• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Correction: In Vivo Robustness Analysis of Cell Division Cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "Correction: In Vivo Robustness Analysis of Cell Division Cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae."

Copied!
1
0
0

Texto

(1)

Correction: Comparative Genomics of Emerging Human Ehrlichiosis Agents

Julie C. Dunning Hotopp, Mingqun Lin, Ramana Madupu, Jonathan Crabtree, Samuel V. Angiuoli, Jonathan A. Eisen,

Rekha Seshadri, Qinghu Ren, Martin Wu, Teresa R. Utterback, Shannon Smith, Matthew Lewis, Hoda Khouri, Chunbin Zhang, Hua Niu, Quan Lin, Norio Ohashi, Ning Zhi, William Nelson, Lauren M. Brinkac, Robert J. Dodson, M. J. Rosovitz,

Jaideep Sundaram, Sean C. Daugherty, Tanja Davidsen, Anthony S. Durkin, Michelle Gwinn, Daniel H. Haft, Jeremy D. Selengut, Steven A. Sullivan, Nikhat Zafar, Liwei Zhou, Faiza Benahmed, Heather Forberger, Rebecca Halpin, Stephanie Mulligan, Jeffrey Robinson, Owen White, Yasuko Rikihisa, Herve´ Tettelin

doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020021

InPLoS Genetics,volume 2, issue 2:

The original research article mistakenly listed Jonathan A. Eisen without his middle initial.

The original copyright did not indicate that the article is part of the public domain; the correct copyright statement is:

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.

Additionally, in the Accession Numbers section, theNeorickettsia sennetsuaccession number is CP000237 instead of the published CP00237.

This correction note may be found online at doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020213 Published December 29, 2006

Citation: (2006) Correction: Comparative genomics of emerging human ehrlichiosis agents. PLoS Genet 2(12): e213. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020213

Correction: In Vivo Robustness Analysis of Cell Division Cycle in

Saccharomyces

cerevisiae

Hisao Moriya, Yuki Shimizu-Yoshida, Hiroaki Kitano

doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020111

InPLoS Genetics,volume 2, issue 7:

In the Results section, the reference to Figure S7C and S7D is incorrect; the correct reference is to Figure S6D.

This correction note may be found online at doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020218 Published December 29, 2006.

Citation: (2006) Correction: In vivo robustness analysis of cell division cycle inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 2(12): e218. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020218

Referências

Documentos relacionados

This paper explains the composition of BG from yeast ( Saccharomyces cerevisiae HOO31), oat ( Avena sativa L.) and mushroom ( Hericium erinaceus ), and also describes in vivo

Assim sendo, o presente estudo justifica-se por entender que é relevante o conhecimento das experiências e das práticas de EPS no processo de trabalho dos profissionais de saúde e

Para o levantamento de dados com os fornecedores de cana-de-açúcar, safra 2013/14, os principais indicadores técnicos de produção que apresentaram maior diferenciação em

synoviae FtsZ presents an extended amino acid sequence at the C-terminal portion of the protein, which may participate in interactions with other still unknown proteins crucial for

Intravenous administration of the oocyte test cell heparin to Wistar rats (both sexes, weighing ~300 g, N = 4 in each group) at a dose of 5.0 mg/kg body weight, which produced

The necrosis can be consequence of an inhibitory process of the pollen tube growth toward the ovule, which might be related to the low seed yield in Prata subgroup cultivars and

The distribution figures demonstrated that the radiolabeled compound was eliminated through the kidneys and accumulated in urine bladder in both the female and

Analysis of cell cycle distribution and apoptosis in melanoma cells overexpressing NOP14 showed that NOP14 overexpression induced cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase and