Rev Bras
Cineantropom
Hum
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2018v20n5p402
original article
Effect of a school soccer competition with
consecutive day games on the recovery status
of U-19 players
Efeito de uma competição escolar de futebol com jogos
em dias consecutivos no estado de recuperação de
jogadores sub-19
Suene Franciele Nunes Chaves1
Matheus Santos Cerqueira1
Guilherme Tucher1
Bernardo Miloski2
Daniel Barbosa Coelho3
Diego de Alcantara Borba4
Pedro M. Q. Pimenta5
João B. Ferreira-Júnior1
Abstract – The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of a school soccer competition with consecutive day games on the recovery status of U-19 players. Thirty-one school athletes (17.1±1.1 years) who played a U-19 school soccer competition (composed of two groups of four soccer teams each, followed by semifinals and final) were randomly evaluated. Games lasted 70 min (two periods of 35 min with 15 min rest interval), and they were played on consecutive days with 24 h between each game. Delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) and Total Quality Recovery (TQR) were measured before group phase games (n= 31) and semifinals games (n= 18). The internal game load was measured by the session rate of perceived exertion (session-RPE) method. TQR was higher before the first game when compared to the other games (p< 0.001). DOMS increased after the first game and did not return to baseline before the fourth game. Both session-RPE and internal load of the fourth game were higher than in the other games (p< 0.001). In addition, there was no correlation between internal game load and TQR (p> 0.05). The monotony observed during the evaluated period was 3.1±2.0 AU. The results indicate that the 24 h rest period seems to be insufficient for complete recovery of U-19 soccer school athletes, suggesting the organization of U-19 school soccer competitions with higher rest interval between games and search for methods to increase the recovery rate.
Key words: Muscle soreness; Recovery; Soccer.
Resumo – O presente estudo objetivou analisar o efeito de uma competição escolar de futebol com jogos em dias consecutivos no estado de recuperação física de jogadores sub-19. Foram avaliados, de forma aleatória, 31 atletas escolares (17,1±1,1 anos) participantes de uma competição escolar de futebol de campo sub-19, composta de duas chaves com quatro equipes cada, seguido de semifinais e final. Os jogos tiveram 70 min de duração (dois tempos de 35 min com 15 min de intervalo), e foram realizados em dias consecutivos com intervalo de 24h entre cada jogo. Foi medida a dor muscular de início tardio (DOMS) e Qualidade Total de Recuperação (QTR) antes de cada jogo da primeira fase (n= 31) e da semifinal (n=18). A carga interna dos jogos foi medida a pelo método da percepção subjetiva do esforço da sessão (PSE-sessão). A QTR foi maior antes do primeiro jogo em comparação com os demais jogos (p< 0.001). A DOMS aumentou após o primeiro jogo e não retornou aos valores basais antes do quarto jogo (p< 0.001). A PSE-sessão e a carga interna do quarto jogo foram maiores que as dos demais jogos (p< 0,001). Em adição, não houve correlação entre a carga interna do jogo e a QTR (p> 0,05). A monotonia encontra-da no período avaliado foi de 3,1±2.0 UA. Os resultados indicam que o período de 24h parece ser insuficiente para a completa recuperação de atletas escolares de futebol sub-19, sugerindo a organização de competições escolares de futebol sub-19 com maior intervalo entre os jogos e busca
1 Federal Institute of Sudeste of Minas Gerais. Rio Pomba, MG. Brazil.
2 Federal Institute of Sudeste of Minas Gerais. Barbacena, MG. Brazil.
3 University of Ouro Preto. Sports Center. Ouro Preto, MG. Brazil.
4 University of the State of Minas Gerais. Department of Human Move-ment Sciences. Ibirité, MG. Brazil.
5 Polytechnic Institute of Bragança. Bragança. Portugal
Sedentary, physically active or even athletic subjects may present decreased performance shortly after physical training sessions or competitions, as a result of fatigue or exercise-induced muscle damage1. Fatigue is
charac-terized by transient decrease in performance, considered as a protective mechanism resulting from the performance of intense or prolonged exer-cise that modulates exerexer-cise intensity1. Exercise-induced muscle damage
is related to sarcomere rupture, in which a reduction in long-term muscle strength can be observed, accompanied by a decrease in the range of motion, inflammatory response, swelling and delayed onset of muscle soreness1-3.
These responses contribute to a decrease in performance observed after a training session or competition, and can be extended for several days3.
Since fatigue and muscle damage can compromise performance, sports professionals in the high-performance dimension have devoted great at-tention to monitoring fatigue and muscle damage during training and competitions. In this context, the external and internal training or competi-tion load has been measured4,5. The external load refers to variables related
to exercise volume and intensity (e.g., number of series and repetitions, distance covered, speed, weight lifted), while the internal load refers to the physiological changes that occur during exercise (e.g., changes in heart rate, availability of substrates, lactate concentration, muscle swelling, etc.)5.
Thus, scales and questionnaires have been identified as valid, simple and low-cost instruments for the monitoring of internal load, being important tools in the daily training and competitions in athletes of different levels and age groups6, since there is a direct relationship between internal load
and training intensity7. Among these instruments, the use of scales to
as-sess muscle pain, general well-being, recovery status, and questionnaires that measure the perception of recovery and stress (RESTQ-Sport) and mood states (Profile of mood states) has been highlighted.
Among the various possibilities of organizing the competitive calendar in collective sports, previous investigations have emphasized the importance of considering competitions with games performed on consecutive days 8-10. It has been shown that this type of competition leads to an increase in
perceived fatigue accompanied by decreased performance in elite athletes9.
Johsnton et al.10 demonstrated an increase in the perceived fatigue and
general muscle pain accompanied by a decrease in physical performance in professional rugby players after three games played in a five-day inter-val. Moreira et al.11, in turn, reported that fatigue accumulated in seven
games performed on consecutive days led to the reduction of testosterone concentration and the compromise of some technical actions in young elite soccer players.
In the context of school sports, children and adolescents frequently participate in sports competitions with games held on consecutive days, with only 24 hours of rest between games8. It should be highlighted that
School soccer competition and recovery status Chaves et al.
performance and increased incidence of infectious diseases and injuries4,5.
However, to our knowledge, no study has evaluated the recovery status of adolescents in school sports competitions. Considering that complete muscle recovery can occur within 48 h after exercise, but may also take more than 7 days3, our hypothesis is that school competition athletes are not
fully recovered for the subsequent game, which may compromise athletic performance. In this sense, it is unknown how much school athletes can recover between games. Assessing this issue will allow physical education teachers and coaches to better detect and understand factors affecting sports performance in school competitions and seek strategies that ac-celerate muscle recovery. In addition, it may assist professionals working with the school competition organization to better plan the schedule of sports competitions in order to increase the interval between competitions and allow adequate time for athlete recovery. Thus, the aim of the present study was to analyze the effect of a school soccer competition with games held on consecutive days in the physical recovery status of U-19 players.
METHODOLOGICAL PROCEDURES
Participants
The number of participants was determined by the GPower software (version 3.1.2; Franz Faul, Universitat Kiel, Germany). The following specifications were taken into account for the calculation of the number of participants: significance level = 0.05; statistical power = 0.8; f effect size
= 0.25; type of test = F test and statistical test = ANOVA with repeated measures12. The number of participants estimated with such specifications
was 24 subjects. A total of 31 male school athletes (17.1 ± 1.1 years, height of 175 ± 6 cm, body mass of 65.2 ± 7.5 kg and body mass index of 21.2 ± 1.9 kg.m-2) of four teams aged 15-19 years were randomly selected.
Vol-unteers were school athletes of the U-19 soccer category, involved in the Regional stage of the Federal Institutions Games, held from September 7 to 11 2016, always in the morning (08:00 a.m. to noon). Volunteers and their parents / guardians signed the informed consent form after being informed of the study objectives and procedures. The study was approved by the Ethics Research Committee of the Federal Institute of Sudeste of Minas Gerais (CAAE: 44608115.6.0000.5588).
Experimental design
session Rate of Perceived Exertion (session-RPE)4. Athletes were familiar
with procedures and instruments used on the day before the competition began. Figure 1 shows the experimental design of the study.
Recovery status
Athletes were asked to indicate their recovery status on the TQR scale13 by
answering the following question: “How do you feel about your recovery now?”13. There was no contact among athletes at the time of response. This
scale has values from “6”, no recovery, to “20”, full recovery.
Delayed muscle soreness
Delayed muscle soreness was determined by using a 100 mm visual ana-logue scale with “no pain” representing 0 mm and “much pain” represent-ing 100 mm14. Athletes reported hamstring pain after performing two
counter-movement vertical jumps during the counter-movement vertical jump test. They were instructed to place their hands on the hips, jumping as high as possible with a range of motion self-determined15.
Internal game load
The internal game load was calculated according to the session Rate of Perceived Exertion (session-RPE) method proposed by Foster et al.4.
Between 5 and 10 min after each game, 16 athletes were instructed to perform an overall assessment of the effort made in the game based on the CR-10 subjective effort scale, responding the following question: “How intense was the game?” Numbers from 0 (rest) to 10 (maximum effort) were used to quantify the game effort. Subjects reported the number verbally, without any contact between them, which quantified how difficult the game effort was perceived4. The internal game load was calculated by the
product between the session-RPE and the total game time in minutes4.
In addition, monotony was calculated by the ratio between the mean and the standard deviation of the internal load of each game4.
Statistical analysis
Data from the 31 subjects are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Data normality was evaluated by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Considering that TQR, session-RPE, internal load and muscle pain data did not present normal distribution, Friedman’s non-parametric test was used to analyze
School soccer competition and recovery status Chaves et al.
these variables. Spearman correlation was used to define the relationship between session-RPE and TQR. The significance level was set at P <0.05. Data were analyzed using the SigmaPlot for Windows software (version 11.0, Systat Software Inc., Germany). In addition, the Cohen’s D effect was calculated and the D values obtained were used to define the size effect as trivial (D < 0.09), small (0.1 < D < 0.24), medium (0.25 < D < 0.39) and large (D > 0.4)17.
RESULTS
TQR was higher before the first game compared to the other games (χ2 = 21.4, p <0.001, D = 0.45) (Figure 2). There was no difference in TQR among the other games (p> 0.05). Figure 3 shows that muscle pain in-creased after the first game and did not return to baseline values before the fourth game (χ2 = 50.9, p <0.001, D = 0.46). Session-RPE and the internal load of the fourth game were larger than those of the other games (χ2 = 39.1, p <0.001, D = 0.42; and χ2 = 47.0, p <0.001, D = 0.68, respectively) (Table 1). There was no correlation between internal game load and TQR (p> 0.05). In addition, monotony from the first to the fourth game was of 3.1 ± 2.0 AU.
Figure 2. Total quality recovery before each soccer game. AU, arbitrary unity. (*) p <0.05, lower
1st game 2nd game 3rd game 4th game
Session-RPE (AU)
5.4 ± 2.0 6.2 ± 1.8 4.9 ± 2.2 7.3 ± 2.6* [4.7; 6.1] [5.6; 6.8] [4.1; 5.7] [6.4; 8.2]
Internal load (AU)
312 ± 145 366 ± 158 293 ± 153 618 ± 247* [262; 362] [312. 421] [239; 346] [530; 705]
Note. Session-RPE; session rate of perceived exertion. AU, arbitrary unity. (*) p <0.05, greater than the 1st, 2nd and 3rd games.
DISCUSSION
The main aim of a coach of a team of collective sports modalities like soc-cer is to maximize the performance of athletes, increasing the chances of victory. In this sense, evaluating the physical recovery state and muscle pain is an important aspect in sports training, since there is a direct relationship between these factors and the training intensity or a soccer game7. Thus,
the aim of the present study was to evaluate the muscle recovery in a U-19 school soccer competition with recovery interval of 24 h between games. The initial hypothesis was confirmed, since reduced perception of the re-covery status associated to increased muscle pain after the first game was observed. Games held on consecutive days resulted in a large effect size on all variables evaluated, which together with the monotony found (3.1 ± 2.0 AU) suggests that the recovery period proposed was not adequate. Periods of high loads and monotony above 2 AU can cause a drop in performance, an increase in the incidence of infectious diseases and injuries4,5.
Soccer is considered a high-intensity intermittent activity character-ized by: a) short-duration and high-speed runs with or without change of direction; b) jumps; c) heading; d) challenges for the ball; and e) other activities, such as low-speed running and walking18. The intensity of a
soccer game is about 75% of maximal aerobic capacity, with most of the game being performed in zones of anaerobic intensity18. Consequently, the
high intensity of the various actions that occur in soccer can result in both the onset of fatigue and muscle damage8,19. However, it is unlikely that the
fatigue process influences the recovery status and muscle pain reported by athletes evaluated in the present study, since fatigue is considered as a physi-ological process that leads to a transient decrease in sports performance, lasting minutes or hours1.
On the other hand, muscle damage is characterized by structural changes in sarcomeres that initiate an inflammatory response and sub-sequent reduction of muscle strength and recovery perception, onset of swelling and delayed onset of muscle soreness1,3. This process can be
recov-ered within 48 h, as it can also remain present for more than seven days3.
School soccer competition and recovery status Chaves et al.
a transient systemic imbalance that results in muscle damage and changes in inflammatory and performance variables20. Rowsell et al.19 evaluated
youth soccer athletes before and after four soccer games held on consecu-tive days. The authors observed a reduction in the distance covered at high intensity and in the total distance traveled. Another study showed a drop in performance in counter-movement jumping, in crouching jumps and in the recovery perception over four consecutive days of indoor soccer games 8. In
another modality, a reduction in the number of sprints in hockey athletes over three games held on four days has also been reported21.
Regarding the recovery perception, the findings of the present study corroborate those of Freitas et al.8, since a decrease in the score of the stress
and recovery questionnaire (physical aspect- RESTQ-Sport) in adult ath-letes after an indoor soccer competition held on four consecutive days was observed. In addition, an increase in the lesion-related score was reported. Similar findings were reported in adult rugby, triathlon and swimming athletes22-24. Taken together, these findings suggest that competitions with
games on consecutive days may promote an accumulation of stressors that leads to reduced recovery status in athletes of different age groups (young and adult) and performance levels (professional, amateur and youth).
Although worsening of recovery and muscular pain has been found, it is not possible to state that the physical performance of athletes during games was impaired. Internal load data suggest that the physical performance in games was not hampered by consecutive games. The lack of correlation between internal game load and TQR reinforces this hypothesis. As this is the first study to assess internal load during a school soccer competition with a 24 h interval between games, the results found cannot be compared to other studies. Although session-RPE has been widely accepted as a valid parameter for assessing the physiological stress of a training session or competition4,25,26, there are few studies that have evaluated this variable
in a game situation25,26. Previous studies have shown that exercise intensity
affects this variable27,28, which suggests that the effort intensity of players in
the fourth game was higher than in other games. The possible explanation for this result may be related to the competition format, since the fourth game represents the semifinals, which in theory, indicates that more im-portant games represent higher stress stimulus, and consequently higher session-RPE. The findings of Moreira et al.29 support this hypothesis. In
this study, it was shown that basketball players presented higher session-RPE, cortisol concentration and lower immunoglobolin A concentration after a championship final, compared to a game against the same team performed in the regular season.
(e.g., distance covered and heart rate) and environmental conditions would be important in order to confirm both the results of the present study as the hypotheses raised.
CONCLUSION
The soccer championship investigated, with games performed on consecu-tive days, caused a decrease in the perceived recovery and an increase of hamstring muscle pain in U-19 school soccer athletes, as well as an increase in session-RPE. Although the worsening in perceived recovery did not affect the internal game load, these findings can be used by organizers of school competitions and by sports coaches in the elaboration of competition calendars, with longer interval between games or shorter games. Methods that accelerate recovery may also be sought. Future studies are needed to investigate the effects of 24 hour intervals between games on muscle damage and game performance variables in different sports modalities, competitive levels and age categories. In addition, the use of recovery techniques and athletes of other age groups should be evaluated.
COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. This study was funded by the authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was obtained from the local Human Research Ethics Committee - Federal Institute of Sudeste of Minas Gerais, process number: CAAE 65789717.2.0000.5115, and the protocol was written in accordance with standards set by the Declaration of Helsinki.
Authors’ Contributions
S.F.N.C., J.B.F.J., M.S.C., B.M conceived and designed the experiments. G.T., M.S.C., S.F.N.C performed the experiments. D.B.C., D.A.B., P.M.Q.P., S.F.N.C analyzed data. B.M., D.B.C., D.A.B., G.T., J.B.F.J., P.M.Q.P., S.F.N.C contributed with reagents/materials/analysis tools. B.M., D.B.C., D.A.B., G.T., J.B.F.J., M.S.C., P.M.Q.P., S.F.N.C wrote the manuscript.
REFERENCES
School soccer competition and recovery status Chaves et al.
Sports Med 2006;36(9):781-96.
2. Ferreira-Junior JB, Bottaro M, Loenneke JP, Vieira A, Vieira CA, Bemben MG. Could whole-body cryotherapy (below− 100° C) improve muscle recovery from muscle damage? Front Physiol 2014;5:247.
3. Paulsen G, Ramer Mikkelsen U, Raastad T, Peake JM. Leucocytes, cytokines and satellite cells: what role do they play in muscle damage and regeneration following eccentric exercise? Exerc Immunol Rev 2012;18:42-97.
4. Foster C, Florhaug JA, Franklin J, Gottschall L, Hrovatin LA, Parker S, et al. A new approach to monitoring exercise training. J Strength Cond Res 2001;15(1):109-15.
5. De Freitas VH, Miloski B, Bara Filho MG. Monitoramento da carga interna de um período de treinamento em jogadores de voleibol. Rev Bras Educ Fís Esporte 2015;29(1):5-12.
6. Halson SL. Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes. Sports Med 2014;44(2):139-47.
7. Melo ES, de Moura Simim MA, Couto BP, de Mello MT. Métodos Utilizados como Recuperação para Manutenção da Saúde e Desempenho em Atletas Profis-sionais de Futebol. Rev Bras Cienc Saúde 2016;1(1):39-44.
8. Freitas VH, De Souza EA, Oliveira RS, Pereira LA, Nakamura FY. Efeito de quatro dias consecutivos de jogos sobre a potência muscular, estresse e recuperação percebida, em jogadores de futsal. Rev Bras Educ Fís Esporte 2014;28(1):23-30.
9. Carling C, Gregson W, McCall A, Moreira A, Wong DP, Bradley PS. Match running performance during fixture congestion in elite soccer: research issues and future directions. Sports Med 2015;45(5):605-13.
10. Johnston RD, Gibson NV, Twist C, Gabbett TJ, MacNay SA, MacFarlane NG. Physiological responses to an intensified period of rugby league competition. J Strength Cond Res 2013;27(3):643-54.
11. Moreira A, Bradley P, Carling C, Arruda AFS, Spigolon LM, Franciscon C, et al. Effect of a congested match schedule on immune-endocrine responses, technical performance and session-RPE in elite youth soccer players. J Sports Sci 2016;34(24):2255-61.
12. Beck TW. The importance of a priori sample size estimation in strength and conditioning research. J Strength Cond Res 2013;27(8):2323-37.
13. Kenttä G, Hassmén P. Overtraining and recovery. Sports Med 1998;26(1):1-16.
14. Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for meas-urement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8(12):1153-1157.
15. Vieira A, Bottaro M, Ferreira-Junior JB, Vieira C, Cleto VA, Cadore EL, et al. Does whole-body cryotherapy improve vertical jump recovery following a high-intensity exercise bout? Open Access J Sports Med 2015;6:49.
16. Christen J, Foster C, Porcari JP, Mikat RP, La Crosse W. Temporal robustness of the session RPE. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2015;11(8):1088-93.
17. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
18. Coelho DB, Coelho LG, Mortimer LÁF, Hudson ASR, Marins JCB, Soares DD, et al. Energy demand and heart rate evaluation at different phases during a match along an official soccer competition. Rev bras cineantropom desempenho hum 2012;14(4):419-27.
19. Rowsell GJ, Coutts AJ, Reaburn P, Hill-Haas S. Effect of post-match cold-water immersion on subsequent match running performance in junior soccer players during tournament play. Journal of sports sciences 2011;29(1):1-6.
20. Romagnoli M, Sanchis-Gomar F, Alis R, Risso-Ballester J, Bosio A, Graziani RL, et al. Changes in muscle damage, inflammation, and fatigue-related pa-rameters in young elite soccer players after a match. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2016;56(10):1198-205.
tourna-CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Suene Franciele Nunes Chaves IPCA, Av. Dr. José Sebastião da Paixão s/nº
Bairro Lindo Vale - Rio Pomba, MG, Brasil
CEP: 36180-000
E-mail: suene_franciele_nunes@ hotmail.com
J Sports Med 2007;28(02):125-34.
23. Coutts AJ, Reaburn P. Monitoring changes in rugby league players’ perceived stress and recovery during intensified training. Percept Mot Skills 2008;106(3):904-16.
24. González-Boto R, Salguero A, Tuero C, González-Gallego J, Márquez S. Moni-toring the effects of training load changes on stress and recovery in swimmers. J Physiol Biochem 2008;64(1):19-26.
25. Fanchini M, Ferraresi I, Petruolo A, Azzalin A, Ghielmetti R, Schena F, et al. Is a retrospective RPE appropriate in soccer? Response shift and recall bias. Science Med Football 2017;1(1):53-9.
26. Pustina AA, Sato K, Liu C, Kavanaugh AA, Sams ML, Liu J, et al. Establishing a duration standard for the calculation of session rating of perceived exertion in NCAA division I men’s soccer. J Train 2017;6(1):26-30.
27. Seiler KS, Kjerland GØ. Quantifying training intensity distribution in elite en-durance athletes: is there evidence for an “optimal” distribution? Scand J Med Sci Sports 2006;16(1):49-56.
28. Lucia A, Hoyos J, Santalla A, Earnest C, Chicharro JL. Tour de France versus Vuelta a Espana: which is harder? Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35(5):872-8.
29. Moreira A, Freitas CG, Nakamura FY, Drago G, Drago M, Aoki MS. Effect of match importance on salivary cortisol and immunoglobulin A responses in elite young volleyball players. J Strength Cond Res 2013;27(1):202-7.
