• Nenhum resultado encontrado

The importance of prognostic markers of tumor progression Ki-67 and р53 in the breast cancer

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "The importance of prognostic markers of tumor progression Ki-67 and р53 in the breast cancer"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texto

(1)

__________________________________________________________________________________ • 2007 • • №1

40

. .

. .

I-67 53

:

-,

-,

-,

, .

ɇɚɞɿɣɲɥɚ: 28.10.2006 ɉɪɢɣɧɹɬɚ: 17.11.2006

.

,

-,

-.

53- Ki-67 (

-) ,

, . 300

5 ( -

ER, Pg; HER-2/neu; p53- ,

p2), 150 7 ( Ki-67, bcl-2).

. ,

53- .

,

,

.

Bondareva V.A., Shponka I.S. The importance of prognostic markers of tumor progression Ki-67 and 53 in the breast cancer

Summary. The increase of morbidity and invalidization frequency of patients with the breast cancer stipulates a necessity to find of the new diagnostic ways and prognostic markers with the aim for early diagnostic, optimization and individual way of therapy that will allow to improve the quality of life, patients’ physical and social reabilitation. The purpose of our investiga-tion was to estimate an expression of important biological markers of tumor’s bihavior – p53 and Ki-67 (proliferative markers) at women suffering from breast cancer of different age by immunohistochemical method. We have examined 300 women with 5 markers (estrogen and progesteron receptors - ER, PgR; human epidermal growth factor receptor HER-2/neu; p53-oncoprotein, presenolin pS2), and 150 women with 7 markers (additionally Ki-67, bcl-2). Our data suggests that the prolifera-tive activity of breast cancer cells is higher at patients with metastasis. Besides, we have estimated correlation between young age of women and p53-pozitive status. Thus, it allows their using as independent prognostic markers which are evidence of high metastatic and invasive tumor potential.

Key words: proliferative potential, prognostic markers, immunohistochemical methods, biological properties of tumor, onco-proteins.

( . ., 2002; Esteva F., Hortobagyi G., 2004; Goradini D., Diadone

M., 2004).

-,

,

Ki-67, ,

-,

– 53, bcl-2 ( . ., . ., 2002; Allred D.C. et al., 1993; Thor A. et al., 1992; Elledge R. et al., 1997).

-, ,

-,

(

-), –

24 ,

Ki-67 ( ),

-,

G0-,

" "

,

(Keshgegian A., Cnaan A., 1995; Molino A. et al., 1997).

,

,

.

-,

-,

(2)

,

( . ., . ., 2001; . ., . ., 2004; Dabbs D., 2002).

Fitzgibbons et al. (2000)

(≥1%, ≥10%, ≥20% ),

Ki-67 20%

-.

(mt) 53

-,

, « »

( . ., 2000; Surowiak P. et al., 2001; Ruibal A. et al., 2000). 53

,

,

-

(Thor A. et al., 1992; O’Malley F. et al., 1994).

-,

,

.

-№4.

300 5 (

- ER, PgR;

HER-2/neu;

p53-, pS2), 150

7 (

- ER, PgR;

HER-2/neu; p53- , pS2,

Ki-67, bcl-2 ( ),

2006 .

Ki-67 53-

.

10%

( . .,

. ., 2004; Dabbs D., 2002; Ikeda K., Inoue S.,

2004). 4-5

-, .

=6,0

10

1210 1

.

,

(Ki-67,

MIB-1, DAKO; 53, DO-7, DAKO).

,

LSAB2 (

),

DAB ( ).

. Ki-67 -53

,

-,

( .1.).

Ɋɢɫ.1. əɪɤɚɹ ɩɨɡɢɬɢɜɧɚɹɢɧɬɪɚɧɭɤɥɟɚɪɧɚɹɪɟɚɤɰɢɹɫ Ki-67. ɂɦɦɭɧɨɝɢɫɬɨɯɢɦɢɱɟɫɤɢɣ ɦɟɬɨɞ, ɞɨɩɨɥɧɢɬɟɥɶɧɨɟɨɤɪɚ

-ɲɢɜɚɧɢɟɝɟɦɚɬɨɤɫɢɥɢɧɨɦɆɚɣɟɪɚ. ×400.

__________________________________________________________________________________ • 2007 • • №1

(3)

53 ,

-.

-,

60

(ARUP),

(

3 ).

5% ,

,

53-. 53- : 1)

50%

; 2) (3+)

5% ; 3) 10%

50% ( .2.).

Ɋɢɫ.2. əɪɤɚɹɩɨɡɢɬɢɜɧɚɹɪɟɚɤɰɢɹɫɪ53-ɨɧɤɨɩɪɨɬɟɢɧɨɦ. ɂɦɦɭɧɨɝɢɫɬɨɯɢɦɢɱɟɫɤɢɣɦɟɬɨɞ, ɞɨɩɨɥɧɢɬɟɥɶɧɨɟɨɤɪɚɲɢɜɚ

-ɧɢɟɝɟɦɚɬɨɤɫɢɥɢɧɨɦɆɚɣɟɪɚ. ×1000.

300 5

150 7 (450) ,

53- 113

(25,11%) ( .1.).

1.

53-.

53+

30 16 (48%)

31 40 75 (39,2%)

41 60 20 (9,8%)

60 58 (3%)

113 (25,11%)

,

53-

-,

-, ,

.

,

Ki-67

.

Ki-67

,

( .2.).

( )

,

, ,

Ki-67

,

« ».

-, ,

Ki-67 10%

(4)

2.

Ki-67

.

Σ

10% 2 (4,4%) 7 (6,8%) 9 (6%)

10% 20% 6 (12,7%) 18 (17,4%) 24 (16%)

20% 39 (82,9%) 78 (75,8%) 117 (78%)

47 (100%) 103 (100%) 15 (100%)

(

-, III

-, Ki-67

20%)

-. , ,

Ki-67 53,

-,

-.

, ,

,

: ,

,

. ,

-.

, 53 Ki-67

-,

.

, 53

Ki-67 ,

,

-.

.

-.

,

-,

.

. .

//

. .- 2002.- .3, №1.- .15-20.

. ., . .

// . o .- 2002.- .3, №1.- .38-44.

. ., . .

« »

// . .- 2001.- №9.- .65-70.

. ., . .

.- , 2004.- 452 .

. .

// . .- 2000.- №.2.- .26-30.

Accumulation of mutant p53 is associated with increased proliferation and poor clinical outcome in node negative breast cancer / Allred D. et al. // J. Natl. Cancer Inst.- 1993.- Vol.85.- P.200-206.

Accumulation of p53 tumor suppressor gene

pro-tein: an independent marker of prognosis in breast cancers / Thor A.D. et al. // J. Natl. Cancer Inst.- 1992.- №84.- P.845-855.

Analysis of five-year course of the disease / Su-rowiak P. et al. // Folia Histochem. Cytobiol.- 2001.- Vol.39, №2.- P.143-144.

bcl-2, p53, and response to tamoxifen in estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a South-west Oncology Group study / Elledge R.M. et al. // J. Clin. Oncol.- 1997.- Vol.15.- P.1916-1922.

Clinico-biological impact of pS2 positivity in es-trogen receptor negative-infiltrating ductal carcino-mas of the breast / Ruibal A. et al. // Rev. Esp. Med. Nucl.- 2000.- Vol.19, №6.- P.428-433.

Dabbs D. Diagnostic immunohistochemistry.- Churchill Livingstone, 2002.- 676 p.

Esteva F., Hortobagyi G. Prognostic markers in early breast cancer // Breast Cancer Res.- 2004.- Vol.6, №3.- P.109-118.

Goradini D., Diadone M. Biomolecular prognos-tic factors in breast cancer // Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gy-necol.- 2004.- Vol.16., №1.- P.49-55.

(5)

__________________________________________________________________________________ • 2007 • • №1

44

downstream targets in cancer // Arch. Histol. Cytol.- 2004.- Vol.67, №5.- P.435-442.

Keshgegian A., Cnaan A. Proliferation markers in breast carcinoma: mitotic figure count, S-phase fraction, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, Ki-67 and MIB-1 // Am. J. Clin. Pathol.- 1995.- Vol.104.- P.42-49.

Ki-67 immunostaining in 322 primary breast cancers: association with clinical and pathological variables and prognosis / Molino A., Micciolo R., Turazza M. et al. // Int. J. Cancer.- 1997.- Vol.74.-

P.433-437.

P53 mutations are confined to the comedo type ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: immunohisto-chemical and sequencing data / O’Malley F. et al. // Lab. Invest.- 1994.- №71.- P.67-72.

Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer / Fitzgibbons M. et al. // Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med.- 2000.- Vol.124.- P.966-978.

Wysocki S., Iacopetta B., Ingram D. Prognostic significance of pS2 mRNA in breast cancer // Eur. J. Cancer.- 1994.- Vol.30A, №12.- P.1882-1884.

є . ., . . i-67 53

.

. є

, є

-, є

є .

53- Ki-67 (

-) , ,

-. 300 5 (

- ER, PgR; HER-2/neu; p53- , pS2), 150

7 ( Ki-67, bcl-2).

. ,

53- . , є

,

-.

: , , ,

Referências

Documentos relacionados

1. Value of Ki-67 immunolabelling as a prognostic factor in prostate cancer. Alterations of proliferation and apoptotic markers in normal and premalignant tissue

Between the groups studied, the following was also analyzed: the profile of the expression of molecular markers such as PSA, E-caderin, chromogranin-A, synaptofisin, P53 and Ki-67,

To determine the expression of p53, p16 and Ki-67 and its relevance in survival and cell differentiation and compare the results of combined and isolated

The probability of attending school four our group of interest in this region increased by 6.5 percentage points after the expansion of the Bolsa Família program in 2007 and

Between the groups studied, the following was also analyzed: the profile of the expression of molecular markers such as PSA, E-caderin, chromogranin-A, synaptofisin, P53 and Ki-67,

Raramente sabemos quem são essas mulheres, seu nível sócio-econômico, os motivos para deixarem seu filho, sua idade, se entregou outras crianças, seus familiares, sua história de

Ousasse apontar algumas hipóteses para a solução desse problema público a partir do exposto dos autores usados como base para fundamentação teórica, da análise dos dados

The purpose of this study was to com- pare the expression of tumor suppressor gene p53, proliferation marker Ki-67, and oncogene c-erbB2 and to evaluate the relevance of