• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Imunização ativa contra o virus da Hepatite B com baixas doses da vacina plasma derivada por via intradérmica

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Imunização ativa contra o virus da Hepatite B com baixas doses da vacina plasma derivada por via intradérmica"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texto

(1)

Rev. Inst. Med. trop. São Paulo

31 {2): 91-94, março-abril, 1989

ACTIVE IMMUNIZATION AGAINST HEPATITIS B VIRUS (HBV) WITH LOW-DOSES OF

PLASMA-DERIVED VACCINE BY INTRADERMAL ROUTE

F l a i r J o s é C A R R I L H O (1), M a r i a L ú c i a Q U E I R O Z (2), L u i z C a e t a n o d a S I L V A (1), L u í s E d m u n d o P i n t o d a F O N S E C A (1), C e l s o G R A N A T O ( 3 ) , I s a b e l O B A (3) & L e d a O B A R A (4)

S U M M A R Y

S c h e d u l e for v a c c i n a t i o n a g a i n s t H B V infection has u s u a l l y been based on three

separate injections of 20 meg of the v a c c i n e by i n t r a m u s c u l a r route. O n e of the

m a i n shortcomings to its use in large scale programs has been its h i g h cost. Ninety

out of 300 health workers were s u b m i t t e d to three injections of 2 m c g of p l a s m a

-derived v a c c i n e ( P D V ) by intradermal ( I D ) route on d a y s 0, 30, a n d 180. A n t i - H B s

was detected in 74 (82.2%) after the second dose and in 80 (88.9%) after the third

dose, a non-significant difference. However, levels above 10 times the cut-off were

observed in 29 (32.2%) and 77 (85.5%), respectively (p < 0.001). T h e results showed

that a low-dose schedule is effective when used in health workers and should be

tried with other risk groups.

K E Y W O R D S : H e p a t i t i s B ; H e p a t i t i s B v i r u s ; H e p a t i t i s B vaccine; I m m u n i z a t i o n .

I N T R O D U C T I O N

P l a s m a - d e r i v e d v a c c i n e is v e r y effective

against H B V

1 3 4 8

'

1 5

. T h e protective antibody

against surface antigen ( a n t i - H B s ) develops

af-ter three doses of the v a c c i n e in more t h a n 90%

of the g e n e r a l p o p u l a t i o n

3

. T h e r e c o m e n d e d

schedule in most p r o g r a m s of active i m m u n i

-zation has been three separate injections of 20

meg per dose by i n t r a m u s c u l a r (IM) route in

del-toid region3 4 7 1 5

. One of the m a i n difficulties

to apply this p r o g r a m in underdeveloped

coun-tries is its h i g h cost. F o r this reason different

schedules with lower doses have been tried, s u c h

as 10, 5 and 2.5 meg by i n t r a m u s c u l a r routes2

7. i2, i3 More recently, 2 meg by intradermal ( I D )

route was employed, w i t h p r o m i s i n g results5 8

9, io, i3 However, the samples in most studies were

rather s m a l l .

T h e aim of this s t u d y was to investigate the

efficacy of the plasma-derived vaccine by u s i n g

2 meg by I D route.

M A T E R I A L A N D M E T H O D S

A total of 300 hospital health workers were

submitted to a serological study of H B V mar

(1) C l i n i c a l H e p a t o l o g y B r a n c h , D e p a r t m e n t o f G a s t r o e n t e r o l o g y , F a c u l d a d e d e M e d i c i n a d a U n i v e r s i d a d e d e S ã o P a u l o . S ã o P a u l o , S P , B r a z i l . (2) H o s p i t a l O s v a l d o C r u z . S ã o P a u l o , S P , B r a z i l . (3) H e p a t i t i s B r a n c h , D i v i s i o n o f V i r o l o g y , I n s t i t u t o A d o l f o L u t z . S ã o P a u l o , S P , B r a z i l . (4) B I E S P , I n s t i t u t o P a u l i s t a d e P a t o l o g i a C l í n i c a . S ã o P a u l o , S P , B r a z i l . A d d r e s s f o r c o r r e s p o n d e n c e : D r . F l a i r J o s é C a r r i l h o . C l i n i c a l H e p a t o l o g y B r a n c h , D e p a r t m e n t o f G a s t r o e n t e r o l o g y , F a c u l d a d e d e M e d i c i n a d a U n i v e r s i d a d e d e S ã o P a u l o . A v . D r . A r n a l d o , 4 5 5 . C E P 01246 S ã o P a u l o , S P , B r a z i l .

(2)

kers. H e p a t i t i s B surface antigen ( H B s A g ) and

its antibody ( a n t i - H B s ) a n d total core antibody

( a n t i - H B c ) were studied by using an enzyme-lin­

ked i m m u n o a s s a y ( A U S Z Y M E I I , A U S A B E I A

and C O R Z Y M E , respectively, produced by A B ­

B O T T L A B O R A T O R I E S , U. S . A . ) . T h e sche­

dule of active i m m u n i z a t i o n was similar to that

used by M I L L E R et a l

1 1

: one dose at d a y zero,

and subsequent doses at one and s i x - m o n t h in­

tervals u s i n g 2 meg by I D route. O n l y workers

without H B V m a r k e r s were s u b m i t t e d to v a c c i ­

nation on a voluntary basis.

Seroconversion to a n t i - H B s was studied im­

mediately before and one m o n t h after the third

dose. A rough s e m i q u a n t i t a t i v e determination

was based on the value of the cut-off. I t was con­

sidered a good antibody response when the value

obtained was above then times the cut-off level

8

.

I n the screening of the 300 workers, a n t i - H B c

was detected i n 43 (14.3%), i n c l u d i n g 9 (3.0%)

with H B s A g and 34 (11.3%) of a n t i - H B s ( F i g u r e

1). O n l y 90 (35.0%) out of 257 workers without

H B V m a r k e r s accepted the v a c c i n a t i o n schedu­

le. T h i s group c o n s i s t e d of 68 females a n d 22

males; w i t h a m e a n age of 37.4 ± 8.4 years (22

- 56 years).

R E S U L T S

T h e results showed that, a n t i - H B s was de

tected i n 74 (82.2%

c

) and 80 (88.9%) workers, res­

pectively before and after the third dose, a non­

significant difference (chi-square = 1.1238, 0.30

> p > 0.20, F i g u r e 2). However, a good antibody

response was obtained in only 29 out of 90 (32.2% )

after the second dose a n d in 77 out of 90 (85.5%)

w o r k e r s a f t e r t h e t h i r d d o s e ( c h i - s q u a r e =

50.6909, p < 0.001), as shown in F i g u r e 3.

D I S C U S S I O N

O u r results clearly show t h a t v a c c i n a t i o n

w i t h three doses of 2 meg of H B V plasma-derived

by I D route produces a h i g h number of serocon­

version to a n t i - H B s (88.9%). T h e s e results agree

w i t h those p u b l i s h e d by M I L L E R et a l

1 1

a n d

R E D F I E L D et a l

1 4

. T o our knowledge only few

papers based on s u c h a schedule of i m m u n i z a ­

tion have been published to d a t e

5 9 1 0 1 1 1 4 1 6

.

I t is worth m e n t i o n i n g that the seroconversion

TOTAL A N T I - H B c

( n « 3 0 0 )

Y E S NO 9 0 ( 3 5 . 0 % ) 167(65.0%) F i g . 1 - - F r e q u e n c y o f H B V m a r k e r s i n a s c r e e n i n g o f 300 h o s p i t a l h e a l t h w o r k e r s . [ ] < I O x s CUT-OFF A F T E R T H E A F T E R T H E 2nd D O S E 3 r d D O S E

X

2

- 5 0 . 6 9 0 9 , p < 0 . 0 0 1

F i g . 2 — A n t i H B S r e s p o n s e a f t e r t h e s e c o n d a n d t h i r d d o s e of H B V p l a s m a - d e r i v e d v a c c i n e . N U M B E R O F C A S E S % f j A N T I - H B S ( - ) 180 DAYS 210 DAYS

"X

2

= 1 . 1 2 3 8 , 0 . 3 0 > p > 0 . 2 0

F i g . 3 — F r e q u e n c y o f v a c c i n a t e d p e o p l e w i t h g o o d a n t i b o d y r e s p o n s e a f t e r t h e s e c o n d a n d t h i r d d o s e .

(3)

rate observed in those studies varied from 74.0

to 100.0%. B e s i d e s , a c o m p a r i s o n between 20

meg by I M route and 2 meg by I D route showed

no significant difference i n the seroconversion

rate

5 H

, though the levels of a n t i - H B s tend to

be lower after reduced doses

2 , 5 1 6

.

I n our material, a low percentage of subjects

(35.0%) accepted to be v a c c i n a t e d a g a i n s t H B V .

T h e m a i n reason for this h i g h refuse was the

unjustifiable fear that plasma-derived v a c c i n e

would be contaminated by h u m a n

immunodefi-ciency v i r u s

6

.

R E D F I E L D et a l

1 4

and M U L L E Y et a l

1 2

em-phazised that vaccine cost remains a major

obs-tacle for the e x p a n s i o n of H B V v a c c i n a t i o n

pro-grams.

T h e low doses schedule used in this study

proved to be effective, a n d , if confirmed in field

s t u d i e s

1 7

, it should be considered in large-scale

programs of i m m u n i z a t i o n a g a i n s t H B V .

R E S U M O

I m u n i z a ç ã o a t i v a contra o v í r u s da H e p a t i t e

B com b a i x a s doses da v a c i n a p l a s m a d e r i v a d a

por v i a i n t r a d é r m i c a .

O e s q u e m a h a b i t u a l m e n t e u t i l i z a d o p a r a

imunização a t i v a contra o vírus d a hepatite B

( V H B ) consiste em 3 doses de 20 m c g por v i a

i n t r a m u s c u l a r (IM) no deltóide. U m dos

proble-m a s quanto à s u a utilização eproble-m l a r g a escala

refe-re-se ao seu custo elevado. P o u c a s publicações

têm se referido a doses menores, de 10 m c g I M

ou 2 m c g i n t r a d é r m i c a ( I D ) . P e s q u i s o u - s e em

300 funcionários d a área d a saúde o a n t i - H B c

total. T o d o s os marcadores foram determinados

pela técnica de E L I S A . E m 43 (14,3%) o m a r c a

-dor foi positivo, correspondendo a 9 (3,0%) com

A g H B s e a 34 (11,3%) com a n t i - H B s . A o s 257

fun-cionários sem a n t i - H B c propôs-se u m esquema

de v a c i n a ç ã o , que foi aceito por 90 (35,0% ). I d a d e

média de 37,4 ± 8,4 anos, limites de 22 - 56 anos

e 68 do sexo feminino. E s q u e m a : 3 doses de 2

meg por v i a I D com intervalos de 1 e 6 meses.

O a n t i - H B s , pesquisado após a 2ª dose mostrou

se positivo em 74 (82,2%) e após a 3ª dose em

80 (88,9%) — diferença não s i g n i f i c a t i v a . C o n t u

do, a quantificação do a n t i - H B s mostrou níveis

10 vezes a c i m a do " c u t - o f f em 29 (32,2%) e em

77 (85,5%r) após a 2ª e 3ª doses, respectivamente

(p < 0,001). Portanto, o esquema proposto

mos-trou-se válido p a r a este tipo de população e,

ape-sar d a freqüência semelhante de sero-conversão

após a 2? e 3? doses, h á necessidade desta ú l t i m a

p a r a aumentar o título de anticorpos.

A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S

We are grateful to Doctors J O S É D I R C E U

P E R E I R A , J O S É F R U T O S D E O L I V E R A , LU¬

C I O O B A , Nurses C A T A R I N A O S A W A and LO¬

R E M A R X for the technical assistance. T h e

revi-sion of the manuscripts was made by Nurse H A N ¬

N E L O R E S P E I E R L and Doctors Z I L D A P A E S

D E B A R R O S M A T O S and W I L S O N M A T T O S

to w h o m we are deeply indebted.

R E F E R E N C E S 1. A L T E R , M . J . ; F A V E R O , M. S . & M A Y N A R D , J . E . — H e p a t i t i s B v a c c i n e u s e i n c h r o n i c h e m o d i a l y s i s c e n t e r s i n t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s . J . A m e r . m e d . A s s . , 254: 3 2 0 0 - 3 2 0 2 , 1985. 2. D A V I D S O N , M . & K R U G M A N , S . — R e c o m b i n a n t y e a s t h e p a t i t i s B v a c c i n e c o m p a r e d w i t h p l a s m a d e r i v e d v a c c i ¬ n e : i m m u n o g e n i c i t y a n d e f f e c t o f a b o o s t e r d o s e . J . I n f e c t . , 13 ( s u p p l . A ) : 31-38, 1986. 3. D I E N S T A G , J . L . ; W E R N E R , B . G . ; P O L K , B . F . ; S N Y D ¬ M A N , D . R . ; C R A V E N N , D . E . ; P L A T T , R . ; C R U M P A C ¬ K E R , C . S . ; O U E L L E T H E L L S T R O M , R . & G R A D Y , G . F . — H e p a t i t i s B v a c c i n e i n h e a l t h c a r e p e r s o n n e l : s a f e t y , i m m u n o g e n i c i t y , a n d i n d i c a t o r s o f e f f i c a c y . A n n . i n t e r n . M e d . , 101: 34-40. 1984. 4. F R A N C I S , D . P . ; H A D L E R , S . C ; T H O M P S O N , S . E . ; M A Y N A R D , J . E . ; O S T R O W , D . G . ; A L T M A N , N . ; B R A F F , E . H . ; O ' M A L L E Y , P . ; H A W K I N S , D . ; J U D S O N , F . N . ; P E N L E Y , K . ; N Y L U N D , T . ; C H R I S T I E , G . ; M E Y E R S , F . ; M O O R E , J . N . ; G A R D N E R , A . ; D O T O , I . L . ; M I L L E R , J . H . ; R E Y N O L D S , G . H . ; M U R P H Y , B . L . ; S C H A B L E , C . A ; C L A R K , B . T . ; C U R R A N , J . W . & R E D E ¬ K E R , A . G . — T h e p r e v e n t i o n of h e p a t i t i s B w i t h v a c c i n e . R e p o r t o f t h e C e n t e r s f o r D i s e a s e C o n t r o l m u l t i c e n t e r e f f i c a c c y t r i a l a m o n g h o m o s e x u a l m e n . A n n . i n t e r n . M e d . , 97: 3 6 2 - 3 6 6 , 1982. 5. F R A Z E R , I . H . ; J O N E S , B . ; D I M I T R A K A K I S , M . & M A C ¬ K A Y , I . R . — I n t r a m u s c u l a r v e r s u s l o w d o s e i n t r a d e r m a l h e p a t i t i s B v a c c i n e . A s s e s s m e n t b y h u m o r a l a n d c e l l u l a r i m m u n e r e s p o n s e to h e p a t i t i s B s u r f a c e a n t i g e n . M e d . J . A u s t . , 146: 2 4 2 - 2 4 5 , 1987. 6. F U L T O N , J . P . ; B O D E N H E I M E R J R . , H . C . & K R A M E R , P . D . — A c c e p t a n c e of h e p a t i t i s B v a c c i n e a m o n g h o s p i t a l w o r k e r s : a f o l l o w - u p . A m e r . J . p u b l . H l t h . , 76: 1339-1340, 1986.

(4)

7. G O U D E A U , A . ; D E N I S , F . ; M O U N I E R , M.; D U B O I S , F . ; K L E I N , J . , G O D E F R O Y , A . ; B A L L E T , M. & M O U N T I J , A . — C o m p a r a t i v e m u l t i c e n t r e s t u d y o f t h e i m m u n o g e -n i c i t y of d i f f e r e -n t h e p a t i t i s B v a c c i -n e s i -n h e a l t h y v o l u -n ¬ t e e r s . P o s t g r a d , m e d . J . , 63 ( s u p p l . 2 ) : 125-128, 1987. 8. H A U L E R , S . C ; F R A N C I S , D . P . ; M A Y N A R D , J . E . ; T H O M P S O N , S . E . ; J U D S O N , F . N . ; E C H E M B E R G , D . F . ; O S T R O W , D . G . ; O ' M A L L E Y , P . M . ; P E N L E Y , K . A . ; A L T M A N , N . I ; J 3 R A F F , E . ; S H I P M A N , G . F . ; C O L E M A N , P . J . & M A N D E L , E . J . — L o n g t e r m i m m u n o g e n i c i t y a n d e f f i c a c y o f h e p a t i t i s B v a c c i n e i n h o m o s e x u a l m e n . N e w Eng-1. J . M e d . , 3 1 5 : 2 0 9 - 2 1 4 , 1986. 9. H A L S E Y , N . A . ; R E P P E R T , E . J . ; M A R G O L I S , H . S . ; F R A N C I S , D . P . & F I E L D S , H . A . — I n t r a d e r m a l h e p a t i t i s B v a c c i n a t i o n i n a n a b b r e v i a t e d s c h e d u l e . V a c c i n e , 4: 228-232, 1986. 10. I R V I N G , W . L . ; A L D E R , M., K U R T Z , J . B . & J U E L J E N -S E N , B . — I n t r a d e r m a l v a c c i n a t i o n a g a i n s t h e p a t i t i s B . L a n c e t , 2: 1340, 1986. 11. M I L L E R , K . D . ; G I B B S , R . D ; M U L L I G A N , M . M.; N U T M A N , T . B . & F R A N C I S , D . P . — I n t r a d e r m a l h e p a t i t i s B v a c c i n e : i m m u n o g e n i c i t y a n d s i d e e f f e c t s i n a d u l t s . L a n -c e t , 2 : 1454-1456, 1983. 12. M U L L E Y , A . G . ; S I L V E R S T E I N , M . D . & D I E N S T A G , J . L . — I n d i c a t i o n s for u s e o f h e p a t i t i s B v a c c i n e , b a s e d o n c o s t e f f e c t i v e n e s s a n a l y s i s . N e w E n g l . J . M e d . , 3 0 7 : 6 4 4 - 6 5 2 , 1982. 1 3 . P A P A E V A N G E L O U , G . ; R O U M E L I O T O U ¬ K A R A Y A N N I S , A . ; V I S S O U L I S , C h . ; S T A T H O P O U ¬ L O U , P . ; K O L A I T I S , N . & K R U G M A N , S . — R e d u c t i o n of t h e d o s e o f h e p a t i t i s B v a c c i n e . J . I n f e c t . , 7 ( s u p p l . 1): 69-70, 1983. 14. R E D F I E L D , R . R . ; I N N I S , B . L . ; S C O T T , R . M.; C A N N O N , H . G . & B A N C R O F T , W . H . — C l i n i c a l e v a l u a t i o n o f l o w ¬ d o s e i n t r a d e r m a l l y a d m i n i s t e r e d h e p a t i t i s B v i r u s v a c c i -n e . A c o s t r e d u c t i o -n s t r a t e g y . J . A m e r . m e d . A s s . , 2 5 4 : 3 2 0 3 - 3 2 0 6 , 1985. 15. S Z M U N E S S , W . ; S T E V E N S , C . E . ; H A R L E Y , E . J . ; Z A N G . E . A . ; A L T E R , J . ; T A Y L O R , P . E . ; D E V E R A , A . ; C H E N , G . T . S . ; K E L L N E R , A . & T H E D I A L Y S I S V A C C I N E T R I A L S T U D Y G R O U P — H e p a t i t i s B v a c c i n e i n m e d i c a l s t a f f o f h e m o d i a l y s i s u n i t s . E f f i c a c y a n d s u b t y p e c r o s s ¬ p r o t e c t i o n . N e w E n g l . J . M e d . , 3 0 7 : 1481¬1486, 1982. 16. Z O U L E C K , G . ; L O R B E E R , B . ; J I L G , W . & D E I N H A R D T , F . — A n t i b o d y r e s p o n s e s a n d s k i n r e a c t i v i t y a f t e r i n t r a ¬ d e r m a l h e p a t i t i s B v i r u s v a c c i n e ( l e t t e r t o e d i t o r ) . L a n c e t , 1: 568, 1984. 17. Z U C K E R M A N , A . J . — A p p r a i s a l o f i n t r a d e r m a l i m m u n i -s a t i o n a g a i n -s t h e p a t i t i -s B . L a n c e t , 1: 4 3 5 - 4 3 6 , 1987. R e c e b i d o p a r a p u b l i c a ç ã o e m 1 4 / 1 1 / 1 9 8 8 .

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Os resultados apontam que, nos fenômenos investigados, há diferentes motivações internas para a variação linguística, com a atuação de fatores de natureza formal, como

«A escola, como a manifestação mais si- gnificaltiva do estado culto de um povo, escreve Guilherme Ennes, deve, nas suas installações de toda a ordem, e para a per- venção e

By comparing the results in both groups (water and sucro- se), when analyzed separately, it can be observed that sucrose is an effective stimulus both to maintain strong correlations

our results showed that clozapine, in low doses of lexible regime, in long term, in chronic schizophrenics with positive and negative syndrome was significantly more effective

When the very hot oil vat (the system) is placed in contact with the ants, the ants play the role of heat reservoir and it is their temperature T e that must be used when applying

Na fileira da Distribuição, o frio é utilizado para manter os alimentos conservados a temperaturas adequadas evitando a sua degradação. Como normalmente nesta fileira não

The use of platelets plasma rich in the subcutaneous recipient bed wound has provided good results in the Gprpms and Gprpm when compared with other groups that

Immunization of BALB/c mice with adenovirus expressing A2 (AdA2) resulted in low antibody response, contrasting with high levels of IFN- ␥ producing CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells specific