• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Bras. . vol.74 número5 en v74n5a01

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Bras. . vol.74 número5 en v74n5a01"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texto

(1)

642

Brazilian Journalof otorhinolaryngology 74 (5) SeptemBer/octoBer 2008 http://www.rborl.org.br / e-mail: [email protected]

Paradoxes in approaching the most prevalent infections

in ENT practice: tonsillitis, sinusitis, and otitis media

EDITORIAL

Young children going to day care centers complai-ning of secretion, nasal obstruction, and cough can be seen on a daily basis in the pediatric ENT practice. The signs and symptoms of viral and bacterial respiratory infections are often juxtaposed to allergy, leading physicians to prescribe less-than-adequate drugs to treat the conditions at hand. Most prescription errors are due to inaccurate diagnosis, as interviews and clinical examination are neglected and test results are misinterpreted.

Until some time ago Medical Doctors used to ap-preciate the value of a good interview with the patient, properly conducted clinical examination, and the epide-miologic data gathered from the community he or she served. Objective clinical data was abundant, whereas ancillary tests were not amply available. Today, lab tests and imaging technologies that some decades ago were virtually unthinkable are reasonably available, depending on the site and affordability.

On the other hand, this change has led many phy-sicians to develop therapies based on ancillary test reports (often excessively ordered), instead of fitting the pieces of the puzzle taking into account the signs and symptoms (along with physical examination) mentioned by the pa-tient. In other words, physicians are treating reports instead of patients. Thorough interview and properly conducted physical examination are being traded for interpretation of reports and test results – based on often poorly indicated exams thus originating prescription errors.

The opposite also happens, and that may be the case most of the time in developing countries. Physicians working at emergency units that see a large number of children without knowing anything on their history and unable to assess patient clinical evolution within the following 24 or 48 hours, tend to diagnose and treat most acute respiratory infections as bacterial disease. Antibiotics are often prescribed, mainly when the resources needed to enhance bacterial disease diagnostic certainty are not available.

When looking at respiratory diseases, the two situ-ations described above will objectively lead to diagnosis without disease; patient complains of a sore throat, test for oropharyngeal strep infection is not available, patient is prescribed antibiotics for viral infection; hyperemic tympanic membrane (TM) when patient cries, patient is wrongly diagnosed with acute otitis media or even TM opacity due to effusion otitis media and, consequently, is offered antibiotics; diagnosis of sinusitis using a simple x-ray image done as the child cries or in the early stages of a cold, with poor visualization of the paranasal cavity, leading to unnecessary prescription of antibiotics. This is a true radiologic sinusitis epidemic. All situations above induce medication abuse.

Patient interview and careful physical examination and, in some circumstances, ancillary tests, are fundamen-tal to produce accurate diagnosis. Physicians also need to get more acquainted with the principles of evidence-based care in order to select the most adequate therapy for each patient, bearing in mind that the efficacy of many commonly prescribed drugs is not proven as they may produce severe adverse effects.

In the upper airways, the three diseases most com-monly associated with overmedication errors are tonsillitis, sinusitis, and acute otitis media.

It is important, therefore, that PATIENT INTERVIEW and DIAGNOSIS (based on complementary tests) are firmly connected to each other, so patients are offered the proper treatment based on evidence-based medical care.

Tania Sih, MD, PhD

Otorhinolaryngologist. Professor at the USP Medi-cal School. MediMedi-cal Investigation Laboratory (LIM) # 40. Founder and Secretary General of the IAPO (Interamerican Association of Pediatric ORL - www.iapo.org.com). Author of 19 books on pediatric ENT.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Table 4 shows the results of the statistical analy- sis comparing MMN latency and amplitude values for frequency deviations (MMNf) and the elicited MMN for duration deviations

quality of life improvements following adenotonsillectomy in children with OSDs; in the year 2000 he disseminated a specific questionnaire - the OSA18 - which opened the file

At an 80 dBnHL intensity, which is generally used in clinical practice for neurodiagnosis, there was a statistically significant difference between rarefaction polarity and

non-syndromic hearing loss patients in the United King- dom.5 Likewise in our study, the A1555G mitochondrial mutation was not found in the HLG groups (consisting of group I: 13

The comparison of acoustic reflex sensitization between genders in the control group revealed that there was a statistically significant difference at 500, 1000 and 2000

This study used acoustic rhinometry to determine the reference values for nasal cross-sectional areas to be used, for comparison purposes, in the analysis of adults with

from 6 months to 10 years during one year, which had been randomized into a prompt antibiotic therapy group and a conservative approach group (WASP, or giving antibiotics

Wright’s study of 30 patients with nasal respiratory insufficiency in 1911 treated by RME showed, by measuring the width of the nasal cavity with pre- and post-expansion