintain the bus voltage during system faults within prescribed limits.
The emphasis here is to develop a methodology to incorporate the uncertainty involved with the equipment
sensitivity. Therefore, in order to simplify calculations, in case of the asymmetrical sags Due to space
limitations, results obtained only at affected buses are discussed here [4].
Fig. 2. IEEE 14 Bus System
IV. Results and Discussion
In order to analyze the operation of the proposed computer simulations with power system computer aided
design PSCAD were performed. Power disturbance
Data of 14 Bus System have been recorded. The data were
obtained from a
power system software PSCAD The power circuit is modeled as a three-phase four-wire system
with a nonlinear load, in PSCAD software. The length of each signal is 15000 samples for 0.8 s [6].
calculations, due to space limitations, results obtained only at affected eight buses are shown (i.e. bus No.
4,7,9,10,11,12,13,14). The objective is to monitor the voltage at the 9
th
(select arbitrarily) bus and identify
voltage disturbances in various four cases such as, single line to ground fault (solidly grounded), single line to
ground fault (resistance grounding with Rf=10
Ω
), Sudden load applied & Capacitor switching are as under.
A)
Single line to ground Fault without considering fault resistance i.e solidly grounded
The experimental study has been carried out for a single-phase to ground fault without considering fault
resistance i.e solidly grounded event. Now suppose that a single line to ground fault without considering fault
resistance occurs on bus No. 9 at phase A and is cleared after a period of time.
In all of the investigations reported in this paper, the bus voltage at a faulted phase is zero. Moreover, in the
case of unsymmetrical faults, the voltage sag magnitude is the lowest value of all phases. It gives sample
simulation results of the voltage sag magnitude at selected buses for single line to ground faults on the 9
th
bus. It
can be seen from this Fig. 3-10 that buses near to a fault experience severe voltage sag. The influence of the
distance to the fault on the sag magnitude is demonstrated graphically in Fig. 3-10 for the 14 bus system. As
can be seen, the voltage drops below 90% for a large part of the network. Such a fault thus has the potential to
cause sag-related equipment problems for a large number of customers.. As expected, it can be seen that the
voltage sag is more severe for faults close to the customer bus.. It can be seen from this figure that generator
buses experience lower voltage sags than load buses. It can also be seen that bus 9 experiences the highest
voltage sag as compared to other buses and also we have seen that there will be no any affect on bus no.
1,2,3,5,6,and 8. Fig.3 clearly shows that at bus No. 9 on phase A fault record from a single-phase to ground
without considering fault resistance of three-phase power System,. are the voltage of phase a, b, and c,
respectively, there will more affect, such as sag seen on faulted phase and swell occurs on unfaulted phases i.e.
phase b and phase c. The instant of voltage recovery corresponds to the instant of fault clearing.
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
igna
l
W AVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.2
0 0.2
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.2
-0.10 0.1
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.10
0.1 0.2
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.2
-0.10 0.1
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.2
0 0.2
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -10
1
S
igna
l
W AVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -10
1
S
igna
l
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d5
Fig. 3. At bus No. 9 fault record from a single-phase to ground of three-phase power System,. are the voltage of phase a, b, and c,
respectively. The fault occurred on phase A at Bus No. 9 (Solidly grounded)
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ignal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -50
5 x 10-3
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -50
5 10 15x 10
-3
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ignal
W AVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.5
0 0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -2
-10 1
x 10-3
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -6
-4 -20 2
x 10-3
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.02
0 0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -20
-100 x 10-3
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ignal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -50
5 x 10-3
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -5
0 5
x 10-3
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1 0 1
S
ig
nal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.10
0.1
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
0 0.1
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050.050
0.1
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.10
0.1
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.10
0.1
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1 0 1
S
ig
nal
W AVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020.020.040 0.06
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1 0 1
S
ig
nal
W AVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020.020.040 0.06
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d5
Fig. 5. At bus No. 7 fault record from a single-phase to ground of three-phase power System,. are the voltage of phase a, b, and c,
respectively. The fault occurred on phase A at Bus No. 9 (Solidly grounded)
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ign
al
W AVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.2
-0.10 0.1
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.10
0.1
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.10
0.1 0.2
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.2
-0.10 0.1
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.2
-0.10 0.1
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -10
1
S
ign
al
W AVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -10
1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d5
Fig. 6. At bus No. 10 fault record from a single-phase to ground of three-phase power System,. are the voltage of phase a, b, and c,
respectively. The fault occurred on phase A at Bus No. 9 (Solidly grounded)
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ignal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
0 0.1
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -10
1
S
ignal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02 0.04
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020.020
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -10
1
S
ignal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02 0.04
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d5
Fig. 7. At bus No. 11 fault record from a single-phase to ground of three-phase power System,. are the voltage of phase a, b, and c,
respectively. The fault occurred on phase A at Bus No. 9 (Solidly grounded)
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ignal
W AVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.02
-0.010 0.01
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ignal
W AVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -10-5
0 5x 10
-3
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -50
5x 10
-3
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -20
-100 x 10-3
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020 0.02
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ignal
W AVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -10-5
0 5x 10
-3
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -50
5x 10
-3
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.02
0 0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ig
nal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ig
nal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.01
0 0.01
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.02
-0.010 0.01
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020 0.02
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ig
nal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.01
0 0.01
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.01
0 0.01
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d5
Fig. 9. At bus No. 13 fault record from a single-phase to ground of three-phase power System,. are the voltage of phase a, b, and c,
respectively. The fault occurred on phase A at Bus No. 9 (Solidly grounded)
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.10
0.1
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
0 0.1
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050.050
0.1 0.15
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.10
0.1
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.10
0.1
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -10
1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020.020 0.04
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020.020 0.04 0.06
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020.020.040
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.08
-0.06 -0.04 -0.020.020 0.04
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -10
1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020.020 0.04
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020.020 0.04 0.06
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020.020.040
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020.020.040
d5
Fig. 10. At bus No. 14 fault record from a single-phase to ground of three-phase power System,. are the voltage of phase a, b, and c,
respectively. The fault occurred on phase A at Bus No. 9 (Solidly grounded)
B)
Single line to ground Fault with considering fault resistance i.e R
F
=10
Ω
Here Fault occurs at 9
th
bus on phase A, Fig. 11-18 shows that the fault is in phase A i.e single line to
ground fault, considering fault resistance is equal to 10
Ω
, the voltage at 9
th
bus goes to down but not zero at the
time of fault, when it will occur in case of solidly grounded up to the fault clearing, this indicates that the
importance of fault resistance.
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ignal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.10
0.1 0.2
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.2
-0.10 0.1
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.10
0.1
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.2
-0.10 0.1
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.10
0.1
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -10
1
S
ignal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -10
1
S
ignal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d5
Fig. 11. At bus No. 9 fault record from a single-phase to ground of three-phase power System,. are the voltage of phase a, b, and c,
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1 0 1
S
ig
nal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -50
5 x 10-3
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -505
10 15x 10
-3
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1 0 1
S
ig
nal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -2
-10 1x 10
-3
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -6
-4 -20
2x 10
-3
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -20
-100 x 10-3
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1 0 1
S
ig
nal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -50
5 x 10-3
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -50
5 x 10-3
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d5
Fig. 12. At bus No. 4 fault record from a single-phase to ground of three-phase power System,. are the voltage of phase a, b, and c,
respectively. The fault occurred on phase A at Bus No. 9(Resistance grounding, Rf=10
Ω
)
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
0 0.1
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
0 0.1
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02 0.04 0.06
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02 0.04 0.06
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02 0.04
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d5
Fig. 13. At bus No. 7 fault record from a single-phase to ground of three-phase power System,. are the voltage of phase a, b, and c,
respectively. The fault occurred on phase A at Bus No. 9 (Resistance grounding, Rf=10
Ω
)
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1 0 1
S
ig
nal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050.050
0.1 0.15
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.10
0.1
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
0 0.1
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.2
-0.10 0.1
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.10
0.1
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -10
1
S
ig
nal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020.020 0.04 0.06
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1 0 1
S
ig
nal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020.020 0.04 0.06
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020.020 0.04 0.06
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d5
Fig. 14. At bus No. 10 fault record from a single-phase to ground of three-phase power System,. are the voltage of phase a, b, and c,
respectively. The fault occurred on phase A at Bus No. 9 (Resistance grounding, Rf=10
Ω
)
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ignal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020.020.040 0.06 0.08
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ignal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.08
-0.06 -0.04 -0.020.020 0.04
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ignal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d5
Fig. 15. At bus No. 11, fault record from a single-phase to ground of three-phase power System,. are the voltage of phase a, b, and c,
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
igna
l
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -505
10 15x 10
-3
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
igna
l
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -4
-202 4 6x 10
-3
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -50
5x 10
-3
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -20
-100 x 10-3
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020 0.02
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
igna
l
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -4
-202 4 6x 10
-3
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -50
5x 10
-3
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d5
Fig. 16. At bus No. 12, fault record from a single-phase to ground of three-phase power System,. are the voltage of phase a, b, and c,
respectively. The fault occurred on phase A at Bus No. 9 (Resistance grounding, Rf=10
Ω
)
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
Si
g
n
a
l
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01 0.02 0.03
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02 0.04
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020.020.040.060.080
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
Si
g
n
a
l
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -50
5 10
x 10-3
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.01
0 0.01
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.02
-0.010 0.01
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020.020
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
Si
g
n
a
l
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -50
5 10
x 10-3
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.01
0 0.01
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d5
Fig. 17. At bus No. 13, fault record from a single-phase to ground of three-phase power System,. are the voltage of phase a, b, and c,
respectively. The fault occurred on phase A at Bus No. 9 (Resistance grounding, Rf=10
Ω
)
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ignal
W AVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
0 0.1
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.10
0.1
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -10
1
S
ignal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02 0.04
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020.020 0.04
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02 0.04
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020.020.040
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -10
1
S
ignal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02 0.04
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020.020 0.04
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02 0.04
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020.020.040
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02 0.04
d5
Fig. 18. At bus No. 14, fault record from a single-phase to ground of three-phase power System,. are the voltage of phase a, b, and c,
respectively. The fault occurred on phase A at Bus No. 9 (Resistance grounding, Rf=10
Ω
)
C)
Sudden load applied (50 MW)
Here Sudden load will be applied at 9
th
bus on phase A. Fig. 19-26 clearly shows that the sag appears in
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1 0 1
S
ignal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02 0.04
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ignal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.10
0.1 0.2
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.10
0.1
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ignal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020.020 0.04
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02 0.04
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d5
Fig. 19. Voltages of phase a, b, and c, respectively of Bus No. 9. At bus No. 9 sudden load applied of 50 MW.
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.02
0 0.02
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.02
-0.010 0.01
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -10
1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -4
-20 2 4
x 10-3
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -50
5x 10
-3
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.02
0 0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -20
-100 x 10-3
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -2
-10 1
x 10-3
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -8
-6 -4 -202
4x 10
-3
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d5
Fig. 20. Voltages of phase a, b , and c, respectively of Bus No. 4. At bus No. 9 sudden load applied of 50 MW.
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1 0 1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020.020.040 0.06 0.08
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020.020 0.04
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1 0 1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02 0.04
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020.020 0.04
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1 0 1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.02
-0.010 0.01
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.02
0 0.02
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.02
-0.010 0.01
d5
Fig. 21. Voltages of phase a, b, and c, respectively of Bus No. 7. At bus No. 9 sudden load applied of 50 MW.
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.2
-0.10 0.1
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
-0.050 0.05
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.1
0 0.1
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06 -0.04 -0.020 0.02 0.04
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020.020 0.04 0.06 0.08
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06 -0.04 -0.020 0.02 0.04
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020.020 0.04 0.06
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.02
0 0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02 0.04
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.03
-0.02 -0.010 0.01
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1 0 1
S
ig
nal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1 0 1
S
ig
nal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02 0.04
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020 0.02
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1 0 1
S
ig
nal
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d5
Fig. 23. Voltages of phase a, b, and c, respectively of Bus No. 11. At bus No. 9 sudden load applied of 50 MW.
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -10
1
S
igna
l
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -50
5 10
x 10-3
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
igna
l
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -50
5x 10
-3
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -50
5 10
x 10-3
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -20
-100 x 10-3
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020 0.02
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
igna
l
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -4
-20 2
x 10-3
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -50
5x 10
-3
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d5
Fig. 24. Voltages of phase a, b, and c, respectively of Bus No. 12. At bus No. 9 sudden load applied of 50 MW.
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -10
1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01 0.02
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.02
-0.010 0.01
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020 0.02
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -10-5
0 5
x 10-3
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.02
0 0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.010
0.01
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d5
Fig. 25. Voltages of phase a, b, and c, respectively of Bus No. 13. At bus No. 9 sudden load applied of 50 MW.
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.10
0.1
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.05
0 0.05
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.05
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06
-0.04 -0.020.020.040
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.050
0.050.1
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.04
-0.020 0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020.020
0.04 0.06
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.06 -0.04 -0.020 0.02 0.04
d5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -1
0 1
S
ign
al
WAVELET DECOMPOSITION OF SIGNAL0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.50
0.5
a5
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.02
0 0.02
d1
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.020
0.02 0.04
d2
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.02
0 0.02
d3
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.02
0 0.02
d4
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 -0.02
0 0.02