ContentslistsavailableatSciVerseScienceDirect
Peptides
jo u r n al h om ep ag e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / p e p t i d e s
Evidence
that
kinin
B
2
receptor
expression
is
upregulated
by
endothelial
overexpression
of
B
1
receptors
Eliete
S.
Rodrigues
a,
Rafael
F.
Silva
a,
Renan
P.
Martin
a,
Suzana
M.
Oliveira
a,
Clovis
R.
Nakaie
a,
Regiane
A.
Sabatini
b,
Vanessa
F.
Merino
c,
João
B.
Pesquero
a,
Michael
Bader
a,
Suma
I.
Shimuta
a,∗aDepartmentofBiophysics,FederalUniversityofSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo04023-062,Brazil
bDepartmentofNephrology,FederalUniversityofSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo04023-062,Brazil
cOncology,JohnsHopkinsUniversitySchoolofMedicine,Baltimore,USA
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received3May2011 Receivedinrevisedform 28December2012 Accepted2January2013 Availableonline8January2013
Keywords:
AngiotensinII Bradykinin des-Arg9-bradykinin Kininreceptors ACE
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Bradykinin(BK)anddes-Arg9-bradykinin(DBK)ofkallikrein-kininsystemexertitseffectsmediatedby
theB2(B2R)andB1(B1R)receptors,respectively.ItwasalreadyshownthatthedeletionofkininB1R
orofB2Rinducesupregulationoftheremainingreceptorsubtype[10,12,16,28,36].Howeverstudieson
overexpressionofB1RorB2Rintransgenicanimalshavesupportedtheimportanceoftheoverexpressed
receptorbuttheexpressionofanotherreceptorsubtypehasnotbeendetermined[17,19,33].Previous
studydescribedamarkedvasodilatationandincreasedsusceptibilitytoendotoxicshockwhichwas
asso-ciatedwithincreasedmortalityinresponsetoDBKinthoracicaortafromtransgenicratoverexpressing
thekininB1R(TGR(Tie2B1))exclusivelyintheendothelium.Inanotherstudy,miceoverexpressingB1Rin
multipletissueswereshowntopresenthighsusceptibilitytoinflammationandto
lipopolysaccharide-inducedendotoxicshock.ThereforetheroleofB2Rwasinvestigatedinthethoracicaortaisolatedfrom
TGR(Tie2B1)ratsoverexpressingtheB1Rexclusivelyinthevascularendothelium.Ourfindingsprovided
evidenceforhighlyincreasedexpressionleveloftheB2Rinthetransgenicrats.Itwasreportedthatunder
endotoxicshock,theseratsexhibitedexaggeratedhypotension,bradycardiaandmortality.Itcanbe
sug-gestedthatthehighmortalityduringthepathogenesisofendotoxicshockprovokedinthetransgenic
TGR(Tie2B1)ratscouldbeduetotheenhancedexpressionofB2Rassociatedwiththeoverexpressionof
theB1R.
©2013ElsevierInc.
1. Introduction
Kininsarepotentinflammatorymediatorsandinduce contrac-tionandrelaxationinseveralvascularandnon-vascularsmooth muscles[4,24].Thekininsbelongtothekallikrein-kininsystem (KKS)involvedintherenalandcardiovascularregulation[4,13]. Bradykinin(BK:Arg1-Pro2-Pro3-Gly4-Phe5-Ser6-Pro7-Phe8-Arg9), isanonapeptidehormonewhichmediatestheactionofthe con-stitutivelyexpressedkininB2 receptor(B2R).Ontheotherhand, thekininB1receptor(B1R)isaninducedreceptoranditseffectis mediatedbydes-Arg9-BK(DBK),a1–8fragmentofBK[25].The expressionlevel of B1Ris verylow inhealthy tissues but high in inflammatory conditions or aftertime-dependent incubation
[13,15,25].
Geneticallyengineeredanimalshavebeeninbredtoallowa bet-terunderstandingofthefunctionofkininsandtherole ofeach subtypeofreceptors.Thereforeseveraltransgenicanimalshave
∗Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+551155724583;fax:+551155715780.
E-mailaddresses:sshimuta@unifesp.br,sshimuta@gmail.com(S.I.Shimuta).
beencreated,suchasmicedeficientinthekininB1R[21,28],in thekininB2R[5,9,10,12]andalsoinbothkininB1RandB2R[8],as wellasmiceoverexpressingtheB1R[17,19]ortheB2R[34].Ithas beenshownthatthelackofkininreceptorsmayaffectthe reactiv-ityofthevascularsmoothmusclepreparationsorcausechanges intheexpressionlevelofsomereceptorsofkallikreinkininsystem (KKS)andreninangiotensinsystem(RAS)inthesametissue[26].
Across-talkbetweentheRASandKKSisbasedontheeffect ofangiotensinI(AngI)convertingenzyme(ACE),whichis respon-sible for the cleavage of AngI into the potent vasoconstrictor angiotensinII(AngII)andofthevasodilatorBKintonon-active pep-tidefragments[4,6,37].TheACEenzymeis mostlyexpressedin theendothelialvascularsmoothmuscle,mainlyinthepulmonary arteries[4].
Severalstudieshavedemonstratedinteractionsbetweenkinin receptors and AngII type 1 receptor (AT1R). Therefore it was reportedthatspontaneousinteractionofB1RandB2Rincreasesthe abilityofB1RbutnotofB2Rtobestimulatedbyitsagonist[11]; het-erodimerizationbetweenB2RandAT1Rcausesincreasedactivation ofGproteinsignalingtriggeredbyAT1RbutnotbyB2R[1];AngII mayregulatetheexpressionofB2RmRNA[32],thatB2Rgeneisa
0196-9781©2013ElsevierInc.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2013.01.002
Open access under the Elsevier OA license.
andKKSand theevidence forexpressionofAngII AT1Rprotein andmRNAinendothelialcells[18,22,23,31,35]providerationale forstudyingtheinteractionsbetweenAngIIandBKreceptorsin additiontotheassessmentaboutvascularreactivityofthekinin aswellastheexpressionlevelofB2Rintheaortaisolatedfrom transgenic(TGR(Tie2B1))rats.
2. Materialandmethods
2.1. Animals
Experimentswerecarriedoutusing300–350gSprague-Dawley ratsascontrol(WT)andoverexpressingB1R(TGR(Tie2B1)),[17] fromthe“CentrodeDesenvolvimentodeModelosExperimentais” (CEDEME)oftheUniversidadeFederaldeSãoPaulo(UNIFESP).The animalsweremaintainedonstandard ratchowat21–23◦C and
kepton12hlight:12hdarkcycleandallowedadlibitumaccess tofoodandwater.Theprotocolsusedinthisstudywerein accor-dancewithcurrentguidelinesforthecareoflaboratoryanimals andethicalguidelinesforinvestigationsapprovedbytheAnimal CareCommitteeofUNIFESP.
2.2. Isometricrelaxationandcontractionrecordings
Thoracicaortawere isolatedfrom rat, clearedof connective tissueand mounted asringpreparations into5ml organbaths. The ringsof aortawere bathed in carboxygenated (95% O2/5% CO2), and modified Krebs-Ringer solution: 144mM NaCl, 5mM KCl,1.1mMMgSO4,25mMNaHCO3,1.1mMNaH2PO4,1.25mM CaCland5.5mMglucoseat37◦C (pH7.4).Resting tensionwas
maintainedat 0.5gand thetissues wereleft to equilibrate for 90min,withfrequentchangingofbathingsolution.Thetissue via-bilitywasassessedwithaprimingdoseof80mMKCland1M norepinephrine(NE),asdescribedpreviouslyby[30].Followinga 90minwashoutandrecoveryperiod,changesintensionproduced bythestimulantsweremeasuredwithanisometrictransducer TRI201(Panlabs.l.,Cornella,Barcelona,Spain)throughan ampli-fierPowerlab4/30andsoftwareLabchartProV7(ADInstruments, ColoradoSprings,CO,USA).
Cumulative concentration–response curves were
con-structed for BK applying increasing concentrations (0.1nM to 1M) of the agonist. On the other hand non-cumulative concentration–responsecurveswereobtainedfor AngIandAng IIto avoid desensitization, as described previously by [3]. The presenceoftheendotheliuminthethoracicaortawasconfirmed pharmacologically by the acetylcholine-induced relaxing effect onaorticringspre-contractedwithNE1M.Somecurveswere obtainedinthepresenceandabsenceoflisinopril(1M),anACE inhibitor,pre-incubatedfor20minandinthepresenceofR-715, specificantagonistofB1R,sincethetissuewasisolatedfromthe animal.TheeffectofspecificblockersofB2R,HOE-140(1M),the nitricoxidesynthaseinhibitor,L-NAME(1mM)andthe cyclooxy-genaseinhibitor,indomethacin(1M)pre-incubatedfor20min weretestedonthemaximalresponseinducedbyBK.Curve-fitting analyses(GraphPad-Prismsoftware, SanDiego, California, USA) wereusedtodeterminetheapparentaffinityofagonistsinterms ofpD2,which isthenegativelogarithm oftheconcentrationof agonistthatproduces50%ofthemaximaleffect)andthemaximal effect(Emax)wascalculatedinrelationtotheeffectinducedby 1MNE,whichwasconsidered100%.
isolatedusingTRIzol®reagent(Invitrogen,Carlsbad,CA,USA).After purification,thepresenceofintactRNAwasverifiedonan ethid-iumbromide-stainedagarosegel.ThetotalRNAwassubmittedto reversetranscriptioninthepresenceof2.5ng/Lofrandom hex-anucleotidesand2.5Mofoligo(dT)20,200MofdNTP,10mMof MgCl2 and2unitsofSuperScriptTMIIIFirst-Strandreverse trans-criptase(Invitrogen,Carlsbad,CA,USA).
TodeterminetheexpressionlevelsofkininB2andAT1 recep-tors,andACE,real-timePCRwasperformedusing5lofsamples containing1:10dilutedcDNA.Eachreactionwascarriedoutwith 10LofTaqManUniversalPCRMasterMix2×(Applied Biosys-tems,FosterCity,CA,USA),1Lofeachpairofspecificprimersand aprobelinkedwithaTAMRAdyeandaFAMquencher.Theused primers were for B2R (reverse primer 5′ -CACCACGCGGCACAG-3′, forward primer 5′-ATCACCATCGCCAATAACTTCGA-3′ and
probe 5′-6FAM-CACCTCTCCGAACAGC-TAMRA-3′), for ACE
(reverse primer 5′-CCTGCTGTGGTTCCAGGTACA-3′, forward
primer 5′-AACACGGCTCGTGCAGAAG-3′ and probe, 5′
-6FAM-CCTCCCAGAGTCCAGTCGCGTCA-TAMRA-3′) and for AT
1 receptor (reverse primer 5′-CAGTGTCCACGATGTCAGAAATTTT-3′,
for-ward primer 5′-ACTTTCCTGGATGTGCTGATTCAG-3′ and probe
5′-6FAM-CTGGGCGTCATCCAT-TAMRA-3′)andbeta-actin
endoge-nouscontrol (reverseprimer 5′-GCCTGGATGGCTACGTACATG-3′,
forward primer 5′-GGCCAACCGTGAAAAGATGAC-3′ and probe
5′-6FAM-CAGATCATGTTTGAGACCTT-TAMRA-3′)andMili-Qwater
(MiliporeCorporation)to20L.
Thereal-timePCRswereperformedwithanABIPRISM®7000 sequencedetectionsystem(Applied)andcycleconditionswere: 50◦Cfor2min,95◦Cfor10min,followedby50cyclesof95◦Cfor
15s(meltingstep),60◦Cfor1min(anneal/extendstep).Increases
intheamountofreporterdyefluorescenceduringthe50 ampli-ficationcyclesweremonitoredusingSequenceDetectorsoftware (SDSversion1.6,AppliedBiosystems).Quantificationofthetarget amountwasperformedbymeasuringthethresholdcycle,CT,which isdefinedasthefractionalcyclenumberatwhichthefluorescence encountersafixedthreshold.Anormalizedvaluetoevaluatethe mRNAexpressionwascalculatedasthedifferenceinthethreshold cycle:theCTvaluesofreceptorminusCTofinternalstandard( -actin),resultinginCT.SinceitisuncommontouseCTparameter asarelativeexpressionparameterduetothislogarithmic char-acteristic,the2−CT parameterwasusedtoexpresstherelative
geneexpressiondata[14].Finaldataareexpressedastheratioof thefold-changeinthetargetgeneinthetransgenicratoverthe fold-changeinthetargetgeneofcontrolrat.
2.4. ACEactivity
Thoracicaortaisolatedfromratwerequicklyharvested,rinsed, blotted,frozedandhomogenizedinTris–HClbuffer,pH7.0, con-taining50mMNaClandTween20,0.2%.Subsequently,thesamples werecentrifugedat1000g for10minand thesupernatant was frozenat−20◦C.Theproteincontentsofthesampleswere
mea-suredbythemethodofBradfordusingbovineserumalbuminas standard.TheACEactivitywasdeterminedusing Abz-FRK(Dnp)P-OH (Abz=ortho-amino benzoic acid; Dnp=ethylenediamine) as substratesfollowing themethodology previously described [7]. Theincreaseinthefluorescencewascontinuouslymeasuredina HitachiF-7000fluorimetersetatem=420nmandex=320nm andtheassayscarriedoutin96-wellplates(finalvolumeineach well=0.2mL).TheevaluationofthoracicaortaACEactivitywas per-formedat37◦Cin0.1MTris–HClbuffer,pH7.0,containing0.05M
Fig.1. EffectoftheoverexpressionofB1receptorsontherelaxationinducedbyBK inrataorta.Cumulativeconcentration–responsecurvesforbradykinin(BK)were determinedinthoracicaorticringsisolatedfromWTandtransgenicrat overex-pressingtheB1receptorspecificallyinthevascularendothelium(TGR(Tie2B1)).The isometricrelaxingresponseswerecalculatedinrelationtotheincreasedtonusofthe aortainducedby1Mnorepinephrine(NE),considered100%.Dataareexpressed asmeans±SDof5experiments.*SignificantlydifferentfromcontrolWTanimals (P<0.05).
wewant tosuppress(10ME64,1Mpepstatin,1mM PMSF, 100MTLCK,and100MTPCK).Beforestartingthereactionbythe additionof10MofAbz-FRK(Dnp)P-OH,thetissueshomogenates werepreincubatedfor5minintheassaybuffer,at37◦C.Todefine
thespecificityforACE,theassayswerealsoperformedinthe pres-enceofthecocktailofinhibitorsplus1Mofthelisinopril.The slope wasconverted into nMof substrate hydrolyzed/min.The measurementswereperformed intriplicateand theresultsare expressedasmeans±SD.
2.5. Drugsandprimers
BK,AngI,AngII,lisinopril,L-NAME,indomethacinandHOE-140 werepurchasedfromSigmaChemicalCo.(Dorset,U.K).R-715was agiftfromD.Regoli,UniversitédeSherbrooke,Quebec,Canada.
Concentratedsolutionsofpeptidesandotheragentswere pre-pared in water and kept at 20◦C until they were used. The
stocksolutionswereseriallydilutedwithKrebs–Ringersolution. OligonucleotideprimerandfluorogenicprobesetsforTaqmanTM Real-TimePCRweredesignedforkininreceptorsandbeta-actin usingAssays-by-DesignService(AppliedBiosystems).
2.6. Statisticalanalysis
Valuesareexpressedasmeans±SDand(n).TheStudentt-test wasusedtodeterminethestatisticaldifferences,withthelevelof significancesetasP<0.05.
3. Results
3.1. EffectofkininBKontheaorticringsisolatedfromwildtype andtransgenicratsoverexpressingtheB1R
RecordingsoftherelaxanteffectinducedbyBKwereobtainedby cumulativeincreasingconcentrationsoftheagonistintothoracic aorticpreparationsisolatedfromWTandratoverexpressingthe B1Rspecificallyintheendothelium,TGR(Tie2B1).Non-cumulative concentration–response curves induced by BK were not differ-entfromthecumulative concentrationcurves.Fig.1showsthe concentration-dependentrelaxationtoBKintheaorticrings iso-latedfromWTandTGR(Tie2B1)rats.Themaximalresponses(%) were21±2(4)forWTand50±5(5)forTGR(Tie2B1)rats.ThepD2 (-logEC50,concentrationoftheagonistthatinduces50%ofthe max-imalresponse)valueswere8.0±0.3(4)forWTand8.1±0.3(5)for TGR(Tie2B1).
Fig.2.EffectofspecifickininB1receptorantagonist,R-715,ontherelaxantresponse inducedbybradykinin(BK)inratthoracicaorta.EffectofR-715(1M)onBK inducedresponseinaortaisolatedfrom(A)WTand(B)transgenicratwith endothe-lialoverexpressionofkininB1receptor(TGR(Tie2B1)).Theresponseswerecalculated inrelationtotheeffectinducedby1Mnorepinephrine(NE),whichwasconsidered 100%.Dataaremeans±SDof3experiments.
3.2. Effectofkininreceptorantagonistsontherelaxantresponses inducedbyBKinthoracicaortaisolatedfromTGR(Tie2B1)rats
Toevaluatewhethertheenhancedrelaxantresponsesinduced byBKwerepartlyduetotheactivationofB1R,theringsofthoracic aortaisolatedfromFig.2A,WTandFig.2B,ratoverexpressingthe B1Rspecificallyinthevascularendothelium(TGR(Tie2B1))were preincubatedwith1MofR-715,specificinhibitorofB1R.Ascan beseeninFig.2,concentration–responsecurvesforBKintherat thoracicaortaweresimilarbetweenWTandTGR(Tie2B1).ThepD2 valuesforBKinthepresenceofantagonistwere7.8±0.1(3)forWT and7.8±0.2(3)forTGR(Tie2B1), whereasinpreparations with-outthepresenceoftheantagonistwere8.0±0.3(4)forWTand 8.1±0.3(5)forTGR(Tie2B1).Themaximalresponse(%)toBKin thepresenceof1MR-715was21±1(3)forWTand50±3(3)for TGR(Tie2B1)andinnon-treatedpreparationsthevalueswere21±2 (4)forWTand50±5(5)forTGR(Tie2B1).Ontheotherhandwhen 1MHOE-140waspre-incubated,BK(100nM)inducedresponse
Fig.4. EffectofL-NAMEandindomethacinonbradykinininducedresponseinrat aorta.Relaxantresponsesinducedbybradykinin(BK,1M)inthepresenceorin theabsenceof1ML-NAMEor1Mindomethacin,pre-incubatedfor20minin ringsofthoracicaortaisolatedfromWTratandtransgenicratoverexpressingthe B1receptorexclusivelyintheendothelium(TGR(Tie2B1)).Therelaxantresponses werecalculatedinrelationtotheeffectinducedby1Mnorepinephrine(NE).The datashownarethemean±S.D.of3experiments.*Significantlydifferent(P<0.05) fromthecontrol(withoutinhibitors)and#differentfromWT.
wastotallyinhibitedinrataortaisolatedfromWTandTGR(Tie2B1) asshowninFig.3.
3.3. EffectofL-NAMEandindomethacinonthe bradykinin-inducedrelaxation
Toverify iftheBK-inducedrelaxation wasmediated byNO, theinhibitor ofNOsynthaseactivitywastested.Pre-incubation with1mML-NAMEfor20mincompletelyblockedthemaximal relaxationinducedbyBKinthoracicringswithendothelium-intact isolatedfromWTratandTGR(Tie2B1).Ontheotherhand,asshown inFig.4,theresponsesinducedbyBKinbothpreparationswere not blocked by pre-incubation for 20min withcyclooxygenase inhibitorindomethacin(1M).
3.4. PharmacologicaldeterminationofACEactivityinthoracic ringsaortaisolatedfromtransgenicratsoverexpressingtheB1R
ThefindingthatthereactivitytoBKwasenhancedinthe trans-genickininB1Rknockoutmice[20]andthatACEactivitycanbe influencedbyB2RandB1R[2,27],ledustotesttheresponsiveness ofthethoracicaortatoAngIandtoBKinthepresenceoflisinoprilto evaluateapossiblechangeintheACEactivityinTGR(Tie2B1)rats.
Therole of ACEwastested ontherelaxingresponsestoBK usinglisinopril(1M)pre-incubatedfor30min.Underthis con-dition,thecurvesconcentration–responsestoBKwereobtainedin thethoracicaortaofWTandTGR(Tie2B1)rats.Fig.5showsthat thesigmoidaldoseresponsecurvesweresimilarinboth prepara-tions(WT,Fig.5AandTGR(Tie2B1),Fig.5B),incomparisontothose obtainedintheabsenceoftheinhibitor,indicatingnosignificant differenceinthesensitivityofBKtoACEactivityintheTGR(Tie2B1) rats.Moreover,todeterminetheactivityofACEinTGR(Tie2B1) rats, onthe conversion of AngI to AngII, contractile responses induced by AngI pre-incubated for 30minwith lisinopril were tested.Concentration–responsecurveswereobtainedincubating non-cumulativeconcentrationsofAngItoavoiddesensitization.In thepresenceofACEinhibitortherewassimilarinhibitionofthe responsesthroughoutalltestedconcentrationsoftheagonistin bothstrainsoftherats(WT,5CandTGR(Tie2B1),5D).ThepD2 val-uesexpressingthepotencyandthemaximalresponse(Emax)values arepresentedinTable1.
3.5. DeterminationofACEactivitywithAbz-FRK(Dnp)P-OH hydrolysis
TheACEactivitywasalsodeterminedusingaselective fluores-cencesubstrateassayforACEwithAbz-FRK(Dnp)P-OHassubstrate.
Fig.5. PharmacologicaldeterminationofACEactivityinthoracicaorta. Cumu-lative concentration–relaxant responsecurves for bradykinin(BK)in thoracic aorta isolated from (A), WT and (B), from transgenic rat overexpressing theB1 receptorspecificallyintheendothelium(TGR(Tie2B1)).Non-cumulative concentration–contractileresponsecurvesforangiotensinI(AngI)in(C),WTand in(D),TGR(Tie2B1)rats.Thecurvesweredeterminedinthepresenceorabsence ofACEinhibitorlisinopril(1M),pre-incubatedfor20min.Theisometricrelaxant responsestoBKandcontractileresponsestoAngIareexpressedaspercentageof theeffectof1Mnorepinephrine(NE),considered100%.Dataaremeans±SDof3 experiments.*SignificantlydifferentfromthecontrolWTanimals(P<0.05).
Table1
EffectoflisinoprilontheapparentaffinityandmaximalresponsesinducedbyBKandAngIinratthoracicaorta.
BK BK+lisinopril AngI AngI+lisinopril
pD2 Emax pD2 Emax pD2 Emax pD2 Emax
WT 8.0±0.3(4) 21±2(4) 8.6±0.2(3) 45±3(3)* 7.9
±0.3(4) 41±8(4) 7.8±0.2(3) 13±0.8(3)*
TGR(Tie2B1) 8.1±0.3(5) 50±5(5)# 8.7
±0.4(3) 58±5(3)* 8.0
±0.3(4) 41±3(4) 7.8±0.3(3) 14±1(3)*
BKinducedrelaxantresponsesandcontractileresponsesinducedbyAngIinthepresenceorintheabsenceofACEinhibitorlisinopril(1M)inthoracicaortaisolatedfrom WTratandtransgenicratoverexpressingtheB1receptorspecificallyintheendothelium(TGR(Tie2B1)).ThepD2values(negativelogarithmoftheagonistconcentration(M) thatinduces50%ofthemaximalresponse)wereextractedfromtheconcentration–responsesigmoidlogisticcurves.Themaximalresponse(Emax)wascalculatedinrelation to1Mofnorepinephrine,whichwasconsidered100%.Dataaremeans±S.D.and(n)numberofexperiments.
*Different(P<0.05)fromBKorAngI(withoutinhibitor).
#DifferentfromWT.
Fig.6.FluorescenceassayofACEactivity.ACEactivityassaywasperformedusing aselectivefluorescentsubstrateforACE,Abz-FRK(Dnp)P-OH(ortho-aminobenzoic acid-FRK-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)P-OH)inthethoracicaortaisolatedfromWTratand transgenicratoverexpressingtheB1receptorspecificallyinthevascular endothe-lium(TGR)Tie2B1)).Dataaremeans±SDof3experiments.
Fig.7.RelativegeneexpressionofkininB2receptor,ACEandangiotensinIItypeI receptor.TheexpressionlevelsofB2receptor,ACEandangiotensinIItype1(AT1 receptor)weredeterminedinthoracicaortaisolatedfromwild-type(WT)ratand fromendothelialoverexpressedkininB1receptor(TGR(Tie2B1)).ThevaluesofmRNA expressionlevelswerequantifiedbyreal-timePCR.Thevaluesoftherelativegene expressionwerecalculatedas2−CTparameter,whichisobtainedbysubtracting
theCT(thresholdcycle)ofgenetargetfromtheCTofinternalstandard.Finaldata areexpressedastheratiooffoldchangeofcDNAinthetransgenicrat(TGR(Tie2B1)) targetgeneversusthefoldchangeofcDNAincontrol.Thedataaremeans±S.D.of 3–5experiments.*Significantlydifferentfromthecontrolvalue(P<0.05).
3.6. ExpressionlevelofkininB2receptorsandofACE
TheexpressionlevelsofB2RweredeterminedbyrealtimePCR relativequantification,sincethemaximumeffectinducedbyBK inthetransgenicTGR(Tie2B1)ratswashigherthanintheWTrats. Furthermore,expressionlevelofACEwasevaluated.Fig.7shows theresultsaboutthelevelsoftheirexpression,which was cal-culatedbyfold-upchangeofthetransgenicratoverthecontrol group.TheexpressionlevelofB2Rincreasedaboutthreefoldsin theTGR(Tie2B1)ratwhereasthatofACEmRNAexpressionwasnot significantlydifferentfromthecontrolWTrats.
3.7. VascularreactivitytoangiotensinIIandexpressionlevelof AT1receptorinaortaisolatedfromTGR(Tie2B1)rat
Responsivenessof thethoracic aortic ringsto angiotensinII (AngII) induced contractile response was assessed to evaluate
Fig.8. EffectofendothelialoverexpressionofkininB1receptorsonthecontraction inducedbyAngIIinrataorta.Non-cumulativeconcentration–responsecurvesfor angiotensinII(AngII)weredeterminedinthethoracicaortaisolatedfromWTrat andtransgenicratoverexpressingtheB1receptorspecificallyintheendothelium (TGR(Tie2B1)).Theisometriccontractileresponsesareexpressedaspercentageof theeffectof1Mnorepinephrine(NE),considered100%.Dataaremeans±SDof5 experiments.*SignificantlydifferentfromthecontrolWTanimals(P<0.05).
any cross-talking betweenkinin and AT1 receptors under con-ditions where the expression level of B2R was shown to be increasedinTGR(Tie2B1)rat.Theconcentration-responsescurves wereobtainedusingnon-cumulativemannerforstimulationsto avoiddesensitization.Thedatashowthatthevascularreactivity toAngII(Fig.8)intheaorticringsfromTGR(Tie2B1)ratswasnot alteredwhencomparedtothatofWTrat.Themaximalresponse values(%)were31±4(4)forWTand30±2(5)forTGR(Tie2B1) andthepD2valueswere7.8±0.2(4)forWTand7.9±0.2(5)for TGR(Tie2B1).Inaddition,thedeterminationofAT1receptormRNA expressionrevealed thatin aortaoverexpressingtheB1 and B2 receptors,therewasnosignificantdifferencefromthecontrolWT rats(Fig.7).
4. Discussionandconclusion
pawand edema induced by carrageenan and high susceptibil-ity toendotoxicshock induced by lipopolysaccharide[19]. The presentstudy showedthat B2Rwassurprisingly overexpressed intheendotheliumofthoracic aortafromTGR(Tie2B1)rat.This findingwasunexpectedsinceadownregulationshouldoccuras acounterregulatorymechanismforoverexpressionofB1R.Ithas beenreportedthatthelackofonekininreceptoriscompensated bytheup-regulationoftheothersubtype,asshowninthecaseof deletionofB2R[10,12,36]andofB1R[16,28].
In another study [28], lipopolysaccharide treatment caused enhancedB2RmRNAwhichwasfurtherincreasedinB1KOmice with increased mortality. Although some studies have been reportedaboutoverexpressionofB1R[17,19]orB2R[33]assessing theimportanceoftheoverexpressedreceptor,theexpressionof theotherremainingreceptorsubtypehasnotbeendetermined.
TheenhancedB2RmRNAexpressioninTGR(Tie2B1)ratwas cor-relatedwiththeincreasedresponsivenessofrataortatoitsagonist BK.ThefindingthattheabilityofACEtoconvertAngItoAngIIwas notreducedneithertheACEmRNAwasaltered,providedevidence thattheincreaseintheBKreactivitywasnotmodulatedbyACE activityduetothehighexpressionoftheB2R.Thisconclusioncould notconfirmaneffectofACE/kininB2RinteractionmodulatingACE activityaspreviouslydescribed[20,27].
Itisnoteworthythatwasfoundnoevidenceforincreased activa-tionofAT1RsincethevascularreactivitytoAngIIwasmaintainedin theaortaisolatedfrom(TGR(Tie2B1))rats.Thereforethehypothesis thataspontaneousheterodimerizationofAngIIandBKreceptors couldtriggertheAT1Ractivationwasnotconfirmedincontrastto thatpreviouslyreported[1].
Inconclusion,transgenicratsoverexpressingkininB1R exclu-sively in the endothelium of TGR(Tie2B1) rats were shown to overexpressthekininB2Randtocauseincreasedresponsiveness toBK. It was reported that after lipopolysaccharidetreatment, thesetransgenicratspresentedamorepronouncedhypotensive responseandmarkedbradycardiaassociatedwithincreased mor-talitywhencomparedtonon-transgeniccontrolrats[17].Itwas alreadyreportedthatB1RandB2Rwereupregulatedbyendotoxins andthatB2RmRNAwasfurtherincreasedinB1KOduringtheacute phaseofendotoxinshockinvolvingincreasedmortality[28]. There-forethemechanismbywhichB2RmRNAexpressionisincreased inratsoverexpressingkininB1Rneedsfurtherinvestigation.Our findingsupportsanimportantroleofB1andB2receptorsduring thepathogenesisofendotoxicshock.Fromthisstudyitcanbe sug-gestedthatoverexpressionandincreasedactivationofkininB2R couldbeinvolvedinthehighmortalityduringthepathogenesisof endotoxicshock,whereinB1Rexpressionishighlyinduced.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants from São Paulo State ResearchFoundation(FAPESP):FAPESPN◦2009/08336-2;FAPESP
N◦2010/05255-9)andbytheBrazilianNationalResearchCouncil
(CNPqN◦300247/2010-9).
References
[1] AbdAllaS,LotherH,QuittererU.AT1-receptorheterodimersshowenhanced G-proteinactivationandalteredreceptorsequestration.Nature2000;407:94–8. [2] AlvesMF,AraujoMC,JulianoMA,OliveiraEM,KriegerJE,CasariniDE,etal. Acontinuousfluorescentassayforthedeterminationofplasmaandtissue angiotensinI-convertingenzymeactivity.BrazJMedBiolRes2005;38:861–8.
[5]BorkowskiJA,HessJF.TargeteddisruptionofthemouseB2bradykininreceptor inembryonicstemcells.CanJPhysiolPharmacol1995;73:773–9.
[6] CampbellDJ.Towardsunderstandingthekallikrein-kininsystem:insightsfrom measurementofkininpeptides.BrazJMedBiolRes2000;33:665–77. [7] CarmonaAK,SchwagerSL,JulianoMA,JulianoL,SturrockED.Acontinuous
fluorescenceresonanceenergytransferangiotensinI-convertingenzymeassay. NatProtoc2006;1:1971–6.
[8]CaylaC,TodirasM,IliescuR,SaulVV,GrossV,PilzB,etal.Micedeficientfor bothkininreceptorsarenormotensiveandprotectedfromendotoxin-induced hypotension.FasebJ2007;21:1689–98.
[9] DukaI,DukaA,KintsurashviliE,JohnsC,GavrasI,GavrasH.Mechanisms medi-atingthevasoactiveeffectsoftheB1receptorsofbradykinin.Hypertension 2003;42:1021–5.
[10]DukaI,KintsurashviliE,GavrasI,JohnsC,BresnahanM,GavrasH.Vasoactive potentialoftheb(1)bradykininreceptorinnormotensionandhypertension. CircRes2001;88:275–81.
[11]KangDS,RybergK,MorgelinM,Leeb-LundbergLM.Spontaneousformationof aproteolyticB1andB2bradykininreceptorcomplexwithenhancedsignaling capacity.JBiolChem2004;279:22102–7.
[12]KintsurashviliE,DukaI,GavrasI,JohnsC,FarmakiotisD,GavrasH.Effects ofANGIIonbradykininreceptorgeneexpressionincardiomyocytesand vascular smoothmusclecells.AmJPhysiolHeartCircPhysiol2001;281: H1778–83.
[13]Leeb-Lundberg LM,MarceauF, Muller-EsterlW,Pettibone DJ,Zuraw BL. Internationalunionofpharmacology.XLV.Classificationofthekinin recep-torfamily:frommolecularmechanismstopathophysiologicalconsequences. PharmacolRev2005;57:27–77.
[14]Livak KJ,Schmittgen TD.Analysis ofrelativegeneexpressiondatausing real-timequantitativePCRandthe2(-DeltaDeltaC(T))Method.Methods 2001;25:402–8.
[15] MarceauF,HessJF,BachvarovDR.TheB1receptorsforkinins.PharmacolRev 1998;50:357–86.
[16]MarconR,ClaudinoRF,DutraRC,BentoAF,SchmidtEC,BouzonZL,etal. ExacerbationofDSS-inducedcolitisinmicelackingkininB1receptorthrough compensationofup-regulationofkininB2receptors:theroleoftightjunctions andintestinalhomeostasis.BrJPharmacol2013;168:389–402.
[17]MerinoVF,TodirasM,CamposLA,SaulV,PopovaE,BaltatuOC,etal.Increased susceptibilitytoendotoxicshockintransgenicratswithendothelial overex-pressionofkininB(1)receptors.JMolMed(Berl)2008;86:791–8.
[18] NakashimaH,SuzukiH,OhtsuH,ChaoJY,UtsunomiyaH,FrankGD,etal. AngiotensinIIregulatesvascularandendothelialdysfunction:recenttopicsof AngiotensinIItype-1receptorsignalinginthevasculature.CurrVascPharmacol 2006;4:67–78.
[19] NiA,YinH,AgataJ,YangZ,ChaoL,ChaoJ.OverexpressionofkininB1receptors induceshypertensiveresponsetodes-Arg9-bradykininandsusceptibilityto inflammation.JBiolChem2003;278:219–25.
[20] OliveiraCR, Paredes-GameroEJ, Barbosa CM,Nascimento FD,BatistaEC, ReisFC,etal.MyelopoiesismodulationbyACEhyperfunctioninkininB(1) receptorknockoutmice:relationshipwithAcSDKPlevels.ChemBiolInteract 2010;184:388–95.
[21]PesqueroJB,AraujoRC,HeppenstallPA,StuckyCL,SilvaJrJA,WaltherT,etal. HypoalgesiaandalteredinflammatoryresponsesinmicelackingkininB1 receptors.ProcNatlAcadSciUSA2000;97:8140–5.
[22]PueyoME,ArnalJF,RamiJ,MichelJB.AngiotensinIIstimulatestheproduction ofNOandperoxynitriteinendothelialcells.AmJPhysiol1998;274:C214–20. [23]PueyoME,MichelJB.AngiotensinIIreceptorsinendothelialcells.Gen
Pharma-col1997;29:691–6.
[24]RegoliD,BarabeJ.Pharmacologyofbradykininandrelatedkinins.Pharmacol Rev1980;32:1–46.
[25]RegoliD,BarabeJ,ParkWK.Receptorsforbradykinininrabbitaortae.CanJ PhysiolPharmacol1977;55:855–67.
[26]RodriguesES,MartinRP,FelipeSA,BaderM,OliveiraSM,ShimutaSI.Cross talkbetweenkininandangiotensinIIreceptorsinmouseabdominalaorta: molecularandfunctionalaspects.BiolChem2009;390:907–13.
[27]SabatiniRA,GuimaraesPB,FernandesL,ReisFC,BersanettiPA,MoriMA, etal.ACEactivityismodulatedbykininB2receptor.Hypertension2008;51: 689–95.
[28]SeguinT,BuleonM,DestrubeM,RaneraMT,CoutureR,GirolamiJP,etal. Hemo-dynamicandrenalinvolvementofB1andB2kininreceptorsduringtheacute phaseofendotoxinshockinmice.IntImmunopharmacol2008;8:217–21. [29]ShenB,Harrison-BernardLM,FullerAJ,VanderpoolV,SaifudeenZ,El-DahrSS.
TheBradykininB2receptorgeneisatargetofangiotensinIItype1receptor signaling.JAmSocNephrol2007;18:1140–9.
[30]ShimutaSI,BarbosaAM,BorgesAC,PaivaTB.Pharmacologicalcharacterization ofRMP-7,anovelbradykininagonistinsmoothmuscle.Immunopharmacology 1999;45:63–7.
[31]Siddiqui AH,Hussain T. EnhancedAT1receptor-mediated vasocontractile responsetoANGIIinendothelium-denudedaortaofobeseZuckerrats.Am JPhysiolHeartCircPhysiol2007;292:H1722–7.
[33]Wang D, Yoshida H, Song Q, Chao L, Chao J. Enhanced renal function in bradykininB(2) receptortransgenicmice.Am JPhysiol RenalPhysiol 2000;278:F484–91.
[34]WangDZ,ChaoL,ChaoJ.Hypotensionintransgenicmiceoverexpressing humanbradykininB2receptor.Hypertension1997;29:488–93.
[35]WilliamsB,BakerAQ,GallacherB,LodwickD,AngiotensinII.increasesvascular permeabilityfactorgeneexpressionbyhumanvascularsmoothmusclecells. Hypertension1995;25:913–7.
[36]XuJ,CarreteroOA,ZhuL,SheselyEG,RhalebNE,DaiX,etal.Theprotectiverole ofAT2andB1receptorsinKininB2receptorknockoutmicewithmyocardial infarction.ClinSci(Lond)2013;124:87–96.