Natália Albieri Koritiaki1 , Edson Luis de Azambuja Ribeiro2

(1)

Inﬂuence of environmental factors on ponderal performance and

morphometric characteristics of lambs of different genetic groups from birth

to weaning

Natália Albieri Koritiaki1_{, Edson Luis de Azambuja Ribeiro}2_{, Ivone Yurika Mizubuti}2_{, Leandro} das Dores Ferreira da Silva2_{, Marco Aurélio Alves de Freitas Barbosa}2_{, Valter Harry Bumbieris}

Junior2_{, Filipe Alexandre Boscaro de Castro}1_{, Camila Constantino}1

1_{Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Animal, UEL – Londrina, PR, Brazil.} 2_{Departamento de Zootecnia, UEL – Londrina, PR, Brazil.}

ABSTRACT - The objectives of this work were to evaluate the environmental effects (age of dam, type of birth and sex of lamb) and genetic groups (Hampshire Down and Ile de France, ½ and ¾ Hampshire Down, Ile de France and Suffolk, and ½ Texel) on performance and morphometric characteristics (height, length and heart girth) of lambs; to test regressions to predict live weight of lambs from body measurements; and to describe the growth type of the measurements as function of the weight. Weights and measurements were collected from birth to weaning, every 14 days. For evaluations of performance in relation to environmental effects and genetic groups, only data from birth and from weaning were used; for type of growth all collected data were used. Lambs from younger ewes (2 teeth) presented smaller average for weight at birth, heart girth and height at weaning. Single-birth lambs presented greater averages than twins. Genetic group influenced all traits evaluated, except heart girth at birth and average heart girth gain. Means for birth weight were higher in ¾ Ile de France (3.93±0.16 kg) and lower in ½ Texel lambs (3.04±0.24 kg), and for weaning, they were higher in ½ Texel (14.86±0.87 kg) and lower in Ile de France lambs (11.66±0.83 kg). Year of birth influenced all traits. Heart girth and length showed a negative allometric growth in relation to weight, while between weight and height the relation was positive allometric. The factors that most influenced the performance of lambs from birth to weaning are the type of birth, genetic group and year of birth. Correlations between body weight and morphometric measurements are significant, so it is possible to predict one from the other.

Key Words: allometric growth, body morphometry, body weight, sheep

Introduction

Sheep farming has been developing in Brazil, mainly due to the growth of production and consumption of high-quality sheep meat (Souza, 2008), which is considered an attractive source of income to farmers.

In order to be a viable economical activity, sheep farming needs to provide the lambs with conditions to externalize the most of their genetic potential. Therefore, it is important to know the components that affect the proper development of the animals and consequently their production (Landim et al., 2007).

The factors that may inﬂuence the development of lambs in the pre-weaning period are the year and type of birth, sex of the lamb, quantity and quality of the feed available to the ewe during the periods of pregnancy and lactation and the maternal effects (Rashidi et al., 2008).

Morphometric measurements are easily obtained, and have been used to evaluate performance, to characterize genetic groups and as a way of selection for animal breeding (Sowand & Sobola, 2008). According to Araújo

Filho et al. (2007), the phenotypic characterization of a particular genetic group is important for an animal breeding process and can be accomplished through morphometric measurements.

The development of morphometric measurements can be better assessed by allometric equations, which compare the growth of body parts with the total growth, determining whether they present a differential growth or not. According to Carvalho et al. (2007), body parts do not grow at the same speed as the total mass, causing changes in the shapes, anatomical structures, body composition, and consequently in the development of the animals.

The objective of this study was to investigate the inﬂuence of the year of birth, type of birth, sex of the offspring, genetic group and age of dam at lambing in relation to the weight and morphometric characteristics of the lambs at birth and at weaning (70 days of age); to test linear and allometric regressions to predict live weight by means of the morphometric measurements; and to describe the type of growth of the body measurements within the study period.

ISSN 1806-9290

www.sbz.org.br R. Bras. Zootec., v.42, n.7, p.463-470, 2013

(2)

Material and Methods

The data came from the sheep-raising sector of Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL). The experimental unit is located at latitude and longitude 23° 23' S and 51° 11' W, respectively. The analized data came from records of the herd of sheep collected throughout seven years, from 1996 to 2002.

Data from 337 lambs of different genetic groups were analized. Lambs were purebred and crossbred Hampshire Down (HD) and Ile de France (IF) (½ HD and ¾ HD, ½ IF and ¾ IF), crossbred Suffolk (SUF) (½ SUF and ¾ SUF) and Texel (TEX) (½ TEX). Crossbred lambs were offspring of ewes without deﬁned breed.

The evaluated ewes and lambs were kept on a Coastcross

(Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.) pasture, with mineralized salt

available in suitable troughs, receiving supplementation of sorghum silage and concentrate based on corn and soybean meal during winter periods. The sanitary management was performed as usual on the property, and parasite control was carried out according to results of faecal examination. Lambs were weaned at 70 days of age.

Only weights and morphometric measurements taken at birth and at weaning were used to evaluate effects of environment and genetic groups. To determine the type of growth (allometric or isometric) of heart girth, body length and height compared with body weight, we used measurements taken from birth to weaning every 14 days, totalling six measurements per feature.

Morphometric measurements were performed with the help of a tape measure, with the animal standing correctly on its feet and legs, in agreement with the methodology described by Costa Júnior et al. (2006). The following morphometric measurements were recorded: height, measured between the highest point of the interscapular region (withers) and the ground; body length, measured from wither to the tail insertion; and heart girth, measured on the external circumference of the thoracic cavity, on the axillae.

The studied traits were subjected to an analysis of variance, using the GLM procedure of the computer system SAS (Statistical Analysis System, version 8.2), taking as independent variables the genetic group, type of birth (single or twin), sex of the lamb (male or female), age of dam at lambing (two, four, six or eight permanent incisors) and year of birth of the lamb.

Interactions between the independent variables were not considered in the ﬁnal analysis because they did not present signiﬁcance (P>0.05). Averages for genetic group, age of dam at lambing and year of birth were compared

by the Tukey test and the others by the F test. The linear model used for the analysis of weights and morphometric measurements was:

Y_ijklm= µ + I_i + S_j + G_k + T_l + A_m + ε_ijklm

in which Y_ijklm= dependent variables (weights or body measurements); µ = overall mean; I_i= effect of the age of the dam at lambing, where I = two, four, six or eight teeth;

S_j= effect of the sex of the lamb, where j = male or female;

G_k = effect of the genetic group, where k = HD, ½ HD, ¾ HD, IF, ½ IF, ¾ IF, ½ SUF, ¾ SUF or ½ TEX; T_l= effect of the type of birth, where l = single or twin; A_m= effect of the year of birth of the lamb, where m = 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 or 2002; ε_ijklm= random error associated with each observation.

Linear and allometric regressions were tested to predict live weight of lambs from body measurements from birth to weaning by the REG procedure of SAS. In the multiple linear regression equations, using more than one feature to predict the weight, the gradual elimination procedure REG stepwise of SAS was used. The following models were used:

- Y= a + bX (Linear)

- Y= a + b1X1 + ... + bnXn (Multiple linear)

- Y= aXb_(Allometric)

in which Y = live weight; a = intercept; X = morphometric measurements; b = regression coefﬁcient of Y on X; n = number of morphometric measurements. The adhesion of the model was evaluated throught the coefﬁcient of determination (R2_{) of the equations.}

To determine the type of growth of the morphometric measurements, an allometric equation “Y = aXb_{” of Huxley}

(1932) was used, by means of the logarithmic transformation in a simple linear regression: “lnY=lna+b(lnX)”, where “Y” was considered the weight of the animal; “X”, the size of the body parts of the animal; “a”, the interception of the logarithm of the linear regression of “Y” (antilogarithm of “a”); and “b”, the relative growth coefﬁcient, or the allometric coefﬁcient, which is the growth relative speed of “Y” related to “X”.

(3)

Results and Discution

Age of the dam at lambing inﬂuenced weight at birth, heart girth, height at weaning and average daily height gain (P<0.05), in which lambs from young ewes (two teeth) presented lower means (Table 1).

According to Souza et al. (2003) young growing females produce lighter offspring, due to less development of reproductive organs and minor irrigation in the uterus, with possible competition between the dam and fetus for nutrients. Furthermore, ewes at up to three years of age, because of reduced milk production, compromise the ponderal performance of lambs until weaning (Ribeiro et al., 2008; Mohammadi et al., 2010).

Lambs born from single births presented higher averages than the twin-birth lambs for all the evaluated traits (P<0.05), weights and morphometric measurements from birth to weaning (Table 2).

According to Barros et al. (2005) and Santello (2008), twins present lighter weights at birth because of

an intra-uterine competition. Lighter weights at weaning are probably due to the availability of milk, as the dams which give birth to twins produce higher quantity of milk, although they do not reach twice as much the production (Santello, 2008).

There was no effect of sex on the evaluated traits (P>0.05), except for height at weaning, in which males were higher than females (P<0.05) (Table 2). These results agree with those obtained by Moura Filho et al. (2005) and Rocha et al. (2009), who did not ﬁnd any differences between weight of males and females at weaning.

The lack of sexual dimorphism may be related to the age of the evaluated animals. Costa Júnior et al. (2006) reported that the differences between males and females increase as the lambs reach maturity. However, Rashidi et al. (2008) and Mohammadi et al. (2010) reported that males are heavier than females during the pre-weaning period.

Year of birth inﬂuenced all traits evaluated from birth to weaning (P<0.05) (Table 3). Several studies reported that the year of birth is an important source of variation, which

Table 1 - Body measurements from birth to weaning, according to the age of dam at lambing

Traits Age of dam at lambing (number of teeth)

Two Four Six Eight

Number of observations 54 45 37 90

Weight at birth, kg 2.80±0.14b 3.11±0.14ab 3.20±0.15a 3.23±0.10a Weight at weaning, kg 12.53±0.48 13.94±0.52 14.16±0.53 13.26±0.36

Weight gain, kg/day 0.14±0.01 0.15±0.01 0.16±0.01 0.14±0.00

Heart girth at birth, cm 33.78±0.54 34.05±0.58 34.72±0.59 34.79±0.41 Heart girth at weaning, cm 56.59±0.88b 58.82±0.94ab 59.92±0.96a 57.89±0.65ab Heart girth gain, cm/day 0.33±0.01 0.35±0.01 0.36±0.01 0.33±0.01 Length at birth, cm 25.91±0.40 26.44±0.43 26.90±0.44 26.61±0.30 Length at weaning, cm 45.15±0.55 46.63±0.59 46.82±0.61 45.85±0.41

Length gain, cm/day 0.27±0.01 0.29±0.01 0.28±0.01 0.27±0.01

Height at birth, cm 33.44±0.53 34.57±0.56 34.03±0.58 34.35±0.40 Height at weaning, cm 47.40±0.55b 48.76±0.59a 50.03±0.61a 49.00±0.42a Height gain, cm/day 0.20±0.01b 0.20±0.01b 0.23±0.01a 0.21±0.01ab

Means followed by different letters in the row differ signiﬁcantly (P<0.05).

Table 2 - Body measurements from birth to weaning, according to the type of birth and sex of lamb

Traits Type of birth Sex of lamb

Single Twin Female Male

Weight at birth, kg 3.53±0.15a 2.65±0.20b 3.01±0.10 3.17±0.10 Weight at weaning, kg 15.87±0.32a 11.07±0.42b 13.28±0.34 13.67±0.35 Weight gain, kg/day 0.18±0.00a 0.12±0.01b 0.15±0.00 0.15±0.00 Heart girth at birth, cm 35.38±0.36a 33.29±0.47b 34.15±0.39 34.52±0.40 Heart girth at weaning, cm 61.84±0.35a 54.77±0.77b 58.14±0.63 58.47±0.64 Heart girth gain, cm/day 0.38±0.01a 0.31±0.01b 0.34±0.01 0.34±0.01 Length at birth, cm 27.44±0.27a 25.50±0.35b 26.29±0.29 26.64±0.30 Length at weaning, cm 48.30±0.37a 43.92±0.48b 46.13±0.39 46.10±0.40 Length gain, cm/day 0.30±0.01a 0.26±0.01b 0.28±0.01 0.28±0.01 Height at birth, cm 34.80±0.35a 33.40±0.46b 33.75±0.38 34.45±0.39 Height at weaning, cm 51.61±0.37a 45.98±0.48b 48.14±0.39a 49.45±0.41b Height gain, cm/day 0.24±0.01a 0.18±0.01b 0.21±0.01 0.21±0.01

(4)

occurs by several factors, such as climate (temperature, rainfall, humidity, etc.), management practices and quality and quantity of the available feed for the animals (Silva et al., 2008; Mohammadi et al., 2010).

Weights and morphometric measurements were inﬂuenced by genetic group (P<0.05) (Tables 4 and 5). The ¾ Ile de France (3.93±0.16 kg) and ¾ Hampshire Down (3.86±0.16 kg) lambs showed the highest weight values at birth. Three-quarter lambs probably have higher maternal heterozygosity attributable to the use of crossbred females, which may provide an improvement in the intrauterine environment and consequently higher weights at birth. Leymaster (2002) and Barbosa Neto (2008) reported the existence of maternal heterosis on weight at birth of small ruminants.

Weight at weaning and average daily weight gains until weaning varied from 11.66±0.83 and 0.13±0.01 kg in pure Ile de France lambs to 14.86±0.87 and 0.17±0.01 kg in ½ Texel lambs. Ribeiro et al. (2008) found differences among the genetic groups Ile de France, Suffolk and Hampshire Down for weight at weaning and for average daily weight gain until weaning.

Differences in heart girth were signiﬁcant (P<0.05) among the studied genetic groups only at weaning, in which the ½ Texel animals presented the highest average (61.56±1.57). Lambs that had Sulffolk in their composition presented the highest length and height from birth to weaning. These results were expected and are probably due to the additive effects of the Texel breed, which is known to have greater heart girth, and the Suffolk, which have greater body lengths and heights.

Table 3 - Body measurements from birth to weaning, according to the year of birth

Traits Year of birth

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Number of observations 8 28 49 60 73 60 59

WB (kg) 2.28±0.35c 2.86±0.18bc 2.89±0.16bc 3.04±0.17bc 3.10±0.13b 3.79±0.15a 3.66±0.15a WW (kg) 15.67±0.26a 14.12±0.65a 11.58±0.58b 11.87±0.59b 10.88±0.48b 15.45±0.54a 14.75±0.44a WG (kg/day) 0.19±0.02a 0.16±0.01a 0.12±0.01b 0.13±0.01b 0.11±0.01b 0.17±0.01a 0.16±0.01a HGB (cm) 31.78±1.40c 33.90±0.72bc 33.81±0.65c 34.48±0.66bc 33.53±0.54c 37.26±0.60a 35.60±0.49b HGW (cm) 61.34±2.28ab 61.08±1.17ab 55.67±1.05cd 56.29±1.08bcd 54.10±0.87d 62.12±0.98a 57.54±0.80bc HGG (cm/day) 0.42±0.03a 0.39±0.02ab 0.31±0.01c 0.31±0.01c 0.29±0.01c 0.36±0.01b 0.31±0.01c LB (cm) 23.61±1.05c 25.51±0.54bc 26.06±0.48b 26.25±0.50b 26.54±0.40b 29.06±0.45a 28.22±0.37a LW (cm) 49.12±1.43a 44.43±0.74b 44.52±0.66b 43.66±0.68c 44.05±0.55b 48.68±0.61a 48.33±0.50a LG (cm/day) 0.36±0.01a 0.27±0.01bc 0.26±0.01bc 0.25±0.01c 0.25±0.01c 0.28±0.01b 0.29±0.01b HB (cm) 32.62±1.37b 32.66±0.71b 33.23±0.63b 34.08±0.65b 34.03±0.52b 36.40±0.59a 35.68±0.48a HW (cm) 49.40±1.44abc 49.35±0.74bc 46.21±0.66d 47.66±0.68cd 46.97±0.55cd 51.61±0.61a 50.37±0.50ab HG (cm/day) 0.24±0.02a 0.24±0.01a 0.19±0.01c 0.19±0.01bc 0.18±0.01c 0.22±0.01a 0.20±0.01ab

WB, HGB, LB, HB - weight, heart girth, length and height at birth; WW, HGW, LW, HW - weight, heart girth, length and height at weaning; WG, HGG, LG, HG - average daily weight, heart girth, length and height gains, respectively.

Table 4 - Body measurements from birth to weaning, according to the genetic group

Traits Genetic group

Hampshire Down 1/2 Hampshire Down 3/4 Hampshire Down Ile de France 1/2 Ile de France

Number of observations 92 27 55 15 50

Weight at birth, kg 3.33±0.15d 3.13±0.20d 3.86±0.16a 3.54±0.23c 3.19±0.15d Weight at weaning, kg 13.71±0.52ab 13.48±0.72abc 11.89±0.59c 11.66±0.83c 14.29±0.54a Weight gain, kg/day 0.15±0.01ab 0.15±0.01ab 0.13±0.01b 0.13±0.01b 0.16±0.01a Heart girth at birth, cm 34.40±0.59 34.40±0.80 34.60±0.66 32.55±0.92 34.42±0.60 Heart girth at weaning, cm 58.21±0.95abc 59.07±1.30abc 56.40±1.07c 55.01±1.50c 58.69±0.98abc Heart girth gain, cm/day 0.34±0.01 0.35±0.01 0.31±0.01 0.32±0.02 0.35±0.01

3/4 Ile de France 1/2 Suffolk 3/4 Suffolk 1/2 Texel

Weight at birth, kg 3.93±0.16a 3.63±0.20b 3.13±0.25d 3.04±0.24d Weight at weaning, kg 12.55±0.55bc 14.15±0.72a 14.67±0.90a 14.86±0.87a Weight gain, kg/day 0.13±0.01b 0.15±0.01ab 0.16±0.01a 0.17±0.01a Heart girth at birth, cm 34.16±0.62 35.54±0.81 34.35±1.00 34.71±0.97 Heart girth at weaning, cm 56.45±1.01bc 60.10±1.31a 59.25±1.63ab 61.56±1.57a Heart girth gain, cm/day 0.32±0.01 0.35±0.02 0.36±0.02 0.38±0.02

(5)

Phenotypical correlations were analyzed between the evaluated traits within each genetic group; however, since they were similar to each other, they were represented by general correlations including all the genetic groups (Table 6). The correlations between all variables were positive and highly signiﬁcant (P<0.01).

The knowledge of the conformation of the individuals that constitute each genetic group contributes to the establishment of the link between conformation and functionality of the animal (Araujo Filho et al., 2007). Therefore, further studies should be conducted in order to characterize the genetic groups according to the morphometric measurements.

The morphometric measurement that presented the highest correlations with the body weight was heart girth, which occurred at birth (0.76) and at weaning (0.85) (Table 6). Considering that the body of lambs has a similar shape to a cylinder, this result was expected because heart girth, along with body length, is directly related to the body volume, so it is expected that the higher the volume, the higher the weight and vice versa.

Average daily weight gain presented the highest correlations with measurements at weaning, especially with weight at weaning (0.98). These results agree with those of Costa Júnior et al. (2006), Fajemilehin & Salako (2008) and Sowand & Sobola (2008).

According to Fajemilehin & Salako (2008) due to the high correlations between weights and morphometric measurements, it is possible to predict one from another through regression equations. Three types of regression equations were tested in this study: simple linear (Table 7), multiple linear (Table 8) and allometric (Table 7), in order to determine which equation and which body measurement is more efﬁcient to estimate weights from birth to weaning.

According to the coefﬁcients of determination (R²) of the regression equations (Table 7), the simple linear showed to be a little better than the allometric ones to predict weights at birth and at weaning with most of the morphometric measurements. These results differed from those obtained by Sowand & Sobola (2008); however, these differences may be related to the ages of the evaluated animals. In

Table 5 - Length and height at birth and at weaning, and average daily gain for these traits from birth to weaning, according to the genetic group

Hampshire Down 1/2 Hampshire Down 3/4 Hampshire Down Ile de France 1/2 Ile de France

Number of observations 92 27 55 15 50

Length at birth, cm 28.27±0.60a 27.72±0.75ab 25.89±0.72cd 27.02±0.44abc 26.28±0.60bcd Length at weaning, cm 48.34±0.82ab 49.41±1.03a 45.72±0.99cd 46.38±0.60c 45.90±0.82cd Length gain, cm/day 0.29±0.01abc 0.31±0.02a 0.28±0.02abcd 0.28±0.01abcd 0.28±0.01abcd Height at birth, cm 36.16±0.79a 34.47±0.98ab 33.86±0.95bc 34.48±0.57ab 33.98±0.78bc Height at weaning, cm 51.52±0.82a 52.18±1.03a 49.53±0.99ab 48.51±0.60b 47.99±0.82bc Height gain, cm/day 0.22±0.01ab 0.25±0.01a 0.22±0.01ab 0.20±0.01bcd 0.20±0.01bcd

3/4 Ile de France 1/2 Suffolk 3/4 Suffolk 1/2 Texel

Length at birth, cm 25.99±0.49cd 25.21±0.69d 25.97±0.45cd 25.83±0.46d Length at weaning, cm 45.12±0.67cd 43.55±0.94d 46.82±0.62bc 43.78±0.63d Length gain, cm/day 0.27±0.01bcd 0.26±0.01cd 0.30±0.01ab 0.26±0.01d Height at birth, cm 33.77±0.64bc 31.80±0.90c 34.09±0.60b 34.30±0.59b Height at weaning, cm 46.54±0.67c 47.05±0.95bc 48.04±0.62bc 47.80±0.63bc Height gain, cm/day 0.18±0.01d 0.22±0.01abc 0.20±0.01bcd 0.19±0.01cd

Table 6 - Phenotypic correlations between body measurements and weights of lambs at birth and weaning

WW LB LW HGB HGW HB HW WG

WB 0.61** 0.76** 0.54** 0.76** 0.51** 0.76** 0.67** 0.42**

WW - 0.45** 0.83** 0.49** 0.85** 0.44** 0.83** 0.98**

LB - - 0.50** 0.68** 0.38** 0.64** 0.58** 0.31**

LW - - - 0.39** 0.72** 0.42** 0.76** 0.80**

HGB - - - - 0.54** 0.70** 0.56** 0.35**

HGW - - - 0.37** 0.70** 0.83**

HB - - - 0.59** 0.29**

HW - - - 0.76**

WG - average daily weight gain; WB, HGB, LB, HB - weight, heart girth, length and height at birth; WW, HGW, LW, HW - weight, heart girth, length and height at weaning, respectively.

(6)

this study, the animals were very young and probably with constant growth rates, while in the work of Sowand & Sobola (2008), the evaluation period was longer and the age of the animals ranged between 13 and 16 months.

Morphometric measurements at birth partly explained the live weight at birth and were not successful in predicting the live weight at weaning. However, measurements at weaning explained well the live weight at weaning. The most efﬁcient morphometric measurement to estimate the weight, i.e., the one that presented the best coefﬁcients of determination (R²) was the heart girth, for showing high correlations with weight.

The multiple linear regressions (Table 8) showed better coefﬁcients of determination than the simple linear

regressions, meaning that equations using more than one morphometric measurement are more efﬁcient to estimate live weight than equations using only one measurement, which agrees with results obtained by Reis et al. (2008) and Sowand & Sobola (2008). In the same way of what was observed in the correlations, equations for prediction of weight at weaning are better when using morphometric data of weaning.

According to these results, it is possible to use the multiple equations to estimate live weight of the animals in the absence of a scale, especially at weaning.

According to Carvalho et al. (2007) the allometry or isometry enables an appropriate quantitative description of the growth of regions in relation to the body as a whole.

Table 7 - Parameters of linear and allometric regressions to estimate live weight from body measurements of lambs at birth and at weaning

Measurements Intercept Regression coefﬁcient Coefﬁcient of determination _(R2₎ Standard deviation

Linear regression parameters to estimate live weight at birth

Heart girth at birth, cm -3.70194 0.20335 0.57 0.84

Length at birth, cm -3.59246 0.25850 0.58 0.84

Height at birth, cm -4.32008 0.22271 0.58 0.84

Linear regression parameters to estimate live weight at weaning

Heart girth at birth, cm -4.88814 0.53935 0.24 3.06

Heart girth at weaning, cm -15.55018 0.50340 0.72 3.60

Length at birth, cm -3.21540 0.63523 0.21 3.02

Length at weaning, cm -20.91476 0.74857 0.69 3.58

Height at birth, cm -4.31877 0.52779 0.19 3.00

Height at weaning, cm -22.77080 0.74466 0.68 3.56

Measurements Antilogarithm “a” Regression coefﬁcient Coefﬁcient of determination _(R2₎ Standard deviation

Allometric regression parameters to estimate live weight at birth

Heart girth at birth, cm 0.00299 1.97351 0.54 0.82

Length at birth, cm 0.00338 2.08803 0.61 0.85

Height at birth, cm 0.00144 2.18294 0.57 0.82

Allometric regression parameters to estimate live weight at weaning

Heart girth at birth, cm 0.17169 1.22901 0.20 3.00

Heart girth at weaning, cm 0.00295 2.07203 0.68 3.55

Length at birth, cm 0.29865 1.15650 0.18 2.99

Length at weaning, cm 0.00098 2.48237 0.65 3.58

Height at birth, cm 0.17919 1.21968 0.16 2.96

Height at weaning, cm 0.00044 2.65408 0.66 3.60

Table 8 - Multiple linear regressions to estimate live weight from body measurements of lambs at birth and at weaning

Prediction equations Coefﬁcient of determination (R2₎ _{Standard deviation}

WB = -5.6079 + 0.1580LB + 0.1359HB 0.70 0.88

WB = -5.95349 + 0.0748HGB + 0.1202LB + 0.0998HB 0.74 0.88

WW = -7.5494 + 0.3681HGB + 0.3180LB 0.27 3.09

WW = -9.0538 + 0.2972HGB + 0.2625LB + 0.1578HB 0.28 3.10

WW = -24.6584 + 0.3145HGW + 0.4083HW 0.82 3.71

WW = -26.6974 + 0.2495HGW + 0.2700LW + 0.2717HW 0.85 3.74

(7)

In the present study, allometric regression equations were determined to estimate the type of development of the measurements from the body weight.

Equations for each studied genetic group were estimated. However, because they were similar to each other, general equations including all the genetic groups were presented (Table 9), making it possible to conclude that the development of the measurements is independent of the genetic group.

The relation between weight and height showed positive allometric growth (P<0.01) with the regression coefﬁcient (b) equal to 3.47; this result indicates that weight increased proportionally more than the height at the pre-weaning period. The relation between weight and length, and weight and heart girth presented negative allometric growth (P<0.01), with b = 2.52 and b = 2.55, respectively, indicating that the body length and heart girth increased proportionally more than the weight during the study period (Table 9).

Conclusions

It is important to consider the different environmental factors, as they affect the performance of lambs and consequently their production. In the absence of a scale, it is possible to predict the weight according to the morphometric measurements. Weights and body measurements present different (allometric) growth from birth to weaning in all the evaluated genetic groups.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank CNPq (National Council for Scientiﬁc and Technological Development) for granting research productivity fellowships to Edson Luis de Azambuja Ribeiro and Ivone Yurika Mizubuti.

References

ARAÚJO FILHO, J.T.; COSTA, R.G.; FRAGA, A.B. et al. Efeito de dieta e genótipo sobre medidas morfométricas e não constituintes da carcaça de cordeiros deslanados terminados em conﬁnamento.

Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal, v.8, n.4, p.394-404, 2007.

Table 9 - Antilog “a” values (lna), coefﬁcient of allometry (b), coefﬁcient of determination (R²) and type of growth of body measurements in relation to weight in lambs from birth to weaning

Number of observations lna b R2 _{Type of growth}

Length 2578 -7.08489 2.52039 0.91 Negative allometric**

Heart girth 2578 -7.78283 2.54539 0.91 Negative allometric**

Height 2578 -10.95381 3.46785 0.87 Positive allometric**

** P<0.01.

BARBOSA NETO, A.C. Avaliação de cruzamentos de ovinos das raças Dorper, Poll Dorset, Santa Inês e Somalis Brasileira. 2008. 47f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Zootecnia) - Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza.

BARROS, N.N.; VASCONCELOS, V.R.; WANDER, A.E. et al. Eﬁciência bioeconômica de cordeiros F1 Dorper x Santa Inês para produção de carne. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v.40, n.8, p.825-831, 2005.

CARVALHO, P.A.; SANCHEZ, LM.B.; VELHO, J.P. et al. Crescimento alométrico de componentes da carcaça de bezerros de origem leiteira na fase inicial do crescimento pós-natal. Ciência Rural, v.37, n.1, p.223-228, 2007.

COSTA JÚNIOR, G.S.; CAMPELO, J.E.G.; AZEVEDO, D.M.M.R. et al. Caracterização morfométrica de ovinos da raça Santa Inês criados nas microrregiões de Teresina e Campo Maior, Piauí.

Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v.35, n.6, p.2260-2267, 2006. FAJEMILEHIN, O.K.S.; SALAKO, A.E. Body measurement

characteristics of the West African Dwarf (WAD) Goat in deciduous forest zone of Southwestern Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology, v.7, p.2521-2526, 2008.

HUXLEY, J.S. Problems of relative growth. London: Methuen, 1932. 276p.

LANDIM, A.V.; MARIANTE, A.S.; MCMANUS, C. et al. Características quantitativas da carcaça, medidas morfométricas e suas correlações em diferentes genótipos de ovinos. Ciência Animal Brasileira, v.8, n.4, p.665-676, 2007.

LEYMASTER, K.A. Fundamental aspects of crossbreeding of sheep: use of breed diversity to improve efﬁciency of meat production.

Sheep and Goat Research Journal, v.17, n.3, p.50-59, 2002. MOHAMMADI, K.; BEYGI NASSIRI, M.T.; FAYAZI, J. et al.

Investigation of environmental factors inﬂuence on pre-weaning growth traits in Zandi lambs. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, v.9, n.6, p.1011-1014, 2010.

MOURA FILHO, J.; RIBEIRO, E.L.A.; SILVA, L.D.F. et al. Suplementação alimentar de ovelhas no terço ﬁnal da gestação: desempenho de ovelhas e cordeiros até o desmame. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, v.26, n.2, p.257-266, 2005.

RASHIDI, A.; MOKHTARI, M.S.; JAHANSHAHI, A.S. et al. Genetic parameter estimates of pre-weaning growth traits in Kermani sheep. Small Ruminant Research, v.74, p.165-171, 2008. REIS, L.R.; ALBIQUERQUE, F.H.M.A.R.; VALENTE, B.D. et al.

Predição do peso vivo a partir de medidas corporais em animais mestiços Holandês/Gir. Ciência Rural, v.38, n.3, p.778-783, 2008. RIBEIRO, E.L.A.; MIZUBUTI, I.Y.; SILVA, L.D.F. et al. Desempenho

produtivo de ovelhas submetidas a acasalamento no verão ou no outono no Norte do Paraná. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, v.29, n.1, p.229-236, 2008.

ROCHA, L.P.; FRAGA, A.B.; ARAÚJO FILHO, J.T. et al. Desempenho de cordeiros cruzados em Alagoas, Brasil. Archivos de Zootecnia, v.58, n.221, p.145-148, 2009.

ROCHA, M.A.; RIBEIRO, E.L.A.; MIZUBUTI, I.Y. et al. Parâmetros de crescimento e suas correlações em idades entre 60 as 240 dias na carpa húngara (Cyprinos carpio). Semina: Ciências Agrárias, v.23, n.1, p.29-34, 2002.

(8)

SILVA, F.L.; FRAGA, A.B.; ESPÍNDOLA FILHO, A.M. et al. Desempenho de bovinos no Estado de Alagoas. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal, v.9, n.2, p.219-230, 2008. SOUZA, D.A. [2008]. Carne ovina: produção doméstica e

importações 2008. Available at: <http://www.farmpoint.com. br/carne-ovina-producao-domestica-eimportacoes2008_noticia_ 47320_1_2_.aspx> Accessed on: Nov. 20, 2010.

SOUZA, J.E.R.; MARTINS FILHO, R.; OLIVEIRA, S.M.P. et al. Inﬂuência dos fatores de ambiente no desempenho ponderal de bovinos da raça Nelore no Estado do Ceará. Revista Ciência Agronômica, v.34, n.2, p.133-138, 2003.