• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.65 número1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.65 número1"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texto

(1)

RevBrasAnestesiol.2015;65(1):47---50

REVISTA

BRASILEIRA

DE

ANESTESIOLOGIA

OfficialPublicationoftheBrazilianSocietyofAnesthesiology

www.sba.com.br

SCIENTIFIC

ARTICLE

Effects

of

smoking

on

venous

cannulation

pain:

a

randomized

prospective

trial

Volkan

Hanci

a,∗

,

Hasan

Ali

Kiraz

b

,

Dilek

Ömür

a

,

Serpil

Ekin

b

,

Berna

Uyan

b

,

Derya

Arslan

Yurtlu

c

,

Serhan

Yurtlu

a

aDepartmentofAnesthesiologyandReanimation,DokuzEylulUniversityMedicalFaculty,Konak,Turkey

bDepartmentofAnesthesiologyandReanimation,CanakkaleOnsekizMartUniversityMedicalFaculty,Canakkale,Turkey cAnesthesiologyandReanimationClinic,KatipCelebiUniversityIzmirAtaturkEducationandResearchHospital,Izmir,Turkey

Received6December2013;accepted13March2014

Availableonline29April2014

KEYWORDS

Smoking;

Venouscannulation; Pain

Abstract

Backgroundandobjectives: Ithasbeendemonstratedthatsmokingincreasespainperception; howevertheeffectofsmokingonperceptionofpainduringvenouscannulationisnotknown. Thepurposeofthisstudyistodeterminewhetherornotsmokinghasaneffectonpain percep-tionduetoperipheralvenouscannulation.

Methods:220patientsscheduledtohaveelectivesurgerywereenrolledinthestudyandwere dividedintotwogroups(GroupSandC,n=110foreach) accordingtotheir smokinghabits. Numericalratingscalewasintroducedtothepatientsandthenperipheralvenouscannulation atthedorsumofthehandwasmadewitha20Gintracath.Painperceptionofthepatientswas scoredbysubsequentnumericalratingscalequestioning.

Results:Thedemographiccharacteristicsofthegroupswereidentical.Numericalratingscale scoresinGroupSandCwere3.31±1.56and1.65±1.23,respectively(p<0.001).

Conclusion: Painperceptionduetoperipheralvenouscannulationishigherinsmokers.Future studiesonpaintreatmentshouldconsiderthesmokinghabitsofpatients.

© 2014SociedadeBrasileirade Anestesiologia.Publishedby ElsevierEditoraLtda.Allrights reserved.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mails:vhanci@gmail.com,volkanhanci@yahoo.com(V.Hanci).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2014.03.004

(2)

48 V.Hancietal.

PALAVRAS-CHAVE

HábitodeFumar; Cateterismo periférico; Dor

Efeitosdotabagismosobreadorduranteocateterismovenoso:umestudo prospectivoerandomizado

Resumo

Justificativaeobjetivos: Sabe-seque o tabagismo aumenta apercepc¸ão de dor; porém, o efeitodotabagismosobreapercepc¸ãodadorduranteocateterismovenosonãoéconhecido.O objetivodesteestudofoideterminarseotabagismotemounãoalgumefeitosobreapercepc¸ão dadorduranteapunc¸ãovenosaperiférica.

Métodos: Foramincluídosnoestudo220pacientesagendadosparacirurgiaeletiva randomica-mentealocadosemdoisgrupos:GrupoS(n=110)eGrupoC(n=110),deacordocomseushábitos tabagísticos.Ospacientesforaminstruídossobreousodaescalanuméricadeclassificac¸ãoda dore,emseguida,apunc¸ãovenosaperiféricafoifeitanodorsodamãocomum cateterde calibre20G(Intracath®).Apercepc¸ãodedordospacientesfoiposteriormenteregistradade

acordocomosescoresdaescalanumérica.

Resultados: Ascaracterísticasdemográficasdosgruposeramidênticas.Osescoresdaescala numéricadedordosgruposSeCforam3,31±1,56e1,65±1,23,respectivamente(p<0,001).

Conclusão:Apercepc¸ãodadorporcausadapunc¸ãovenosaperiféricaémaioremfumantes. Estudos futuros sobre o tratamento da dor devem considerar os hábitos tabagísticos dos pacientes.

©2014SociedadeBrasileiradeAnestesiologia.PublicadoporElsevierEditoraLtda.Todosos direitosreservados.

Introduction

PainisdefinedbytheInternationalAssociationfortheStudy ofPain asactualor potential tissuedamageaccompanied byan unpleasantsensory andemotional experience,or it isdefinedintermsofsuchdamage.1,2Forthisreasonpain

shouldnotbeevaluatedaspurelyphysiologicalorsomatic.

Severityofpainsensationisaffectedbyenvironmental

fac-torsandsubjectivepersonalpastexperiences.Asaresult,

painofthesameintensitymaybeperceiveddifferentunder

similarconditions.3,4

Cigaretteusebringsmanyhealthproblems,suchasheart

and lung diseases, many different types of cancer and

asthma.Inadditionsmokingmaychangepainsensationand

postoperativeanalgesicrequirements.4---7

Intravenous(IV)catheterizationisoneofthemost

fre-quently used interventions for diagnostic and treatment

applications.IVcatheterizationfrequentlycausespainand

anxiety.4 In the literature there are many studies onthe

relationshipbetweenvenouscatheterizationandpain.

How-ever,moststudieshavenotincludedtheeffectofsmoking

onvenouscannulationpain.8---11

Thehypothesisofthisstudyisthatanadultsmokinghabit

willincreasethepainofvenouscatheterization.Totestthis

hypothesisthevenouscatheterizationpainofsmokingand

non-smokingpatientswasevaluated.Theprimaryoutcome

waspainscoreaftercannulation.

Materials

and

methods

CanakkaleOnsekizMartUniversityClinicalResearchEthics

Committee granted permission for this study (date:

16/05/2012,no:89,chairman:H.Aksulu).Writteninformed

consentswereobtainedfromthepatients whoenrolledin

thestudyandthestudywascompletedatCanakkaleOnsekiz

MartUniversitybetweenMay2012andJanuary2013.Atotal

of220malepatientsbetween18and65yearsofagewere

includedinthestudy.Patientshavinganychronicdiseases

especially neurologicalor psychiatric, communication

dif-ficulty,analgesic usewithintheprevious 24h, or havinga

previoushistoryoftraumaorneurologicdeficitatthehand

werenotincludedinthestudy.Patientsincludedinthestudy

werenotadministeredpremedication.

Patientstaken intothe operation roomwere informed

about the 10stepnumerical painscore.The smoking

his-tory of the patients wasrecorded. According to smoking

habitcasesweredividedinto2groups.Thesmokergroupof

patientshadahistoryof5yearsofsmokingformorethan5

cigarettesaday(GroupS,n=110).Thenon-smokinggroup

consisted of caseswho didnot smokeor whohadceased

smokingatleast1yearpreviously(GroupC,n=110).Venous

cannulationfor allcaseswascompletedby placinga20G

intracath in avein onthe backof thehand. The severity

ofpainduringvenous cannulationwasquestionedandthe

responseswererecorded.

Statisticalanalysis

Statistical analysisof datawas completedusingSPSS

ver-sion 15.0(SPSS Inc.)softwareprogram.Data aregivenas

mean±standarddeviation.Fordataanalysis,theStudent’s

ttestwasused.Significancewasacceptedasp<0.05.

Results

Theresearchwascompletedin220malepatients.The

char-acteristicsofthepatientsareshowninTable1.

The numerical rating scale (NRS) values after venous

catheterizationofGroupSweresignificantlyhigherthanthe

valuesofGroupC(p<0.01)(Table1).Whenthecorrelation

of demographicandsmokinghabitswithvenous

(3)

Effectsofsmokingonvenouscannulationpain 49

Table1 Characteristicsofcasesincludedinthestudygroup.

Characteristic GroupC(n=110) GroupS(n=110) p

Age(year) 40.82±14.68 39.09±13.00 0.354a

Height(m) 173.15±6.82 173.86±6.80 0.441a

Weight(kg) 78.40±13.67 76.88±12.96 0.396a

Numberofcigarettepacketsperdayb --- 1.25±0.56 <0.001a

Durationofsmokinghabit(year) --- 22.37±13.39 <0.001a

NRS 1.65±1.23 3.31±1.56 <0.001a

NRS,numericalratingscale.

a Student’sttest.

b Onepacketcontains20cigarettes.

Table2 Correlationofvenouscannulationpainscoreswith demographiccharacteristicsandsmokinghabitsofcases.

Factor Correlation

coefficient

p

Numberofcigarettesperday (packet)

0.451 <0.001a

Durationofsmokinghabit

(year)

0.481 <0.001a

Age 0.118 0.082a

a Pearsoncorrelationtest.

significantpositivecorrelationbetweentheNRSvalues

dur-ingvenous catheterizationwithdurationof smokinghabit

andamount ofcigarettesconsumed (p<0.001).No

signifi-cantcorrelationwasdeterminedbetweenageandpainafter

venouscatheterization(p=0.082)(Table2).

Discussion

Inourstudy evaluatingthevenous catheterizationpainin

smoker and non-smoker patients we determined that the

painscoresduetovenouscatheterizationweresignificantly

higherinsmokersthanthatofnon-smokers.

Currently smoking is a common habit that causes the

mostseriouspublichealthproblems.Smokingisknowntobe

relatedtoawiderangeofseriousdiseasesincludingheart

andveindiseases,lungdiseasesandmanytypesofcancer,

especiallylungcancer.4---7

Therehavebeenmanystudiesresearchingtheeffectof

smokingonpainperception.Previousstudieshavereported

smoking to be a risk factor for development of chronic

pain and related to high perception of pain.6,12 It is

emphasizedthatpainperceptionofsmokersishigherthan

non-smokers,13 however the mechanism behind the

rela-tionship between smoking and pain has not been clearly

explained.14Studiesreportingthatchronicsmokingchanges

theendogenouspainmechanismsaffectingpainperception

areavailable.15 Anothermechanism beingdebatedis that

chronicnicotineexposureduetosmokingaffectsthe

cen-tral nervous system and asa result, changes in the pain

perceptionofsmokersoccur.14,16Experimentalstudieshave

emphasizedtheanalgesicpropertiesofnicotine.Inaddition

epidemiologicalstudiessupporttheideathatsmokingis a

riskfactorforchronicandacutepain.17

Studieshaveemphasizedthatsmokingincreasesthepain

of propofol injection. Another study reported that

nico-tinereplacement insmokersreducedthepainofpropofol

injection.7

Experimentalstudies supportthis data.Inan incisional

painmodelofratsaddictedtonicotineanddeprivedofit,

thermal andmechanic stimuli increasedthe sensitivity to

pain.5

Studies have emphasized that smoking is one of the

predictorsofsevere paininthepostoperativeperiod.18 In

anotherstudyof520toothextractionssmokingwasreported

among the factors related to increased pain levels after

toothextraction.19 Insmokers,deprivedofnicotineinthe

postoperativeperiod,thereisanincreaseinopioid

require-mentsforpatient-controlledanalgesia.20

Venouscatheterizationisafrequentlyusedintervention

inroutinemedicalapplicationstotakebloodsamplesorto

administermedications.4,21 Inadditionduringvenous

cath-eterizationinterventionpainoccursandpreviousuntreated

painfromvenouscatheterizationincreasesanxiety during

medicalintervention,lowers thepainthresholdand

espe-cially,maycausereluctancetomedicalinterventions.4,22

Totreatvenouscatheterizationpainmanydifferent

med-icationsand methodsmaybeused.Among thesemethods

aredextrosesolutions,lidocaineprilocainecreams,

ametho-cainecream,subcutaneouslidocaineinjections,anduseof

differentcolorlights.8---11

Additionallyinstudiesevaluatingthepainofvenous

cath-eterization,methodologicalfactorsaffectingpainshouldbe

considered. For example, the menstrual cycle in women

changes the pain threshold.23,24 Gender differences may

causedifferencesinpainperception.25,26Forthisreasonwe

includedonlymeninourstudy.

Previousstudieshavereportedthatageisoneofthe

fac-torsaffectingpainsensation.27---29Howeverinourstudythere

was no correlation determined between age and venous

interventionpain.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the results of this study show that

smok-inginadultmalesaffectsvenouscatheterizationpain,and

venous catheterizationpain in smokers is greater than in

non-smokers.Thus,itwillbebetterforthefuturestudieson

paintotakeintoaccountthatthesmokingstatusofpatients

(4)

50 V.Hancietal.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

References

1.MorganGE,MikhailMG.Painmanagement.In:Clinical anesthe-siology.2nded.NewJersey:Prentice-HallInternational,Inc.; 1996.p.274---316.

2.HancıV,KirazHA,ÖmürD,etal.Postoperativepaininchildren. JAnesthClinRes.2012;3:219.

3.McGrathPA. Pain inchildren: nature,assessment and treat-ment.NewYork:GuilfordPress;1990.

4.Topalo˘gluN,TekinM,YıldırımS,etal.Passivesmokingincreases painperceptioninchildrenundergoingvenouscatheterization. ActaPaediatr.2013;102:e493---6.

5.ZhangZ,LiuX,LuS,etal.Increasedpaininresponseto mechan-icalorthermalstimulationinaratmodelofincision-induced painwithnicotinedependenceandwithdrawal.ExpTherMed. 2013;5:1063---6.

6.YuS,HootenWM,WarnerDO.Effectsofsmokingcessationon paininolderadults.NicotineTobRes.2011;13:919---25. 7.ErdenV,Bas¸arano˘glu G, ErkalpK, etal. Theeffectof

nico-tinetreatmentonpropofolinjectionpain.TrakyaUnivTipDerg. 2010;27:18---22.

8.Rahimi M,MakaremJ,RooyanP.Effectsofaflashoflightin differentcolorsonvenouscannulationpain:arandomized, con-trolledtrial.JClinAnesth.2013;25:42---6.

9.YeohC,LeeC.Pain duringvenouscannulation:double-blind, randomizedclinicaltrialofanalgesic effectbetweentopical amethocaineandeutecticmixtureoflocalanesthetic.J Anaes-thesiolClinPharmacol.2012;28:205---9.

10.Ravishankar N, Elliot SC, Beardow Z, et al. A comparison ofRapydan® patchandAmetop® gelforvenouscannulation. Anaesthesia.2012;67:367---70.

11.AgarwalA,YadavG,GuptaD,etal.Theroleofaflashoflightfor attenuationofvenouscannulationpain:aprospective, random-ized,placebo-controlledstudy.AnesthAnalg.2008;106:814---6. 12.WeingartenTN,ShiY,MantillaCB,etal.Smokingandchronic pain:areal-but-puzzlingrelationship.MinnMed.2011;94:35---7. 13.HootenWM,TownsendCO,BruceBK,etal.Effectsofsmoking statusonimmediatetreatmentoutcomesofmultidisciplinary painrehabilitation.PainMed.2009;10:347---55.

14.KanarekRB,CarringtonC.Sucroseconsumptionenhancesthe analgesiceffectsofcigarettesmokinginmaleandfemale smok-ers.Psychopharmacology(Berl).2004;173:57---63.

15.NakajimaM,Al’AbsiM.Enhancedpainperceptionpriorto smok-ing cessation is associated with early relapse. Biol Psychol. 2011;88:141---6.

16.MukhinAG,KimesAS,CheferSI,etal.Greaternicotinic acetyl-cholinereceptordensityinsmokersthaninnonsmokers:aPET studywith2-18F-FA-85380.JNuclMed.2008;49:1628---35. 17.Shi Y, Weingarten TN, Mantilla CB, et al. Smoking and

pain:pathophysiologyandclinicalimplications.Anesthesiology. 2010;113:977---92.

18.YangZ,YangZ,Arheart KL, etal. CYP2D6 poormetabolizer genotype and smoking predict severe postoperative pain in female patientson arrival to the recovery room. Pain Med. 2012;13:604---9.

19.Bortoluzzi MC, Manfro AR, Nodari RJ Jr, et al. Predictive variablesforpostoperativepainafter520consecutive dental extractionsurgeries.GenDent.2012;60:58---63.

20.Steinmiller CL, Diederichs C, Roehrs TA, et al. Postsurgical patient-controlledopioidself-administrationisgreaterin hos-pitalizedabstinentsmokersthannonsmokers.JOpioidManag. 2012;8:227---35.

21.Vokurka M,Hugo J. Practicaldictionary of medicine. Praha: Maxdorf;2008.

22.Bijttebier P, Vertommen H. The impact of previous experi-enceonchildren’sreactionstovenepuncture.JHealthPsychol. 1998;3:39---46.

23.HanciV,Ayo˘gluH,YilmazM,etal.Effectofmenstrualcycle on the injection pain due to propofol. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:425---7.

24.RingC,VeldhuijzenvanZantenJJ,KavussanuM.Effectsofsex, phaseofthemenstrualcycleandgonadalhormonesonpainin healthyhumans.BiolPsychol.2009;81:189---91.

25.Kuba T, Quinones-Jenab V. The role of female gonadal hormones in behavioral sex differences in persistent and chronicpain:clinicalversuspreclinicalstudies.BrainResBull. 2005;66:179---88.

26.Gullone E. The development of normal fear: a century of research.ClinPsycholRev.2000;20:429---51.

27.ZhangY, Zhang S,Gao Y, et al. Factorsassociated withthe pressure pain threshold in healthy Chinese men. Pain Med. 2013;14:1291---300.

28.WandnerLD,ScipioCD,HirshAT,etal.Theperceptionofpainin others:howgender,race,andageinfluencepainexpectations. JPain.2012;13:220---7.

Imagem

Table 1 Characteristics of cases included in the study group.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

A prospective study analysing the effect of pain on probe insertion, and the biopsy strategy, on the patients’ perception of pain during TRUS- guided biopsy of the

Based on the aforementioned data, our hypothesis is that smoking alters olfactory and gustatory perception in compar- ison to the recognition capability of individuals who never

Tendo em vista a influência das experiências de injustiça na croni- ficação da dor musculoesquelética, e a ausência de um instrumento capaz de avaliar a experiência de injustiça

Considering the influence of the experiences of injustice in the chronification of musculoskeletal pain, and the absence of an instrument to evaluate the experience of injustice

Foram utilizados uma entrevista semiestruturada, o questionário sobre dor neuropática Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions e, para avaliar a qualidade de vida o questionário

Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the World Health Organiza- tion Quality of Life-BREF instrument domains for patients with neuro- pathic

Os melho- res resultados deste estudo foram quando se comparou o grupo que recebeu acupuntura com aquele que não recebeu nenhum estímulo (controle), com um especial e

METHODS : Clinical-experimental quantitative trial, with con- trol group and blind, with 47 healthy women, aged between 18 and 55 years (36.3±10.6), divided deterministically