w ww . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / b j p
Original
Article
Phytochemical
study
of
Pilosocereus
pachycladus
and
antibiotic-resistance
modifying
activity
of
syringaldehyde
Severino
Gonc¸
alves
de
Brito-Filho
a,
Jéssica
Karina
da
Silva
Maciel
b,
Yanna
Carolina
Ferreira
Teles
c,
Milen
Maria
Magalhães
de
Souza
Fernandes
a,
Otemberg
Souza
Chaves
a,
Maria
Denise
Leite
Ferreira
a,
Pedro
Dantas
Fernandes
d,
Leonardo
P.
Felix
e,
Isis
Caroline
da
Silva
Cirino
f,
José
Pinto
Siqueira-Júnior
f,
Raimundo
Braz-Filho
g,h,
Maria
de
Fátima
Vanderlei
de
Souza
a,b,∗aProgramadePós-graduac¸ãoemProdutosNaturaiseSintéticosBioativos,CentrodeCiênciasdaSaúde,UniversidadeFederaldaParaíba,JoãoPessoa,PB,Brazil
bProgramadePós-graduac¸ãoemDesenvolvimentoeInovac¸ãoTecnológicaemMedicamentos,CentrodeCiênciasdaSaúde,UniversidadeFederaldaParaíba,JoãoPessoa,PB,Brazil
cDepartamentodeQuímicaeFísica,CentrodeCiênciasAgrárias,UniversidadeFederaldaParaíba,Areia,PB,Brazil
dDepartamentodeAgroecologiaeAgropecuária,CentrodeCiênciasAgráriaseAmbientais,UniversidadeEstadualdaParaíba,CampinaGrande,PB,Brazil
eDepartamentodeCiênciasBiológicas,CentrodeCiênciasAgrárias,UniversidadeFederaldaParaíba,Areia,PB,Brazil
fLaboratóriodeGenéticadeMicroorganismos,DepartamentodeBiologiaMolecular,UniversidadeFederaldaParaíba,JoãoPessoa,PB,Brazil
gLaboratóriodeCiênciasQuímicas,UniversidadeEstadualdoNorteFluminenseDarcyRibeiro,CamposdosGoitacazes,RJ,Brazil
hProgramadePós-graduac¸ãoemQuímica,UniversidadeFederalRuraldoRiodeJaneiro,Seropédica,RJ,Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received25March2017
Accepted5June2017
Availableonline5July2017
Keywords:
Foragecactus
Caatingaecoregion
Cactaceae
Phytochemicalstudy
Antibacterialactivity
ResistantStaphylococcusaureus
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
PilosocereuspachycladusF.Ritter,Cactaceae,popularlyknownas“facheiro”,isusedasfoodand tradi-tionalmedicineinBraziliancaatingaecoregion.Theplantisusedtotreatprostateinflammationand urinaryinfection.ThepresentworkreportsthefirstsecondarymetabolitesisolatedfromP.pachycladus. Therefore,theisolatedcompound4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde(syringaldehyde)was evalu-atedasmodulatorofStaphylococcusaureuspumpefflux-mediatedantibioticresistance.Theisolationof compoundswasperformedusingchromatographictechniquesandthestructuralelucidationwascarried outbyspectroscopicmethods.InordertoevaluatesyringaldehydeabilitytomodulateS.aureus antibi-oticresistance,itsminimuminhibitoryconcentrations(g/ml)wasfirstdeterminate,then,thetested antibioticsminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsweredeterminedinthepresenceofthesyringaldehyde inasub-inhibitoryconcentration.Thechromatographicproceduresledtoisolationoftwelvecompounds fromP.pachycladusincludingfattyacids,steroids,chlorophyllderivatives,phenolicsandalignan.The syringaldehydedidnotshowanyantibacterialactivityat256g/mlagainstS.aureus.Ontheotherhand thecompoundwasabletoreducetheantibioticconcentration(tetracycline,norfloxacin,ethidium bro-mide)requiredtoinhibitthegrowthofdrug-resistantbacteria,showingtheabilityofsyringaldehydeof inhibitingtheeffluxpumponthesebacteria.
©2017SociedadeBrasileiradeFarmacognosia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisisanopen accessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Introduction
TheCactaceaefamily consistsof about127generaand1405 species(Huntetal.,2006).Brazilisconsideredthethirdlargest centerofdiversityofthisfamilywherethecaatingaecoregion com-prises58species(Zappietal.,2010).
Thecacti areplants that showspecial morpho-physiological characteristicswithseveralanatomicalvariationsthatensuretheir
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:[email protected](M.F.Souza).
capacitytoretainwaterandtosurviveinhotandaridenvironments (Hernández-Hernándezetal.,2011).Cactiareusedas supplemen-talfoodforruminantsandindroughttimesthespeciesarealso usedasfoodforhuman,mainlyinpreparationofflourandcakes (CavalcantiandResende,2013;Macieletal.,2016).
PilosocereuspachycladusF.Ritterisaperennialshrubpopularly
knowninBrazilas“facheiro”(Abudetal.,2010).Itplays impor-tantroleinruralcommunitiesduetheuseofthisspeciestomake biscuits,cakesandcandies.Therefore,localpeoplementiontheuse ofitsrootstotreatprostaticinflammation,andthestemdecoction isusedagainsturinaryinfections,fluandfuruncle(Lucenaetal., 2013;Agraetal.,2008).Accordingly,theantimicrobialactivityof Cactaceae species hasbeenpreviously reported(Sanchezetal.,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2017.06.001
0102-695X/©2017SociedadeBrasileiradeFarmacognosia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://
2014).Infact,plantextractsand compoundshave beenstudied aimingtodiscovernewbactericides,bacteriostaticandbacterial resistancemodulatoractiveproducts.Thisfacthasgainattention especially in recent years, when the raising of bacterial resis-tancehasbecomeaseriouspublichealthconcerningtoalmostall antibacterialagents.Amongtheresistantstrainsstudied,themain mechanismofbacterialresistanceisthepresenceofeffluxpumps inbacterialcellmembrane,whichallowtheleavingofantibiotics fromthecell(Piddock,2006).
ConsideringthegreatimportanceofCactaceaefamily,thisstudy reportsthe firstphytochemicalstudy ofP.pachycladus and the evaluation of theisolated compound 4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxy benzaldehyde (syringaldehyde) as modulator of Staphylococcus
aureuspumpefflux-mediatedantibioticresistance.
Materialsandmethods
Instrumentsandreagents
Isolatedcompoundswereidentifiedby1Dand2DNMRanalysis (1H500MHz,13C125MHz,MercuryVarianand1H200MHz,13C
50MHz,MercuryVarian)usingdeuteratedsolventsandinfrared (IR)Perkin-ElmerFT-IR-1750modelusingKBrdiscs;medium pres-sureliquidchromatography(MPLC)wascarriedoutusingaBUCHI (Switzerland)Pump ManagerC-615. High pressureliquid chro-matography(HPLC)wasperformedusingaShimadzuHPLCwith detectordiodearray.
Plantmaterial
Theplant material of Pilosocereuspachycladus F. Ritter, Cac-taceae,wascollectedinBoaVista(Paraíba,Brazil),inNovember 2010. The botanical identification wascarried out by Prof. Dr. LeonardoPessoaFelix(CCA/UFPB)andavoucherspecimen(19544) wasdeposited in the Herbarium Prof. Jaime Coelho de Morais (CCA/UFPB).
Extraction,fractionationandisolationofcompounds
Freshplantmaterialofthestems,fruitandflowersofP.
pachy-cladusweredriedseparatelyinanovenwithcirculatingairat40◦C
for72handeachthematerialwasgroundinamechanicalmill, pro-viding4.934g,2.884gand10.022gofpowder,respectively.The powderofthestem,fruitand theflowerswereseparately sub-mitted tomacerationin ethanol (EtOH) (95%)for 72hatroom temperature.Theobtainedethanolicextractswereconcentrated with a rotatory evaporator yielding 205.58g of crude ethanol extractofstem(CES),206.69goffruit(CEFR)and253.53g(CEFL) offlowers.
Thecrudeethanolicextractofstem(CES)wassolubilizedusing EtOH:H2O(7:3)andtheobtainedsolutionwassequentially
parti-tionedinseparationfunnelusinghexane,dichloromethane,ethyl acetate(EtOAc)andn-butanol.Theobtainedsolutionswere con-centratedinrotatoryevaporator,yielding 33.18gof thehexane phase,16.70gofthedichloromethanephase,6.11gofethylacetate phaseand29.34gofn-butanolphaseandthehydroalcoholicphase (90.20g).
AportionofthehexanephaseoftheCES(10.5g)wassubjected tochromatographic column(Column 1)usingsilica gelandthe solventshexane,dichloromethaneandmethanol,pureorin mix-turesincreasingpolarity,resultingin124fractions.Theobtained fractionswereconcentratedandanalyzedbythinlayer chromatog-raphy(TLC).Thefraction31/59(0.7883g)waschromatographed atthesameconditions,which werecombinedafteranalysisby TLC.Thesub-fraction1/33(0.151g)wasagainchromatographed
followingthesamemethodtoobtainapurewhiteamorphoussolid (39mg),codedascompound1.
The fraction 81/113 (0.72g) from column 1 was chro-matographedin silicacolumn using hexane,CH2Cl2 and MeOH
andprovided a purewhiteprecipitateencoded ascompound 2 (250mg).
Thefraction114/124(0.90g) waschromatographed in silica flashcolumnusinghexane,EtOAcandMeOH.Fromthiscolumn 73fractionswerecollectedandcombinedbyTLC.Thecombined fractions22/24and41/46(darkgreensolids)werepurewhen ana-lyzedbyTLC,beinglabeledascompound3(20mg)andcompound 4(40mg),respectively.
Thefraction60/80(1.28g) fromcolumn1 wassubmittedto silica column using as eluents hexane, CH2Cl2 and MeOH. The
columnyielded52fractionsanalyzedandcombinedbyTLC.The combinedfractions08/16provided600mgofpurewhitecrystals (compound5).
AnaliquotofdichloromethanephaseoftheCES(10.07g)was submittedtovacuumliquidchromatography(VLCI),usingsilica gelina Büchnerfunnelwithporousplate.Thefollowing gradi-entmixtureofsolventswereused:hexane:CH2Cl2(7:3),CH2Cl2
(100%), CH2Cl2:MeOH (9:1), CH2Cl2:MeOH (8:2), CH2Cl2:MeOH
(7:3),CH2Cl2:MeOH(1:1)and EtOAc:MeOH (1:1). Thefractions
were concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain: 0.019g, hexane:CH2Cl2 (7:3); 0.162g, CH2Cl2; 8g, CH2Cl2:MeOH (9:1);
2.239g,CH2Cl2:MeOH(8:2);0.244g,CH2Cl2:MeOH(7:3),0.400g,
CH2Cl2:MeOH(1:1)and0.220g,EtOAc:MeOH(1:1).
ThefractionCH2Cl2(0.162g)fromVLCIwassubjectedtoMPLC
using silica flash as stationary phase and hexane, CH2Cl2 and
methanolasmobilephase(pureorbinarymixtures)obtainingfifty fractionsanalyzedandcombinedbyTLC.Thefraction14/18showed pureyellowcrystalsbeinglabeledascompound6(25mg).
ThefractionCH2Cl2:MeOH(9:1)(7.9139g)fromVLCIwas
chro-matographedinsilicacolumnusinghexane,CH2Cl2andmethanol
(pureorbinarymixtures).Thisprocedureresultedinapurewhite amorphoussolid,namedascompound7(32mg).
The CEFR was partitioned in separation funnel using the samemethoddescribedforCES.Fromthepartitionthefollowing phases were obtained: 87.13gof thehexane phase, 20.14g of thedichloromethanephase,4.69gofethylacetatephase,41.83g of n-butanolic phase, and 16.76gof hydroalcoholic phase. The dichloromethanephase oftheCEE(10g) wassubmittedtoVLC (VLCII) using hexane, CH2Cl2 and MeOH alone or mixtures in
gradientwise.Theobtainedfractionswereconcentratedinrotary evaporator.
ThefractionCH2Cl2:MeOH(9:1)(3.4g)fromVLCIIwas
sub-jected to silica column chromatography using hexane, CH2Cl2
and MeOH. The combined fractions 6/12 (0.95g) by from this columnchromatographywererechromatographedfollowingthe samemethodresulting in33 fractions.The fraction12showed whitecrystals(12mg),namedascompound8.
TheethylacetatephaseofCEFR(4.69g)waschromatographed incolumnofSephadexLH-20elutedwithmethanolyielding37 fractions.Thecombinedfractions4/14wererechromatographed using the same method. An aliquot (0.100g) of the obtained sub-fractions 4/10, was injected at a concentration of 5mg/ml in an HPLC ( 269nm) using a C18 column and gradient method H2O:MeOH (5:95) by 1h. The chromatogram showed
threepeaks.Thesampleswerecollectedandanalyzed.The sec-ond peak collected was named as compound 9 (6mg) (white solid).
Analiquot ofhexane phase ofCEFL (10g)wassubmittedto columnchromatographyusinghexane,EtOAcandMeOHpureor ingradientmixtures.Fromthiscolumn,82fractionscollectedof 20mlwerecollected.Thesub-fraction36/42showedaprecipitate andasupernatant.Thesupernatant(0.20g)waschromatographed following thesamemethodologypurifyingtransparent crystals, labeledascompound10(46mg).Theprecipitatewaswashedwith hexaneandnamedascompound11(18mg).Thecombined frac-tion56/60(0.065g)fromCEFLhexanephaseshowedaprecipitate (whitecrystals).Itwaswashedwithhexanetoyieldthecompound 12(25mg).
Minimuminhibitoryconcentrationandmodulationofbacterial
resistance
The antibiotics norfloxacin, erythromycin and tetracycline were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (USA). The antibiotic solutions were prepared according to the guidelines of CLSI (2005).Stocksolutionsof4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde (syringaldehyde)werepreparedusingDMSOandatthehighest concentrationafterdilutioninthebroth(4%)causednobacterial growthinhibition.
Theminimuminhibitoryconcentrations(MIC)oftheantibiotics andthetestedcompoundsyringaldehydeweredeterminedinBHI bythemicrodilutionassayusing asuspension ofca.105cfu/ml
andadrugconcentrationrangeof256-0.5g/ml(two-foldserial dilutions). TheMIC wasdefinedas thelowest concentrationat which nobacterialgrowthwasobserved. For theevaluation of syringaldehydeasmodulatorofantibioticresistance,theMICof theantibioticsweredeterminedinthepresenceofthecompound inasub-inhibitoryconcentration(Falcão-Silvaetal.,2009).
TheS.aureusstrainsusedwere:SA1199B,whichoverexpresses
thenorAgeneencodingtheNorAfluoroquinolones(suchas nor-floxacin) efflux protein; RN4220 harboring plasmid pUL5054, which carries the gene encoding the MsrA macrolide (such as erythromycin)effluxprotein;andIS-58,whichpossessestheTetK tetracyclineeffluxprotein.Thestrains,kindlyprovidedbyprofessor SimonGibbons(UniversityCollegeLondon,UK),weremaintained inbloodagarbase(LaboratóriosDifcoLtda.,Brazil)slantsand,prior touse,thecellsweregrownovernightat37◦Cinbrainheart
infu-sionbroth(BHI–LaboratóriosDifcoLtda.,Brazil).
Results
Byusingtypicalchromatographicproceduresandspectroscopic methods (IR,NMR 1H and 13C) 13 compounds wereidentified,
includingfattyacids,steroids, chlorophyllderivatives,phenolics andalignan.
Compound1: IR(KBr,cm−1):3401,2948,2868.NMR 1H(ı,
CD3OD,200MHz):3.63(t,J=6.56Hz,H-1),1.24–1.69(m),0.87(t,
J=6.26Hz,H-10).NMR13C(ı,CD
3OD,50MHz):63.09(C-1);32.77
(C-2),31.92(C-4),29.70,29.61,29.42,29.36,25.72(C-3),22.69, 14.13(C-10).
Compound2:MS(m/z):M−255.1;IR(KBr,cm−1):2918,2849,
1771,1448,1305.NMR1H(ı,CDCl
3,200MHz):2.34(t,J=7.46Hz,
H-2),1.60(q,J=7.35Hz,H-15),1.25(bs),0.87(t,J=6.44Hz,H-16). NMR13C(ı,CDCl
3,50MHz):180.29(C-1),34.07(C-2),31.92(C-4),
29.69(C-5,C-12,C-13,C-14),29.59(C-11),29.43(C-6),29.36 (C-7),29.24(C-8),29.05(C-9,C-10),24.65(C-3),22.69(C-15),14.13 (C-16).
Compound6:IR(KBr,cm−1):1670,1514,1423,1172,1038.NMR 1H(ı,CDCl
3,200MHz):9,92 (s,H-7),7.26(s, H-2/H-6),4.07(s,
OCH3C-3/C-5).NMR13C(ı,CDCl3,50MHz):190.78(C-7),147.29
(C-3/C-5),140.75(C-4),129.30(C-1),106.63(C-2/C-6),56.43(OCH3
C-3/OCH3C-5).
Compound8: IR(KBr,cm−1):3354,1655,1597,1516,1126,
1026.NMR1H(ı,C
3D6O,500MHz):7.13(2H,d,J=8.6Hz,H-2/H-6),
6.78(2H,d,J=8.6Hz,H-3/H-5),3.50(s,2H,H-7).NMR13C(ı,C 3D6O,
100MHz):173.29(C-8),157.14(C-4),131.15(C-2/C-6),126.50 (C-1),115.91(C-3/C-5),40.50(C-7).
Compound9:IR(KBr,cm−1):3450,1450,1160.NMR1Hand 13C:Table1.
Minimuminhibitoryconcentrationandmodulationofbacterial
resistance
ThesyringaldehydeisolatedfromP.pachycladusstemsdidnot show any antibacterial activity at 256g/ml against all tested strainsofS.aureus(MICused≥512g/ml).Whenthecompound
wasaddedinthegrowthmedium at128g/ml(MIC≤¼),a32
timesreductioninMICwasobservedfortetracycline,adramatic reductionintheMICoftheantibiotic.TheMICofnorfloxacinwas reducedbytwotimesandtheMICoferythromycindidnotdecrease (Table2).
Discussion
Structuralelucidation
TheIRspectrum(KBr)ofcompound1showedabsorptionsat 2948and2868cm−1 indicatingthepresenceofsp3 carbon;and
abroadbandat3401cm−1 characteristicofO H.1HNMR
spec-trum of 1 showed one terminal methylas a tripletat ıH 0.87
(3H, J=6.26Hz), multiplets for eight methylene hydrogens (ıH
1.24–1.69)andonemethylenegrouplinkedwithhydroxyl(ıH3.63
(t),J=6.56Hz).The13CNMRspectrumof1presentedeight
methy-lenecarbons(ıC32.77,25.72,31.92,29.70,29.61,29.42,29.36,and
22.69),onesignalinupfieldforonemethylcarbon(ıC14.13)and
onecarbonatıC63.09bondedtooxygen.Thespectraldataand
comparisonwithliteraturedata(Paviaetal.,2010)allowedto iden-tifythecompound1asthealiphaticalcoholdecanol,producedby plantswithecologicalrelevancebyactingasgrowthregulatorand commerciallyusedaspesticide(ArnandAcree,1998;EFSA,2010). TheIRspectrum(KBr)ofcompound2showedabsorptionsat 2918and2849cm−1(C-sp3);anintensebandat1771cm−1(C O),
andbandsat1448and1305cm−1(C C).The1HNMRspectrumof
2showedoneterminalmethylatıH0.87(3H,t,J=6.44Hz),
sig-nalsforthirteenmethylenehydrogens(ıH1.25–1.60)aswellasa
signalforanothermethyleneproton(H-2)nexttoacarbonyl(ıH
2.34,t,J=7.46Hz).The13CNMRspectrumof2exhibitedone
car-boxylgroup(ıC 180.29),signals tofourteenmethylene carbons
(ıH 34.07,31.92,29.69,29.59,29.69,29.43,29.24,29.36,29.05,
24.65,22.69),andonemethylcarbon(ıH14.13).Themassspectrum
(EI/MS)showedthemolecularionpeak(M−m/z)255.1,confirming
theidentityofcompound2 aspalmiticacid(Bangetal.,2002), afattyacidwidelyproducedandpreviouslyreportedfrommany speciesofCactaceae(López-Cervantesetal.,2011;Maywormetal., 1998).
deriva-Table1
1Hand13CNMR(C2D6OS,500and125MHz)spectraldataof9.
HMQC HMBC
ıC ıH 2J 3J
1/1′ 132.49 –
3/3′ 145.26 –
4/4′ 144.76 –
CH
2/2′ 113.75 6.72(s) C-4/C-6/C-7/C-4′/C-6′/C-7′
5/5′ 115.46 6.67(d,J=7.82Hz) C-1/C-3/C-1′/C-3′
6/6′ 117.24 6.59(d,J=7.82Hz) C-4/C-2/C-7/C-4′/C-2′/C-7′
7/7′ 85.19 4.52(d,J=2.88Hz) C-8/C-8′ C-8′/C-9/C-9′/C-2/C-6/C-2′/C-6′
8/8′ 53.70 2.93(sl) – –
CH2
9/9′ 70.58 4.07(dd,J=8.34and6.32Hz) C-8 C-7/C8′/C-7′
3.67(dd,J=8.34and2.20Hz)
tivesphaeophytinaandthe132-hydroxy-(132-S)-phaeophytina (Schwikkardetal.,1998;Jerzetal.,2007;Telesetal.,2014; Brito-Filhoetal.,2014).
Theanalysisofthespectraldataandcomparisonwithliterature (Kojimaetal.,1990;Liuetal.,2011)permittedtoidentifythe sub-stances5,7,10,11and12asknownsteroidsandtheirglucosyl derivatives.Thecompound5wasidentifiedas-sitosterol; com-pound 7 as sitosterol-3-O--d-glucopyranoside; the compound 10 was defines as a mixture of -sitosterol and stigmasterol; compound 11 was found to be a mixture of -sitosterol and ergosterol; and the compound 12 was identified as a mixture ofsitosterol-3-O--d-glucopyranosideandstigmasterol-3-O--d -glucopyranosoide.Theyhavebeenpreviouslyreportedfromother Cactaceaes such as Pilosocereus gounellei (Maciel et al., 2016). Steroidsare widelyspread in plants. Their biological relevance isrelatedtotheirrolecomposingthevegetablemembrane and cellwall,andasprecursorsofvitaminD.Theyhavebeenshown topossess anti-inflammatoryproperties,and manyofthem are
beingreportedaseffectiveagentstopreventcardiovascular dis-eases(Silvaetal.,2012).
Compound6wasobtainedasyellowcrystals.TheIR absorp-tionsindicatedthepeaksofaldehydecarbonyl(1670cm−1),C–O
(1038–1172cm−1)andaromaticbonds(1514cm−1and1423cm1).
The1HNMRspectrumpresentedthree singlets:onedeshielded
protonat ıH 9.92(1H) (s, H-7);the secondone indicating the
presenceoftwoequivalentmethoxygroupsatı4.07(6H)(s,OCH3 C-3/C-5)andthethirdoneinthearomaticzoneatı7.26(2H)(s, H-2/H-6).The13CNMRspectrumshowedsignalscompatiblewitha
1,3,4,5-tetrasubstitutedaromaticringwithchemicalandmagnetic equivalence.Thesubstituentsandpositionsare:hydroxylatC-4 (ıC140.75),methoxylatpositions3and5(ıC147.29),and
alde-hydegroupatC-1(ıC129.30).Thealdehydecarbonylwasfoundat
ıC190.78(C-7),twomethinecarbonsatıC106.63(C-2/C-6)anda
doubledsignalfortwomethoxygroupsatıC56.43(OCH3C-3/OCH3
C-5).
Thespectralandliteraturedata(Kimetal.,2003)ledto iden-tify the compound 6 as 4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde (syringaldehyde),aphenolicconstituentofthelignincellwallof plants.Theligninisresponsibleformechanicalsupportand vas-cular elements of plants, furthermore, the lignin is the source fromwhich syringaldehyde can beobtainedthrough enzimatic oxidation reactions (Aguiar and Ferraz, 2011; Ibrahim et al., 2012).
TheIRspectrumofcompound8showedabsorptions indicat-ingthepresenceofthefollowinggroups:carbonyl(1655cm−1),
C–O(1026–1126cm−1),aromaticbonds(1597and1516cm−1)and
hydroxyl(3354cm−1).The1HNMRspectrumpresentedone
sin-gletatıH3.50(s,2H)andtwodoubletsatı7.13(2H)andıH6.78
(2H)andJ=8.6Hz,suggestingandAA′BB′substitutedring.The13C
NMRspectrum of8arevealed6signals,fromwhich 3are non-hydrogenatedandacarbonylatıC173.29(C-8)characteristicof
carboxylicacid.Additionally,onedeshieldedaromaticcarbonwas foundatıC157.14(C-4).AcoupleofintensesignalsatıC131.15
(C-2/C-6)andıC115.91(C-3/C-5)confirmedtheAA′BB′systemand
thepeakatıC40.50wasattributedtothemethylenecarbon(C-7).
ThestructurewasconfirmedbythecorrelationsobservedatHMBC spectrum,identifyingthecompound8as4-hydroxyphenylacetic
Table2
MICvalues(g/ml)ofteststrainstoantibioticsintheabsenceandpresenceof4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxybenzaldehyde(syringaldehyde)–128g/ml.
Lineage/Antibiotic Antibioticisolated Antibiotic+syringaldehyde(1/4MIC)
IS-58/Tetracycline 64 4(32×)
RN-4220/Erythromycin ≥256 >256
acid(p-hydroxyphenylaceticacid).
The IR spectrum of compound 9 showed absorptions sug-gesting the presence of aromatic bonds(1450–1160cm−1) and hydroxylgroup(3450cm−1).The1HNMRspectrumshowed
aro-maticabsorptionsindicatingthepresenceofanABXsubstituted ring.Thefollowingsignalswereobserved:ıH6.67(d,J=7.82Hz, H-5/H-5′)couplingorthowithı
H6.59(d,J=7.82Hz,H-6/H-6′),a singletatıH6.72(H-2/H-2′),anoxymethinicprotonatıH4.52(d, J=2.88Hz,H-7/H-7′),oxymethylenicprotonsatı
H4.07(dd,J=8.34 and6,32Hz,H-9/H-9′)andı
H3.67(dd,J=8.34and2.20Hz, H-9/H-9′),andamethinehidrogenatı
H2.93(bs,H-8/H-8′).The13CNMR spectrumshowed9peaks,characteristicoflignans:sixaromatic carbonsıC145.26(C-3/C-3′),ıC144.76(C-4/C-4′),ıC132.49 (C-1/C-1′),ı
C117.24(C-6/C-6′),ıC115.46(C-5/C-5′),ıC113.75(C-2/C-2′); oneoxymethiniccarbonoatıC85,19(C-7/C-7′),oneoxymethylenic carbonıC70,58(C-9/C-9′),andonemethinicatıC53,70(C-8/C-8′). TheHSQCandHMBCdataareshowedinTable1.Thespectraldata combinedwithliteraturedata(Kamiyaetal.,2004)allowedto iden-tifythecompound9as3,3′-bisdemethylpinoresinol,thefirstlignan
isolatedfromspeciesofCactaceaefamily(Table1).
Modulationofbacterialresistance
The syringaldehyde modulated theactivity of antibiotics by reducing theconcentration ofantibiotic requiredto inhibitthe growthofdrug-resistantbacteria.Thefoundactivitymayberelated toitslipophilicity,acommonfeatureofseveralinhibitorsofefflux. Thisquality,aspointedoutbyGibbons(2004),isimportantforthe solubilityinthebacterialmembraneandfortheinteractionwith effluxtransporters.Thus,theresultspresentedhereindicatethat syringaldehydeisapromisingmoleculetobeusedasantibiotic adjuvant.
Conclusions
Thepresentstudycontributedtothechemotaxonomic knowl-edgeofCacteaceaefamilythroughtheisolationandidentification oftwelve substances fromP.pachycladus: an alcohol(decanol),
two fatty acids, two chlorophyll derivatives (pheophytin a and hydroxy-pheophytin a), five steroids, one phenolic alde-hyde (syringaldehyde), a phenolic acid (p-hydroxyphenylacetic acid) and a lignan (3,3′-bisdemethylpinoresinol). The
com-poundssyringaldehydeand3,3′-bisdemethylpinoresinolarebeing
reported for the first time from species of Cacteaceae family. Additionally, thesubstancesyringaldehydewasshowedtobea promising moleculetoreversebacterialresistancemediatedby effluxpump.
Authors’contributions
SGBF,JKSM,MMMSF,MDLFworkedontheextraction,partition andchromatographyprocedures.YCFT,OSC,RBF,MFVSworkedon spectroscopyandstructuralelucidation.PDFandLPFcontributedin plantcollection,identificationandherbariumconfection.JPSJand ICSCworkedonbiologicalassays.Alltheauthorshavereadthefinal manuscriptandapprovedthesubmission.
Ethicaldisclosures
Protectionofhumanandanimalsubjects. Theauthorsdeclare thatnoexperimentswereperformedonhumansoranimalsfor thisstudy.
Confidentialityofdata. Theauthorsdeclarethatnopatientdata appearinthisarticle.
Righttoprivacyandinformedconsent.Theauthorsdeclarethat nopatientdataappearinthisarticle.
Conflictsofinterest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
Acknowledgments
TheauthorsthanktoCAPES,CNPqandFAPESQ-PB.
References
Abud, H.F., Gonc¸alves, N.R., Reis, R.G.E., Pereira, D.S., Bezerra, A.M.E., 2010.
Germinac¸ão e expressão morfológica de frutos sementes e plântulas de PilosocereuspachycladusRitter.Rev.Cienc.Agron.41,468–474.
Aguiar,A.,Ferraz,A.,2011.Mecanismosenvolvidosnabiodegradac¸ãode
mate-riaislignocelulósicos e aplicac¸ões tecnológicas correlatas.Quim.Nova 34, 1729–1738.
Agra,M.F.,Silva,K.N.,Basílio,I.J.L.D.,Freitas,P.F.,Barbosa-Filho,J.M.,2008.Survey
ofmedicinalplantsusedintheregionNortheastofBrazil.Rev.Bras.Farmacogn. 18,472–508.
Arn,H.,Acree,T.E.,1998.Flavornet:adatabaseofaromacompoundsbasedonodor
potencyinnaturalproducts.Dev.FoodSci.40,27.
Bang,M.H.,Han,J.T.,Kim,H.Y.,Park,Y.D.,Park,C.H.,Lee,K.R.,Baek,N.I.,2002.
13-hydroxy-9Z,11E,15E-octadecatrienoicacidfromtheleavesofCucurbita moschata.Arch.Pharm.Res.25,438–440.
Brito-Filho,S.G.,Fernandes,M.G.,Chaves,O.S.,Chaves,M.C.O.,Araruna,F.B.,Eiras,
C., Leite, J.R.S.A., Agra,M.F., Braz-Filho, R.,Souza, M.F.V., 2014. Chemical
constituentsisolatedfromTurnerasubulataSMandelectrochemical character-izationofPhaeophytinb.Quim.Nova37,603–609.
Cavalcanti, N.B., Resende, G.M., 2013. Utilizac¸ão do xique-xique (Pilocereus
gounellei(A.WeberexK.Schum.) Bly.exRowl)naalimentac¸ãodos
ani-mais. Repositório Alice, Available at: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/
bitstream/doc/132831/1/OPB1201.pdf(accessed05.01.13).
CLSI,2005.PerformanceStandardsforAntimicrobialSusceptibilityTesting;
Fif-teenthInformationalSupplement.CLSI/NCCLSdocumentM100-S15.Clinical andLaboratoryStandardsInstitute/NCCLS,Wayne,PA.
EFSA,2010.Conclusiononthepeerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentofthe
Falcão-Silva,V.S.,Silva,V.A.,Souza,M.F.V.,Siqueira-Júnior,J.P.,2009.Modulationof drugresistanceinStaphylococcusaureusbyakaempferolglycosidefrom Heris-santiatiubae(Malvaceae).Phytother.Res.23,1367–1370.
Gibbons,S.,2004.Anti-staphylococcalplantnaturalproducts.Nat.Prod.Rep.21,
263–277.
Hernández-Hernández,T.,Hernández,H.M.,De-Nova,J.A.,Puente,R.,Eguiarte,L.E.,
Magallón,S.,2011.Phylogeneticrelationshipsandevolutionofgrowthformin
Cactaceae(Caryophyllales,Eudicotyledoneae).Am.J.Bot.98,44–61.
Hunt,D.,Taylor,N.P.,Charles,G.,2006.TheNewCactusLexicon:Descriptionsand
IllustrationsoftheCactusFamily.DHBooks,MilbornePort,UK.
Ibrahim,M.N.M.,Sriprasanthi,R.B.,Shamsudeen,S.,Adam,F.,Bhawani,S.A.,2012.
Syringaldehyde:review.BioResources7,4377–4399.
Jerz,G.,Arrey,T.N.,Wray,V.,Du,Q.,Winterhalter,P.,2007.Characterizationof132
-hydroxy-(132-S)-phaeophytin-AfromleavesandstemsofAmaranthustricolor isolatedbyhigh-speedcountercurrentchromatography.Innov.FoodSci.Emerg. Technol.8,413–418.
Kamiya,K.,Tanaka,Y.,Endang,H.,Umar,M.,Satake,T.,2004.Chemicalconstituents
ofMorindacitrifoliafruitsinhibitcopper-inducedlow-densitylipoprotein oxi-dation.J.Agric.FoodChem.52,5843–5848.
Kim,H.,Ralph,J.,Lu,F.,Ralph,S.A.,Boudet,A.M.,MacKay,J.J.,Sederoff,R.R.,Ito,T.,
Kawai,S.,Ohashi,H.,Higuchi,T.,2003.NMRanalysisofligninsinCAD-deficient
plants.Part1.Incorporationofhydroxycinnamaldehydesand hydroxybenzalde-hydesintolignins.Org.Biomol.Chem.1,268–281.
Kojima,H.,Sato,N.,Hatano,A.,Ogura,H.,1990.SterolglucosidesfromPrunella
vulgaris.Phytochemistry29,2351–2355.
Liu,Y.P.,Cai,X.H.,Feng,T.,Li,Y.,Li,X.N.,Luo,X.D.,2011.Triterpeneandsterol
derivativesfromtherootsofBreyniafruticosa.J.Nat.Prod.74,1161–1168.
López-Cervantes,J.,Sánchez-Machado,D.I.,Campas-Baypoli,O.N.,Bueno-Solano,C.,
2011.Functionalpropertiesandproximatecompositionofcactuspearcladodes
flours.Ciênc.Tecnol.Aliment.31,654–659.
Lucena,C.M.,Lucena,R.F.P.,Costa,G.M.,Carvalho,T.K.N.,Costa,G.G.S.,Alves,R.R.N.,
Pereira,D.D.,Ribeiro,J.E.S.,Alves,C.A.B.,Quirino,C.G.M.,Nunes,E.N.,2013.Use
andknowledgeofCactaceaeinNortheasternBrazil.J.Ethnobiol.Ethnomed.9, 62.
Maciel,J.K.S.,Chaves,O.S.,BritoFilho,S.G.,Teles,Y.C.F.,Fernandes,M.G.,Assis,
T.S.,Fernandes,P.D.,Andrade,A.P.,Felix,L.P.,Silva,T.M.S.,Ramos,N.S.M.,Silva,
G.R.,Souza,M.F.V.,2016.Newalcamideandanti-oxidantactivityofPilosocereus
gounelleiA.WeberexK.Schum.Bly.exRowl.(Cactaceae).Molecules21,1–13.
Mayworm,M.A.S.,Nascimento,A.S.,Salatino,A.,1998.Seedsofspeciesfromthe
‘caatinga’:proteins,oilsandfattyacidcontents.Rev.Bras.Bot.21,299–303.
Pavia,D.L.,Lampman,G.M.,Kriz,G.S.,Vyvyan,J.R.,2010.Introduc¸ãoàEspectroscopia,
4thed.CengageLearningPublishingHouse,SãoPaulo,Brazil.
Piddock,L.J.V.,2006.Clinicallyrelevantchromosomallyencodedmultidrug
resis-tanceeluxpumpsinbacteria.Clin.Microbiol.Rev.19,382–402.
Sanchez,E.,Dávila-Avina,J.,Castillo,S.L.,Heredia,N.,Vazquez-Alvarado,R.,García,S.,
2014.Antibacterialandantioxidantactivitiesinextractsoffullygrowncladodes
of8cultivarsofcactuspear.J.FoodSci.79,659–664.
Schwikkard,S.L.,Mulholland,D.A.,Hutchings,A.,1998.PhaeophytinsfromTapura
fisheri.Phytochemistry49,2391–2394.
Silva,S.M.F.Q.,Botelho,S.M.,Pinheiro,M.V.,Ferreira,Q.M.C.,Pranchevicius,J.G.,Díaz
Castro,M.C.P.,Carreiro,C.S.,2012.Atividadeinvitrodeextratosbrutosdeduas
espéciesvegetaisdocerradosobrelevedurasdogêneroCandida.Cienc.Saude Coletiva17,1649–1656.
Teles,Y.C.F.,Gomes,R.A.,Oliveira,M.S.,Lucena,K.L.,Nascimento,J.S.,Agra,M.F.,Igoli,
J.O.,Gray,A.I.,Souza,M.F.V.,2014.PhytochemicalinvestigationofWissadula
periplocifolia(L.)C.Preslandevaluationofitsantibacterialactivity.Quim.Nova 37,1491–1495.
Zappi, D., Taylor, N., Machado, M., 2010. Cactaceae in Lista de
Espé-cies da Flora do Brasil. Botanical Garden of Rio de Janeiro,