• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Prediction of Human Vertebral Compressive Strength Using Quantitative Computed Tomography Based Nonlinear Finite Element Method

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "Prediction of Human Vertebral Compressive Strength Using Quantitative Computed Tomography Based Nonlinear Finite Element Method"

Copied!
14
0
0

Texto

(1)

! "#

$ %

&'

(

)

*

$ $

+

, -

., ,

1 2

* 3

"

4

$ % " &

5

1 ! " #

2 -% &

" #

3 -( )* + , % & -" #

4 -/ 0 - 1# % &

" #

5 -/ 0 - 1# % & - 1 ! " #

( ) * +,-%./ 01 2

: 7 / 3 / 87

7 891 2

+ : : 24 / 4 / 87

( ;<

1 :

!" # $ $% % & ' (

)

* + ,

-'!

" . / 0 1 2

-). 3

-# 2

4 % !

5$ 6 +

78 2 9 : %

;% ! # 2

< (.

"2 0 = ,: % 1

.

? @A 1

;% !

-< (. % 1

,: 3

5 2 4

7 7

)$ 7 B $

# 2 - = 0 1 2 /

.

# 3

: C

/ D

-)$

62 6 $F . 2!

42

I 2 %

:

" JKL07

.

! M/

'7N 7)

-( 0 O 1

MATLAB

-P'%% A J 2

Q

R $%Q

% S 8 2 78 2 "

I < (.

( 0 O 1 7) + 2 % 1

ANSYS

6 T % 7

,:Q 2U

--& ( 0 V % ,:Q 2W/

0 1 2

42 1 7)

' = ' %

.

4" 5 : X'

;% $

(. <

,: 3 % 1

%L 0 1 2

Y7 ;%

-K7 1 7

! ' Z 0 1 2 / ' [W : $ 7

7) 0 ) ! )$

1

6 7 7R $

.

6 7 ' 5 8

: " ) .7

" . ). 3 % ! # 2

Q ' /

6 ]) % L! ^ 7D $ 7T %

) ! <

;% < (. % 1 3

,:

5 2 4

7 7

)$ 7 B $

7 $

"J 7$F Q '

' ) %L

.

)

% - ' (/Q'( R=

4

)

-16

%

17

!% ( ' /

-86 : 32 -19 (

) 79 &: 6 : /

-7 -7

- )$ 7 B $

;% <(.

0 1 2- % 1

*

:

:

!

(2)

1 -+ : 1

! " # $ %

-' ( )

* + (

,

- (. ! / ) 0 ( 1

700000

) ( 4 5 6 5 ( $ )

] 1 [ .

8 $ % $ " 9 : ! ; (

< = 0 ) * + > ! 0 4

) ; 20 %

) ; A 9 ) 1 ) )

50 % C (

( ' ( ( 9.D E #)

] 2 [ . F(

< - C ) -:(G %

H - 0 IF %I 1 I( GI JI 0-I 0

5 6 K 6) - 4 , C4 9DE E

L - 0 ) ( ) MN > O P

) E Q C G %

.

R + ! - 4 )S O

4

) ! 1 ) ( ) T O

2

1 U 0

3

$ W O

" #

*X' (

( 1 ) Y W Z !

4

1

%0 U 0

5

( ! .

Z \" ]^ ! $ 19 _ - `4

8 a $

\% b

c! F

- 4

R + ! d

%' ]

( ] 7 -3 [ .

4 9 W" a R Z(

O L%0

e C' ) + C ( )

R + !

) % d 6 O C (

) %( * +

9 W" a ( )

$ % ( f

1- Vertebral body Compressive Fracture (VCF) 2- Plain Radiography

3- Computed Tomography (CT)

4- Dual Energy X-ray Absorbtiometry (DEXA) 5- Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) " #

> !

$ ) ' ! M g 9 J

S ( %( Z ( ) ) %( 1 F( ) MN > )

) ) %W MN > ) 9 W" a (

.

(

% C N0 9 W" a , G ) +

% L ) 0A \()

F A !$ #9

d 6 d N+ ) ! RCN 0 / ) )

( )MN > 4 ! AD E h > ) " \6

) E C 1G6 0) )R Z(

.

1 G6 ! G % F(

C

O A \6 d 6 ] G6) N0 9 W" a )

\

) T

\ O

$ W

" #

, > ! $ (

1

C 0

K 6)

L $ W F

8 - 4 -

) ! . A e C'

\ ) +

! 1

%0 U 0

) \ R + ! - 4 ( ,

> .

! 0 ) ) ) J ! O $ )

%0 U 0 1

A , ) 6 E )

( i E % K 6) ! d ) Z

/ a:( a:(

.

) N0 a

$

d 0 O

A) W T

e C'

i E 0 ) 1 F( )

) J ! / (

" #

1 ! j >

%0 U 0

6

) ) ' ) ) ) J ! ) E 0

\! + d 6 T

G! ,

/ G!

. $

! b

) J ! K 6)

T O ) 4

,

/ G!

: ] a C ( / ( i E f

) J !

Z ( ) / G! T )) ' ) )

(3)

0 4 (9 W 8 ) " !) /S ( > ! W 8

L " l ! 9

T> 1` '

G ' ) /

.

c! 1 9 _ 9 : :+

0

1

A ! ) -( %

1999 ] 8 [ o 0

2

A ! ) -( %

2001 ] 9 [ , Q (

O e C' ) + aE

! \

U 0 1

%0 ) ) / L ) 1

> !

( ! 9 \P

.

A ! )

2003 ) W" a

- 4 )

R + !

(

, %' ]d ,

O ) J !

e C'

1 ! ) ) \ aE ) +

%0 U 0

G 1 9 _

. \ "

3

-( %

(

! 0 () )

J e C' ) + A

d 6 \% )

Z R + ! " \6

/ )

79 / 0 =

2

R ( ] 10 [ .

$ t%

) 0

4

-( %

$ " \6 d 6 \%

R + ! e C'

A ) +

/ Z R + !

() / G!

) 86 / 0 =

2

R ( ] 11 [ .

O ,^ ! $

c! 1

) 0

-( %

j > ! G '

/ : R + ! ) : :

c! ) J ! ) O : ), Z ) :

\ "

) E \ ( -( %

.

,) ' $

$ 1 F( )R

( > ! G aE ] 1`

) O e C' ) +

)b! ( W ) J ! aE

, $ W

R + ! \! + ) aE Z

1- Cody 2- Keyak 3- Liebschner 4- Crawford

% ) 1

%0$ %> =

6

:

/ W6

) ] 11 10 [ .

O ) J ! K :+ $ R Z( u

e C'

\ ) +

! ) )

1 U 0 %0

0 ( 1

( R + !

) / G6)

,) %(

.

F $ %

) $ - `4 ,

O D

e C' ) +

, aE $ >(

O e C'

\ aE ]) +

! ) )

%0 U 0 1

$ 1 F( )

) J ! > ! G aE ]

.

$%8A $ )

$ 1 F( )

. b 8

> ! ) 0 A G ' R

, aE9 T

> ! G Q ( N -( 0 - ) :

A ( Z ( ) ) 1 v +" C (

1 ! )

/ W6

.

2 -> > 0

2 -1

-) ! ) W

) 4 ) 11 T (

) L

%0 ) 2 L (

0X ' !

!$ (

42 A !

0 % b !/ : ! ( t

w ! ( ) 6 P G+ > ! G J 0

L ! ]

j > ! ,

. A T;

T %w

1 ) L ( %(

9 W 8 ) ' R

, ( > !

d_ ; %w

) 1 .

) )

JNE C'

L ) R ( G 4 L%0

' ; 'x L%0 C ( / \ #

( .

(4)

2 -2

-( %-( L 1 T F

\ K :+

!

W \w c

(

C F(

Y 4 *X'

, ( %(

R ( L )

( !

4 d

*/ Y ' N4 YN1

1

G >8 5

% N

1 6

.

$ ) fa: a6

R ( 195 % N

5 J / 210 % N * > ( )

d 1 ( ] 7 [ .

1

!

.

G ' W" a $ )

T L 1

L

! !)

Siemens-64Slices )

kV 140 , mA 80 ,

fa: G >8

1 % N

) W ,

4 d 25 / 0 × 25 / 0 % N (

%

R ( L

) ( ! ( ) )

+

; *

f K2HPO4 " #

f' 50 , 100 200 N R 1

bW ( !

;* L ,

A) W )

* L */

; )

#A) W

( ) J ! ) 1 ) d 2 .( L%0 " #

f'

) ) '

R ( ) ( ! ( ) ,

!)

1- Plexiglas \ " 0

YU! a

$ aE

) ( N J

2

" # > !

j > ! .

2

-# $ % &' ()* $

2 -3

-A % $ ; )

/

( %( + L

/ R + ! Z 1 ( F

%w ,

) Z R GE A %

1 ,

G! 8

.

F $ E 9 W" a y0 ) $

,

( + ( 6 z a!

N !

> ! % !

3

b" 6

) 0

b $

% (

\' 0X z a!

) ] 12 -10 [ .

) d .) A ;$

' O L W" a $

) J ! ( %( ( G A %

:

1

-) Z > ! % ! b" 6z a! _ )

D 0 ( %( ( + ( 6 z a!

+

) %

) % ( %(

(5)

E d_ ; ! E ( % , \( .

+ L $ 0 Z(/

) % ;

J" ) Z L ,G! d d% )

G!. h" E ]

.

2

-( %-( ( + ( 6 z a! 0 ' /

( i E ) 0 > ! % !

: \

,) ( 4 ,G! > !

c

c K a ( %( A %

) ) E W \w ' ) 0 W6

%(, 0 Z

.

3

-d d% L 1b" 6d%

G!

) ( %( ) W ' R i T>

( %( GE ] c ) Z L

) )) '

.

^ ! $

A % / (

; w _ T> !. L ) , ( %(

) d 3 ( .

G6) !.L ) Y ' ) W

E ( 1

0

/ |( A

30 %

$ %0 %0

A

( %( |(

/ 5 J

15 %

( %( 5 J c!

. u

0 $

( %( ( + ( 6 z a! )) ' % ( \'

G! X1 )L !.R }

.

$ D

$ ) 1 $ T> K% !.L ) ~a!

\W / ) ( %( 1 6 F ' b

.

) \W ' a6

A) W \ : !. L )

3 %

a6$

( %( E

G6) C ( /z a!

A % $ ; ( %( OC}"

/

-) 1 N'

.

d 2

W" a $ ) !. L ) ( %( L

) (

.

+%

3

-% . /0 $

$ 1

23 ' 4 % %

d% )

- 4 X1 ) 0

) ; 150 $ ( ,

1 6 !. L ) ) ( %(

0 •J; L ) ) ) EG W6 X1 4

.

, ) )

L ) $ ) ( %(

!.

YU! 1 6

$

!) L $ ) %Z

G )

Model 5500R Instron Corporation,

Canton, MA (

G 1 6

) d 4 .(

, / Y4

/

-~a! + Z ' L A % + L

A % , %Z ( 6

.

A % + Q Z '

,

W" a

R + ! $ W G ' 0

Q (

( R Z(

] 15 -10 [

G! ) E 0 | / ,

.

L ! \ X1 G '$ %

1

G! u W

. $

| / L F

5 / 0

: 6) ) % N

d 0

( L )C(

.

)

, ( %( X1 A w

%Z A % (

c!

1 ;

X

2

L c! C ( / R } !)

S ! - 0

3

) %( b $ 1 ( F+" )

1- Quasi-static Loading 2- Load Cell

(6)

(

-!) dT U 0 L%0 %Z Z '

! .

\ ( a:($ "

R + ! ) %(

1 F( ) ( %( (

.

h" E Z ' 1 ( 0G! 8 ($ 0€

/|( A !. L ) Z ' ,

( 0, 1 ( d0 Z ' \! +

$

A ;

+ ! (

) ( L ) ' ' ( R

.

( ) %(A G% 6$ t%

} d ") Z Z '

R ( G d } $ t% !. L )d

, ( (u w ( %( d 0 w 0 $ L )

) %(G% 6$ X" %() % d 6

( 1 ( )

uX;d 6 ( P ( R + !

.

+%

4

-$ 1

6 / (

2 -4

!

1

T L )

fw :

( ,

C R (c + )

MATLAB

( !/ O ) J ! ,

X1

2

,

G>! G ! '

( > !

u w */ c +

fa: T b $ G 1 9 _

/G! u w */c + CZ 9 T

) d 5 .(

+%

5

-8 98 9 $ !:

; $ #

< = >

2 -5

-# $%&'%

( )

C R ( c + ) (

MATLAB

) 6 0

( ' E G!

T ! '

A ) 0 ) J !

e C'

d0 W !) +

,

d 0 0 ( 1

A) W T

e C'

1 G '/

3

, )

C R ( c +

e C' ) + ANSYS

%( "

. $

) W b

e C'

W d 0 ) W A) W

25 / 0 % N

G >8 C'

e

W T fw : G >8

1 % N

) •J;G '$ ) T G6) Z ( )

.

$ # b 0 G! ) 6$ t% ( $

C' e )

e C'

/ • T ) ) 1 $ (

e C' ,

) W A

e C'

A $ 0 0 " %0

(7)

! ‚! 4 % ! F

- 0 $ t%

9 \! + Z;

G ' ,

.

) )

) : " #

) J ! d 0

" #

R ( ) f'

( )

/ aE a

( ) :

C

d 0 N

) ) O ) J !

\! + , / G!

. d 6 , A e C' ) +

W !

4 ) 1 -11 T (

) (

.

6

-?! @ A: 6! $ % # ()* $

) T11-1 (

2

@ A: D 4 ) . $

25 / 0

H

5 / 0

6

1

J D2%

.

d $ )

e C' ) " #

MN > |( MN >

( ) ) (

.

d $ A T )

, ) W e C' : 6)

N 0 (

W 1 × 25 / 0 × 25 / 0 % N bW

.

b d $ W T )

4 16 ) e C'

( R ]) )

C'

b ) W

1 × 5 / 0 × 5 / 0 1 × 1 × 1

( ) ) d

. " #

e C'

( '

1$

" # e C'

)d

/

\! + .

2 -6

-+ ,- . / , 012 )3 %/ 4

$%&'%

/56 )

2 -6 -1

! "#$ %&

Z c ) J !

) 1 ( ) 2 (

Z J! G

" #

+ G ' )|( A d 0

) 0d \

] 13 [ .

Ez(MPa)=-34.7+3230×BMDQCT(gr/cm3); (1)

(BMDQCT>0.0527)

Ez(MPa)=2980×BMDQCT1.05(gr/cm3); (2)

(BMDQCTH0.0527)

9 \ $ )

Ez

+ |( A

. : 0527 / 0

) 6D d+

9 \ ) 1 ( ) 2 ( .

a ) 1 (

) : " # 0527

/ 0 a ) 2 ( ) :

" # %0 0527 / 0 ) b 8 \% G!

] 13 [ . 4 G\ (

% !

e C'

d: C (

" # /

381 / 0 A % ] 11 [ .

2 -6 -2

!

' %&

($)* +,

1

) :

0 N C(

" #

, J / A) W

G ) (

R ( ,

0 > ! C} #

(8)

$ % ) /

1

) ( % ,

2

X4 ( 0

3

8

( ) $ 4 !. b

F G 1 .

^ ! $

: MPa 0001 / 0

|( A ƒ

5 / 0 G\ (

! 4 e C'

0 # R (

) " # J ()

1 F( )

] 12 -10 [ .

e C'

! 4 •

6

G c

Z J! ) J !

) ) ( R Z( 9 W" a )

0G!

] 12 -10 [ :

1

-! 4 ! P

6 C # (

.

2

-) T % !

d ") ) '

9 6

L J

4

o ( ,

! 4K 6) 1 ( ) 6

6

,

%0 >8 ) 0

3 / 0 % N

, ( .

2 -6 -3

--$ " . /

'

0 1 2 34

!

567 84

d N+ e C' ) +

A aE

( %( W !

)

R } $ 1 F(

L# 0

5

G 1 9 _

. F

( %( J! 1 (

O e C' ) + aE , ~a!

( + A

G ' )

) 1 : +

( 6 ~a!

( /

% N L

Z '$ 4 G%!

. F

N' 1

bN_ ) Z '

6

1 ) W ) W ,

C ( \( ' 9 ' ) ( + ( 6 z a! ) ) '

: ( .

1 (

) 0 f%'

( 1

7

1- Homogenous 2- Isotrope 3- Incompressible 4- Resolution 5- Small Deformations

6- Rigid Displacement and Rotation 7- Nodal Force

) +

( + ~a!

e :" + Z 'A % P ) 0

, ( \! + .

J! e C' ) + ) KFE (

( %(

A % + Z ' 1 ( :

/ ( 6 ~a!

/G!)

.

2 -6 -4

-: +&' 4($ ;$ 4

O ) J ! ( R + ! \! +

e C'

) J ! a , aE) +

] 11 [ :

FLFE = 0.0068KFEH (3)

)

, a $

KFE J! e C' ) + H

A 5 J

e C' ) + .

2 -7

-/ , 012 )3 %/ 4

+ ,- .

$%&'%

/56 8 )

2 -7 -1

! "#$ %&

G ' \! +

+ |( A

e C' c

) 1 ( ) 2 (

\! + G '

N

-L e C'

' C (

" #

/

Z c

) 4 ( ) 5 ( ) J ! :

Iys(MPa)=-0.75+24.9×BMDQCT(gr/cm3); (4)

(BMDQCT>0.06)

Iys(MPa)=37.4×BMDQCT1.39(gr/cm3); (5)

(BMDQCTH0.06)

,9 \ $ )

ys

I

N

. a ) 4 (

) : " # 06

/ 0 ) : 06 / 0

) 6D d+

9 \ ) 4 ( ) 5 ( (

a ) 5 ( ) : " #

%0 06 / 0 ) b 8 \% ]

(9)

( -)

u

I

( L e C' 2 / 1

F( ) / N

-1 ]

14 [ .

(-( 0

) u

J

( % e C' C ( A) W 0145 / 0

1 F( )

] 15 [ .

) : h> Y4

|( A

% ( -( 0 ( - , N - , +

e C'

,

# A aE

1

) ) 0 A

L e C'

) J ! .

d 7

#A L

) ( aE

. b

cE$ "

) J ! C (R )cEb + |( A

a:(9 T >

N )

N -( 0

( a:( ( )

-(-( 0

(

/ G!

.

) J_ C (R !cEb

) 1 F(

G ) ( 0

.

+%

7

-1

-'L! M?! 1

N N+ ) aE ] $ % '

e C'

) 1` ) aE ], ! t 4 ! 0 )) +

)d

c ) J ! K :+ $ ) X" /

, N - 4 L $ ) ' Z

-( 0

Q (-( 0 Q (- , N

)

) G P

( " # ] 15

-13 [

( ) 0 A F aE # ) %( ,

L e C'

) 1 ) J ! A )d

) d 7 .(

0 ' /

" #

L L ) G P / f\

e C'

9 J

2

5 %Z X" ,

e C'

) 9 \

1- Multilinear

2- Densitometric Inhomogenities

) E aE ] ! d0

.

" $ # "

1` / ) 0 ( %(

! ( %" aE ]

) ! \ ( %( W6 c K a ( %( t 4

3

)

3

- 4 N; N; X1 A % 9 _ )

( + , (

+ 9 T ( %( Q Z '

/ G! aE ]

.

2 -7 -2

!

' %&

+, ($)*

O L%0 d N+ )

e C'

d .) C ( aE ] ) +

G% 6 ) 0€

2 -6 -2

Z J! G c ,

( 1` A %

e C'

6 G

) 1 ) J !

. e C'

d N+ ) ,R ( G •

O L%0

e C'

9 _ % C ( aE ] ) +

1 F( )$ % L !. ,) ( %

.

2 -7 -3

-=>? !

' %& @) 5 4

, R ( G > ! G>!G ! 'R

) W ) W

e C'

G R (G ) ) '

9 _ ,G>!

e C'

) ) h > G>! G

%( uX; Z ( )

( .

$ 0 ' /

e C' )

C ( %0 0 ) ) 6 A \( 'c +

+ Z ' ( G+ ( ) / ( ) 6 ,

= Z ( ) ) ) ) d } C ( 0 " %

O / d N+ $ ; A ‚! 4 4 (

e C'

] ) +

( aE

.

C R ( c + ) ( $

MATLAB

/ L%0 0

e C'

• a +

0 / , ( uX;R ( G

e C'

G

(10)

uX; Z J! G )^ \+ > ! C} #R ( ( .

2 -7 -4

-2 34 -$ " . /

A :

!

56 B7 84

d N+ e C' ) +

O aE ] 9 T A

N; N;

} $ 1 F( )

d < C

1

G 1 9 _

.

( 0 ( - 4 X1 A %

, > ! ) d ) ) / ) '

! d0

( + > !

/ d 0 / G! Q Z '

( 1 G! aE ]

#) > ! ! d0 6 0

N )

,

( + ) +8 b }

– Q Z '

) „ !

.

) „ N / ) 0 Q (

,

> ! N

2

…Dw )

.

X1 )

,

( +

% Q Z '

) )

J_ / b

) ( 0

G ; (

3

G! u W

.

R Z( $ ; A % W6 c ! \ F

, ( %( ( - /

( + ~a!

A

G ' )

: +

( 6 ~a!

C ( /

L G+

+ Z '

% N L C

6 $ 4 G%!

G 1 .

d N+ )

L%0 e C'

( C ( aE ] ) +

L%0 d N+

e C'

F , aE ) +

1 N'

)) ' 1 ) W ) W ,bN_ ) Z '

( : \( '9 ' ) ( + ( 6 z a!

. - C

R 1 R 1

~a! A % Z '

( 6 \! +

1 (

4

( ) %(,R 1 )

-Z '

5

1- Large Deformation 2- Yield Load 3- Failure area 4- Reaction Force

L

( %(

/ G!

.

1 (

R 1 )

) 0f%'

( 1

6

) e :" +

( + ~a!

\! + .

R + ! d_ ; ( $

O L%0 - 4

e C'

1 F( )) +

.

2 -8

-/ ,%

# /:% ;

$%&'% )

A Q % ) S O '

MN > e C'

!‚! 4 + Q % : ,) +

" % ( F( X1 c )

c

) W "

e C' MN > ]

12 -10 [ X",

aE d N+ d_ ; ‚! 4 % ! F

) W ) A d N+ , aE ]

e C'

1 × 25 / 0 × 25 / 0 , 1 × 5 / 0 × 5 / 0 1 × 1 × 1 % N bW

A %

( +

J! Q Z '

e C' (/ ) +

: j > !

.

3 -? @%

A ' 1

O L%0 - 4 J! ) : ,

e C' ) +

aE ) KFE (

) W ) A ( %( %

1 × 1 × 1

bW N

- 4 Q (R + ! ) : 0 )

O L%0

e C'

aE) +

) FLFE (

Q (R + !

Z ) Fu ( ( %(

) (

.

(11)

?6!:

1

-! 1 )

( %

N6 / # ! 1 ) # @ A:

'L 6!

) FLFE

(

O 6

Fu(KN) FLFE(KN)

)

mm N

(

KFE ( %(

9 / 4 08

/ 3 22665

1 -11 T

1 / 5 7

/ 3 27391

2 -11 T

5 / 3 8

/ 3 25408

3 -11 T

8 / 6 5

/ 4 31734

2 L

d 8

( ) %( ,

-d N+ d_ ; Z '

e C' ) +

A ) ) W e C' 1 × 25 / 0 × 25 / 0 , 1 × 5 / 0 × 5 / 0

1 × 1 × 1 )

( %(

) 2 -11 T (

) (

.

+%

8

-6

-O :

2 -11 T

#3! A: 6! @

Q 3 2

25 / 0

H

5 / 0

6

1

J

d 9

( ) %(,

-( %-( % Z '

) ) J ! )

K :+ $

Z 9 T

) (

.

,d '

( R + ! 1 ( :

F( ) ( %(

) 1

.

+%

9

-6

-N6 / ! 1 ) O :

@ A: 'L S 6!

A ' 2

L%0 - 4 ( R + ! ) : ,

e C'

aE ] ) +

) FNLFE (

( %( %

0 )

) :

Q (R + !

/

) (

.

?6!:

2

-N6 / ! 1 ) # ( %

@ A: 'L S 6!

O 6

Fu(KN)

FNLFE(KN)

( %(

9 / 4 1

/ 4 1

-11

T

1 / 5 85

/ 4 2

-11

T

3 / 5 12

/ 5 3

-11

T

8 / 6 85

/ 5 2

L

A ' )

3

R + ! ) : ,

L%0 -4 (

O e C'

R + ! , ( %( aE ] aE ) +

: / Z

( (/uD E

G! ) )

(12)

?6!:

3

-( % ! 1 ) <T L

/ N6 @ A: 6 'L 6! 'L S

O %

FNLFE(KN)

FLFE(KN)

( %(

78 / 0 75

/ 1 1

-11

T

28 / 0 34

/ 1 2

-11

T

95 / 0 33

/ 2 3

-11

T

95 / 0 3

/ 2 2

L

4 -> AB C+" @%

\ X1 c G+ ( G W" a $ )

L !

1

A / f\ 1 9 _

e C' ) +

1 6 d N+ ) c $ % G+ C ( ( %(

. X"

) % 0 > ! G L !. i E

X1

z a )

)

F _ ,

. $

) b 8 ,^ !

e C'

( %( A ) d

A N%'

( ) 1H G Pd N+ A w )|(

.

d ) 0 a( %

8

) W # 0 ,) )

e C'

- C \

0 e C'

2

( + ,

-( 1 ) " \6d 6… \a( , N_ ; Z '

1 ( ) : uD E 0

R + ! J!

%0

2 %

‚! 4 % ) ( $ 0

G! /G!

.

S ( W" a $ ) / G! S ( : F

d N+ O d_ ;

e C'

) ) \ aE ) +

O 0 %0 U 0 1 !

) R !

, E " ! )$ ::+ ) J !

Q (R + ! ) :

1- Quasi-Static 2- Mesh Density

/G!

O e C'

) W aE ]) +

$

W" a O

)

1 :

) .

) 0 a( %

A ' 3

) / Q ( R + ! ,G! ) ) (

: ) ' O

O c! ) / R + !

e C'

G! ) E %0 aE , aE ) +

0 ( 1

$ (

O aE

e C'

aE ] ) +

)

,K :+ ( %( Z R + ! ) /

) ; )

10 %

$ (

O aE

e C'

) aE ) +

) ; 32 %

0

, $

.

aE ]O

) / )

R + ! Q (

) ( ( %(

.

d 9

( ,

-Z '

d N+ / G!

e C'

aE ]) +

( %( K :+

) (

. a( %

,G! 4 d $ ) 0

( %(

) aE

R Z( ! u + aEG" ; S YU!

( ) %(

-R $ ) : ( %( % Z '

($ 0, ! ) E : 1 (

( R + !

) 1 F( ) ( %(

.

R + ! C O $ ) J ! $

Q (

( + % : ( %(

-F() ( %( Q Z '

) / G!

.

0 Z(/

O )

e C'

aE ) +

( + j > !

-Q Z '

%( X4

X", %(

C , : a

Q ( R + !

) /G!

.

Z ( )

J! e C' ) +

0 ) ! 8

) J ! Q ( R + ! ) / G '

)

$ 0

() 1 S () / ) aE = 8

] 11 10 [ .

d N+ ) 9 8

C' e

\ aE) +

:

1 (

- 0 ) d_ ; 1

! ) E ( : R % ) +

(13)

% ) + - 0 , )9 \ e C'

)d

A e C'

! (- , ( %() +

.

2

-( R + ! 0 - 4 a \! + )

Z J! G N -( 0 , (

" #

F _ /

: / C

G P ) 0077 / 0 (

F( )

) 1

.

^ ! $ 8 9 :

F =LIuA (6)

0 F

( R + !

Iu

(

-e C' .

0 ' /

Iy = 1.2

Iu

G ( X"

:

F =L1.2IyA (7)

) J ! $ t%

W 2 / 0 % G

- \! +

), N

:

F =L1.2AE (Jy-0.002) (8)

N -( 0c! : C '

) 0077 / 0 ( G

… a ) Z J!

:

F =L0.0068AE (9)

C '

LAE = KH

, a ) /

R + !

( (

O L%0

e C'

aE) +

) 1 6 ) J ! )

] 10 11 [ :

) 10 ( FLFE = 0.0068KFEH

1

/ ) 0

K

L%0 \! + J!

e C'

aE) +

H

A 5 J

e C' ) + .

,^ ! $

O e C'

aE ) +

) J ! d ")

- 4

! ) ! H

R + ! \! + G ') W

, Q (

j > ! Z ( ) ! aE ] d N+ ) 6

( ) %(

-%( / Z '

.

]G ' X"

aE

( > ! G (

, ) J ! O

e C'

aE ]) +

, ;$ )

X4 (* '

.

0 8 ; K :+

$ >(

O 1

e C' ) + ] aE

1 ! ) ) \

%0 U 0

aE L !. ) $ 1 F( )

-L !D4 aE

/ G '

)

) W ) R + !

( %( ) W

L $ W ) 'K , R Z( ,

1 .

t( # ^ ! $

( %( ) W

) 1 / W '

C (

S (

G G!)

%a ) 0 ,

$l

K 6)

L N0 ) / )

/ )

) .

5 -% 0 > ;D2

" G %; K :+ $

C Z

^ G ( )

$ t%

( C4C0 ) T 9 C Z ) J !

G! R Z(

. X"

0 ( ) R . ) E

) E ( ) 6

0 0 $ "

( ) C0

0X

(14)

E 1. Riggs BL, Melton U. The worldwide problemof osteoporosis:Insights afforded by epidemiology, Bone 1995, 17:

505 – 511.

2. Larijani B, Hossein-Nezhad A, Mojtahedi A, Pajouhi M, Bastanhagh MH, Soltani A, Mirfezi SZ, and Dashti R. Normative data of bone mineral density in healthy population of Tehran, Iran: Across sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2005; 6:38.

3. Whealan KM, Kwak SD, Tedrow JR, Inoue K, Snyder BD. Non-invasive imaging predicts failure load of the spine with simulated osteolytic defects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82:1240-51.

4. Singer K, Edmondstone S, Day R, Breidahl P, Price R. Prediction of thoracic and lumbar vertebral body compressive strength: correlations with bone mineral density and vertebral region. Bone 1995; 17: 167-74.

5. Brickmann P, Biggemann M, Hilweg D. Prediction of the compressive strength of human lumbar vertebrae. Spine 1989; 14: 606-10.

6. Edmondson SJ, Singer KP, Day RE, Price RI, Breidahl PD. Ex vivo estimation of thoracolumbar vertebral body compressive strength: the relative contributions of bone densitometry and vertebral morphometry. Osteoporos Int 1997; 7: 142-8.

7. Ebbesen EN, Thomson JS, Beck-Nielson H, Nepper-Rasmussen HJ, Mosekilde L. Vertebral bone density evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorbtiometry and quantitative computed tomography in vitro. Bone 1998; 23: 283-90.

8. Cody DD, Gross GJ, Hou FJ, Spencer HJ, Goldstein SA, Fyhrie DP. Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. J Biomech 1999; 32: 1013-1020.

9. Keyak J.H, Rossi S.A, Jones K.A, Les C.M, Skinner H.B. Prediction of fracture location in the proximal femur using finite element model. Med Eng Phys 2001; 23: 657-664.

10. Liebschner MAK, Kopperdahl DL, Rosenberg WS, Keaveny TM. Finite element modeling of the human thoracolumbar spine. Spine 2003; 28: 559-65.

11. Crawford RP, Cann CE, Keaveny TM. Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography. Bone 2003; 33: 744-50.

12. Buckley JM, Loo K, Motherway J. Comparison of quantitative computed tomography-based measures in predicting vertebral compressive strength. Bone 2007; 40: 767-74.

13. Kopperdahl DL, Morgan EF, Keaveny TM. Quantitative computed tomography estimates of the mechanical properties of human vertebral trabecular bone. J Orthop Res 2002; 20: 801-805.

14. Morgan EF, Keaveny TM. Dependance of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site. J Biomech 2001; 34: 569-77.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Os objetivos específicos incluem: escolher terreno, de três encontrados próximos ao HUST e Policlínica, para a construção de um edifício garagem; definir o tipo do edifício

Com base no ponto 2.2., existem desvantagens na existência de stocks numa empresa, que devem ser geridas, de forma a que possam ser minimizadas. Para tal, existem várias

The indications of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are to the treatment of tumors in the spine bone and the thoracic pain reduction from fractures of the lumbar vertebral bodies

Portugal, em 1999, participou no grupo fundador da União Económica e Monetária Europeia (zona euro), perdendo o instrumento taxa de câmbio. Ao longo de todo o processo de

Iremos mostrar tamb´em que uma variedade completa com curvatura de Ricci assint´oticamente n˜ao negativa que admite alguma desigualdade de Gagliardo-Nirenberg possui m´aximo

Response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN) were used to model the bending strength of gypsum-bonded fiberboard.. According to the hydration

Com a entrada em vigor da Lei nº 12.846/2013, também conhecida como Lei Anticorrupção, que entre os seus principais dispositivos buscam inovar o ordenamento jurídico

Sin embargo, es una posición visible ya, como decíamos, en determinados pasajes de Homero y que se extiende entre la aristocracia del siglo VII (ADRADOS, ibidem). Tendo em vista