w ww.e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / b j p
Original
Article
Impact
of
light
quality
on
flavonoid
production
and
growth
of
Hyptis
marrubioides
seedlings
cultivated
in
vitro
Rita
Cassia
N.
Pedroso
a,
Núbia
Angelica
A.
Branquinho
a,
Alessandra
C.B.A.M.
Hara
a,
Alan
Carlos
Costa
a,
Fabiano
Guimarães
Silva
a,
Leticia
P.
Pimenta
b,
Marcio
Luiz
A.
Silva
b,
Wilson
Roberto
Cunha
b,
Patricia
M.
Pauletti
b,
Ana
Helena
Januario
b,∗aInstitutoFederaldeEducac¸ão,CiênciaeTecnologiaGoiano,CâmpusRioVerde,RioVerde,GO,Brazil bNúcleodePesquisaemCiênciasExataseTecnológicas,UniversidadedeFranca,Franca,SP,Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received2November2016 Accepted22December2016 Availableonline28March2017
Keywords:
Flavonoid
Hyptismarrubioides Invitroculture Lightquality
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
HyptismarrubioidesEpling,Lamiaceae,aspeciesfromBrazilianCerrado,hasbeenusedagainst gastroin-testinalinfections,skininfections,pain,andcramps.Herein,H.marrubioidesseedlingswerecultured invitrounderdifferentwavelengths(white,blue,green,red,andyellow)with50molm−2s−1
irra-dianceanda16-hphotoperiod.After20and30daysofcultivation,shootlength,leafnumber,fresh mass,anddrymasswereevaluated.TheflavonoidrutincontentwasdeterminedbytheHPLC-DAD method.Theshootswerelongerinplantscultivatedunderyellow(16.603±0.790cm,1.8-fold),red (15.465±0.461cm,1.7-fold),andgreen(14.677±0.737cm,1.6-fold)lightsthanincontrolplantsexposed towhitelight(9.203±0.388cm).Thenumberofleavesincreasedinplantsexposedtored(23.425±1.138, 1.1-fold)andgreen(22.725±1.814,1.1-fold)lights,comparedtocontrolplants(20.133±0.827).Fresh (0.665±0.048g,1.2-fold)and dry (0.066±0.005g,1.3-fold) mass ofseedlingswere thehighestin seedlingsgrownunderredlight,comparedtoseedlingsgrownunderwhitelight(0.553±0.048and 0.028±0.004,respectively).However,rutinproductionwashigherunderwhite(0.308mgg−1ofdry
weight)andbluelights(0.298mgg−1ofdryweight).Thus,redlightinducesplantgrowthandincreases
leafnumberanddryweightininvitro-cultivatedH.marrubioides,whereasblueandwhitelightspromote thegreatestrutinaccumulation.
©2017SociedadeBrasileiradeFarmacognosia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisisanopen accessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Introduction
The genus Hyptis, Lamiaceae, comprises about 300 species, widely distributed, occurring mainly in tropical regions of the AmericasandAfrica.HyptismarrubioidesEpling,commonlyknown asmint-of-field,isaspeciesoftheBrazilianCerradotraditionally usedtotreatgastrointestinalandskininfections,pain,andcramps (McNeiletal.,2011).ThepharmacologicalpotentialofH. marru-bioideshasbeenpreviously investigated,andmoststudieshave focusedon examination of thechemical composition of essen-tialoils, themaincomponentsof which arethesesquiterpenes caryophylla-4(14),8(15)-dien-5-ol,eudesma-4(15),7-dien-1-ol, caryophyllene oxide, and -caryophyllene (Sales et al., 2007; McNeiletal.,2011).EssentialoilsofH.marrubioideshavealsobeen studiedtoinvestigatetheirpotentialforpestcontrolinagriculture, suchasthepreventionandcontrolof Asiansoybeanrust(Silva
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:ana.januario@unifran.edu.br(A.H.Januario).
etal.,2012b)andtreatmentofColletotrichumtruncatum-infected soybeanseeds(Silvaetal.,2012a).
Theuseofmicropropagationtechniqueshasgreatadvantages intheproductionofhigh-qualityseedlings,astheyimprovetheir pharmacologicalpotential(RaoandRavishankar,2002)by ensur-ingthereproductionofidentical,high-qualityplants(Serafinietal., 2001),whichinturnenhancesthebiosynthesisofspecial metabo-lites(BhuiyanandAdachi,2003;Zhaoetal.,2005).However,the accumulationofsecondarymetabolitesinplantsisinfluencedby variousenvironmentalfactorssuchaslightquality,UVirradiation, temperature,irrigation,nutrientdeficiency,pathogenattack,and heavymetalstress(DixonandPaiva,1995;Winkel-Shirley,2002; KopsellandKopsell,2008).
Lightisakeyabioticelicitorinplantsthataffects,directlyor indirectly,growthanddevelopmentofplants,mainlyofthose dis-tributedinhigh-latitudeareas(MoriniandMuleo,2003;OuYang etal.,2015).Plantresponsesdonotdependonlyontheabsenceor presenceoflightbutalsoonthevariationinlightquality(Felippe, 1986).Theactionoflightonplantsoccursmainlyintwoaspects: first,thelightsourceprovidestheenergyrequiredbytheplantfor
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2016.12.004
photosynthesis,especiallyredandbluelight,andsecond,asa sig-nalreceivedbyphotoreceptorsitregulatesgrowth,differentiation, andplantmetabolism(Wangetal.,2001).
Lightisoneofthemostsignificantenvironmentalfactors affect-ingtheaccumulationofflavonoidsinplants(Huché-Thélieretal., 2016). However, the biosynthesis of flavonoids in response to lightqualityneedtobebetterunderstood,especiallyin invitro culture.
Studiesinvolvingtheinfluenceoflight ontheproduction of secondarymetabolitesandgrowthparametersinH.marrubioides seedlingscultivatedinvitroarenon-existent.Inapreviousstudy, wehaveevaluatedthephytochemicalprofileof H.marrubioides microplantsinoculatedwithisolatesofbacteriaand endophytic fungi(Vitorinoetal.,2013).PhotosyntheticstudiesinH. marru-bioidesinvitrocultureinvolvingmeasuringgasexchangewerealso conductedbyourresearchgroupandtheirradianceeffects,flow rate,andairhumidityparameterswereinvestigated.Inaddition, thechlorophyllafluorescenceand chloroplastidicpigment con-tentwerealsoassessed(Costaetal.,2014).Hence,theaimofthe presentstudywastoassesstheeffectoflightqualityongrowthof H.marrubioidesseedlingsinvitroandtheirflavonoidproduction. Thisstudyfurthersourunderstandingofthefactorsthatpromote thegrowthandincreasetheresistanceofthismedicinalspecies, throughtheproductionofflavonoids.
Materialsandmethods
Plantmaterialandinvitrocultivation
Seedlings previously established via in vitro germination of Hyptis marrubioidesEpling,Lamiaceae,seedssuitable for inocu-lation obtained onthe experimental field of the Laboratory of PlantTissue Cultureof theInstitutoFederal deEducac¸ão, Ciên-ciaeTecnologiaGoiano,CampusRioVerde.Avoucherspecimen (HRV71) hasbeen deposited at the Herbarium of the Institute (HerbariumHRV).
Theseedsweredisinfectedwith0.2%Bendazol(carbendazim) and0.2%Alterno(tebuconazole)for1h,followedbytreatmentwith 1%sodiumhypochlorite for30min,andthenrinsedthrice with steriledistilledwater.Seedsweregerminatedandmaintainedon Murashige&Skoogmedium(MurashigeandSkoog,1962) supple-mentedwith30gl−1ofsucroseandsolidifiedwithagarat3.5gl−1; thepHwasadjustedto5.8beforeautoclaving.Thecultureswere incubatedinagrowthchamberfor30daysat50molm−2s−1 pho-tosyntheticallyactiveradiation(PAR),atanaveragetemperature of23±1◦C,andaphotoperiodof16h.Thereafter,theseedlings
weresub-culturedonthesamemediumandincubatedinagrowth cabinetfor10daysat50molm−2s−1PAR,23±1◦C,and16-h
pho-toperiod.Allexperimentswerecarriedoutinglassflaskscontaining 50mlofsemisolidmediumwithfiveseedlingsperflaskwithatotal offortyseedlings.
Lightconditions
After 10 days, the cultures were transferred to a cabinet andexposed tocontinuingirradiationofdifferentlightspectra: white(300–750nm),blue(400–490nm),green(490–560nm),red (600–700nm),andyellow(560–590nm).Thespecificlight condi-tionsweremaintainedusingTP40Wlamps(Taschibra® Indaial, SantaCatarina,Brazil),atalightintensityof50molm2s−1 and aphotoperiodof16h.Thecultureswereevaluatedafter20and 30daysoflightexposure.Culturesgrownunderwhitelightwere usedasacontrol.Forweightmeasurements,thewholeseedlings withoutrootswasconsidered.
Chemicalanalysis
The seedlingswere driedat 35◦C in a forcedair circulation
ovenand thedrybiomass(200mg)fromtheinvitrocultureof H.marrubioides wasextractedwith4ml methanol ofhigh per-formanceliquid chromatography(HPLC)gradeusingultrasound bath(30min).Thesampleshadbeenpreviouslyfilteredthrough a0.2-msyringefilterwithhydrophilicPTFEmembrane (Advan-tec,Dublin,CA,USA)andtransferredinto1-mlHPLCvials.These procedureswereconductedintriplicate.
Forthequantitativeanalysis,solutionsweredoneinHPLCgrade methanoltoobtainsolutionscontaining0.500,0.250,0.125,and 0.063mgml−1 rutin.Eachstandardsolutionwasinjectedin trip-licate. The calibration curve wasconstructed to determine the linearityofthemethodbyplottingthepeakareaversusthe con-centrationofthesubstanceinmgml−1.Thequantitativeanalysis byHPLCwithdiode-arraydetection(DAD)wascarriedoutona ShimadzuProminenceLC-20AD binarysystemequippedwitha DGU-20A5 degasser, an SPD-20A series diode arraydetector, a CBM-20A communicationbus module,anSIL-20A HT autosam-pler,andaCTO-20Acolumnoven(Shimadzu,Kyoto,Japan).The analyseswereconductedonaGeminiODScolumn(250×4.6mm, 5m; Phenomenex,Aschaffenburg, Germany) equippedwith a pre-columnwiththesamematerialunderthefollowingconditions: injectionvolume setat20l,flow rateof 1.0mlmin−1, mobile phasewasCH3OH/H2O/HOAc(5:94.9:0.1,v/v/v)deliveredina lin-eargradientuntil100%CH3OHin30min,10minat100%CH3OH, and20mintoreturntotheinitialconditions.TheUVdetectionwas setat254nmand40◦C.
MethanolusedintheexperimentswasHPLCgradeanditwas obtainedfromJ.T. Baker (AvantorPerformance Materials, Cen-ter Valley, PA, USA). Ultrapure water was obtainedby passing redistilledwaterthrougha Direct-QUV3 systemfromMillipore (Billerica,MA,USA).Theflavonoidrutinusedasexternalstandard wasacquiredfromthestandardbankoftheNaturalProductsGroup oftheUniversidadedeFranca.
Statisticalanalyses
Thestatisticalanalysiswasperformedin Sisvar5.3software (Ferreira,2011).Theexperimentwasconductedinacompletely randomizeddesignwithfourreplications.Themulti-factorial anal-ysisofvariancefollowedbyTukeymultiplecomparisontestswere usedforstatisticalcomparisons(p≤0.05).
Results
Seedlingsgrowth
ThemeasuredgrowthparametersofH.marrubioidesseedlings cultivated in vitro under different wavelengths showed signif-icant difference (Table 1). During the 20-day cultivation, the seedlingsexposedtoredlightshowedthehighestshootlengths (10.175±0.669cm), which was 1.69-fold higher than the cor-responding lengths of control seedlings (6.035±0.511cm). In addition,after30daysofirradiationwithgreen,red,andyellow lights, thelengthof the shoots increased1.8-fold compared to seedlingsexposedtowhitelight.Thenumberofexpandedleaves wasnotaffectedbylightconditionsafter20daysoftreatment; however,after30daysofculture,greenandredlightpromoted themosttheincreaseinthenumberofleaves(22.725±1.814and 23.425±1.138,respectively).
Table1
ShootlengthandaveragenumberofexpandedleavesofHyptismarrubioidesseedlingssubmittedto20and30daysoflighttreatment.
Lighttreatments Evaluationtime(days) Evaluationtime(days)
20 30 20 30
Averageshootlength(cm) Averageleafnumber
White 6.035aBb±0.511b 9.203Ca±0.388 12.475Ab±0.927 20.133Ba±0.827
Blue 8.400Ab±0.453 13.030Ba±0.865 13.143Ab±0.667 17.750Ba±1.293 Green 9.900Ab±0.823 14.677Aa±0.737 13.514Ab±0.676 22.725Aa±1.814 Red 10.175Ab±0.669 15.465Aa±0.461 12.600Ab±1.223 23.425Aa±1.138 Yellow 9.871Ab± 0.462 16.603Aa± 0.790 11.143Ab± 1.166 20.067Ba± 0.935
CV(%) 15.46 18.87
Freshweight(g) Dryweight(g)
White 0.311Ab± 0.059 0.553Aa± 0.048 0.028Ab± 0.003 0.052Ba± 0.004 Blue 0.306Ab±0.024 0.549Aa±0.042 0.033Ab±0.002 0.057Ba±0.004 Green 0.334Ab±0.046 0.534Aa±0.053 0.034Ab±0.003 0.053Ba±0.004 Red 0.404Ab±0.067 0.665Aa±0.048 0.035Ab±0.004 0.066Aa±0.005 Yellow 0.246Ab±0.018 0.426Aa±0.025 0.025Ab±0.001 0.045Ba±0.002
CV(%) 29.77 22.14
aMeansfollowedbythesameuppercaseletterinthecolumnandlowercaseletterintherowdonotdiffersignificantlyaccordingtotheScott-Knotttestat5%probability.
b Mean±standarderror.
CV,coefficientofvariation.
Table2
Accumulationofrutin(mgg−1dryweight)inHyptismarrubioidesseedlings
irradi-atedwithwhite,blue,green,red,andyellowlightsfor20and30days.
Lighttreatment Evaluationtime
Rutincontent(20days) (mgg−1dryweight)
Rutincontent(30days) (mgg−1dryweight)
White 0.243aA±0.012b 0.308A±0.012
Blue 0.084D±0.004 0.298A±0.007 Green 0.101C± 0.002 0.198C± 0.002 Red 0.105C± 0.006 0.192C± 0.002 Yellow 0.126B±0.002 0.262B±0.006
aMeansfollowedbythesameletterdonotdiffersignificantlyaccordingtothe
Tukeytestat5%probability.
b Mean±standarderror.
seedlings increased1.27-fold (0.066±0.005g) compared to dry weightofthecontrolseedlings(0.052±0.004g).
Accumulationofrutinflavonoid
Methanolextracts ofrutin obtainedfrom seedlings cultured under different lights for 20 and 30 days was quantitatively assessedusingHPLC-DADanalysis(Table2).Theresponseofthe UVdetectorat254nmwaslinearfrom0.063a0.500mgml−1for rutin.Theobtainedregressionequationwasy=4.0×107x−69,442 withacorrelationcoefficient(R2)of0.9998.After20daysof cul-ture,theaccumulationofrutininallsampleswaslowerthanthat inthecontrol(0.243mgg−1dryweight(DW));thelowestamount ofrutinwasdetectedinplantsexposedtobluelight(0.084mgg−1 DW).However,after30daysoftreatment,theamountofrutinin seedlingsexposedtobluelight(0.298mgg−1DW)wasnot signif-icantlydifferenttothatin controlseedlings(0.308mgg−1 DW), whereasitscontentinseedlingsexposedtogreen(0.198mgg−1 DW),red(0.192mgg−1DW),andyellow(0.262mgg−1DW)lights was reduced significantly compared to that in control plants. Overalltheresultsdemonstratedthattherutincontentin micro-propagatedplantswaslowerthanthatfoundinwildplantsofH. marrubioides(1.259mgg−1DW)obtainedinpreviousstudies con-ductedbyourresearchgroup.
Discussion
Lightqualityhasimportanteffectsonplantgrowthand develop-ment,especiallyforphotosynthesisandphotomorphogenesis,the twoprocessesthat,throughsignalsreceivedbythephotoreceptors, regulateplantgrowth,differentiation,andmetabolism(Guoetal., 2007).Plantgrowthcanbeaffectedbyendogenoushormonelevels interactionswithlightquality.Theinteractionoflightqualitywith planthormonepathwaysinregulationgrowthofvegetalspecies includesgibberellins(GAs),auxinsbeingthemostcommonisthe indoleaceticacid(IAA),cytokinins(CKs),andabscisicacid(ABA) (OuYangetal.,2015).
AnotherstudyfoundthatthelevelsofendogenousCKs,IAA,and GAsaremarkedlyincreasedinresponsetolow-intensityredto far-redlightatlowornormalPAR,promotingthegrowthofhypocotyls inHelianthusannuus(Kurepinetal.,2007).
Transcriptome analysis of Norway spruce (Picea abies) by OuYang and collaborators revealed that red and blue light are associated with plant growth and developmentand phytohor-monemetabolism(OuYangetal.,2015).Inaddition,theyreported thatbluelightpromotesIAAaccumulationandphenylpropanoid biosynthesis.Incontrast,redlightaffectsstemgrowthby regulat-ingbiosynthesisofGAs.Inlinewiththeseresults,Thweetal.(2014) reportedthatirradiationwithbluelightincreasespolyphenol con-tentinlettuceandinducestheproductionofrutinandcyanidin 3-O-rutinosideinFagopyrumtataricum.
The evaluation of growth parameters in H. marrubioides seedlingsculturedinvitroinourstudyshowthatredlightalmost doubledthelengthofshootsandincreasedthenumberofleaves anddrybiomasscomparedtothecontrol.Concerningthe produc-tionofsecondarymetabolites,wefoundthatblueandwhitelight favoredthebiosynthesisoftheflavonoidrutin.
Jeong et al. (2012) studied the influences of four differ-ent light-emitting diode lights on flowering and polyphenol variationsintheleavesofchrysanthemum(Chrysanthemum mori-folium).Theluteolin-7-O-glucoside,luteolin-7-O-glucuronideand quercetagetin-trimethylethershowedhighestyieldundergreen light.Ontheotherhand,dicaeoylquinicacidisomer,dicaeoylquinic acidisomer,naringenin,andapigenin-7-O-glucuronidewere great-est under red light. Taulavuori et al. (2016) evaluated the differences in synthesis offlavonoids and phenolic acids under increasing periodsof enhanced blue light in leaves red lettuce andbasil.Flavonoidsandphenolicacidswerefoundtobespecies dependent. Dicaffeoyltartaric acidwas the majorcompound in lettuce while rosmaric acid was the prodominant compound inbasil.
Theseexamplessuggestthatthepolyphenolproductionis influ-encedbylightqualitycomposition.
Ourresultsonthegrowthandmetabolismofinvitro-cultured seedlings of H. marrubioides are in accordance with the data describedbyOuYangetal.(2015)andThweetal.(2014)aswell thedatareportedforotherplantspecies(Vreugdenhiletal.,1998; Kvaalen andAppelgren, 1999;Leal-Costaet al.,2010;Ouzounis etal.,2015).
In summary, we concludethat for the invitro cultureof H. marrubioides light quality is an important parameter that can be utilized to optimize seedlings growth and accumulation of rutin,inparticulartheredandbluelights,whicharebeneficialto growthandrutinmetabolism,respectively.Therefore,ourresults may be useful as theoretical basis for studies related to qual-itycontrolofgrowthandproductionofsecondarymetabolismof H.marrubioides.
Ethicaldisclosures
Protectionofhumanandanimalsubjects. Theauthorsdeclare thatnoexperimentswereperformedonhumansoranimalsfor thisstudy.
Confidentialityofdata. Theauthorsdeclarethatnopatientdata appearinthisarticle.
Righttoprivacyandinformedconsent. Theauthorsdeclarethat nopatientdataappearinthisarticle.
Authors’contributions
RCNPandNAABperformedtheinvitroexperiments,ACBAMH contributed to the supervision of laboratory work,and critical reading of the manuscript, RCNP and LPP contributed to the chromatographicanalysis,ACC,FGS,MLAS,WRC,PMPandAHJ con-tributedtotheanalysisofexperimentaldataandcriticalrevision. Allauthorshelpedinpreparingthepaperandapprovedthe sub-missionofthefinalversion.
Conflictsofinterest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
Acknowledgments
TheauthorsaregratefultoCNPq(Grant#305783/2012-2)and FAPESP(Grant#2011/00631-5)forfinancial support.Fundac¸ão de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás (FAPEG, Grant # 201310267000257)arealsoacknowledgedforfellowship.
References
Awad,M.A.,Wagenmakers,P.S.,deJager,A.,2001.Effectsoflightonflavonoidand chlorogenicacidlevelsintheskinof‘Jonagold’apples.Sci.Hort.88,289–298. Bhuiyan,N.H.,Adachi,T.,2003.Stimulationofbetacyaninsynthesisthrough
exoge-nousmethyljasmonateandotherelicitorsinsuspension-culturedcellsof
Portulaca.J.Plant.Physiol.160,1117–1124.
Costa,A.C.,Rosa,M.,Megguer,C.A.,Silva,F.G.,Pereira,F.D.,Otoni,W.C.,2014.A reliablemethodologyforassessingtheinvitrophotosyntheticcompetenceof twoBraziliansavannaspecies:HyptismarrubioidesandHancorniaspeciosa.Plant CellTissueOrganCult.117,443–454.
Dixon,R.A.,Paiva,N.L.,1995.Stress-inducedphenylpropanoidmetabolism.Plant Cell7,1085–1097.
Felippe,G.M.,1986.Fotomorfogênese.In:Ferri,G.M.(Ed.),FisiologiaVegetal2.EPU, SãoPaulo,pp.231–280.
Ferreira,D.F.,2011.SISVAR–Sistemadeanálisedevariância.Versão5.3.UFLA, Lavras,MinasGerais.
Guo,B.,Liu,Y.G.,Yan,Q.,Liu,C.Z.,2007.Spectralcompositionofirradiation regu-latesthecellgrowthandflavonoidsbiosynthesisincallusculturesofSaussurea medusaMaxim.PlantGrowthRegul.52,259–263.
Huché-Thélier,L.,Crespel,L.,LeGourrierec,J.,Morel,P.,SoulaimanSakr,S.,Nathalie Leduc,L.,2016.LightsignalingandplantresponsestoblueandUVradiations– perspectivesforapplicationsinhorticulture.Environ.Exp.Bot.121,22–38. Jeong,S.W.,Park,S.,Jin,J.S.,Seo,O.N.,Kim,G.S.,Kim,Y.H.,Bae,H.,Lee,G.,Kim,
S.T.,Lee,W.S.,Shin,S.C.,2012.Influencesoffourdifferentlight-emittingdiode lightsonfloweringandpolyphenolvariationsintheleavesofChrysanthemum (Chrysanthemummorifolium).J.Agric.FoodChem.60,9793–9800.
Kopsell,D.A.,Kopsell,D.E.,2008.Geneticandenvironmentalfactorsaffectingplant lutein/zeaxanthin.Agro.FoodInd.Hi-Tech.19,44–46.
Kurepin,L.V.,Emery,R.J.,Pharis,R.P.,Reid,D.M.,2007.Theinteractionoflightquality andirradiancewithgibberellins,cytokininsandauxininregulatinggrowthof
Helianthusannuushypocotyls.PlantCellEnviron.30,147–155.
Kvaalen,H.,Appelgren,M.,1999.Lightqualityinfluencesgermination,rootgrowth andhypocotylelongationinsomaticembryosbutnotinseedlingsofNorway spruce.InVitroCell.Dev.Biol.Plant.35,437–441.
Leal-Costa,M.V.,Nascimento,L.B.,Moreira,N.,dos,S.,Reinert,F.,Costa,S.S.,Lage, C.L.,Tavares,E.S.,2010.Influenceofbluelightontheleafmorphoanatomyof
invitroKalanchoepinnata(Lamarck)Persoon(Crassulaceae).Microsc.Microanal. 16,576–582.
McNeil,M.,Facey,P.,Porter,R.,2011.EssentialoilsfromtheHyptisgenus–areview (1909–2009).Nat.Prod.Commun.6,1775–1796.
Morini,S.,Muleo,R.,2003.Effectsoflightqualityonmicropropagationofwoody species.In:Jain,S.M.,Ishii,K.(Eds.),MicropropagationofWoodyTreesand Fruits.KluwerAcademicPublishers,Dordrecht,pp.3–35.
Murashige,T.,Skoog,F.A.,1962.Arevisedmediumforrapidgrowthandbioassays withtobaccotissuescultures.Physiol.Plant.15,473–497.
OuYang, F.,Mao, J.F.,Wang, J.,Zhang,S.,Li, Y.,2015. Transcriptomeanalysis revealsthatredandbluelightregulategrowthandphytohormonemetabolism in Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst]. PLOS ONE, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0127896.
Ouzounis, T., Parjikolaei, B.R., Fretté, X., Rosenqvist, E., Ottosen, C.O., 2015. Predawnandhighintensityapplicationofsupplementalbluelightdecreases the quantum yield of PSII and enhances the amount of phenolic acids, flavonoids,andpigmentsinLactucasativa.Front.PlantSci.,http://dx.doi.org/10. 3389/fpls.2015.00019.
Rao,S.R.,Ravishankar,G.A.,2002.Plantcellcultures:chemicalfactoriesofsecondary metabolites.Biotechnol.Adv.20,101–153.
Sales,J.F.,Pinto,J.E.B.P.,Botrel,P.P.,Oliveira,C.B.A.,Ferri,P.H.,Paula,J.R.,Seraphin, J.C.,2007.CompositionandchemicalvariabilityintheessentialoilinHyptis marrubioidesEpl.J.Essent.OilRes.19,552–556.
Serafini,L.A.,Barros,N.M.,Azevedo,J.L.,2001.Biotecnologia:princípioseaplicac¸ões. In:Serafini,L.A.,Barros,N.M.,Azevedo,J.L.(Eds.),Biotecnologianaagriculturae naagroindústria.Agropecuária,Guaíba,pp.25–75.
Silva,A.C.,Souza,P.E.,Machado,J.C.,Silva,B.M.,Pinto,J.E.B.P.,2012a.Effectiveness ofessentialoilsinthetreatmentofColletotrichumtruncatum-infectedsoybean seeds.Trop.PlantPathol.37,305–313.
Silva,A.C.,Souza,P.E.,Pinto,J.E.B.P.,Silva,B.M.,Amaral,D.C.,ArrudaCarvalho,E., 2012b.EssentialoilsforpreventativetreatmentandcontrolofAsiansoybean rust.Eur.J.PlantPathol.134,865–871.
Taulavuori, K.,Hyöky,V., Oksanen,J.,Taulavuori,E., Julkunen-Tiitto,R.,2016. Species-specificdifferencesinsynthesisofflavonoidsandphenolicacidsunder increasingperiodsofenhancedbluelight.Environ.Exp.Bot.121,145–150. Thwe,A.A.,Kim,Y.B.,Li,X.,Seo,J.M.,Kim,S.J.,Suzuki,T.,Chung,S.O.,Park,S.U.,2014.
Effectsoflight-emittingdiodesonexpressionofphenylpropanoidbiosynthetic genesandaccumulationofphenylpropanoidsinFagopyrumtataricumsprouts. J.Agric.FoodChem.62,4839–4845.
Vitorino,L.C.,Silva,F.G.,Lima,W.C.,Soares,M.A.,Pedroso,R.C.N.,Silva,M.R.,Dias, H.J.,Crotti,A.E.M.,Silva,M.L.A.,Cunha,W.R.,Pauletti,P.M.,Januário,A.H.,2013. MetabolicresponseinducedbyendophyticfungiandbacteriainH.marrubioides
Eplinginvitromicroplants.Quim.Nova36,1014–1020.
Vreugdenhil,D.,Boogaard,Y.,Visser,R.G.F.,deBruijn,S.M.,1998.Comparisonof tuberandshootformationfrominvitroculturedpotatoexplants.PlantCell TissueOrganCult.53,197–204.
Wang,Y.C.,Zhang,Z.X.,Zhao,X.F.,Yuan,X.F.,2001.ImprovedgrowthofArtemisia annuaL.hairyrootsand artemisinproductionunderredlightconditions. Biotechnol.Lett.23,1971–1973.
Winkel-Shirley,B.,2002.Biosynthesisofflavonoidsandeffectsofstress.Curr.Opin. PlantBiol.5,218–223.
Yousefzadi,M.,Sharifi,M.,Behmanesh,M.,Ghasempour,A.,Moyano,E.,Palazon,J., 2012.Theeffectoflightongeneexpressionandpodophyllotoxinbiosynthesis inLinumalbumcellculture.PlantPhysiol.Biochem.56,41–46.