• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Int. Arch. . vol.18 suppl.2

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Int. Arch. . vol.18 suppl.2"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texto

(1)

Skull Base Surgery in the 21st Century: Accelerated Revolution

Ricardo L. Carrau, MD

1

1Department of Otolaryngology

–Head & Neck Surgery,

Comprehensive Skull Base Surgery Program, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States

Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;18:S121–S122.

All evolution in thought and conduct mustfirst be perceived as heresy and misconduct. George Bernard Shaw

Technological developments in the 21st century are emerging at a neck–breaking pace, bringing dramatic changes to all aspects of our daily life at a global scale. Medicine and other components of health care have been positively affected by new capabilities regarding the gathering, interpretation, and storage of information—whether this is clinical, imaging, physiological, genetic, or other. In the process, some preexis-tent technologies have been enhanced and others have been completely replaced by novel devices.

As a result of these advances, we are witnessing the transi-tion from intuitive or empirical diagnosis and treatment to a more exact and personalized practice of medicine, where physicians are no longer reacting to mere symptoms and signs but looking at the root of a disease and designing treatments specific to its pathogenesis. Diseases that in the past seemed identical, and hence received similar treatments but obtained disparate results, are now recognized as distinctly different problems. Better differentiation has led to customized treat-ments that afford superior and predictable outcomes.

Surgical specialties have benefitted also by the rapid evolution of established techniques, the development of novel procedures, and the rebirth of older methods brought back to the surgical armamentarium after being renovated by tech-nological advances. This transformation has led to improved outcomes while minimizing morbidity.

Skull base surgery is an ideal milieu to integrate these changes. Uniquely posed as a model of interspecialty cooper-ation and cross-pollincooper-ation by a surgical core of otolaryngol-ogists and neurosurgeons, the subspecialty has grown dependent on other surgical and nonsurgical specialties that provide guidance during the preoperative planning, assistance during the surgical act, postoperatively

differenti-ating the disease process and providing adjuvant therapies. Therefore, thefields of radiology, pathology, anesthesiology, endovascular surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, neuro-ophthalmology, endocrinology, medical and radiation oncology, among others, are now embedded with the skull base surgical core seeking a common goal, the best possible care for our patients. Having undergone their respective evolution, these specialties are able to help skull base sur-geons in ways that before seemed sciencefiction.

However, as in other aspects of life, any change in thefield of medicine is often met with resistance and criticism. Although constructive discussion and critical appraisal are essential to precipitate desirable adjustments and eliminate ineffective therapies, resistance in the face of factual evidence commonly represents a fear to move out of the individual “comfort zone.”As evidence supporting the safety and effec-tiveness of various minimally invasive and minimal access techniques continue to accumulate and to be reproduced throughout the world, those initial opposing and heated arguments have significantly dissipated. Increasingly, skull base surgeons seek to learn and adopt these techniques.

Technology has also changed the way we disburse and consume new information. Continued medical education, to update clinical and surgical concepts and to learn new techni-ques, has never been more available and paradoxically so overwhelming. Nonetheless, despite the emergence of various interactive models, e-learning, and simulators, peer-reviewed journals continue to be a pillar of the medical learning process. Following this observation, we offer this special edition of theInternational Archives of Otorhinolaryngology,in which we have gathered the expert opinions of recognized leaders in several of thefields that currently comprise part of theSkull Base Team. Although by no means comprehensive, this special edition delivers an concise update on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, techniques that form the foundation of our surgical planning and postoperative

Editorial

DOI http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1055/s-0034-1390326. ISSN 1809-9777.

Copyright © 2014 by Thieme Publicações Ltda, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Address for correspondence Ricardo L. Carrau, MD, Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck

Surgery, Comprehensive Skull Base Surgery Program, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, United States

(e-mail: carraurl@gmail.com). THIEME

(2)

surveillance; on advances in surgical techniques addressing sellar and clival lesions, while also providing a historical perspective on the evolution of the transsphenoidal approach; on current concepts regarding the management of catastroph-ic hemorrhage due to internal carotid artery injury; and on current methods of reconstruction.

I have been honored and humbled by the opportunity conferred by theInternational Journal of Otorhinolaryngol-ogyto serve as a guest editor for this special issue. More-over, I am extremely grateful and indebted to the authors that selflessly contributed their time and expertise to this edition.

International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Vol. 18 No. S2/2014 Editorial

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Address for correspondence Aline Gomes Bittencourt, MD, PhD, Otorhinolaryngology Department, University of São Paulo, School of

The Hearing Aid section on the Babies ’ Portal website (http:// portaldosbebes.fob.usp.br) was created to provide parents and caregivers of hearing-impaired children convenient

who say they hear well, inferior results compared with normal standards were found for adults in an auditory processing test (SSW, which assesses dichotic listening) and

The dissociation between the diagnostic imaging in the preoperative and transoperative periods in patients submit- ted to laryngeal microsurgery has been observed in clinical

Nine patients (45%) be- tween 2 years and 6 years and 2 months had fi ne motor problems, and 70% of them had multiple disabilities (hemi- plegia, neuropsychomotor development

Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochle- ar implant system. Clinical

In the evaluation of the aspects related to oral cavity, the presence of halitosis; lesions suggestive of caries; observation of periodontal problems, characterized by

Conclusion This study suggests that bariatric surgery can cause symptoms of eustachian tube dysfunction, probably due to rapid weight loss and the consequent loss of peritubal