• Nenhum resultado encontrado

The Development of Agriculture and Trade Relations in the Caucasus in the Early 20th Century

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2016

Share "The Development of Agriculture and Trade Relations in the Caucasus in the Early 20th Century"

Copied!
8
0
0

Texto

(1)

Copyright © 2015 by Sochi State University

Published in the Russian Federation

Bylye Gody

Has been issued since 2006.

ISSN: 2073-9745

E-ISSN: 2310-0028

Vol. 38, Is. 4, pp. 1039-1046, 2015

http://bg.sutr.ru/

UDC 94 +33

The Development of Agriculture and Trade Relations in the Caucasus in the Early 20th Century

1 Tatiana E. Gvarliani 2 Evgeniya V. Vidishcheva

3 Ilya M. Rassolov

1 International Network Center for Fundamental and Applied Research, Russian Federation Dr (Economy), Professor

2 Sochi State University, Russian Federation PhD (Economy), Associate professor

3 Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Russian Federation Doctor of legal Sciences, Associate Professor

Abstract

The article analyzes the development of agriculture and trade relations in the Caucasus in the early 20th century. This article utilizes the records of Georgian national archives, pre-revolutionary periodicals and monographic literature published in pre-revolutionary, soviet and Russian contemporary periods.

The authors used the research methods such as principles of objectivity, historicism, systematic, comprehensive accounting of the economic indicators of agriculture development and trade in the Caucasus and the maximum possible neutrality of the researcher to interpret factual material.

The authors come to the conclusion that the development of agriculture in the Caucasus after the revolutionary upheavals of 1905-1907 years in the subsequent period before the First World War entered into the stage of recovery. The reasons of this phenomenon became the discovery of significant quantities of oil, cement, manganese and other fields. The objects of the industry demanded also the additional food supply, this enabled the agriculture in the Caucasus to develop actively.

Keywords: agriculture, trade, the Caucasus, early 20th century.

,

.

.

.

,

, ,

, .

, , ,

.

(2)

. . « 1905 »

[1], . « » [2] .

- B.C. [3],

. . [4] ., 1950–1970- . ,

,

.

. . «

XIX .», 1983 . «

» [5]. ,

«

». , ,

, , «

». ,

, .

,

:

,

( . . , . . [6]).

XX–XXI . . . [7], . . [8],

. . [9], . . [10] .

, .

. .

- , . . —

XIX .

« » . .

« ... » [11].

(« »),

. , ,

, .

,

-, .

,

, . , 1906

50 , 1908 6 .

. ,

,

. , ,

, .

, , ,

10—12 .

1910

.

.

, . 1910

11904 , 156867 .

, –67666 . 1912

10121, , 167535 . , 95 .

. 1910 1913 68 %,

– 64 %. ,

, 79,5 %, – 66,4 % [12].

, ,

. 1913 . ,

. , ,

, - ,

[13].

.

(3)

, .

. .

,

[15].

, 1905–1906 . .

, - . ,

1913 . , – .

,

,

, .

1911 . ,

307,7 .

18,6 . [16]. 231,8 .

49,9 . ,

326,3 ., 281,7 . 44,6

. ,

,

, . .

, 180 [17].

- , .

. , ( , , ) 1913 .

115, 1905 . 28, . . , 4 .

- 1913 . 500 .,

3,5 1905 (150 .).

.

1905 1:15. 1912 .

1:11 [18].

. .

-, , ,

,

, ,

, ., , , . .

1913–1914 . 634 (

-). 4,6 ,

8 15

.

, 574 . ,

;

5 ,

.

.

1913 . 361 ,

68,4 12 .

: ,

300 . ., 1500 . .,

, , , , ,

16 . 65 . , – 2 .

52 . [19].

-

. .

151 372 ,

240 41 132 .

99 241 , 62 134

38 107 .

, ,

, , ,

, , ,

,

(4)

, , ,

70 % .

, ,

.

,

. 1912 .

, 1913 .

. ,

, .

,

, ,

. ,

, 80 . .

29 , 50 % ,

– – [20].

1

1906–1912 .

( ) [21]

1906 296,6 49,8 35,0 120,2 78,9 239,1 231,2

1907 334,0 56,2 31,5 94,3 140,0 237,5 120,9

1908 316,9 48,4 36,0 76,6 167,0 278,0 83,7

1909 332,2 56,0 42,4 127,6 201,0 299,8 101,3

1910 349,8 62,8 63,1 190,0 242,9 304,5 240,4

1911 381,1 70,0 - 146,7 237,2 - 284,0

1912 351,05 75,0 40,6 - 227,5 358,7 -

1913 [22] 342,2 94,0 154,6 247,7 - - 257,1

1914 342,0 53,5 46,7 124,8 - 216,5 147,1

:

, ; – , , , .

: , , , ; – ,

, [23].

, ,

[24].

:

1) ;

2) .

, .

, . 2 . .

[25].

. .

1912 . 302 .

122 .

, [26].

,

, , , , , ,

. ,

.

, .

, , ,

. , , - .

, , , ,

, , .

,

. 1905 .

(5)

,

. , [28].

1913 .

37 % , , ,

, ., 63 % , .

37 % 35 %

( ); 1,5 %

0,36 % – [29].

.

.

,

, , , ,

[30].

1913 . .

, ,

( , ), ,

, 200–300 . ,

XVII , .

.

, ,

, ,

.

,

[31].

. 1905

4574 . , 342610 ,

219820 : 1912 19981,67 .,

4470433 4114705 . ,

, 5 [32].

,

, .

, , [33].

, , 1907 .

, – [34].

30 1907 . , ,

, , 800 .

« » : « ,

. » [35].

, ,

. 100 .

227 6 ,

, - ,

-. « ».

. [36].

,

. ,

[37].

1908 . ,

120 . [38].

, ,

. . . , 1911 . ,

.

3 1911 . ,

, , ,

[39].

, ,

(6)

.

, , . .

,

.

:

1. . 1905 . , 1914.

2. . // . 1909. . 1. № 4. . 513-515.

3. B.C. / B.C. //

. - - . . 25. . ,

1966. . 27-54.

4. . . .

., 1970.

5. . . XIX

// . 1983, № 4. . 35

6. . ., . . . ., 1994.

7. . . . . 2. , 2005.

8. : ( ).

, 2006.

9. . ., . . 1905–

1907 .: // . 2010. № 2. . 121–124.

10. . . : ( XIX –

.) // . . 2008. № 4. . 19–26.

11. . . :

. ., 2005.

12. . 1905 . , 1914. . 15.

13. . // . 1909. . 1. № 4. . 513-515.

14. . 1905 . , 1914. . 27.

15. . . 28.

16. . 1905 . , 1914. .19.

17. ( ). .13. .12. .622. . 4.

18. . 1905 . , 1914. . 36-37.

19. - . . . .,

1913. .22.

20. - . . . . - . ., 2005. . 116.

21. . .13. .12. .125. . 4.

22. . .13. .12. .622. . 4.

23. . .13. .12. .125. . 4.

24. . .13. .12. .125. . 8/ .

25. . 1905 . , 1914. . 33-34.

26. . . 35.

27. Shevchenko N.A. The Development of the Railway Network on the Black Sea (1914-1953 years) // The History of Land Transport, 2015, Vol. (1), № 1, . 19.

28. . 1905 . , 1914. . 35-36.

29. - . . . .,

1913. . 29.

30. . 1905 . , 1914. . 28-29.

31. . 1905 . , 1914. . 29.

32. . . 30.

33. // ( ), 1908. 3

34. // ( ), 1907. 26

35. . . // ( ), 1907. 30

36. // ( ), 1907. 7

37. // ( ), 1907. 28

38. // ( ), 1908. 14

39. // ( ), 1911. № 19

References:

1. Dariani S. Gruziya posle 1905 goda. Kutais, 1914.

2. Kancher E. Zemstvo i zadachi kooperatsii na Kavkaze // Na Kavkaze. 1909. T. 1. № 4. S. 513-515.

3. Gal'tsev B.C. K istorii poreformennogo razvitiya Severnogo Kavkaza / B.C. Gal'tsev // Izvestiya. Severo-Osetinskogo nauchno-issledovatel'skogo instituta. T. 25. Istoriya. Ordzhonikidze, 1966. s. 27-54.

(7)

5. Kinyapina N.S. Administrativnaya politika tsarizma na Kavkaze i v Srednei Azii v XIX veke // Voprosy istorii. 1983, № 4. S. 35

6. Bliev M.M., Degoev V.V. Kavkazskaya voina. M., 1994.

7. Matveev O.V. Mir slavyan Severnogo Kavkaza. Vyp. 2. Krasnodar, 2005.

8. Severokavkazskii uzel: osobennosti konfliktnogo potentsiala (istoricheskie ocherki). Pyatigorsk, 2006.

9. Yakushenko O.A., Cherkasov A.A. Namestnichestvo Kavkazskoe v revolyutsionnykh sobytiyakh

1905–1907 gg.: politicheskaya i kriminogennaya situatsii // Vestnik SGUTiKD. 2010. № 2. S. 121–124.

10. Ivantsov V.G. Kolonizatsiya Prichernomor'ya: razvitie dorozhnoi seti (konets XIX – nachalo vv.) // Bylye gody. Chernomorskii istoricheskii zhurnal. 2008. № 4. S. 19–26.

11. Shnaider V.G. Rossiya i Severnyi Kavkaz v dorevolyutsionnyi period: osobennosti integratsionnykh protsessov. M., 2005.

12. Dariani S. Gruziya posle 1905 goda. Kutais, 1914. s. 15.

13. Kancher E. Zemstvo i zadachi kooperatsii na Kavkaze // Na Kavkaze. 1909. T. 1. № 4. S. 513-515. 14. Dariani S. Gruziya posle 1905 goda. Kutais, 1914. s. 27.

15. Tam zhe. s. 28.

16. Dariani S. Gruziya posle 1905 goda. Kutais, 1914. s.19. 17. Natsional'nyi arkhiv Gruzii (NAG). F.13. Op.12. D.622. L. 4. 18. Dariani S. Gruziya posle 1905 goda. Kutais, 1914. s. 36-37.

19. Vorontsov-Dashkov I.I. Vsepoddaniishii otchet za vosem' let upravleniya Kavkazom. SPb., 1913. s.22.

20. Ismail-Zade D.I. I.I. Vorontsov-Dashkov kavkazskii namestnik. M., 2005. s. 116. 21. NAG. F.13. Op.12. D.125. L. 4.

22. NAG. F.13. Op.12. D.622. L. 4. 23. NAG. F.13. Op.12. D.125. L. 4. 24. NAG. F.13. Op.12. D.125. L. 8/OB.

25. Dariani S. Gruziya posle 1905 goda. Kutais, 1914. s. 33-34. 26. Tam zhe. s. 35.

27. Shevchenko N.A. The Development of the Railway Network on the Black Sea (1914-1953 years) // The History of Land Transport, 2015, Vol. (1), № 1, r. 19.

28. Dariani S. Gruziya posle 1905 goda. Kutais, 1914. s. 35-36.

29. Vorontsov-Dashkov I.I. Vsepoddaniishii otchet za vosem' let upravleniya Kavkazom. SPb., 1913. s. 29.

30. Dariani S. Gruziya posle 1905 goda. Kutais, 1914. s. 28-29. 31. Dariani S. Gruziya posle 1905 goda. Kutais, 1914. s. 29. 32. Tam zhe. s. 30.

33. Tiflis // Novoe vremya (Peterburg), 1908. 3 aprelya

34. Na Kavkaze // Russkoe slovo (Moskva), 1907. 26 oktyabrya 35. Na Kavkaze. Baku. // Russkoe slovo (Moskva), 1907. 30 noyabrya 36. Na Kavkaze // Russkoe slovo (Moskva), 1907. 7 dekabrya

37. Na Kavkaze // Russkoe slovo (Moskva), 1907. 28 dekabrya 38. Na Kavkaze // Russkoe slovo (Moskva), 1908. 14 maya 39. Tiflis // Tifliskii listok (Tiflis), 1911. № 19

94 +33

К

1

2

3

1 ,

,

2 ,

,

3 . . ,

,

.

(8)

, ,

, , .

, , ,

.

, ,

1905–1907 . ,

.

, , . .

,

.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

i) A condutividade da matriz vítrea diminui com o aumento do tempo de tratamento térmico (Fig.. 241 pequena quantidade de cristais existentes na amostra já provoca um efeito

Peça de mão de alta rotação pneumática com sistema Push Button (botão para remoção de broca), podendo apresentar passagem dupla de ar e acoplamento para engate rápido

Extinction with social support is blocked by the protein synthesis inhibitors anisomycin and rapamycin and by the inhibitor of gene expression 5,6-dichloro-1- β-

Neste trabalho o objetivo central foi a ampliação e adequação do procedimento e programa computacional baseado no programa comercial MSC.PATRAN, para a geração automática de modelos

Ousasse apontar algumas hipóteses para a solução desse problema público a partir do exposto dos autores usados como base para fundamentação teórica, da análise dos dados

In an earlier work 关16兴, restricted to the zero surface tension limit, and which completely ignored the effects of viscous and magnetic stresses, we have found theoretical

gulbenkian música mecenas estágios gulbenkian para orquestra mecenas música de câmara mecenas concertos de domingo mecenas ciclo piano mecenas coro gulbenkian. FUNDAÇÃO

repercussão sobre a saúde humana e atuar junto aos órgãos municipais e estaduais para controlá-las. 16) Participar da execução, do controle e da avaliação das