Quanto menor o Mean Deviation (MD), ou seja, quanto maior o defeito de CV,

menor a Velocidade Máxima de Leitura (VML), maior o Tamanho Crítico de Letra (TCL) e maior a Acuidade de Leitura (AL) destes pacientes.

REFERÊNCIAS

1. Douglas GR, Drance SM, Schulzer M. A correlation of fields and discs in open angle glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 1974; 9(4):391-8.

2. Drance SM. Correlation between optic disc changes and visual field defects in chronic open-angle glaucoma. Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acada Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1976; 81(2):224-6.

3. Barkan O. Glaucoma: classification, causes, and surgical control. Results of microgonioscopic research. Am J Ophthalmol 1938; 21(10):1099-117.

4. Casson RJ, Chidlow G, Wood JP, Crowston JG, Goldberg I. Definition of glaucoma: clinical and experimental concepts. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology. 2012; 40(4):341-9.

5. Leske MC, Connell AM, Schachat AP, Hyman L. The Barbados Eye Study. Prevalence of open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994; 112(6):821-9.

6. Wensor MD, McCarty CA, Stanislavsky YL, Livingston PM, Taylor HR. The prevalence of glaucoma in the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project. Ophthalmology. 1998; 105(4):733-9.

7. Quigley HA, West SK, Rodriguez J, Munoz B, Klein R, Snyder R. The prevalence of glaucoma in a population-based study of Hispanic subjects: Proyecto VER. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001; 119(12): 1819-26.

8. Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Alsbirk PH, Munkhbayar D, Uranchimeg D, Johnson GJ. Glaucoma in Mongolia. A population-based survey in Hovsgol province, northern Mongolia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996; 114(10):1235-41.

9. Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, Royall RM, Quigley HA, Javitt J. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA. 1991; 266(3):369-74.

10. Klein BE, Klein R, Sponsel WE, Franke T, Cantor LB, Martone J, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1992; 99(10):1499-504.

11. Dielemans I, Vingerling JR, Wolfs RC, Hofman A, Grobbee DE, de Jong PT. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in a population-based study in

The Netherlands. The Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology. 1994;

101(11):1851-5.

12. Mason RP, Kosoko O, Wilson MR, Martone JF, Cowan CL Jr, Gear JC, et al. National survey of the prevalence and risk factors of glaucoma in St. Lucia, West Indies. Part I. Prevalence findings. Ophthalmology. 1989; 96(9):1363-8.

13. Bahrami H. Causal inference in primary open angle glaucoma: specific discussion on intraocular pressure. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2006; 13(4):283-9.

14. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120(6):714-20.

15. Clinical epidemiology of glaucoma. In: Allingham RR, Damji KF, Freedman S, Moroi SE, Shafranov G, Shields MB. Shields tratado de glaucoma. Quinta edição. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005; 170-90.

16. Johnson CA, Keltner JL. Computer analysis of visual field loss and optimization of automated perimetric test strategies. Ophthalmology. 1981; 88(10):1058-65.

17. Drance SM. Doyne memorial lecture, 1975. Correlation of optic nerve and visual field defects in simple glaucoma. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1975; 95(2):288-96.

18. Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Cello KE, Edwards MA, Bandermann SE, Kass MA, et al. Classification of visual field abnormalities in .the ocular hypertension treatment study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003; 121(5):643-50

19. Sihota R, Gupta V, Tuli D, Sharma A, Sony P, Srinivasan G. Classifying patterns of localized glaucomatous visual field defects on automated perimetry. J Glaucoma. 2007; 16(1):146-52.

20. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90(3):262-7.

21. Sakata K, Sakata LM, Sakata VM, Santini C, Hopker LM, Bernardes R, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in a South brazilian population: Projeto Glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48(11):4974-9.

22. Varma R, Lee PP, Goldberg I, Kotak S. An assessment of the health and economic burdens of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011; 152(4):515-22.

23. Rein DB, Zhang P, Wirth KE, Lee PP, Hoerger TJ, McCall N, et al. The economic burden of major adult visual disorders in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006; 124(12):1754-60.

24. Organização Mundial da Saúde. Visual impairment and blindness. Fact Sheet Number 282. 2011: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/en/

25. Rudnicka AR, Mt-Isa S, Owen CG, Cook DG, Ashby D. Variations in primary open-angle glaucoma prevalence by age, gender, and race: a Bayesian meta-analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47(10):4254-61.

26. Leske MC, Wu SY, Hennis A, Honkanen R, Nemesure B; BESs Study Group. Risk factors for incident open-angle glaucoma. The Barbados Eye Studies. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115(1):85-93.

27. David R, Zangwill L, Stone D, Yassur Y. Epidemiology of intraocular pressure in a population screened for glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987; 71(10):766-71.

28. Gohdes DM, Balamurugan A, Larsen B, Maylahn C. Age-related eye diseases: an emerging challenge for public health professionals. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005; 2(3):A17.

29. Friedman DS, Wolfs RC, O'Colmain BJ, Klein BE, Taylor HR, West S, et al. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004; 122(4):532-8.

30. Wadhwa SD, Higginbotham EJ. Ethnic differences in glaucoma: prevalence, management, and outcome. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005; 16(2):101-6.

31. Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, Royall RM, Quigley HA, Javitt J. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA. 1991; 266(3):369-74.

32. Hiller R, Kahn HA. Blindness from glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975; 80(1):62-9.

33. Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, Gottsch JD, Javitt JC. Racial differences in the cause-specific prevalence of blindness in East-Baltimore. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325(20):1412-7.

34. The AGIS Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 4. Comparison of treatment outcomes within race: seven-year result. Ophthalmology. 1998; 105(7):1146-64.

35. Varma R, Ying-Lai M, Francis BA, Nguyen BB, Deneen J, Wilson MR, et al. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111(8):1439-48.

36. Leske MC. Open-angle glaucoma - an epidemiologic overview. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007; 14(4):166-72.

37. Rosenthal AR, Perkins ES. Family studies in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985; 69(9):664-7.

38. Nguyen RL, Raja SC, Traboulsi EI. Screening relatives of patients with familial chronic open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107(7):1294-7.

39. Leske MC, Nemesure B, He Q, Wu SY, Fielding Hejtmancik J, Hennis A. Patterns of open-angle glaucoma in the Barbados Family Study. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108(6):1015-22.

40. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Sommer A, Quigley HA, Javitt JC. Family history and risk of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994; 112(1):69-73.

41. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol Bull. 1998; 124(3):372-422.

42. Radach R, Kennedy A. Eye movements in reading: some theoretical context. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2013; 66(3):429-52.

43. Dehaene S. (2009). Reading in the brain: The new science of how we read. New York: Viking.

44. Cohen L, Lehericy S, Chochon F, Lemer C, Rivaud S, Dehaene. Language- specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the visual word form area. Brain. 2002; 125(5):1054-69.

45. He S, Liu H, Jiang Y, Chen C, Gong Q, Weng X. Transforming a left lateral fusiform region into VWFA through training in illiterate adults [Abstract]. Journal of Vision. 2009; 9(8):853.

46. Higgins KE, Bailey IL. Visual disorders and performance of specific tasks requiring vision. The Lighthouse Handbook on Vision Impairment and Vision Rehabilitation. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000;287-93.

47. Legge GE, Ross JA, Isenberg LM, LaMay JM. Psychophysics of reading. Clinical predictors of low-vision reading speed. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33(3):677-87.

48. Legge GE, Klitz TS, Tjan BS. Mr Chips: an ideal-observer model of reading. Psychological Review, 1997; 104(3):524-53.

49. Tinker MA. Legibility of print. 1963. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

50. Legge GE. Psychophysics of reading in normal and low vision. 2007. Mahwah, NJ & London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

51. Legge GE, Pelli DG, Rubin GS, Schleske MM. Psychophysics of reading. I. Normal vision. Vision Research. 1985; 25(2):239-52.

52. Tinker MA, Paterson DG. Studies of typographical factors influencing speed of reading. VII. Variations in color of print and background. J Appl Psychol. 1931; 15(5):471-9.

53. Convocation of the General Conference on Weights and Measures (25th meeting). International Bureau of Weights and Measures. p.32. Acessado em 02.11.2014: http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/25th-CGPM- Convocation.pdf#page=32.

54. McGreevy T, Cunningham P. The Basis of Measurement: Volume 2 - Metrication and Current Practice. Pitcon Publishing (Chippenham) Ltd. 1997; 222-4.

55. Legge GE, Rubin GS, Schleske MM. Contrast polarity effects in low vision reading. In: Woo GC, ed. Low Vision: Principles and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag. 1987; 288-307.

56. Legge GE, Rubin GS, Pelli DG, Schleske MM. Psychophysics of reading-II. Low vision. Vision Res. 1985; 25(2):253-65.

57. Whittaker SG, Lovie-Kitchin J. Visual requirements for reading. Optom Vis Sci. 1993; 70(1):54-65.

58. Legge GE, Ross JA, Maxwell KT, Luebker A. Psychophysics of reading: VII. Comprehension in normal and low vision. Clinical Vision Sciences 1989; 4(1)-51-60.

59. Mansfield JS, Legge GE, Luebker A, Cunningham K. MNREAD ACUITY CHARTS Continuous-text reading-acuity charts for normal and low vision - 1994; Disponível em: http://gandalf.psych.umn.edu/groups/gellab/MNREAD/ mnread.pdf (Acessado em 28 de setembro de 2014).

60. Binns AM, Bunce C, Dickinson C, Harper R, Tudor-Edwards R, Woodhouse M, et al. How effective is low vision service provision? A systematic review. Survey of Ophthalmology. 2012; 57(1):34-65.

61. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Laser photocoagulation of subfoveal neovascular lesions in age-related macular degeneration: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991; 109(9):1220-31.

62. Hawkins BS, Miskala PH, Bass EB, Bressler NM, Childs AL, Mangione CM, et al. Surgical removal vs. observation for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization, either associated with the ocular histoplasmosis syndrome or idiopathic: II. Quality-of-life findings from a randomized clinical trial: SST Group H Trial: SST Report No. 10. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004; 122(11):1616-28.

63. Tufail A, Patel PJ, Egan C, Hykin P, da Cruz L, Gregor Z, et al. Bevacizumab for neovascular age related macular degeneration (ABC Trial): Multicentre randomised double masked study. BMJ. 2010; 340:c2459.

64. Akutsu H, Legge GE, Showalter M, Lindstrom RL, Zabel RW, Kirby VM. Contrast sensitivity and reading through multifocal intraocular lenses. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992; 110(8):1076-80.

65. Runge PE. Eduard Jaeger’s Test-Types (Schrift-Scalen) and the historical development of vision tests. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2000; 98:375-438.

66. Jose RT, Atcherson RM. Type-size variability for near-point acuity tests. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1997; 54(9):634-8.

67. Sloan LL, Brown DJ. Reading cards for selection of optical aids for the partially sighted. Am J Ophthalmol. 1963; 55(6):1187-99.

68. Bailey IL, Lovie JE. The design and use of a new near-vision chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980; 57(6):378-87.

69. Baldasare J, Watson GR, Whittaker SG, Miller-Shaffer H. The development and evaluation of a reading test for low vision individuals with macular loss. J Vis Impair Blind. 1986; 80(6):785-9.

70. Hahn GA, Penka D, Gehrlich C, Messias A, Weismann M, Hyvärinen L, et al. New standardised texts for assessing reading performance in four European languages. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90(4):480-4.

71. Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Dietz K, IReST Study Group. Standardized assessment of reading performance: The new international reading speed texts IReST. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53(9):5452-61.

72. The COLENBRANDER Low Vision Measurement System. Disponível em: http://www.ski.org/Colenbrander/Images/LV_system.pdf Acessado em 20 de novembro de 2014.

73. Forster KI. Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Attention, Atten Percept Psychophys. 1970; 8(4):215-21.

74. Rubin GS, Turano K. Low vision reading with sequential word presentation. Vision Res. 1994; 34(13):1723-33.

75. Radner W, Willinger U, Obermayer W, Mudrich C, Velikay-Parel M, Eisenwort B. [A new reading chart for simultaneous determination of reading vision and reading speed]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1998; 213(3):174-81.

76. Legge GE, Ross JA, Luebker A, LaMay JM. Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test. Optom Vis Sci. 1989; 66(12):843-53.

77. Ahn SJ, Legge GE, Luebker A. Printed cards for measuring low-vision reading speed. Vision Res. 1995; 35(3):1939-44.

78. Mansfield JS, Legge GE, Luebker A, Cunningham K. MNRead Acuity Charts Regents of the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Disponível em: http://legge.psych.umn.edu/mnread/index.html. Acessado em 4 de setembro de 2014.

79. Castro CT, Kallie CS, Salomao SR. Elaboração e validação de tabela MNREAD para o idioma português. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2005; 68(6):777-83.

80. Dietzch MJM. Um texto. Vários autores. Relações fala-escrita em textos de crianças das séries iniciais do primeiro grau [tese]. São Paulo (SP): Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de São Paulo; 1988.

81. Rodrigues AJ. Produção linguística de crianças de seis anos: estudo comparativo do desempenho em situações e classes sociais diferentes [tese]. São Paulo (SP): Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de São Paulo; 1992.

82. Barrera SD. Linguagem oral e alfabetização: um estudo sobre variação linguística e consciência metalinguística em crianças da 1ª série do ensino fundamental [tese]. São Paulo (SP): Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de São Paulo; 2000.

83. Capovilla FC, Capovilla AGS. O desenvolvimento dos vocábulos receptivo e expressivo em crianças brasileiras. Rev Interamer Psicol. 1998; 32(1)33-49.

84. Chung S, Mansfield JS, Legge GE. Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision. Vision Research 1998; 38(19):2949-62.

85. Ramulu PY, Swenor BK, Jefferys JL, Rubin GS. Description and validation of a test to evaluate sustained silent reading. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54(1):673-80.

86. Whittaker SG, Lovie-Kitchin JAN. Visual requirements for reading. Optom Vis Sci. 1993; 70(1):54-65.

87. Fine SL, Berger JW, Maguire MG, Ho AC. Age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342(7):483-92.

88. Ramulu PY, West SK, Munoz B, Jampel HD, Friedman DS. Glaucoma and reading speed: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation project. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009; 127(1):82-7.

89. Nelson P, Aspinall P, O’Brien C. Patients’ perception of visual impairment in

glaucoma: a pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83(5):546-52.

90. Glen FC, Crabb DP, Garway-Heath DF. The direction of research into visual disability and quality of life in glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol 2011; 11:19.

91. Spaeth G, Walt J, Keener J. Evaluation of quality of life for patients with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 141(1 Suppl):S3-14.

92. Gutierrez P, Wilson MR, Johnson C, Gordon M, Cioffi GA, Ritch R, et al. Influence of glaucomatous visual field loss on health-related quality of life. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 115(6):777-84.

93. Parrish RK 2nd. Visual impairment, visual functioning, and quality of life assessments in patients with glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1996; 94:919-1028.

94. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, Lawrence MG, Cook EF, Dailey R, et al. Development of the ‘Activities of Daily Vision Scale’: a measure of visual functional status. Med Care 1992; 30(12):1111-26.

95. Steinberg EP, Tielsch JM, Schein OD, Javitt JC, Sharkey P, Cassard SD, et al. The VF-14, an index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 1994; 112(5):630-8.

96. Mangione CM, Berry S, Spritzer K, Janz NK, Klein R, Owsley C, et al. Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116(2):227-33.

97. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, Spritzer K, Berry S, Hays RD, et al. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119(7):1050-8.

98. Massof RW, Hsu CT, Baker FH, Barnett GD, Park WL, Deremeik JT, et al. Visual disability variables. I: The importance and difficulty of activity goals for a sample of low-vision patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86(5):946-53.

99. McAlinden C, Pesudovs K, Moore JE. The development of an instrument to measure quality of vision: the Quality of Vision (QoV) Questionnaire. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51(11):5537-45.

100. Simão LM, Lana-Peixoto MA, Araújo CR, Moreira MA, Teixeira AL. Versão brasileira do questionário de função visual de 25 itens do questionário do National Eye Institute: tradução, confiabilidade e validação. Arq. Bras. Oftalmolol. 2008; 71(4):540-6.

101. McKean-Cowdin R, Wang Y, Wu J, Azen SP, Varma R; Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. Impact of visual field loss on health-related quality of life in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2008; 115(6):941-8.

102. Aspinall PA, Johnson ZK, Azuara-Blanco A, Montarzino A, Brice R, Vickers A. Evaluation of quality of life and priorities of patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49(5):1907-15.

103. Nguyen AM, van Landingham SW, Massof RW, Rubin GS, Ramulu PY. Reading ability and reading engagement in older adults with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014; 55(8):5284-90.

104. Massof RW, Ahmadian L, Grover LL, Deremeik JT, Goldstein JE, Rainey C. The Activity Inventory (AI): an adaptive visual function questionnaire. Optom Vis Sci. 2007; 84(8):763-74.

105. Parrish RK 2nd, Gedde SJ, Scott IU, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC, Mangione CM, et al. Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 115(11):1447-55.

106. Noe G, Ferraro J, Lamoureux E, Rait J, Keeffe JE. Associations between glaucomatous visual field loss and participation in activities of daily living. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2003; 31(6):482-6.

107. Jampel HD. Glaucoma patients’ assessment of their visual function and

quality of life. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2001; 99:301-17.

108. Fujita K, Yasuda N, Oda K, Yuzawa M. Reading performance in patients with central visual field disturbance due to glaucoma. Nihon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2006; 110(11):914-8.

109. Ramulu PY, West SK, Munoz B, Jampel HD, Friedman DS. Glaucoma and reading Speed: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project. Arch Ophthalmol 2009; 127(1):82-7.

110. Burton R, Smith ND, Crabb DP. Eye movements and reading in glaucoma: observations on patients with advanced visual field loss. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014; 252(10):1621-30.

111. Ishii M, Seki M, Harigai R, Abe H, Fukuchi T. Reading performance in

patients with glaucoma evaluated using the MNREAD charts.

Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2013; 57(5):471-4.

112. National Research Council Committee on Vision. Recommended standard procedures for the clinical measurement and specification of visual acuity. Adv Ophthalmol. 1980; 41:103-48.

113. Freeman EE, Muñoz B, West SK, Jampel HD, Friedman DS. Glaucoma and quality of life: the Salisbury Eye Evaluation. Ophthalmology 2008; 115(2):233-8.

114. Maaijwee K, Mulder P, Radner W, Van Meurs JC. Reliability testing of the Dutch version of the Radner Reading Charts. Optom Vis Sci. 2008; 85(5):353-8.

115. Subramanian A, Pardhan S. The repeatability of MNREAD acuity charts and variability at different test distances. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83(8):572-6.

116. Duponsel N, Overbury O. Binocular Rivalry: the effect of ocular dominance and interocular rivalry on monocular reading speed under near-normal, ganzfeld, and complete occlusion conditions. J Vis 2005; 5:11.

117. Virgili G, Pierrottet C, Parmeggiani F, Pennino M, Giacomelli G, Steindler P, et al. Reading performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a study using the MNREAD charts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sc. 2004; 45(10):3418-24.

118. O’Brien BA, Mansfield JS, Legge GE. The effect of print size on reading

speed in dyslexia. J Res Read 2005; 28(3):332-49.

119. Merrill K, Hogue K, Downes S, Holleschau AM, Kutzbach BR, MacDonald JT, et al. Reading acuity in albinism: evaluation with MNREAD charts. J AAPOS 2011; 15(1):29-32.

120. Ramulu PY, Swenor BK, Jefferys JL, Rubin GS. Description and validation of a test to evaluate sustained silent reading. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54(1):673-80.

121. Ramulu PY, Swenor BK, Jefferys JL, Friedman DS, Rubin GS. Difficulty with out-loud and silent reading in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54(1):666-72.

122. West SK, Rubin GS, Munoz B, Abraham D, Fried LP. Assessing functional status: correlation between performance on tasks conducted in a clinic setting and performance on the same task conducted at home. The Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project Team. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1997; 52(4):M209-17.

APÊNDICE 1

TERMO DE CONSENTIMENTO APLICADO AOS