• Nenhum resultado encontrado

J. Coloproctol. (Rio J.) vol.34 número4

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "J. Coloproctol. (Rio J.) vol.34 número4"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texto

(1)

jcoloproctol(rioj).2014;34(4):250–253

Journal

of

Coloproctology

w w w . j c o l . o r g . b r

Original

article

Assessment

of

LIFT

(ligation

of

the

intersphincteric

fistula

tract)

technique

in

patients

with

perianal

transsphincteric

fistulas

Caroline

Sauter

Dalbem,

Sérgio

Danilo

Tanahara

Tomiyoshi,

Carlos

Henrique

Marques

dos

Santos

UniversidadeFederaldeMatoGrossodoSul(UFMS),CampoGrande,MS,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received26March2014 Accepted4September2014 Availableonline22October2014

Keywords:

Fistula Treatment Colorectalsurgery

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

PerianalfistulasarearelativelycommonconditioninProctologyoffices,rangingfrom sim-plecaseswitheasilypalpablesuperficialtractstocomplexproblemswithdeeptractsacross significantportionsoftheanalsphincter,whichsectioncanleadtovaryingdegreesof incontinenceduringafistulotomy.

Objective:ToevaluatetheeffectivenessoftheuseoftheLIFT(ligationoftheintersphincteric fistulatract)techniqueinpatientswithperianaltranssphinctericfistulas.

Method:Aprospectivestudyofpatientswithperianaltranssphinctericfistulawho under-wentLIFT.Patientswithperianalfistulasofcryptoglandulartranssphinctericoriginwithno previoussurgicalinterventionswereincludedinthestudy.Patientswithperianalfistulas fromanothersource,suchasCrohn’sdisease,tuberculosis,analcancerandrecurrent fistu-las,wereexcluded.Allpatientsunderwentthesameanesthetictechnique,withsubsequent surgicaltreatmentintwostages:setonplacementand,after6weeks,completionofLIFT.

Results:Weevaluated22patients;themeanagewas45.6years.Thepost-LIFToutpatient follow-uprangedfrom4to24monthswithameanfollow-upof14months.Thehealing timevariedfrom4to8weeksaftertheprocedure.Seventeenpatientswerecured(77%)and fiverelapsed(23%);however,allofthemexhibitedtheintersphincterictype,havingbeen treatedbyfistulotomyandalsoachievingcompletecure.Onefemalepatientdevelopedmild fecalincontinence.

Conclusion:The LIFT technique proved to be safe and effective in the treatment of transsphinctericperianalfistulas.

©2014SociedadeBrasileiradeColoproctologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.All rightsreserved.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:chenriquems@yahoo.com.br(C.H.M.dosSantos).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcol.2014.09.001

(2)

jcoloproctol(rioj).2014;34(4):250–253

251

Avaliac¸ão

da

técnica

LIFT

(Ligation

of

the

Intersphincteric

Fistula

Tract)

em

pacientes

com

fístulas

perianais

transesfincterianas

Palavras-chave:

Fístula Tratamento Cirurgiacolorretal

r

e

s

u

m

o

Asfístulasperianaissãoumacondic¸ãorelativamentecomumemconsultóriode proctolo-gia,podendovariardesdecasossimples,comtrajetossuperficiaisfacilmentepalpáveis, atécasoscomplexos,comtrajetosprofundos,atravessandoporc¸õesconsideráveisdo apar-elhoesfincteriano,cujasecc¸ãopodelevaragrausvariáveisdeincontinênciaduranteuma fistulotomia.

Objetivo: AvaliaraefetividadedoempregodatécnicaLIFT(ligationoftheintersphincteric fistulatract)nospacientesportadoresdefístulasperianaistransesfincterianas.

Método: Estudoprospectivocompacientesportadoresdefístulaperianal transesfincteri-anasubmetidosàtécnicaLIFT.Foramincluídosnoestudopacientesportadoresdefistulas perianaisdeorigemcriptoglandulartransesfincterianasemintervenc¸õescirúrgicasprévias. Foramexcluídospacientesportadoresdefístulasperianaisdeoutraorigem,comodoenc¸ade Crohn,tuberculose,neoplasiaanalefístulasrecidivadas.Todosospacientesforam submeti-dosàmesmatécnicaanestésicaeposteriortratamentocirúrgicoemdoistempos:colocac¸ão desedenhoeapósseissemanasrealizac¸ãodeLIFT.

Resultados: Foramavaliados22pacientes;amédiadeidadeobservadafoide45,6anos.O seguimentoambulatorialpós-LIFTvarioude4a24meses,commédiadeacompanhamento de14meses.Otempodecicatrizac¸ãovarioude4a8semanaspós-procedimento.Dezessete pacientesficaramcurados(77%)ecincoapresentaramrecidiva(23%),porém,todosnaforma interesfincterianaeforamtratadosporfistulotomia,alcanc¸andotambémacuracompleta. Umapacienteevoluiucomincontinênciafecalleve.

Conclusão:AtécnicaLIFTdemonstrouserseguraeeficaznotratamentodasfístulasperianais transesfincterianas.

©2014SociedadeBrasileiradeColoproctologia.PublicadoporElsevierEditoraLtda. Todososdireitosreservados.

Introduction

Theoccurrenceofperianaldiseasedatesbackfromantiquity. For the treatment of anal fistulas, Hippocrates recom-mended,amongotherprocedures,cauterizingandanodizing the fistula – which can be understood today as seton application.1

Overthe years,various studies and surgicaltechniques havebeendevelopedwiththeaimtofindthemostappropriate treatmentforthisdisease,whichhasanincidenceof1/10,000 inhabitantsperyearandrepresents5%ofallColoproctology officevisits.2,3

These defects are distributed in the following propor-tion,usingtheclassificationdescribedbyParksetal.(1976): intersphincteric(60–75%),transsphincteric(15–20%), supras-phincteric(5%)andextrasphincteric(1–3%)fistulas.2

Currently,thereislittledoubtastotheindicationof sur-gicaltreatmentasthebesttreatmentoption,andfistulotomy isthetechniqueofchoiceforthevastmajorityofcases. How-ever,morecomplexfistulae, whentreatedsimilarly,canbe cured–butonlyattheexpense ofvaryingdegreesoffecal incontinence.

Thus,manyother techniqueshavebeen developedwith theaimtoachievethesamecurerateforfistulotomy,but with-outcausingfecalincontinenceincasesofgreatercomplexity. However,thereisstillnocleardefinitionofthebestoptionin thesecases.

In2007,Rojanasakuletal.4 described anewtherapeutic

optionforcaseslikethese,withverypromisinginitialresults. TheLIFT(ligation oftheintersphinctericfistulatract) tech-nique,asitbecameknown,hasshowngoodresultsalsoin otherstudies,5notinferiortotraditionaltechniques,andstill

havingasgreatmeritthefactof(theoretically)notcausing fecalincontinence,consideringthatnosectionofthe sphinc-teroccurs.Astherearestillfewstudiesonthesubject,theaim ofthisresearchistoevaluatetheresultsofLIFTinpatients withtranssphinctericperianalfistulas.

Method

ThestudywasapprovedbytheEthicsCommitteeonResearch oftheUniversidadeFederaldeMatoGrossodoSul.For inclu-sion,thepatientswereinformedbytheresearchteamonthe surgicaltechniqueusedandonthepossiblecomplicationsof thesurgery;andagreedtoparticipateinthestudy,completing thefreeandinformedconsentterm.

(3)

252

jcoloproctol(rioj).2014;34(4):250–253

Coloproctology,HospitalRegionaldeMatoGrossodoSul,and fromtheprivatepracticeofoneoftheauthors.

Thestudy was conducted from May 2012 toSeptember 2013. Patients with perianal fistulas from another source, individuals with Crohn’s disease,tuberculosis, anal cancer andwhohadrecurrentfistulaswereexcluded.Patientswith intersphincteric,suprasphinctericandextrasphincteric peri-analfistulaswerealsoexcluded.Allpatientswere operated under spinal blockwith morphine. The surgicaltreatment wasperformedintwostages: first,theidentification ofthe fistula,thusconfirmingatranssphincteric tract.Thefistula wasthenrepairedbyapplyingalatexseton.Theplacementof thesetonwasintendedtoinduceamoreconsistentfibrosis, makingthefistuloustractwelldefined.Thesecondstepwas performedafter6weeks:theremovalofthelatexseton, curet-tageofthetract,anopeningoftheskinapproximately1cm perpendiculartothe fistuloustractand dissectionbetween the internal and external sphincters, to the identification and repair of the fistula. Then a transfixing ligature with polyglactin zero and the section of the tract between the sphincterswereperformed,followed bythe introductionof aprobe toconfirm the closing ofthe segments ofthe fis-tuloustractandofskinclosure.Thecrypt(innerhole)was cauterizedwithelectrocauteryandtheexternaloswaskept open.

Thepostoperativefollow-upwasperformedinan outpa-tientcliniconthe15thdayandthenevery30daysuntilthe completehealingofthefistula.Thereafter,thevisitsoccurred bimonthlyorbeforethattime,ifnecessary.

Intheoutpatientfollow-up,perioperativeinfection, heal-ingtime,pain,recurrenceandfecalcontinencechangewere evaluated.

Results

During the study period, 41 patients with transsphinc-teric perianal fistulaswere selected, of which 22 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were kept in the study.

Ofthese22patients,12(55%)weremaleand10(45%)were female.Theagerangedfrom17to62years,withameanof45 years.Thetimeelapsedfromtheonsetofacomplaint com-patiblewithperianalfistulatothediagnosisrangedfrom3to 36months,withameanof11months(Table1).

Ineachcase,thepatientwasdischargedwithin24h.During theoutpatientfollow-up,localinfection(drainageofpusfrom surgicalwound)occurredinfivepatients(23%),whowereonly followedwithoutfurtherinterventionandwithspontaneous resolution.

Thepost-LIFT outpatientfollow-up rangedfrom 4to24 months,withameanfollow-up of14months.Thehealing timevariedfrom4to8weeksaftertheprocedure.

Seventeen(77%)patientsobtainedcompleteresolutionof their fistula with the technique adopted, while five (23%) relapsed.Ofthesefive,allhadarecurrenceintheformofan intersphinctericfistula,beingsubsequentlyoperatedby fis-tulotomy,with complete resolution– thus,athird surgical procedure. A female patient developed mild fecal inconti-nence(Fig.1).

Table1–Patientswithperianaltranssphinctericfistula treatedwithLIFTtechnique.

Patient Gender Age(years) Timefromdiseaseto treatment(months)

1 Male 24 5

2 Male 28 9

3 Female 17 14

4 Male 45 14

5 Male 60 3

6 Male 46 12

7 Female 38 10

8 Female 60 10

9 Male 34 9

10 Female 57 5

11 Male 35 4

12 Male 56 36

13 Female 50 18

14 Female 49 13

15 Female 62 10

16 Male 48 16

17 Female 49 7

18 Male 49 9

19 Female 48 12

20 Male 49 6

21 Male 39 12

22 Female 47 8

Mean 12M/10F 45 11

20

15

10

5

0

Healing Recurrence

Fig.1–AssessmentofprimaryhealingindexafterLIFTin thetreatmentofperianaltranssphinctericfistulas.

Discussion

Many studies on the LIFT surgical technique are still in progress;thisisstillconsideredanoveltechniqueforusein thetreatmentofperianalfistulas.

In the original publication describing the technique, Rojanasakulet al.4 appliedLIFT in18consecutive patients,

observingprimaryhealingin17ofthem.Thisresult encour-agedotherauthorstoevaluateLIFTinstudiesworldwide.

Inthisseriesofcases,aprimaryhealingrateof77%was observed. InAmerican studies that included patients who failedaprevioustreatment,thehealingraterangedfrom55 to 64%.6 In Australia, Ooiet al.,7 who alsoincludedin the

(4)

jcoloproctol(rioj).2014;34(4):250–253

253

other hand,Shanwanietal.5 reported curein82%oftheir

sample.Europeanstudiesshowedresolutionratesof71–83% forprimaryhealing,andinsomeofthemupto100% heal-inginthesample,inthosestudiesthatconsideredsecondary healingpatients.Thisdemonstratesthattheresultsobtained inthisstudywerewithintheexpected,accordingtothe avail-ableliterature,whichcanbeconsideredagoodoutcomefora stillrecenttechnique.6

Themeanfollow-upinthisserieswas14monthsandthe relapseratewas23%.InstudiesofYassinetal.6andLiuetal.8

themeanfollow-upwas19and28months,respectively,and therecurrenceratewas36%and32%,respectively. Possibly thelowerrelapseseen inthispaperisinferiortotheother studiespresentedhereduetoashorterfollow-up,although themostimportantpublicationsonLIFTdemonstratenolate recurrenceoffistulas.Whenrelapseoccurs,itisusuallyinthe firstweeks,afactalsoobservedinourfivepatientsinwhom recurrencewasobserved.

Thehealingtimeobservedinthisstudyrangedfrom4to8 weeks.Ooietal.7andShanwanietal.5reportedamean

heal-ingtimeof6and5weeks,respectively,i.e.,thesamemean hereobtained.Theoccurrenceofslightvariationsis proba-bleinaccordancewithwhatisconsideredas“healing”.Here, weconsideredas“completehealing”theinterruptionofthe flowofpurulentsecretionwithcoaptationoftheedgesofthe wound.

Intheliterature,dataarelackingforcomparisonwiththe resultspresentedherewithrespecttopostoperativeinfection, probablybecausethisanalysisisquitesubjective.Moreover, this analysisisless importantcompared withfistula heal-ingandthe evaluationofcontinence–parametersthatare effectivelyanalyzedbymostpublicationsonLIFT.

Although generally the results obtained in this study demonstratethatLIFTisaverypromisingtechnique,inline withdatafromtheliterature,weconsiderasbeingquite dis-turbingtheobservationoffecalincontinenceinoneofour patients, bybeing ayoung woman withno other risk fac-tors for this condition. Considering that one of the main expectedadvantagesofthe techniqueisaloworzero pos-sibilityofanimpairedsphincterfunction(sincethereisno sectionofthesphincter),thisresultwasquitesurprising.That patienthasbeentreatedwithpelvicfloorphysicaltherapy, withimprovement.NoAmerican, Asianor Oceanian study reported damage to the sphincter function. However, in a reviewconductedbyYassinet al.,6 it wasobservedthat in

11%oftheirsampletherewassomesortofchangein con-tinence.Thismaybeassociatedwiththeinclusionofpatients withrecurrentperianalfistulawhohadgonethroughprevious treatments.

Ofthefivepatientswhodidnotachieveaprimaryhealing inthisstudy,allshowedrecurrenceintheincisionforligation ofthefistuloustract,i.e.,theirdefectsturnedinto intersphinc-tericfistulas,andcouldbesubsequentlytreatedbyfistulotomy withcompleteresolutionandwithnofecalincontinence.This developmenthasalreadybeenreportedbyothersandcanbe consideredanadvantageofthemethod,whichenablesa pri-marycureinmostcases,but,whenthisdoesnotoccur,atleast reducesthecomplexityofthefistuloustract.6–9

Conclusion

TheLIFTtechniquewaseffectiveinthetreatmentofperianal transsphinctericfistulas.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1.Ahistóriadacoloproctologia[Internet].Availablefrom:

http://www.procto.net.br/page.html[accessed02.04.12]. 2.SobradoCW,NahasSC,MarquesCFS.FístulasAnorretais.In:

RodriguesJJG,MachadoMCC,RasslanS,editors.Clínica Cirúrgica,1.Barueri-SP:EditoraManole;2008.p.997–1007.

3.RochaJJR.ProcessosInfecciososPerianais,Abscessos Perianais,FístulasPerianaiseGangrenaperineal[Internet]. Availablefrom:http://www.fmrp.usp.br/cg/novo/images/ pdf/conteudodisciplinas/processosinfecciosos[accessed 30.03.12].

4.RojanasakulA,PattanaarunJ,SahakitrungruangC.Totalanal sphinctersavingtechniqueforfistula-in-ano;theligationof intersphinctericfistulatract.JMedAssocThai.2007;90:581–6.

5.ShanwaniAMS,NorAM,AmriNMK.Theligationofthe intesphinctericfistulatract(LIFT):asphincter-saving techniqueforfistula-in-ano.DisColonRectum.2010;53:39–42.

6.YassinNA,HammondTM,LunnissPJ,PhillipsRK.Ligationof theintersphinctericfistulatractinthemanagementofanal fistula.Asystematicreview.ColorectalDis.2013;15:527–35.

7.OoiK,SkinnerI,CroxfordM,FaragherI,McLaughlinS. Managingfistula-in-anowithligationoftheintersphincteric fistulatractprocedure:theWesternHospitalexperience. ColorectalDis.2012;14:599–603.

8.LiuWY,AboulianA,KajiAH,KumarRR.Long-termresultsof ligationofintersphinctericfistulatract(LIFT)forfistula-in-ano. DisColonRectum.2013;56:343–7.

9.VanOnkelenRS,GosselinkMP,SchoutenWR.Ligationofthe intersphinctericfistulatractinlowtranssphinctericfistulae:a newtechniquetoavoidfistulotomy.ColorectDis.

Imagem

Table 1 – Patients with perianal transsphincteric fistula treated with LIFT technique.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The probability of attending school four our group of interest in this region increased by 6.5 percentage points after the expansion of the Bolsa Família program in 2007 and

ish green, the flower buds chlorotic. Manganese e) Leaves yellowish green with green veins and many brown spots; the apical buds remain alive. Zinc £) Younger leaves become

The results obtained in this study showed that the developed microspheres and all their components did not present cytotoxicity to the evaluated cells as all showed a percentage

Table I shows the main characteristics of the patients studied who had mediastinitis after cardiac transplantation. In this study, we did not consider those patients with

Ao Dr Oliver Duenisch pelos contatos feitos e orientação de língua estrangeira Ao Dr Agenor Maccari pela ajuda na viabilização da área do experimento de campo Ao Dr Rudi Arno

Neste trabalho o objetivo central foi a ampliação e adequação do procedimento e programa computacional baseado no programa comercial MSC.PATRAN, para a geração automática de modelos

The primary outcome was to measure primary healing, overall healing, failure, and recurrence of ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure and its modifications..

If, on the contrary, our teaching becomes a political positioning on a certain content and not the event that has been recorded – evidently even with partiality, since the